pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05757 · v1 · pith:756Q6BMQnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el

Detecting Topological Transitions and Anisotropy through Multipartite Entanglement in Holographic Weyl Semimetals

Xiantong Chen , Xuanting Ji , Wen-Peng Li , Ya-Wen Sun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-el
keywords holographic Weyl semimetalmultipartite entanglementtopological phase transitionanisotropyentanglement wedge cross sectionconditional mutual informationMarkov gap
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tripartite and four-partite entanglement structures diagnose the topological phase transition in holographic Weyl semimetals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes multipartite entanglement quantities such as conditional mutual information, entanglement wedge cross section, tripartite measures κ and Markov gap, and four-partite signals Δ and g for strip regions in a holographic Weyl semimetal model. These quantities are tracked as functions of strip width l and the tuning parameter that drives the topological transition. At fixed large l, all quantities develop clear features near the critical point, and their large-l scaling is anisotropic in the nontrivial phase. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a nonlocal entanglement-based way to identify topological transitions and IR anisotropy without local order parameters.

Core claim

In the zero-temperature holographic Weyl semimetal, tripartite and four-partite entanglement quantities for strip regions develop clear features near the critical point at fixed large l, showing that these structures diagnose the topological quantum phase transition. At large l their dependence on l takes a power-law form governed by the IR scaling of the system. Anisotropic large-l behavior in different directions distinguishes the nontrivial phase from the trivial phase.

What carries the argument

Multipartite entanglement quantities (conditional mutual information, EWCS, κ, Markov gap, multi-EWCS, and four-partite signals Δ and g) computed geometrically in the holographic bulk for strip regions.

If this is right

  • Tripartite and four-partite entanglement structures diagnose the topological quantum phase transition.
  • Anisotropic large-l behavior distinguishes the nontrivial phase from the trivial phase.
  • At large l the quantities follow power-law forms set by the IR scaling.
  • Multipartite holographic entanglement serves as a sensitive nonlocal probe of topological transitions and anisotropic IR physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric method could be applied to other holographic models of topological materials to check whether multipartite entanglement remains diagnostic.
  • If the duality holds, field-theory calculations or quantum simulations of the dual theory should reproduce the reported features at the critical point.
  • Direction-dependent entanglement measures might suggest protocols for detecting anisotropy in real condensed-matter Weyl semimetals.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic model and its geometric entanglement calculations accurately reproduce the entanglement structure of the dual field theory.

What would settle it

Direct computation of the same multipartite entanglement quantities in the dual field theory that shows no clear features near the critical point at fixed large l.

read the original abstract

We study multipartite entanglement structures in the zero-temperature holographic Weyl semimetal, focusing on tripartite and four-partite structures. For strip regions, we compute the conditional mutual information, the entanglement wedge cross section, tripartite measures $\kappa$ and the Markov gap, multi-EWCS, and two multi-EWCS based four-partite signals $\Delta$ and $g$. These quantities are studied as functions of the strip width $l$ and the tuning parameter across the topological transition. At large $l$, their $l$ dependence takes a power-law form governed by the IR scaling of the system. At fixed large $l$, all these entanglement quantities develop clear features near the critical point, showing that tripartite and four-partite entanglement structures can diagnose the topological quantum phase transition. We further study strips pointing in different directions to probe the anisotropy of the system. The anisotropic large l behavior distinguishes the nontrivial phase from the trivial phase. These results establish multipartite holographic entanglement as a sensitive, nonlocal probe of topological phase transitions and anisotropic IR physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines multipartite entanglement structures in the zero-temperature holographic Weyl semimetal. For strip regions it computes conditional mutual information, the entanglement wedge cross section, tripartite measures κ and the Markov gap, multi-EWCS, and the four-partite signals Δ and g as functions of strip width l and the tuning parameter across the topological transition. At fixed large l these quantities develop features near the critical point; their large-l anisotropic behavior is reported to distinguish the nontrivial phase from the trivial phase, with the l-dependence governed by the IR scaling of the geometry.

