pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20368 · v1 · pith:HP35FAKDnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

DEM analysis of the 6 September 2011 large-scale coronal wave

Amaia Razquin , Astrid M. Veronig , Karin Dissauer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords large-scale coronal wavesdifferential emission measureSDO/AIAsolar flarescoronal mass ejectionstemperature enhancementadiabatic heating
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 6 September 2011 coronal wave shows temperature increases exceeding adiabatic compression, suggesting additional heating mechanisms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies differential emission measure analysis to SDO/AIA observations of a fast coronal wave from an X2.1 flare. It measures local increases in density of 6-8% and in temperature of 10-18% as the wave passes. The temperature rise is larger than what compressional adiabatic heating would produce for the observed density change. The authors conclude that extra heating, possibly from magnetic reconnection or wave mode conversion, is occurring. They also attribute the wave's temporary disappearance in some channels to the effects of associated coronal dimming combined with this heating.

Core claim

The wave passage causes increases of 6-8% in density and 10-18% in temperature. While the density increase is comparable to earlier reports, the temperature increase exceeds expectations. This indicates that the temperature enhancement cannot be explained by compressional adiabatic heating alone, and instead suggests the presence of additional heating mechanisms, such as magnetic reconnection or wave mode conversion. During the temporary disappearance of the wave, the plasma parameters at the wave front increase, but with a strong spatial variability, with density increases ranging from 1% to 10%. The initial temperature in the affected area is notably higher than typical quiet-Sun regions (

What carries the argument

Differential emission measure (DEM) inversion from SDO/AIA EUV channels to derive local density, temperature, emission measure, and DEM distributions and their temporal evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The DEM inversion from AIA channels accurately recovers the true local density and temperature without major line-of-sight integration biases or contamination from the CME-associated dimming region.

What would settle it

Direct measurements showing that the observed temperature increase exactly matches the adiabatic compression value expected from the measured density increase would falsify the need for additional heating mechanisms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20368 by Amaia Razquin, Astrid M. Veronig, Karin Dissauer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the EUV wave event on 6 September 2011 observed in SDO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Evolution of the mean intensity within the ROI for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative evolution of the plasma parameters derived from the DEM analysis within the arc-shaped ROI. We show the temporal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Base-ratio maps of the mean weighted temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time evolution of the density ρ (top row) and mean weighted temperature T¯ (middle row) for four representative patches along the EUV wave propagation (indicated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: DEM distributions for the four representative patches (columns: east, centre, west, and north; see Fig. 1). The top row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: PFSS extrapolation of field lines surrounding the ROI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Large-scale coronal waves are globally propagating intensity enhancements in extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-ray (SXR) observations, associated with solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). They are interpreted as low-coronal signatures of a large-amplitude fast magnetosonic wave. On 6 September 2011, a fast (v = 1000 km/s) large-scale coronal wave accompanied an eruptive X2.1 class flare. A segment of the wave front temporarily dissappeared in EUV channels sensitive to quiet-Sun plasma, while it remained visible in higher temperature channels. We apply differential emission measure (DEM) diagnostics to SDO/AIA EUV observations to derive local density, temperature, emission measure, and DEM distributions, and examine their temporal evolution during the wave passage. The wave passage causes increases of 6-8% in density and 10-18% in temperature. While the density increase is comparable to earlier reports, the temperature increase exceeds expectations. This indicates that the temperature enhancement cannot be explained by compressional adiabatic heating alone, and instead suggests the presence of additional heating mechanisms, such as magnetic reconnection or wave mode conversion. During the temporary disappearance of the wave, the plasma parameters at the wave front increase, but with a strong spatial variability, with density increases ranging from 1% to 10%. The initial temperature in the affected area is notably higher than typical quiet-Sun regions (T > 1.7 MK), which allows plasma to be heated beyond the peak response of the AIA 193 and 211 \AA channels. We conclude that the apparent temporary disappearance of the wave front is primarily due to the combined effects in the intensity of the CME-associated coronal dimming following the wave and the wave itself, with heating further reducing its detectability in channels sensitive to quiet-Sun temperatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the 6 September 2011 large-scale coronal wave using differential emission measure (DEM) inversion of SDO/AIA EUV observations. It reports 6-8% density increases and 10-18% temperature increases at the wave front, concludes that the temperature rise exceeds expectations from adiabatic compression alone (suggesting additional heating via reconnection or mode conversion), and attributes the temporary disappearance of the wave in quiet-Sun channels to combined CME dimming and heating effects, noting initial temperatures >1.7 MK.

