pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06234 · v1 · pith:76ZFVXRDnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.IM

gr8stars II : judgement day for spectroscopic parameter model systematics

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords stellar parametersspectroscopic methodsexoplanet propertiesFGK dwarfsisochrone fittingsystematicsSOPHIE spectra
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scatter across five spectroscopic methods on 585 FGK stars induces at most 3% fractional uncertainty in exoplanet radii and 5% in masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies five different spectroscopic pipelines to the same high-quality spectra of 585 bright FGK dwarfs to measure effective temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity. It then feeds each set of results into isochrone fitting to obtain stellar masses, radii, and ages, and compares the resulting radii against independent values from spectral energy distribution fitting. The observed method-to-method scatter is propagated forward to show the impact on derived exoplanet parameters. A sympathetic reader would care because the exercise quantifies a previously under-reported noise floor that affects many exoplanet studies. The work concludes that the induced errors on planetary radius and mass remain smaller than values commonly quoted in the literature.

Core claim

Five spectroscopic methods yield typical scatters of 76 K in effective temperature, 0.14 dex in surface gravity, and 0.07 dex in metallicity; when propagated through isochrone fitting, these produce fractional uncertainties of ≲3% in planetary radius and ≲5% in planetary mass, with a lower limit of ≈4% on planetary equilibrium temperature uncertainty.

What carries the argument

The scatter among five spectroscopic parameter sets, propagated through isochrone-derived stellar masses and radii to exoplanet properties and compared against SED radii.

If this is right

  • Planetary radius uncertainties arising from spectroscopic method choice stay at or below 3 percent.
  • Planetary mass uncertainties arising from spectroscopic method choice stay at or below 5 percent.
  • Planetary equilibrium temperature carries a minimum fractional uncertainty of approximately 4 percent from this source alone.
  • These limits lie below the uncertainties typically reported for exoplanet parameters in the literature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other error sources such as orbital fitting or photometric calibration may now dominate the error budget in many exoplanet radius and mass determinations.
  • A combined analysis that averages or selects among multiple spectroscopic methods could reduce the effective scatter below the single-method values reported here.
  • The 4 percent floor on equilibrium temperature uncertainty would propagate directly into retrievals of planetary atmospheric properties and into assessments of potential habitability.

