pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11534 · v1 · pith:L45YGH63new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph · cs.LG

Urban Heat MiniCubes: An AI-Ready dataset for urban heat research

Jonathan Starfeldt , Maria J. Molina , Alexander Kerr , Adam Yang , Thomas R.H. Holmes , Christopher R. Hain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph cs.LG
keywords urban heatsatellite datasetmachine learninggridded data cubesmulti-sensor dataLandsatSentinel-1GOES-R
0
0 comments X

The pith

Urban Heat MiniCubes supplies harmonized 90 by 90 km gridded data cubes for 48 cities to reduce preprocessing for machine learning on urban heat.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Urban Heat MiniCubes, a publicly available dataset of harmonized gridded data cubes covering 48 cities in the Western Hemisphere for 2022-2023. It reprojects and collocates multi-sensor observations from Landsat 8/9, Sentinel-1, GOES-R, and microwave products onto a common grid. The dataset combines higher-spatial-resolution lower-frequency data with higher-temporal-frequency coarser observations. This addresses the challenge that multi-sensor data for urban heat is rarely available in consistent form at needed scales. A sympathetic reader would care because the harmonization aims to let machine learning models work directly on the cubes without separate reprojection, resampling, or alignment steps.

Core claim

Urban Heat MiniCubes provides harmonized 90 x 90 km gridded data cubes for 48 cities with variables reprojected and collocated to a common grid to reduce preprocessing. The dataset includes two complementary modalities of higher-spatial-resolution lower-frequency observations from Landsat 8/9 and Sentinel-1 alongside higher-temporal-frequency coarser observations from GOES-R and a microwave land surface temperature product, with documentation, inter-variable analyses, and autoencoder-based reconstruction-error summaries across pixel classes.

What carries the argument

The harmonized data cubes that reproject and collocate variables from multiple satellites to a common grid for analysis-ready machine learning use.

If this is right

  • Machine learning applications can proceed directly on the cubes without separate reprojection, resampling, or spatiotemporal alignment steps.
  • Inter-variable analyses and autoencoder reconstruction errors can summarize data quality across pixel classes such as water and cloud.
  • The two modalities enable joint study of spatial detail from Landsat and Sentinel-1 with temporal detail from GOES-R and microwave products.
  • Documentation of variables and metadata supports use cases in urban heat research while highlighting dataset limitations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The common-grid format could allow direct comparison of heat patterns across the 48 cities without city-specific preprocessing pipelines.
  • Adding more cities or extending the time range would test whether the harmonization approach scales to broader geographic coverage.
  • The dataset structure might support transfer of trained models between cities that share similar surface and sensor characteristics.

Load-bearing premise

Reprojecting and collocating the observations preserves their original scientific information content without introducing artifacts that would affect downstream machine learning analyses of urban heat.

What would settle it

A comparison showing that machine learning models trained on the collocated MiniCubes data produce materially different predictions or reconstruction errors for urban heat metrics than the same models trained on the original uncollocated sensor observations.