Significance. If robust, the result would provide direct observational constraints on non-adiabatic heating in fast-mode coronal waves, with implications for coronal energy balance and wave dissipation models. The work leverages public multi-channel AIA data for time-resolved local parameter estimation, which is a methodological strength for this class of event studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the observed 10-18% temperature increase indicates additional heating (beyond the ~4-5% expected from adiabatic compression for a 6-8% density rise with γ=5/3) rests on the DEM-derived local T and n values. No quantitative assessment is provided of possible systematic biases in the DEM inversion arising from line-of-sight integration through the overlapping CME-associated dimming region that follows the wave, which the manuscript itself links to the temporary disappearance and which could alter recovered emission measures and temperatures (especially at T>1.7 MK where AIA 193/211 Å responses drop).
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported percentage changes in density and temperature lack accompanying uncertainty estimates or error bars, making it impossible to evaluate whether the temperature enhancement is statistically distinguishable from the adiabatic expectation or from inversion noise.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit description of the DEM inversion algorithm, temperature binning, and any regularization or background subtraction choices used to derive the local parameters.
  2. Consider including a brief comparison of the observed wave speed (1000 km/s) with expected fast-mode speeds based on the derived pre-wave densities and temperatures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both points identify genuine gaps in the current version, and we will revise the manuscript to address them.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that the observed 10-18% temperature increase indicates additional heating (beyond the ~4-5% expected from adiabatic compression for a 6-8% density rise with γ=5/3) rests on the DEM-derived local T and n values. No quantitative assessment is provided of possible systematic biases in the DEM inversion arising from line-of-sight integration through the overlapping CME-associated dimming region that follows the wave, which the manuscript itself links to the temporary disappearance and which could alter recovered emission measures and temperatures (especially at T>1.7 MK where AIA 193/211 Å responses drop).

    Authors: We agree that no quantitative assessment of line-of-sight biases from the overlapping dimming region is provided, even though the manuscript discusses the dimming's role in the wave's temporary disappearance and notes initial temperatures above 1.7 MK. While our DEM analysis follows established AIA inversion methods and region selection was performed to focus on the wave front, this omission leaves open the possibility of systematic effects on the recovered parameters. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of these potential biases, including any feasible tests or sensitivity estimates. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The reported percentage changes in density and temperature lack accompanying uncertainty estimates or error bars, making it impossible to evaluate whether the temperature enhancement is statistically distinguishable from the adiabatic expectation or from inversion noise.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of uncertainty estimates prevents a proper statistical evaluation of whether the 10-18% temperature rise exceeds the adiabatic expectation. The revised manuscript will include quantified uncertainties (derived from the DEM inversion uncertainties and standard error propagation) on the reported 6-8% density and 10-18% temperature increases, both in the abstract and the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational DEM analysis with independent data comparison.

full rationale

The paper applies standard DEM inversion techniques to public SDO/AIA EUV observations to measure density and temperature changes during a coronal wave. The central claim compares observed 10-18% temperature rise against adiabatic compression expectations (~4-5% for the measured 6-8% density increase). No equations, parameters, or conclusions reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain consists of data processing followed by comparison to external theoretical expectations (γ=5/3 adiabatic), which are independent of the present measurements. The reader's assigned score of 2.0 is consistent with this assessment; the skeptic concern addresses potential observational bias (LOS effects) rather than circularity in the logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard assumptions of the DEM technique applied to optically thin EUV emission; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DEM inversion from AIA EUV channels recovers accurate local temperature and density under the assumption of optically thin plasma and known instrument response functions.
    Standard premise of solar EUV DEM diagnostics invoked to derive the reported density and temperature changes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5882 in / 1141 out tokens · 14330 ms · 2026-06-26T15:26:40.923167+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2008, , 685, 622

    Asai , A., Hara , H., Watanabe , T., et al. 2008, , 685, 622

    2008

  2. [2]

