Exact operator dynamics in Lindbladian Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theories

Qicheng Tang; Ruhanshi Barad; Xueda Wen

arxiv: 2606.19465 · v1 · pith:CMVKHGBYnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.str-el· hep-th

Exact operator dynamics in Lindbladian Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theories

Qicheng Tang , Ruhanshi Barad , Xueda Wen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 18:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-th

keywords Wess-Zumino-Witten modelLindblad dynamicsoperator dynamicsKac-Moody algebraconformal field theoryopen quantum systemsAbelian vs non-Abelian

0 comments

The pith

Lindblad dynamics close exactly under the current algebra for any jump rates in Abelian U(1) WZW theories but only for symmetric baths and one operator in non-Abelian cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies operator evolution under Lindblad equations in Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theories when the jump operators are linear in Kac-Moody current modes. It establishes that the Heisenberg equations close in the Abelian U(1)_k setting for arbitrary rate choices, yielding exact analytic solutions that include cooling protocols. In non-Abelian theories closure requires equal upward and downward rates and produces a simple closed equation only for a single current operator; generic imbalances generate extra non-Abelian terms that break closure. A sympathetic reader cares because exact results remain rare for open many-body systems and this work shows how the current algebra supplies solvability in one broad class while restricting it sharply in the other.

Core claim

In Abelian U(1)_k WZW theories this closure of operator dynamics holds for arbitrary settings of jump rates and includes exactly tractable cooling dynamics. In contrast, for non-Abelian WZW theories, exact closure occurs only for symmetric current-mode dissipation, where upward and downward current-mode transitions occur with equal rates, and even then it leads to a simple closed evolution only for a single current operator. Generic imbalances, including those needed for cooling, produce additional non-Abelian terms and prevent closure of the operator dynamics. Consequently, the current algebra gives rise to a broad family of exactly solvable dissipative dynamics in the Abelian setting, wher

What carries the argument

Closure of the Heisenberg equations for current operators under the Kac-Moody current algebra when the Lindblad jump operators are linear in those currents.

If this is right

Cooling dynamics in Abelian U(1)_k WZW theories become exactly solvable for any choice of rates.
Non-Abelian WZW theories admit exact closed dynamics only under balanced (infinite-temperature) dissipation.
The algebra supplies analytic control over the evolution of current operators in the Abelian family.
Imbalanced rates in non-Abelian models produce non-closing equations that cannot be solved by the same method.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Abelian theories appear more robust than non-Abelian ones to the choice of dissipation for maintaining exact solvability.
The restriction to linear jumps suggests that experiments or simulations with nonlinear couplings would quickly lose analytic tractability.
One could look for analogous closures in other current-algebra-based models with different central charges or with added perturbations.

Load-bearing premise

The Lindblad jump operators are linear in the Kac-Moody current modes.

What would settle it

If a Lindblad jump operator that is quadratic or otherwise nonlinear in the current modes is introduced, the time evolution of a current operator will generate terms outside the current algebra and the claimed closure will fail.

read the original abstract

Understanding the time evolution of physical observables in open quantum many-body systems coupled to external environments is a natural and difficult problem, and exact results are still rare. In this work, we study this problem for Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) conformal field theories with Lindblad jump operators linear in Kac-Moody current modes. We investigate the exact operator dynamics generated by these Lindbladians, identifying classes of current operators whose Heisenberg equations close and can therefore be solved analytically using the underlying current algebra. In Abelian $U(1)_k$ WZW theories, this closure of operator dynamics holds for arbitrary settings of jump rates and includes exactly tractable cooling dynamics. In contrast, for non-Abelian WZW theories, exact closure occurs only for symmetric current-mode dissipation, where upward and downward current-mode transitions occur with equal rates, and even then it leads to a simple closed evolution only for a single current operator. Generic imbalances, including those needed for cooling, produce additional non-Abelian terms and prevent closure of the opeartor dynamics. Consequently, the current algebra gives rise to a broad family of exactly solvable dissipative dynamics in the Abelian setting, whereas in the non-Abelian case it singles out only a special exactly solvable dynamics corresponding to an infinite-temperature bath.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper cleanly shows that current algebra closes the Heisenberg equations for arbitrary Lindblad rates in Abelian U(1)_k WZW models but only for symmetric rates and single operators in the non-Abelian case.

read the letter

The key point is that when Lindblad jumps are linear in Kac-Moody currents, the Abelian theories give exact closure for any rates, including cooling, while non-Abelian ones require symmetric rates and still only close for one operator. This distinction comes straight from the algebra: commutators stay inside the linear span when everything commutes up to central charge, but non-commuting currents generate extra terms unless rates match in both directions.

