pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17866 · v1 · pith:ELNOY4B5new · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Experimental Characterization and Modeling of Measurement-Induced State-Transitions in a Fluxonium Superconducting Qubit

Martijn F. S. Zwanenburg , Jinlun Hu , Eugene Y. Huang , Figen Yilmaz , Siddharth Singh , Christian Kraglund Andersen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords fluxonium qubitmeasurement-induced state transitionsMISTdispersive readoutsuperinductor array modesquantum non-demolition measurementsuperconducting qubit
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical model of measurement-induced state transitions in fluxonium qubits accurately predicts eleven regions of increased error across the full flux range by accounting for superinductor array modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures how strong readout drives cause a fluxonium qubit to leave its computational states at different external flux values. It then builds a numerical model that calculates the probability of these unwanted transitions, including both higher qubit levels and the transmission-line modes of the superinductor. The model matches the locations of eleven distinct regions where errors rise sharply in the experiment. This match shows that array modes must be included to correctly forecast when readout will disturb the qubit. The work therefore supplies a validated tool for choosing flux and drive settings that keep measurements closer to ideal quantum non-demolition behavior.

Core claim

The numerical calculation of measurement-induced state-transition rates, when it incorporates both transitions to higher fluxonium levels and transitions that involve the transmission-line-like array modes of the superinductor, accurately locates all eleven experimentally observed regions of elevated MIST error over the full external flux range.

What carries the argument

Numerical model of MIST rates that sums transition probabilities to higher fluxonium levels and to superinductor array modes under the applied readout drive.

If this is right

  • Readout drive strength can be increased at flux values outside the eleven regions without incurring extra state-transition errors.
  • Fluxonium designs must treat the superinductor as a multimode transmission line rather than a single inductor when predicting readout errors.
  • Avoiding the identified flux points during operation reduces the dominant source of non-QND errors in these qubits.
  • The same modeling approach can be used to screen new fluxonium parameters before fabrication.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that array-mode engineering could become a new design knob for lowering MIST in fluxonium devices.
  • If the model generalizes, similar array-mode contributions may appear in other superinductor-based qubits such as the 0-pi qubit.
  • Routine mapping of MIST versus flux could be added to qubit calibration routines to select optimal operating points.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical model includes every physical mechanism that can produce the observed MIST errors and the experimental scan has not been distorted by unmodeled noise or artifacts.

What would settle it

A measurement at one of the eleven predicted flux points that finds the MIST error rate remains low instead of rising as the model forecasts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17866 by Christian Kraglund Andersen, Eugene Y. Huang, Figen Yilmaz, Jinlun Hu, Martijn F. S. Zwanenburg, Siddharth Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Circuit diagram of the fluxonium with a ca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Unmodulated readout pulse and the net-zero flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Circuit diagram of the experiment used to characterize MIST. The qubit is initialized in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Demodulated, acquired traces along the axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic of the electronic setup. (b) Optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Circuit diagram of a floating fluxonium with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Superconducting qubits are most often measured using dispersive readout, which, ideally, implements a projective quantum non-demolition (QND) measurement. While a larger readout drive can increase the signal and, thus, reduce discrimination errors in the readout, strong microwave drives may also cause non-QND errors by driving the qubit to a state outside the computational subspace. In this work, we experimentally characterize measurement-induced state transitions (MIST) in a fluxonium qubit over its full external flux range. We further numerically calculate the MIST errors, and find that the theory accurately predicts eleven experimentally identified regions with increased MIST. In addition to transitions to higher fluxonium levels, we also find that, at certain flux points, MIST errors are dominated by transitions that include the transmission-line-like array modes of the fluxonium's superinductor. The excellent match between theory and experiment validates that the models accurately predict the occurrence of MIST in these systems, and further highlights the influence of array modes in fluxonium readout.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally characterizes measurement-induced state transitions (MIST) in a fluxonium superconducting qubit over its full external flux range. The authors identify eleven regions of increased MIST and compare them to numerical calculations from a model that includes transitions to higher fluxonium levels as well as transmission-line-like array modes of the superinductor. They report an excellent match between the predicted and observed regions, with array modes dominating the errors at certain flux points, and conclude that the models accurately predict MIST occurrence.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides direct experimental validation of a numerical model for predicting non-QND errors during dispersive readout of fluxonium qubits. The explicit demonstration that array modes of the superinductor contribute significantly at specific flux points supplies a concrete design consideration for improving readout fidelity. The parameter-independent comparison between theory and experiment (no free parameters fitted to the MIST data) is a notable strength.