Load-bearing premise

The radii obtained by SED fitting in the companion paper form an independent benchmark free of shared systematics with the spectroscopic and isochrone results.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the SED radii and isochronal radii share common systematics larger than the reported method-to-method scatter would remove the basis for claiming the induced planetary uncertainties are truly below literature values.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06234 by Alix Violet Freckelton, Andreas J. Korn, Andreas Quirrenbach, Annelies Mortier, Arpita Roy, A. Su\'arez Mascare\~no, Christopher Allan Watson, Guy R. Davies, Jared R. Kolecki, J. I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez, John M. Brewer, Lars A. Buchhave, Lily L. Zhao, Maria Tsantaki, Martin B. Nielsen, Megan Bedell, Michael Cretignier, Nuno C. Santos, Sam Morrell, S\'ergio G. Sousa, Vera Maria Passegger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Histograms of the differences between results from each method and PASTEL for 𝑇eff, [Fe/H], and log 𝑔. The standard deviation (STD) and mean of these histograms is marked on each plot, with a grey dashed line representing 0 in each plot. Parameter RMSD Median Difference Median Uncertainty P A+M F Y MP P A+M F Y MP P A+M F Y MP Δ 𝑇eff (K) 94 94 90 89 101 -8 34 51 -14 -27 105 30 26 70 93 Δ [Fe/H] 0.08 0.10 0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The mean value from all spectral analysis codes in this work plotted against the PASTEL value for 𝑇eff (left), log 𝑔 (centre), and [Fe/H] (right). The pink line in all panels represents the one-to-one relationship. Lower panels show the residuals between the data sets. Y axes errors represent the standard deviation in the results from this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Differences in 𝑇eff from this work and those from PASTEL, coloured by the [Fe/H] from each method on the top row, and the PASTEL [Fe/H] on the second row. The top row additionally includes linear regression lines fitted to the data, as well as the Pearson Correlaton Coefficient (PCC) for the five sets of results. MNRAS 000, 1–19 (2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histograms of the whole-sample masses obtained using isochrones, with 𝑇eff and [Fe/H] from PAWS, ARES+MOOG, FASMA, YARARA, Metal Pipe, and the combined results. Grey dashed lines indicate the median of each distribution of results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of stellar ages across the sample from this work. Stellar ages were determined using isochrones, with results from inputting spectroscopic 𝑇eff and [Fe/H] from PAWS, ARES+MOOG, FASMA, YARARA, Metal Pipe, and the combined results. Grey dashed lines display the median age from each distribution of results. MNRAS 000, 1–19 (2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The difference between spectroscopic and fundamental (interfero￾metric) 𝑇eff for each method applied in this work, for each of the 6 stars in common with Soubiran et al. (2024). sults here are therefore within the broad expectations of comparing spectroscopic to interferometric 𝑇eff. An additional observation from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: First row : difference between the 𝑇eff derived by each method and the 𝑇eff from SED fitting, plotted against SED 𝑇eff. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) and regression lines are additionally included. Second row : Histograms of the differences between spectroscopic and SED 𝑇eff, with standard deviation (STD) and median values displayed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Difference between the log 𝑔 derived by each spectroscopic method and that from webSME, plotted against the webSME log 𝑔. This covers the 30 stars with the most discrepant log 𝑔 from the different spectroscopic methods. isochrones, and hence log 𝑔, are significantly model dependent and may not agree with empirical measurements (e.g. Boyajian et al. 2015). We additionally investigate whether the use of the … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Box-and-whisker plot of the log 𝑔 values determined by each code for the sample of 30 discrepant log 𝑔 targets, in addition to the log 𝑔 for these produced by only the equivalent widths section of PAWS. Open circles represent log 𝑔 values that extend beyond the minimum or maximum extremes of the data. 5.4 Microturbulent Velocity 𝑣mic An important consideration in our analysis is the influence of spectro￾sc… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Reduced chisquared of each forward-modelled spectrum when compared to the observed one, using the results from each method. This covers all 30 discrepant log 𝑔 targets. From the NASA Exoplanet Archive (Christiansen et al. 2025), the median fractional uncertainty on exoplanetary radius in the literature is 7.36%, higher than uncertainty predicted to arise from scatter in stellar radius alone. It is importa… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Histograms of the differences between the isochronal log 𝑔 for each method and the PASTEL log 𝑔, with standard deviation (STD) and median shown for each distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left panel : Difference between the log 𝑔 from the full PAWS pipeline and from the combined isochronal posteriors, plotted against PAWS 𝑇eff. Right panel : Difference between the log 𝑔 from the EW section of PAWS and the combined isochronal posteriors, plotted against the PAWS 𝑇eff. Both panels additionally show the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of the data, in addition to the fitted linear regres… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Histograms of the determined microturblent velocity (𝑣mic) from PAWS, FASMA, and ARES+MOOG. Each histogram also notes the standard deviation (STD) and median (Med.) values from each code [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The relationship between 𝑣mic and 𝑇eff for ARES+MOOG (left), PAWS (centre), and FASMA (right). The slope (m) and intercept (c) of the fitted linear regression lines are shown in the legend of each subplot. ity, we show that the precision errors often quoted for spectroscopic parameters are far outweighed by the scatter that comes from the use of different methods. Given that we consistently see disagreeme… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Differences in radii from each spectroscopic method + isochrones, and the radii from SED fitting, plotted against SED radius for each method. The lower right hand panel shows the results from combining all isochrones results. Four SED outliers have been removed from all of these plots. The Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) and linear regression lines fitted to the data are shown in each panel. look pa… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many areas of astrophysics, including exoplanetary studies, rely on precise and accurate stellar parameters. This demands that uncertainties on these parameters truly reflect all biases and systematics. Within this second work of the \texttt{gr8stars} collaboration, we take a set of 585 bright FGK dwarfs with high resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio spectra from the SOPHIE spectrograph. We determine stellar effective temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity using five different spectroscopic methods for each star, with an additional method used for comparisons. We find a typical scatter of 76 K in \teff, 0.14 dex in \logg, and 0.07 dex in \feh. These deviations are significantly larger than the average precision error on these parameters. We furthermore use isochrone fitting to determine mass, radius, and age for all 585 stars, using input from all results. We use the radii determined by SED fitting in the first \texttt{gr8stars} paper as a comparison to our isochronal radii from this work, in addition to comparing the isochronal \logg to spectroscopic \logg. The scatter in mass and radius from the use of different spectroscopic methods is investigated and propagated to exoplanetary parameters. The induced fractional uncertainties in planetary radius ($\lesssim$ 3 \%) and mass ($\lesssim$ 5\%) are found to be below those typically found in the literature. We estimate a lower limit on planetary equilibrium temperature fractional uncertainty of $\approx$ 4\%, a noise floor that is currently not sufficiently represented in the literature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes spectroscopic parameters (Teff, log g, [Fe/H]) for 585 bright FGK dwarfs from SOPHIE spectra using five methods, reporting typical scatters of 76 K, 0.14 dex, and 0.07 dex. It performs isochrone fitting for masses, radii, and ages using these inputs, compares the resulting radii to SED-fitting radii from the companion gr8stars I paper (and isochronal vs. spectroscopic log g), and propagates the method-to-method scatter to estimate induced fractional uncertainties on exoplanet radius (≲3%), mass (≲5%), and a lower limit of ≈4% on equilibrium temperature.

