pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11404 · v1 · pith:NHUZ5ITCnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.GA

Numerical Simulations of Hypervelocity Micrometeoroid Impacts: Rocky Impactors onto Icy Targets and the Role of Porosity

Ryuki Hyodo , Shigeru Wakita , Brandon C. Johnson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GA
keywords hypervelocity impactsmicrometeoroidsicy targetsporosityvaporizationnumerical simulationsexogenic materialcrater formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rocky micrometeoroids striking icy targets at 30 km/s are efficiently vaporized regardless of porosity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs three-dimensional simulations of oblique hypervelocity impacts to track what happens to rocky impactor material when it hits icy targets. It establishes that strong heating always leads to efficient vaporization of the impactor, but the peak pressure and temperature inside the impactor change by nearly an order of magnitude across different porosity combinations. This distinction matters because the vaporized exogenic material can then follow different paths of condensation or chemical change depending on those conditions. The results apply directly to processes that modify surfaces in systems like Saturn's rings.

Core claim

At an impact velocity of 30 km/s, the impactor material is strongly heated and is efficiently vaporized regardless of the porosities of the impactor and target. However, the peak pressure and peak temperature experienced by the impactor vary by nearly an order of magnitude.

What carries the argument

Three-dimensional iSALE hydrocode simulations that follow the thermodynamic states of the rocky impactor for end-member porosity pairs (0% and 90%) at 45-degree impact angle.

If this is right

  • Early crater shapes shift from deep narrow channels when the target is porous to shallow vapor-driven blowoff when the impactor is porous.
  • The vaporized impactor material can follow different condensation and chemical pathways depending on the porosity-controlled peak conditions.
  • Exogenic non-icy material delivered to icy surfaces is fully vaporized at Saturn-ring speeds.
  • The same vaporization outcome holds across a range of planetary systems that experience comparable hypervelocity impacts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Porosity-dependent peak conditions could produce measurable differences in the final surface composition or mixing depth of delivered material.
  • Models of long-term ring or satellite surface evolution may need separate treatment of vapor states for high- versus low-porosity cases.
  • Lower-speed experiments could check whether the efficient vaporization result persists below 30 km/s.

Load-bearing premise

The material models inside the simulation code correctly reproduce the real heating, vaporization, and pressure evolution of porous rock and ice under these impact speeds.