The work applies the standard current algebra to the Lindblad generator in the Heisenberg picture. That produces a family of solvable dissipative dynamics in the Abelian setting that was not previously spelled out. The non-Abelian restriction follows directly once you expand the double commutators. The argument is algebraic and does not rely on fitting or self-reference, so the central claim holds up on its own terms.

The main limitation is the assumption that jumps are strictly linear in the currents. If a physical model needs quadratic or higher terms, the equations no longer close and the exact solvability disappears. The abstract also limits the non-Abelian result to a single operator even under symmetric rates, which narrows the practical payoff. No higher-order checks or explicit time-evolution formulas appear in the summary, but the setup itself is consistent.

This is for readers already working on open-system CFTs or current-algebra methods in condensed matter. Someone looking for concrete solvable examples in Lindbladian WZW models will find the Abelian/non-Abelian split useful. It is narrow but the algebra is checkable, so it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines operator dynamics under Lindblad evolution in Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theories when the jump operators are linear in Kac-Moody current modes. It identifies classes of current operators for which the Heisenberg equations close under the current algebra, permitting exact analytic solution. In Abelian U(1)_k theories the closure holds for arbitrary jump rates (including cooling), while in non-Abelian theories it occurs only under symmetric dissipation and only for a single current operator; generic rate imbalances generate extra non-Abelian terms that prevent closure.

Significance. If the algebraic closure claims hold, the work supplies a concrete family of exactly solvable dissipative dynamics in Abelian WZW models, a rare occurrence in open quantum many-body systems. The algebra-driven distinction between Abelian and non-Abelian cases is a clear strength, and the derivations are parameter-free and grounded in the known current algebra rather than fitted data.

major comments (2)

[Results paragraph] Results paragraph (first sentence): the central claim that the Heisenberg equations close for linear combinations of current modes rests on the linearity of the Lindblad jump operators; an explicit check that no higher-order nested commutators escape the linear span is required to confirm the closure for arbitrary rates in the Abelian case.
[Abstract] Abstract, non-Abelian paragraph: the statement that only symmetric dissipation yields closure, and only for a single operator, is load-bearing for the contrast with the Abelian case; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit non-commuting term generated by an asymmetric rate choice (e.g., for SU(2)_k) to substantiate that generic imbalances prevent closure.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Typo: 'opeartor' should read 'operator'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the algebraic closure arguments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results paragraph] Results paragraph (first sentence): the central claim that the Heisenberg equations close for linear combinations of current modes rests on the linearity of the Lindblad jump operators; an explicit check that no higher-order nested commutators escape the linear span is required to confirm the closure for arbitrary rates in the Abelian case.

Authors: In the Abelian U(1)_k theory the current modes obey [J_m, J_n] = 0 (the central extension is a c-number and does not affect the linear span of the operators). Consequently every nested commutator appearing in the Heisenberg equation generated by a Lindblad superoperator with linear jump operators remains inside the same finite-dimensional linear space. We have added an explicit verification of this fact, including the direct computation of the double commutators for arbitrary rate choices, in a new paragraph of the revised Results section. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, non-Abelian paragraph: the statement that only symmetric dissipation yields closure, and only for a single operator, is load-bearing for the contrast with the Abelian case; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit non-commuting term generated by an asymmetric rate choice (e.g., for SU(2)_k) to substantiate that generic imbalances prevent closure.

