pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11359 · v1 · pith:B4G2N354new · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Imprints of the Neutral Interstellar Medium on Polarized Synchrotron Emission and Faraday Rotation

Minjie Lei , S. E. Clark , Mehrnoosh Tahani , A. Bracco , Yik Ki Ma , Amit Seta , Jennifer West , E. Carretti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellar mediumneutral gassynchrotron emissionFaraday rotationHI structuredepolarizationGalactic magnetic fieldFaraday tomography
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutral gas regions in the ISM directly contribute to diffuse synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares multi-frequency polarized radio data with HI structures across the high-latitude sky. It reports stronger depolarization where HI shows multiple velocity components and finds that the first and second moments of Faraday depth spectra track neutral gas features. These patterns lead the authors to conclude that neutral-dominated ISM volumes can supply a sizable share of the observed signals. A sympathetic reader would care because this reframes how radio observations trace the Galactic magnetic field, requiring models to treat neutral gas as an active participant rather than a passive backdrop.

Core claim

Through analysis of polarized synchrotron emission from roughly 300 MHz to 23 GHz and comparison with HI complexity measures, the authors find enhanced depolarization in lines of sight with multiple HI velocity components and direct links between Faraday depth moments and neutral gas structure, indicating that regions dominated by neutral gas can directly contribute a significant portion of the diffuse synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation.

What carries the argument

HI structure complexity measures along the line of sight together with the first and second moments of Faraday depth spectra, used to establish correlations with depolarization and neutral gas features.

If this is right

  • Galactic magnetic field models must now incorporate contributions from neutral gas phases when synthesizing multiphase tracers.
  • Faraday tomography interpretations require accounting for neutral ISM effects to recover accurate 3D structures.
  • The diffuse synchrotron sky includes substantial emission originating from neutral-dominated regions.
  • New observational constraints apply to how magnetic fields interact with different gas phases across radio frequencies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If neutral gas contributes directly, prior attributions of Faraday rotation solely to ionized gas may need partial revision.
  • Extending the same HI-Faraday comparison to lower latitudes could test whether the neutral-gas imprint persists in denser environments.
  • Simulations of multiphase ISM with explicit neutral-gas synchrotron and rotation contributions could be compared against these observations to isolate the mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The correlations between HI complexity, depolarization, and Faraday depth moments reflect a direct physical contribution from neutral gas rather than indirect effects from magnetic field geometry or ionized gas properties.

