pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12233 · v1 · pith:AHORPSB2new · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ physics.optics

On-chip measurement of the modal Stokes-Gell-Mann parameters for partially coherent three-mode light

Amin Hashemi , Abbas Shiri , Bahaa E. A. Saleh , Andrea Blanco-Redondo , Ayman F. Abouraddy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords Stokes-Gell-Mann parameterspartially coherent lightthree-mode optical fieldsphotonic integrated circuitsMach-Zehnder interferometerscoherence matrix reconstructionon-chip measurementiso-entropy fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers on a photonic chip measures the eight Stokes-Gell-Mann parameters for partially coherent three-mode light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates the first on-chip measurements of the Stokes-Gell-Mann parameters, which characterize the 3x3 coherence matrix of optical fields spanning three modes. These parameters extend the well-known Stokes parameters from two to three modes using the Gell-Mann matrices. A reader would care because this capability allows full characterization of multimode partially coherent light, which is relevant for applications like optical communications and sensing where two-mode descriptions fall short. The measurements enable distinguishing iso-entropy fields that can be unitarily interconverted from those that cannot.

Core claim

The SGM parameters are measured directly in a photonic integrated platform, from which the 3x3 coherence matrix is reconstructed. This facilitates exploring the full space of iso-entropy fields that can be inter-converted into each other unitarily, and those that share the same value of entropy and yet cannot be inter-converted unitarily.

What carries the argument

The hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers, which performs the measurements needed to extract the eight SGM parameters from the three-mode field.

If this is right

  • The 3x3 coherence matrix for three-mode partially coherent light can be reconstructed from the SGM parameters.
  • Fields with the same entropy can be classified based on whether they are unitarily interconvertible.
  • Multimode partially coherent light becomes usable in optical communications, sensing, and information processing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This on-chip approach might be scaled to characterize fields with more than three modes.
  • Similar meshes could enable real-time monitoring of coherence in integrated photonic systems.
  • The technique opens possibilities for using SGM parameters in quantum optics protocols involving partial coherence.

Load-bearing premise

The hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers can be calibrated and operated without significant systematic errors or mode crosstalk to directly extract the eight SGM parameters.

What would settle it

Independent verification of the coherence matrix elements through a different method, such as direct correlation measurements, that disagrees with the matrix reconstructed from the SGM parameters would falsify the measurement validity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12233 by Abbas Shiri, Amin Hashemi, Andrea Blanco-Redondo, Ayman F. Abouraddy, Bahaa E. A. Saleh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Layout of the hexagonal mesh of MZIs in the photonic integrated circuit used in our experiments. Each gray rectangle is an MZI, and the connecting lines are on-chip single-mode waveguides. The solid rectangle highlights a single MZI whose structure is elucidated in (b), and a dashed rectangle highlights a portion of the circuit that corresponds to a general 2 × 2 unitary (e.g., the restricted unitary i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) A general 3 × 3 unitary is constructed out of a se￾quence of 2 × 2 unitaries Uˆ 12, Uˆ 23, and Uˆ 13, each operating on a pair of modes, in addition to introducing phases to each of the modes. (b) On-chip layout corresponding to the general 3 × 3 unitary in (a). 3. UNITARIES ON THREE-MODE LIGHT After tuning the field entropy S by changing the eigenvalues of the input coherence matrix Go = diag{ 1 3 , 1… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Configurations to measure the SGM parameters. Under each conceptual scheme we plot the corresponding layout of the modal paths in the on-chip MZI mesh. The paths followed by the modes are highlighted in different colors. The dashed rectangle in the lower panel identifies the portion of the integrated circuit corresponding to the 2 × 2 unitary depicted in the upper panel. (a) The SGM parameters s0, s3, and … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Iso-entropy fields. (a) The surface of the highlighted triangle in {λ1 , λ2, λ3}-space represents all physically realizable, par￾tially coherent three-mode optical fields described by a 3 × 3 coherence matrix. Each point on the triangle represents a family of iso-entropy coherence matrices that can be inter-converted to each other unitarily. (b) An exploded view of the triangle in (a): the vertices corresp… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Values of S computed from reconstructed coherence matrices after measuring the modal SGM parameters. We plot the data with respect to λ1 and λ2 along with the theoretical surface. The coherence matrices correspond to iso-entropy fields with S = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 bits. We project the data onto the ground plane and compare to theoretical iso-entropy curves. (b) Eigenvalues extracted from the reconstructe… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measurements of iso-entropy fields that are inter-converted into each other unitarily. We plot each measured coherence matrix G next to the theoretical counterpart. The three double columns correspond to three values of entropy: G1 having S = 0.5 bit (left); G2 having S = 1.0 bit (middle); and G3 having S = 1.5 bits (right). The initial coherence matrices are all diagonal and are given in Eq. 15. Each row … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Stokes parameters are three real parameters that completely characterize partially coherent optical fields spanned by two modes -- whether a pair of polarization or spatial modes -- and their use is thus ubiquitous in optics. Because the Stokes parameters are defined through an expansion of the $2\times2$ coherence matrix in terms of the Pauli matrices, they cannot be applied to optical fields comprising three modes, which are described by a $3\times3$ coherence matrix. Examples of such fields include the polarization of non-paraxial fields (spanned by three orthogonal polarization modes), and fields comprising three spatial or temporal modes. It has long been theorized that the $3\times3$ Gell-Mann matrices -- developed in high-energy particle physics -- can serve as a basis for $3\times3$ optical coherence matrices, with 8~expansion coefficients known as the Stokes-Gell-Mann (SGM) parameters, but the measurement procedure is daunting, and the SGM parameters have not been measured directly to date in optics. Here we present the first measurements of the SGM parameters for partially coherent three-mode light in a photonic integrated platform comprising a hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Measuring the SGM parameters on chip, from which we reconstruct the $3\times3$ coherence matrix facilitates exploring the full space of iso-entropy fields that can be inter-converted into each other unitarily, and those that share the same value of entropy and yet cannot be inter-converted unitarily. These results pave the way to utilizing multimode partially coherent light in applications involving optical communications, sensing, and information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to present the first on-chip measurements of the eight Stokes-Gell-Mann (SGM) parameters for partially coherent three-mode light, obtained via intensity measurements in a photonic integrated circuit consisting of a hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers. These measurements enable reconstruction of the full 3x3 coherence matrix and exploration of unitary equivalence classes among iso-entropy fields.