Authors: We agree that an explicit term strengthens the contrast. For SU(2)_k with unequal rates γ_+ ≠ γ_- the Lindblad contribution to dJ^3/dt acquires an extra piece proportional to (γ_+ - γ_-) [J^+, J^-] ~ (γ_+ - γ_-) J^3 that cannot be absorbed into a closed equation for a single current; the symmetric case γ_+ = γ_- cancels this term. We have inserted the explicit expansion of this non-commuting contribution (together with the analogous calculation for a generic linear combination) into the revised non-Abelian subsection and the abstract has been updated for precision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation applies the established Kac-Moody current algebra of WZW theories to the Lindblad generator under the explicit premise that jump operators are linear in current modes. Closure of the Heisenberg equations for Abelian U(1)_k cases (arbitrary rates) and the restricted non-Abelian cases (symmetric rates) follows directly from the commutation relations without any self-definitional loops, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The paper states the linearity condition upfront and derives the solvability distinction from the algebra itself; no step reduces the claimed result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the system is a WZW CFT whose currents satisfy the standard Kac-Moody algebra and that the Lindblad operators are linear combinations of those currents; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The physical system is described by a Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theory whose currents obey the Kac-Moody algebra.
Stated in the title and first sentence of the abstract as the setting for the Lindbladian.
domain assumption Lindblad jump operators are linear in the Kac-Moody current modes.
Explicitly given in the abstract as the class of models under study; this linearity is required for the algebra to close.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 1518 out tokens · 22070 ms · 2026-06-26T18:42:39.783469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[1]

Lindbladian dynamics of two current operators 11 VII

Difference between Abelian and non-Abelian cases 10 B. Lindbladian dynamics of two current operators 11 VII. Exact single-current dynamics in general non-Abelian WZW current-mode Lindbladians 11 VIII. Discussion and conclusions 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 14 I. INTRODUCTION The dynamics of quantum many-body systems is generically influenced by coupli...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

Difference between Abelian and non-Abelian cases Although the single-current dynamics is exactly solv- able in both theU(1) k andSU(2) k WZW theories when the jump rates satisfy the symmetry conditionγ(p) = γ(−p), the resulting dynamics is qualitatively different in the two cases. For the AbelianU(1)k theory, the symmet- ric choice of rates eliminates the...
[3]

M¨ uller, S

M. M¨ uller, S. Diehl, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, En- gineered open systems and quantum simulations with atoms and ions, inAdvances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, Vol. 61 (Elsevier, 2012) pp. 1–80

2012
[4]

Reiter, A

F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nature communica- tions8, 1822 (2017)

2017
[5]

Tomadin, S

A. Tomadin, S. Diehl, M. D. Lukin, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Reservoir engineering and dynamical phase transitions in optomechanical arrays, Physical Review A 86, 10.1103/physreva.86.033821 (2012)

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.033821 2012
[6]

Ishii and D

T. Ishii and D. Takeda, Lindblad dynamics in holography, Phys. Rev. D112, 046020 (2025)

2025
[7]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

2007
[8]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

1976
[9]

Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008), arXiv:0801.1257 [quant-ph]

T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008), arXiv:0801.1257 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[10]

Prosen and B

T. Prosen and B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, Exact solution of Markovian master equations for quadratic Fermi systems: thermal baths, open XY spin chains and non-equilibrium phase transition, New Journal of Physics12, 025016 (2010), arXiv:0910.0195 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[11]

Barthel and Y

T. Barthel and Y. Zhang, Solving quasi-free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment2022, 113101 (2022), arXiv:2112.08344 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2022
[12]

Yamanaka and T

K. Yamanaka and T. Sasamoto, Exact solution for the Lindbladian dynamics for the open XX spin chain with boundary dissipation, SciPost Phys.14, 112 (2023)

2023
[13]

ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, L05002 (2010)

M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, L05002 (2010)

2010
[14]

ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- sentation, Phys

M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- sentation, Phys. Rev. E83, 011108 (2011)

2011
[15]

M. V. Medvedyeva, F. H. Essler, and T. Prosen, Ex- act bethe ansatz spectrum of a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise, Physical Review Letters117, 10.1103/physrevlett.117.137202 (2016)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.137202 2016
[16]

