pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11084 · v1 · pith:KIISWPXRnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

High-Resolution ALMA Imaging for a Gravitationally-lensed Quasar at z=6.5: Constraining the AGN Contribution to Galactic-Scale Dust Heating

Minghao Yue , Xiaohui Fan , Anna-Christina Eilers , Jinyi Yang , Feige Wang , Jianwei Lyu , James W. Nightingale , Ann Zabludoff
show 1 more author
Ran Wang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshift quasarsgravitational lensingALMA observationsdust continuumAGN heatingstar formation ratesradiative transfer
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a z=6.5 lensed quasar, AGN heating contributes only about 13% to the total sub-millimeter dust emission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents high-resolution ALMA observations of the dust continuum in a gravitationally lensed quasar at redshift 6.52, achieving source-plane resolution down to tens of parsecs after lens modeling. The authors reconstruct the emission map and apply a radiative transfer model that separates dust heating by the central AGN from heating by stars throughout the host galaxy. The model shows AGN-heated dust dominates only in the inner 100 pc while star-heated dust dominates at larger radii, leading to an AGN contribution of roughly 13 percent of the total sub-mm flux. This result indicates that far-infrared luminosity has previously been used to overestimate star formation rates in most high-redshift quasars by a modest amount.

Core claim

The reconstructed source-plane continuum shows a compact core of size less than or equal to 200 pc. The best-fit radiative transfer model indicates that heated dust from the active galactic nucleus dominates the sub-millimeter emission at radii less than or equal to 100 pc while star-heated dust dominates the outer region of the host galaxy. AGN heating therefore contributes approximately 13 percent to the observed sub-mm flux, implying that previous far-infrared-based star formation rate measurements for most high-redshift quasars are likely mildly overestimated.

What carries the argument

A radiative transfer model applied to the source-plane dust continuum map that partitions emission into AGN-heated and star-heated components based on assumed dust properties and geometry.

If this is right

  • AGN-heated dust dominates sub-mm emission only within the inner 100 pc of the host galaxy.
  • Star-heated dust dominates the outer region of the host galaxy.
  • AGN heating contributes approximately 13 percent to the total observed sub-mm flux.
  • Previous far-infrared-based star formation rate measurements for most high-redshift quasars are likely mildly overestimated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modeling approach could be applied to other strongly lensed high-redshift quasars to test whether the 13 percent AGN fraction is typical.
  • If the inner AGN dominance and outer stellar dominance hold generally, then AGN effects on dust heating remain spatially localized even at sub-millimeter wavelengths.
  • Higher-resolution observations of additional targets could map the precise transition radius between the two heating regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The radiative transfer model correctly partitions the observed dust emission profile into AGN versus stellar heating components using the assumed dust properties, geometry, and heating sources.