minor comments (2)
  1. The criteria used to identify the eleven regions of increased MIST (e.g., threshold on error rate, flux binning, or statistical significance) should be stated explicitly, ideally with a supplementary table or figure showing the raw error rates versus flux.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should include the precise definition of the plotted quantity (e.g., whether the MIST probability is normalized to the computational subspace or includes leakage to array modes).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our work. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: independent numerical model validated against experiment

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental identification of eleven MIST regions across flux, followed by a separate numerical calculation of the same quantity using the fluxonium Hamiltonian (including superinductor array modes) that is reported to match the data. No equations or text indicate that model parameters were fitted to the MIST dataset itself, that a prediction is redefined from the same observations, or that a uniqueness result or ansatz is imported via self-citation to force the outcome. The comparison is presented as validation of an a-priori model rather than a closed loop, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; no explicit fitting constants or new postulated objects are named.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5735 in / 1063 out tokens · 21840 ms · 2026-06-27T00:46:07.642839+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for 9 FIG. 6. (a) Circuit diagram of a floating fluxonium with the individual Josephson junctions that make-up the array, and with the capacitively coupled readout resonator. (b) Two- tone spectros...

    2004

  2. [2]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Swiadek, R

    F. Swiadek, R. Shillito, P. Magnard, A. Remm, C. Hellings, N. Lacroix, Q. Ficheux, D. C. Zanuz, G. J. Norris, A. Blais, S. Krinner, and A. Wallraff, Enhanc- ing dispersive readout of superconducting qubits through dynamic control of the dispersive shift: Experiment and theory, PRX Quantum5, 040326 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    P. A. Spring, L. Milanovic, Y. Sunada, S. Wang, A. F. Van Loo, S. Tamate, and Y. Nakamura, Fast multiplexed superconducting-qubit readout with intrinsic purcell fil- tering using a multiconductor transmission line, PRX Quantum6, 020345 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    P. D. Kurilovich, T. Connolly, C. G. L. Bøttcher, D. K. Weiss, S. Hazra, V. R. Joshi, A. Z. Ding, H. Nho, S. Di- amond, V. D. Kurilovich, W. Dai, V. Fatemi, L. Frun- zio, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, High-frequency readout free from transmon multi-excitation resonances, arXiv:2501.09161 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Marxer, J

    F. Marxer, J. Mrożek, J. Andersson, L. Abdurakhimov, J. Adam, V. Bergholm, R. Beriwal, C. F. Chan, S. Dahl, S. R. Das,et al., Above 99.9% fidelity single-qubit gates, two-qubit gates, and readout in a single superconducting quantum device, PRX Quantum7, 020333 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    Boissonneault, J

    M. Boissonneault, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Non- linear dispersive regime of cavity qed: The dressed de- phasing model, Phys. Rev. A77, 060305(R) (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    Shillito, A

    R. Shillito, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen, J. Beall, M. Hauru, M. Ganahl, A. G. M. Lewis, G. Vidal, and A. Blais, Dynamics of transmon ionization, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 034031 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    K. N. Nesterov and I. V. Pechenezhskiy, Measurement- induced state transitions in dispersive qubit-readout schemes, Phys. Rev. App.22, 064038 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    M. F. Dumas, B. Groleau-Paré, A. McDonald, M. H. Muñoz-Arias, C. Lledó, B. D’Anjou, and A. Blais, Measurement-induced transmon ionization, Phys. Rev. X14, 041023 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Lazar, S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, G. J. Norris, M. Gabureac, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Repeated quantum error detection in a sur- face code, Nat. Phys.16, 875 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Ryan-Anderson, J

    C. Ryan-Anderson, J. G. Bohnet, K. Lee, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, J. P. Gaebler, D. Francois, A. Chernoguzov, D. Lucchetti, N. C. Brown,et al., Realization of real- time fault-tolerant quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X11, 041058 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Leroux, C