Ilievski, Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic sys- tems: from graded yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states, SciPost Physics3, 10.21468/scipost- phys.3.4.031 (2017)

E. Ilievski, Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic sys- tems: from graded yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states, SciPost Physics3, 10.21468/scipost- phys.3.4.031 (2017)

work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2017
[17]

de Leeuw, C

M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, and B. Pozsgay, Constructing integrable lindblad superoperators, Physical Review Let- ters126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.240403 (2021)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.240403 2021
[18]

Yamamoto, M

K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, M. Tezuka, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Universal properties of dissipa- tive tomonaga-luttinger liquids: Case study of a non- hermitian xxz spin chain, Physical Review B105, 10.1103/physrevb.105.205125 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.205125 2022
[19]

Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe ansatz results, SciPost Physics Core8, 10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 (2025)

V. Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe ansatz results, SciPost Physics Core8, 10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 (2025)

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 2025
[20]

A. I. Lotkov, D. V. Kurlov, A. K. Fedorov, N. A. Nemkov, and V. Gritsev, Conformal symmetry in quasifree marko- vian open quantum systems, Physical Review B108, 10.1103/physrevb.108.064312 (2023)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.064312 2023
[21]

W. Mao, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomoge- neous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 200 (2024), arXiv:2403.15851 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024
[22]

L. Su, A. Clerk, and I. Martin, Dynamics and phases of nonunitary Floquet transverse-field Ising model, Physi- cal Review Research6, 013131 (2024), arXiv:2306.07428 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2024
[23]

X. Wen, Exactly solvable non-unitary time evolution in quantum critical systems I: effect of complex space- time metrics, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 103103 (2024), arXiv:2406.17059 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2024
[24]

Lapierre, P

B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 104322 (2025), arXiv:2505.01508 [cond- mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025
[25]

Z.-X. Lin, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and S. Ryu, Chiral instabilities in driven-dissipative quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 165131 (2025), arXiv:2502.04443 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2025
[26]

C. Bai, W. Mao, M. Nozaki, M. Tian Tan, and X. Wen, Relaxation Process During Complex Time Evolution In Two-Dimensional Integrable and Chaotic CFTs, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2601.09290 (2026), arXiv:2601.09290 [hep- th]

arXiv 2026
[27]

Barad, Q

R. Barad, Q. Tang, and X. Wen, Dissipation meets con- formal interface in open quantum systems: How the re- laxation rate is suppressed, Phys. Rev. B112, 235143 (2025), arXiv:2505.04715 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025
[28]

Karch and M

A. Karch and M. Wang, Universality of Dissipation across Holographic Interfaces, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.16888 (2026), arXiv:2601.16888 [hep-th]

arXiv 2026
[29]

Affleck and F

I. Affleck and F. D. M. Haldane, Critical theory of quan- tum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B36, 5291 (1987)

1987
[30]

Affleck, Realization of a witten critical theory in (CH3)4nmncl3, Phys

I. Affleck, Realization of a witten critical theory in (CH3)4nmncl3, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2763 (1986)

1986
[31]

Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Poly- nomial, Commun

E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Poly- nomial, Commun. Math. Phys.121, 351 (1989)

1989
[32]

G. W. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991)

1991
[33]

Ardonne and K

E. Ardonne and K. Schoutens, New Class of Non- Abelian Spin-Singlet Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 5096 (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9811352 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[34]

Ardonne, N

E. Ardonne, N. Read, E. Rezayi, and K. Schoutens, Non- abelian spin-singlet quantum Hall states: wave functions and quasihole state counting, Nuclear Physics B607, 549 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0104250 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[35]

A. E. B. Nielsen, J. I. Cirac, and G. Sierra, Quan- tum spin Hamiltonians for the SU(2) k WZW model, J. Stat. Mech.1111, P11014 (2011), arXiv:1109.5470 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[36]

Thomale, S

R. Thomale, S. Rachel, P. Schmitteckert, and M. Greiter, 15 Family of spin-S chain representations of SU(2) k Wess- Zumino-Witten models, Phys. Rev. B85, 195149 (2012), arXiv:1110.5956 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[37]

