pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12201 · v1 · pith:6OGJKLPGnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

Materealistic? How European energy system models exceed raw material reserves

Jan Mutke , Jonas Finke , Katharina Esser , Heidi Heinrichs This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords energy system modelscritical raw materialsdecarbonisationmaterial feasibilityEuropean energy transitionraw material reservesenergy sufficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Decarbonised European energy models exceed population shares of global reserves for seven materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews 59 studies that model highly decarbonised European energy systems and performs an ex-post calculation of the raw materials needed for five key technologies across nineteen materials. It compares those demands to the share of current global reserves that would be allocated to Europe on a population basis. Demands surpass the shares for gallium, indium, iridium and tellurium, with additional shortfalls for silver, selenium and vanadium once electricity, heat and transport sectors are modelled together. The analysis shows that efficiency improvements, recycling and reserve growth can only partly close the gaps, leading to the conclusion that energy sufficiency measures are required.

Core claim

A systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies combined with quantitative ex-post assessment of material demands for five key technologies and nineteen materials finds that material demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for gallium, indium, iridium and tellurium, less pronounced for silver, selenium and vanadium, particularly when multiple sectors of the energy system are considered.

What carries the argument

Ex-post material demand assessment applied to the 59 studies, using material intensities for five key technologies and nineteen materials, then compared directly to Europe's population-proportional share of global reserves.

If this is right

  • Material shortfalls become larger when electricity, heat and transport are all included in the models.
  • Non-energy uses of the same materials increase the overall scarcity pressure.
  • Technological innovation can either reduce or raise material requirements depending on the direction of change.
  • Efficiency, recycling and expanded reserves only partly relieve the identified shortages.
  • Energy sufficiency measures are needed to reach sustainability in the energy-material system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future energy system studies will need to incorporate material constraints from the start rather than treating them as an afterthought.
  • European policy targets may require explicit trade-offs between deployment speed and material availability.
  • Global coordination on recycling and new mining will be necessary if European scenarios are to be realised without major shortfalls.

Load-bearing premise

The material intensity numbers taken from the studies accurately describe the technologies that would be built, and population proportion is the right way to decide how much of the world's reserves Europe can count on.

What would settle it

New data showing that the actual material requirements per unit of installed capacity for the modelled technologies are substantially lower than the intensities used in the ex-post calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12201 by Heidi Heinrichs, Jan Mutke, Jonas Finke, Katharina Esser.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Capacity expansion of six energy technologies across 59 highly decarbonised Euro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies. Above 100% indicate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies without (”neglected”) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies with varying techno [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Literature review process based on the PRISMA guidelines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies with population-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies in the reference case, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Decarbonising energy systems reduces emissions and fossil fuel dependency, but expanding renewables increases demands for critical raw materials. Most energy system models, however, neglect material demands, putting the material feasibility of energy scenarios at question. We combine a systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies with a quantitative ex-post assessment of material demands for 5 key technologies and 19 materials. We find that material demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for seven materials (Ga, In, Ir, Te; less pronounced for Ag, Se, V), in particular if multiple sectors of the energy system are considered. Competing non-energy demand further amplifies the scarcity, while technological innovation can either alleviate or intensify it. We conclude that energy efficiency, recycling, expanding reserves and technological innovation may only partly address the identified shortages and call for energy sufficiency measures to achieve sustainability in the energy-material nexus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper conducts a systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies, performs an ex-post quantitative assessment of material demands for 5 key technologies and 19 materials, and concludes that these demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for seven materials (Ga, In, Ir, Te; less pronounced for Ag, Se, V), especially when multiple sectors are considered. It further notes that competing non-energy demand amplifies scarcity while innovation can alleviate or intensify it, and calls for energy sufficiency measures.

