pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10136 · v2 · pith:4YMIFSC7new · submitted 2026-06-08 · 💻 cs.CV

iSAGE: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Remote Sensing Semantic Segmentation via Sparse Point Supervision

Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho , Osmar Abilio de Carvalho Junior , Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque , Daniel Guerreiro e Silva This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords semantic segmentationhuman-in-the-loopsparse supervisionremote sensingpoint annotationerror-weighted lossaerial imageryVaihingen
0
0 comments X

The pith

Expert clicks targeting a model's confident errors suffice to match dense pixel supervision in remote sensing semantic segmentation with no auxiliary expansion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether human experts can train semantic segmentation models to dense-label performance by clicking only on pixels the model currently gets wrong, using a loss that weights those errors more heavily. This sidesteps the problem that models' own confidence scores cannot tell correct from incorrect predictions. If the approach works, it would let researchers build accurate models for new sensors or regions with far less labeling effort than traditional dense annotation. Experiments on aerial datasets show the method recovers nearly all of the performance of full supervision while labeling less than 0.05 percent of the pixels.

Core claim

iSAGE demonstrates that iterative expert clicks on confident model errors, trained with an error-weighted loss and without any pseudo-labeling or propagation, achieve mIoU scores matching or exceeding dense supervision on remote sensing benchmarks, reaching 76.78% on ISPRS Vaihingen with only 0.011% of pixels labeled compared to 76.65% for the dense baseline.

What carries the argument

The error-weighted loss that amplifies gradients at expert-clicked error pixels, allowing training from sparse point supervision alone.

If this is right

  • Matches dense baseline on ISPRS Vaihingen with 0.011% labeled pixels.
  • Recovers 97.2% of dense performance on BsB Aerial with 0.040% pixels.
  • Outperforms mechanisms like pseudo-labels and CRF propagation by 7 to 14 percentage points.
  • Shows different annotation needs for amorphous versus small object classes across iterations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The auditable annotation record could support dataset versioning and correction over time.
  • Similar sparse supervision might apply to other pixel-level tasks like depth estimation or change detection.
  • Reducing reliance on dense labels could accelerate model adaptation across different remote sensing platforms and geographies.

Load-bearing premise

That experts can reliably spot and click the pixels where the model is wrong rather than right, even when the model outputs high confidence.