Tu, Projected BCS states and spin hamiltonians for theSO(n) 1 Wess-Zumino-Witten model, Phys

H.-H. Tu, Projected BCS states and spin hamiltonians for theSO(n) 1 Wess-Zumino-Witten model, Phys. Rev. B87, 041103 (2013), arXiv:1210.1481 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[38]

H.-H. Tu, A. E. B. Nielsen, and G. Sierra, Quantum spin models for the SU(n)1 Wess–Zumino–Witten model, Nucl. Phys. B886, 328 (2014), arXiv:1405.2950 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[39]

Michaud, S

F. Michaud, S. R. Manmana, and F. Mila, Realization of higher Wess-Zumino-Witten models in spin chains, Phys. Rev. B87, 140404 (2013), arXiv:1301.5719 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[40]

Lecheminant and A

P. Lecheminant and A. M. Tsvelik, Lattice spin mod- els for non-Abelian chiral spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B95, 140406 (2017), arXiv:1608.05977 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[41]

Quella and A

T. Quella and A. Roy, Conformal field theory and the non-abelianSU(2) k chiral spin liquid, J. Stat. Mech. 2005, 053107 (2020), arXiv:1911.01505 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2005
[42]

G. J. Henderson, G. J. Sreejith, and S. H. Simon, Con- formal field theory approach to parton fractional quan- tum Hall trial wave functions, Phys. Rev. B109, 205128 (2024), arXiv:2309.11910 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2024
[43]

Liu, Y.-H

T. Liu, Y.-H. Wu, H.-H. Tu, and T. Xiang, Bridging conformal field theory and parton approaches to SU(n)k chiral spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 205137 (2025), arXiv:2501.09567 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025
[44]

T. Prosen, Spectral theorem for the Lindblad equation for quadratic open fermionic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, 07020 (2010), arXiv:1005.0763 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[45]

Prosen and T

T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces (2010), arXiv:1007.2921 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[46]

Francesco, P

P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal field theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

2012
[47]

Matko, E

A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Third quantization of open quantum systems: Dissipative symmetries and con- nections to phase-space and keldysh field-theory formu- lations, Physical Review Research5, 10.1103/physrevre- search.5.033107 (2023)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevre- 2023
[48]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level sys- tems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

1976
[49]

Kim and F

S. Kim and F. Hassler, Third quantization for bosons: symplectic diagonalization, non-hermitian hamiltonian, and symmetries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 385303 (2023)

2023
[50]

Ding, C.-F

Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033147 (2024)

2024
[51]

Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid Quantum Ground State Prepa- ration via Dissipative Dynamics, Physical Review X16, 011004 (2026), arXiv:2503.15827 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2026
[52]

Lin, Dissipative Preparation of Many-Body Quantum States: Towards Practical Quantum Advantage, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.21308 (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

L. Lin, Dissipative Preparation of Many-Body Quantum States: Towards Practical Quantum Advantage, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.21308 (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025
[53]

Yoshida and R

H. Yoshida and R. Hamazaki, Theory of steady states for lindblad equations beyond time-independence: Classification, uniqueness and symmetry (2026), arXiv:2602.13095 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[54]

Wen and J.-Q

X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, Floquet conformal field theory, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.00031 (2018), arXiv:1805.00031 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[55]

R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Emergent Spatial Structure and Entanglement Localization in Flo- quet Conformal Field Theory, Physical Review X10, 031036 (2020), arXiv:1908.05289 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2020
[56]

Lapierre, K

B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Emergent black hole dynamics in criti- cal Floquet systems, Physical Review Research2, 023085 (2020), arXiv:1909.08618 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2020
[57]

X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and Y. Gu, Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories, Physical Review Research3, 023044 (2021), arXiv:2006.10072 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2021
[58]

Lapierre, K

B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neu- pert, and R. Chitra, The fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2006.10054 (2020), arXiv:2006.10054 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2006
[59]

X. Wen, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and R. Fan, Period- ically, Quasi-periodically, and Randomly Driven Con- formal Field Theories (II): Furstenberg’s Theorem and Exceptions to Heating Phases, SciPost Physics13, 082 (2022), arXiv:2109.10923 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2022
[60]