Significance. If the population-based allocation metric is accepted as appropriate, the findings would indicate material constraints that could limit the feasibility of many published European decarbonization pathways, strengthening the case for integrating material limits into energy system modeling. The systematic review of 59 studies supplies a broad evidence base, and the ex-post approach enables cross-model comparison; these are clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and implied Methods: the central claim that demands 'exceed' Europe's population-based shares of global reserves for Ga, In, Ir, Te (and less so Ag, Se, V) is load-bearing on the choice of population proportion as the allocation metric, yet no justification is supplied for why this demographic share is the correct benchmark for material feasibility when global supply is determined by markets, contracts, and extraction economics rather than fixed population allocations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ex-post material demand calculations for the 59 studies are presented without visible error bars, sensitivity checks on material intensities, or details on study selection criteria and intensity derivation; this directly affects whether the seven-material exceedance result is robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title 'Materealistic?' is informal for a journal submission; a more descriptive title would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for the 19 materials and 5 technologies should be defined explicitly in a table or methods subsection to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and propose revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied Methods: the central claim that demands 'exceed' Europe's population-based shares of global reserves for Ga, In, Ir, Te (and less so Ag, Se, V) is load-bearing on the choice of population proportion as the allocation metric, yet no justification is supplied for why this demographic share is the correct benchmark for material feasibility when global supply is determined by markets, contracts, and extraction economics rather than fixed population allocations.

    Authors: We agree that the choice of allocation metric requires explicit justification. The population-based share is employed as a normative benchmark to evaluate the equity of material demands under a fair per-capita distribution of global reserves, which is pertinent for assessing the global sustainability implications of European energy scenarios. This approach is common in studies of resource equity and planetary boundaries. We will add a subsection in the Methods explaining this rationale, supported by relevant citations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the ex-post material demand calculations for the 59 studies are presented without visible error bars, sensitivity checks on material intensities, or details on study selection criteria and intensity derivation; this directly affects whether the seven-material exceedance result is robust.

    Authors: The study selection criteria are detailed in Section 2 following the PRISMA framework, and material intensity data sources are described in Section 3 with values provided in the supplementary information. However, we acknowledge the absence of explicit sensitivity analyses and error bars in the main results. We will incorporate sensitivity checks on key material intensities and report uncertainty ranges in the revised manuscript to enhance the robustness assessment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ex-post comparison uses independent external data

full rationale

The paper conducts a systematic review of 59 external studies and performs ex-post material demand calculations using published model outputs and global reserve data. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation. The exceedance findings for Ga, In, Ir, Te and others are obtained by direct comparison to population-based reserve shares without reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction. The allocation metric choice is a modeling assumption open to critique but does not create circularity under the defined patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external global reserve statistics and technology-specific material intensity coefficients taken from prior literature; the paper adds the aggregation step across the 59 models. No new physical constants or entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • population-based allocation fraction
    The decision to allocate global reserves to Europe according to population share is a normative modeling choice rather than a derived quantity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Current published global reserve figures are accurate and stable benchmarks for comparison
    Invoked when comparing modelled demands against 'current global reserves' (abstract).
  • domain assumption Material intensity coefficients for the five key technologies are representative and transferable across the 59 studies
    Required for the uniform ex-post assessment described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1388 out tokens · 25239 ms · 2026-06-27T07:37:10.328816+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025

    International Energy Agency. Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. Tech. Rep. IEA Paris (2025). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Schulze, K., Heinrichs, H., Weinand, J.M., and Stolten, D. (2024). From fossil fuels to metals and minerals: Navigating global resource challenges in the energy transition. Cell Reports Sustainability1, 100239. doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100239

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100239 2024

  3. [3]

    European Parliament (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020Text with EEA relevance. . URL: https://eur-lex.europ...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Berthet, E., Lavalley, J., Anquetil-Deck, C., Ballesteros, F ., Stadler, K., Soytas, U., Hauschild, M., and Laurent, A. (2024). Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Global Environmental Change86, 102841. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841 2024

  5. [5]

    Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU – A foresight study

    Carrara, S., Bobba, S., Blagoeva, D., Alves Dias, P ., Cavalli, A., Georgitzikis, K., Grohol, M., Itul, A., Kuzov, T., Latunussa, C., Lyons, L., Malano, G., Maury, T., Prior Arce, ´A., Somers, J., Telsnig, T., Veeh, C., Wittmer, D., Black, C., Pennington, D., Christou, M. Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sec...