Significance. If the mappings hold, the work demonstrates that tripartite and four-partite holographic entanglement quantities can serve as nonlocal diagnostics for topological phase transitions and IR anisotropy, extending the reach of entanglement probes beyond bipartite measures in a strongly coupled condensed-matter model. The direct use of the numerical bulk geometry to extract power-law IR scaling is a concrete strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sections defining the multipartite quantities and the numerical results] The central claim that the computed geometric quantities diagnose the topological transition and distinguish anisotropic phases rests on the identification of multi-EWCS, the Markov gap, κ, Δ and g with the corresponding field-theory multipartite entanglement measures. These identifications are proposals (EWCS → EoP and extensions to multipartite cases) rather than theorems verified for the present background; the manuscript supplies no cross-check against a solvable limit or independent field-theory computation. This assumption is load-bearing for the diagnostic power asserted at large but finite l.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting both its potential significance and the need for precision regarding the conjectural status of the entanglement mappings. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections defining the multipartite quantities and the numerical results] The central claim that the computed geometric quantities diagnose the topological transition and distinguish anisotropic phases rests on the identification of multi-EWCS, the Markov gap, κ, Δ and g with the corresponding field-theory multipartite entanglement measures. These identifications are proposals (EWCS → EoP and extensions to multipartite cases) rather than theorems verified for the present background; the manuscript supplies no cross-check against a solvable limit or independent field-theory computation. This assumption is load-bearing for the diagnostic power asserted at large but finite l.

    Authors: We agree that the identifications of multi-EWCS, the Markov gap, κ, Δ and g with field-theory multipartite entanglement measures rest on conjectural proposals extending the EWCS-EoP relation, rather than on theorems proven for this background. The manuscript contains no independent cross-checks against solvable limits or direct field-theory computations, which is a limitation of the present holographic setup. Within the holographic framework, however, these geometric quantities are computed directly from the bulk metric and are shown to develop clear features near the critical point at fixed large l and to exhibit anisotropic power-law scaling governed by the IR geometry; these behaviors are independent of the precise field-theory interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit caveats in the introduction, the sections defining the quantities, and the conclusions, stating the conjectural nature of the mappings and restricting the diagnostic claims to the holographic quantities themselves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical evaluation of holographic quantities in fixed background

full rationale

The paper numerically evaluates standard holographic prescriptions (RT, EWCS, multi-EWCS, conditional mutual information, Markov gap, κ, Δ, g) on the known Weyl-semimetal metric as functions of strip width l and tuning parameter. The IR power-law scaling is taken directly from the asymptotic geometry rather than fitted; features at the critical point are outputs of that evaluation. No step equates a derived quantity to its own input by construction, renames a fit as a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain for the central diagnostic claim. External conjectures for the multipartite measures are cited as premises but do not create internal circularity within the reported computations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are listed in the provided text. The central claim rests on the standard holographic dictionary and the existence of an IR scaling regime.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Holographic duality maps bulk geometric quantities to boundary entanglement measures
    Invoked when the authors equate computed EWCS and multi-EWCS to field-theory entanglement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1126 out tokens · 24476 ms · 2026-06-28T00:25:30.915002+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Witten, Three lectures on topological phases of matter, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 39 (2016) 313–370.arXiv:1510.07698

    E. Witten, Three lectures on topological phases of matter, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 39 (2016) 313–370.arXiv:1510.07698. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1510.07698

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Topological order: from long-range entangled quantum matter to an unification of light and electrons

    X.-G. Wen, Topological order: from long-range entangled quantum matter to an unification of light and electrons, ISRN Cond. Matt. Phys. 2013 (2013) 198710.arXiv:1210.1281, doi:10.1155/2013/198710

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1155/2013/198710 2013

  3. [3]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu, The holographic weyl semi-metal, Physics Letters B 753 (2016) 453–457.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.052. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.052

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.052 2016

  4. [4]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, Quantum phase transition between a topological and a trivial semimetal from holography, Physical Review Letters 116 (8) (Feb. 2016). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.081602. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.081602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.081602 2016

  5. [5]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, Odd viscosity in the quantum critical region of a holographic weyl semimetal, Physical Review Letters 117 (8) (Aug. 2016). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.081604. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.081604

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.081604 2016

  6. [6]

    Landsteiner, Y

    K. Landsteiner, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, Holographic topological semimetals, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63 (5) (2020) 250001.doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1477-7. URLhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-019-1477-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1477-7 2020

  7. [7]

    B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, X.-G. Wen, Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter: From Quantum Entanglement to Topological Phases of Many-Body Systems, Springer New York, 2019.doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9084-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9084-9 2019

  8. [8]

    S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti-de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence, Physical Review Letters 96 (18) (May 2006).doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 2006

  9. [9]

    S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006 (08) (2006) 045–045.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 2006

  10. [10]

