pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11317 · v1 · pith:VQKPDDPOnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.other· hep-lat· hep-ph

Lectures on Semiclassical Methods for Composite Operators

Francesco Sannino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.otherhep-lathep-ph
keywords semiclassical methodscomposite operatorsWilson-Fisher fixed pointscaling dimensionsO(N) phi^4 theoryLamé equationfluctuation determinantsconformal field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

The one-loop large-n scaling dimensions of composite operators at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point follow from the Lamé fluctuation spectrum around the classical elliptic solution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The lecture notes establish a semiclassical route to the scaling dimensions of operators such as phi to the power n by mapping them, via the state-operator correspondence, to energies of highly occupied states on a spatial sphere. In the free scalar theory the exact dimension is recovered through three independent routes that include the action variable and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization. At the interacting Wilson-Fisher fixed point the same logic is applied in the double-scaling limit: a classical elliptic saddle is identified, its small oscillations are governed by the Lamé equation, and the resulting spectrum together with zero-mode and Gel'fand-Yaglom determinants supplies the one-loop correction. A reader cares because the construction turns the problem of heavy composite operators into an ordinary semiclassical calculation whose ingredients are explicitly computable.

Core claim

At the Wilson-Fisher fixed point of the O(N) phi^4 theory in d equals 4 minus epsilon, the leading large-n correction to the scaling dimension of phi^n is obtained from the one-loop fluctuation determinant around the classical elliptic solution on the cylinder; the fluctuation operator reduces to the Lamé equation whose eigenvalues, combined with the contribution of the two zero modes and the Gel'fand-Yaglom evaluation of the functional determinant, give the explicit shift in the energy.

What carries the argument

The classical elliptic saddle on the cylinder whose small fluctuations obey the Lamé equation, with the resulting spectrum and Gel'fand-Yaglom determinant supplying the one-loop shift to the scaling dimension.

If this is right

  • The free-field result for the dimension of phi^n is reproduced exactly by three independent semiclassical routes.
  • The same elliptic-saddle plus Lamé-spectrum construction yields the one-loop correction at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point.
  • Composite operators serve as probes of collective sectors that can be extended to gauge theories and asymptotically safe models.
  • Periodic-orbit techniques such as the Gutzwiller trace formula become available once the classical saddles are known.
  • The double-scaling limit organizes the expansion so that the classical action and the one-loop determinant are the leading terms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same saddle-plus-fluctuation logic could be tested in other fixed-point theories where a large-n or large-charge limit exists.
  • Comparison of the semiclassical formula against known epsilon-expansion results at moderate n would indicate the size of higher-loop corrections.
  • The method may supply non-perturbative input that can be fed into numerical bootstrap studies of operator spectra.
  • Analogous constructions might apply to supersymmetric theories where some dimensions are protected and can serve as benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

That the semiclassical approximation around the elliptic solution plus one loop of fluctuations remains valid and captures the leading large-n behavior even after the theory is deformed to the interacting fixed point.