    work page doi:10.2760/386650 2023

  6. [6]

    The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions

    International Energy Agency. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. World Energy Outlook Special Report Interna- tional Energy Agency Paris (2021). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions. 21

    2021

  7. [7]

    Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report

    European Commission (2023). Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report. LU: Publications Office. URL:https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/725585

    work page doi:10.2873/725585 2023

  8. [8]

    Critical Materials Assessment

    Bauer, D.J., Smith, B.J., and Nguyen, R.T. Critical Materials Assessment. Technical Re- port U.S. Department of Energy (2023). URL:https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2023-07/doe-critical-material-assessment_07312023.pdf

    2023

  9. [9]

    UK 2024 critical- ity assessment

    Mudd, G., Josso, P ., Shaw, R., Luce, A., Singh, N., Horn, S., Bide, T., Currie, D., Elliott, H., Grant, H., Halkes, R., Idoine, N., Mitchell, C., Price, F ., and Petavratzi, E. UK 2024 critical- ity assessment. Open Report OR/24/047 British Geological Survey (2024). URL:https: //www.ukcmic.org/downloads/reports/ukcmic-2024-criticality-assessment.pdf

    2024

  10. [10]

    Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., and Keirstead, J. (2014). Energy systems modeling for twenty- first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews33, 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 2014

  11. [11]

    Vai, A., Colucci, G., Nicoli, M., and Savoldi, L. (2025). May the availability of critical raw materials affect the security of energy systems? An analysis for risk-aware energy plan- ning with TEMOA-Italy. Materials Today Energy48, 101805. doi:10.1016/j.mtener. 2025.101805

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtener 2025

  12. [12]

    Colucci, G., Finke, J., Bertsch, V., Di Cosmo, V., and Savoldi, L. (2025). Combined assess- ment of material and energy supply risks in the energy transition: A multi-objective energy system optimization approach. Applied Energy388, 125647. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2025.125647

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy 2025

  13. [13]

    Rauner, S., and Budzinski, M. (2017). Holistic energy system modeling combining multi- objective optimization and life cycle assessment. Environmental Research Letters12, 124005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa914d

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa914d 2017

  14. [14]

    Tokimatsu, K., Wachtmeister, H., McLellan, B., Davidsson, S., Murakami, S., H¨o¨ok, M., Y a- suoka, R., and Nishio, M. (2017). Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: A first look at metal requirements and the 2 ◦C target. Applied Energy207, 494–

    2017

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.151. 22

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.151 2017

  16. [16]

    Tokimatsu, K., H ¨o¨ok, M., McLellan, B., Wachtmeister, H., Murakami, S., Y asuoka, R., and Nishio, M. (2018). Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: Exploring metal requirements and the well-below 2 ◦C target with 100 percent renewable energy. Applied Energy225, 1158–1175. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.047 2018

  17. [17]

    Brown, T., H ¨orsch, J., and Schlachtberger, D. (2018). PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis. Journal of Open Research Software6, 4. doi:10.5334/jors.188

    work page doi:10.5334/jors.188 2018

  18. [18]

    Pfenninger, S., and Pickering, B. (2018). Calliope: A multi-scale energy systems modelling framework. Journal of Open Source Software3, 825. doi:10.21105/joss.00825

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00825 2018

  19. [20]

    Martin, N., Talens-Peir ´o, L., Villalba-M´endez, G., Nebot-Medina, R., and Madrid-L´opez, C. (2023). An energy future beyond climate neutrality: Comprehensive evaluations of transi- tion pathways. Applied Energy331, 120366. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120366

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120366 2023

  20. [21]

    Junne, T., Simon, S., Buchgeister, J., Saiger, M., Baumann, M., Haase, M., Wulf, C., and Naegler, T. (2020). Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany. Sus- tainability12, 8225. doi:10.3390/su12198225

    work page doi:10.3390/su12198225 2020

  21. [22]