    T., Isobe , H., et al

    Asai , A., Ishii , T. T., Isobe , H., et al. 2012, , 745, L18

    2012

  3. [3]

    Aschwanden , M. J. 2005, Physics of the Solar Corona. An Introduction with Problems and Solutions (Springer)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Attrill , G. D. R., Harra , L. K., van Driel-Gesztelyi , L., & D \'e moulin , P. 2007, , 656, L101

    2007

  5. [5]

    2012, , 275, 41

    Boerner , P., Edwards , C., Lemen , J., et al. 2012, , 275, 41

    2012

  6. [6]

    F., Joshi , R., Joshi , B., & Schmieder , B

    Chandra , R., Chen , P. F., Joshi , R., Joshi , B., & Schmieder , B. 2018, , 863, 101

    2018

  7. [7]

    Chen , P. F. 2016, Geophysical Monograph Series, 216, 381

    2016

  8. [8]

    F., Fang , C., Chandra , R., & Srivastava , A

    Chen , P. F., Fang , C., Chandra , R., & Srivastava , A. K. 2016, , 291, 3195

    2016

  9. [9]

    F., Wu , S

    Chen , P. F., Wu , S. T., Shibata , K., & Fang , C. 2002, , 572, L99

    2002

  10. [10]

    Chen , P. F. & Wu , Y. 2011, , 732, L20

    2011

  11. [11]

    2012 a , , 745, L5

    Cheng , X., Zhang , J., Olmedo , O., et al. 2012 a , , 745, L5

    2012

  12. [12]

    H., & Ding , M

    Cheng , X., Zhang , J., Saar , S. H., & Ding , M. D. 2012 b , , 761, 62

    2012

  13. [13]

    P., Young , P

    Del Zanna , G., Dere , K. P., Young , P. R., & Landi , E. 2021, , 909, 38

    2021

  14. [14]

    E., Brunaud , J., et al

    Delaboudini \`e re , J.-P., Artzner , G. E., Brunaud , J., et al. 1995, , 162, 291

    1995

  15. [15]

    2014, , 289, 2565

    Delann \'e e , C., Artzner , G., Schmieder , B., & Parenti , S. 2014, , 289, 2565

    2014

  16. [16]

    & Aulanier , G

    Delann \'e e , C. & Aulanier , G. 1999, , 190, 107

    1999

  17. [17]

    Dennis , B. R. & Phillips , K. J. H. 2024, , 299, 48

    2024

  18. [18]

    P., Landi , E., Mason , H

    Dere , K. P., Landi , E., Mason , H. E., Monsignori Fossi , B. C., & Young , P. R. 1997, , 125, 149

    1997

  19. [19]

    M., Vanninathan , K., & Magdaleni \'c , J

    Dissauer , K., Temmer , M., Veronig , A. M., Vanninathan , K., & Magdaleni \'c , J. 2016, , 830, 92

    2016

  20. [20]

    M., Temmer , M., Podladchikova , T., & Vanninathan , K

    Dissauer , K., Veronig , A. M., Temmer , M., Podladchikova , T., & Vanninathan , K. 2018 a , , 855, 137

    2018

  21. [21]

    M., Temmer , M., Podladchikova , T., & Vanninathan , K

    Dissauer , K., Veronig , A. M., Temmer , M., Podladchikova , T., & Vanninathan , K. 2018 b , , 863, 169

    2018

  22. [22]

    Domingo , V., Fleck , B., & Poland , A. I. 1995, , 162, 1

    1995

  23. [23]

    I., van der Holst , B., Lugaz , N., & Sokolov , I

    Downs , C., Roussev , I. I., van der Holst , B., Lugaz , N., & Sokolov , I. V. 2012, , 750, 134

    2012

  24. [24]

    2002, , 54, 481

    Eto , S., Isobe , H., Narukage , N., et al. 2002, , 54, 481

    2002

  25. [25]

    2013, , 765, 37

    Feng , L., Wiegelmann , T., Su , Y., et al. 2013, , 765, 37

    2013

  26. [26]

    2020, , 295, 124

    Frassati , F., Mancuso , S., & Bemporad , A. 2020, , 295, 124

    2020

  27. [27]

    Gallagher , P. T. & Long , D. M. 2011, , 158, 365

    2011

  28. [28]

    2009, , 691, L123

    Gopalswamy , N., Yashiro , S., Temmer , M., et al. 2009, , 691, L123

    2009

  29. [29]

    Hannah , I. G. & Kontar , E. P. 2012, , 539, A146

    2012

  30. [30]

    K., Sterling , A

    Harra , L. K., Sterling , A. C., G \"o m \"o ry , P., & Veronig , A. 2011, , 737, L4

    2011

  31. [31]

    S., Acton , L

    Hudson , H. S., Acton , L. W., & Freeland , S. L. 1996, , 470, 629

    1996

  32. [32]

    2016, , 591, A141

    Janvier , M., Savcheva , A., Pariat , E., et al. 2016, , 591, A141

    2016

  33. [33]

    W., Temmer , M., & Veronig , A

    Kienreich , I. W., Temmer , M., & Veronig , A. M. 2009, , 703, L118

    2009

  34. [34]

    Klassen , A., Aurass , H., Mann , G., & Thompson , B. J. 2000, , 141, 357

    2000

  35. [35]

    A., Korreck , K

    Kozarev , K. A., Korreck , K. E., Lobzin , V. V., Weber , M. A., & Schwadron , N. A. 2011, , 733, L25

    2011

  36. [36]

    F., Bong , S.-C., & Park , S.-H

    Kumar , P., Cho , K.-S., Chen , P. F., Bong , S.-C., & Park , S.-H. 2013, , 282, 523

    2013

  37. [37]

    & Manoharan , P

    Kumar , P. & Manoharan , P. K. 2013, , 553, A109

    2013

  38. [38]

    M., Karpen , J

    Kumar , P., Nakariakov , V. M., Karpen , J. T., & Cho , K.-S. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 2667

    2024

  39. [39]

    R., Title , A

    Lemen , J. R., Title , A. M., Akin , D. J., et al. 2012, , 275, 17

    2012

  40. [40]

    2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68, 259611

    Li, J., Zheng, R., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68, 259611

    2025

  41. [41]

    W., Guo , J

    Li , Y. W., Guo , J. H., Ni , Y. W., Zhang , Z. Y., & Chen , P. F. 2025, , 698, A316

    2025

  42. [42]

    2019, , 870, 15

    Liu , R., Wang , Y., Lee , J., & Shen , C. 2019, , 870, 15

    2019

  43. [43]

    & Ofman , L

    Liu , W. & Ofman , L. 2014, , 289, 3233

    2014

  44. [44]

    V., et al

    Liu , W., Ofman , L., Nitta , N. V., et al. 2012, , 753, 52

    2012

  45. [45]

    M., Bloomfield , D

    Long , D. M., Bloomfield , D. S., Chen , P. F., et al. 2017, , 292, 7

    2017

  46. [46]

    M., DeLuca , E

    Long , D. M., DeLuca , E. E., & Gallagher , P. T. 2011, , 741, L21

    2011

  47. [47]

    C., Golub , L., et al

    Ma , S., Raymond , J. C., Golub , L., et al. 2011, , 738, 160

    2011

  48. [48]

    Mann , G., Aurass , H., Klassen , A., Estel , C., & Thompson , B. J. 1999, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 446, 8th SOHO Workshop: Plasma Dynamics and Diagnostics in the Solar Transition Region and Corona, ed. J. C. Vial & B. Kaldeich-Sch \"u , 477

    1999

  49. [49]

    & Veronig , A

    Mann , G. & Veronig , A. M. 2023, , 676, A144

    2023

  50. [50]

    Moreton , G. E. & Ramsey , H. E. 1960, , 72, 357

    1960

  51. [51]

    1997, , 175, 571

    Moses , D., Clette , F., Delaboudini \`e re , J.-P., et al. 1997, , 175, 571

    1997

  52. [52]

    M., Kienreich , I

    Muhr , N., Veronig , A. M., Kienreich , I. W., Temmer , M., & Vr s nak , B. 2011, , 739, 89

    2011

  53. [53]

    M., Kienreich , I

    Muhr , N., Veronig , A. M., Kienreich , I. W., et al. 2014, , 289, 4563

    2014

  54. [54]