What would settle it

Running the identical training loop but with clicks chosen by random selection or model entropy instead of expert error targeting, and observing whether mIoU still reaches the dense baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10136 by Anesmar Olino de Albuquerque, Daniel Guerreiro e Silva, Osmar Abilio de Carvalho Junior, Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: iSAGE workflow: iterative annotation, training with EWDL, and user-decided stopping. 3.1. Sparse Annotations Sparse annotation labels only a subset of pixels in each frame. The rest are treated as ignore during training. In iSAGE, each annotation corresponds to exactly one pixel. The user clicks on a location in the image, and the software records the coordinate (x, y) along with the selected class label. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Annotation interface with the prediction overlay on training images. The platform comprises four subsystems: 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of the four target classes: (A) buildings, (B) cars, (C) permeable areas, (D) roads. 2024), yielding 155 non-overlapping 512 × 512 test patches. Training uses 1,000 non￾overlapping 512×512 patches from the remaining 16 tiles, a 44% reduction relative to the 1,784 patches used by EasySeg: this smaller training set is a deliberate constraint, not an advantage, kept consistent with iSAGE’s minimum-ef… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual progression of segmentation results across iSAGE iterations. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of final-iteration segmentation results: dense supervision, iSAGE, and random selection. 5.2. ISPRS Vaihingen 5.2.1. External benchmarking iSAGE reached 76.78% mIoU on the ISPRS Vaihingen five-class benchmark at itera￾tion 5 with 29,052 labeled pixels (0.011% of training pixels), matching the dense base￾line trained under iSAGE’s protocol (76.65%) within 0.13 points ( [PITH_FULL_IMA… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Per-iteration mIoU on ISPRS Vaihingen for iSAGE and the four output-reading baselines (oracle entropy, pseudo-labeling, DenseCRF label propagation, uniform random) under identical protocol conditions. The fully-supervised dense baseline trained under iSAGE’s protocol is shown for reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Per-class IoU convergence across iSAGE iterations on the BsB Aerial binary tasks ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Semantic segmentation in remote sensing requires costly pixel-level annotations, and nearly every problem demands a new dataset since models rarely transfer across sensors, platforms, or geographies. Existing human-in-the-loop frameworks expand sparse clicks into dense supervision via auxiliary machinery (pseudo-labels, propagation, CRFs, foundation-model prompts, auxiliary heads), all operating on the model's predictive distribution. A confidently wrong pixel is indistinguishable from a confidently correct one in that distribution by construction, so no rule reading it can separate the two; the distinguishing signal is external to the model. This paper hypothesizes that expert clicks targeting confident model errors, not arbitrary pixels, suffice to match dense supervision, with no expansion machinery. iSAGE (Iterative Sparse Annotation Guided by Expert) realizes this hypothesis on an integrated open-source platform, where an error-weighted loss amplifies the gradient at each click and the annotation record itself is the dataset, extensible, correctable, and auditable. Experiments use a minimum-effort regime: at most one labeled pixel per class per frame. On BsB Aerial, iSAGE recovers 97.2% of dense supervision (74.79% mIoU on 0.040% of pixels) with contrasting class dynamics: amorphous classes (permeable areas) saturate from the seed, while small classes (cars) require late-iteration effort. On ISPRS Vaihingen (external benchmark), iSAGE reaches 76.78% mIoU with 0.011% of pixels, matching the dense baseline (76.65%) and exceeding all published methods. Under the same pipeline, four output-reading mechanisms (oracle entropy across budgets 1--100x, pseudo-labels across thresholds 0.90--0.99, CRF-based propagation, uniform random) plateau 7.4 to 14.5 pp below iSAGE. Across 31 surveyed methods, iSAGE is the only iterative human-in-the-loop framework operating without auxiliary machinery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces iSAGE, a human-in-the-loop framework for remote sensing semantic segmentation that relies on iterative sparse expert point annotations targeting confident model errors (at most one pixel per class per frame), combined with an error-weighted loss, to match dense-supervision performance without pseudo-labeling, propagation, CRFs, or other auxiliary machinery. On ISPRS Vaihingen it reports 76.78% mIoU at 0.011% labeled pixels (vs. 76.65% dense baseline) and on BsB Aerial 74.79% mIoU at 0.040% pixels (97.2% of dense); it also shows 7.4–14.5 pp gains over entropy, pseudo-label, CRF, and random baselines across budgets.

Significance. If the human-identification premise holds, the result is significant: it supplies direct empirical evidence that external expert signal on model errors can replace expansion machinery, with an open-source extensible platform whose annotation record is the dataset. The controlled comparisons to four alternative output-reading mechanisms and the class-specific dynamics (amorphous vs. small objects) strengthen the contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental protocol] Experimental protocol (implicit in §4 and results): the paper does not specify whether the 'expert clicks targeting confident model errors' are obtained by human annotators viewing only the image and predictive map or by oracle access to ground truth to locate errors. This is load-bearing for the central claim that expert identification from the predictive distribution suffices; oracle selection would make the large gap over entropy/pseudo-label/CRF baselines unsurprising and would undermine the human-in-the-loop premise. No inter-annotator agreement, human-study protocol, or visual-only annotation interface description is provided.
  2. [Vaihingen results] Vaihingen results paragraph and comparison table: the claim that iSAGE matches the dense baseline at 0.011% pixels requires explicit confirmation that click selection and model updates are performed iteratively without any GT leakage at selection time; otherwise the 'minimum-effort regime' numbers cannot be interpreted as evidence for the no-expansion hypothesis.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the four output-reading mechanisms are named only later; a parenthetical list (entropy, pseudo-label thresholds, CRF, random) would improve immediate readability.
  2. [Method] Notation: the error-weighted loss is described qualitatively; an explicit equation showing how the per-click weight is computed from the annotation record would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments on experimental protocol are well-taken and we will revise the manuscript to address them explicitly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental protocol] Experimental protocol (implicit in §4 and results): the paper does not specify whether the 'expert clicks targeting confident model errors' are obtained by human annotators viewing only the image and predictive map or by oracle access to ground truth to locate errors. This is load-bearing for the central claim that expert identification from the predictive distribution suffices; oracle selection would make the large gap over entropy/pseudo-label/CRF baselines unsurprising and would undermine the human-in-the-loop premise. No inter-annotator agreement, human-study protocol, or visual-only annotation interface description is provided.

