Maximal Transcendentality of the Double-Scaled PCM

Evgeny Sobko (LIMS; London)

arxiv: 2606.09972 · v2 · pith:4XC2Z257new · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP· math.NT

Maximal Transcendentality of the Double-Scaled PCM

Evgeny Sobko (LIMS , London) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.NT

keywords Principal Chiral Modelmaximal transcendentalitydouble-scaling limitvacuum energyzeta valuesperturbative expansionlarge-N limitstrong coupling

0 comments

The pith

The double-scaled large-N Principal Chiral Model has maximally transcendental vacuum energy to all orders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that the perturbative expansion of the vacuum energy in the double-scaling regime of the strongly coupled large-N Principal Chiral Model is maximally transcendental at every order. This property means each coefficient contains only the highest possible weight combinations of zeta values allowed by the order. After one natural shift of the coupling constant, the coefficients reduce further to rational polynomials built solely from odd zeta values. Explicit computation through 35 orders uncovers additional regularities in the number-theoretic structure beyond the maximal transcendentality itself.

Core claim

In the double-scaling regime of the Principal Chiral Model at large N and strong coupling, the vacuum energy expansion is maximally transcendental to all orders. After a natural shift in the coupling, the coefficients are expressed purely as polynomials in odd zeta values with rational coefficients.

What carries the argument

The double-scaling regime of the Principal Chiral Model, which defines a perturbative expansion of the vacuum energy whose coefficients satisfy the maximal transcendentality property.

If this is right

Every term in the vacuum-energy series has the highest possible transcendentality weight for its perturbative order.
A single coupling-constant shift removes all even zeta values and leaves only rational multiples of odd-zeta polynomials.
The pattern observed through 35 orders continues indefinitely and produces further hidden number-theoretic relations.
The result applies uniformly across the entire perturbative series in the defined regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same shift and transcendentality structure may appear in the vacuum energy of other integrable sigma models under analogous double-scaling limits.
The additional regularities seen at low orders could point to a closed-form generating function for the entire series.
If the pattern persists, finite-N corrections might be organized by the same odd-zeta polynomials with N-dependent rational prefactors.
The result supplies a concrete target for any non-perturbative definition of the model in the double-scaled regime.

Load-bearing premise

The double-scaling regime of the Principal Chiral Model is correctly defined and the perturbative expansion is well-posed.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of any coefficient beyond order 35 that contains a term with non-maximal weight or an even zeta value that cannot be removed by the coupling shift.

read the original abstract

We prove, to all orders, maximal transcendentality of the strongly coupled large-N Principal Chiral Model in the double-scaling regime introduced in our earlier work. We also prove that, after a natural shift of the coupling constant, the coefficients of the vacuum-energy expansion are expressed purely as polynomials in odd zeta values with rational coefficients. The first 35 explicitly computed orders reveal further number-theoretic regularities, pointing to hidden structure beyond maximal transcendentality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives an all-order proof that vacuum energy in the double-scaled large-N PCM is maximally transcendental and reduces to rational polynomials in odd zetas after a coupling shift, backed by 35 explicit orders.

read the letter

The central claim is that the vacuum-energy series in this regime has only terms of maximal transcendentality weight at each order, and a simple shift in the coupling constant makes every coefficient a polynomial in odd zeta values with rational prefactors. The first 35 terms computed by the author show additional regularities that go beyond the main statement.

What is new is the all-order proof itself together with the explicit polynomial structure after the shift; the 35-term data set is also concrete evidence that the pattern holds at least that far. The computations appear to be done systematically and the number-theoretic observations are presented plainly.

The main soft spot is that the double-scaling regime and the perturbative expansion are taken from the author’s earlier paper. The present work does not re-derive or independently verify the well-posedness of that limit, so any hidden assumption about interchange of limits or regularization that fails at high orders would undermine the all-order statements. The abstract and stress-test note flag this dependence clearly.

The paper is aimed at people working on integrable sigma models, large-N expansions, and the appearance of zeta values in perturbative QFT. A reader already familiar with the prior definition of the double-scaled PCM will get the most out of it.

It deserves a serious referee because the claim is sharp, the low-order data is reproducible in principle, and the result would be useful if the proof checks out. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to prove to all orders that the vacuum-energy expansion of the strongly coupled large-N Principal Chiral Model in the double-scaling regime (introduced in the authors' earlier work) exhibits maximal transcendentality. It further proves that, after a natural shift of the coupling constant, the coefficients are polynomials in odd zeta values with rational coefficients. Explicit computation of the first 35 orders is said to reveal additional number-theoretic regularities beyond maximal transcendentality.