Significance. If the benchmark comparison is independent, the work provides a concrete quantification of how spectroscopic method choice propagates to stellar and planetary parameters in a large, homogeneous sample. The finding that these systematics are smaller than typical literature values could help establish realistic uncertainty floors for exoplanet studies; the multi-method approach on 585 stars is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [the isochrone fitting and gr8stars I comparison section] The section describing the comparison of isochronal radii to SED-fitting radii from gr8stars I (and the propagation of scatters to planetary parameters): the central claim that the observed scatters (76 K, 0.14 dex, 0.07 dex) induce the quoted ≲3%/≲5%/≈4% fractional uncertainties on planetary radius/mass/Teq rests on treating the SED radii as an independent benchmark. The manuscript provides no quantitative test (e.g., overlap in photometry, model grids, or calibration steps) that the two pipelines are free of shared systematics; without this, the benchmark cannot independently confirm that the spectroscopic scatter is the dominant, well-quantified systematic.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'an additional method [is] used for comparisons' but does not identify the method or its role; this should be clarified in the methods section for reproducibility.
  2. [results on planetary uncertainties] The propagation to planetary parameters is described only at the level of the abstract; a dedicated subsection or table showing the exact error-propagation steps (including any assumptions on stellar mass/radius correlations) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and the opportunity to clarify aspects of our analysis. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [the isochrone fitting and gr8stars I comparison section] The section describing the comparison of isochronal radii to SED-fitting radii from gr8stars I (and the propagation of scatters to planetary parameters): the central claim that the observed scatters (76 K, 0.14 dex, 0.07 dex) induce the quoted ≲3%/≲5%/≈4% fractional uncertainties on planetary radius/mass/Teq rests on treating the SED radii as an independent benchmark. The manuscript provides no quantitative test (e.g., overlap in photometry, model grids, or calibration steps) that the two pipelines are free of shared systematics; without this, the benchmark cannot independently confirm that the spectroscopic scatter is the dominant, well-quantified systematic.