    Fuss, M., and Xu, L. (2021). Unintended Environmental Impacts at Local and Global Scale—Trade-Offs of a Low-Carbon Electricity System. In D. M ¨ost, S. Schreiber, A. Herbst, M. Jakob, A. Martino, and W.R. Poganietz, eds. The Future European Energy System pp. 237–255.. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-030-60913-9 978-3-030-60914-6 pp. 23...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60914-6_13 2021

  22. [23]

    Moreau, V., Dos Reis, P .C., and Vuille, F . (2019). Enough Metals? Resource Con- straints to Supply a Fully Renewable Energy System. Resources8, 29. doi:10.3390/ resources8010029. 23

    2019

  23. [24]

    Schlichenmaier, S., and Naegler, T. (2022). May material bottlenecks hamper the global energy transition towards the 1.5 ◦C target? Energy Reports8, 14875–14887. doi:10. 1016/j.egyr.2022.11.025

    2022

  24. [25]

    Koljonen, T., Lehtil ¨a, A., Kiviranta, K., Koponen, K., and Simil ¨a, L. (2024). Modelling of demands of selected minerals and metals in clean energy transition with 1.5–2.0 ◦C mit- igation targets. In M. Labriet, K. Espegren, G. Giannakidis, and B. ´O Gallach ´oir, eds. Aligning the Energy Transition with the Sustainable Development Goals: Key Insights ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58897-6_10 2024

  25. [26]

    Schulze, K., Kullmann, F ., Weinand, J.M., and Stolten, D. (2024). Overcoming the chal- lenges of assessing the global raw material demand of future energy systems. Joule8, 1936–1957. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.016 2024

  26. [27]

    Montana, F ., Cellura, M., Silvestre, M.L.D., Longo, S., Luu, L.Q., Sanseverino, E.R., and Scium`e, G. (2024). Assessing Critical Raw Materials and Their Supply Risk in Energy Technologies—A Literature Review. Energies18. doi:10.3390/en18010086

    work page doi:10.3390/en18010086 2024

  27. [28]

    Wortmann, B., Stolten, D., and Heinrichs, H. (2025). Critical Iridium Demands arising from future Expansion of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis. arXiv. doi:10.48550/ ARXIV.2509.05357

    arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    Critical materials: Batteries for electric vehicles

    IRENA. Critical materials: Batteries for electric vehicles. Tech. Rep. International Renew- able Energy Agency Abu Dhabi (2024). URL:https://www.irena.org/Publications/ 2024/Sep/Critical-materials-Batteries-for-electric-vehicles

    2024

  29. [30]

    Material requirements for electricity grids

    Nohl, L., Finck, R., Magnani, N., Volkanovski, A., Black, C., and Tzimas, E. Material requirements for electricity grids. Tech. Rep. JRC143190 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2025). URL:https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/ handle/JRC143190

    2025

  30. [31]

    Smart Is Not Smart Enough!

    David, M., and Koch, F . (2019). “Smart Is Not Smart Enough!” Anticipating Critical Raw Material Use in Smart City Concepts: The Example of Smart Grids. Sustainability11,

    2019

  31. [32]

    doi:10.3390/su11164422. 24

    work page doi:10.3390/su11164422

  32. [33]

    Strategy of the Enough

    Michaelis, J., Vogel, B., Strunz, S., Lucht, W., Dahms, H., Dornack, C., Geissler, A., Hertin, J., Hoffart, F ., Kemfert, C., Klein, M., K¨ock, W., Lage, J., Marquard, E., Schmalz, S., Set- tele, J., Sommer, B., Weiss, S., and Wiegand, S. (2024). Sufficiency as a “Strategy of the Enough”: Curbing ecological crises and injustices. A summary of the German A...

    work page doi:10.14512/gaia.33.3.3 2024

  33. [34]

