pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17137 · v1 · pith:KLCF4UCKnew · submitted 2026-06-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.IM

Improving low-latency multi-messenger follow-up of neutron star-black hole mergers with mode-by-mode filtering

Francesco Iacovelli , Digvijay Wadekar , Javier Roulet , Emanuele Berti , Alessandra Corsi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 03:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords neutron star-black hole mergersgravitational-wave parameter estimationhigher-order modeslow-latency analysismulti-messenger astronomyLIGO-Virgo networkelectromagnetic follow-up
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mode-by-mode filtering of SNR time series lets low-latency NSBH analyses marginalize over higher-order modes at quadrupole-only cost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that filtering the signal-to-noise ratio time series separately for the (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4) modes allows rapid inclusion of higher-order mode effects in neutron star-black hole merger parameter estimation. Standard low-latency pipelines omit these modes and therefore suffer strong degeneracies among distance, inclination, and mass. The new filtering step performs the marginalization without a large increase in computation time. When applied to simulated LIGO-Virgo events at design sensitivity, the method tightens posterior constraints on luminosity distance, viewing angle, sky localization volume, and source-frame secondary mass. The same procedure applied to public data for GW190814 produces the largest gains for the most asymmetric, high-SNR case.

Core claim

Mode-by-mode filtering of the (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4) signal-to-noise-ratio time series enables low-latency marginalization over higher-order-mode information at a computational cost comparable to quadrupole-only analyses. Applied to simulated NSBH detections in a LIGO-Virgo network at design sensitivity, the method improves constraints on luminosity distance, viewing angle, localization volume, and source-frame secondary mass, sharpening estimates of electromagnetic detectability and host-galaxy association.

What carries the argument

mode-by-mode filtering of the (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4) SNR time series, which isolates each mode's contribution so that higher-mode information can be marginalized independently and at low extra cost.

If this is right

  • Tighter luminosity-distance and viewing-angle posteriors improve predictions of electromagnetic counterpart brightness.
  • Smaller localization volumes raise the chance of correct host-galaxy identification.
  • Better source-frame secondary-mass constraints help classify the remnant and decide follow-up strategy.
  • The largest gains appear for asymmetric, high-SNR events such as GW190814.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The filtering approach could be ported to other low-latency pipelines that currently discard higher modes.
  • Extending the same mode-by-mode treatment to binary-black-hole events with large mass ratios would test whether the computational saving holds more generally.
  • Combining the filtered SNR series with rapid sky-localization maps could shorten the time from alert to targeted telescope pointing.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-order modes can be filtered independently from the dominant mode in the low-latency regime without introducing significant biases or unaccounted correlations.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison, on the same set of simulated NSBH signals with known injected parameters, of the posterior distributions obtained with mode-by-mode filtering versus a full higher-mode waveform analysis, checking for systematic shifts in recovered distance or secondary mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17137 by Alessandra Corsi, Digvijay Wadekar, Emanuele Berti, Francesco Iacovelli, Javier Roulet.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Low-latency PE for a GW190814-like injected sig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The viewing/inclination angle Θ controls whether [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The source-frame secondary mass helps determine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In the main text, we tested our low-latency HM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Population-level one-dimensional summaries comple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rapid parameter estimation for neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers is essential for deciding whether, where, and how electromagnetic facilities should follow up gravitational-wave alerts. Current low-latency analyses typically use only the dominant quadrupole harmonic, leaving strong degeneracies among luminosity distance, inclination, and intrinsic binary parameters. We show that mode-by-mode filtering of the $(2,2)$, $(3,3)$, and $(4,4)$ signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) time series enables low-latency marginalization over higher-order-mode information at a computational cost comparable to quadrupole-only analyses. Applied to simulated NSBH detections in a LIGO-Virgo network at design sensitivity, our method improves constraints on luminosity distance, viewing angle, localization volume, and source-frame secondary mass, thereby sharpening crucial estimates of electromagnetic detectability and host-galaxy association. We also validate the approach on public data for previously detected NSBH events, finding the largest improvement for the asymmetric, higher-SNR event GW190814.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that mode-by-mode filtering of the (2,2), (3,3), and (4,4) SNR time series enables low-latency marginalization over higher-order-mode content for NSBH mergers at computational cost comparable to quadrupole-only analyses. Applied to simulated LIGO-Virgo detections, the approach improves constraints on luminosity distance, viewing angle, localization volume, and source-frame secondary mass; validation on public events (largest gain for GW190814) is also reported.