What would settle it

A dataset or simulation in which neutral gas is isolated from ionized gas yet shows no corresponding change in depolarization or Faraday depth moments would falsify the direct-contribution claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11359 by A. Bracco, Amit Seta, E. Carretti, Jennifer West, Mehrnoosh Tahani, Minjie Lei, S. E. Clark, Yik Ki Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Frequency coverage of the polarized synchrotron emission surveys analyzed in this paper. sightline with n equal-column-density clouds will have Nc = n. Higher Nc is primarily driven by the pres￾ence of multiple intermediate velocity clouds along the LOS (Panopoulou & Lenz 2020), and displays a trend of higher complexity in the Northern hemisphere than the Southern hemisphere. 2.2. Polarized Dust Emission F… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the polarization fraction of dust emission from Planck data (left) and our cartoon model (right) vs. H I complexity from Panopoulou & Lenz (2020). The green line indicates the running median in equal sightline bins for each distribution. The cartoon model qualitatively reproduces the observed trend of decreasing polarized fraction with increasing H I complexity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 2D histogram of polarization emission from GHBN and GLBS surveys vs. H I complexity (Nc), compared to the dust p353 − Nc relationship. Similar to dust emission, polarized synchrotron data shows decreasing polarized emission with increasing H I complexity for both the northern and southern sky footprints. The 90th percentile Nc value is 2.25 for the northern footprint, and only 1.65 for the southern footpri… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relative depolarization between H I simple and complex sightlines as measured by the depolarization ratio D defined in Equation 12, across synchrotron and dust frequencies, over northern (left panel) and southern (right panel) footprints. Total synchrotron intensity I is treated as the confounding variable when pairing low and high complexity sightline. The depolarization ratios for contrasting LOS complex… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the relative depolarization ratio of the GMIMS-LBS (300−480 MHz) and GMIMS-HBS (1328 − 1768 MHz) datasets, when defining LOS complexity using different H I cloud velocity bounds. While relative de￾polarization decreases significantly for high frequency data when H I complexity is confined to a smaller velocity range and thus a smaller portion of the sightline, it remains con￾sistent for … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematics showing different synchrotron emission+Faraday rotation scenarios and their corresponding Faraday spectra and rotation measure ratio. (A): Classic Burn slab with uniform diffuse emission and rotation (R = 2); (B): Rotation entirely foreground to the dominant synchrotron emission contribution (R = 1). (C) Sightline dominated by a single nearby emitting+rotating dense cloud (R > 2); (D): Sightline… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Histogram of extragalactic to diffuse RM ratio in regions of low (10th percentile) vs. high (90th percentile) LOS H I complexity for GMIMS survey footprints. The black and red dashed line indicates RM ratio of 1 and 2 respectively. Compared to high complexity regions, the RM ratio distribution of the low complexity regions is consistently shifted to larger amplitudes across the northern (left) and southern… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Histogram of the absolute value of the rotation measure distribution in regions of low (10th percentile) vs. high (90th percentile) H I column density over different dataset footprints. The GHBN (left) and GHBS (middle) first moments results are compared the full sky result (right) using the Galactic rotation measure model from Hutschenreuter et al. (2022). Regions of higher H I column density show consist… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized histogram of the second Faraday moment M2 for the GHBS and LBS datasets in low LOS H I complexity (10th percentile Nc) and high complexity (90th percentile Nc) regions. The M2 distribution shifts to higher values in high H I complexity regions. The effect is more apparent for the low-frequency dataset, which has much better Faraday depth resolution. However, there is a caveat to this interpretat… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Randomly selected samples of GMIMS-HBS Faraday spectra (−100 rad m−2 < ϕ < 100 rad m−2 ) and H I4PI H I spectra (−120 km/s < v < 120 km/s) in regions of low (10th percentile, left) versus high (90th percentile, right) LOS H I complexity. The spectra are normalized to have zero mean and unit standard derivation, and shifted to center at their intensity weighted mean. The Faraday spectra in H I complex regi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interstellar medium (ISM) is a complex, multiphase medium, where disentangling the distribution of gas and magnetic field structure across different phases remains a considerable challenge. Recently, Faraday tomography enabled by broadband polarized radio observations has emerged as a promising probe of 3D ISM gas and magnetic field structures. However, the interpretation of these observations is obscured by our limited understanding of the different ISM components probed by the distinct Faraday depth features. In this work, we present a comprehensive multi-frequency ($\sim$300 MHz - 23 GHz) analysis comparing features in the Faraday-rotated, polarized synchrotron emission and HI structures over the full high-latitude (|b|>30 degrees) diffuse sky. Using measures of HI structure complexity along the line of sight (LOS), we observe enhanced depolarization across synchrotron radio frequencies in regions with high HI complexity characterized by multiple HI velocity components. We also find that the first and second moments of the Faraday depth spectra are linked to the underlying neutral gas structure. These results indicate that regions of the ISM that are dominated by neutral gas could directly contribute a significant portion of the diffuse synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation. These findings establish new observational constraints for Galactic magnetic field models that synthesize multiphase tracers into a single coherent picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs a multi-frequency (~300 MHz–23 GHz) analysis of polarized synchrotron emission over the high-latitude (|b|>30°) diffuse sky and compares it to HI structure complexity measures. It reports enhanced depolarization at synchrotron frequencies in sightlines with high HI complexity (multiple velocity components) and correlations between the first and second moments of Faraday depth spectra and neutral-gas structure, concluding that neutral-dominated ISM regions could directly contribute a significant fraction of the diffuse synchrotron emissivity and Faraday rotation.

