pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11840 · v2 · pith:G5GP6N7Snew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Sparsity-Driven Source Localization in Tomographic Sensing Applications

Marco Mattuschka , Noah An der Lan , Stefanie Schr\"oder , Arne Ficks , Max von Danwitz , Alexander Popp This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords sparsity regularizationsource localizationtomographic sensingadvection-diffusion equationinverse problemcontaminant plumestandoff detectionlevel-set method
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sparsity-promoting regularization identifies, localizes, and quantifies contaminant release sources from tomographic standoff measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models contaminant transport with an advection-diffusion equation and formulates the corresponding inverse source problem from data collected by two simultaneous FPA-FTIR spectrometers. Because the measurements are severely underdetermined and ill-posed, the authors apply sparsity-promoting regularization inside a high-performance optimization routine. A level-set description of concentration thresholds lets the tomographic data enter the discrete problem without tying the formulation to any particular mesh. The resulting procedure recovers source positions and strengths, after which plume evolution can be forecasted for early-warning use.

Core claim

Modeling transport by the advection-diffusion equation and solving the inverse source problem with sparsity-promoting regularization together with an efficient optimizer recovers the locations and release rates of contaminant sources from paired standoff tomographic measurements; the measurements are incorporated via a level-set representation of a concentration threshold that remains independent of the computational mesh.

What carries the argument

Sparsity-promoting regularization term added to the objective of the discrete inverse source problem, combined with a level-set description that encodes threshold concentration surfaces for mesh-independent incorporation of tomographic data.

If this is right

  • Source number, positions, and strengths can be recovered without any prior assumption on the number of active releases.
  • Once sources are identified, the same transport model yields forward predictions of plume evolution from the standoff data.
  • The level-set measurement representation allows the optimization to proceed on a fixed mesh even when sensor geometry changes.
  • Quantification of release rates becomes available alongside localization, supporting material-balance estimates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sparsity-plus-level-set construction could be tested on other sparse-source inverse problems that use remote sensing, such as volcanic emission tracking or industrial leak detection.
  • Coupling the optimizer to streaming sensor feeds would turn the static reconstruction into a dynamic filter that updates source estimates in real time.
  • A controlled release experiment with independently measured wind and diffusion parameters would directly test whether the recovered sources converge to ground truth as measurement density increases.