read the original abstract

Urban heat is amplified by impermeable surfaces and heterogeneous built environments, yet street-level variability remains difficult to quantify because multi-sensor observations are rarely available in consistent, analysis-ready form at the necessary spatiotemporal scales. We present "Urban Heat MiniCubes," a publicly available, FAIR-oriented dataset designed for machine learning applications in urban heat research. The dataset provides harmonized 90 x 90 km gridded data cubes for 48 cities in the Western Hemisphere spanning 2022-2023, with variables reprojected and collocated to a common grid to reduce preprocessing (e.g., reprojection, resampling, and spatiotemporal alignment). Urban Heat MiniCubes includes two complementary modalities: (i) higher-spatial-resolution, lower-frequency observations from Landsat 8/9 (e.g., surface reflectances) and Sentinel-1 (e.g., synthetic aperture radar backscatter), and (ii) higher-temporal-frequency, coarser observations from GOES-R (e.g., longwave infrared brightness temperatures) and a microwave land surface temperature product. We document variables and metadata and provide technical assessment using inter-variable analyses and autoencoder-based reconstruction-error summaries across pixel classes (e.g., water and cloud). Potential use cases and limitations are also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents 'Urban Heat MiniCubes,' a publicly available dataset of harmonized 90 x 90 km gridded data cubes covering 48 cities in the Western Hemisphere for 2022-2023. It combines multi-sensor observations (Landsat 8/9 surface reflectances and Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter at higher spatial/lower temporal resolution; GOES-R longwave IR brightness temperatures and a microwave LST product at higher temporal/coarser spatial resolution), all reprojected and collocated to a common grid. The paper documents variables and metadata, reports technical assessments via inter-variable analyses and autoencoder reconstruction-error summaries across pixel classes (e.g., water, cloud), and discusses use cases and limitations, with the goal of providing analysis-ready data to reduce preprocessing for ML applications in urban heat research.

Significance. If the central claim holds—that the harmonization preserves original information content without introducing artifacts that affect downstream ML analyses—this dataset would provide a useful, FAIR-oriented resource for the urban remote sensing and heat island communities by lowering barriers to multi-sensor analyses. The public release and documentation of two complementary modalities are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the cubes are 'analysis-ready' and suitable for ML on urban heat after reprojection, resampling, and spatiotemporal alignment requires that these steps preserve scientific information content. The described technical assessment (inter-variable analyses and autoencoder reconstruction-error summaries across pixel classes) supplies only global or class-level summaries; it does not include direct tests for spatially coherent artifacts such as edge effects at city boundaries, altered thermal gradients, or changed correlations between SAR backscatter and TIR brightness temperature.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript provides no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMSE or bias against in-situ or native-resolution reference data) or assessment of harmonization artifacts, which are needed to support the 'analysis-ready' quality asserted for ML use.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'Potential use cases and limitations are also discussed' but does not enumerate them; adding a short list would improve reader orientation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the cubes are 'analysis-ready' and suitable for ML on urban heat after reprojection, resampling, and spatiotemporal alignment requires that these steps preserve scientific information content. The described technical assessment (inter-variable analyses and autoencoder reconstruction-error summaries across pixel classes) supplies only global or class-level summaries; it does not include direct tests for spatially coherent artifacts such as edge effects at city boundaries, altered thermal gradients, or changed correlations between SAR backscatter and TIR brightness temperature.

    Authors: The inter-variable analyses and autoencoder reconstruction errors were intended to demonstrate consistency at the pixel-class level relevant to urban heat applications. We agree that explicit evaluation of spatially coherent artifacts is not included in the current version. In revision we will add targeted checks (e.g., gradient preservation and cross-sensor correlation maps) for a representative subset of cities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript provides no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMSE or bias against in-situ or native-resolution reference data) or assessment of harmonization artifacts, which are needed to support the 'analysis-ready' quality asserted for ML use.

    Authors: The harmonization applies standard reprojection and resampling to existing Level-2 satellite products; absolute error metrics against in-situ or native-resolution references are not provided because such ground-truth data are not part of the released dataset. We will revise the limitations section to state this scope explicitly and to clarify that 'analysis-ready' denotes reduced preprocessing rather than independent accuracy validation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain present; data release description only

full rationale

The paper is a dataset release description for Urban Heat MiniCubes. It details data harmonization, reprojection, collocation, and technical assessments (inter-variable analyses, autoencoder reconstruction errors) but contains no claimed derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or mathematical results that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a load-bearing way for any derivation. The central claim (harmonized cubes reduce preprocessing while preserving information) is presented as a factual description of the released product, not as a derived result. This matches the default non-circular case for data papers with no derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a data-release paper; no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or new physical entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5766 in / 1008 out tokens · 16677 ms · 2026-06-27T07:54:56.700486+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Innovation5(2) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024

