pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08559 · v1 · pith:OAOZZYUEnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 🧮 math.AP

Strong comparison principle and symmetry results for the fractional p-Laplacian

Anup Biswas , Subhajit Roy , Aniket Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords fractional p-Laplacianstrong comparison principlesymmetry resultsDirichlet boundary conditionsnonlocal elliptic equationsregularity of solutions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A strong comparison principle for the fractional p-Laplacian yields symmetry of positive solutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a strong comparison principle for the equation (-Δ_p)^s u = f(u) where f is locally Lipschitz, in bounded domains of dimension at least 2. This principle is proved in a fairly general setting and then applied directly to positive C^1 solutions that satisfy Dirichlet boundary conditions, producing symmetry results. The work also verifies that such solutions are indeed C^1 when p lies in the interval from 2 up to 2/(1-s). A sympathetic reader would care because the comparison principle supplies a tool that converts local touching information into global ordering of solutions, which in turn forces symmetry without additional assumptions on the domain shape beyond boundedness.

Core claim

We establish a strong comparison principle in a fairly general setting and use it to derive symmetry results for positive C^1 solutions satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions. We also show that the C^1 regularity assumption is indeed satisfied for p in [2, 2/(1-s)).

What carries the argument

The strong comparison principle for the fractional p-Laplacian operator, which upgrades pointwise touching of subsolutions and supersolutions into strict inequality in the interior.

If this is right

  • Positive C^1 solutions with Dirichlet data are symmetric.
  • The C^1 regularity of solutions holds for all p between 2 and 2/(1-s).
  • The comparison principle applies to the equation in any bounded domain.
  • Symmetry conclusions follow once two solutions touch at an interior point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same comparison device could be tested on equations with nonlocal right-hand sides beyond locally Lipschitz f.
  • Symmetry might be used to reduce the problem to an ODE on radial profiles for numerical checks.
  • The principle may allow comparison between solutions on different domains when one is contained in the other.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinearity f is locally Lipschitz continuous.

What would settle it

A positive C^1 solution to the equation in a ball that satisfies the Dirichlet condition yet fails to be radially symmetric would show the symmetry claim is false.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08559 by Aniket Sen, Anup Biswas, Subhajit Roy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualization of the cone as k Ñ 8, where ξk is a point on the line joining xk and yk, and e˜k is the unit vector along xk ´ yk. To derive a contradiction from (5.7) we show that, for r sufficiently small, lim sup kÑ8 1 δk J1,k ă 0. (5.8) Estimate (5.8) actually follows from [13, Theorem 2.3]. We add a proof here for the convenience of reading. Applying mean-value theorem on gptq “ t ´ n`sp 2 we note that … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this article, we study the equation $$ (-\Delta_p)^s u = f(u) $$ in a bounded domain $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n$, where $n\geq 2$, $p>2$, and $f$ is locally Lipschitz. We establish a strong comparison principle in a fairly general setting and use it to derive symmetry results for positive $C^1$ solutions satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions. We also show that the $C^1$ regularity assumption is indeed satisfied for $p\in \left[2,\frac{2}{1-s}\right)$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the equation (-Δ_p)^s u = f(u) in a bounded domain Ω ⊂ ℝ^n (n ≥ 2, p > 2) with f locally Lipschitz. It establishes a strong comparison principle in a general setting and applies it to obtain symmetry results for positive C^1 solutions satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions. It also proves that the C^1 regularity assumption holds for p ∈ [2, 2/(1-s)).

Significance. If the proofs are correct, the work supplies a useful strong comparison principle and symmetry results for the fractional p-Laplacian, extending classical local results to the nonlocal setting. The self-contained regularity statement for the stated p-range strengthens the applicability of the symmetry theorems to the class of solutions considered.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement lists p > 2 while the regularity result includes the endpoint p = 2; clarify whether the comparison principle and symmetry results are intended to hold at p = 2 or only for p > 2.
  2. [Introduction] The introduction should explicitly recall the precise definition of the fractional p-Laplacian operator used throughout (including the normalization constant and the range of s) to avoid any ambiguity for readers.
  3. [Section 2] Notation for the space of admissible functions (e.g., the precise Sobolev or Hölder space in which the comparison principle is stated) appears only after the main theorem; move a brief definition to the setup section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the manuscript and the recommendation of minor revision. The report does not list any major comments requiring a point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents a direct mathematical proof of a strong comparison principle for the fractional p-Laplacian under the stated local Lipschitz condition on f, followed by symmetry results via moving planes and a self-contained regularity argument establishing C^1 solutions for p in [2, 2/(1-s)). No load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or definitions that presuppose the target result. The derivation chain relies on operator properties and standard analysis techniques that are independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard properties of the fractional p-Laplacian operator and the local Lipschitz condition on f; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The fractional p-Laplacian operator satisfies the standard comparison and maximum principles in the nonlocal setting.
    Invoked as background for the strong comparison principle.
  • domain assumption f is locally Lipschitz continuous.
    Stated in the equation setup; required for the comparison result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5625 in / 1108 out tokens · 18290 ms · 2026-06-27T18:07:30.682700+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Badiale and E