    S.Krinner, N.Lacroix, A.Remm, A.DiPaolo, E.Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Her- rmann, G.J.Norris, C.K.Andersen, M.Müller, A.Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature 605, 669 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    K. C. Miao, M. McEwen, J. Atalaya, D. Kafri, L. P. Pryadko, A. Bengtsson, A. Opremcak, K. J. Satzinger, Z. Chen, P. V. Klimov,et al., Overcoming leakage in quantum error correction, Nat. Phys.19, 1780 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature638, 920 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski,et al., A fault-tolerant neutral-atom ar- chitecture for universal quantum computation, Nature 649, 39 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    D. Sank, Z. Chen, M. Khezri, J. Kelly, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler,et al., Measurement-induced state transitions in a superconducting qubit: Beyond the rotating wave approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 190503 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Khezri, A

    M. Khezri, A. Opremcak, Z. Chen, K. C. Miao, M. McEwen, A. Bengtsson, T. White, O. Naaman, D. Sank, A. N. Korotkov, Y. Chen, and V. Smelyan- skiy, Measurement-induced state transitions in a super- conducting qubit: Within the rotating-wave approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. App.20, 054008 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Féchant, M

    M. Féchant, M. F. Dumas, D. Bénâtre, N. Gosling, P. Lenhard, M. Spiecker, S. Geisert, S. Ihssen, W. Werns- dorfer, B. D’Anjou, A. Blais, and I. M. Pop, Offset charge dependence of measurement-induced transitions in trans- mons, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 180603 (2025). 10

    2025

  20. [20]

    Thorbeck, Z

    T. Thorbeck, Z. Xiao, A. Kamal, and L. C. G. Govia, Readout-induced suppression and enhancement of super- conducting qubit lifetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 090602 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Hazra, W

    S. Hazra, W. Dai, T. Connolly, P. D. Kurilovich, Z. Wang, L. Frunzio, and M. H. Devoret, Benchmark- ing the readout of a superconducting qubit for repeated measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 100601 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Connolly, P

    T. Connolly, P. D. Kurilovich, V. D. Kurilovich, C. G. L. Bøttcher, S. Hazra, W. Dai, A. Z. Ding, V. R. Joshi, H. Nho, S. Diamond, D. K. Weiss, V. Fatemi, L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Full characterization of measurement-induced transitions of a superconducting qubit, arXiv:2506.05306 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Zobrist, J

    N. Zobrist, J. M. Kreikebaum, M. Khezri, S. V. Isakov, B. J. Lester, Y. Zhang, A. Di Paolo, D. Sank, and W. C. Smith, Measurement-induced state transitions in inductively-shunted transmons, arXiv:2603.12114 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Z. Wang, B. D’Anjou, P. Gigon, A. Blais, and M. S. Blok, Probing excited-state dynamics of transmon ionization, arXiv:2505.00639 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Y. Li, W. Nuerbolati, C. Deng, X. Ma, H. Xiong, and H. Yu, Mitigating state-transition errors during readout with a synchronized flux pulse, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 054045 (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Singh, G

    S. Singh, G. Refael, A. Clerk, and E. Rosenfeld, Impact of josephson-junction array modes on fluxonium readout, PRX Quantum6, 040304 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    A. A. Chapple, B. M. Varbanov, A. McDonald, and A. Blais, Measurement-induced state transitions across the fluxonium qubit landscape, arXiv:2604.08515 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Bothara, S

    G. Bothara, S. Das, K. V. Salunkhe, M. Chand, J. Desh- mukh, M. P. Patankar, and R. Vijay, High-fidelity qnd readout and measurement back-action in a tantalum- based high-coherence fluxonium qubit, APL Quantum2, 026103 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  30. [30]

    V. E. Manucharyan, J. Koch, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Fluxonium: Single cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets, Science326, 113 (2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Somoroff, Q

    A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coher- ence in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 267001 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    T. Wang, F. Wu, F. Wang, X. Ma, G. Zhang, J. Chen, H. Deng, R. Gao, R. Hu, L. Ma,et al., Efficient initializa- tion of fluxonium qubits based on auxiliary energy levels, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 230601 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    D. A. Rower, L. Ding, H. Zhang, M. Hays, J. An, P. M. Harrington, I. T. Rosen, J. M. Gertler, T. M. Hazard, B. M. Niedzielski,et al., Suppressing counter-rotating errors for fast single-qubit gates with fluxonium, PRX Quantum5, 040342 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    L. Ding, M. Hays, Y. Sung, B. Kannan, J. An, A. Di Paolo, A. H. Karamlou, T. M. Hazard, K. Azar, D. K. Kim,et al., High-fidelity, frequency-flexible two- qubit fluxonium gates with a transmon coupler, Phys. Rev. X13, 031035 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Bista, M