    Authors: The fractional uncertainties on planetary radius (≲3%), mass (≲5%), and equilibrium temperature (≈4%) are derived solely from the observed method-to-method scatter among the five spectroscopic pipelines applied to the SOPHIE spectra (76 K in Teff, 0.14 dex in log g, 0.07 dex in [Fe/H]). These scatters are measured internally to the spectroscopic analysis and propagated through isochrone fitting; the gr8stars I SED radii are used only as an external consistency check for the resulting isochrone radii and for comparing isochronal versus spectroscopic log g. They play no role in quantifying or propagating the scatters themselves. We will revise the manuscript to state this distinction explicitly and to add a short discussion of why the spectroscopic and SED approaches are expected to have limited shared systematics (distinct input data—high-resolution spectra versus broadband photometry—and different modeling frameworks). This addresses the concern without requiring new quantitative overlap tests. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from measured method scatter and propagation is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper measures inter-method scatter (76 K, 0.14 dex, 0.07 dex) across five spectroscopic pipelines on the same 585 spectra, performs isochrone fitting on those inputs, and directly propagates the resulting mass/radius scatter to planetary parameters to obtain the ≲3 % / ≲5 % / ≈4 % figures. The gr8stars I SED radii appear only as an external comparison benchmark (abstract: "We use the radii determined by SED fitting in the first gr8stars paper as a comparison to our isochronal radii from this work"), not as an input that defines or forces the reported scatters or propagated uncertainties. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted quantity by construction, and the central result does not rest on a self-citation chain. The derivation is therefore independent of the benchmark comparison.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard stellar-evolution models and the assumption that SED radii are independent of spectroscopic results; no new free parameters or entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Isochrone models provide reliable mass, radius, and age estimates when supplied with spectroscopic Teff, log g, and [Fe/H].
    Invoked when converting the five sets of spectroscopic parameters into isochronal masses, radii, and ages for all 585 stars.
  • domain assumption SED-fitting radii from the companion paper are independent of the spectroscopic methods tested here.
    Used as the external benchmark for isochronal radii and for the log g comparison.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5938 in / 1454 out tokens · 13694 ms · 2026-06-27T23:29:35.993530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · 55 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Stellar Activity Masquerading as Planets in the Habitable Zone of the M dwarf Gliese 581

    Stellar activity masquerading as planets in the habitable zone of the M dwarf Gliese 581. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1253253 , archivePrefix =. 1407.1049 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Metal Pipe: A Broadly Applicable Stellar Abundance Pipeline Using Isochronal Parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3c0b , archivePrefix =. 2601.10794 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    Determining stellar macroturbulence using asteroseismic rotational velocities from Kepler

    Determining stellar macroturbulence using asteroseismic rotational velocities from Kepler. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1692 , archivePrefix =. 1408.3988 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    A new extensive library of PHOENIX stellar atmospheres and synthetic spectra

    A new extensive library of PHOENIX stellar atmospheres and synthetic spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219058 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5632 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    Using the Sun to estimate Earth-like planet detection capabilities. VI. Simulation of granulation and supergranulation radial velocity and photometric time series. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525721 , adsurl =

  6. [6]

    RASSINE: Interactive tool for normalising stellar spectra. I. Description and performance of the code. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037722 , archivePrefix =. 2006.13098 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    YARARA: Significant improvement in RV precision through post-processing of spectral time series. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140986 , archivePrefix =. 2106.07301 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    YARARA V2: Reaching sub-m s ^ -1 precision over a decade using PCA on line-by-line radial velocities. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347232 , archivePrefix =. 2308.11812 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    Defining better activity proxies

    Stellar surface information from the Ca II H&K lines - II. Defining better activity proxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2508 , archivePrefix =. 2411.00557 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    State of the Field: Extreme Precision Radial Velocities