What would settle it

An independent star formation rate measurement from a tracer such as radio synchrotron or CO line luminosity that, after subtracting a 13 percent AGN contribution, differs substantially from the far-infrared estimate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11084 by Anna-Christina Eilers, Ann Zabludoff, Feige Wang, James W. Nightingale, Jianwei Lyu, Jinyi Yang, Minghao Yue, Ran Wang, Xiaohui Fan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The clean image for the continuum emission of 1 J0439+1634. The image is produced using the CASA task tclean using Briggs weighting (with robust = 0.5). The beam size is 0. ′′078×0. ′′040, shown as the white ellipse at the lower leftcorner. The 1σ sensitivity is 0.02 mJy/beam. The two bright blobs are the lensed images of the quasar host galaxy’s central region, and the diffused emission shows the lensed a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The best-fit lensing model for the dust continuum. Top left: the observed dirty image; Top right: the best-fit model dirty image; Bottom left: the residual map; Bottom right: the source-plane emission. The red lines mark the caustics of the lensing potential, which exhibits a naked-cusp structure. The source plane emission shows a compact bright core and a fainter outskirt with some irregular features. The… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Re-analyzing the HST image using the ALMA-based lensing model. Left: the ACS/WFC F782N image, which was used to build the lensing model in X. Fan et al. (2019). Middle: the best-fit image using the ALMA-based lensing model. The red lines mark the lensing caustics, and the cyan crosses mark the lensed images of the optical quasar. Right: the residual image. The yellow ellipse shows the position and shape (i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Modeling the sub-mm continuum emission of J0439+1634 using skirt. Top left: the reconstructed source-plane surface brightness; Top middle: the best-fit skirt model; Top right: the residual; Bottom left: the dust temperature map of the best-fit model; Bottom middle: the flux ratio between the no-AGN model and the best-fit model; Bottom right: the 1D profile of the source-plane surface brightness, the best-f… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present high-resolution (beam size $0\farcs076\times0\farcs040$) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of the far-infrared $(\lambda_\text{rest}=162.7\mu\rm{m})$ dust continuum of J0439+1634, a gravitationally lensed quasar at $z=6.52$. We perform pixelated lens modeling for the visibility data, finding that J0439+1634 is well-described by a singular isothermal ellipsoid plus an external shear lensing model. The best-fit lensing potential exhibits a naked-cusp configuration, confirming the finding in Fan et al. (2019). The reconstructed source plane continuum emission shows a compact bright core, with size $\lesssim200$ pc and peak brightness $\sim0.6 \text{ Jy arcsec}^{-2}$. The total continuum flux at 245 GHz is $3.36\pm0.02$ mJy. The flux magnification is {$4.63\pm0.03$}, indicating an average source-plane resolution of $0\farcs019$ (equivalent to 104 pc). The spatial resolution around the supermassive black hole reaches $\sim36$ pc. %Using the new lensing model, we re-fit the Hubble Space Telescope image for J0439+1634, and find that the position of the optical quasar is consistent with the brightest pixel in the dust continuum map. Leveraging the exceptional source-plane resolution, we build a radiative transfer model to describe the observed dust emission profile. The best-fit model indicates that heated dust from the active galactic nucleus (AGN) dominates the sub-millimeter emission at $r\lesssim100$ pc and that star-heated dust dominates the outer region of the host galaxy. AGN heating contributes {$\sim13\%$} to the observed sub-mm flux. Therefore, previous far-infrared-based star formation rate measurements for most high-redshift quasars are likely mildly overestimated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents high-resolution ALMA observations of the gravitationally lensed quasar J0439+1634 at z=6.52. Pixelated lens modeling of the visibility data yields a magnification of 4.63±0.03 and a reconstructed source-plane dust continuum with a compact core of size ≲200 pc. A radiative transfer model is then fitted to this profile, concluding that AGN-heated dust dominates within r≲100 pc while star-heated dust dominates at larger radii, with the AGN contributing approximately 13% to the total 245 GHz flux. The authors conclude that previous FIR-based SFR measurements for high-redshift quasars are likely mildly overestimated.

Significance. If the radiative transfer decomposition holds, the result provides a valuable empirical constraint on the relative contributions of AGN and stellar heating to the sub-millimeter emission in a z>6 quasar host galaxy. The ~36 pc resolution near the central black hole is particularly noteworthy and could inform models of AGN feedback and dust heating in the early universe. The work also demonstrates the power of strong lensing for achieving high physical resolution in high-redshift sources.

major comments (1)
  1. [radiative transfer model description] The section describing the radiative transfer model (following the lensing reconstruction): The manuscript provides no details on the radiative transfer fitting procedure, the specific dust parameters (opacity, grain size distribution, emissivity), the assumed geometry and luminosity for the central AGN point source versus the distributed stellar heating component, the free versus fixed parameters, or any goodness-of-fit metrics. The central claim that AGN heating contributes ~13% to the observed sub-mm flux and dominates at r≲100 pc rests entirely on the output of this model; without these elements the stability of the 13% fraction under plausible alternative assumptions cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains LaTeX artifacts such as {$4.63\pm0.03$} and {\sim13\%}; these should be cleaned for the final version.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the constructive comment on the radiative transfer modeling section. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section describing the radiative transfer model (following the lensing reconstruction): The manuscript provides no details on the radiative transfer fitting procedure, the specific dust parameters (opacity, grain size distribution, emissivity), the assumed geometry and luminosity for the central AGN point source versus the distributed stellar heating component, the free versus fixed parameters, or any goodness-of-fit metrics. The central claim that AGN heating contributes ~13% to the observed sub-mm flux and dominates at r≲100 pc rests entirely on the output of this model; without these elements the stability of the 13% fraction under plausible alternative assumptions cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript omitted key technical details on the radiative transfer model, which limits the ability to evaluate the robustness of the reported 13% AGN contribution. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection immediately following the lensing reconstruction that fully specifies: (i) the radiative transfer code and fitting procedure (including whether a grid search or MCMC was employed); (ii) the adopted dust opacity law, grain size distribution, and emissivity index; (iii) the geometry and luminosity of the central AGN point source versus the spatially distributed stellar heating component; (iv) which parameters were allowed to vary and which were held fixed; and (v) quantitative goodness-of-fit statistics. These additions will enable readers to test the stability of the 13% fraction under alternative assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: AGN fraction from independent RT model fit to reconstructed profile