    A. Bista, M. Thibodeau, K. Nie, K. Chow, B. K. Clark, and A. Kou, Readout-induced leakage of the fluxonium qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 034058 (2026)

    2026

  36. [36]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

    1985

  37. [37]

    Salathé, P

    Y. Salathé, P. Kurpiers, T. Karg, C. Lang, C. K. An- dersen, A. Akin, S. Krinner, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Low-latency digital signal processing for feedback and feedforward in quantum computing and communication, Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 034011 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    M. A. Rol, F. Battistel, F. K. Malinowski, C. C. Bultink, B. M. Tarasinski, R. Vollmer, N. Haider, N. Muthusub- ramanian, A. Bruno, B. M. Terhal, and L. DiCarlo, Fast, high-fidelity conditional-phase gate exploiting leakage in- terference in weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 120502 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    C. C. Bultink, B. Tarasinski, N. Haandbæk, S. Poletto, N. Haider, D. J. Michalak, A. Bruno, and L. DiCarlo, General method for extracting the quantum efficiency of dispersive qubit readout in circuit qed, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 092601 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Heinsoo, C

    J. Heinsoo, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Krinner, T. Walter, Y. Salathé, S. Gasparinetti, J.-C. Besse, A. Potočnik, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Rapid high- fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 034040 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    T. V. Stefanski and C. K. Andersen, Flux-pulse-assisted readout of a fluxonium qubit, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 014079 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    T. V. Stefanski, F. Yilmaz, E. Y. Huang, M. F. S. Zwa- nenburg, S. Singh, S. Wang, L. J. Splitthoff, and C. K. Andersen, Improved fluxonium readout through dynamic flux pulsing, arXiv:2411.13437 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Cohen, A

    J. Cohen, A. Petrescu, R. Shillito, and A. Blais, Reminis- cence of classical chaos in driven transmons, PRX Quan- tum4, 020312 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral op- erators, J

    C. Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral op- erators, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand.45, 255 (1950)

    1950

  45. [45]

    Di Paolo, Multi-target density matrix renor- malization group X algorithm and its application to cir- cuit quantum electrodynamics, arXiv:2506.24109 (2025)

    S.Gonzaléz-García, A.Szasz, A.Pagano, D.Kafri, G.Vi- dal, and A. Di Paolo, Multi-target density matrix renor- malization group X algorithm and its application to cir- cuit quantum electrodynamics, arXiv:2506.24109 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    M. F. S. Zwanenburg and C. K. Andersen, Crosstalk in multi-qubit fluxonium architectures with transmon cou- plers, arXiv:2603.09870 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    M. A. Rol, L. Ciorciaro, F. K. Malinowski, B. M. Tarasin- ski, R. E. Sagastizabal, C. C. Bultink, Y. Salathe, N. Haandbæk, J. Sedivy, and L. DiCarlo, Time-domain characterization and correction of on-chip distortion of control pulses in a quantum processor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 054001 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Hellings, N

    C. Hellings, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, R. Boell, J. Her- rmann, S. Lazăr, S. Krinner, F. Swiadek, C. K. Ander- sen, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Calibrating magnetic flux control in superconducting circuits by compensating distortions on timescales from nanoseconds up to tens of microseconds, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043142 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Delft High Performance Computing Center (DHPC), DelftBlue Supercomputer (Phase 2) (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Data repository, http://doi.org/10.4121/22122209-2f78- 4a66-8d04-fe18ac8b244e. 11

    work page doi:10.4121/22122209-2f78-

  51. [51]

    GitHub repository, https://github.com/ andersenqubitlab/fluxonium-mist

  52. [52]

    Yilmaz, S

    F. Yilmaz, S. Singh, M. F. S. Zwanenburg, J. Hu, T. V. Stefanski, and C. K. Andersen, Energy-participation- ratio analysis for very anharmonic superconducting cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 044021 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Deppe, S

    F. Deppe, S. Saito, H. Tanaka, and H. Takayanagi, Deter- mination of the capacitance of nm scale josephson junc- tions, J. Appl. Phys95, 2607–2613 (2004)

    2004