Significance. If the double-scaling construction is rigorously well-posed, the all-orders result on maximal transcendentality and the polynomial structure in odd zeta values would constitute a significant advance in understanding the number-theoretic content of the perturbative series for this integrable model. The explicit high-order computations provide concrete data supporting the claims and hint at further hidden structure.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] The all-orders proof and the statement about the coupling shift presuppose that the double-scaling regime and the associated perturbative expansion are correctly defined and well-posed, yet these are invoked solely by reference to 'our earlier work' without re-derivation or independent verification in the present manuscript. Any ambiguity in limit interchange or regularization in the prior construction would render the new claims non-independent.
[Abstract] The manuscript asserts a proof 'to all orders' of both maximal transcendentality and the polynomial form after the coupling shift, but the provided text supplies no explicit derivation steps, intermediate lemmas, or handling of the coupling shift that would allow verification of the argument.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'the first 35 explicitly computed orders' but does not indicate the section or table in which these orders, or the observed regularities, are presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting these points of presentation. The manuscript assumes the double-scaling construction of our prior work and derives the transcendentality statements from it; we address the two major comments below and indicate where clarifications can be added.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The all-orders proof and the statement about the coupling shift presuppose that the double-scaling regime and the associated perturbative expansion are correctly defined and well-posed, yet these are invoked solely by reference to 'our earlier work' without re-derivation or independent verification in the present manuscript. Any ambiguity in limit interchange or regularization in the prior construction would render the new claims non-independent.

Authors: The double-scaling limit and the resulting perturbative expansion are defined and justified in the cited earlier work. The present manuscript takes that construction as given and proves new statements about the number-theoretic content of the series. While the claims are logically independent of the foundational construction, we agree that a short self-contained recap of the double-scaling procedure and the definition of the vacuum-energy expansion would improve readability and reduce dependence on the prior paper. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript asserts a proof 'to all orders' of both maximal transcendentality and the polynomial form after the coupling shift, but the provided text supplies no explicit derivation steps, intermediate lemmas, or handling of the coupling shift that would allow verification of the argument.

Authors: The full text contains an all-orders inductive proof that proceeds order by order, using the integrable structure of the model together with explicit recursions for the coefficients of the vacuum energy. The coupling shift is introduced by a redefinition of the expansion parameter that eliminates all even-zeta contributions at each order; the induction hypothesis then shows that the remaining coefficients are rational polynomials in odd zeta values. We will add a concise outline of this inductive argument and the handling of the shift to the introduction (or a new subsection) so that the logical steps are immediately visible without requiring the reader to reconstruct them from the detailed calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central all-orders claim rests on double-scaling regime and perturbative well-posedness defined only via self-citation to earlier work

specific steps

self citation load bearing [Abstract]
"We prove, to all orders, maximal transcendentality of the strongly coupled large-N Principal Chiral Model in the double-scaling regime introduced in our earlier work."

The all-orders proof presupposes that the double-scaling regime is correctly defined and that the perturbative expansion is well-posed. Both are invoked only by reference to the same author's prior work; no independent derivation or external benchmark is provided in the present manuscript. If the prior construction contains an implicit assumption that fails at higher orders, the claimed statements do not follow.

full rationale

The manuscript's strongest claims (all-orders maximal transcendentality and polynomial structure in odd zeta values) are proofs about the double-scaling regime of the large-N PCM. The abstract and skeptic summary explicitly locate the regime definition and perturbative well-posedness in 'our earlier work' by the same author, with no re-derivation or independent check supplied here. This matches the self_citation_load_bearing pattern: the load-bearing premise is justified solely by an overlapping-author citation whose content is not re-verified. No other patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, etc.) are exhibited in the supplied text. The score is set at 6 rather than 8-10 because the present paper still performs new all-orders proofs once the regime is granted; the circularity is confined to the foundational assumption rather than forcing the entire result by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the prior definition of the double-scaling regime; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The double-scaling regime of the large-N PCM is well-defined and the vacuum-energy expansion exists in that regime as introduced in the authors' earlier work.
The abstract explicitly builds the new proof on the regime defined in 'our earlier work.'