    Zaanen, Y

    J. Zaanen, Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, K. Schalm, Holographic duality in condensed matter physics, Cambridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  11. [11]

    Liu, Y.-W

    Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, Topological invariants for holographic semimetals, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (10) (Oct. 2018).doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)189. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)189

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)189 2018

  12. [12]

    X. Chen, X. Ji, Y.-W. Sun, Topological invariant for holographic weyl-z2 semimetal, Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 (8) (Aug. 2025).doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)048. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2025)048

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)048 2025

  13. [13]

    X. Chen, X. Ji, Y.-W. Sun, Topological invariant for holographic weyl-nodal line coexisting semimetal, Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 (11) (Nov. 2025). doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)162. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2025)162 – 45 –

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)162 2025

  14. [14]

    X. Chen, X. Ji, Y.-W. Sun, Multipartite entanglement characterizing topological phase transitions in holographic nodal line semimetals (2026).arXiv:2602.01545. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01545

    arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Baggioli, D

    M. Baggioli, D. Giataganas, Detecting Topological Quantum Phase Transitions via the c-Function, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2) (2021) 026009.arXiv:2007.07273, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.026009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.026009 2021

  16. [16]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Liu, X.-M. Wu, Entanglement entropy as an order parameter for strongly coupled nodal line semimetals, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (5) (May 2023). doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)221. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)221

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)221 2023

  17. [17]

    Hayden, M

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick, A. Maloney, Holographic mutual information is monogamous, Physical Review D 87 (4) (Feb. 2013).doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.046003. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.046003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.046003 2013

  18. [18]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, Y.-T. Wang, Y. Zhao, More on the upper bound of holographic n-partite information, JHEP 03 (2025) 184.arXiv:2411.19207, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)184

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2025)184 2025

  19. [19]

    Ju, T.-Z

    X.-X. Ju, T.-Z. Lai, B.-H. Liu, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, Entanglement structures from modified ir geometry, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (7) (Jul. 2024). doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)181. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)181

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)181 2024

  20. [20]

    Ji, X.-X

    X. Ji, X.-X. Ju, Y.-W. Sun, Y.-T. Wang, H.-L. Zhou, Holographic geometry/real-space entanglement correspondence and metric reconstruction, Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 (9) (Sep. 2025).doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)081. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2025)081

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)081 2025

  21. [22]

    Ju, Y.-W

    X.-X. Ju, Y.-W. Sun, Y. Zhao, Upper bound of holographic entanglement entropy combinations, Journal of High Energy Physics 2025 (9) (Sep. 2025). doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)085. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2025)085

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2025)085 2025

  22. [23]

    Umemoto, T

    K. Umemoto, T. Takayanagi, Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Physics 14 (6) (2018) 573–577.doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0075-2. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0075-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0075-2 2018

  23. [24]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section

    S. Dutta, T. Faulkner, A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section (2019).arXiv:1905.00577,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)178. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00577

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)178 2019

  24. [25]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, Y. Zhao, Entanglement wedge cross section triangle information and holographic entanglement of assistance (2025).arXiv:2512.21679. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21679

    arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    Hayden, O

    P. Hayden, O. Parrikar, J. Sorce, The markov gap for geometric reflected entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (10) (Oct. 2021).doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)047. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)047 – 46 –

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)047 2021

  26. [27]

    Y. Zou, K. Siva, T. Soejima, R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, Universal tripartite entanglement in one-dimensional many-body systems, Physical Review Letters 126 (12) (Mar. 2021). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.120501. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.120501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.120501 2021

  27. [28]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna, T. Sharma, New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual, Physical Review D 106 (12) (Dec. 2022). doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.126001. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.126001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.126001 2022

  28. [29]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna, T. Sharma, Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (8) (Aug. 2023). doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)202. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)202

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)202 2023

  29. [30]

    Harper, T

    J. Harper, T. Takayanagi, T. Tsuda, Multi-entropy at low renyi index in 2d cfts, SciPost Physics 16 (5) (May 2024).doi:10.21468/scipostphys.16.5.125. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.125

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.16.5.125 2024

  30. [31]

    Gadde, J

    A. Gadde, J. Harper, V. Krishna, Multi-invariants and bulk replica symmetry (2025). arXiv:2411.00935,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)116. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00935

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)116 2025

  31. [32]

    Iizuka, A

    N. Iizuka, A. Miyata, The junction law for multipartite entanglement in confining holographic backgrounds (2026).arXiv:2604.10583. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10583