    M. Badiale and E. Naban. A note on radiality of solutions ofp-Laplacian, Applicable Analysis 52.1-4, 35–43, 1994

    1994

  2. [2]

    Barrios and M

    B. Barrios and M. Medina. Equivalence of weak and viscosity solutions in fractional non-homogeneous problems. Math. Ann., 381(3-4): 1979–2012, 2021

    1979

  3. [3]

    Barrios, Montoro, L

    B. Barrios, Montoro, L. and B. Sciunzi. On the moving plane method for nonlocal problems in bounded domains. J. Anal. Math. 135, 37–57, 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    Biswas and M

    A. Biswas and M. Modasiya. Mixed local-nonlocal operators: maximum principles, eigenvalue problems and their applications. J. Anal. Math. 156, 47–81, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Biswas and A

    A. Biswas and A. Sen. Improved Hölder regularity of fractionalpp, qq-Poisson equation with regular data, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Biswas and E

    A. Biswas and E. Topp. Lipschitz regularity of fractionalp-Laplacian,Annals of PDE11, no. 27, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Bögelein, F

    V. Bögelein, F. Duzaar, N. Liao, G. Molica Bisci, and R. Servadei. Regularity for the fractionalp-Laplace equation,J. Func. Anal.289(9), 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    Bögelein, F

    V. Bögelein, F. Duzaar, N. Liao, G. Molica Bisci, and R. Servadei. Gradient regularity ofps, pq-harmonic func- tions,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, to appear, arXiv:2409.02012, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Brasco, E

    L. Brasco, E. Lindgren, and A. Schikorra. Higher Hölder regularity for the fractional p-Laplacian in the su- perquadratic case,Adv. Math.338, 782–846, 2018

    2018

  10. [10]

    F. Brock. Continuous rearrangement and symmetry of solutions of elliptic problems. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 110, 157–204, 2000

    2000

  11. [11]

    Caffarelli and L

    L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre. Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62, 597–638, 2009 STRONG COMPARISON PRINCIPLE AND SYMMETRY 37

    2009

  12. [12]

    Chaker and L

    J. Chaker and L. Silvestre. Coercivity estimates for integro-differential operators. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59, no. 4, Paper No. 106, 20 pp., 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    W. X. Chen, and C. M. Li. Maximum principles for the fractional p-Laplacian and symmetry of solutions, Adv. Math., 335, 735–758, 2018

    2018

  14. [14]

    Colasuonno, F

    F. Colasuonno, F. Ferrari, P. Gervasio, and A. Quarteroni. Some evaluations of the fractional -Laplace operator on radial functions, Mathematics in Engineering 5(1): 1-23, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Cuesta and P

    M. Cuesta and P. Takáč. A Strong Comparison Principle for the Dirichletp-Laplacian Proceedings of the Confer- ence on Reaction diffusion systems (Trieste, 1995), 79–87, Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., 194, Dekker, New York, 1998

    1995

  16. [16]

    Damascelli

    L. Damascelli. Comparison theorems for some quasilinear degenerate elliptic operators and applications to sym- metry and monotonicity results, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré. Analyse non linéaire, 15(4), 493–516, 1998

    1998

  17. [17]

    Damascelli and F

    L. Damascelli and F. Pacella. Monotonicity and symmetry of solutions ofp-Laplace equations,1ăpă2; via the moving plane method, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 26 (4), 689–707, 1998

    1998

  18. [18]

    Damascelli and F

    L. Damascelli and F. Pacella. Monotonicity and symmetry results forp-Laplace equations and applications, Adv. Differential Equations 5 (7-9), 1179–1200, 2000

    2000

  19. [19]

    Damascelli and B

    L. Damascelli and B. Sciunzi. Regularity, monotonicity and symmetry of positive solutions ofm-Laplace equa- tions, J. Differential Equations 206, 483–515, 2004

    2004

  20. [20]

    Damascelli and B

    L. Damascelli and B. Sciunzi. Harnack inequalities, maximum and comparison principles, and regularity of positive solutions ofm-Laplace equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 25, no. 2, 139–159, 2006

    2006

  21. [21]

    Di Castro, T

    A. Di Castro, T. Kuusi, and G. Palatucci. Nonlocal Harnack inequalities,J. Funct. Anal.267 (6), 1807–1836, 2014

    2014

  22. [22]

    Di Castro, T

    A. Di Castro, T. Kuusi, and G. Palatucci. Local behavior of fractionalp-minimizers,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire33 , 1279–1299, 2016