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5596 in / 1421 out tokens · 26328 ms · 2026-06-27T15:28:44.627367+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith

[1]

In the DS limit, the energy receives contributions only from the two modes (b 2 −t 2)± 1 2 [13]

(12) of the kernelK(p) = coth π|p| 2 = (G+(p)G−(p))−1, where |p|is implied as √p+i0 √p−i0. In the DS limit, the energy receives contributions only from the two modes (b 2 −t 2)± 1 2 [13]. Thus, after solving (11), one obtains: E= b2 8π2 (1 + 2 ∞X j=0 β− 1 2 ,1−j b−j−1) (13) II. MAXIMAL TRANSCENDENT ALITY AND THE ODD-ZET A STRUCTURE The Wiener-Hopf factorG...
[2]

A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, DGLAP and BFKL equations in theN= 4 supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B661, 19 (2003), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 685, 405–407 (2004)], arXiv:hep-ph/0208220

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[3]

C. Duhr, Mathematical aspects of scattering ampli- tudes, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elemen- tary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders(2015) pp. 419–476, arXiv:1411.7538 [hep-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[4]

Marboe and D

C. Marboe and D. Volin, Quantum spectral curve as a tool for a perturbative quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B899, 810 (2015), arXiv:1411.4758 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[5]

J. M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regu- larization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 251601 (2013), arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[6]

G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov, New Integrable 4D Quan- tum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 201602 (2016), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 6 259903 (2016)], arXiv:1512.06704 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[7]

Stieberger, Closed superstring amplitudes, single- valued multiple zeta values and the Deligne associator, J

S. Stieberger, Closed superstring amplitudes, single- valued multiple zeta values and the Deligne associator, J. Phys. A47, 155401 (2014), arXiv:1310.3259 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[8]

Brown and C

F. Brown and C. Dupont, Single-valued integration and superstring amplitudes in genus zero, Commun. Math. Phys.382, 815 (2021), arXiv:1910.01107 [math.NT]

arXiv 2021
[9]

Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun

F. Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.11, 453 (2017), arXiv:1512.06409 [math-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

A. M. Polyakov, Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields, Phys. Lett.59B, 79 (1975)

1975
[11]

A. M. Polyakov, Hidden Symmetry of the Two- Dimensional Chiral Fields, Phys. Lett.72B, 224 (1977)

1977
[12]

A. M. Polyakov and P. B. Wiegmann, Goldstone Fields in Two-Dimensions with Multivalued Actions, Phys. Lett. 141B, 223 (1984)

1984
[13]

Wiegmann, EXACT FACTORIZED S MATRIX OF THE CHIRAL FIELD IN TWO-DIMENSIONS, Phys

P. Wiegmann, EXACT FACTORIZED S MATRIX OF THE CHIRAL FIELD IN TWO-DIMENSIONS, Phys. Lett.142B, 173 (1984)

1984
[14]

Kazakov, E

V. Kazakov, E. Sobko, and K. Zarembo, Double-scaling limit in the principal chiral model: A new noncritical string?, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 191602 (2020)

2020
[15]

V. A. Kazakov and A. A. Migdal, Recent Progress in the Theory of Noncritical Strings, Nucl. Phys.B311, 171 (1988)

1988
[16]

Brezin, V

E. Brezin, V. A. Kazakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Scaling Violation in a Field Theory of Closed Strings in One Physical Dimension, Nucl. Phys.B338, 673 (1990)

1990
[17]

D. J. Gross and N. Miljkovic, A Nonperturbative Solution ofD= 1 String Theory, Phys. Lett.B238, 217 (1990)

1990
[18]

P. H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin, 2-d GRAVITY + 1-d MATTER, Phys. Lett.B240, 333 (1990)

1990
[19]

Volin, From the mass gap in O(N) to the non-Borel- summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models, Phys

D. Volin, From the mass gap in O(N) to the non-Borel- summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models, Phys. Rev. D81, 105008 (2010), arXiv:0904.2744 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[20]

Mari˜ no and T

M. Mari˜ no and T. Reis, Renormalons in integrable field theories, JHEP04, 160, arXiv:1909.12134 [hep-th]

arXiv 1909
[21]

Di Pietro, M

L. Di Pietro, M. Mari˜ no, G. Sberveglieri, and M. Serone, Resurgence and 1/N Expansion in Integrable Field The- ories, JHEP10, 166, arXiv:2108.02647 [hep-th]

arXiv
[22]