    Kumar, P., Debele, S.E., Khalili, S., Halios, C.H., Sahani, J., Aghamohammadi, N., Fatima Andrade, M., Athanassiadou, M., Bhui, K., Calvillo, N., et al.: Urban heat mitigation by green and blue infrastructure: Drivers, effectiveness, and future needs. The Innovation5(2) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024. 100588

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024 2024

  2. [2]

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling184, 106420 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106420

    Qi, J., Ding, L., Lim, S.: A decision-making framework to support urban heat mitigation by local governments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling184, 106420 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106420

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106420 2022

  3. [3]

    Atmospheric Research94(3), 491–500 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.006

    Memon, R.A., Leung, D.Y., Liu, C.-H.: An investigation of urban heat island intensity (UHII) as an indicator of urban heating. Atmospheric Research94(3), 491–500 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.07.006 2009

  4. [4]

    Accessed on 6 August 2025 (2023)

    Bureau, U.S.C.: 2020 Census Urban Areas Facts. Accessed on 6 August 2025 (2023). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/ geo-areas/urban-rural/2020-ua-facts.html

    2020

  5. [5]

    Journal of environmental sciences20(1), 120–128 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4

    Rizwan, A.M., Dennis, L.Y.,et al.: A review on the generation, determination and mitigation of Urban Heat Island. Journal of environmental sciences20(1), 120–128 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60019-4 2008

  6. [6]

    Landscape and urban planning125, 234–244 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan

    Wolch, J.R., Byrne, J., Newell, J.P.: Urban green space, public health, and envi- ronmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning125, 234–244 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2014.01.017 36

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan 2014

  7. [7]

    One Earth6(6), 738–750 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.016

    Chakraborty, T., Newman, A.J., Qian, Y., Hsu, A., Sheriff, G.: Residential seg- regation and outdoor urban moist heat stress disparities in the United States. One Earth6(6), 738–750 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.016 2023

  8. [8]

    Environmental Research Letters10(11), 115005 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/ 11/115005

    Mitchell, B.C., Chakraborty, J.: Landscapes of thermal inequity: dispropor- tionate exposure to urban heat in the three largest US cities. Environmental Research Letters10(11), 115005 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/ 11/115005

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/ 2015

  9. [9]

    Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems2(4), 220086 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0086.1

    Molina, M.J., O’Brien, T.A., Anderson, G., Ashfaq, M., Bennett, K.E., Collins, W.D., Dagon, K., Restrepo, J.M., Ullrich, P.A.: A review of recent and emerging machine learning applications for climate variability and weather phenomena. Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems2(4), 220086 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0086.1

    work page doi:10.1175/aies-d-22-0086.1 2023

  10. [10]

    Journal of Agriculture and Food Research16(2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Mohamed, O.Y., Zahidi, I.: Artificial intelligence for predicting urban heat island effect and optimising land use/land cover for mitigation: Prospects and recent advancements. Urban Climate55, 101976 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. uclim.2024.101976

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2024

  11. [11]

    City and Environment Interactions, 100234 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100234

    Ahmed, A.N., AlDahoul, N., Aziz, N.A., Huang, Y., Sherif, M., El-Shafie, A.: The urban heat Island effect: A review on predictive approaches using artificial intelligence models. City and Environment Interactions, 100234 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100234

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100234 2025

  12. [12]

    Ecology98(4), 920–932 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1730

    Young, N.E., Anderson, R.S., Chignell, S.M., Vorster, A.G., Lawrence, R., Evan- gelista, P.H.: A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing. Ecology98(4), 920–932 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1730

    work page doi:10.1002/ecy.1730 2017

  13. [13]

    Wang, J., Legner, C.: What Makes Data AI-Ready? ECIS 2025 TREOs (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Remote Sensing of Environment241, 111723 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111723