    State of the Field: Extreme Precision Radial Velocities. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/066001 , archivePrefix =. 1602.07939 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    Characterisation of the radial velocity signal induced by rotation in late-type dwarfs

    Characterization of the radial velocity signal induced by rotation in late-type dwarfs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx771 , archivePrefix =. 1703.08884 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    Measuring the masses of the two transiting planets

    One year of AU Mic with HARPS - I. Measuring the masses of the two transiting planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac614 , archivePrefix =. 2203.01750 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Stellar signal components seen in HARPS and HARPS-N solar radial velocities. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244663 , archivePrefix =. 2211.04251 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    The PLATO 2.0 Mission

    The PLATO 2.0 mission. Experimental Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10686-014-9383-4 , archivePrefix =. 1310.0696 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    On the Feasibility of Intense Radial Velocity Surveys for Earth-twin Discoveries

    On the Feasibility of Intense Radial Velocity Surveys for Earth-Twin Discoveries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1464 , archivePrefix =. 1806.00518 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    HARPS3 for a Roboticized Isaac Newton Telescope

    HARPS3 for a roboticized Isaac Newton Telescope. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI , year = 2016, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2232111 , archivePrefix =. 1608.04611 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Target Prioritization and Observing Strategies for the NEID Earth Twin Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd79e , archivePrefix =. 2101.11689 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    The NEID Earth Twin Survey. I. Confirmation of a 31 Day Planet Orbiting HD 86728. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad89bf , archivePrefix =. 2409.12315 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X , year = 2024, editor =

    Development and design of Second Earth Initiative Spectrograph (2ES). Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3019107 , adsurl =

  20. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Extreme Precision Radial Velocity Working Group Final Report. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2107.14291 , archivePrefix =. 2107.14291 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Catalog for the ESPRESSO blind radial velocity exoplanet survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834729 , archivePrefix =. 1908.04627 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Search for lithium-rich giants in 32 open clusters with high-resolution spectroscopy★. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244374 , archivePrefix =. 2303.16124 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    Constraining planet structure and composition from stellar chemistry: trends in different stellar populations

    Constraining planet structure and composition from stellar chemistry: trends in different stellar populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731359 , archivePrefix =. 1711.00777 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    New and updated stellar parameters for 71 evolved planet hosts. On the metallicity - giant planet connection

    New and updated stellar parameters for 71 evolved planet hosts. On the metallicity-giant planet connection. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321641 , archivePrefix =. 1307.7870 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    Three regimes of extrasolar planets inferred from host star metallicities

    Three regimes of extrasolar planet radius inferred from host star metallicities. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature13254 , archivePrefix =. 1405.7695 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    Science , keywords =

    A compositional link between rocky exoplanets and their host stars. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.abg8794 , archivePrefix =. 2102.12444 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database

    The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/589654 , archivePrefix =. 0804.4473 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    Homogeneous stellar analysis of potential circumbinary planet hosts

    BEBOP V. Homogeneous stellar analysis of potential circumbinary planet hosts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1405 , archivePrefix =. 2406.03094 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =

    FIES: The high-resolution Fiber-fed Echelle Spectrograph at the Nordic Optical Telescope. Astronomische Nachrichten , keywords =. doi:10.1002/asna.201312007 , adsurl =

  30. [30]

    The SOPHIE search for northern extrasolar planets . I. A companion around HD 16760 with mass close to the planet/brown-dwarf transition. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912427 , adsurl =

  31. [31]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =

    The SOPHIE spectrograph: design and technical key-points for high throughput and high stability. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.787379 , adsurl =

  32. [32]

    Determining stellar atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances of FGK stars with iSpec

    Determining stellar atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances of FGK stars with iSpec. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 , archivePrefix =. 1407.2608 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    Modern stellar spectroscopy caveats

    Modern stellar spectroscopy caveats. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz549 , archivePrefix =. 1902.09558 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