Load-bearing premise

Contaminant transport is adequately described by an advection-diffusion equation whose parameters are known well enough for the regularized inverse problem to remain solvable.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic tomographic data from a known sparse set of point sources under the advection-diffusion model with fixed parameters, then run the algorithm and check whether the recovered source locations and strengths match the input configuration within the tolerance implied by the regularization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11840 by Alexander Popp, Arne Ficks, Marco Mattuschka, Max von Danwitz, Noah An der Lan, Stefanie Schr\"oder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Modeled measurement setup with two FPA-FTIR measuring stations (green-yellow dots, left), FPA-FTIR hyperspectral imaging measurement device in another campaign [2](top middle), synthetic signal (extracted contour) representing gas tomography result in the modeled setup (right) Standoff hyperspectral imaging detectors are particularly suited for monitoring a large area within their line of sight[6], while r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Shows the test area Ω (left) and the estimated wind field (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical simulation of contamination dispersion at the beginning of the release ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Shows the contaminant after 5.0 s seconds and the contour Γ5.0 s = {𝑥 ∈ Ω|𝑢true(𝑡, 𝑥) = 10−3} captured by the measurement system (yellow ellipse, left) and the solution q of the adjoint problem () for 𝑐 = 10−3 at 𝑡 = 𝑡 obs , computed using the inverted wind field (right). while only the source locations and amplitudes remain unknown. More precisely, for a prescribed shape function  ∶ Ω × Ω → ℝ, we consi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Predicted raw sources 𝜆𝑖 𝛿𝑥𝑖 (left) and derived source 𝜇post (red dot) near ground truth source center (black cross, right) numerical robustness, each point 𝛾𝑗 is assumed to lie at the barycenter 𝛾𝑗 ≈ 1 3 (𝑝𝑗0 + 𝑝𝑗1 + 𝑝𝑗2 ) of a finite element 𝐾𝑗 = conv{𝑝𝑗0 , 𝑝𝑗1 , 𝑝𝑗2 } ⊂ Ω. Since linear finite elements are employed, the basis functions satisfy 𝐶𝑗𝑖 ∶= 𝜙𝑖 (𝛾𝑗 ) = {1 3 , 𝑖 ∈ {𝑗0 , 𝑗1 , 𝑗2 }, 0, otherwise, (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 4 Numerical Results To demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed method, we employ an automated computational pipeline that imports building footprints directly from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and incorporates them as obstacles into the computational domain; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstruction of the contaminant concentration at measurement time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Reconstruction of the contaminant concentration at measurement time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Shows the recorded values (black dots) of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hyperspectral standoff detection systems such as Focal Plane Array (FPA) Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometers provide high spatial resolution in detecting airborne chemical contaminants that are invisible to the human eye but potentially hazardous. When two such systems are operated simultaneously with a suitable opening angle, they enable tomographic reconstruction of contaminant plumes with improved spatial and temporal accuracy. This work presents a mathematical model of these measurement capabilities and an algorithm to identify, localize, and quantify contaminant release sources. The objective is to develop a a tool that reconstructs release locations and predict the future plume evolution from standoff measurement data, thereby supporting early warning and situational awareness in hazardous material release scenarios. The transport of contaminants is modeled by an advection-diffusion equation, and the corresponding inverse problem for source identification is formulated accordingly. Owing to the severe ill-posedness and underdetermination of the problem, a sparsity-promoting regularization approach is employed together with a high-performance optimization algorithm. To incorporate the tomographic measurement data into the discrete formulation, a level-set description of a threshold concentration is used, allowing the measurements to be represented independently of the computational mesh and avoiding costly remeshing procedures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates an inverse source problem for localizing and quantifying contaminant releases from tomographic standoff measurements obtained with two hyperspectral FTIR systems. Transport is modeled by the advection-diffusion equation; the severely underdetermined inverse problem is regularized by a sparsity-promoting term and solved with a high-performance optimizer. Tomographic data are incorporated via a level-set representation of a concentration threshold, which decouples the measurement operator from the computational mesh.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under realistic conditions, the combination of sparsity regularization and the level-set measurement operator would constitute a practical contribution to standoff detection applications. The level-set formulation is a clear strength, as it avoids remeshing while allowing direct use of threshold-based tomographic data. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present; the work is algorithmic and relies on the standard assumption that the forward operator is known accurately.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (Mathematical Model) and the paragraph on the inverse problem: the central claim that sparsity regularization renders the inverse source problem solvable presupposes that the advection-diffusion parameters (velocity field, diffusivity) are known to high accuracy. No sensitivity analysis, joint parameter estimation, or Monte-Carlo study against 5–10 % perturbations in wind velocity is reported, yet such perturbations are common in field data and would alter the Green's function, potentially invalidating the recovery guarantees.
  2. [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section (presumably §4–5): the validation results are presented only for the nominal forward operator; without the missing robustness tests, it is impossible to assess whether the reported localization accuracy survives realistic model error, which is load-bearing for the early-warning application claimed in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, line 8: 'develop a a tool' contains a duplicated article.
  2. [§3] Notation for the level-set function and the measurement operator should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the discrete formulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments below and commit to revisions that strengthen the robustness analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (Mathematical Model) and the paragraph on the inverse problem: the central claim that sparsity regularization renders the inverse source problem solvable presupposes that the advection-diffusion parameters (velocity field, diffusivity) are known to high accuracy. No sensitivity analysis, joint parameter estimation, or Monte-Carlo study against 5–10 % perturbations in wind velocity is reported, yet such perturbations are common in field data and would alter the Green's function, potentially invalidating the recovery guarantees.

    Authors: The formulation does assume known transport parameters, which is a standard assumption in many inverse source problems focused on source identification rather than parameter estimation. The sparsity regularization addresses the ill-posedness under this model. We agree that sensitivity to perturbations is relevant for the application. In the revised version, we will add a sensitivity study with Monte-Carlo simulations under 5-10% perturbations in wind velocity to assess the impact on recovery. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section (presumably §4–5): the validation results are presented only for the nominal forward operator; without the missing robustness tests, it is impossible to assess whether the reported localization accuracy survives realistic model error, which is load-bearing for the early-warning application claimed in the abstract.