Significance. If the central claim holds without bias, the work would provide a practical advance for rapid multi-messenger follow-up by tightening low-latency posteriors relevant to EM detectability and host-galaxy association. The emphasis on computational parity and the use of both simulated and public data for validation are positive features.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and method description] Abstract (method description): the claim that independent filtering of the three SNR time series permits valid marginalization assumes negligible cross-mode correlations. Because all modes are generated by the same intrinsic/extrinsic parameters (mass ratio, inclination, distance), statistical coupling exists; the manuscript must demonstrate that the filtering step does not introduce bias in the reported improvements for asymmetric NSBH systems, e.g., via direct comparison with full higher-mode runs on the same injections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: quantitative measures of improvement (e.g., factor by which distance or mass uncertainties shrink, or changes in 90% localization volume) are absent; adding them would make the claimed gains concrete.
  2. [Validation paragraph] Validation paragraph: the abstract states validation on public events but supplies no details on implementation, error bars, or checks for filtering-induced biases; the full text should supply these.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment. We address the major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and method description] Abstract (method description): the claim that independent filtering of the three SNR time series permits valid marginalization assumes negligible cross-mode correlations. Because all modes are generated by the same intrinsic/extrinsic parameters (mass ratio, inclination, distance), statistical coupling exists; the manuscript must demonstrate that the filtering step does not introduce bias in the reported improvements for asymmetric NSBH systems, e.g., via direct comparison with full higher-mode runs on the same injections.

    Authors: We agree that the shared dependence on intrinsic and extrinsic parameters induces correlations among the modes. The mode-by-mode filtering operates on the SNR time series extracted independently for each harmonic from the data, allowing the low-latency pipeline to marginalize over mode content by combining per-mode likelihoods without recomputing full waveforms. To directly address the concern of possible bias in the reported improvements, particularly for asymmetric systems, we will add a comparison of the mode-by-mode results against full higher-mode parameter estimation on the same simulated injections. This validation will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method validated on external simulations and public data

full rationale

The provided abstract and text describe a mode-by-mode SNR filtering technique whose performance is assessed via application to simulated NSBH detections and public events (e.g., GW190814). No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce the central claims (computational cost parity, improved posteriors) to inputs by construction. The derivation chain relies on external benchmarks rather than tautological redefinitions or load-bearing self-references, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, new entities, or non-standard axioms are stated. The work implicitly relies on standard assumptions of general relativity and LIGO-Virgo noise models.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption General relativity accurately models the gravitational-wave emission from NSBH mergers including higher-order modes
    Standard background assumption in gravitational-wave astronomy invoked by any analysis of NSBH signals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1171 out tokens · 46236 ms · 2026-06-27T03:15:56.444293+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 45 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, et al.(KAGRA), Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013), arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2605.27225 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observa- tory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MAS- TER,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE, MASTER), Nature551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.970, L34 (2024), arXiv:2404.04248 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Olsen, T

    S. Olsen, T. Venumadhav, J. Mushkin, J. Roulet, B. Za- ckay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D106, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2201.02252 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Colomboet al., Astron

    A. Colomboet al., Astron. Astrophys.686, A265 (2024), arXiv:2310.16894 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Vitale and H.-Y

    S. Vitale and H.-Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 021303 (2018), arXiv:1804.07337 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    T. A. Clarke, L. Chastain, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J. Lett.949, L6 (2023), arXiv:2302.09711 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    F. S. Broekgaardenet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516, 5737 (2022), arXiv:2112.05763 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Gehrelset al.(Swift Science), Astrophys

    N. Gehrelset al.(Swift Science), Astrophys. J.611, 1005 (2004), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 621, 558 (2005)], arXiv:astro-ph/0405233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Shvartzvaldet al., Astrophys

    Y. Shvartzvaldet al., Astrophys. J.964, 74 (2024), arXiv:2304.14482 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Atteia, B