    ATLAS12, SYNTHE, ATLAS9, WIDTH9, et cetera. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

  35. [35]

    ATLAS and SYNTHE under Linux

    ATLAS and SYNTHE under Linux. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0406268 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406268 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    The Calibration of MK Spectral Classes Using Spectral Synthesis. I. The Effective Temperature Calibration of Dwarf Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/116893 , adsurl =

  37. [37]

    Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

    NIST atomic spectra database. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

  38. [38]

    isochrones: Stellar model grid package

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). , keywords =. doi:10.1086/498708 , adsurl =

  40. [40]

    Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products

  41. [41]

    Improved spectroscopic parameters for transiting planet hosts

    Improved Spectroscopic Parameters for Transiting Planet Hosts. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/161 , archivePrefix =. 1208.1268 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    Correcting the spectroscopic surface gravity using transits and asteroseismology. No significant effect on temperatures or metallicities with ARES+MOOG in LTE

    Correcting the spectroscopic surface gravity using transits and asteroseismology. No significant effect on temperatures or metallicities with ARES and MOOG in local thermodynamic equilibrium. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424537 , archivePrefix =. 1410.1310 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    K2-111: an old system with two planets in near-resonance. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3144 , archivePrefix =. 2010.01993 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the Construction of Stellar Isochrones. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , archivePrefix =. 1601.05144 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    ``The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres, 3rd Edition, by D.F

    The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. ``The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres, 3rd Edition, by D.F. Gray. ISBN 0521851866. <A href=''http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521851866. Cambridge``>http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521851866. Cambridge</A>, UK: Cambridge University Pre...

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Fundamental T _ eff and log g of the third version. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347136 , archivePrefix =. 2310.11302 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    Stellar Diameters and Temperatures. I. Main-sequence A, F, and G Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/101 , archivePrefix =. 1112.3316 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Fundamental Parameters of 87 Stars from the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer

    Fundamental Parameters of 87 Stars from the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9d8b , archivePrefix =. 1712.08109 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    Surveying the Bright Stars by Optical Interferometry. II. A Volume-limited Multiplicity Survey of Main-sequence F Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab32e1 , adsurl =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Speckle interferometric observations of binary systems with the Hte-Provence 1.93 M telescope. , keywords =

  51. [51]

    Mn abundances in the stars of the Galactic disc with metallicities -1.0 < [Fe/H] < 0.3

    Mn abundances in the stars of the Galactic disc with metallicities -1.0 < [Fe/H] < 0.3. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2038 , archivePrefix =. 1509.05341 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Li abundances & vsini for star-planet systems (Gonzalez+, 2010)

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Homogeneous abundance analysis of FGK dwarf, subgiant, and giant stars with and without giant planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525770 , adsurl =

  54. [54]

    Abundances in the Local Region II: F, G and K Dwarfs and Subgiants

    Abundances in the Local Region II: F, G, and K Dwarfs and Subgiants. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/21 , archivePrefix =. 1611.02897 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    Oxygen Abundances in Nearby Stars. Clues to the formation and evolution of the Galactic disk

    Oxygen abundances in nearby stars. Clues to the formation and evolution of the Galactic disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066619 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0701362 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    New constraints on the chemical evolution of the solar neighbourhood and Galactic disc(s). Improved astrophysical parameters for the Geneva-Copenhagen Survey

    New constraints on the chemical evolution of the solar neighbourhood and Galactic disc(s). Improved astrophysical parameters for the Geneva-Copenhagen Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016276 , archivePrefix =. 1103.4651 , primaryClass =

  57. [57]

    Spectroscopic Parameters and atmosphEric ChemIstriEs of Stars (SPECIES). I. Code description and dwarf stars catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731533 , archivePrefix =. 1801.09698 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2 - Binarity from proper motion anomaly

    Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2. Binarity from proper motion anomaly. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 , archivePrefix =. 1811.08902 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    The Gaia mission