    Scheffler, D., Frantz, D., Segl, K.: Spectral harmonization and red edge pre- diction of Landsat-8 to Sentinel-2 using land cover optimized multivariate regressors. Remote Sensing of Environment241, 111723 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111723

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111723 2020

  15. [15]

    Scientific data3, 160018:1–9 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E.,et al.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data3(1), 1–9 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016

  16. [16]

    Available at SSRN (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Verhulst, S., Zahuranec, A.J., Chafetz, H.: Moving Toward the FAIR-R princi- ples: Advancing AI-Ready Data. Available at SSRN (2025) https://doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.5164337

    2025

  17. [17]

    Accessed on 6 August 2025 (2022)

    ESIP: Are Your Data Ready? Take Stock with ESIP’s New AI-Ready Checklist. Accessed on 6 August 2025 (2022). https://www.esipfed.org/ 37 checklist-ai-ready-data/

    2025

  18. [18]

    Brown, C., Kazmierski, M., V, P.: AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label data (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.22291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22291 2025

  19. [19]

    TESSERA: Temporal Embeddings of Surface Spectra for Earth Representation and Analysis

    Feng, Z., Atzberger, C., Jaffer, S., Knezevic, J., Sormunen, S., Young, R., Lisaius, M.C., Immitzer, M., Jackson, T., Ball, J.,et al.: Tessera: Temporal embed- dings of surface spectra for earth representation and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20380 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.20380

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.20380 2025

  20. [20]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology24(3), 301–321 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1976.1

    McPherson, R.A., Fiebrich, C.A., Crawford, K.C., Kilby, J.R., Grimsley, D.L., Martinez, J.E., Basara, J.B., Illston, B.G., Morris, D.A., Kloesel, K.A.,et al.: Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: A technical update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology24(3), 301–321 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1976.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jtech1976.1 2007

  21. [21]

    Journal of Atmo- spheric and Oceanic Technology37(10), 1827–1845 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Brotzge, J.A., Wang, J., Thorncroft, C., Joseph, E., Bain, N., Bassill, N., Far- ruggio, N., Freedman, J., Hemker Jr, K., Johnston, D.,et al.: A technical overview of the New York State Mesonet standard network. Journal of Atmo- spheric and Oceanic Technology37(10), 1827–1845 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1175/JTECH-D-19-0220.1

    2020

  22. [22]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres122(17), 9185–9210 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1002/2017JD026880

    Good, E.J., Ghent, D.J., Bulgin, C.E., Remedios, J.J.: A spatiotemporal anal- ysis of the relationship between near-surface air temperature and satellite land surface temperatures using 17 years of data from the ATSR series. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres122(17), 9185–9210 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1002/2017JD026880

    work page doi:10.1002/2017jd026880 2017

  23. [23]

    Atmosphere13(3), 491 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030491

    Nascimento, A.C.L., Galvani, E., Gobo, J.P.A., Wollmann, C.A.: Comparison between air temperature and land surface temperature for the city of S˜ ao Paulo, Brazil. Atmosphere13(3), 491 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030491

    work page doi:10.3390/atmos13030491 2022

  24. [24]

    Science of The Total Environment905, 167306 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Naserikia, M., Hart, M.A., Nazarian, N., Bechtel, B., Lipson, M., Nice, K.A.: Land surface and air temperature dynamics: The role of urban form and season- ality. Science of The Total Environment905, 167306 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167306

    arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Technical report, United States Geological Survey (2025)

    Anderson, C.: Landsat 8-9 Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Algorithm Description Document (ADD). Technical report, United States Geological Survey (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Sensors19(22), 5049 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225049

    Wang, L., Lu, Y., Yao, Y.: Comparison of three algorithms for the retrieval of land surface temperature from Landsat 8 images. Sensors19(22), 5049 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225049

    work page doi:10.3390/s19225049 2019

  27. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing56(10), 5717–5735 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2824828