M. C. Abbott, Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, ´A. Heged´ us, and S. Sadeghian, Resurgence in the O(4) sigma model, JHEP 05, 253, arXiv:2011.12254 [hep-th]

arXiv 2011
[23]

V. A. Fateev, V. A. Kazakov, and P. B. Wiegmann, Principal chiral field at large N, Nucl. Phys.B424, 505 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9403099 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[24]

Kazakov, E

V. Kazakov, E. Sobko, and K. Zarembo, Large-N Prin- cipal Chiral Model in Arbitrary External Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 141602 (2024), arXiv:2312.04801 [hep- th]

arXiv 2024
[25]

Leurent and E

S. Leurent and E. Sobko, Exact Zero Vacuum En- ergy in twisted SU(N) Principal Chiral Field, (2015), arXiv:1511.08491 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[26]

Kazakov and S

V. Kazakov and S. Leurent, Finite size spectrum of SU(N) principal chiral field from discrete Hirota dynam- ics, Nucl. Phys.B902, 354 (2016), arXiv:1007.1770 [hep- th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[27]

S. Lal, S. Majumder, and E. Sobko, Deep Learn- ing based discovery of Integrable Systems, (2025), arXiv:2503.10469 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025
[28]

S. Lal, S. Majumder, and E. Sobko, The R-mAtrIx Net, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech.5, 035003 (2024), arXiv:2304.07247 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[29]

Sobko, Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys

E. Sobko, Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D111, 046022 (2025). Appendix A: Smallbexpansion The kernelK(t) has the following small-texpansion K(t) = ∞X m=1 2(−1)mζ(2m+ 1) π2m+2 t2m (A1) The constantδ(b) is fixed by the boundary condition ϵ(±b) = 0, which gives ϵ(t) + bZ −b (K(t−t ′)− K(b−t ′))ϵ(t ′)dt ′ = 1 2(b2 −t 2) Rescalingt=bxandϵ(t) =b 2...

2025

[1] [1]

In the DS limit, the energy receives contributions only from the two modes (b 2 −t 2)± 1 2 [13]

(12) of the kernelK(p) = coth π|p| 2 = (G+(p)G−(p))−1, where |p|is implied as √p+i0 √p−i0. In the DS limit, the energy receives contributions only from the two modes (b 2 −t 2)± 1 2 [13]. Thus, after solving (11), one obtains: E= b2 8π2 (1 + 2 ∞X j=0 β− 1 2 ,1−j b−j−1) (13) II. MAXIMAL TRANSCENDENT ALITY AND THE ODD-ZET A STRUCTURE The Wiener-Hopf factorG...

[2] [2]

A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, DGLAP and BFKL equations in theN= 4 supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B661, 19 (2003), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 685, 405–407 (2004)], arXiv:hep-ph/0208220

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[3] [3]

C. Duhr, Mathematical aspects of scattering ampli- tudes, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elemen- tary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders(2015) pp. 419–476, arXiv:1411.7538 [hep-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[4] [4]

Marboe and D

C. Marboe and D. Volin, Quantum spectral curve as a tool for a perturbative quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B899, 810 (2015), arXiv:1411.4758 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[5] [5]

J. M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regu- larization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 251601 (2013), arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[6] [6]

G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov, New Integrable 4D Quan- tum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 201602 (2016), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 6 259903 (2016)], arXiv:1512.06704 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[7] [7]

Stieberger, Closed superstring amplitudes, single- valued multiple zeta values and the Deligne associator, J

S. Stieberger, Closed superstring amplitudes, single- valued multiple zeta values and the Deligne associator, J. Phys. A47, 155401 (2014), arXiv:1310.3259 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[8] [8]

Brown and C

F. Brown and C. Dupont, Single-valued integration and superstring amplitudes in genus zero, Commun. Math. Phys.382, 815 (2021), arXiv:1910.01107 [math.NT]

arXiv 2021

[9] [9]

Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun

F. Brown, Feynman amplitudes, coaction principle, and cosmic Galois group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.11, 453 (2017), arXiv:1512.06409 [math-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[10] [10]

A. M. Polyakov, Interaction of Goldstone Particles in Two-Dimensions. Applications to Ferromagnets and Massive Yang-Mills Fields, Phys. Lett.59B, 79 (1975)

1975

[11] [11]