L.-H. Mo, B. Lapierre, and Q. Miao, Observing conformal Floquet dynamics on a digital quantum processor, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.27530 (2026), arXiv:2605.27530 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[1] [1]

Lindbladian dynamics of two current operators 11 VII

Difference between Abelian and non-Abelian cases 10 B. Lindbladian dynamics of two current operators 11 VII. Exact single-current dynamics in general non-Abelian WZW current-mode Lindbladians 11 VIII. Discussion and conclusions 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 14 I. INTRODUCTION The dynamics of quantum many-body systems is generically influenced by coupli...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[2] [2]

Difference between Abelian and non-Abelian cases Although the single-current dynamics is exactly solv- able in both theU(1) k andSU(2) k WZW theories when the jump rates satisfy the symmetry conditionγ(p) = γ(−p), the resulting dynamics is qualitatively different in the two cases. For the AbelianU(1)k theory, the symmet- ric choice of rates eliminates the...

[3] [3]

M¨ uller, S

M. M¨ uller, S. Diehl, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, En- gineered open systems and quantum simulations with atoms and ions, inAdvances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, Vol. 61 (Elsevier, 2012) pp. 1–80

2012

[4] [4]

Reiter, A

F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nature communica- tions8, 1822 (2017)

2017

[5] [5]

Tomadin, S

A. Tomadin, S. Diehl, M. D. Lukin, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Reservoir engineering and dynamical phase transitions in optomechanical arrays, Physical Review A 86, 10.1103/physreva.86.033821 (2012)

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.033821 2012

[6] [6]

Ishii and D

T. Ishii and D. Takeda, Lindblad dynamics in holography, Phys. Rev. D112, 046020 (2025)

2025

[7] [7]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

2007

[8] [8]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in mathematical physics 48, 119 (1976)

1976

[9] [9]

Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008), arXiv:0801.1257 [quant-ph]

T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008), arXiv:0801.1257 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[10] [10]

Prosen and B

T. Prosen and B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, Exact solution of Markovian master equations for quadratic Fermi systems: thermal baths, open XY spin chains and non-equilibrium phase transition, New Journal of Physics12, 025016 (2010), arXiv:0910.0195 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[11] [11]

Barthel and Y

T. Barthel and Y. Zhang, Solving quasi-free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechan- ics: Theory and Experiment2022, 113101 (2022), arXiv:2112.08344 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2022

[12] [12]

Yamanaka and T

K. Yamanaka and T. Sasamoto, Exact solution for the Lindbladian dynamics for the open XX spin chain with boundary dissipation, SciPost Phys.14, 112 (2023)

2023

[13] [13]

ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, L05002 (2010)

M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, L05002 (2010)

2010

[14] [14]

ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- sentation, Phys

M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model ex- hibiting a phase transition and a matrix product repre- sentation, Phys. Rev. E83, 011108 (2011)

2011

[15] [15]

M. V. Medvedyeva, F. H. Essler, and T. Prosen, Ex- act bethe ansatz spectrum of a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise, Physical Review Letters117, 10.1103/physrevlett.117.137202 (2016)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.137202 2016

[16] [16]

Ilievski, Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic sys- tems: from graded yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states, SciPost Physics3, 10.21468/scipost- phys.3.4.031 (2017)

E. Ilievski, Dissipation-driven integrable fermionic sys- tems: from graded yangians to exact nonequilib- rium steady states, SciPost Physics3, 10.21468/scipost- phys.3.4.031 (2017)

work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2017

[17] [17]

de Leeuw, C

M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, and B. Pozsgay, Constructing integrable lindblad superoperators, Physical Review Let- ters126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.240403 (2021)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.240403 2021

[18] [18]

Yamamoto, M

K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, M. Tezuka, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Universal properties of dissipa- tive tomonaga-luttinger liquids: Case study of a non- hermitian xxz spin chain, Physical Review B105, 10.1103/physrevb.105.205125 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.205125 2022

[19] [19]

Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe ansatz results, SciPost Physics Core8, 10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 (2025)

