pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08767 · v1 · pith:RTTZQQTOnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Fire at the Tip of the Throat: Hagedorn Phase after brane-antibrane inflation?

Dibya Chakraborty , Ahmed Rakin Kamal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords Hagedorn phasebrane-antibrane inflationdark radiationopen stringsthroat geometrymoduli stabilizationtachyon condensationΔN_eff
0
0 comments X

The pith

If SM branes share the annihilation throat, released energy can drive the visible sector into an open-string Hagedorn phase that suppresses ΔN_eff.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines post-inflationary dynamics in brane-antibrane models with perturbatively stabilized moduli, where inflation ends via tachyon condensation rather than immediate radiation. It asks whether annihilation energy can push the visible sector into an open-string Hagedorn phase. When Standard Model branes sit in the same throat, even a modest fraction of energy deposited into surviving visible open strings suffices to reach this regime and lower the effective number of relativistic species. Outcomes for different throats depend on the timing and efficiency of inter-throat energy transfer, with the effect strongest when the SM throat string scale is lower than or comparable to the annihilation throat.

Core claim

In perturbatively moduli stabilized brane-antibrane inflation, the energy released at annihilation can drive the visible sector into an open-string Hagedorn phase if a modest fraction is deposited into surviving visible open strings, thereby suppressing ΔN_eff below current bounds, especially when SM branes are in the same throat or when inter-throat transfer permits it under suitable string scales.

What carries the argument

Energy deposition into surviving visible open strings after tachyon condensation and brane-antibrane annihilation, which allows the visible sector to enter the Hagedorn regime and alters the count of relativistic species.

If this is right

  • Modest fraction of annihilation energy into visible open strings enters the Hagedorn regime when SM branes are co-located.
  • This suppresses ΔN_eff below observational bounds.
  • Prompt or delayed inter-throat transfer can still produce a visible Hagedorn phase.
  • The mechanism works best when the local string scale in the SM throat is lower than or comparable to the annihilation throat.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend to other string inflation models that terminate via brane annihilation.
  • It provides a geometric handle on dark radiation that ties directly to throat placement and string scales.
  • Precise modeling of open-string survival after annihilation could yield sharper early-universe predictions.
  • If the fraction deposited proves too small in explicit constructions, the suppression mechanism would not operate.

Load-bearing premise

A non-negligible fraction of the annihilation energy is deposited into surviving visible open strings rather than immediately thermalizing into radiation or transferring away.

What would settle it

A calculation showing the deposited energy fraction into visible open strings falls below the threshold needed to reach Hagedorn temperature, or a cosmological measurement of ΔN_eff that stays above the suppressed value even under same-throat conditions.

read the original abstract

We study the post-inflationary open-string Hagedorn phase in perturbatively moduli stabilized brane-antibrane inflation. In this class of models, the volume modulus is stabilized by perturbative corrections rather than by non-perturbative effects to the superpotential, thereby avoiding the standard brane-antibrane $\eta$-problem. Since inflation ends through tachyon condensation and brane-antibrane annihilation, the endpoint is intrinsically stringy and need not be described immediately by an ordinary radiation bath. We analyze whether the energy released at annihilation can drive the visible sector into an open-string Hagedorn phase, and study the consequences for dark radiation. If the Standard Model (SM) branes lie in the same throat as where the annihilation occurs, we find that a modest fraction of the released energy deposited into surviving visible open strings is sufficient to enter the Hagedorn regime and can suppress the effective number of relativistic species $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ below current observational bounds. If the SM lies in a different throat, the result depends on inter-throat energy transfer: prompt or delayed transfer can still yield a visible Hagedorn phase. However, the mechanism is most efficient when the local string scale in the SM throat is lower than or comparable to that in the annihilation throat.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines the post-inflationary dynamics in perturbatively moduli-stabilized brane-antibrane inflation models. It argues that tachyon condensation at the end of inflation can deposit a modest fraction of the released energy into surviving visible-sector open strings when the SM branes share the throat with the annihilation site, driving the system into an open-string Hagedorn phase that suppresses ΔN_eff below observational bounds. For inter-throat scenarios the outcome depends on the efficiency and timing of energy transfer, with the mechanism most effective when the SM throat has a lower or comparable local string scale.

