pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06436 · v1 · pith:A6RTKLV3new · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th

Probing anomalous quartic gauge couplings in same-sign W boson scattering with polarization and spin correlation

Oscar J. P. \'Eboli , Rafiqul Rahaman , Amir Subba This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-th
keywords anomalous quartic gauge couplingssame-sign WW scatteringvector boson scatteringSMEFTspin correlationspolarization asymmetriesLHC
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-correlation asymmetries in same-sign W scattering match the sensitivity of transverse mass distributions for anomalous quartic gauge couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates anomalous quartic gauge couplings in same-sign W boson production through vector boson scattering at the LHC within the SMEFT framework. It incorporates polarization and spin-correlation effects via angular asymmetries alongside standard kinematic variables. The authors show that these asymmetries achieve sensitivity to the anomalous WWWW interactions similar to that of the transverse mass distribution, and that a small number of them suffice to capture most of the constraining power. When combined with kinematic information, the limits on the Wilson coefficients improve, and unitarity considerations are addressed through invariant-mass cuts.

Core claim

In the SMEFT framework, angular asymmetries derived from the polarization and spin correlations of the W bosons in same-sign WW scattering provide constraints on the anomalous WWWW couplings that are comparable in strength to those from the transverse mass distribution of the WW system. A minimal set of these asymmetries captures the dominant sensitivity, and their combination with kinematic information yields improved limits on the Wilson coefficients. Imposing invariant-mass cut-offs on the WW system identifies unitarity-safe regions for the anomalous couplings.

What carries the argument

Angular asymmetries encoding the polarization and spin correlations of the produced W bosons.

If this is right

  • Spin-correlation asymmetries provide sensitivity to anomalous WWWW interactions comparable to the transverse mass distribution.
  • A minimal set of the most sensitive asymmetries captures the dominant constraints on the Wilson coefficients.
  • A combined analysis of angular asymmetries and kinematic information leads to improved limits compared to either approach alone.
  • Invariant-mass cut-offs on the WW system determine unitarity-safe regions for the anomalous couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could be extended to other vector boson scattering channels to obtain cross-checks on the same quartic couplings.
  • At higher integrated luminosities the reduced set of asymmetries might allow experimental analyses to retain most sensitivity while simplifying event selection.
  • The results suggest that full angular information can help separate the effects of different dimension-8 operators in future global EFT fits.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the SMEFT truncation remains valid in the kinematic region studied and that Monte Carlo simulations accurately capture the interference between Standard Model and anomalous contributions.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the limits from spin asymmetries are significantly weaker than from the transverse mass distribution, or that the combined limits do not improve, would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06436 by Amir Subba, Oscar J. P. \'Eboli, Rafiqul Rahaman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative leading-order Feynman diagrams for VBS production of same-sign [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Normalized parton level distributions for leptonic angular variables related to the polarization and spin correlations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. aQGC-sensitive kinematic distributions at detector level for an integrated luminosity of 3 ab [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. aQGC-sensitive normalized angular distributions related to the polarization and spin correlations of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. One-parameter ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. One-parameter ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Two-parameter 95% C.L. contours obtained using asymmetries, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. One-parameter 95% C.L. intervals for just one non-vanishing WC as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The study of quartic couplings of electroweak gauge bosons not only provides a test of the Standard Model (SM) predictions, but also can look for signals of new physics beyond the SM. We present a comprehensive study of anomalous quartic gauge couplings in same-sign $W^\pm W^\pm$ production via vector boson scattering at the LHC. The analysis is carried out within the framework of the SM Effective Field Theory, exploiting polarization and spin-correlation effects encoded in angular asymmetries in addition to conventional kinematic observables. We demonstrate that spin-correlation asymmetries provide sensitivity to anomalous $WWWW$ interactions that is comparable to that obtained from the transverse mass distribution of the $WW$ system. By identifying a minimal set of the most sensitive asymmetries, we show that the dominant constraints on the Wilson coefficients can be captured with a reduced number of observables. A combined analysis of angular asymmetries and kinematic information leads to improved limits compared to either approach alone. The impact of unitarity considerations is also examined by imposing invariant-mass cut-offs on the $WW$ system, allowing us to determine unitarity-safe regions for the anomalous couplings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical study of anomalous quartic gauge couplings (aQGCs) in same-sign W±W± vector boson scattering at the LHC within the SMEFT framework. It examines polarization and spin-correlation effects via angular asymmetries in addition to standard kinematic observables such as the transverse mass m_T(WW). The central claims are that selected spin-correlation asymmetries yield sensitivity to dimension-8 WWWW operators comparable to m_T(WW), that a minimal subset of these asymmetries captures the dominant constraints on the Wilson coefficients, and that a combined angular-plus-kinematic analysis improves the resulting limits. Unitarity is addressed by imposing invariant-mass cut-offs on the WW system.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work would be of moderate significance for LHC VBS analyses: it supplies concrete evidence that angular asymmetries can be used to probe dimension-8 operators with sensitivity comparable to conventional kinematic variables and that a reduced observable set suffices for the leading constraints. Explicit discussion of unitarity cuts is a positive feature that helps delineate the validity region of the EFT.