Significance. If the reported correlations reflect a direct physical contribution from neutral gas rather than indirect covariance, the results would supply useful observational constraints for Galactic magnetic-field models that incorporate multiphase ISM tracers. The work demonstrates the utility of broadband Faraday tomography for linking 3D gas and magnetic-field structures across phases.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Discussion] The central claim that neutral-gas-dominated regions directly contribute to synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation rests on the observed correlations between HI complexity and depolarization/Faraday moments. However, the manuscript provides no quantitative discriminator (e.g., partial-correlation analysis controlling for Hα or dust tracers, or explicit modeling of magnetic-field geometry as a common driver) to rule out indirect covariance. This leaves the inference from correlation to direct contribution under-constrained (see Abstract and Discussion).
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] The abstract and methods sections should include explicit statements on statistical controls, error propagation, and exclusion criteria used for the reported correlations to allow independent verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review. We respond to the single major comment below, acknowledging where the manuscript can be strengthened while defending the correlative evidence presented.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Discussion] The central claim that neutral-gas-dominated regions directly contribute to synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation rests on the observed correlations between HI complexity and depolarization/Faraday moments. However, the manuscript provides no quantitative discriminator (e.g., partial-correlation analysis controlling for Hα or dust tracers, or explicit modeling of magnetic-field geometry as a common driver) to rule out indirect covariance. This leaves the inference from correlation to direct contribution under-constrained (see Abstract and Discussion).

    Authors: The referee is correct that the manuscript does not perform partial-correlation analyses or explicit modeling to isolate direct contributions from possible indirect covariance with other tracers. The reported correlations are specifically with HI velocity-component complexity rather than generic column-density or dust measures, which we argue provides targeted support for a neutral-phase link, but this does not fully exclude common drivers such as magnetic-field geometry. The abstract and discussion employ cautious language (“could directly contribute” and “indicate”) precisely to reflect the correlative basis. In revision we will expand the Discussion to explicitly note the possibility of indirect covariance and to state that partial-correlation tests with Hα or dust tracers represent a valuable future extension. This constitutes a partial revision focused on added caveats rather than new quantitative analysis. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational correlations presented as direct empirical results

full rationale

The paper reports direct multi-frequency comparisons of HI complexity measures with depolarization and Faraday depth moments over the high-latitude sky. These are presented as observed correlations without any derivation chain, fitted parameters relabeled as predictions, self-definitional quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The interpretation that neutral gas may contribute to synchrotron and Faraday rotation is an inference from the correlations, not a result forced by the paper's own inputs or equations. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no steps that reduce by construction to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, background axioms, or invented entities used in the analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5780 in / 1000 out tokens · 18849 ms · 2026-06-27T12:13:23.884933+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Alves, M. I. R., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833885

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833885 2020

  2. [2]

    J., Livingston, J

    Alger, M. J., Livingston, J. D., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e022, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.10

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.10 2021

  3. [3]

    V olume 5: Galactic Structure and Stellar Populations, ed

    Beck, R., & Wielebinski, R. 2013, in Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 5: Galactic Structure and Stellar Populations, ed. T. D. Oswalt & G. Gilmore, Vol. 5, 641, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5612-0 13 Ben Bekhti, N., Fl¨ oer, L., Keller, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5612-0 2013

  4. [4]

    L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208...20B 208, 20

    Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 20, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 2013

  5. [5]

    2026, A&A, 708, A245, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557351

    Berat, J., Miville-Deschˆ enes, M.-A., Bracco, A., Hennebelle, P., & Scholtys, J. 2026, A&A, 708, A245, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557351

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557351 2026

  6. [6]

    A., Ordog, A., Brown, J.-A., et al

    Booth, R. A., Ordog, A., Brown, J.-A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 304, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae28d1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae28d1 2026

  7. [7]

    B., et al

    Boulanger, F., Gry, C., Jenkins, E. B., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348953

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348953 2024

  8. [8]

    1988, ApJ, 330, 964, doi: 10.1086/166526

    Boulanger, F., & Perault, M. 1988, ApJ, 330, 964, doi: 10.1086/166526

    work page doi:10.1086/166526 1988

  9. [9]

    2020, A&A, 644, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039283

    Bracco, A., Jeli´ c, V., Marchal, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 644, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039283

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039283 2020

  10. [10]

    A., & de Bruyn, A

    Brentjens, M. A., & de Bruyn, A. G. 2005, A&A, 441, 1217, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052990

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 2005

  11. [11]

    Burn, B. J. 1966, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 133, 67, doi: 10.1093/mnras/133.1.67