    J.-L. Atteia, B. Cordier, and J. Wei (SVOM), Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31, 2230008 (2022), arXiv:2203.10962 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Yuanet al.(Einstein Probe Team), PoSSWIFT10, 006 (2015), arXiv:1506.07735 [astro-ph.HE]

    W. Yuanet al.(Einstein Probe Team), PoSSWIFT10, 006 (2015), arXiv:1506.07735 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Anandet al., Nature Astron.5, 46 (2021), arXiv:2009.07210 [astro-ph.HE]

    S. Anandet al., Nature Astron.5, 46 (2021), arXiv:2009.07210 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Andreoniet al., Astrophys

    I. Andreoniet al., Astrophys. J. Supp.260, 18 (2022), arXiv:2111.01945 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    B. P. Gompertzet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 726 (2020), arXiv:2004.00025 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    D. A. Goldsteinet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.881, L7 (2019), arXiv:1905.06980 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Antieret al., Mon

    S. Antieret al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 5518 (2020), arXiv:2004.04277 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    S. S. Chaudharyet al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.121, e2316474121 (2024), arXiv:2308.04545 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Sachdevet al., (2019), arXiv:1901.08580 [gr-qc]

    S. Sachdevet al., (2019), arXiv:1901.08580 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    A. H. Nitz, T. Dal Canton, D. Davis, and S. Reyes, Phys. Rev. D98, 024050 (2018), arXiv:1805.11174 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Adams, D

    T. Adams, D. Buskulic, V. Germain, G. M. Guidi, et al., Class. Quant. Grav.33, 175012 (2016), arXiv:1512.02864 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Chuet al., Phys

    Q. Chuet al., Phys. Rev. D105, 024023 (2022), arXiv:2011.06787 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Villa-Ortega, T

    V. Villa-Ortega, T. Dent, and A. C. Barroso, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.515, 5718 (2022), [Er- ratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 535, 2503 (2024)], arXiv:2203.10080 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2605.27224 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    L. P. Singer and L. R. Price, Phys. Rev. D93, 024013 (2016), arXiv:1508.03634 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    L. P. Singeret al., Astrophys. J. Lett.829, L15 (2016), arXiv:1603.07333 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    L. P. Singeret al., Astrophys. J. Suppl.226, 10 (2016), arXiv:1605.04242 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Essick, S

    R. Essick, S. Vitale, E. Katsavounidis, G. Vedovato, and S. Klimenko, Astrophys. J.800, 81 (2015), arXiv:1409.2435 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Capano, Y

    C. Capano, Y. Pan, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D 89, 102003 (2014), arXiv:1311.1286 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Mills and S

    C. Mills and S. Fairhurst, Phys. Rev. D103, 024042 (2021), arXiv:2007.04313 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Fairhurst, C

    S. Fairhurst, C. Hoy, R. Green, C. Mills, and S. A. Usman, Phys. Rev. D108, 082006 (2023), arXiv:2304.03731 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Wadekar, J

    D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, A. K. Mehta, et al., (2023), arXiv:2312.06631 [gr-qc]. 12

    arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    S. Yi, F. Iacovelli, S. Marsat, D. Wadekar, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D112, 124063 (2025), arXiv:2502.12237 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    S. Yi, F. Iacovelli, E. Berti, R. S. Chandramouli, S. Marsat, D. Wadekar, and N. Yunes, (2026), arXiv:2602.09088 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    A. K. Mehta, D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, I. Anantpurkar, et al., (2025), arXiv:2501.17939 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    A. K. Mehta, D. Wadekar, I. Anantpurkar, J. Roulet,et al., Phys. Rev. D112, 124023 (2025), arXiv:2508.15350 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Wadekar, T

    D. Wadekar, T. Venumadhav, A. K. Mehta, J. Roulet,et al., Phys. Rev. D110, 084035 (2024), arXiv:2310.15233 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Chandra, J

    K. Chandra, J. Calder´ on Bustillo, A. Pai, and I. W. Harry, Phys. Rev. D106, 123003 (2022), arXiv:2207.01654 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Calder´ on Bustillo, S

    J. Calder´ on Bustillo, S. H. W. Leong, and K. Chandra, Nature Astron.9, 1530 (2025), arXiv:2211.03465 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Sinha, R

    P. Sinha, R. Prasad, M. K. Singh, P. Kumar, A. Maurya, and K. Paul, (2025), arXiv:2507.07021 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  54. [54]