Significance. If the central energy-partitioning claim holds, the work supplies a concrete string-theoretic route to mitigating the dark-radiation problem that commonly plagues brane-antibrane constructions, thereby strengthening the phenomenological viability of this class of inflationary models without invoking additional non-perturbative effects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (paragraph on energy deposition) and the corresponding discussion of inter-throat transfer] The load-bearing step is the assertion that a non-negligible fraction of the annihilation energy is deposited into surviving visible open strings rather than promptly thermalizing or transferring elsewhere. The manuscript states this possibility when the SM branes lie in the same throat but supplies no explicit computation of the tachyon-condensation spectrum, open-string excitation branching ratios, or the resulting energy fraction; without such a calculation the threshold condition for entering the Hagedorn regime remains unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (final sentence)] Notation for the local string scale in the SM throat versus the annihilation throat should be introduced with an explicit equation or definition at first use to avoid ambiguity when comparing the two cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the key assumption regarding energy deposition. We respond to the major comment as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (paragraph on energy deposition) and the corresponding discussion of inter-throat transfer] The load-bearing step is the assertion that a non-negligible fraction of the annihilation energy is deposited into surviving visible open strings rather than promptly thermalizing or transferring elsewhere. The manuscript states this possibility when the SM branes lie in the same throat but supplies no explicit computation of the tachyon-condensation spectrum, open-string excitation branching ratios, or the resulting energy fraction; without such a calculation the threshold condition for entering the Hagedorn regime remains unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript does not assert that a non-negligible fraction is necessarily deposited into visible open strings; instead, it shows that a modest fraction, if deposited, is sufficient to drive the system into the Hagedorn phase and thereby suppress ΔN_eff. We motivate the plausibility of such a deposition by appealing to the string-theoretic nature of tachyon condensation in brane-antibrane annihilation, where open-string modes on the visible branes are expected to be excited. While we acknowledge that an explicit computation of the spectrum and branching ratios would strengthen the argument, this lies beyond the scope of the present work, which is focused on the cosmological implications. We will revise the abstract and the relevant discussion sections to emphasize the conditional nature of the result and to include a brief discussion of the relevant literature on tachyon condensation. For the inter-throat transfer case, our analysis similarly relies on the efficiency of energy transfer mechanisms, which we discuss qualitatively; a detailed microphysical model of inter-throat dynamics is left for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that a modest fraction of annihilation energy into surviving visible open strings can drive a Hagedorn phase suppressing ΔN_eff—rests on explicit model assumptions about energy deposition and inter-throat transfer, presented as inputs to the analysis rather than quantities derived from or equivalent to the result itself. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described structure. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks with no enumerated circular patterns exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the general reliance on string theory compactifications and energy transfer assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5769 in / 1145 out tokens · 17447 ms · 2026-06-27T17:48:57.150542+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Circle That Won't Return: The Fate of RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In type 0A on a two-circle wedge, isolated collapsing-branch D_p^- sources incur infinite RR field energy cost as the branch shrinks, with possible infrared screening or discharge to D_p^+ via an effective relative-ch...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 135 (2025), arXiv:2505.13646 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Cicoli, Gen

    M. Cicoli, Gen. Rel. Grav.58, 33 (2026), arXiv:2604.16281 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    C. P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh, and R. J. Zhang, JHEP07, 047, arXiv:hep- th/0105204

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Sen, JHEP08, 012, arXiv:hep-th/9805170

    A. Sen, JHEP08, 012, arXiv:hep-th/9805170

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Sen, inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the The- ories of Fields, Strings and Branes(1999) pp

    A. Sen, inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the The- ories of Fields, Strings and Branes(1999) pp. 187–234, arXiv:hep-th/9904207

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Sen, JHEP12, 027, arXiv:hep-th/9911116

    A. Sen, JHEP12, 027, arXiv:hep-th/9911116

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Cicoli, C

    M. Cicoli, C. Hughes, A. R. Kamal, F. Marino, F. Quevedo, M. Ramos-Hamud, and G. Villa, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 315 (2025), arXiv:2410.00097 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister, and S. P. Trivedi, JCAP10, 013, arXiv:hep- th/0308055

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D68, 046005 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0301240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, JHEP03, 007, arXiv:hep-th/0502058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Dymarsky, I. R. Klebanov, J. M. Malda- cena, L. P. McAllister, and A. Murugan, JHEP11, 031, arXiv:hep-th/0607050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Antoniadis, Y