    Wiese, F ., Taillard, N., Balembois, E., Best, B., Bourgeois, S., Campos, J., Cordroch, L., Djelali, M., Gabert, A., Jacob, A., Johnson, E., Meyer, S., Munk ´acsy, B., Pagliano, L., Quoilin, S., Roscetti, A., Thema, J., Thiran, P ., Toledano, A., Vogel, B., Zell-Ziegler, C., and Marignac, Y . (2024). The key role of sufficiency for low demand-based carbon...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53393-0 2024

  34. [35]

    Nitsch, F ., Wetzel, M., Gils, H.C., and Nienhaus, K. (2024). The future role of Carnot batteries in Central Europe: Combining energy system and market perspective. Journal of Energy Storage85, 110959. doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.110959

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.110959 2024

  35. [36]

    Recycling of Critical Minerals

    International Energy Agency. Recycling of Critical Minerals. A World Energy Outlook Special Report IEA Paris (2024). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ recycling-of-critical-minerals

    2024

  36. [37]

    Geological Survey

    U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2026. Tech. Rep. USGS (2026). doi:10.3133/mcs2026

    work page doi:10.3133/mcs2026 2026

  37. [38]

    Buarque Andrade, L., Frenzel, M., Bookhagen, B., Kresse, C., Schmidt, M., Nassar, N., Alonso, E., Shojaeddini, E., and Sandmann, D. (2024). From exploration to production: Understanding the development dynamics of lithium mining projects. Resources Policy 99, 105423. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105423

    work page doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105423 2024

  38. [39]

    Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P .M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hr ´objartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P ., and...

    work page doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 2021

  39. [40]

    Scopus Database

    Elsevier (2026). Scopus Database. . URL:https://www.scopus.com

    2026

  40. [41]

    Bertsch, V., Finke, J., Esser, K., Plaga, L.S., Mersch, M., Stelzer, J., Atakan, B., Fichtner, W., Markides, C.N., and Sioshansi, R. (2025). How can energy-system mod- els inform technology development? Insights for emerging energy-storage technolo- gies. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems173, 111360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111360

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111360 2025

  41. [42]

    Pedersen, T.T., Gøtske, E.K., Dvorak, A., Andresen, G.B., and Victoria, M. (2022). Long- term implications of reduced gas imports on the decarbonization of the European energy system. Joule6, 1566–1580. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.023 2022

  42. [43]

    Rahdan, P ., Zeyen, E., and Victoria, M. (2025). Strategic deployment of solar photovoltaics for achieving self-sufficiency in Europe throughout the energy transition. Nature Commu- nications16, 6259. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61492-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61492-9 2025

  43. [44]

    Zeyen, E., Victoria, M., and Brown, T. (2023). Endogenous learning for green hydrogen in a sector-coupled energy model for Europe. Nature Communications14, 3743. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39397-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39397-2 2023

  44. [45]

    Rahdan, P ., Zeyen, E., Gallego-Castillo, C., and Victoria, M. (2024). Distributed photo- voltaics provides key benefits for a highly renewable European energy system. Applied Energy360, 122721. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122721 2024

  45. [46]

    Gøtske, E.K., Andresen, G.B., Neumann, F ., and Victoria, M. (2024). Designing a sector- coupled European energy system robust to 60 years of historical weather data. Nature Communications15, 10680. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54853-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54853-3 2024

  46. [47]

    Neumann, F ., Zeyen, E., Victoria, M., and Brown, T. (2023). The potential role of a hydro- gen network in Europe. Joule7, 1793–1817. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.016 2023

  47. [48]

    Pickering, B., Lombardi, F ., and Pfenninger, S. (2022). Diversity of options to eliminate 26 fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule 6, 1253–1276. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.009 2022

  48. [49]

    Lux, B., and Pfluger, B. (2020). A supply curve of electricity-based hydrogen in a decarbonized European energy system in 2050. Applied Energy269, 115011. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115011 2020

  49. [50]

    Wu, F ., Muller, A., and Pfenninger, S. (2023). Strategic uses for ancillary bioenergy in a carbon-neutral and fossil-free 2050 European energy system. Environmental Research Letters18, 014019. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca9e1

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca9e1 2023

  50. [51]