major comments (1)
  1. The provided manuscript text supplies no information on the Monte Carlo event generation, parton-shower settings, statistical procedure for extracting limits, or treatment of systematic uncertainties. These elements are load-bearing for the central numerical claims of comparable sensitivity and improved combined limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the point raised below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The provided manuscript text supplies no information on the Monte Carlo event generation, parton-shower settings, statistical procedure for extracting limits, or treatment of systematic uncertainties. These elements are load-bearing for the central numerical claims of comparable sensitivity and improved combined limits.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not currently provide explicit details on the Monte Carlo event generation, parton-shower settings, the statistical procedure for extracting limits, or the treatment of systematic uncertainties. These aspects are essential to support the robustness of the reported sensitivities and combined limits. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection describing the simulation framework, including the generator and settings used for same-sign WW VBS production, parton-shower and hadronization parameters, the statistical method applied to derive Wilson-coefficient limits (e.g., chi-squared or profile-likelihood analysis of the binned distributions), and the treatment (or explicit neglect) of systematic uncertainties in this theoretical study. This addition will allow readers to fully assess the numerical results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical simulation study is self-contained

full rationale

The paper is a Monte Carlo-based phenomenological analysis of angular asymmetries and kinematic observables in same-sign WW scattering within SMEFT. Central results (comparable sensitivity of spin-correlation asymmetries to m_T(WW), and improved limits from combined observables) are obtained by generating events, applying cuts, and computing statistical sensitivities; these steps do not reduce to any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or to a self-citation chain. No derivation equates an output to its input by construction, no ansatz is smuggled via citation, and unitarity cuts are applied explicitly. The analysis stands on external simulation tools and standard SMEFT operator definitions rather than internal self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the SMEFT framework at LHC energies, the accuracy of Monte Carlo modeling of VBS, and the appropriateness of invariant-mass cutoffs for unitarity; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption SMEFT is the appropriate low-energy description of possible new physics in the electroweak sector
    Stated in the abstract as the framework for the analysis.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo generators correctly model polarization and spin correlations in VBS processes
    Implicit in the use of angular asymmetries derived from simulated events.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5739 in / 1328 out tokens · 24138 ms · 2026-06-28T00:20:16.724140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quartic Gauge Boson Couplings

    S. Godfrey, Quartic gauge boson couplings, AIP Conf. Proc.350, 209 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9505252

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    Belanger and F

    G. Belanger and F. Boudjema, Probing quartic couplings of weak bosons through three vectors production at a 500-GeV NLC, Phys. Lett.B288, 201 (1992)

    1992

  3. [3]

    P. J. Dervan, A. Signer, W. J. Stirling, and A. Werthen- bach, Anomalous triple and quartic gauge boson cou- plings, J. Phys. G26, 607 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0002175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, S. M. Lietti, and S. F. Novaes, Anomalous quartic gauge boson couplings at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev.D63, 075008 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009262 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    A search for WW gamma and WZ gamma production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Search forW W γandW Zγ production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings inppcollisions at √s= 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D90, 032008 (2014), arXiv:1404.4619 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Evidence of $W\gamma\gamma$ production in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Evidence ofW γγProduction in pp Collisions at √s= 8 TeV and Limits on Anoma- lous Quartic Gauge Couplings with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 031802 (2015), arXiv:1503.03243 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Study of $WW\gamma$ and $WZ\gamma$ production in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV and search for anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS experiment

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Study ofW W γand W Zγproduction inppcollisions at √s= 8 TeV and search for anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J.C77, 646 (2017), arXiv:1707.05597 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of the pp →W γγand pp→Zγγcross sections and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings at√s= 8 TeV, JHEP 10, 072, arXiv:1704.00366 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Belanger and F

    G. Belanger and F. Boudjema,γγ→W+W−andγγ→ ZZas tests of novel quartic couplings, Phys. Lett.B288, 210 (1992)

    1992

  10. [10]