    Authors: The presented experiments validate the method with the exact forward operator to demonstrate the effectiveness of the sparsity and level-set approaches. To address concerns about model mismatch, the revised manuscript will include additional numerical tests incorporating perturbations in the advection-diffusion parameters and report the resulting localization accuracy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard sparsity regularization applied to inverse problem

full rationale

The paper models contaminant transport with the advection-diffusion equation, formulates the inverse source problem from tomographic standoff data using a level-set measurement operator, and applies sparsity-promoting regularization solved by a high-performance optimizer. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the regularization is described as a standard tool for ill-posed inverse problems. The derivation remains independent of the paper's own outputs and relies on external mathematical and numerical methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the advection-diffusion model and sparsity regularization are treated as standard tools.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5748 in / 1013 out tokens · 14753 ms · 2026-06-27T09:13:39.178074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dissemination monitoring by LWIR hyperspectral imaging

    F. Wilsenack et al. “Dissemination monitoring by LWIR hyperspectral imaging”. In:Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XX. Ed. by Jason A. Guicheteau and Chris R. Howle. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2019, p. 1101007.DOI:10.1117/12.2518834.URL: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2518834

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2518834.url: 2019

  2. [2]

    Combining standoff tomography with point detection: a game changer for the identifi- cation of airborne toxic chemicals

    Frank Wilsenack et al. “Combining standoff tomography with point detection: a game changer for the identifi- cation of airborne toxic chemicals”. In:Proc. SPIE. SPIE, 2024.DOI:10.1117/12.3013427

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3013427 2024

  3. [3]

    Sparse source identification in transient advection-diffusion problems with a primal-dual-active-point strategy

    Marco Mattuschka et al. “Sparse source identification in transient advection-diffusion problems with a primal-dual-active-point strategy”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering454 (2026), p. 118854.ISSN: 0045-7825.DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2026.118854

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2026.118854 2026

  4. [4]

    Current status of research on chemical warfare agent detection technology

    Zhehao Zhang et al. “Current status of research on chemical warfare agent detection technology”. In:TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry193 (2025), p. 118474.ISSN: 0165-9936.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.trac.2025.118474.URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016599362 5003425

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    A Review of Chemical Warfare Agent (CW A) Detector Technologies and Commercial-Off- The-Shelf Items

    R. Sferopoulos. “A Review of Chemical Warfare Agent (CW A) Detector Technologies and Commercial-Off- The-Shelf Items.” In:Science and Technology Organisation Technical Report(2009).URL:https://www.sc iencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993625003425

    2009

  6. [6]

    Toxic cloud imaging by infrared spectrometry: A scanning FTIR system for identification and visualization

    Roland Harig and Gerhard Matz. “Toxic cloud imaging by infrared spectrometry: A scanning FTIR system for identification and visualization”. In:Field Analytical Chemistry & Technology5.1-2 (2001), pp. 75–90.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fact.1008. eprint:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.10 02/fact.1008.URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/1...

    work page doi:10.1002/fact.1008 2001

  7. [7]

    Real-Time Remote Detection of Airborne Chemical Hazards—An Unmanned Aerial Vehi- cle (UA V) Carrying an Ion Mobility Spectrometer

    Maria Allers et al. “Real-Time Remote Detection of Airborne Chemical Hazards—An Unmanned Aerial Vehi- cle (UA V) Carrying an Ion Mobility Spectrometer”. In:IEEE Sensors Journal23.15 (2023), pp. 16562–16570. DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2023.3287448

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3287448 2023

  8. [8]

    Remote detection of gases and liquids by imaging Fourier transform spectrometry using a focal plane array detector: first results

    Roland Harig et al. “Remote detection of gases and liquids by imaging Fourier transform spectrometry using a focal plane array detector: first results”. In:Chemical and Biological Sensors for Industrial and Environmental Monitoring II. Ed. by Steven D. Christesen et al. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2006, p. 637816.DOI:10.1117/12.692922

    work page doi:10.1117/12.692922 2006

  9. [9]

    Detection and 3D characterization of short-time chemical exposures with a dual setup of IR focal plane arrays