    2016

  23. [23]

    Dyda and M

    B. Dyda and M. Kassmann. Regularity estimates for elliptic nonlocal operators, Anal. PDE 13(2), 317–370, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Felmer and W

    P. Felmer and W. Wang. Radial symmetry of positive solutions to equations involving the fractional Laplacian, Commun. Contemp. Math. 61. 2014, 1350023

    2014

  25. [25]

    Garain and E

    P. Garain and E. Lindgren. Higher Hölder regularity for the fractionalp-Laplace equation in the subquadratic case.Math. Annalen390, 5753–5792, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Gidas, W

    B. Gidas, W. M. Ni, and L. Nirenberg. Symmetry and related properties via the maximum principle, Comm. Math. Phys. 68, 209–243, 1979

    1979

  27. [27]

    E. Giusti. Direct Methods in the Calculus of Variations. World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, 2003

    2003

  28. [28]

    Giovagnoli, D

    D. Giovagnoli, D. Jesus, and L. Silvestre.C1`α regularity for fractionalp-harmonic functions. ArXiv, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Grossi, S

    M. Grossi, S. Kesavan, F. Pacella, and M. Ramaswamy. Symmetry of positive solutions of some nonlinear equations, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 12 (1), 47–59, 1998

    1998

  30. [30]

    Guedda and L

    M. Guedda and L. Véron. Quasilinear elliptic equations involving critical Sobolev exponents, Nonlinear Anal., 13, no. 8, 879–902, 1989

    1989

  31. [31]

    Hurri-Syrjänen and Antti V

    R. Hurri-Syrjänen and Antti V. Vähäkangas. On fractional Poincaré inequalities, J. Anal. Math., 120, 85–104, 2013

    2013

  32. [32]

    Iannizzotto, S

    A. Iannizzotto, S. Mosconi, and N. S. Papageorgiou. On the logistic equation for the fractional p-Laplacian. Math. Nachr. 296, 1451–1468, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Iannizzotto, S

    A. Iannizzotto, S. Mosconi, and M. Squassina. Global Hölder regularity for the fractional p-Laplacian, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 32,1353–1392, 2016

    2016

  34. [34]

    A.Iannizzotto, S.Mosconi, andM.Squassina.Fineboundaryregularityforthedegeneratefractionalp-Laplacian, J. Funct. Anal.279, no. 8, 108659, 54 pp., 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Iwaniec and J

    T. Iwaniec and J. Manfredi. Regularity ofp-harmonic functions on the plane, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 5, 1–19, 1989

    1989

  36. [36]

    S. Jarohs. Strong comparison principle for the fractional p-Laplacian and applications to starshaped rings, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 18(4), 691–704, 2018

    2018

  37. [37]

    S.KichenassamyandJ.Smoller.Ontheexistenceofradialsolutionsofquasi-linearellipticequations, Nonlinearity 3, 677–694, 1990

    1990

  38. [38]

    Korvenpää, T

    J. Korvenpää, T. Kuusi and E Lindgren. Equivalence of solutions to fractionalp-Laplace type equations,J. Math. Pures Appl.132, 1–26, 2019

    2019

  39. [39]

    Korvenpää, T

    J. Korvenpää, T. Kuusi, and G. Palatucci. Hölder continuity up to the boundary for a class of fractional obstacle problems,Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl.27, no. 3, 355–367, 2016

    2016

  40. [40]

    Kuusi, G

    T. Kuusi, G. Mingione, and Y. Sire. Nonlocal equations with measure data, Comm. Math. Phys. 337, 1317–1368, 2015

    2015

  41. [41]

    Kuusi, G

    T. Kuusi, G. Mingione, and Y. Sire. Nonlocal self-improving properties, Anal. PDE 8(1), 57–114, 2015

    2015

  42. [42]

    G. Leoni. A First Course in Sobolev Spaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 2009 38 ANUP BISW AS, SUBHAJIT ROY, AND ANIKET SEN

    2009

  43. [43]

    Lucia and S

    M. Lucia and S. Prashant. Strong comparison principle for solutions of quasilinear equations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 132, no. 4, 1005–1011, 2004

    2004

  44. [44]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci, and E. Valdinoci. Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math. 136, no. 5, 521–573, 2012

    2012

  45. [45]

    R. T. Rockafellar. Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1970

    1970

  46. [46]

    Roselli and B

    P. Roselli and B. Sciunzi. A strong comparison principle for thep-Laplacian, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135(10), 3217–3224, 2007

    2007

  47. [47]

    Serrin, A symmetry problem in potential theory, Arch

    J. Serrin, A symmetry problem in potential theory, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 43, 304–318, 1971 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research-Pune, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune 411008, INDIA. Email address:anup@iiserpune.ac.in, subhajit.roy@iiserpune.ac.in, aniket.sen@students.iiserpune.ac.in

    1971