full rationale

The paper's central result (~13% AGN contribution) is produced by fitting a radiative transfer model to the source-plane brightness profile obtained from ALMA visibility modeling. This fit incorporates assumed dust properties, geometry, and heating sources but does not reduce by the paper's equations to a quantity defined solely in terms of a fitted normalization, self-citation, or input data. The lensing model confirms Fan et al. (2019) but is not load-bearing for the heating partition; the derivation remains self-contained against the observed continuum data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the singular isothermal ellipsoid plus external shear lensing model and on the radiative-transfer assumptions used to separate AGN and stellar heating; both are domain-standard but untested in the provided abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • radiative transfer model parameters for AGN and stellar heating
    Parameters controlling the radial heating profiles are adjusted to match the reconstructed source-plane emission.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The singular isothermal ellipsoid plus external shear model accurately reproduces the observed lensed morphology.
    Invoked for pixelated lens modeling of the visibility data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5954 in / 1346 out tokens · 24779 ms · 2026-06-27T12:42:14.577557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F., et al

    Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Quataert, E., Hopkins, P. F., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac09e8 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy ...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac09e8 2021

  2. [2]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    Camps, P., & Baes, M. 2020, Astronomy and Computing, 31, 100381, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100381 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100381 2020

  3. [3]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa Di Mascia, F., Carniani, S., Gallerani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 3667, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3306

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa 2018

  4. [4]

    Fan, X., Ba˜ nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 373, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455 2023

  5. [5]

    2019, ApJL, 870, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe

    Fan, X., Wang, F., Yang, J., et al. 2019, ApJL, 870, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaeffe 2019

  6. [6]

    A., et al

    Fraser-McKelvie, A., van de Sande, J., Gadotti, D. A., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A237, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452891 G¨ uver, T., &¨Ozel, F. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2050, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452891 2025

  7. [7]

    D., Dalal, N., Marrone, D

    Hezaveh, Y. D., Dalal, N., Marrone, D. P., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 37, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/37

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/37 2016

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psz096

    Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 111, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz096

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz096 2019

  9. [9]

    Lange, J. U. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 3181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2441

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2441 2023

  10. [10]

    C., Marrone, D

    Litke, K. C., Marrone, D. P., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf057

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf057 2019

  11. [11]

    Extreme Galaxy-scale Outflows Are Frequent among Luminous Early Quasars

    Liu, W., Fan, X., Li, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.08793, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.08793

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.08793 2025

  12. [12]

    2022, Universe, 8, 304, doi: 10.3390/universe8060304

    Lyu, J., & Rieke, G. 2022, Universe, 8, 304, doi: 10.3390/universe8060304

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8060304 2022

  13. [13]

    Lyu, J., & Rieke, G. H. 2018, ApJ, 866, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae075

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae075 2018

  14. [14]

    Lyu, J., & Rieke, G. H. 2021, ApJ, 912, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abee14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abee14 2021

  15. [15]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 2708, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf161

    Maresca, J., & Dye, S. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2708, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf161

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf161 2025

  16. [16]

    A., Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al

    Marshall, M. A., Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452650

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452650 2025

  17. [17]

    2019a, ApJ, 883, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c60

    Matsuoka, Y., Iwasawa, K., Onoue, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c60

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c60 2019

  18. [18]