What would settle it

A laboratory experiment or in-situ measurement showing that the impactor material remains mostly solid or that peak temperatures stay within a narrow range across the same porosity combinations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11404 by Brandon C. Johnson, Ryuki Hyodo, Shigeru Wakita.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Snapshots from iSALE-3D simulations for different combinations of target and impactor porosities, shown for 𝑣imp = 30 km s−1 , 𝜃 = 45◦ , 𝑟imp = 10 𝜇m, and 20 CPPR. Colors indicate temperature. channel (Appendix C). Therefore, the observed high temperature of the impactor material in this scenario is likely due to thermal heat exchange between the impactor and the surrounding target-derived hot vapor, rathe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cumulative fraction of the peak temperature (left) and peak pressure (right) for different combinations of impactor and target porosities. Here, target material is not included because the impactor material is the focus of this study. The impact velocity is 30 km s−1 and the impact angle is 45◦ . Although the peak pressure and temperature vary by nearly an order of magnitude depending on porosity, the impa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spatial distributions of peak temperature (𝑇peak , left column) and peak pressure (𝑃peak , right column) mapped onto the initial (𝑡 = 0) particle positions in the 𝑦 ≈ 0 cross-section (𝑥–𝑧 plane). Each row corresponds to a different combination of impactor and target porosity: 𝜙imp = 0%, 𝜙tar = 0% (first row); 𝜙imp = 0%, 𝜙tar = 90% (second row); 𝜙imp = 90%, 𝜙tar = 0% (third row); and 𝜙imp = 90%, 𝜙tar = 90% … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Semi-analytical predictions of the peak shock pressure and post-shock temperature as a function of the target and impactor porosities. Left: peak pressure 𝑃peak at the interface, which is identical for the target and impactor under the impedance-matching condition. Middle: peak temperature of the impactor material, 𝑇peak,imp. Right: peak temperature of the target material, 𝑇peak,tar. Here we consider a ref… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the outer Solar System, for example in the Saturnian system, a planet's strong gravity attracts micrometeoroids and generates hypervelocity impacts on bodies such as rings and satellites. Micrometeoroids are seemingly non-icy, whereas the targets are typically icy, and both the impactor and the target may span a wide range of porosities. In this study, we perform three-dimensional iSALE simulations of hypervelocity impacts of rocky impactors onto icy targets, varying the impact angle and the porosities of the impactor and target ($\phi_{\rm imp}$ and $\phi_{\rm tar}$). We consider two end-member porosities (0% and 90%) for oblique ($45^\circ$) impacts. At an impact velocity of 30 km/s, characteristic of Saturn's rings, we find that the morphology of early-stage crater formation varies significantly with porosity, transitioning from deep-penetration, narrow-channel cavities ($\phi_{\rm imp}=0$, $\phi_{\rm tar}=90%$) to very shallow craters driven by near-surface vapor blowoff ($\phi_{\rm imp}=90%$, $\phi_{\rm tar}=0%$), with intermediate, more hemispherical cavity shapes when the porosities are comparable. Here, we focus on the thermodynamic fate of the impactor, which represents the exogenic material responsible for modifying the target surface. The impactor material is strongly heated and is efficiently vaporized regardless of the porosities of the impactor and target. However, the peak pressure and peak temperature experienced by the impactor vary by nearly an order of magnitude. These results imply that hypervelocity impacts occurring, for example, in Saturn's rings efficiently vaporize exogenic non-icy impactors upon impact, while the subsequent thermodynamic pathways $-$ such as condensation and chemical evolution $-$ may differ depending on the thermodynamic conditions. Our results are expected to be applicable to a variety of planetary systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents three-dimensional iSALE hydrocode simulations of 30 km/s hypervelocity impacts of rocky micrometeoroids onto icy targets at 45° incidence, varying impactor and target porosities between the end-member values of 0% and 90%. The central claims are that crater morphology depends strongly on the porosity combination (narrow deep channels for low-impactor/high-target porosity; shallow vapor-driven craters for the reverse) while the impactor material is nevertheless strongly heated and efficiently vaporized in all cases, although peak pressures and temperatures experienced by the impactor differ by nearly an order of magnitude.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work would demonstrate that exogenic rocky material delivered to icy surfaces in the outer Solar System (e.g., Saturn’s rings) is efficiently vaporized upon impact, with the subsequent condensation and chemical pathways potentially sensitive to the porosity-dependent thermodynamic histories. The explicit exploration of porosity end-members and the focus on the thermodynamic fate of the impactor rather than only morphology constitute a useful addition to the literature on micrometeoroid processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: the assertion that the impactor is 'efficiently vaporized regardless of the porosities' is load-bearing for the central claim yet is presented without quantitative vaporized mass fractions, time-integrated vapor fractions, or direct comparison to impedance-match calculations. The reported order-of-magnitude spread in peak pressure and temperature already indicates strong sensitivity; without explicit metrics it is unclear whether vaporization remains 'efficient' in all four porosity combinations.
  2. [Methods] Methods: no grid-resolution study, convergence tests, or validation of the chosen porosity-compaction model (ε-α or equivalent) and ANEOS-style EOS against 30 km/s porous rock-ice experiments or analytic solutions is described. Because the thermodynamic partitioning into heating and phase change is the least secure link, these omissions directly affect in the vaporization conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by inclusion of at least one quantitative vaporization metric (e.g., percentage of impactor mass above the vapor dome at late times) for each porosity case.
  2. [Figures / Methods] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the spatial resolution (cells per impactor radius) and the porosity-compaction parameters employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the potential significance of our porosity end-member study. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the vaporization results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: the assertion that the impactor is 'efficiently vaporized regardless of the porosities' is load-bearing for the central claim yet is presented without quantitative vaporized mass fractions, time-integrated vapor fractions, or direct comparison to impedance-match calculations. The reported order-of-magnitude spread in peak pressure and temperature already indicates strong sensitivity; without explicit metrics it is unclear whether vaporization remains 'efficient' in all four porosity combinations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics would make the central claim more robust. In the revised manuscript we will add the mass fraction of impactor material exceeding the vaporization threshold (defined via the ANEOS tables) for each of the four porosity combinations, together with time-integrated vapor fractions extracted from the tracer particles. We will also include a direct comparison to one-dimensional impedance-match calculations for the non-porous end-member cases to contextualize the three-dimensional results. Although peak pressures and temperatures vary by nearly an order of magnitude, the simulations show that even the lowest values still drive the majority of the rocky impactor above the vaporization curve. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods: no grid-resolution study, convergence tests, or validation of the chosen porosity-compaction model (ε-α or equivalent) and ANEOS-style EOS against 30 km/s porous rock-ice experiments or analytic solutions is described. Because the thermodynamic partitioning into heating and phase change is the least secure link, these omissions directly affect in the vaporization conclusion.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated grid-resolution and convergence study to the Methods section, demonstrating that the reported vaporization fractions are insensitive to further refinement at the resolutions used. The ε-α compaction model is the standard iSALE implementation and has been validated against a range of laboratory data in the cited literature; we will expand the Methods text with those references. Direct 30 km/s porous rock-ice experiments do not exist in the published record, but we will add analytic impedance-match comparisons for the non-porous cases and a brief discussion of the ANEOS applicability limits at these velocities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: forward simulation outputs with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper reports direct results from 3D iSALE hydrocode runs at fixed 30 km/s velocity, with porosity as an explicit input parameter varied across end-member cases. Thermodynamic outcomes (heating, vaporization fractions, peak P/T) are computed quantities, not fitted parameters renamed as predictions, nor derived via self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled from prior author work. No equations or claims reduce by construction to the simulation setup itself; the central statements follow from the numerical integration under the chosen EOS and compaction models. This is the expected non-circular outcome for a pure forward-modeling study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study depends on the validity of the iSALE hydrocode for porous hypervelocity impacts and on the selection of 0% and 90% porosities plus 30 km/s velocity as representative end-members.