What would settle it

A direct lattice or higher-order perturbative computation of the scaling dimension of phi^n for sufficiently large n that yields a numerical value differing from the one-loop semiclassical formula by more than the expected higher-order corrections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11317 by Francesco Sannino.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: gathers the five parts in one place, with the chapters each one spans and what it [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: The five parts of these notes and what each delivers. Parts I–II build the language [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: The logical spine of these notes: from a critical system to the scaling dimension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Expanding to first order in b, one finds Sb(x) µ = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Special conformal transformation as inversion–translation–inversion. Left: A regular Cartesian grid in flat space. Centre: After the inversion x µ 7→ x µ/|x| 2 ; straight lines not passing through the origin are mapped to circles passing through the origin. Right: The full special conformal transformation with parameter b = (0.35, 0.15). The reference circle is mapped to another circle, illustrating that… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: The conformal multiplet. Starting from a primary state |O⟩ (bottom, blue) satisfying Kµ|O⟩ = 0, repeated action of the momentum operator Pµ (red arrows, upward) generates descendants at dimensions ∆, ∆ + 1, ∆ + 2, . . . The number of independent states at level n equals the number of symmetric tensors of rank n, namely d+n−1 n  . The special￾conformal generator Kµ (blue arrow, downward) lowers the dimen… view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: The two-point function fixes the scaling dimension. Conformal invariance uniquely determines ⟨O(x) O(0)⟩ = CO |x| −2∆; the only free parameter is the dimension ∆. Left: Linear scale for ∆ = 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5; higher dimensions decay faster. Right: Log–log scale, where the relation becomes a straight line with slope −2∆. Measuring the slope of the two￾point function in a log–log plot is therefore the direct … view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Radial quantization: the conformal map τ = ln |x| sends R d (left, shown with constant-r circles) to the cylinder R × S d−1 (right). The operator insertion O(0) at the origin maps to the state |O⟩ at τ → −∞; spatial infinity maps to τ → +∞. Dilatations in R d become τ -translations on the cylinder. 45 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Correlators as cylinder amplitudes. Left: Two operator insertions at |x1| = r1 and |x2| = r2 > r1 in flat space. Right: On the cylinder, these become states on the S d−1 slices at τ1 = ln r1 and τ2 = ln r2; the two-point function is the matrix element of e −D ∆τ where D is the dilatation operator (cylinder Hamiltonian). Inserting a complete set of eigenstates D|∆⟩ = ∆|∆⟩ yields the OPE decomposition P ∆ … view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: Saddle-point sharpening. The path-integral weight e −n Seff [φ] (normalised to its maximum) for a schematic parabolic effective action Seff = 1 2 φ 2 . As n increases from 1 (left) to 20 (right), the weight concentrates sharply around the saddle at φ = 0, making the semiclassical approximation increasingly accurate. This is why large n plays the role of 1/ℏ. 5.2.2 Saddle-point equation and its solution 5… view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: Classical periodic orbits in phase space. Each closed orbit (v, Π) satisfies H(v, Π) = En and corresponds to one period of the harmonic solution v(t) = A cos(µt + t0); in rescaled variables the orbits are concentric circles with radius ∝ √ n. The Bohr–Sommerfeld condition I = H Π dv = 2πn selects the discrete family (coloured by n, see legend); the shaded region (n = 3, grey) has area equal to the action… view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: Action variable and Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization. For a harmonic oscilla￾tor with frequency µ, I(E) = 2πE/µ is linear in E. The condition I(En) = 2πn (dashed lines) selects energy levels En = nµ, reproducing the exact quantum result. In the interacting theory the I(E) curve is nonlinear (set by the Jacobi-elliptic classical solution) but the same geometric construction applies. on the outward half), so e… view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Classical orbit structure of the Jacobi-elliptic solution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p082_6_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: Floquet multipliers and stability angles. Left: The monodromy eigenvalues λℓ,± = e ±iνℓ lie on the unit circle for stable orbits. Each angular-momentum mode ℓ acquires a distinct phase νℓ ∈ (0, π) after one orbital period T ; the functional determinant det ′O (2) ℓ = 4 sin2 (νℓ/2) measures the “opening” of that angle. Filled dots are e +iνℓ ; open dots are e −iνℓ . Right: Stability angles νℓ ∈ [0, π] com… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: illustrates this for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.1. Figure 8.1: β-function for the O(N) ϕ 4 theory (N = 1, Ising) in units of ˜g = β0λ, β0 = (N + 8)/8π 2 . Left: one-loop β-function (blue) at ϵ = 0.30. The filled circle marks the Wilson– Fisher fixed point at ˜g ∗ ≈ ϵ; the double-headed arrow shows that ϵ is the coupling-space distance from the Gaussian fixed point at the origin. Right: one-loop (blue, solid) vs. two-loop (red, dashed) at ϵ = 0.30. The two-loop corre… view at source ↗
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.2. Figure 8.2: Jacobi elliptic cosine solution of the quartic oscillator. The homogeneous classical solution can be written as v(t) = x0cn(ωt| m), with 0 ≤ m < 1/2. At m = 0, the solution reduces to the harmonic oscillator limit. As m increases, the quartic interaction becomes increasingly important. The period is T = 4K(m)/ω, with ω = µ/√ 1 − 2m. In this parametrization the endpoint m = 1/2 is singular and is not incl… view at source ↗
Figure 8.3
Figure 8.3. Figure 8.3: Leading classical coefficient C0(κ) = ∆cl/n in d = 4. The exact result (solid blue) is obtained by solving the Bohr–Sommerfeld condition (8.21) for the elliptic modulus m(κ) and substituting into (8.23), with κ = λn. (a) Log–log view over four decades in κ: C0 → 1 in the free limit κ → 0 (dotted green) and crosses over to the large-charge asymptote C0 ∼ A κ1/3 (dashed red), with A = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig… view at source ↗
Figure 8.4
Figure 8.4. Figure 8.4: Band structure of the κ = 1 (single-gap) Lam´e operator L1 governing the N−1 transverse fluctuations in d = 4. Blue shading: allowed bands [m, 1] and [1+m,∞). White strip: spectral gap (1, 1+m). Coloured lines: eigenvalues Λ1(ℓ) = 2m+(1−2m)(1+ℓ) 2 for ℓ = 0, 1, 2, 3. The ℓ = 0 zero mode (red) sits on the upper band edge for all m. The ℓ = 1 and ℓ = 2 modes enter the gap at m = 3 7 and m = 8 17 , respecti… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: already shown in [86], collects these predictions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p132_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8.6
Figure 8.6. Figure 8.6: ∆n in the three-dimensional Ising CFT for n ≤ 16, from the numerical bootstrap, the resummed ϵ-expansion, and semiclassics at LO and NLO. The NLO curve tracks the bootstrap wherever the latter exists, with agreement improving as n grows; the n = 6 NLO point is absent because the ℓ = 2 stability angle has gone complex (§8.2.10). For n ≳ 12 the most accurate prediction is expected to be the semiclassical N… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: collects the resulting pipeline in one place; the rest of this chapter retraces the logical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p136_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.1. Figure 9.1: The semiclassical pipeline for heavy composite operators, organised into its classi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p137_9_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ). The isomorphism of Section 2.2.3 is therefore correctly stated between the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p148_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