    Authors: We agree the protocol must be stated clearly. The reported experiments simulate expert clicks via oracle access to ground truth solely to identify confident model errors; this isolates the contribution of error-targeted sparse points without auxiliary expansion. The framework itself is designed for human annotators who would view only the image and current prediction map. We will revise §4 and the experimental setup to describe the simulation, note that it provides an upper-bound reference for human performance, and add a limitations paragraph discussing the absence of a full human-subject study together with plans for future interface-based validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Vaihingen results] Vaihingen results paragraph and comparison table: the claim that iSAGE matches the dense baseline at 0.011% pixels requires explicit confirmation that click selection and model updates are performed iteratively without any GT leakage at selection time; otherwise the 'minimum-effort regime' numbers cannot be interpreted as evidence for the no-expansion hypothesis.

    Authors: We will add an explicit statement in the Vaihingen results section confirming the iterative protocol: after each model update on the accumulated sparse points, the next click is chosen from the current prediction map (via the oracle simulation of error identification). No ground-truth information enters the loss or model parameters except through the selected points themselves. This preserves the no-expansion hypothesis while making the simulation transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical validation against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper advances an empirical hypothesis tested via direct mIoU comparisons on ISPRS Vaihingen and BsB Aerial against dense supervision and multiple alternative mechanisms (entropy, pseudo-labels, CRF, random). No mathematical derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed result to its inputs by construction. The error-weighted loss is applied to externally supplied clicks; performance is measured, not derived. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes are load-bearing. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework assumes that human experts provide an external signal to correct model errors that cannot be derived from the model's predictive distribution alone.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Expert humans can reliably identify confident model errors from the predictive distribution.
    The hypothesis relies on experts providing the distinguishing signal external to the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5921 in / 1208 out tokens · 26011 ms · 2026-06-27T16:47:11.655340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Computer Vision – ECCV 2014

    Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , author=. Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8693 , doi=

    2014

  2. [2]

    IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=

    The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding , author=. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages=. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 2016

  3. [3]

    ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Deng, Jia and Dong, Wei and Socher, Richard and Li, Li-Jia and Kai Li and Li Fei-Fei , booktitle=. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , year=. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 2009

  4. [4]

    The VLDB Journal , pages=

    Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: A data-centric AI perspective , author=. The VLDB Journal , pages=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10158 , eprint=

    Data-centric artificial intelligence: A survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10158 , eprint=

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era , year=

    Sun, Chen and Shrivastava, Abhinav and Singh, Saurabh and Gupta, Abhinav , booktitle=. Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era , year=. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2017.97 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.97 2017

  7. [7]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , keywords =

    Rottensteiner, Franz and Sohn, Gunho and Gerke, Markus and Wegner, Jan Dirk and Breitkopf, Uwe and Jung, Jaewook , doi =. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , keywords =

  8. [8]

    2022 , eprint=

    LoveDA: A Remote Sensing Land-Cover Dataset for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  9. [9]

    Remote Sensing , volume=

    Panoptic Segmentation Meets Remote Sensing , author=. Remote Sensing , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  10. [10]

    Scientific Data , month =

    Rahnemoonfar, Maryam and Chowdhury, Tashnim and Murphy, Robin , doi =. Scientific Data , month =

  11. [11]

    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , keywords =

    Bearman, Amy and Russakovsky, Olga and Ferrari, Vittorio and Fei-Fei, Li , doi =. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , keywords =. 2016 , url=. arXiv , arxivId =:1506.02106 , isbn =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , volume=

    Semantic segmentation of remote sensing images with sparse annotations , author=. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , volume=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  13. [13]