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [33]

    Balasubramanian, W

    V. Balasubramanian, W. K. L. Chan, M. J. Kang, C. Murdia, S. F. Ross, Constraints on four-party entanglement in holography (2026).arXiv:2606.00210. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00210

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [34]

    J. K. Basak, V. Malvimat, J. Yoon, A new genuine multipartite entanglement measure: from qubits to multiboundary wormholes (2025).arXiv:2411.11961. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11961

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    B. Ahn, J. K. Basak, K.-Y. Kim, G. B. Koo, V. Malvimat, J. Yoon, Probing the hierarchy of genuine multipartite entanglement with generalized latent entropy (2026). arXiv:2510.19922. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19922

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [36]

    Iizuka, M

    N. Iizuka, M. Nishida, Genuine multi-entropy and holography (2025).arXiv:2502.07995. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07995

    arXiv 2025

  36. [37]

    Iizuka, S

    N. Iizuka, S. Lin, M. Nishida, More on genuine multi-entropy and holography (2025). arXiv:2504.16589. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16589

    arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. J. Kang, C. Cummings, C. Murdia, S. F. Ross, Purely greenberger-horne-zeilinger-like entanglement is forbidden in holography, Physical Review Letters 136 (3) (Jan. 2026).doi:10.1103/g5rw-nvnr. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/g5rw-nvnr

    work page doi:10.1103/g5rw-nvnr 2026

  38. [39]

    Jiang, Y

    L. Jiang, Y. Liu, The holographic dual of the ghz state (2025).arXiv:2508.17898. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17898 – 47 –

    arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Jiang, Y

    L. Jiang, Y. Liu, Diving into booklet wormholes (2026).arXiv:2603.11459. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11459

    arXiv 2026

  40. [41]

    N. Bao, I. F. Halpern, Conditional and multipartite entanglements of purification and holography, Physical Review D 99 (4) (Feb. 2019).doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.046010. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.046010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.046010 2019

  41. [42]

    N. Bao, N. Cheng, Multipartite reflected entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (10) (Oct. 2019).doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)102. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)102

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)102 2019

  42. [43]

    N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies, G. N. Remmen, Entanglement of purification and multiboundary wormhole geometries, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2) (Feb. 2019). doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)110. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)110

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)110 2019

  43. [44]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, Y. Zhao, Holographic multipartite entanglement from the upper bound ofn-partite information (2024).arXiv:2411.07790. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07790

    arXiv 2024

  44. [45]

    Ju, B.-H

    X.-X. Ju, B.-H. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, B.-Y. Xu, Y. Zhao, Holographic multipartite entanglement structures in ir modified geometries (2025).arXiv:2512.20397. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20397

    arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    N. Bao, K. Furuya, J. Naskar, Tripartite correlation signal from multipartite entanglement of purification (2026).arXiv:2509.08209. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [47]

    P. Liu, C. Niu, J.-P. Wu, The effect of anisotropy on holographic entanglement entropy and mutual information, Physics Letters B 796 (2019) 155–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.035. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319304927

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.035 2019

  47. [48]

    X. Ji, Y. Liu, X.-M. Wu, Chiral vortical conductivity across a topological phase transition from holography, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126013.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.126013. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.126013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.126013 2019

  48. [49]

    R. C. Myers, A. Singh, Comments on holographic entanglement entropy and rg flows, Journal of High Energy Physics 2012 (4) (Apr. 2012).doi:10.1007/jhep04(2012)122. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2012)122

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2012)122 2012

  49. [50]

    H. Liu, M. Mezei, Probing renormalization group flows using entanglement entropy, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (1) (Jan. 2014).doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)098. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2014)098

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)098 2014

  50. [51]

    A. W. Peet, J. Polchinski, Uv-ir relations in ads dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 065011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.065011. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.065011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.065011 1999

  51. [52]

    de Oliveira, R

    G. de Oliveira, R. F. Costa, L. C. C´ eleri, R. Rougemont, Mutual information and holographic entanglement entropy for strongly coupledr-charged plasmas, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025) 066010.doi:10.1103/ylpl-96p1. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ylpl-96p1

    work page doi:10.1103/ylpl-96p1 2025

  52. [53]

    C.-S. Chu, D. Giataganas,c-Theorem for Anisotropic RG Flows from Holographic – 48 – Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. D 101 (4) (2020) 046007.arXiv:1906.09620, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.046007. – 49 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.046007 2020