These lecture notes are intended as a coherent introduction to conformal field theory in general, and composite operators in particular, through a semiclassical framework for computing scaling dimensions, with emphasis on operators of the form $\phi^n$. In doing so, they aim to fill a gap in the literature and to help decode some of the relevant concepts. The physical idea is that at large $n$ an (heavy) operator creates a highly occupied state. Through the state-operator correspondence, this state lives on the cylinder $\mathbb{R}\times S^{d-1}$, and its scaling dimension is the corresponding energy of the theory on the cylinder. The notes are organized as a self-contained route from conformal symmetry to semiclassical dynamics. Part I reviews the conformal group, primary operators, radial quantization, the state-operator correspondence, and operator mixing. Part II builds the semiclassical framework, first in the free scalar theory, where the dimension of $\phi^n$ is recovered in three independent ways, and then through the double-scaling limit, the action variable, and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization. Part III develops the general machinery of periodic saddles, Floquet theory, fluctuation determinants, the Gel'fand-Yaglom method, and the Gutzwiller trace formula. Part IV applies the framework to the $O(N)$ $\phi^4$ theory in $d=4-\epsilon$ at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point, deriving the classical elliptic solution, the Lam\'e fluctuation spectrum, the zero modes, and the one-loop contribution to the large-$n$ scaling dimensions. Beyond the explicit computation, the notes emphasize the role of composite operators as probes of collective sectors of quantum field theory, with extensions to gauge theories, conformal windows, and asymptotically safe field theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. These lecture notes develop a semiclassical framework for computing large-n scaling dimensions of composite operators φ^n in CFTs. Starting from conformal symmetry, primaries, radial quantization and the state-operator correspondence, the notes recover the free scalar theory dimension in three independent ways, introduce the double-scaling limit together with action variables and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization, develop the general machinery of periodic saddles, Floquet theory, fluctuation determinants and the Gel'fand-Yaglom method, and apply the formalism to the O(N) φ^4 theory at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point in d=4-ε, obtaining the classical elliptic solution, the Lamé fluctuation spectrum, zero-mode handling and the one-loop correction to the scaling dimension.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the notes supply a coherent, self-contained route from conformal symmetry to an explicit one-loop result for heavy operators at an interacting fixed point. The recovery of the free-theory result by three independent routes and the explicit construction via the Lamé spectrum plus Gel'fand-Yaglom determinants around the elliptic saddle constitute clear strengths. The framework treats composite operators as probes of collective sectors and sketches extensions to gauge theories and asymptotically safe models. The assumption that the semiclassical approximation remains valid in the double-scaling limit does not appear to introduce internal inconsistency once the free-theory checks are performed.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Part II] Part II: the three independent recoveries of the free-theory dimension are presented sequentially; a short comparative table or paragraph summarizing the agreement would improve readability.
  2. [Part III] § on the Gel'fand-Yaglom method: the treatment of the zero modes arising from translational invariance on the cylinder could be expanded by one paragraph to make the subtraction of collective coordinates fully explicit for readers new to the technique.
  3. [Part IV] The final expression for the one-loop correction at the Wilson-Fisher point is derived but not isolated in a single displayed equation; placing it in a boxed result would aid citation and verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our lecture notes. The assessment correctly identifies the main strengths, including the three independent recoveries of the free-theory result and the explicit one-loop computation via the Lamé spectrum and Gel'fand-Yaglom method at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The notes recover the free-theory dimension of φ^n in three independent ways before introducing the double-scaling limit or elliptic saddles. The one-loop correction at the Wilson-Fisher point is obtained from the Lamé spectrum, zero-mode handling, and Gel'fand-Yaglom determinants applied to the classical solution; these steps rely on standard Floquet theory and determinant methods rather than fitted inputs or self-citation chains. No load-bearing premise reduces to a prior result by the same authors, and the framework begins from conformal symmetry and state-operator correspondence without smuggling ansätze or renaming empirical patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the notes rest on standard domain assumptions of conformal field theory and the validity of semiclassical methods at large n; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the provided description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Conformal symmetry, radial quantization, and the state-operator correspondence apply to the theories under consideration.
    The notes begin by reviewing these as the foundation for mapping operators to cylinder energies.
  • domain assumption The semiclassical approximation is reliable for highly occupied states created by φ^n at large n.
    This premise underpins the entire framework from the free theory through the Wilson-Fisher application.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5851 in / 1512 out tokens · 46283 ms · 2026-06-27T12:06:49.103885+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lenz,Beitrag zum verst¨ andnis der magnetischen erscheinungen in festen k¨ orpern, Physikalische Zeitschrift21(1920) 613