    V., Liu , W., Gopalswamy , N., & Yashiro , S

    Nitta , N. V., Liu , W., Gopalswamy , N., & Yashiro , S. 2014, , 289, 4589

    2014

  55. [55]

    V., Schrijver , C

    Nitta , N. V., Schrijver , C. J., Title , A. M., & Liu , W. 2013, , 776, 58

    2013

  56. [56]

    J., Nakai , H., Keiyama , A., et al

    Okamoto , T. J., Nakai , H., Keiyama , A., et al. 2004, , 608, 1124

    2004

  57. [57]

    2012, , 756, 143

    Olmedo , O., Vourlidas , A., Zhang , J., & Cheng , X. 2012, , 756, 143

    2012

  58. [58]

    & Vourlidas , A

    Patsourakos , S. & Vourlidas , A. 2012, , 281, 187

    2012

  59. [59]

    M., Stenborg , G., & Thernisien , A

    Patsourakos , S., Vourlidas , A., Wang , Y. M., Stenborg , G., & Thernisien , A. 2009, , 259, 49

    2009

  60. [60]

    D., Thompson , B

    Pesnell , W. D., Thompson , B. J., & Chamberlin , P. C. 2012, , 275, 3

    2012

  61. [61]

    & Berghmans , D

    Podladchikova , O. & Berghmans , D. 2005, , 228, 265

    2005

  62. [62]

    M., Dissauer , K., Temmer , M., & Podladchikova , O

    Podladchikova , T., Veronig , A. M., Dissauer , K., Temmer , M., & Podladchikova , O. 2019, , 877, 68

    2019

  63. [63]

    2020, , 903, 129

    Prasad , A., Dissauer , K., Hu , Q., et al. 2020, , 903, 129

    2020

  64. [64]

    M., Dickson , E

    Purkhart , S., Veronig , A. M., Dickson , E. C. M., et al. 2023, , 679, A99

    2023

  65. [65]

    N., Jiang , L

    Qu , Z. N., Jiang , L. Q., & Chen , S. L. 2017, , 851, 41

    2017

  66. [66]

    M., & Barnes , G

    Razquin , A., Dissauer , K., Veronig , A. M., & Barnes , G. 2026, , 708, A292

    2026

  67. [67]

    J., Aulanier , G., Title , A

    Schrijver , C. J., Aulanier , G., Title , A. M., Pariat , E., & Delann \'e e , C. 2011, , 738, 167

    2011

  68. [68]

    J., Title , A

    Schrijver , C. J., Title , A. M., Yeates , A. R., & DeRosa , M. L. 2013, , 773, 93

    2013

  69. [69]

    T., et al

    Shen , Y., Ichimoto , K., Ishii , T. T., et al. 2014, , 786, 151

    2014

  70. [70]

    & Liu , Y

    Shen , Y. & Liu , Y. 2012, , 754, 7

    2012

  71. [71]

    2013, , 773, L33

    Shen , Y., Liu , Y., Su , J., et al. 2013, , 773, L33

    2013

  72. [72]

    Stansby, D., Yeates, A., & Badman, S. T. 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2732

    2020

  73. [73]

    Sterling , A. C. & Hudson , H. S. 1997, , 491, L55

    1997

  74. [74]

    J., Gurman , J

    Thompson , B. J., Gurman , J. B., Neupert , W. M., et al. 1999, , 517, L151

    1999

  75. [75]

    J., Plunkett , S

    Thompson , B. J., Plunkett , S. P., Gurman , J. B., et al. 1998, , 25, 2465

    1998

  76. [76]

    & Raouafi , N.-E

    Tripathi , D. & Raouafi , N.-E. 2007, , 473, 951

    2007

  77. [77]

    1968, , 4, 30

    Uchida , Y. 1968, , 4, 30

    1968

  78. [78]

    M., Dissauer , K., et al

    Vanninathan , K., Veronig , A. M., Dissauer , K., et al. 2015, , 812, 173

    2015

  79. [79]

    M., Dissauer , K., & Temmer , M

    Vanninathan , K., Veronig , A. M., Dissauer , K., & Temmer , M. 2018, , 857, 62

    2018

  80. [80]

    M., Dissauer , K., Kliem , B., et al

    Veronig , A. M., Dissauer , K., Kliem , B., et al. 2025, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 22, 2

    2025

Showing first 80 references.