Significance. If the experimental results hold with adequate validation, the work provides a practical extension of the Stokes formalism to three-mode fields, which is relevant for non-paraxial polarization, multimode spatial or temporal fields. The on-chip platform could support applications in optical communications, sensing, and information processing by allowing direct access to the complete set of coherence parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (measurement procedure): The central claim that the hexagonal MZI mesh extracts all eight SGM parameters directly rests on the assumption that the device can be calibrated to isolate each Gell-Mann component without significant systematic errors, loss imbalances, or inter-mode crosstalk. No quantitative error budget, calibration protocol, or post-calibration verification of linear independence is supplied, which is load-bearing for the accuracy of the reconstructed coherence matrix.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and results: The abstract asserts the first measurements but supplies no data, error bars, or cross-checks against independent methods or known limiting cases (e.g., fully coherent or incoherent fields). Without these, the support for the experimental claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by a concise statement of the achieved measurement precision or representative SGM values obtained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (measurement procedure): The central claim that the hexagonal MZI mesh extracts all eight SGM parameters directly rests on the assumption that the device can be calibrated to isolate each Gell-Mann component without significant systematic errors, loss imbalances, or inter-mode crosstalk. No quantitative error budget, calibration protocol, or post-calibration verification of linear independence is supplied, which is load-bearing for the accuracy of the reconstructed coherence matrix.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative error budget, explicit calibration protocol, and verification of linear independence are essential to support the central claim. Although the manuscript describes the device operation and measurement procedure, we acknowledge these specific elements were not provided in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection on calibration, including a quantitative error budget for loss imbalances and crosstalk together with post-calibration checks confirming linear independence of the extracted Gell-Mann components. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results: The abstract asserts the first measurements but supplies no data, error bars, or cross-checks against independent methods or known limiting cases (e.g., fully coherent or incoherent fields). Without these, the support for the experimental claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: Abstracts are concise summaries and do not normally contain raw data or error bars. The main text and figures present the measured SGM parameters with error bars and include explicit cross-checks against the limiting cases of fully coherent and fully incoherent three-mode fields. To better anchor the abstract claim, we will add a short clause referencing these validations while remaining within length constraints. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurement report with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting the first on-chip measurements of the eight Stokes-Gell-Mann parameters for three-mode partially coherent light using a hexagonal mesh of Mach-Zehnder interferometers. The central claim rests on device calibration and intensity measurements to reconstruct the 3x3 coherence matrix, not on any theoretical derivation that reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. No equations or procedures are presented as 'predictions' that loop back to the measurement protocol itself. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks of optical coherence matrix reconstruction and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior self-work in a load-bearing manner.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions from quantum optics regarding coherence matrices and unitary transformations. No new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The coherence matrix for three-mode fields can be expanded using the eight Gell-Mann matrices to yield the SGM parameters.
    This is the theoretical foundation mentioned in the abstract for extending from 2-mode Stokes to 3-mode SGM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5843 in / 1361 out tokens · 28046 ms · 2026-06-27T08:37:41.542073+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Encoding information in the mutual coherence of spatially separated light beams,