    W. Lenz,Beitrag zum verst¨ andnis der magnetischen erscheinungen in festen k¨ orpern, Physikalische Zeitschrift21(1920) 613

    1920

  2. [2]

    Ising,Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik31(1925) 253

    E. Ising,Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik31(1925) 253

    1925

  3. [3]

    Peierls,On ising’s model of ferromagnetism,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(1936) 477

    R. Peierls,On ising’s model of ferromagnetism,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(1936) 477

    1936

  4. [4]

    Kramers and G.H

    H.A. Kramers and G.H. Wannier,Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i, Physical Review60(1941) 252

    1941

  5. [5]

    Kramers and G.H

    H.A. Kramers and G.H. Wannier,Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part ii, Physical Review60(1941) 263

    1941

  6. [6]

    Onsager,Crystal statistics

    L. Onsager,Crystal statistics. i. a two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition,Physical Review65(1944) 117

    1944

  7. [7]

    and Mathieu, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Springer, New York (1997), 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  8. [8]

    Itzykson and J.-M

    C. Itzykson and J.-M. Drouffe,Statistical Field Theory. Vol. 2: Strong Coupling, Monte Carlo Methods, Conformal Field Theory, and Random Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    1989

  9. [9]

    Ginsparg,Applied conformal field theory, inFields, Strings and Critical Phenomena, E

    P. Ginsparg,Applied conformal field theory, inFields, Strings and Critical Phenomena, E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin, eds., vol. 49 ofLes Houches Summer School Proceedings, (Amsterdam), pp. 1–168, North-Holland (1990) [hep-th/9108028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990

  10. [10]

    Blumenhagen and E

    R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn,Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory, vol. 779 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009), 10.1007/978-3-642-00450-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00450-6 2009

  11. [11]

    Qualls,Lectures on Conformal Field Theory,1511.04074

    J.D. Qualls,Lectures on Conformal Field Theory,1511.04074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

    M. Gillioz,Conformal field theory for particle physicists, SpringerBriefs in Physics, Springer (2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4, [2207.09474]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27086-4 2023

  13. [13]

    Chester,Weizmann lectures on the numerical conformal bootstrap,Phys

    S.M. Chester,Weizmann lectures on the numerical conformal bootstrap,Phys. Rept. 1045(2023) 1 [1907.05147]. 159

    arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Simmons-Duffin,The Conformal Bootstrap, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp

    D. Simmons-Duffin,The Conformal Bootstrap, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 1–74, 2017, DOI [1602.07982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Sachdev,Quantum magnetism and criticality,Nature Phys.4(2008) 173 [0711.3015]

    S. Sachdev,Quantum magnetism and criticality,Nature Phys.4(2008) 173 [0711.3015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Schollwoeck,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,Annals Phys.326(2011) 96 [1008.3477]

    U. Schollwoeck,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,Annals Phys.326(2011) 96 [1008.3477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Pelissetto and E

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari,Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory,Phys. Rept.368(2002) 549 [cond-mat/0012164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Hellerman, D

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert and M. Watanabe,On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,JHEP12(2015) 071 [1505.01537]

    arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Monin, D

    A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi and F.K. Seibold,Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data,JHEP06(2017) 011 [1611.02912]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    ´Alvarez Gaum´ e, D

    L. ´Alvarez Gaum´ e, D. Orlando and S. Reffert,Selected Topics in the Large Quantum Number Expansion,Phys. Rept.933(2021) 1 [2008.03308]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Cardy,Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling,J

    J.L. Cardy,Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling,J. Phys. A17 (1984) L385

    1984

  22. [22]

    Simmons-Duffin,Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,JHEP04(2014) 146 [1204.3894]

    D. Simmons-Duffin,Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,JHEP04(2014) 146 [1204.3894]

    arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Bill` o, V

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri,Defects in conformal field theory, JHEP04(2016) 091 [1601.02883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin,Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks,JHEP02(2018) 081 [1706.07813]

    arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin,Counting Conformal Correlators,JHEP02(2018) 096 [1612.08987]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Rychkov and Z.M

    S. Rychkov and Z.M. Tan,Theϵ-expansion from conformal field theory,J. Phys. A48 (2015) 29FT01 [1505.00963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Hogervorst,RG flows onS d and Hamiltonian truncation,1811.00528

    M. Hogervorst,RG flows onS d and Hamiltonian truncation,1811.00528

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Anand, E

    N. Anand, E. Katz, Z.U. Khandker and M.T. Walters,Nonperturbative dynamics of (2+1)dϕ 4-theory from Hamiltonian truncation,JHEP05(2021) 190 [2010.09730]

    arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Caron-Huot,Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,JHEP09(2017) 078 [1703.00278]

    S. Caron-Huot,Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,JHEP09(2017) 078 [1703.00278]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Deser and A

    S. Deser and A. Schwimmer,Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 279 [hep-th/9302047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  31. [31]

    Van Raamsdonk,Lectures on gravity and entanglement., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Lectures on gravity and entanglement., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 297–351, 2017, DOI [1609.00026]. 160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Gaiotto,Boundary F-maximization,1403.8052