free parameters (2)
  • porosity values = 0% and 90%
    Selected as end-member cases (0% and 90%) to bracket possible behaviors
  • impact velocity = 30 km/s
    Chosen as characteristic value for Saturn's rings
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption iSALE hydrocode and associated material models correctly simulate the physics of hypervelocity impacts between porous rocky and icy materials
    All morphological and thermodynamic conclusions rest on this numerical tool being appropriate for the regime

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5905 in / 1235 out tokens · 32989 ms · 2026-06-27T11:22:03.617614+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    JournalofGeophysicalResearch(Planets)124,1044–1083

    Space Weathering Induced Via MicroparticleImpacts:1.ModelingofImpactVelocitiesandFluxofMicrometeoroidsFromCometary,Asteroidal,andInterstellarOrigininthe MainAsteroidBeltandtheNear-EarthEnvironment. JournalofGeophysicalResearch(Planets)124,1044–1083. doi:10.1029/2018JE005563. Babadzhanov, P.B., Kokhirova, G.I.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2018je005563

  2. [2]

    A&A 495, 353–358

    Densities and porosities of meteoroids. A&A 495, 353–358. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810460. Benz,W.,Cameron,A.G.W.,Melosh,H.J.,1989. TheoriginoftheMoonandthesingle-impacthypothesisIII. Icarus81,113–131. doi:10.1016/ 0019-1035(89)90129-2. Blum, J.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810460 1989