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Study of Exclusive Two- Photon Production ofW +W − inppCollisions at √s= 7 TeV and Constraints on Anomalous Quartic Gauge Cou- plings, JHEP07, 116, arXiv:1305.5596 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Evidence for exclusive γγ→W +W − production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings inppcollisions at √s= 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP08, 119, arXiv:1604.04464 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    A. S. Belyaev, O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, J. K. Mizukoshi, S. F. Novaes, and I. Zacharov, Strongly interacting vector bosons at the CERN LHC: Quartic anomalous couplings, Phys. Rev. D59, 015022 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9805229

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and S. M. Lietti, Bosonic quartic couplings at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D69, 095005 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310141 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Measurement of electroweak-induced production of Wγwith two jets in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, JHEP06, 106, arXiv:1612.09256 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [16]

    D. R. Green, P. Meade, and M.-A. Pleier, Multiboson interactions at the LHC, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035008 (2017), arXiv:1610.07572 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [17]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurement ofW ±W ± vector-boson scattering and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurement ofW ±W ± vector-boson scattering and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 96, 012007 (2017), arXiv:1611.02428 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  17. [18]

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of Zγin association with two jets and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in proton–proton collisions at √s= 8 TeV, Phys. Lett.B770, 380 (2017), arXiv:1702.03025 [hep-ex]. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [19]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton colli- sions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 081801 (2018), arXiv:1709.05822 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [20]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of vector bo- son scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic cou- plings from events with four leptons and two jets in pro- ton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett.B774, 682 (2017), arXiv:1708.02812 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [21]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Search for anomalous elec- troweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett.B798, 134985 (2019), arXiv:1905.07445 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [22]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a Z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings, JHEP 06, 076, arXiv:2002.09902 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2002

  22. [23]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton- proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B812, 135992 (2021), arXiv:2008.07013 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [24]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of produc- tion cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B809, 135710 (2020), arXiv:2005.01173 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [25]

    Hwang, U

    H. Hwang, U. Min, J. Park, M. Son, and J. H. Yoo, Anomalous triple gauge couplings in electroweak dilepton tails at the LHC and interference resurrection, JHEP08, 069, arXiv:2301.13663 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  25. [26]

    Anomalous quartic gauge couplings and unitarization for the vector boson scattering process $pp\rightarrow W^+W^+jjX\rightarrow \ell^+\nu_\ell\ell^+\nu_\ell jjX$

    G. Perez, M. Sekulla, and D. Zeppenfeld, Anomalous quartic gauge couplings and unitarization for the vec- tor boson scattering processpp→W +W +jjX→ ℓ+νℓℓ+νℓjjX, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 759 (2018), arXiv:1807.02707 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [27]

    E. d. S. Almeida, O. J. P. ´Eboli, and M. C. Gonza- lez–Garcia, Unitarity constraints on anomalous quar- tic couplings, Phys. Rev. D101, 113003 (2020), arXiv:2004.05174 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [28]

    Evidence for Electroweak Production of $W^{\pm}W^{\pm}jj$ in $pp$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS Detector

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Evidence for Electroweak Pro- duction ofW ±W ±jjinppCollisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 141803 (2014), arXiv:1405.6241 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [29]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Observation of electroweak production of a same-signWboson pair in association with two jets inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Observation of electroweak production of a same-signWboson pair in association with two jets inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 161801 (2019), arXiv:1906.03203 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  29. [30]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement and interpretation of same-sign W boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP04, 026, arXiv:2312.00420 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  30. [31]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Evidence for Longitudinally Po- larized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same- Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111802 (2025), arXiv:2503.11317 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Study of vector boson scattering and search for new physics in events with two same-sign leptons and two jets

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Study of vector boson scat- tering and search for new physics in events with two same-sign leptons and two jets, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 051801 (2015), arXiv:1410.6315 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [33]

    First measurements of vector boson scattering in W$^\pm$W$^{\pm}$ and WZ production in all-leptonic final states at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV

    A. Gevorgyanet al.(CMS), First measurements of vec- tor boson scattering in W ±W± and WZ production in all-leptonic final states at √s= 13.6 TeV, (2026), arXiv:2605.15396 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [34]

    B. Fuks, J. Neundorf, K. Peters, R. Ruiz, and M. Saim- pert, Majorana neutrinos in same-signW ±W ± scatter- ing at the LHC: Breaking the TeV barrier, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055005 (2021), arXiv:2011.02547 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [35]