    Malakar, N.K., Hulley, G.C., Hook, S.J., Laraby, K., Cook, M., Schott, J.R.: 38 An operational land surface temperature product for Landsat thermal data: Methodology and validation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing56(10), 5717–5735 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2824828

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2824828 2018

  28. [28]

    Remote sensing9(12), 1208 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121208

    Parastatidis, D., Mitraka, Z., Chrysoulakis, N., Abrams, M.: Online global land surface temperature estimation from Landsat. Remote sensing9(12), 1208 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121208

    work page doi:10.3390/rs9121208 2017

  29. [29]

    In: Earth Science Satellite Remote Sens- ing: Vol

    Murphy, R., Ardanuy, P., Deluccia, F.J., Clement, J., Schueler, C.F.: The visible infrared imaging radiometer suite. In: Earth Science Satellite Remote Sens- ing: Vol. 1: Science and Instruments, pp. 199–223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37293-6 11

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37293-6 2006

  30. [30]

    Remote Sensing of Environment280, 113195 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113195

    Wulder, M.A., Roy, D.P., Radeloff, V.C., Loveland, T.R., Anderson, M.C., John- son, D.M., Healey, S., Zhu, Z., Scambos, T.A., Pahlevan, N.,et al.: Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts. Remote Sensing of Environment280, 113195 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113195

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2022.113195 2022

  31. [31]

    Remote sensing of environment124, 108–121 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.024

    Benali, A., Carvalho, A., Nunes, J.P., Carvalhais, N., Santos, A.: Estimating air surface temperature in Portugal using MODIS LST data. Remote sensing of environment124, 108–121 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.024 2012

  32. [32]

    Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society105(3), 660–679 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-23-0048.1

    Lindsey, D.T., Heidinger, A.K., Sullivan, P.C., McCorkel, J., Schmit, T.J., Tomlinson, M., Vandermeulen, R., Frost, G.J., Kondragunta, S., Rudlosky, S.: GeoXO: NOAA’s future geostationary satellite system. Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society105(3), 660–679 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-23-0048.1

    2024

  33. [33]

    Remote Sensing16(24), 4629 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244629

    Ni, Z., Wu, M., Lu, Q., Huo, H., Wu, C., Liu, R., Wang, F., Xu, X.: A Review of Research on Cloud Detection Methods for Hyperspectral Infrared Radiances. Remote Sensing16(24), 4629 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244629

    work page doi:10.3390/rs16244629 2024

  34. [34]

    all weather,

    Prigent, C., Jimenez, C., Aires, F.: Toward “all weather,” long record, and real- time land surface temperature retrievals from microwave satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres121(10), 5699–5717 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024402

    work page doi:10.1002/2015jd024402 2016

  35. [35]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45(7), 2004–2018 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.898436

    Jones, L.A., Kimball, J.S., McDonald, K.C., Chan, S.T.K., Njoku, E.G., Oechel, W.C.: Satellite microwave remote sensing of boreal and arctic soil temperatures from AMSR-E. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45(7), 2004–2018 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.898436

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.898436 2004

  36. [36]

    Technical report, United States Geological Survey (2019)

    Ihlen, V.: Landsat 8 (L8) Data Users Handbook. Technical report, United States Geological Survey (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Earth Systems and Environment 5(3), 667–693 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00243-4

    Imran, H., Hossain, A., Islam, A.S., Rahman, A., Bhuiyan, M.A.E., Paul, S., Alam, A.: Impact of land cover changes on land surface temperature and human 39 thermal comfort in Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Earth Systems and Environment 5(3), 667–693 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00243-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s41748-021-00243-4 2021

  38. [38]

    Landscape and Urban Planning 204, 103927 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103927

    Zhao, J., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Du, X., Xu, P., Wu, D.: Assessing the thermal contributions of urban land cover types. Landscape and Urban Planning 204, 103927 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103927

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103927 2020

  39. [39]

    Remote sens- ing of environment194, 379–390 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03

    Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley Jr, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B.: Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote sens- ing of environment194, 379–390 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03. 026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.03 2017

  40. [40]

    Theoretical and applied climatology95(3), 397–406 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0017-5

    Hart, M.A., Sailor, D.J.: Quantifying the influence of land-use and surface char- acteristics on spatial variability in the urban heat island. Theoretical and applied climatology95(3), 397–406 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0017-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0017-5 2009

  41. [41]

    Remote sensing of environment120, 9–24 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05

    Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E., Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M.,et al.: GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote sensing of environment120, 9–24 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05. 028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05 2012

  42. [42]

    SentiWiki Home

    ESA: Sentinel-1. SentiWiki Home. Accessed on 6 August 2025 (2025). https: //sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/web/sentinel-1

    2025

  43. [43]

    Remote Sensing16(11), 1923 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16111923

    Koukiou, G.: SAR Features and Techniques for Urban Planning—A Review. Remote Sensing16(11), 1923 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16111923

    work page doi:10.3390/rs16111923 1923

  44. [44]

    Landscape and urban planning151, 55–63 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016

    Zhang, H., Lin, H., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Fang, C.: Mapping urban impervious surface with dual-polarimetric SAR data: An improved method. Landscape and urban planning151, 55–63 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016. 03.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016 2016

  45. [45]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 49, 1520–1535

    Sauer, S., Ferro-Famil, L., Reigber, A., Pottier, E.: Three-dimensional imag- ing and scattering mechanism estimation over urban scenes using dual-baseline polarimetric InSAR observations at L-band. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49(11), 4616–4629 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS. 2011.2147321

    work page doi:10.1109/tgrs 2011

  46. [46]

    Remote Sensing12(12), 1952 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121952

    Gaˇ sparovi´ c, M., Dobrini´ c, D.: Comparative assessment of machine learning methods for urban vegetation mapping using multitemporal sentinel-1 imagery. Remote Sensing12(12), 1952 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121952

    work page doi:10.3390/rs12121952 1952

  47. [47]

    International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation103, 102496 (2021) https: 40 //doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102496

    Bai, Y., Sun, G., Li, Y., Ma, P., Li, G., Zhang, Y.: Comprehensively analyzing optical and polarimetric SAR features for land-use/land-cover classification and urban vegetation extraction in highly-dense urban area. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation103, 102496 (2021) https: 40 //doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102496

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jag.2021.102496 2021

  48. [48]

    IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing40(3), 687–698 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TGRS.2002.1000328

    Schuler, D.L., Lee, J.-S., Kasilingam, D., Nesti, G.: Surface roughness and slope measurements using polarimetric SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing40(3), 687–698 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TGRS.2002.1000328

    arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society98(4), 681–698 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-15-00230.1

    Schmit, T.J., Griffith, P., Gunshor, M.M., Daniels, J.M., Goodman, S.J., Lebair, W.J.: A closer look at the ABI on the GOES-R series. Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society98(4), 681–698 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1175/ BAMS-D-15-00230.1

    2017

  50. [50]

    Valenti, J.: GOES-R SERIES PRODUCT DEFINITION AND USERS’ GUIDE. Technical report, United States Department of Commerce and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NOAA Satellite and Information Service National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    High tem- perature57(4), 573–595 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X19040199

    Smirnov, B.: Infrared Radiation in the Energetics of the Atmosphere. High tem- perature57(4), 573–595 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X19040199

    work page doi:10.1134/s0018151x19040199 2019

  52. [52]

    Reviews of Geophysics 46(4) (2008) https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000233

    Harries, J., Carli, B., Rizzi, R., Serio, C., Mlynczak, M., Palchetti, L., Maestri, T., Brindley, H., Masiello, G.: The far-infrared Earth. Reviews of Geophysics 46(4) (2008) https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000233

    work page doi:10.1029/2007rg000233 2008

  53. [53]