  3. [3]

    Advances in Physics 55, 881–947

    Dust agglomeration. Advances in Physics 55, 881–947. doi:10.1080/00018730601095039. Blum, J., Bischoff, D., Gundlach, B.,

    work page doi:10.1080/00018730601095039

  4. [4]

    Blum, J., Wurm, G.,

    doi:10.3390/universe8070381,arXiv:2207.12731. Blum, J., Wurm, G.,

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8070381

  5. [5]

    The growth mechanisms of macroscopic bodies in protoplanetary disks. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 21–56. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145152. Bray, V.J., Collins, G.S., Morgan, J.V., Melosh, H.J., Schenk, P.M.,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145152

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.12.009

    Hydrocode simulation of Ganymede and Europa cratering trends - How thick is Europa’s crust? Icarus 231, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.12.009. Brownlee, D., Tsou, P., Aléon, J., Alexander, C.M.O.D., Araki, T., Bajt, S., Baratta, G.A., Bastien, R., Bland, P., Bleuet, P., Borg, J., Bradley, J.P., Brearley,A.,Brenker,F.,Brennan,S.,Bridges,J.C.,Browning,N...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.12.009 2013

  7. [7]

    Carroll, M.M., Holt, A.C.,

    doi:10.1126/science.1135840. Carroll, M.M., Holt, A.C.,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1135840

  8. [8]

    Journal of Applied Physics 43, 1626–1636

    Static and Dynamic Pore-Collapse Relations for Ductile Porous Materials. Journal of Applied Physics 43, 1626–1636. doi:10.1063/1.1661372. Collins,G.,Melosh,H.,Wünnemann,K.,2011. Improvementstothe𝜖-𝛼porouscompactionmodelforsimulatingimpactsintohigh-porositysolar system objects. International Journal of Impact Engineering 38, 434–439. URL:https://www.scienc...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1661372 2011

  9. [9]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Planetary Impact Processes in Porous Materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 103–136. URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23002-9_4, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23002-9_4. Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., Ivanov, B.A.,

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23002-9_4

  10. [10]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, 217–231

    Modeling damage and deformation in impact simula- tions. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, 217–231. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x. Davison, T.M., Collins, G.S., Ciesla, F.J.,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x 1945

  11. [11]

    Icarus 208, 468–481

    Numerical modelling of heating in porous planetesimal collisions. Icarus 208, 468–481. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.034. Davison, T.M., Collins, G.S., Elbeshausen, D., Wünnemann, K., Kearsley, A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.034 2010

  12. [12]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 46, 1510–1524

    Numerical modeling of oblique hypervelocity impacts on strong ductile targets. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 46, 1510–1524. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01246.x. Elbeshausen,D.,Wünnemann,K.,2011. isale-3d:Athree-dimensional,multi-material,multi-rheologyhydrocodeanditsapplicationstolarge-scale geodynamic processes, in: Proceedings of 11th Hypervelocity I...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01246.x 1945

  13. [13]

    Icarus 204, 716–731

    Scaling of oblique impacts in frictional targets: Implications for crater size and formation mechanisms. Icarus 204, 716–731. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.018. Flynn, G.J., Moore, L.B., Klöck, W.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.018 2009

  14. [14]

    Icarus 142, 97–105

    Density and Porosity of Stone Meteorites: Implications for the Density, Porosity, Cratering, and Collisional Disruption of Asteroids. Icarus 142, 97–105. doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6210. Genge, M.J., Engrand, C., Gounelle, M., Taylor, S.,

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6210 1999

  15. [15]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, 497–515

    The classification of micrometeorites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, 497–515. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00668.x. Güttler, C., Mannel, T., Rotundi, A., Merouane, S., Fulle, M., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Lasue, J., Levasseur-Regourd, A.C., Blum, J., Naletto, G., Sierks, H., Hilchenbach, M., Tubiana, C., Capaccioni, F., Paquette, J.A., Flandes, A., Mor...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00668.x 1945