    Frank Wilsenack et al. “Detection and 3D characterization of short-time chemical exposures with a dual setup of IR focal plane arrays”. In:Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XXIV. Ed. by Jason A. Guicheteau and Christopher R. Howle. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2023, p. 1254102.DOI:10.1117/...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2663155.url:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2663155 2023

  10. [10]

    Uncertainty quantification and atmospheric source estimation with a discrepancy- based and a state-dependent adaptative MCMC

    Roseane A. S. Albani et al. “Uncertainty quantification and atmospheric source estimation with a discrepancy- based and a state-dependent adaptative MCMC”. In:Environmental Pollution290 (2021), p. 118039.DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118039 2021

  11. [11]

    Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective

    A. M. Stuart. “Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective”. In:Acta Numerica19 (2010), pp. 451–559.DOI: 10.1017/S0962492910000061

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492910000061 2010

  12. [12]

    A generalized probabilistic learning approach for multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification in complex physical simulations

    Jonas Nitzler et al. “A generalized probabilistic learning approach for multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification in complex physical simulations”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering400 (2022), p. 115600.ISSN: 0045-7825.DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115600. 9 Algorithmic Identification of Moving Contaminant Sources

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115600 2022

  13. [13]

    Identifying sources of groundwater pollution: An optimization approach

    Steven M. Gorelick, Barbara Evans, and Irwin Remson. “Identifying sources of groundwater pollution: An optimization approach”. In:Water Resources Research19.3 (1983), pp. 779–790.DOI:10.1029/WR019i003p 00779

    work page doi:10.1029/wr019i003p 1983

  14. [14]

    Heat source identification based on𝑙 1 constrained minimiza- tion

    Richard Tsai, Stanley Osher, and Yingying Li. “Heat source identification based on𝑙 1 constrained minimiza- tion”. In:Inverse Problems and Imaging8.1 (2014), pp. 199–221.DOI:10.3934/ipi.2014.8.199

    work page doi:10.3934/ipi.2014.8.199 2014

  15. [15]

    hipPYlib: An extensible software framework for large-scale inverse problems governed by PDEs: Part I: Deterministic inversion and linearized Bayesian inference

    Umberto Villa, Noemi Petra, and Omar Ghattas. “hIPPYlib”. In:ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 47.2 (2021), pp. 1–34.DOI:10.1145/3428447

    work page doi:10.1145/3428447 2021

  16. [16]

    Domain Knowledge Assisted Gas Tomography

    Thomas Wiedemann et al. “Domain Knowledge Assisted Gas Tomography”. In:2024 IEEE International Sym- posium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–3.ISBN: 979-8-3503-4865-1.DOI:10.1 109/ISOEN61239.2024.10556226

    arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    https://math.nyu.edu/~stadler/papers/PetraStadler11.pdf

    Noei Petra and Georg Stadler.Model Variational Inverse Problems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. https://math.nyu.edu/~stadler/papers/PetraStadler11.pdf. The University of Texas, 2011

    2011

  18. [18]

    An Offline-Online Decomposition Method for Efficient Linear Bayesian Goal-Oriented Optimal Experimental Design: Application to Optimal Sensor Placement

    Keyi Wu, Peng Chen, and Omar Ghattas. “An Offline-Online Decomposition Method for Efficient Linear Bayesian Goal-Oriented Optimal Experimental Design: Application to Optimal Sensor Placement”. In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing45.1 (2023), B57–B77.ISSN: 1064-8275.DOI:10.1137/21M1466542

    work page doi:10.1137/21m1466542 2023

  19. [19]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , year =

    Alen Alexanderian et al. “A-Optimal Design of Experiments for Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Linear Inverse Problems with Regularized𝓁 0-Sparsification”. In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing36.5 (2014), A2122– A2148.ISSN: 1064-8275.DOI:10.1137/130933381

    work page doi:10.1137/130933381 2014

  20. [20]

    Efficient D-Optimal Design of Experiments for Infinite- Dimensional Bayesian Linear Inverse Problems

    Alen Alexanderian and Arvind K. Saibaba. “Efficient D-Optimal Design of Experiments for Infinite- Dimensional Bayesian Linear Inverse Problems”. In:SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing40.5 (2018), A2956–A2985.ISSN: 1064-8275.DOI:10.1137/17M115712X

    work page doi:10.1137/17m115712x 2018

  21. [21]