    International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

    Active learning for convolutional neural networks: A core-set approach , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=. 1708.00489 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Workshop on challenges in representation learning, ICML , volume=

    Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks , author=. Workshop on challenges in representation learning, ICML , volume=. 2013 , organization=

    2013

  15. [15]

    and Lo, Wan-Yen and Dollár, Piotr and Girshick, Ross , booktitle=

    Kirillov, Alexander and Mintun, Eric and Ravi, Nikhila and Mao, Hanzi and Rolland, Chloe and Gustafson, Laura and Xiao, Tete and Whitehead, Spencer and Berg, Alexander C. and Lo, Wan-Yen and Dollár, Piotr and Girshick, Ross , booktitle=. Segment Anything , year=

  16. [16]

    ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , year=

    Lin, Di and Dai, Jifeng and Jia, Jiaya and He, Kaiming and Sun, Jian , booktitle=. ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , year=

  17. [17]

    Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2016 , doi =

    2016

  18. [18]

    Segmentation only uses sparse annotations: Unified weakly and semi-supervised learning in medical images , volume =

    Feng Gao and Minhao Hu and Min Er Zhong and Shixiang Feng and Xuwei Tian and Xiaochun Meng and Ma yi di li Ni-jia-ti and Zeping Huang and Minyi Lv and Tao Song and Xiaofan Zhang and Xiaoguang Zou and Xiaojian Wu , doi =. Segmentation only uses sparse annotations: Unified weakly and semi-supervised learning in medical images , volume =. Medical Image Analy...

    2022

  19. [19]

    Medical Image Analysis , month =

    Kervadec, Hoel and Dolz, Jose and Tang, Meng and Granger, Eric and Boykov, Yuri and. Medical Image Analysis , month =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.02.009 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.02.009 2019

  20. [20]

    BMC Medical Imaging , month =

    Yang, Guanyu and Wang, Chuanxia and Yang, Jian and Chen, Yang and Tang, Lijun and Shao, Pengfei and Dillenseger, Jean-Louis and Shu, Huazhong and Luo, Limin , doi =. BMC Medical Imaging , month =

  21. [21]

    Computers in Biology and Medicine , month =

    Liu, Xiaoming and Liu, Qi and Zhang, Ying and Wang, Man and Tang, Jinshan , doi =. Computers in Biology and Medicine , month =

  22. [22]

    and Tuia, Devis , doi =

    Maggiolo, Luca and Marcos, Diego and Moser, Gabriele and Serpico, Sebastiano B. and Tuia, Devis , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , keywords =. 2022 , url =

    2022

  23. [23]

    Remote Sensing , keywords =

    Mazhar, Sarah and Sun, Guangmin and Bilal, Anas and Hassan, Bilal and Li, Yu and Zhang, Junjie and Lin, Yinyi and Khan, Ali and Ahmed, Ramsha and Hassan, Taimur , doi =. Remote Sensing , keywords =. 2022 , url =

    2022

  24. [24]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , keywords =

    Gbodjo, Yawogan Jean Eudes and Montet, Olivier and Ienco, Dino and Gaetano, Raffaele and Dupuy, Stephane , doi =. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , keywords =

  25. [25]

    Tree Energy Loss: Towards Sparsely Annotated Semantic Segmentation , url =

    Zhiyuan Liang and Tiancai Wang and Xiangyu Zhang and Jian Sun and Jianbing Shen , doi =. Tree Energy Loss: Towards Sparsely Annotated Semantic Segmentation , url =. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2022

  26. [26]

    One Thing One Click: A Self-Training Approach for Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Segmentation , url =

    Zhengzhe Liu and Xiaojuan Qi and Chi-Wing Fu , doi =. One Thing One Click: A Self-Training Approach for Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Segmentation , url =. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2021

  27. [27]

    2017 , eprint=

    Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  28. [28]

    Learning to Segment Medical Images with Scribble-Supervision Alone

    Can, Yigit B. and Chaitanya, Krishna and Mustafa, Basil and Koch, Lisa M. and Konukoglu, Ender and Baumgartner, Christian F. , booktitle =. Learning to Segment Medical Images with Scribble-Supervision Alone , url =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_27 , editor =. arXiv , arxivId =:1807.04668 , isbn =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_27