    Bussar, C., St ¨ocker, P ., Cai, Z., Moraes Jr., L., Magnor, D., Wiernes, P ., Bracht, N.V., Moser, A., and Sauer, D.U. (2016). Large-scale integration of renewable energies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050—Sensitivity study. Journal of Energy Storage6, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004 2016

  51. [52]

    Morales-Espa ˜na, G., Hern ´andez-Serna, R., Tejada-Arango, D.A., and Weeda, M. (2024). Impact of large-scale hydrogen electrification and retrofitting of natural gas infrastructure on the European power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Sys- tems155, 109686. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109686

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109686 2024

  52. [53]

    Gawlick, J., and Hamacher, T. (2023). Impact of coupling the electricity and hydrogen sector in a zero-emission European energy system in 2050. Energy Policy180, 113646. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113646

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113646 2023

  53. [54]

    Akhmetov, Y ., Fedotova, E., and Frysztacki, M.M. (2025). Flattening the peak demand curve through energy efficient buildings: A holistic approach towards net-zero carbon. Applied Energy384, 125421. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125421

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125421 2025

  54. [55]

    Victoria, M., Zhu, K., Brown, T., Andresen, G.B., and Greiner, M. (2020). Early decarbon- isation of the European energy system pays off. Nature Communications11, 6223. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20015-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20015-4 2020

  55. [56]

    Aliasghari, P ., G¨oke, L., and Egging-Bratseth, R. (2025). The potential of electrified trans- 27 port for enhancing flexibility in integrated renewable energy systems. Energy Reports13, 3379–3401. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.03.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.03.002 2025

  56. [57]

    Dunkel, P ., Kl ¨utz, T., Linßen, J., and Stolten, D. (2025). Towards Hydrogen Autarky? Evaluating Import Costs and Domestic Competitiveness in European Energy Strategies. arXiv. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.04669

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04669 2025

  57. [58]

    Kern, T., and Kigle, S. (2022). Modeling and evaluating bidirectionally chargeable electric vehicles in the future European energy system. Energy Reports8, 694–708. doi:10. 1016/j.egyr.2022.10.277

    2022

  58. [59]

    Johanndeiter, S., Helist ¨o, N., Kiviluoma, J., and Bertsch, V. (2024). Price Formation and Intersectoral Distributional Effects in a Fully Decarbonised European Electricity Market. SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4887442

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4887442 2024

  59. [60]

    Blumberg, G., Broll, R., and Weber, C. (2022). The impact of electric vehicles on the future European electricity system – A scenario analysis. Energy Policy161, 112751. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112751

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112751 2022

  60. [61]

    Johanndeiter, S., Helist ¨o, N., and Bertsch, V. (2025). Does the difference make a differ- ence? Evaluating Contracts for Difference design in a fully decarbonised European elec- tricity market. Resource and Energy Economics83, 101495. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco. 2025.101495

    work page doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco 2025

  61. [62]

    Seck, G.S., Hache, E., Sabathier, J., Guedes, F ., Reigstad, G.A., Straus, J., Wolfgang, O., Ouassou, J.A., Askeland, M., Hjorth, I., Skjelbred, H.I., Andersson, L.E., Douguet, S., Villavicencio, M., Tr ¨uby, J., Brauer, J., and Cabot, C. (2022). Hydrogen and the de- carbonization of the energy system in europe in 2050: A detailed model-based analysis. Re...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022 2022

  62. [63]

    Misconel, S., Z ¨ophel, C., and M ¨ost, D. (2021). Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system – A large-scale model application. Applied Energy299, 117326. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117326. 28

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117326 2021

  63. [64]

    Dom ´ınguez, R., Vitali, S., Carri ´on, M., and Moriggia, V. (2021). Analysing decarboniz- ing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints. Energy Economics101, 105438. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105438

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105438 2021

  64. [65]

    Child, M., Kemfert, C., Bogdanov, D., and Breyer, C. (2019). Flexible electricity genera- tion, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. Renewable Energy139, 80–101. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.077 2019

  65. [66]