  16. [16]

    A&A 630, A24

    Synthesis of the morphological description of cometary dust at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. A&A 630, A24. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834751,arXiv:1902.10634. Hirt,C.W.,Amsden,A.A.,Cook,J.L.,1974. AnArbitraryLagrangian-EulerianComputingMethodforAllFlowSpeeds. JournalofComputational Physics 14, 227–253. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(74)90051-5. R.Hyodo et al.:Pre...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834751 1902

  17. [17]

    Hyodo, R., Genda, H.,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9897,arXiv:2006.00732. Hyodo, R., Genda, H.,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9897 2006

  18. [18]

    Abeysekara, et al., Measurement of the Crab Nebula Spectrum Past 100 TeV with HAWC, Astrophys

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ abf6d8,arXiv:2104.04981. Hyodo, R., Genda, H., Brasser, R.,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/

  19. [19]

    Icarus 354, 114064

    Modification of the composition and density of Mercury from late accretion. Icarus 354, 114064. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114064,arXiv:2008.08490. Hyodo, R., Genda, H., Madeira, G.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.114064 2020

  20. [20]

    Nature Geoscience 18, 44–49

    Pollution resistance of saturn’s ring particles during micrometeoroid impact. Nature Geoscience 18, 44–49. doi:10.1038/s41561-024-01598-9. Ivanov,B.,Deniem,D.,Neukum,G.,1997. Implementationofdynamicstrengthmodelsinto2dhydrocodes:Applicationsforatmosphericbreakup and impact cratering. International Journal of Impact Engineering 20, 411–430. URL:https://www...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41561-024-01598-9 1997

  21. [21]

    ScienceAdvances9,eadf8537

    Micrometeoroid infall onto saturn’s rings constrains their age to nomorethanafewhundredmillionyears. ScienceAdvances9,eadf8537. URL:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv. adf8537, doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf8537,arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adf8537. Kraus, R.G., Senft, L.E., Stewart, S.T.,

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv

  22. [22]

    Effects of friction and plastic deformation in shock-comminuted damaged rocks on impact heating

    Impacts onto h2o ice: Scaling laws for melting, vaporization, excavation, and final crater size. Icarus214,724–738. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103511001898,doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.05.016. Kurosawa,K.,Genda,H.,2018. EffectsofFrictionandPlasticDeformationinShock-ComminutedDamagedRocksonImpactHeating. Geophy...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.05.016 2011

  23. [23]

    Luo, X.Z., Zhu, M.H., Ding, M.,

    doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0496-3. Luo, X.Z., Zhu, M.H., Ding, M.,

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0496-3

  24. [24]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e2022JE007333

    Ejecta Pattern of Oblique Impacts on the Moon From Numerical Simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e2022JE007333. doi:10.1029/2022JE007333. Luther, R., Artemieva, N., Ivanova, M., Lorenz, C., Wünnemann, K.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2022je007333

  25. [25]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 52, 979–999

    Snow carrots after the Chelyabinsk event and model implications for highly porous solar system objects. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 52, 979–999. doi:10.1111/maps.12831. Manske, L., Wünnemann, K., Kurosawa, K.,

    work page doi:10.1111/maps.12831

  26. [26]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e2022JE007426

    Quantification of Impact-Induced Melt Production in Numerical Modeling Revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e2022JE007426. doi:10.1029/2022JE007426. Melosh, H.J.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2022je007426

  27. [27]

    Icarus 59, 234–260

    Impact ejection, spallation, and the origin of meteorites. Icarus 59, 234–260. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90026-5. MELOSH,H.J.,2007. Ahydrocodeequationofstateforsio2. Meteoritics&PlanetaryScience42,2079–2098. URL:https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x, arXiv:https:/...