    Ballestrero, E

    A. Ballestrero, E. Maina, and G. Pelliccioli, Differ- ent polarization definitions in same-signW Wscatter- ing at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B811, 135856 (2020), arXiv:2007.07133 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [36]

    M. Aoki, K. Enomoto, and S. Kanemura, Probing charged lepton number violation viaℓ ±ℓ′±W ∓W ∓, Phys. Rev. D101, 115019 (2020), arXiv:2002.12265 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [37]

    Chaudhary, J

    G. Chaudhary, J. Kalinowski, M. Kaur, P. Koz´ ow, K. Sandeep, M. Szleper, and S. Tkaczyk, EFT trian- gles in the same-signW Wscattering process at the HL- LHC and HE-LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 181 (2020), arXiv:1906.10769 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [38]

    Same-sign WW scattering at the LHC: can we discover BSM effects before discovering new states?

    J. Kalinowski, P. Koz´ ow, S. Pokorski, J. Rosiek, M. Szleper, and S. Tkaczyk, Same-sign WW scattering at the LHC: can we discover BSM effects before dis- covering new states?, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 403 (2018), arXiv:1802.02366 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [39]

    Ballestreroet al., Precise predictions for same-sign W-boson scattering at the LHC, Eur

    A. Ballestreroet al., Precise predictions for same-sign W-boson scattering at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 671 (2018), arXiv:1803.07943 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  39. [40]

    Denner, C

    A. Denner, C. Haitz, and G. Pelliccioli, NLO EW and QCD corrections to polarised same-sign WW scattering at the LHC, JHEP11, 115, arXiv:2409.03620 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  40. [41]

    J¨ ager and S

    B. J¨ ager and S. L. P. Chavez, Electroweak W +W+ production in association with three jets at NLO QCD matched with parton shower, JHEP01, 075, arXiv:2408.12314 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  41. [42]

    Dittmaier, P

    S. Dittmaier, P. Maierh¨ ofer, C. Schwan, and R. Winter- halder, Like-sign W-boson scattering at the LHC — ap- proximations and full next-to-leading-order predictions, JHEP11, 022, arXiv:2308.16716 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  42. [43]

    Leader,Spin in Particle Physics, Vol

    E. Leader,Spin in Particle Physics, Vol. 15 (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    2001

  43. [44]

    A model independent spin analysis of fundamental particles using azimuthal asymmetries

    F. Boudjema and R. K. Singh, A Model independent spin analysis of fundamental particles using azimuthal asym- metries, JHEP07, 028, arXiv:0903.4705 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [46]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B716, 30 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235 [hep- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [47]

    Monte Carlo tools for studies of non-standard electroweak gauge boson interactions in multi-boson processes: A Snowmass White Paper

    C. Degrande, O. Eboli, B. Feigl, B. J¨ ager, W. Kil- ian, O. Mattelaer, M. Rauch, J. Reuter, M. Sekulla, and D. Wackeroth, Monte Carlo tools for studies of non-standard electroweak gauge boson interactions in multi-boson processes: A Snowmass White Paper, in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi(2013) arXiv:1309.7890 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [48]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Weak Inter- actions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. D16, 1519 (1977). 15

    1977

  48. [49]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 321 (1964)

    1964

  49. [50]

    P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 508 (1964)

    1964

  50. [51]

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 585 (1964)

    1964

  51. [52]

    O. J. P. Eboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and J. K. Mizukoshi,pp→jje ±mu±ννandjje ±mu∓ννat O(α6 em) andO(α 6 emα2 s) for the study of the quartic elec- troweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D74, 073005 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [53]

    O. J. P. ´Eboli and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D93, 093013 (2016), arXiv:1604.03555 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [54]

    Bourrely, J

    C. Bourrely, J. Soffer, and E. Leader, Polarization Phe- nomena in Hadronic Reactions, Phys. Rept.59, 95 (1980)

    1980

  54. [55]

    Rahaman and R

    R. Rahaman and R. K. Singh, Breaking down the entire spectrum of spin correlations of a pair of particles in- volving fermions and gauge bosons, Nucl. Phys. B984, 115984 (2022), arXiv:2109.09345 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [56]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07, 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [57]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012), arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [58]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A Brief Intro- duction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 852 (2008), arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [59]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaitre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simu- lation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02, 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 903 (2018), arXiv:1802.08168 [hep- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [61]

    TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems

    M. Abadiet al., TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learn- ing on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems, (2016), arXiv:1603.04467 [cs.DC]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [62]

    Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

    F. Pedregosaet al., Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Machine Learning Res.12, 2825 (2011), arXiv:1201.0490 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011