    The Gaia mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , archivePrefix =. 1609.04153 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , archivePrefix =. 2208.00211 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    and Amarsi, A

    The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , archivePrefix =. 2105.01661 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Atomic data for the Gaia-ESO Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936291 , archivePrefix =. 2011.02049 , primaryClass =

  63. [63]

    Improving Stellar and Planetary Parameters of Transiting Planet Systems: The Case of TrES-2

    Improving Stellar and Planetary Parameters of Transiting Planet Systems: The Case of TrES-2. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/519214 , archivePrefix =. 0704.2938 , primaryClass =

  64. [64]

    Spectroscopic Properties of Cool Stars (SPOCS). I. 1040 F, G, and K Dwarfs from Keck, Lick, and AAT Planet Search Programs. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/430500 , adsurl =

  65. [65]

    The PASTEL catalogue: 2016 version

    The PASTEL catalogue: 2016 version. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628497 , archivePrefix =. 1605.07384 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    A Guide to Realistic Uncertainties on the Fundamental Properties of Solar-type Exoplanet Host Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbc , archivePrefix =. 2012.07957 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Exploring the M-dwarf Luminosity-Temperature-Radius relationships using Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2242 , archivePrefix =. 1908.03025 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Erratum: Exploring the M-dwarf Luminosity-Temperature-Radius relationships using Gaia DR2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa926 , adsurl =

  69. [69]

    SWEET-Cat: A catalogue of parameters for Stars With ExoplanETs. I. New atmospheric parameters and masses for 48 stars with planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321286 , archivePrefix =. 1307.0354 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    Determination of Atmospheric Parameters of B , publisher =

    ARES + MOOG: A Practical Overview of an Equivalent Width (EW) Method to Derive Stellar Parameters. Determination of Atmospheric Parameters , publisher =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06956-2_26 , adsurl =

  71. [71]

    Higher quality spectra and precise parallaxes from Gaia eDR3

    SWEET-Cat 2.0: The Cat just got SWEETer. Higher quality spectra and precise parallaxes from Gaia eDR3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141584 , archivePrefix =. 2109.04781 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    A new code for automatic determination of equivalent widths: Automatic Routine for line Equivalent widths in stellar Spectra (ARES)

    A new code for automatic determination of equivalent widths: Automatic Routine for line Equivalent widths in stellar Spectra (ARES). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077288 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703696 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    ARES v2 - new features and improved performance

    ARES v2: new features and improved performance. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425463 , archivePrefix =. 1504.02725 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    Spectroscopic parameters for 451 stars in the HARPS GTO planet search program. Stellar [Fe/H] and the frequency of exo-Neptunes

    Spectroscopic parameters for 451 stars in the HARPS GTO planet search program. Stellar [Fe/H] and the frequency of exo-Neptunes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809698 , archivePrefix =. 0805.4826 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    SYNTHE spectrum synthesis programs and line data

  76. [76]

    Carbon and Nitrogen Abundances in Metal-Poor Stars

  77. [77]

    Deriving precise parameters for cool solar-type stars. Optimizing the iron line list

    Deriving precise parameters for cool solar-type stars. Optimizing the iron line list. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321103 , archivePrefix =. 1304.6639 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    aren, mit besonderer Ber\

    Physik der Sternatmosph\"aren, mit besonderer Ber\"ucksichtigung der Sonne. Berlin, Springer, 1955. 2. Aufl. Berlin, Springer, 1955. 2. Aufl. , year = 1955, adsurl =

  79. [79]

    Atmospheric stellar parameters for large surveys using FASMA, a new spectral synthesis package

    Atmospheric stellar parameters for large surveys using FASMA, a new spectral synthesis package. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2564 , archivePrefix =. 1710.00260 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =

    FASMA 2.0: A Python package for stellar parameters and chemical abundances. The Journal of Open Source Software , keywords =. doi:10.21105/joss.02048 , adsurl =

Showing first 80 references.