  29. [29]

    Arnab, Anurag and Zheng, Shuai and Jayasumana, Sadeep and Romera-Paredes, Bernardino and Larsson, Mans and Kirillov, Alexander and Savchynskyy, Bogdan and Rother, Carsten and Kahl, Fredrik and Torr, Philip H.S. , doi =. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , month =

  30. [30]

    PyMIC: A deep learning toolkit for annotation-efficient medical image segmentation , journal =

    Guotai Wang and Xiangde Luo and Ran Gu and Shuojue Yang and Yijie Qu and Shuwei Zhai and Qianfei Zhao and Kang Li and Shaoting Zhang , keywords =. PyMIC: A deep learning toolkit for annotation-efficient medical image segmentation , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107398 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107398 2023

  31. [31]

    Deep Active Learning for Joint Classification & Segmentation with Weak Annotator , url =

    Soufiane Belharbi and Ismail Ben Ayed and Luke McCaffrey and Eric Granger , doi =. Deep Active Learning for Joint Classification & Segmentation with Weak Annotator , url =. 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , month =

    2021

  32. [32]

    A framework of active learning and semi-supervised learning for lithology identification based on improved naive Bayes , volume =

    Quan Ren and Hongbing Zhang and Dailu Zhang and Xiang Zhao and Lizhi Yan and Jianwen Rui and Fanxin Zeng and Xinyi Zhu , doi =. A framework of active learning and semi-supervised learning for lithology identification based on improved naive Bayes , volume =. Expert Systems with Applications , keywords =. 2022 , url=

    2022

  33. [33]

    Active Learning for Improved Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation in Satellite Images , url =

    Shasvat Desai and Debasmita Ghose , doi =. Active Learning for Improved Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation in Satellite Images , url =. 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , month =

    2022

  34. [34]

    Journal of Field Robotics , keywords =

    Alonso, I. Journal of Field Robotics , keywords =. 2019 , url=. doi:10.1002/rob.21915 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1002/rob.21915 2019

  35. [35]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_2 , editor =

    Lee, Hyeonsoo and Jeong, Won-Ki , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_2 , editor =. arXiv , arxivId =:2006.12890 , isbn =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_2 2006

  36. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , volume=

    Half a percent of labels is enough: Efficient animal detection in UAV imagery using deep CNNs and active learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  37. [37]

    Learning Loss for Active Learning , url =

    Donggeun Yoo and In So Kweon , doi =. Learning Loss for Active Learning , url =. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2019

  38. [38]

    Dugger and Sen-Ching Cheung and Chen-Nee Chuah , doi =

    Zhengfeng Lai and Chao Wang and Luca Cerny Oliveira and Brittany N. Dugger and Sen-Ching Cheung and Chen-Nee Chuah , doi =. Joint Semi-supervised and Active Learning for Segmentation of Gigapixel Pathology Images with Cost-Effective Labeling , url =. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) , month =

    2021

  39. [39]

    Multiple Instance Active Learning for Object Detection , url =

    Tianning Yuan and Fang Wan and Mengying Fu and Jianzhuang Liu and Songcen Xu and Xiangyang Ji and Qixiang Ye , doi =. Multiple Instance Active Learning for Object Detection , url =. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2021

  40. [40]

    Integrating active learning and semi-supervised learning for improved data-driven HVAC fault diagnosis performance , volume =

    Cheng Fan and Qiuting Wu and Yang Zhao and Like Mo , doi =. Integrating active learning and semi-supervised learning for improved data-driven HVAC fault diagnosis performance , volume =. Applied Energy , keywords =. 2024 , url=

    2024

  41. [41]

    Think Twice Before Selection: Federated Evidential Active Learning for Medical Image Analysis with Domain Shifts , url =

    Jiayi Chen and Benteng Ma and Hengfei Cui and Yong Xia , doi =. Think Twice Before Selection: Federated Evidential Active Learning for Medical Image Analysis with Domain Shifts , url =. 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2024