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/133.1.67 1966

  12. [12]

    L., Clark, S

    Campbell, J. L., Clark, S. E., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac400d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac400d 2022

  13. [13]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 2330, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz806

    Carretti, E., Haverkorn, M., Staveley-Smith, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 2330, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz806

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz806 2019

  14. [14]

    Clark, S. E. 2018, ApJL, 857, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabb54

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aabb54 2018

  15. [15]

    E., & Hensley, B

    Clark, S. E., & Hensley, B. S. 2019, ApJ, 887, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5803

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5803 2019

  16. [16]

    T., Akahori, T., et al

    Cooray, S., Takeuchi, T. T., Akahori, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 5129, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3580

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3580 2021

  17. [17]

    1989, ApJ, 342, 785, doi: 10.1086/167636

    Danly, L. 1989, ApJ, 342, 785, doi: 10.1086/167636

    work page doi:10.1086/167636 1989

  18. [18]

    M., Landecker, T

    Dickey, J. M., Landecker, T. L., Thomson, A. J. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85f 2019

  19. [19]

    M., West, J., Thomson, A

    Dickey, J. M., West, J., Thomson, A. J. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac94ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac94ce 2022

  20. [20]

    2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 2024

  21. [21]

    2024, A&A, 687, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348586 —

    Erceg, A., Jeli´ c, V., Haverkorn, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348586 —. 2022, A&A, 663, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142244 G´ orski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348586 2024

  22. [22]

    E., & Tahani, M

    Halal, G., Clark, S. E., & Tahani, M. 2024, ApJ, 973, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e0 2024

  23. [23]

    2015, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    Haverkorn, M. 2015, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    2015

  24. [24]

    407, Magnetic Fields in Diffuse Media, ed

    Library, Vol. 407, Magnetic Fields in Diffuse Media, ed. A. Lazarian, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, & C. Melioli, 483, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44625-6 17

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44625-6

  25. [25]

    2019, Galaxies, 7, 26, doi: 10.3390/galaxies7010026

    Haverkorn, M., Machida, M., & Akahori, T. 2019, Galaxies, 7, 26, doi: 10.3390/galaxies7010026

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies7010026 2019

  26. [26]

    2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Heald, G. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 259, Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies, ed. K. G. Strassmeier, A. G. Kosovichev, & J. E. Beckman (Cambridge University Press), 591–598

    2009

  27. [27]

    S., Murray, C

    Hensley, B. S., Murray, C. E., & Dodici, M. 2022, ApJ, 929, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cbd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cbd 2022

  28. [28]

    Hill, A. S. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 129, doi: 10.3390/galaxies6040129

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies6040129 2018

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Hutschenreuter, S., Anderson, C. S., Betti, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140486 Jeli´ c, V., Prelogovi´ c, D., Haverkorn, M., Remeijn, J., & Klindˇ zi´ c, D. 2018, A&A, 615, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833291

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140486 2022

  30. [30]

    Kalberla, P. M. W., & Kerp, J. 2016, A&A, 595, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629113

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629113 2016

  31. [31]

    Kalberla, P. M. W., Kerp, J., Haud, U., & Haverkorn, M. 2017, A&A, 607, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629627

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629627 2017

  32. [32]

    Lei, M., & Clark, S. E. 2024, ApJ, 972, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ade

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ade 2024

  33. [33]

    S., & Dor´ e, O

    Lenz, D., Hensley, B. S., & Dor´ e, O. 2017, ApJ, 846, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa84af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa84af 2017

  34. [34]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e

    Martin-Alvarez, S., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Dacunha, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e 2024

  35. [35]

    M., Stanimirovi´ c, S., & Rybarczyk, D

    McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Stanimirovi´ c, S., & Rybarczyk, D. R. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 19, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-104851

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-104851 2023

  36. [36]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 2739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2862 16

    Takahashi, K. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2862 16

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2862 2019

  37. [37]

    A., Van Eck, C

    Ordog, A., Booth, R. A., Van Eck, C. L., Brown, J.-A. C., & Landecker, T. L. 2019, Galaxies, 7, 43, doi: 10.3390/galaxies7020043

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies7020043 2019

  38. [38]