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 766 (2018), arXiv:1803.08941 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Hai, Perturbative Kähler Moduli Inflation (2025), arXiv:2506.08083 [hep-th]

    M. Hai, Perturbative Kähler Moduli Inflation (2025), arXiv:2506.08083 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Chakraborty, M

    D. Chakraborty, M. Hai, S. T. Jahan, A. R. Ka- mal, and M. S. J. Shuvo, Fibre Inflation Meets Quintessence: Implications of Perturbative Stabilisation (2025), arXiv:2511.19610 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G. K. Leontaris, and P. Shukla, Phys. Rev. D110, 106009 (2024), arXiv:2406.01694 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G. K. Leontaris, and P. Shukla, JCAP09, 004, arXiv:2405.06738 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Chakraborty and R

    D. Chakraborty and R. O. Ramos, JHEP09, 020, arXiv:2505.04447 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Basiouris and G

    V. Basiouris and G. K. Leontaris, Fortsch. Phys.70, 2100181 (2022), arXiv:2109.08421 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Basiouris and D

    V. Basiouris and D. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. D111, 126008 (2025), arXiv:2502.06958 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    G. K. Leontaris and P. Shukla, PoSCORFU2024, 181 (2025), arXiv:2505.01246 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    G. K. Leontaris and P. Shukla, On Global Embedding of Assisted Fibre Inflation (2026), arXiv:2604.19250 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack, and J. Louis, JHEP06, 060, arXiv:hep-th/0204254

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Antoniadis, Y

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, PoS CORFU2018, 099 (2019), arXiv:1901.05075 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    J. P. Conlon and E. Palti, JHEP09, 019, arXiv:0906.1920 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1920

  25. [25]

    J. P. Conlon and F. G. Pedro, JHEP06, 082, arXiv:1003.0388 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and B. Kors, JHEP11, 030, arXiv:hep- th/0508043

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and E. Pajer, JHEP09, 031, arXiv:0704.0737 [hep-th]. 10

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, JHEP01, 052, arXiv:0708.1873 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Ciupke, J

    D. Ciupke, J. Louis, and A. Westphal, JHEP10, 094, arXiv:1505.03092 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo, and I. Zavala, Phys. Rept.1059, 1 (2024), arXiv:2303.04819 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    J. J. Atick and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B310, 291 (1988)

    1988

  32. [32]

    R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B316, 391 (1989)

    1989

  33. [33]

    A. A. Tseytlin and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B372, 443 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9109048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  34. [34]

    Nayeri, R

    A. Nayeri, R. H. Brandenberger, and C. Vafa, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 021302 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0511140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  35. [35]

    A. R. Frey, R. Mahanta, and A. Maharana, Phys. Rev. D 105, 066007 (2022), arXiv:2108.03317 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    A. R. Frey, R. Mahanta, A. Maharana, F. Quevedo, and G. Villa, JHEP12, 174, arXiv:2408.13803 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    A. R. Frey, R. Mahanta, A. Maharana, F. Muia, F. Quevedo, and G. Villa, JHEP03, 112, arXiv:2310.11494 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Brunelli, M

    L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, and F. G. Pedro, JCAP07, 010, arXiv:2503.11293 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Brunelli, M

    L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, and F. Gil Pedro, JCAP05, 042, arXiv:2510.06359 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    L.Brunelli, F.Revello,andG.Villa,Thegravitationalwave landscape of cosmic string networks with varying tension (2026), arXiv:2601.10790 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy, and N. S. González, Phys. Rev. D110, 083537 (2024), arXiv:2406.12637 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy, and N. Sánchez González, High-frequency Gravitational Waves from Superstring Phases in the Early Universe (2025), arXiv:2511.16404 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Sánchez González, J

    N. Sánchez González, J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, and E. Hardy, JHEP10, 121, arXiv:2505.14187 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Villa, PoSCOSMICWISPers2025, 007 (2026)

    G. Villa, PoSCOSMICWISPers2025, 007 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Ghoshal, F

    A. Ghoshal, F. Revello, and G. Villa, JCAP08, 092, arXiv:2504.20994 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    Revello and G

    F. Revello and G. Villa, JCAP04, 049, arXiv:2411.04186 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    V. K. Oikonomou, A Stiff Pre-CMB Era with a Mildly Blue-tilted Tensor Inflationary Era can Explain the 2023 NANOGravSignal(2023),arXiv:2309.04850[astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rev. D108, 043516 (2023), arXiv:2306.17351 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Datta and R