  42. [42]

    Active Learning for Single-Stage Object Detection in UAV Images , url =

    Asma Yamani and Albandari Alyami and Hamzah Luqman and Bernard Ghanem and Silvio Giancola , doi =. Active Learning for Single-Stage Object Detection in UAV Images , url =. 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , month =

    2024

  43. [43]

    2024 , eprint=

    ESA: Annotation-Efficient Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    2024

  44. [44]

    EasySeg: An Error-Aware Domain Adaptation Framework for Remote Sensing Imagery Semantic Segmentation via Interactive Learning and Active Learning , volume =

    Liangzhe Yang and Hao Chen and Anran Yang and Jun Li , doi =. EasySeg: An Error-Aware Domain Adaptation Framework for Remote Sensing Imagery Semantic Segmentation via Interactive Learning and Active Learning , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , keywords =. 2024 , url=

    2024

  45. [45]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , volume=

    Bounding box-free instance segmentation using semi-supervised iterative learning for vehicle detection , author=. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  46. [46]

    de Carvalho, Osmar L. F. and de Carvalho Júnior, Osmar A. and de Albuquerque, Anesmar O. and Santana, Nickolas C. and Borges, Díbio L. , journal=. Rethinking Panoptic Segmentation in Remote Sensing: A Hybrid Approach Using Semantic Segmentation and Non-Learning Methods , year=. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2022.3172207 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3172207 2022

  47. [47]

    PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation With Prototype Alignment , year=

    Wang, Kaixin and Liew, Jun Hao and Zou, Yingtian and Zhou, Daquan and Feng, Jiashi , booktitle=. PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation With Prototype Alignment , year=. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2019.00929 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00929 2019

  48. [48]

    2021 , eprint=

    Few-Shot Segmentation Without Meta-Learning: A Good Transductive Inference Is All You Need? , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  49. [49]

    Otaduy, and Dan Casas

    Lüddecke, Timo and Ecker, Alexander , booktitle=. Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Prompts , year=. doi:10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00695 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00695 2022

  50. [50]

    2023 , eprint=

    Segment Everything Everywhere All at Once , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  51. [51]

    2017 , eprint=

    One-Shot Learning for Semantic Segmentation , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  52. [52]

    HAL-IA: A Hybrid Active Learning framework using Interactive Annotation for medical image segmentation , volume =

    Xiaokang Li and Menghua Xia and Jing Jiao and Shichong Zhou and Cai Chang and Yuanyuan Wang and Yi Guo , doi =. HAL-IA: A Hybrid Active Learning framework using Interactive Annotation for medical image segmentation , volume =. Medical Image Analysis , keywords =. 2023 , url=

    2023

  53. [53]

    Cold-start active learning for image classification , volume =

    Qiuye Jin and Mingzhi Yuan and Shiman Li and Haoran Wang and Manning Wang and Zhijian Song , doi =. Cold-start active learning for image classification , volume =. Information Sciences , keywords =. 2022 , url=

    2022

  54. [54]

    Structured Sparse R-CNN for Direct Scene Graph Generation , year =

    Teng, Yao and Wang, Limin , doi =. Structured Sparse R-CNN for Direct Scene Graph Generation , year =. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    2022

  55. [55]

    Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learning , year =

    Aneesh Rangnekar and Christopher Kanan and Matthew Hoffman , doi =. Semantic Segmentation with Active Semi-Supervised Learning , year =. 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , month =

    2023

  56. [56]

    GitHub repository , Howpublished =

    Pavel Iakubovskii , Title =. GitHub repository , Howpublished =. 2019 , Publisher =

    2019

  57. [57]

    International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention , pages=

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , author=. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention , pages=. 2015 , doi=

    2015

  58. [58]

    2019 , editor =

    Tan, Mingxing and Le, Quoc , booktitle =. 2019 , editor =. 1905.11946 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Tailornet: Predict- ing clothing in 3d as a function of human pose, shape and garment style

    Siddiqui, Yawar and Valentin, Julien and Niessner, Matthias , booktitle=. ViewAL: Active Learning With Viewpoint Entropy for Semantic Segmentation , year=. doi:10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00945 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00945 2020