    V., & Lenz, D

    Panopoulou, G. V., & Lenz, D. 2020, ApJ, 902, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb6f5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb6f5 2020

  39. [39]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    Pattle, K., Fissel, L., Tahani, M., Liu, T., & Ntormousi, E. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference

    2023

  40. [40]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 193, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.11179

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11179

  41. [41]

    Peek, J. E. G., & Clark, S. E. 2019, ApJL, 886, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab53de

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab53de 2019

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Pelgrims, V., Mandarakas, N., Skalidis, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A162, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349015 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833885

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349015 2024

  43. [43]

    2014, MNRAS, 439, 4048, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu270

    Plaszczynski, S., Montier, L., Levrier, F., & Tristram, M. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 4048, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu270

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu270 2014

  44. [44]

    B., Panopoulou, G

    Ponnada, S. B., Panopoulou, G. V., Butsky, I. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11707, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3978

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3978 2024

  45. [45]

    Gaensler, B. M. 2020, RM-Tools: Rotation measure (RM) synthesis and Stokes QU-fitting, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2005.003

    2020

  46. [46]

    2025, A&A, 695, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449556

    Raycheva, N., Haverkorn, M., Ideguchi, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449556

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449556 2025

  47. [47]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., Greenfield, P., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Rubi˜ no-Mart´ ın, J. A., Guidi, F., G´ enova-Santos, R. T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3383, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3439

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  48. [48]

    Stuart, E. A. 2010, Statistical Science, 25, 1, doi: 10.1214/09-sts313

    work page doi:10.1214/09-sts313 2010

  49. [49]

    2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 694, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453326

    Sun, X., Haverkorn, M., Carretti, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453326

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453326 2025

  50. [50]

    H., Rudnick, L., Akahori, T., et al

    Sun, X. H., Rudnick, L., Akahori, T., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/60

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/60 2015

  51. [51]

    2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting

    Tahani, M., Hollberg, L., Lokhorst, D., Kim, J., & Team, D. 2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting

    2026

  52. [52]

    C., & Kainulainen, J

    Tahani, M., Plume, R., Brown, J. C., & Kainulainen, J. 2018, A&A, 614, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732219

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732219 2018

  53. [53]

    PASIPHAE: A high-Galactic-latitude, high-accuracy optopolarimetric survey

    Tassis, K., Ramaprakash, A. N., Readhead, A. C. S., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.05652, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.05652

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.05652 2018

  54. [54]

    C., Reich, P., & Reich, W

    Testori, J. C., Reich, P., & Reich, W. 2008, A&A, 484, 733, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078842

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078842 2008

  55. [55]

    L., Gray, A

    Uyaniker, B., Landecker, T. L., Gray, A. D., & Kothes, R. 2003, ApJ, 585, 785, doi: 10.1086/346234 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 Van Eck, C. L. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 112, doi: 10.3390/galaxies6040112 Van Eck, C. L., Haverkorn, M., Alves, M. I. R., et al. 2017, A...

    work page doi:10.1086/346234 2003

  56. [56]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  57. [57]

    Y., Sallmen, S., & Lallement, R

    Welsh, B. Y., Sallmen, S., & Lallement, R. 2004, A&A, 414, 261, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034367

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034367 2004

  58. [58]

    2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7201, doi: 10.21105/joss.07201

    Wenger, T. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 7201, doi: 10.21105/joss.07201

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07201 2024

  59. [59]

    L., Reich, W., & Wielebinski, R

    Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Reich, W., & Wielebinski, R. 2006, A&A, 448, 411, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053851

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053851 2006

  60. [60]

    L., Carretti, E., et al

    Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Carretti, E., et al. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 259, 89–90, doi: 10.1017/S1743921309030117

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921309030117 2009

  61. [61]

    L., Carretti, E., et al

    Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Carretti, E., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab22b0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab22b0 2019

  62. [62]

    L., Douglas, K

    Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Douglas, K. A., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf7c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf7c1 2021

  63. [63]

    G., et al

    Zaroubi, S., Jelic, V., de Bruyn, A. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, L46, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv123

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv123 2015

  64. [64]

    M., & Rix, H.-W

    Zhang, X., Green, G. M., & Rix, H.-W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1855, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1941

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1941 2023