pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22455 · v1 · pith:URCRPQDLnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.SR

Magnetic field strengths of hot giant exoplanets consistent with Solar System values

Julia V. Seidel , Vivien Parmentier , Bibiana Prinoth , Thea Hood , Nishil Mehta , Valentin De Lia , Konstantin Batygin , Tristan Guillot
show 24 more authors
Ragnar Van den Broeck Hayley Beltz Brian Thorsbro Florian Debras Daniel D. B. Koll Thaddeus D. Komacek Emily Rauscher Lorenzo Pino Matteo Brogi Joost P. Wardenier Jacob L. Bean Bj\"orn Benneke Jean-Michel L. B. D\'esert Pablo Drake Siddharth Gandhi Mark Hammond David Kasper Michael R. Line Elspeth K. H. Lee Stefan Pelletier Andreas Seifahrt Adrien Simonnin Peter C. B. Smith Kevin B. Stevenson
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords ultra-hot Jupitersmagnetic fieldsatmospheric windsDoppler spectroscopyexoplanet atmospheresmagnetic dragiron lines
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observations of seven ultra-hot Jupiters show wind speeds decreasing with temperature, implying magnetic field strengths of at most a few gauss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses high-resolution spectroscopy of iron lines during transits to measure Doppler shifts and thus atmospheric wind speeds on seven ultra-hot Jupiters. It reports a clear trend of slower winds at higher planetary temperatures. This trend cannot be explained by hydrodynamic models but matches predictions from models that include magnetic drag on the ionized atmosphere. Applying the magnetic drag relation to the data yields an upper limit on the planets' magnetic field strengths of a few gauss. The result supplies an observational anchor for theoretical predictions of magnetic fields across exoplanets.

Core claim

High-spectral-resolution transit observations reveal that wind speeds in ultra-hot Jupiters decrease with increasing equilibrium temperature; this relation is reproduced by atmospheric models that incorporate magnetic drag but not by purely hydrodynamic models, leading to an estimate that the magnetic field strengths of hot giant planets are at most a few gauss.

What carries the argument

Magnetic drag on the ionized upper atmosphere, which strengthens with temperature and thereby reduces wind speeds, used to convert the observed temperature-wind-speed trend into a field-strength upper limit.

If this is right

  • Magnetic fields shape the atmospheric circulation of ultra-hot Jupiters.
  • Magnetic field strengths of hot giant planets lie in the same range as Solar-System values.
  • The relation supplies a benchmark for scaling laws that predict magnetic fields on exoplanets from hot Jupiters to rocky worlds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar spectroscopy on cooler hot Jupiters could test whether the same magnetic-drag scaling holds outside the ultra-hot regime.
  • The field-strength limit bears on models of atmospheric escape and long-term retention for these planets.
  • If the drag interpretation is correct, future direct magnetic-field detections should find values near a few gauss rather than much higher.

Load-bearing premise

The measured drop in wind speed with rising temperature is produced by magnetic drag rather than other unmodeled atmospheric processes.