    Bulletin of the American meteorological society101(12), 2030–2046 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0322.1

    Palchetti, L., Brindley, H., Bantges, R., Buehler, S., Camy-Peyret, C., Carli, B., Cortesi, U., Del Bianco, S., Di Natale, G., Dinelli, B.,et al.: unique far- infrared satellite observations to better understand how Earth radiates energy to space. Bulletin of the American meteorological society101(12), 2030–2046 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0322.1

    work page doi:10.1175/bams-d-19-0322.1 2030

  54. [54]

    Sundog Publishing, Madison, WI (2006)

    Petty, G.W.: A First Course in Atmospheric Radiation, 2nd edn. Sundog Publishing, Madison, WI (2006). Chap. 12

    2006

  55. [55]

    Remote Sensing of Environment158, 110–125 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014

    Holmes, T., Crow, W., Hain, C., Anderson, M., Kustas, W.: Diurnal tempera- ture cycle as observed by thermal infrared and microwave radiometers. Remote Sensing of Environment158, 110–125 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014. 10.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014 2015

  56. [56]

    Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society83(7), 977–992 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1175/ 1520-0477(2002)083⟨0977:AITMSG⟩2.3.CO;2

    Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat second generation (MSG). Bulletin of the Amer- ican Meteorological Society83(7), 977–992 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1175/ 1520-0477(2002)083⟨0977:AITMSG⟩2.3.CO;2

    2002

  57. [57]

    Hydrology and earth system sciences22(2), 1351–1369 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1351-2018 41

    Holmes, T.R., Hain, C.R., Crow, W.T., Anderson, M.C., Kustas, W.P.: Microwave implementation of two-source energy balance approach for estimat- ing evapotranspiration. Hydrology and earth system sciences22(2), 1351–1369 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1351-2018 41

    work page doi:10.5194/hess-22-1351-2018 2018

  58. [58]

    Hydrology and earth system sciences 11(5), 1633–1644 (2007) https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

    Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L., McMahon, T.A.: Updated world map of the K¨ oppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and earth system sciences 11(5), 1633–1644 (2007) https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007

    work page doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 2007

  59. [59]

    Scientific data5(1), 1–12 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018

    Beck, H.E., Zimmermann, N.E., McVicar, T.R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., Wood, E.F.: Present and future K¨ oppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific data5(1), 1–12 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018. 214

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2018 2018

  60. [60]

    Remote sensing of Environment202, 18–27 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017

    Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R.: Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote sensing of Environment202, 18–27 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017. 06.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017 2017

  61. [61]

    US Geological Survey, Professional Paper (1997)

    Moore, L.: Transverse mercator projections and us geological survey digital products. US Geological Survey, Professional Paper (1997)

    1997

  62. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol

    Brooks, W.: The universal transverse mercator grid. In: Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol. 83, pp. 250–258 (1973)

    1973

  63. [63]

    https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.17801666

    Eaton, B., Gregory, J., Drach, B., Taylor, K., Hankin, S., et al.: NetCDF Cli- mate and Forecast (CF) Metadata Conventions (1.13) (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.17801666

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17801666 2025

  64. [64]

    Technical report, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2020)

    Wu, X., Shmit, T.: Product Performance Guide for Data Users of GOES-17 ABI Level 1b and Cloud and Moisture Imagery (CMI) Products. Technical report, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    Technical report, NOAA NESDIS STAR (2012)

    Sun, D., Fang, L., Yu, Y.: GOES LST ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT VERSION 3.0. Technical report, NOAA NESDIS STAR (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    In: ITM Web of Conferences, vol

    Weglarczyk, S.: Kernel density estimation and its application. In: ITM Web of Conferences, vol. 23, p. 00037 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/ 20182300037 . EDP Sciences

    work page doi:10.1051/itmconf/ 2018

  67. [67]

    Biostatistics & Epidemiology1(1), 161–187 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 24709360.2017.1396742