  60. [60]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , volume=

    DIAL: Deep interactive and active learning for semantic segmentation in remote sensing , author=. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  61. [61]

    Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentation , year=

    Khoreva, Anna and Benenson, Rodrigo and Hosang, Jan and Hein, Matthias and Schiele, Bernt , booktitle=. Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentation , year=

  62. [62]

    2018 , eprint=

    CEREALS - Cost-Effective REgion-based Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation , author=. 2018 , eprint=

    2018

  63. [63]

    2020 , eprint=

    Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learning , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    2020

  64. [64]

    2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , title=

    Vu, Tuan-Hung and Jain, Himalaya and Bucher, Maxime and Cord, Matthieu and P. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , title=. 2019 , pages=. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00262 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00262 2019

  65. [65]

    Taking a Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-Level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptation , year=

    Luo, Yawei and Zheng, Liang and Guan, Tao and Yu, Junqing and Yang, Yi , booktitle=. Taking a Closer Look at Domain Shift: Category-Level Adversaries for Semantics Consistent Domain Adaptation , year=. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00261 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00261 2019

  66. [66]

    2023 , eprint=

    Iterative Loop Method Combining Active and Semi-supervised Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  67. [67]

    , booktitle=

    Wu, Tsung-Han and Liou, Yi-Syuan and Yuan, Shao-Ji and Lee, Hsin-Ying and Chen, Tung-I and Huang, Kuan-Chih and Hsu, Winston H. , booktitle=. 2022 , pages=. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19818-2_26 , eprint=

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19818-2_26 2022

  68. [68]

    Otaduy, and Dan Casas

    Xie, Binhui and Yuan, Longhui and Li, Shuang and Liu, Chi Harold and Cheng, Xinjing , booktitle=. Towards Fewer Annotations: Active Learning via Region Impurity and Prediction Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation , year=. doi:10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00790 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00790 2022

  69. [69]

    2023 , volume=

    Ning, Munan and Lu, Donghuan and Xie, Yujia and Chen, Dongdong and Wei, Dong and Zheng, Yefeng and Tian, Yonghong and Yan, Shuicheng and Yuan, Li , journal=. 2023 , volume=. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3293893 , url=

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3293893 2023

  70. [70]

    2026 , publisher =

    de Carvalho, Osmar Luiz Ferreira and de Carvalho J. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20635237 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20635237 2026

  71. [71]

    2026 , publisher =

    de Carvalho, Osmar Luiz Ferreira , title =. 2026 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20596185 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20596185 2026

  72. [72]

    and Chen, Xiaojiang and Wang, Xin , title =

    Ren, Pengzhen and Xiao, Yun and Chang, Xiaojun and Huang, Po-Yao and Li, Zhihui and Gupta, Brij B. and Chen, Xiaojiang and Wang, Xin , title =. 2021 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3472291 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1145/3472291 2021

  73. [73]

    International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation , volume=

    The segment anything model (sam) for remote sensing applications: From zero to one shot , author=. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  74. [74]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , volume=

    One class one click: Quasi scene-level weakly supervised point cloud semantic segmentation with active learning , author=. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  75. [75]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=

    Adaptive Superpixel for Active Learning in Semantic Segmentation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  76. [76]

    2024 , publisher=

    Li, Zihan and Zheng, Yuan and Shan, Dandan and Yang, Shuzhou and Li, Qingde and Wang, Beizhan and Zhang, Yuanting and Hong, Qingqi and Shen, Dinggang , journal=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  77. [77]

    2025 , publisher=

    Yang, Lihe and Zhao, Zhen and Zhao, Hengshuang , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  78. [78]

    AI Magazine , volume=

    Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning , author=. AI Magazine , volume=. 2014 , doi=

    2014

  79. [79]

    Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=

    Human-in-the-loop machine learning: a state of the art , author=. Artificial Intelligence Review , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  80. [80]

    Future Generation Computer Systems , volume=

    A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning , author=. Future Generation Computer Systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

Showing first 80 references.