    Goal-oriented optimal design of experiments for large-scale Bayesian linear inverse problems

    Ahmed Attia, Alen Alexanderian, and Arvind K. Saibaba. “Goal-oriented optimal design of experiments for large-scale Bayesian linear inverse problems”. In:Inverse Problems34.9 (2018), p. 095009.DOI:10.1088/13 61-6420/aad210

    work page doi:10.1088/13 2018

  22. [22]

    From Data to Decisions: A Real-Time Measurement–Inversion–Prediction–Steering Framework for Hazardous Events and Health Monitoring

    Sonja Wogrin et al. “From Data to Decisions: A Real-Time Measurement–Inversion–Prediction–Steering Framework for Hazardous Events and Health Monitoring”. In:Handbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applica- tions Systems. Ed. by Frederica Darema et al. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 195–227. ISBN: 978-3-031-27985-0.DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27986-7_8 2023

  23. [23]

    Linear convergence of accelerated conditional gradient algorithms in spaces of measures

    Konstantin Pieper and Daniel Walter. “Linear convergence of accelerated conditional gradient algorithms in spaces of measures”. In:ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations27 (2021), p. 38.ISSN: 1292-8119.DOI:10.1051/cocv/2021042

    work page doi:10.1051/cocv/2021042 2021

  24. [24]

    A low-rank solver for the stochastic unsteady Navier–Stokes problem

    Howard C. Elman and Tengfei Su. “A low-rank solver for the stochastic unsteady Navier–Stokes problem”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering364 (2020), p. 112948.ISSN: 0045-7825.DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.112948

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.112948 2020

  25. [25]

    Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method

    Charles S Peskin. “Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method”. In:Journal of Computational Physics10.2 (1972), pp. 252–271.ISSN: 0021-9991.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(72)90 065-4.URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021999172900654

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(72)90 1972

  26. [26]

    Time–continuous and time–discontinuous space–time finite elements for advection– diffusion problems

    Max von Danwitz et al. “Time–continuous and time–discontinuous space–time finite elements for advection– diffusion problems”. In:International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering124.14 (2023), pp. 3117– 3144.DOI:10.1002/nme.7241

    work page doi:10.1002/nme.7241 2023

  27. [27]

    Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convec- tion dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

    Alexander N. Brooks and Thomas J.R. Hughes. “Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convec- tion dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations”. In:Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering32.1-3 (1982), pp. 199–259.DOI:10.1016/0045-7825(82 )90071-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0045-7825(82 1982

  28. [28]

    Baratta et al.DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment

    Igor A. Baratta et al.DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment. 2023.DOI:10.52 81/zenodo.10447666

    2023

  29. [29]

    Towards Real-Time Urban Physics Simulations with Digital Twins

    Jacopo Bonari et al. “Towards Real-Time Urban Physics Simulations with Digital Twins”. In:2024 28th Inter- national Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT). IEEE, 2024, pp. 18–25. ISBN: 979-8-3315-2721-1.DOI:10.1109/DS-RT62209.2024.00013

    work page doi:10.1109/ds-rt62209.2024.00013 2024

  30. [30]

    Nitsche’s method for Navier–Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions

    Ingeborg Gjerde and L. Scott. “Nitsche’s method for Navier–Stokes equations with slip boundary conditions”. In:Mathematics of Computation91.334 (2022), pp. 597–622.DOI:10.1090/mcom/3682

    work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3682 2022

  31. [31]

    Goal-oriented optimal sensor placement for PDE-constrained inverse problems in crisis management

    Marco Mattuschka et al. “Goal-oriented optimal sensor placement for PDE-constrained inverse problems in crisis management”. In:Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science(Feb. 2026).DOI:10.24423 /cames.2026.1887. 10 Algorithmic Identification of Moving Contaminant Sources

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Compact polarization lidar system at a 1550 nm wavelength for aerosol anomaly de- tection

    Sebastian Zajonz et al. “Compact polarization lidar system at a 1550 nm wavelength for aerosol anomaly de- tection”. In:Applied Optics65.7 (2026), pp. 2229–2235.DOI:10.1364/AO.581511.URL:https://opg.op tica.org/ao/fulltext.cfm?uri=ao-65-7-2229. 11

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.581511.url:https://opg.op 2026