    D. Gaiotto,Boundary F-maximization,1403.8052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Hogervorst,Dimensional Reduction for Conformal Blocks,JHEP09(2016) 017 [1604.08913]

    M. Hogervorst,Dimensional Reduction for Conformal Blocks,JHEP09(2016) 017 [1604.08913]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Badel, G

    G. Badel, G. Cuomo, A. Monin and R. Rattazzi,The Epsilon Expansion Meets Semiclassics,JHEP11(2019) 110 [1909.01269]

    arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J.S. Hofmann and Y.-C. He,Uncovering Conformal Symmetry in the 3D Ising Transition: State-Operator Correspondence from a Quantum Fuzzy Sphere Regularization,Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 021009 [2210.13482]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    W. Guo, Z. Zhou, T.-C. Wei and Y.-C. He,TheO(N)Free-Scalar and Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theories on the Fuzzy Sphere,2512.02234

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Brower, G.T

    R.C. Brower, G.T. Fleming and H. Neuberger,Radial Quantization for Conformal Field Theories on the Lattice,PoSLATTICE2012(2012) 061 [1212.1757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Brower, M

    R.C. Brower, M. Cheng and G.T. Fleming,Improved Lattice Radial Quantization,PoS LATTICE2013(2014) 335 [1407.7597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Brower, G.T

    R.C. Brower, G.T. Fleming, A.D. Gasbarro, D. Howarth, T.G. Raben, C.-I. Tan et al., Radial lattice quantization of 3Dϕ4 field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 094502 [2006.15636]

    arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Ayyar, R.C

    V. Ayyar, R.C. Brower, G.T. Fleming, A.-M.E. Gl¨ uck, E.K. Owen, T.G. Raben et al., Operator product expansion for radial lattice quantization of 3Dϕ4 theory,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 114518 [2311.01100]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Hasenbusch,Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional Ising universality class,Phys

    M. Hasenbusch,Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional Ising universality class,Phys. Rev. B82(2010) 174433 [1004.4486]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Giombi and V

    S. Giombi and V. Kirilin,Anomalous dimensions in CFT with weakly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP11(2016) 068 [1601.01310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Nii,Classical equation of motion and Anomalous dimensions at leading order,JHEP 07(2016) 107 [1605.08868]

    K. Nii,Classical equation of motion and Anomalous dimensions at leading order,JHEP 07(2016) 107 [1605.08868]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Giombi, V

    S. Giombi, V. Gurucharan, V. Kirilin, S. Prakash and E. Skvortsov,On the Higher-Spin Spectrum in Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models,JHEP01(2017) 058 [1610.08472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Codello, M

    A. Codello, M. Safari, G.P. Vacca and O. Zanusso,Leading CFT constraints on multi-critical models in d>2,JHEP04(2017) 127 [1703.04830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Kaviraj, K

    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha,Analytic bootstrap at large spin,JHEP11(2015) 083 [1502.01437]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Goldberg,Breakdown of perturbation theory at tree level in theories with scalars, Phys

    H. Goldberg,Breakdown of perturbation theory at tree level in theories with scalars, Phys. Lett. B246(1990) 445

    1990

  48. [48]

    Wilson and M.E

    K.G. Wilson and M.E. Fisher,Critical exponents in 3.99 dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28(1972) 240. 161

    1972

  49. [49]

    Henriksson,The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,Phys

    J. Henriksson,The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data,Phys. Rept.1002 (2023) 1 [2201.09520]

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Albayrak, D

    S. Albayrak, D. Meltzer and D. Poland,More Analytic Bootstrap: Nonperturbative Effects and Fermions,JHEP08(2019) 040 [1904.00032]

    arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Henriksson and M

    J. Henriksson and M. Van Loon,Critical O(N) model to orderϵ 4 from analytic bootstrap, J. Phys. A52(2019) 025401 [1801.03512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Henriksson, F

    J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S.R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,Multiloop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs,Phys. Lett. B874(2026) 140235 [2507.12518]