    S. A. Usman, J. C. Mills, and S. Fairhurst, Astrophys. J.877, 82 (2019), arXiv:1809.10727 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Calder´ on Bustillo, S

    J. Calder´ on Bustillo, S. H. W. Leong, T. Dietrich, and P. D. Lasky, Astrophys. J. Lett.912, L10 (2021), arXiv:2006.11525 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Wadekar, T

    D. Wadekar, T. Venumadhav, J. Roulet, A. K. Mehta, B. Zackay, J. Mushkin, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D110, 044063 (2024), arXiv:2405.17400 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Roulet, J

    J. Roulet, J. Mushkin, D. Wadekar, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D110, 044010 (2024), arXiv:2404.02435 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Gehrels, J

    N. Gehrels, J. K. Cannizzo, J. Kanner, M. M. Kasliwal, S. Nissanke, and L. P. Singer, Astrophys. J.820, 136 (2016), arXiv:1508.03608 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Sarin, P

    N. Sarin, P. D. Lasky, F. H. Vivanco, S. P. Stevenson, D. Chattopadhyay, R. Smith, and E. Thrane, Phys. Rev. D105, 083004 (2022), arXiv:2201.08491 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    O. S. Salafia and G. Ghirlanda, Galaxies10, 93 (2022), arXiv:2206.11088 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    B. J. Morsony, R. D. L. Santos, R. Hernandez, J. Bus- tamante,et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.533, 510 (2024), arXiv:2306.00076 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    A. S. Carracedo, M. Bulla, U. Feindt, and A. Goo- bar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504, 1294 (2021), arXiv:2004.06137 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    E. A. Chase, B. O’Connor, C. L. Fryer, E. Troja,et al., Astrophys. J.927, 163 (2022), arXiv:2105.12268 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Andreoniet al., Astrophys

    I. Andreoniet al., Astrophys. J. Supp.258, 5 (2022), arXiv:2106.06820 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Andreoniet al., Astropart

    I. Andreoniet al., Astropart. Phys.155, 102904 (2024), arXiv:2307.09511 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Ahumadaet al., Publ

    T. Ahumadaet al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.136, 114201 (2024), arXiv:2405.12403 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Stevenson, A

    S. Stevenson, A. M¨ oller, and J. Powell, Astrophys. J. 998, 8 (2026), arXiv:2510.12932 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Foucart, T

    F. Foucart, T. Hinderer, and S. Nissanke, Phys. Rev. D98, 081501 (2018), arXiv:1807.00011 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Barbieri, O

    C. Barbieri, O. S. Salafia, A. Perego, M. Colpi, and G. Ghirlanda, Eur. Phys. J. A56, 8 (2020), arXiv:1908.08822 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    B. P. Gompertz, M. Nicholl, J. C. Smith, S. Harisankar, G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and G. P. Smith, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 4585 (2023), arXiv:2305.07582 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Biscoveanu, P

    S. Biscoveanu, P. Landry, and S. Vitale, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518, 5298 (2022), arXiv:2207.01568 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Madau and M

    P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.52, 415 (2014), arXiv:1403.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  73. [73]

    Madau and T

    P. Madau and T. Fragos, Astrophys. J.840, 39 (2017), arXiv:1606.07887 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Living Rev. Rel.19, 1 (2016), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Maggiore, Astrophys. J. Supp.263, 2 (2022), arXiv:2207.06910 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, M

    C. Garc´ ıa-Quir´ os, M. Colleoni, S. Husa, H. Es- tell´ es,et al., Phys. Rev. D102, 064002 (2020), arXiv:2001.10914 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, “LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite,” Free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  78. [78]

    It measures the signal’s strength compared to the noise level, not noise actually present in the data

    In a zero-noise injection, the SNR of an injected sig- nal is defined relative to the detector’s assumed noise power spectral density, even though no random noise realization is added. It measures the signal’s strength compared to the noise level, not noise actually present in the data

  79. [79]

    Ashtonet al., Astrophys

    G. Ashtonet al., Astrophys. J. Suppl.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    M. Dax, S. R. Green, J. Gair, J. H. Macke, A. Buo- nanno, and B. Sch¨ olkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 241103 (2021), arXiv:2106.12594 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.