    S. Datta and R. Samanta, JHEP02, 095, arXiv:2409.03498 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Y. Cui, S. Kuroyanagi, M. Lewicki, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, I. Y. Rybak, L. Sousa, and J. M. Wachter (LISA Cosmology Working Group), JCAP05, 006, arXiv:2405.03740 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    Dimitriou, D

    A. Dimitriou, D. G. Figueroa, P. Simakachorn, and B. Zal- divar, JCAP05, 037, arXiv:2508.05395 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Polchinski, Int

    J. Polchinski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20, 3413 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412244

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Majumdar, inCOSLAB 2004(2005) arXiv:hep- th/0512062

    M. Majumdar, inCOSLAB 2004(2005) arXiv:hep- th/0512062

    arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    C. P. Burgess, P. Martineau, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh, and R. J. Zhang, JHEP03, 052, arXiv:hep-th/0111025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Barnaby, C

    N. Barnaby, C. P. Burgess, and J. M. Cline, JCAP04, 007, arXiv:hep-th/0412040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Sarangi and S

    S. Sarangi and S. H. H. Tye, Phys. Lett. B536, 185 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0204074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  57. [57]

    Majumdar and A.-C

    M. Majumdar and A.-C. Davis, JHEP12, 012, arXiv:hep- th/0304153

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    Majumdar and A.-C

    M. Majumdar and A.-C. Davis, JHEP03, 056, arXiv:hep- th/0202148

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    Sen, JHEP09, 023, arXiv:hep-th/9808141

    A. Sen, JHEP09, 023, arXiv:hep-th/9808141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0105097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  61. [61]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B536, 199 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9807080

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  62. [62]

    I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, JHEP08, 052, arXiv:hep-th/0007191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B578, 123 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0002159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  64. [64]

    Valeixo Bento, D

    B. Valeixo Bento, D. Chakraborty, S. Parameswaran, and I. Zavala, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34, 2530003 (2025), arXiv:2301.05178 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    S. A. Abel, J. L. F. Barbon, I. I. Kogan, and E. Rabinovici, JHEP04, 015, arXiv:hep-th/9902058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Lee and L

    S. Lee and L. Thorlacius, Phys. Lett. B413, 303 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9707167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  67. [67]

    Baumann,Cosmology(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    D. Baumann,Cosmology(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Dodelson,Modern Cosmology(Academic Press, Amster- dam, 2003)

    S. Dodelson,Modern Cosmology(Academic Press, Amster- dam, 2003)

    2003

  69. [69]

    Husdal, Galaxies4, 78 (2016), arXiv:1609.04979 [astro- ph.CO]

    L. Husdal, Galaxies4, 78 (2016), arXiv:1609.04979 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    N. Deo, S. Jain, and C.-I. Tan, Phys. Rev. D40, 2626 (1989)

    1989

  71. [71]

    R. H. Brandenberger, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 204005 (2011), arXiv:1105.3247 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    B. Chen, Y. Wang, W. Xue, and R. Brandenberger, The Universe3, 2 (2015), arXiv:0712.2477 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Aldazabal, L

    G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ibanez, F. Quevedo, and A. M. Uranga, JHEP08, 002, arXiv:hep-th/0005067

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Krippendorf, M

    S. Krippendorf, M. J. Dolan, A. Maharana, and F. Quevedo, JHEP06, 092, arXiv:1002.1790 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Cicoli, I

    M. Cicoli, I. Garcia Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla, and R. Valandro, JHEP08, 109, arXiv:2106.11964 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [76]

    Ouyang, Nucl

    P. Ouyang, Nucl. Phys. B699, 207 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0311084

    arXiv 2004

  77. [77]

    Kuperstein, JHEP03, 014, arXiv:hep-th/0411097

    S. Kuperstein, JHEP03, 014, arXiv:hep-th/0411097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    H.-Y. Chen, P. Ouyang, and G. Shiu, JHEP01, 028, arXiv:0807.2428 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Firouzjahi and S

    H. Firouzjahi and S. H. H. Tye, JCAP03, 009, arXiv:hep- th/0501099

    arXiv

  80. [80]

    Davis, P

    A.-C. Davis, P. Brax, and C. van de Bruck, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A465, 781 (2009), arXiv:0803.0424 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.