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90026-5 2007

  28. [28]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 97, 14735–14759

    Dynamic fragmentation in impacts: Hydrocode simulation of laboratory impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 97, 14735–14759. URL:https:// agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/92JE01632, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/92JE01632, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/92JE01632. Okamoto, T., Nakamura, A.M., Hasegawa...

    work page doi:10.1029/92je01632

  29. [29]

    Icarus 224, 209–217

    Impact experiments of exotic dust grain capture by highly porous primitive bodies. Icarus 224, 209–217. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.023. Pierazzo, E., Vickery, A., Melosh, H.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.023 2013

  30. [30]

    Icarus 127, 408–423

    A reevaluation of impact melt production. Icarus 127, 408–423. URL:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103597957134, doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1997.5713. Pokorný, P., Sarantos, M., Janches, D.,

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5713 1997

  31. [31]

    Reconciling the dawn-dusk asymmetry in Mercury's exosphere with the micrometeoroid impact directionality

    Reconciling the Dawn-Dusk Asymmetry in Mercury’s Exosphere with the Micrometeoroid Impact Directionality. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 842, L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa775d,arXiv:1706.01461. Senft, L.E., Stewart, S.T.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa775d 2041

  32. [32]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, 497–515

    Impact crater formation in icy layered terrains on Mars. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 43, 1993–2013. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00657.x. Silber, E.A., Johnson, B.C.,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00657.x 1993

  33. [33]

    Impact crater morphology and the structure of Europa's ice shell

    Impact Crater Morphology and the Structure of Europa’s Ice Shell. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 122, 2685–2701. doi:10.1002/2017JE005456,arXiv:1711.08997. Stewart, S.T., Ahrens, T.J.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/2017je005456

  34. [34]

    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2008GL035947, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035947, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008GL035947

    URL:https://agupubs. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2008GL035947, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035947, arXiv:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008GL035947. Svetsov, V.V., Shuvalov, V.V.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2008gl035947

  35. [35]

    Planetary and Space Science 117, 444–452

    Water delivery to the Moon by asteroidal and cometary impacts. Planetary and Space Science 117, 444–452. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.011. Thompson, S.L., Lauson, H.S.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.011 2015

  36. [36]

    Geophysical Research Letters 46, 13,678–13,686

    Enhancement of Impact Heating in Pressure-Strengthened Rocks in Oblique Impacts. Geophysical Research Letters 46, 13,678–13,686. doi:10.1029/2019GL085174,arXiv:1912.00371. Wakita, S., Genda, H., Kurosawa, K., Davison, T.M., Johnson, B.C.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2019gl085174 1912

  37. [37]

    Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e07266

    Effect of Impact Velocity and Angle on Deformational Heating and Postimpact Temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets) 127, e07266. doi:10.1029/2022JE007266,arXiv:2208.07630. Wakita, S., Johnson, B.C., Denton, C.A., Davison, T.M.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2022je007266

  38. [38]

    Icarus 360, 114365

    Jetting during oblique impacts of spherical impactors. Icarus 360, 114365. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114365,arXiv:2102.02303. Wakita, S., Matsumoto, Y., Oshino, S., Hasegawa, Y.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114365 2021

  39. [39]

    Planetesimal collisions as a chondrule forming event

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/125,arXiv:1611.05511. Wünnemann, K., Collins, G., Melosh, H.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/125

  40. [40]

    Icarus 180, 514–527

    A strain-based porosity model for use in hydrocode simulations of impacts and implications for transient crater growth in porous targets. Icarus 180, 514–527. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0019103505004124, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.013. Zhang, Z., Hayes, A.G., Janssen, M.A., Nicholson, P.D., Cuzzi, J.N., de Pa...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.013 2005

  41. [41]

    Icarus 294, 14–42

    Exposure age of Saturn’s A and B rings, and the Cassini Division as suggested by their non-icy material content. Icarus 294, 14–42. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.04.008. R.Hyodo et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 21 of 21

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.04.008 2017