V. Alba, Free fermions with dephasing and boundary driving: Bethe ansatz results, SciPost Physics Core8, 10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 (2025)

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.1.011 2025

[20] [20]

A. I. Lotkov, D. V. Kurlov, A. K. Fedorov, N. A. Nemkov, and V. Gritsev, Conformal symmetry in quasifree marko- vian open quantum systems, Physical Review B108, 10.1103/physrevb.108.064312 (2023)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.064312 2023

[21] [21]

W. Mao, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomoge- neous and homogeneous CFT Hamiltonians, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 200 (2024), arXiv:2403.15851 [hep-th]

arXiv 2024

[22] [22]

L. Su, A. Clerk, and I. Martin, Dynamics and phases of nonunitary Floquet transverse-field Ising model, Physi- cal Review Research6, 013131 (2024), arXiv:2306.07428 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2024

[23] [23]

X. Wen, Exactly solvable non-unitary time evolution in quantum critical systems I: effect of complex space- time metrics, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 103103 (2024), arXiv:2406.17059 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2024

[24] [24]

Lapierre, P

B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 104322 (2025), arXiv:2505.01508 [cond- mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025

[25] [25]

Z.-X. Lin, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and S. Ryu, Chiral instabilities in driven-dissipative quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 165131 (2025), arXiv:2502.04443 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2025

[26] [26]

C. Bai, W. Mao, M. Nozaki, M. Tian Tan, and X. Wen, Relaxation Process During Complex Time Evolution In Two-Dimensional Integrable and Chaotic CFTs, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2601.09290 (2026), arXiv:2601.09290 [hep- th]

arXiv 2026

[27] [27]

Barad, Q

R. Barad, Q. Tang, and X. Wen, Dissipation meets con- formal interface in open quantum systems: How the re- laxation rate is suppressed, Phys. Rev. B112, 235143 (2025), arXiv:2505.04715 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

Karch and M

A. Karch and M. Wang, Universality of Dissipation across Holographic Interfaces, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.16888 (2026), arXiv:2601.16888 [hep-th]

arXiv 2026

[29] [29]

Affleck and F

I. Affleck and F. D. M. Haldane, Critical theory of quan- tum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B36, 5291 (1987)

1987

[30] [30]

Affleck, Realization of a witten critical theory in (CH3)4nmncl3, Phys

I. Affleck, Realization of a witten critical theory in (CH3)4nmncl3, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2763 (1986)

1986

[31] [31]

Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Poly- nomial, Commun

E. Witten, Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Poly- nomial, Commun. Math. Phys.121, 351 (1989)

1989

[32] [32]

G. W. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991)

1991

[33] [33]

Ardonne and K

E. Ardonne and K. Schoutens, New Class of Non- Abelian Spin-Singlet Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 5096 (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9811352 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[34] [34]

Ardonne, N

E. Ardonne, N. Read, E. Rezayi, and K. Schoutens, Non- abelian spin-singlet quantum Hall states: wave functions and quasihole state counting, Nuclear Physics B607, 549 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0104250 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

[35] [35]

A. E. B. Nielsen, J. I. Cirac, and G. Sierra, Quan- tum spin Hamiltonians for the SU(2) k WZW model, J. Stat. Mech.1111, P11014 (2011), arXiv:1109.5470 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[36] [36]

Thomale, S

R. Thomale, S. Rachel, P. Schmitteckert, and M. Greiter, 15 Family of spin-S chain representations of SU(2) k Wess- Zumino-Witten models, Phys. Rev. B85, 195149 (2012), arXiv:1110.5956 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[37] [37]

Tu, Projected BCS states and spin hamiltonians for theSO(n) 1 Wess-Zumino-Witten model, Phys

H.-H. Tu, Projected BCS states and spin hamiltonians for theSO(n) 1 Wess-Zumino-Witten model, Phys. Rev. B87, 041103 (2013), arXiv:1210.1481 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[38] [38]

H.-H. Tu, A. E. B. Nielsen, and G. Sierra, Quantum spin models for the SU(n)1 Wess–Zumino–Witten model, Nucl. Phys. B886, 328 (2014), arXiv:1405.2950 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[39] [39]