    2025, A&A, 694, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451290

    Mazzucchelli, C., Decarli, R., Belladitta, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451290

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451290 2025

  19. [19]

    A., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., & Venemans, B

    Meyer, R. A., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., & Venemans, B. 2023, ApJ, 956, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf047

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf047 2023

  20. [20]

    P., et al

    Neeleman, M., Novak, M., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe70f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe70f 2021

  21. [21]

    W., & Dye, S

    Nightingale, J. W., & Dye, S. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2940, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1455

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1455 2015

  22. [22]

    W., Dye, S., & Massey, R

    Nightingale, J. W., Dye, S., & Massey, R. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1264

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1264 2018

  23. [23]

    W., Hayes, R

    Nightingale, J. W., Hayes, R. G., Kelly, A., et al. 2021, J. Open Source Softw., 6, 2825, doi: 10.21105/joss.02825

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.02825 2021

  24. [24]

    2010, glafic: Software Package for Analyzing Gravitational Lensing,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.012 http://ascl.net/1010.012

    Oguri, M. 2010, glafic: Software Package for Analyzing Gravitational Lensing,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.012 http://ascl.net/1010.012

    2010

  25. [25]

    D., et al.\ 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1541

    Onoue, M., Ding, X., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 1541, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02628-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02628-1 2025

  26. [26]

    2020, A&A, 637, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936634

    Pensabene, A., Carniani, S., Perna, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936634

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936634 2020

  27. [27]

    P., et al

    Powell, D., Vegetti, S., McKean, J. P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 515, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2740

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2740 2021

  28. [28]

    D., Daddi, E., Tan, Q.-H., et al

    Silverman, J. D., Daddi, E., Tan, Q.-H., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag167, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag167 10

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag167 2026

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Suyu, S. H., Marshall, P. J., Hobson, M. P., & Blandford, R. D. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 983, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10733.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10733.x 2006

  30. [30]

    R., & Battisti, A

    Tsukui, T., Wisnioski, E., Krumholz, M. R., & Battisti, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 4654, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1464

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1464 2023

  31. [31]

    P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJL, 874, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab11cc

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab11cc 2019

  32. [32]

    P., Walter, F., Neeleman, M., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Walter, F., Neeleman, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc563

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc563 2020

  33. [33]

    2009, Nature, 457, 699, doi: 10.1038/nature07681

    Walter, F., Riechers, D., Cox, P., et al. 2009, Nature, 457, 699, doi: 10.1038/nature07681

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07681 2009

  34. [34]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac49e8

    Walter, F., Neeleman, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac49e8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac49e8 2022

  35. [35]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5 2019

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2021, ApJL, 907, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6 2021

  37. [37]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3fb4 2024

  38. [38]

    J., & Dye, S

    Warren, S. J., & Dye, S. 2003, ApJ, 590, 673, doi: 10.1086/375132

    work page doi:10.1086/375132 2003

  39. [39]

    2019, AJ, 157, 236, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1be1

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2019a, AJ, 157, 236, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1be1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1be1

  40. [40]

    2019b, ApJ, 880, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a02

    Yang, J., Venemans, B., Wang, F., et al. 2019b, ApJ, 880, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a02

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a02

  41. [41]

    2020, ApJL, 897, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2020, ApJL, 897, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26 2020

  42. [42]

    2022, ApJL, 924, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac45f2

    Yang, J., Fan, X., Wang, F., et al. 2022, ApJL, 924, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac45f2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac45f2 2022

  43. [43]

    2022a, ApJ, 925, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac409b

    Yue, M., Fan, X., Yang, J., & Wang, F. 2022a, ApJ, 925, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac409b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac409b

  44. [44]

    2022b, AJ, 163, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4cb0

    Yue, M., Fan, X., Yang, J., & Wang, F. 2022b, AJ, 163, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4cb0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac4cb0

  45. [45]

    2021, ApJ, 917, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0af4

    Yue, M., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0af4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0af4 2021

  46. [46]

    A., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3914

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3914 2024

  47. [47]

    J., Ho, L

    Zhu, Y., Rieke, M. J., Ho, L. C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.02305, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.02305

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02305 2025