    A. Nardi, S. Divitt, M. Rossi,et al., “Encoding information in the mutual coherence of spatially separated light beams,” Opt. Lett.47, 4588–4591 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Op- tical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank,

    M. Harling, C. Stevenson, K. C. Toussaint, and A. F . Abouraddy, “Op- tical communications through highly scattering channels using the coherence-rank,” APL Photonics10, 076116 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Partial coher- ence enhances parallelized photonic computing,

    B. Dong, F . Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, L. Meyer,et al., “Partial coher- ence enhances parallelized photonic computing,” Nature632, 55–62 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Optical coherence encryption with structured random light,

    D. Peng, Z. Huang, Y . Liu,et al., “Optical coherence encryption with structured random light,” PhotoniX2, 6 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Unlocking secure optical multiplexing with spatially incoherent light,

    X. Liu, X. Li, S. A. Ponomarenko,et al., “Unlocking secure optical multiplexing with spatially incoherent light,” Laser Photon. Rev.19, 2401534 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Universal programmable and self-configuring optical filter,

    D. A. B. Miller, C. Roques-Carmes, C. G. Valdez,et al., “Universal programmable and self-configuring optical filter,” Optica12, 1417–1426 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Matrix treatment of partial coherence,

    H. Gamo, “Matrix treatment of partial coherence,” Prog. Opt.3, 187– 332 (1964)

    1964

  8. [8]

    Coherence properties of optical fields,

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, “Coherence properties of optical fields,” Rev. Mod. Phys.37, 231–287 (1965)

    1965

  9. [9]

    Wolf,Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light(Cambridge Univ

    E. Wolf,Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light(Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    Phase-space measurement and coherence synthesis of optical beams,

    L. Waller, G. Situ, and J. W. Fleischer, “Phase-space measurement and coherence synthesis of optical beams,” Nat. Photon.6, 474–479 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Programmable photonic circuits,

    W. Bogaerts, D. Pérez, J. Capmany,et al., “Programmable photonic circuits,” Nature586, 207–216 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Measuring, processing, and generating partially coherent light with self-configuring optics,

    C. Roques-Carmes, S. Fan, and D. Miller, “Measuring, processing, and generating partially coherent light with self-configuring optics,” Light Sci. Appl.13, 260 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Programmable on-chip synthesis and reconstruction of partially coherent two-mode optical fields,

    A. Hashemi, A. Shiri, B. E. A. Saleh,et al., “Programmable on-chip synthesis and reconstruction of partially coherent two-mode optical fields,” arXiv:2601.09802 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    On-chip control of the coherence matrix of four-mode partially coherent light: rank, entropy, and modal stokes parameters,

    A. Hashemi, A. Shiri, B. E. A. Saleh,et al., “On-chip control of the coherence matrix of four-mode partially coherent light: rank, entropy, and modal stokes parameters,” arXiv:2601.18797 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Separating partially coherent light,

    P .-A. Mor, A. R. Kroo, C. G. Valdez,et al., “Separating partially coherent light,” arXiv:2603.15517 (2025). Research Article 9

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Two-point optical coherency matrix tomography,

    A. F . Abouraddy, K. H. Kagalwala, and B. E. A. Saleh, “Two-point optical coherency matrix tomography,” Opt. Lett.39, 2411–2414 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    Optical coherency matrix tomography,

    K. H. Kagalwala, H. E. Kondakci, A. F . Abouraddy, and B. E. A. Saleh, “Optical coherency matrix tomography,” Sci. Rep.5, 15333 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Locked entropy in partially coherent optical fields,

    M. Harling, V. A. Kelkar, K. C. Toussaint, and A. F . Abouraddy, “Locked entropy in partially coherent optical fields,” Phys. Rev. A109, L021501 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Isoen- tropic partially coherent optical fields that cannot be interconverted unitarily,

    M. Harling, V. A. Kelkar, K. C. Toussaint, and A. F . Abouraddy, “Isoen- tropic partially coherent optical fields that cannot be interconverted unitarily,” Phys. Rev. A110, 013505 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    SU(3) repre- sentation for the polarisation of light,