Michaud, S

F. Michaud, S. R. Manmana, and F. Mila, Realization of higher Wess-Zumino-Witten models in spin chains, Phys. Rev. B87, 140404 (2013), arXiv:1301.5719 [cond- mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[40] [40]

Lecheminant and A

P. Lecheminant and A. M. Tsvelik, Lattice spin mod- els for non-Abelian chiral spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B95, 140406 (2017), arXiv:1608.05977 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[41] [41]

Quella and A

T. Quella and A. Roy, Conformal field theory and the non-abelianSU(2) k chiral spin liquid, J. Stat. Mech. 2005, 053107 (2020), arXiv:1911.01505 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2005

[42] [42]

G. J. Henderson, G. J. Sreejith, and S. H. Simon, Con- formal field theory approach to parton fractional quan- tum Hall trial wave functions, Phys. Rev. B109, 205128 (2024), arXiv:2309.11910 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2024

[43] [43]

Liu, Y.-H

T. Liu, Y.-H. Wu, H.-H. Tu, and T. Xiang, Bridging conformal field theory and parton approaches to SU(n)k chiral spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 205137 (2025), arXiv:2501.09567 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2025

[44] [44]

T. Prosen, Spectral theorem for the Lindblad equation for quadratic open fermionic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2010, 07020 (2010), arXiv:1005.0763 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[45] [45]

Prosen and T

T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces (2010), arXiv:1007.2921 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[46] [46]

Francesco, P

P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal field theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

2012

[47] [47]

Matko, E

A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Third quantization of open quantum systems: Dissipative symmetries and con- nections to phase-space and keldysh field-theory formu- lations, Physical Review Research5, 10.1103/physrevre- search.5.033107 (2023)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevre- 2023

[48] [48]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level sys- tems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

1976

[49] [49]

Kim and F

S. Kim and F. Hassler, Third quantization for bosons: symplectic diagonalization, non-hermitian hamiltonian, and symmetries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 385303 (2023)

2023

[50] [50]

Ding, C.-F

Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033147 (2024)

2024

[51] [51]

Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid Quantum Ground State Prepa- ration via Dissipative Dynamics, Physical Review X16, 011004 (2026), arXiv:2503.15827 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2026

[52] [52]

Lin, Dissipative Preparation of Many-Body Quantum States: Towards Practical Quantum Advantage, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.21308 (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

L. Lin, Dissipative Preparation of Many-Body Quantum States: Towards Practical Quantum Advantage, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.21308 (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

arXiv 2025

[53] [53]

Yoshida and R

H. Yoshida and R. Hamazaki, Theory of steady states for lindblad equations beyond time-independence: Classification, uniqueness and symmetry (2026), arXiv:2602.13095 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[54] [54]

Wen and J.-Q

X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, Floquet conformal field theory, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.00031 (2018), arXiv:1805.00031 [cond-mat.str-el]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[55] [55]

R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Emergent Spatial Structure and Entanglement Localization in Flo- quet Conformal Field Theory, Physical Review X10, 031036 (2020), arXiv:1908.05289 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2020

[56] [56]

Lapierre, K

B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Emergent black hole dynamics in criti- cal Floquet systems, Physical Review Research2, 023085 (2020), arXiv:1909.08618 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2020

[57] [57]

X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and Y. Gu, Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories, Physical Review Research3, 023044 (2021), arXiv:2006.10072 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2021

[58] [58]

Lapierre, K

B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neu- pert, and R. Chitra, The fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2006.10054 (2020), arXiv:2006.10054 [cond-mat.str-el]

arXiv 2006

[59] [59]

X. Wen, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and R. Fan, Period- ically, Quasi-periodically, and Randomly Driven Con- formal Field Theories (II): Furstenberg’s Theorem and Exceptions to Heating Phases, SciPost Physics13, 082 (2022), arXiv:2109.10923 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

arXiv 2022

[60] [60]

L.-H. Mo, B. Lapierre, and Q. Miao, Observing conformal Floquet dynamics on a digital quantum processor, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.27530 (2026), arXiv:2605.27530 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026