    Pleßmann, G., and Blechinger, P . (2017). How to meet EU GHG emission reduction tar- gets? A model based decarbonization pathway for Europe’s electricity supply system until

    2017

  66. [67]

    doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003

    Energy Strategy Reviews15, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003 2016

  67. [68]

    Yueksel-Erguen, I., Most, D., Wyrwoll, L., Schmitt, C., and Zittel, J. (2025). Model- ing the transition of the multimodal pan-European energy system including an inte- grated analysis of electricity and gas transport. Energy Systems16, 1187–1232. doi: 10.1007/s12667-023-00637-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s12667-023-00637-5 2025

  68. [69]

    Zhu, K., Victoria, M., Brown, T., Andresen, G., and Greiner, M. (2019). Impact of CO2 prices on the design of a highly decarbonised coupled electricity and heating system in Europe. Applied Energy236, 622–634. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.016 2019

  69. [70]

    H ¨artel, P ., and Korp˚as, M. (2017). Aggregation Methods for Modelling Hydropower and Its Implications for a Highly Decarbonised Energy System in Europe. Energies10, 1841. doi: 10.3390/en10111841

    work page doi:10.3390/en10111841 2017

  70. [71]

    Junne, T., Cao, K.K., Miskiw, K.K., Hottenroth, H., and Naegler, T. (2021). Considering Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Power System Expansion Planning for Europe and North Africa Using Multi-Objective Optimization. Energies14, 1301. doi:10.3390/ en14051301

    2021

  71. [72]

    Heggarty, T., Bourmaud, J.Y ., Girard, R., and Kariniotakis, G. (2024). Assessing the rela- tive impacts of maximum investment rate and temporal detail in capacity expansion models applied to power systems. Energy290, 130231. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.130231. 29

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.130231 2024

  72. [73]

    Helgeson, B., and Peter, J. (2020). The role of electricity in decarbonizing European road transport – Development and assessment of an integrated multi-sectoral model. Applied Energy262, 114365. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114365

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114365 2020

  73. [74]

    Backe, S., Skar, C., Del Granado, P .C., Turgut, O., and Tomasgard, A. (2022). EMPIRE: An open-source model based on multi-horizon programming for energy transition analyses. SoftwareX17, 100877. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100877

    work page doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100877 2022

  74. [75]

    Caglayan, D.G., Heinrichs, H.U., Robinius, M., and Stolten, D. (2021). Robust design of a future 100% renewable european energy supply system with hydrogen infrastructure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy46, 29376–29390. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene. 2020.12.197

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene 2021

  75. [76]

    Mutke, J., Plaga, L.S., and Bertsch, V. (2023). Influence of bioenergy and transmission ex- pansion on electrical energy storage requirements in a gradually decarbonized European power system. Journal of Cleaner Production419, 138133. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2023.138133

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro 2023

  76. [77]

    B ´eres, R., Van Der Wel, A., Fattahi, A., and Van Den Broek, M. (2024). The impact of national policies on Europe-wide power system transition towards net-zero 2050. Energy 310, 133216. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133216

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133216 2024

  77. [78]

    Van Greevenbroek, K., Grochowicz, A., Zeyringer, M., and Benth, F .E. (2025). Trading off regional and overall energy system design flexibility in the net-zero transition. Nature Sustainability8, 629–641. doi:10.1038/s41893-025-01556-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-025-01556-2 2025

  78. [79]

    Sasanpour, S., Cao, K.K., Gils, H.C., and Jochem, P . (2021). Strategic policy targets and the contribution of hydrogen in a 100% renewable European power system. Energy Re- ports7, 4595–4608. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.005 2021

  79. [80]

    Pedersen, T.T., Victoria, M., Rasmussen, M.G., and Andresen, G.B. (2021). Modeling all alternative solutions for highly renewable energy systems. Energy234, 121294. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121294. 30

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121294 2021

  80. [81]

    Mara ˜n´on-Ledesma, H., and Tomasgard, A. (2019). Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market. Energies12, 2976. doi:10.3390/en12152976

    work page doi:10.3390/en12152976 2019

Showing first 80 references.