A. M. Polyakov, Hidden Symmetry of the Two- Dimensional Chiral Fields, Phys. Lett.72B, 224 (1977)

1977

[12] [12]

A. M. Polyakov and P. B. Wiegmann, Goldstone Fields in Two-Dimensions with Multivalued Actions, Phys. Lett. 141B, 223 (1984)

1984

[13] [13]

Wiegmann, EXACT FACTORIZED S MATRIX OF THE CHIRAL FIELD IN TWO-DIMENSIONS, Phys

P. Wiegmann, EXACT FACTORIZED S MATRIX OF THE CHIRAL FIELD IN TWO-DIMENSIONS, Phys. Lett.142B, 173 (1984)

1984

[14] [14]

Kazakov, E

V. Kazakov, E. Sobko, and K. Zarembo, Double-scaling limit in the principal chiral model: A new noncritical string?, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 191602 (2020)

2020

[15] [15]

V. A. Kazakov and A. A. Migdal, Recent Progress in the Theory of Noncritical Strings, Nucl. Phys.B311, 171 (1988)

1988

[16] [16]

Brezin, V

E. Brezin, V. A. Kazakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Scaling Violation in a Field Theory of Closed Strings in One Physical Dimension, Nucl. Phys.B338, 673 (1990)

1990

[17] [17]

D. J. Gross and N. Miljkovic, A Nonperturbative Solution ofD= 1 String Theory, Phys. Lett.B238, 217 (1990)

1990

[18] [18]

P. H. Ginsparg and J. Zinn-Justin, 2-d GRAVITY + 1-d MATTER, Phys. Lett.B240, 333 (1990)

1990

[19] [19]

Volin, From the mass gap in O(N) to the non-Borel- summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models, Phys

D. Volin, From the mass gap in O(N) to the non-Borel- summability in O(3) and O(4) sigma-models, Phys. Rev. D81, 105008 (2010), arXiv:0904.2744 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[20] [20]

Mari˜ no and T

M. Mari˜ no and T. Reis, Renormalons in integrable field theories, JHEP04, 160, arXiv:1909.12134 [hep-th]

arXiv 1909

[21] [21]

Di Pietro, M

L. Di Pietro, M. Mari˜ no, G. Sberveglieri, and M. Serone, Resurgence and 1/N Expansion in Integrable Field The- ories, JHEP10, 166, arXiv:2108.02647 [hep-th]

arXiv

[22] [22]

M. C. Abbott, Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, ´A. Heged´ us, and S. Sadeghian, Resurgence in the O(4) sigma model, JHEP 05, 253, arXiv:2011.12254 [hep-th]

arXiv 2011

[23] [23]

V. A. Fateev, V. A. Kazakov, and P. B. Wiegmann, Principal chiral field at large N, Nucl. Phys.B424, 505 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9403099 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[24] [24]

Kazakov, E

V. Kazakov, E. Sobko, and K. Zarembo, Large-N Prin- cipal Chiral Model in Arbitrary External Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 141602 (2024), arXiv:2312.04801 [hep- th]

arXiv 2024

[25] [25]

Leurent and E

S. Leurent and E. Sobko, Exact Zero Vacuum En- ergy in twisted SU(N) Principal Chiral Field, (2015), arXiv:1511.08491 [hep-th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[26] [26]

Kazakov and S

V. Kazakov and S. Leurent, Finite size spectrum of SU(N) principal chiral field from discrete Hirota dynam- ics, Nucl. Phys.B902, 354 (2016), arXiv:1007.1770 [hep- th]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[27] [27]

S. Lal, S. Majumder, and E. Sobko, Deep Learn- ing based discovery of Integrable Systems, (2025), arXiv:2503.10469 [hep-th]

arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

S. Lal, S. Majumder, and E. Sobko, The R-mAtrIx Net, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech.5, 035003 (2024), arXiv:2304.07247 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

Sobko, Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys

E. Sobko, Continuous quiver gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D111, 046022 (2025). Appendix A: Smallbexpansion The kernelK(t) has the following small-texpansion K(t) = ∞X m=1 2(−1)mζ(2m+ 1) π2m+2 t2m (A1) The constantδ(b) is fixed by the boundary condition ϵ(±b) = 0, which gives ϵ(t) + bZ −b (K(t−t ′)− K(b−t ′))ϵ(t ′)dt ′ = 1 2(b2 −t 2) Rescalingt=bxandϵ(t) =b 2...

2025