    Chen, Y.-C.: A tutorial on kernel density estimation and recent advances. Biostatistics & Epidemiology1(1), 161–187 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 24709360.2017.1396742

    arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    Biometrika66(3), 605–610 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.3.605

    Scott, D.W.: On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika66(3), 605–610 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.3.605

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/66.3.605 1979

  69. [69]

    The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1–1 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524

    McKnight, P.E., Najab, J.: Mann-whitney U test. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1–1 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524

    work page doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524 2010

  70. [70]

    URl: http://alexlenail

    Lenail, A.: NN-SVG: Publication-ready nn-architecture schematics. URl: http://alexlenail. me/NN-SVG (2020) 42

    2020

  71. [71]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences116(G3) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001486

    Mildrexler, D.J., Zhao, M., Running, S.W.: A global comparison between sta- tion air temperatures and MODIS land surface temperatures reveals the cooling role of forests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences116(G3) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001486

    work page doi:10.1029/2010jg001486 2011

  72. [72]

    International Journal of Remote Sensing 38(4), 1114–1136 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1280629

    Sheng, Y., Liu, X., Yang, X., Xin, Q., Deng, C., Li, X.: Quantifying the spatial and temporal relationship between air and land surface temperatures of different land-cover types in Southeastern China. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38(4), 1114–1136 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1280629

    work page doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1280629 2017

  73. [73]

    Environmental research letters5(4), 044004 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044004

    Jin, M., Dickinson, R.E.: Land surface skin temperature climatology: benefitting from the strengths of satellite observations. Environmental research letters5(4), 044004 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044004 2010

  74. [74]

    Theoretical and applied climatology119(3), 567–583 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Sohrabinia, M., Zawar-Reza, P., Rack, W.: Spatio-temporal analysis of the relationship between LST from MODIS and air temperature in New Zealand. Theoretical and applied climatology119(3), 567–583 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00704-014-1106-2

    2015

  75. [75]

    Landscape and Urban Planning206, 103979 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103979

    Cao, J., Zhou, W., Zheng, Z., Ren, T., Wang, W.: Within-city spatial and temporal heterogeneity of air temperature and its relationship with land sur- face temperature. Landscape and Urban Planning206, 103979 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103979

    work page doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103979 2021

  76. [76]

    Remote Sensing14(3), 719 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs14030719

    Sui, S., Sun, L.: Comparative analysis of several typical Landsat 8 OLI cloud detection methods. Remote Sensing14(3), 719 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs14030719

    2022

  77. [77]

    The Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Version 2.0 Surface Reflectance Dataset,

    Ju, J., Zhou, Q., Freitag, B., Roy, D.P., Zhang, H.K., Sridhar, M., Mandel, J., Arab, S., Schmidt, G., Crawford, C.J.,et al.: The Harmonized Land- sat and Sentinel-2 version 2.0 surface reflectance dataset. Remote Sensing of Environment324, 114723 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114723

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rse.2025.114723 2025

  78. [78]

    Nature Climate Change14(9), 916–928 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41558-024-02095-y

    Eyring, V., Collins, W.D., Gentine, P., Barnes, E.A., Barreiro, M., Beucler, T., Bocquet, M., Bretherton, C.S., Christensen, H.M., Dagon, K.,et al.: Pushing the frontiers in climate modelling and analysis with machine learn- ing. Nature Climate Change14(9), 916–928 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41558-024-02095-y

    2024

  79. [79]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ledig, C., Theis, L., Husz´ ar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z.,et al.: Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4681–4690 (2017)

    2017

  80. [80]

    Earth-Science Reviews 43 232, 104110 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104110

    Wang, P., Bayram, B., Sertel, E.: A comprehensive review on deep learning based remote sensing image super-resolution methods. Earth-Science Reviews 43 232, 104110 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104110

    work page doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104110 2022

Showing first 80 references.