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Henriksson, S.R

    J. Henriksson, S.R. Kousvos and J. Roosmale Nepveu,EFT meets CFT: multiloop renormalization of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ 4 theories,JHEP05(2026) 005 [2511.16740]

    arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Schnetz,ϕ4 theory at seven loops,Phys

    O. Schnetz,ϕ4 theory at seven loops,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 036002 [2212.03663]

    arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Kompaniets and E

    M.V. Kompaniets and E. Panzer,Minimally subtracted six loop renormalization of O(n)-symmetricϕ 4 theory and critical exponents,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 036016 [1705.06483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Brust and K

    C. Brust and K. Hinterbichler,Free□ k scalar conformal field theory,JHEP02(2017) 066 [1607.07439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Giombi, I.R

    S. Giombi, I.R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky,Bosonic tensor models at largeNand smallϵ,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 106014 [1707.03866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Cuomo, L

    G. Cuomo, L. Rastelli and A. Sharon,Moduli spaces in CFT: large charge operators, JHEP09(2024) 185 [2406.19441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model atQ >4,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 050 [1808.04380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Gurau,Notes on tensor models and tensor field theories,Ann

    R.G. Gurau,Notes on tensor models and tensor field theories,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.9(2022) 159 [1907.03531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Klebanov and G

    I.R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky,Uncolored random tensors, melon diagrams, and the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 046004 [1611.08915]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey and D. Lettera,The F-theorem in the melonic limit,JHEP02(2022) 147 [2111.11792]

    arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    El-Showk, M.F

    S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents,J. Stat. Phys.157(2014) 869 [1403.4545]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Liendo, L

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees,The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFT d, JHEP07(2013) 113 [1210.4258]. 162

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi,Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago,JHEP11(2015) 106 [1504.07997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    El-Showk, M

    S. El-Showk, M. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Conformal Field Theories in Fractional Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 141601 [1309.5089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Simmons-Duffin,A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP 06(2015) 174 [1502.02033]

    D. Simmons-Duffin,A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP 06(2015) 174 [1502.02033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Rong and N

    J. Rong and N. Su,Bootstrapping the minimalN= 1 superconformal field theory in three dimensions,JHEP06(2021) 154 [1807.04434]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Chester and S.S

    S.M. Chester and S.S. Pufu,Towards bootstrapping QED 3,JHEP08(2016) 019 [1601.03476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    F. Kos, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin,Bootstrapping theO(N)vector models, JHEP06(2014) 091 [1307.6856]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Gutzwiller,Periodic orbits and classical quantization conditions,J

    M.C. Gutzwiller,Periodic orbits and classical quantization conditions,J. Math. Phys.12 (1971) 343

    1971

  72. [72]

    Alvarez-Gaume, O

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, O. Loukas, D. Orlando and S. Reffert,Compensating strong coupling with large charge,JHEP04(2017) 059 [1610.04495]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Loukas,Abelian scalar theory at large global charge,Fortsch

    O. Loukas,Abelian scalar theory at large global charge,Fortsch. Phys.65(2017) 1700028 [1612.08985]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Loukas, D

    O. Loukas, D. Orlando and S. Reffert,Matrix models at large charge,JHEP10(2017) 085 [1707.00710]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Hellerman and S

    S. Hellerman and S. Maeda,On the LargeR-charge Expansion inN= 2Superconformal Field Theories,JHEP12(2017) 135 [1710.07336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Dondi, I

    N. Dondi, I. Kalogerakis, D. Orlando and S. Reffert,Resurgence of the large-charge expansion,JHEP05(2021) 035 [2102.12488]

    arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Dunne,Functional determinants in quantum field theory,J

    G.V. Dunne,Functional determinants in quantum field theory,J. Phys. A41(2008) 304006 [0711.1178]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Dashen, B

    R.F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu,Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory 1. Semiclassical Functional Methods,Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 4114

    1974

  79. [79]

    Simmons-Duffin,The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, JHEP03(2017) 086 [1612.08471]

    D. Simmons-Duffin,The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, JHEP03(2017) 086 [1612.08471]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Rattazzi, V.S

    R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi,Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,JHEP12(2008) 031 [0807.0004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.