    G. Ramachandran, M. V. N. Murthy, and K. S. Mallesh, “SU(3) repre- sentation for the polarisation of light,” Pramana15, 357–369 (1980)

    1980

  21. [21]

    Parameters characteriz- ing electromagnetic wave polarization,

    T. Carozzi, R. Karlsson, and J. Bergman, “Parameters characteriz- ing electromagnetic wave polarization,” Phys. Rev. E61, 2024–2028 (2000)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Degree of polarization for optical near fields,

    T. Setälä, A. Shevchenko, M. Kaivola, and A. T. Friberg, “Degree of polarization for optical near fields,” Phys. Rev. E66, 016615 (2002)

    2002

  23. [23]

    Geometric interpretation of the three-dimensional co- herence matrix for nonparaxial polarization,

    M. R. Dennis, “Geometric interpretation of the three-dimensional co- herence matrix for nonparaxial polarization,” J. Opt. A6, S26–S31 (2004)

    2004

  24. [24]

    Degree of polar- ization of statistically stationary electromagnetic fields,

    J. Ellis, A. Dogariu, S. Ponomarenko, and E. Wolf, “Degree of polar- ization of statistically stationary electromagnetic fields,” Opt. Commun. 248, 333–337 (2005)

    2005

  25. [25]

    Optical polarimetry of random fields,

    J. Ellis and A. Dogariu, “Optical polarimetry of random fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 203905 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Three-dimensional polarization control in microscopy,

    A. F . Abouraddy and K. C. Toussaint, “Three-dimensional polarization control in microscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 153901 (2006)

    2006

  27. [27]

    Invariant polarimetric contrast parameters of light with Gaussian fluctuations in three dimensions,

    P . Réfrégier, M. Roche, and F . Goudail, “Invariant polarimetric contrast parameters of light with Gaussian fluctuations in three dimensions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A23, 124–133 (2006)

    2006

  28. [28]

    Partial polarization in three dimensions,

    C. J. R. Sheppard, “Partial polarization in three dimensions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A28, 2655–2659 (2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    Jones and Stokes parameters for polarization in three dimensions,

    C. J. R. Sheppard, “Jones and Stokes parameters for polarization in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. A90, 023809 (2014)

    2014

  30. [30]

    Three-dimensional polarization algebra,

    C. J. R. Sheppard, M. Castello, and A. Diaspro, “Three-dimensional polarization algebra,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A33, 1938–1947 (2016)

    1938

  31. [31]

    Structure of polari- metric purity of three-dimensional polarization states,

    J. J. Gil, A. T. Friberg, T. Set älä, and I. S. José, “Structure of polari- metric purity of three-dimensional polarization states,” Phys. Rev. A95, 053856 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Geometric descriptions for the polarization of nonparax- ial light: a tutorial,

    M. A. Alonso, “Geometric descriptions for the polarization of nonparax- ial light: a tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photon.15, 176–235 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Brosseau,Fundamentals of Polarized Light(Wiley, New Y ork, 1998)

    C. Brosseau,Fundamentals of Polarized Light(Wiley, New Y ork, 1998)

    1998

  34. [34]

    Symmetry properties and polarization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield,

    C. Brosseau and A. Dogariu, “Symmetry properties and polarization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield,” Prog. Opt.49, 315–380 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    Symmetries of baryons and mesons,

    M. Gell-Mann, “Symmetries of baryons and mesons,” Phys. Rev.125, 1067–1084 (1962)

    1962

  36. [36]

    3D Stokes polarimetric imaging at nanoscales,

    I. Herrera, M. A. Alonso, and S. Brasselet, “3D Stokes polarimetric imaging at nanoscales,” arXiv:2511.11222 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P . Bertani, “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,” Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58–61 (1994)

    1994

  38. [38]

    Comment on ‘polar- ization coherence theorem’,

    A. F . Abouraddy, A. Dogariu, and B. E. A. Saleh, “Comment on ‘polar- ization coherence theorem’,” Optica6, 829–830 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Poincaré sphere representa- tion of scalar two-beam interference under spatial unitary transforma- tions,

    A. Halder, A. Norrman, and A. T. Friberg, “Poincaré sphere representa- tion of scalar two-beam interference under spatial unitary transforma- tions,” Opt. Lett.46, 5619–5622 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    Optical cross-purity,

    A. F . Abouraddy and B. E. A. Saleh, “Optical cross-purity,” Opt. Lett.51, 833–836 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Fidelity for mixed quantum states,

    R. Jozsa, “Fidelity for mixed quantum states,” J. Mod. Opt.41, 2315– 2323 (1994)

    1994