What would settle it

A set of wind-speed measurements for ultra-hot Jupiters that show no decrease with temperature or that imply field strengths orders of magnitude above a few gauss.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22455 by Adrien Simonnin, Andreas Seifahrt, Bibiana Prinoth, Bj\"orn Benneke, Brian Thorsbro, Daniel D. B. Koll, David Kasper, Elspeth K. H. Lee, Emily Rauscher, Florian Debras, Hayley Beltz, Jacob L. Bean, Jean-Michel L. B. D\'esert, Joost P. Wardenier, Julia V. Seidel, Kevin B. Stevenson, Konstantin Batygin, Lorenzo Pino, Mark Hammond, Matteo Brogi, Michael R. Line, Nishil Mehta, Pablo Drake, Peter C. B. Smith, Ragnar Van den Broeck, Siddharth Gandhi, Stefan Pelletier, Thaddeus D. Komacek, Thea Hood, Tristan Guillot, Valentin De Lia, Vivien Parmentier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A clear trend of decreasing wind speeds with equilibrium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ohmic drag models reproduce the observed trend of decreasing velocities. We show the measured velocities as data points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ultra-hot Jupiters have maximum atmospheric magnetic field strength compatible with Jovian values. We show the derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic fields are ubiquitous in the universe. They play a key role in shaping the activity of stars, the habitability of rocky planets, and the long-term retention of planetary atmospheres. Theoretical scaling laws are largely constrained by the limited set of stars and Solar System planets, leading to a wide range of possible values for hot giant planets outside of the Solar System from fractions of the Jovian field to orders of magnitude larger. Ultra-hot Jupiters, with their highly ionised atmospheres, provide a new avenue to probe magnetic effects, as their atmospheric circulation could be directly sensitive to atmospheric magnetic field strength. Using high-spectral resolution observations targeting the iron lines of ultra-hot Jupiters we measure the Doppler shift and thus the wind speed of seven transiting ultra-hot Jupiters. We find a clear decrease of wind speed with increasing planetary temperature, a trend inconsistent with purely hydrodynamic mechanisms but naturally reproduced by magnetic drag. From this relation we estimate the possible strength of magnetic fields of hot giant planets to at most a few gauss - comparable to the Jovian equatorial field. Our results support the idea that magnetic fields affect the atmospheric circulation of ultra-hot Jupiters and could provide a crucial benchmark for scaling laws used to predict magnetic fields in exoplanets, from hot Jupiters to rocky Earths with additional implications for future direct observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports high-spectral-resolution observations targeting iron lines in seven transiting ultra-hot Jupiters, from which Doppler shifts are used to measure atmospheric wind speeds. A clear anti-correlation is found between wind speed and planetary equilibrium temperature. This trend is stated to be inconsistent with purely hydrodynamic circulation models but naturally reproduced by a magnetic-drag model. From the observed relation the authors infer that magnetic field strengths in hot giant planets are at most a few gauss, comparable to Jupiter's equatorial field. The results are presented as supporting magnetic effects on ultra-hot Jupiter circulation and as an empirical benchmark for exoplanet magnetic-field scaling laws.

Significance. If the central mapping from observed wind speeds to field strength is robust, the work supplies a rare observational anchor for magnetic-field predictions in exoplanets, extending beyond the limited Solar-System sample. It directly links an observable atmospheric diagnostic to an interior property and carries implications for atmospheric retention, future direct imaging, and theoretical dynamo scaling relations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the data support a field-strength upper limit of a few gauss rests on the assertion that the wind-temperature anti-correlation is 'naturally reproduced by magnetic drag' and that the conversion is parameter-free. No error bars on the measured wind speeds, no tabulated data, no explicit model equations, and no exclusion criteria for alternative processes (ionization, radiative timescale, or cloud effects) are supplied, rendering the claim unverifiable from the presented material.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the magnetic-field estimate is obtained by relating the observed wind-temperature trend to a magnetic-drag model. The text gives no indication that the model's functional form or parameters were fixed independently of the present dataset (e.g., via Solar-System validation or first-principles derivation), raising the possibility that the derived B value is shaped by the same data used to infer it.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the observed trend is inconsistent with hydrodynamic mechanisms but reproduced by magnetic drag requires demonstration that other temperature-dependent processes cannot produce a comparable anti-correlation. No such comparative analysis or exclusion test is described.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the number of planets, the typical uncertainty on the wind-speed measurements, and the temperature range spanned by the sample.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below in a point-by-point manner. We agree that the abstract can be clarified to better direct readers to supporting details in the main text and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the data support a field-strength upper limit of a few gauss rests on the assertion that the wind-temperature anti-correlation is 'naturally reproduced by magnetic drag' and that the conversion is parameter-free. No error bars on the measured wind speeds, no tabulated data, no explicit model equations, and no exclusion criteria for alternative processes (ionization, radiative timescale, or cloud effects) are supplied, rendering the claim unverifiable from the presented material.

    Authors: The abstract serves as a concise summary; the full manuscript supplies error bars on all reported wind speeds (Table 1 and Figures 2-3), the complete tabulated dataset, the explicit magnetic-drag model equations (Section 3.2, derived from Lorentz force balance), and discussion of alternative processes (Section 4). We will revise the abstract to reference these elements and their locations in the main text for improved verifiability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the magnetic-field estimate is obtained by relating the observed wind-temperature trend to a magnetic-drag model. The text gives no indication that the model's functional form or parameters were fixed independently of the present dataset (e.g., via Solar-System validation or first-principles derivation), raising the possibility that the derived B value is shaped by the same data used to infer it.

    Authors: The functional form of the magnetic-drag model (including the temperature dependence through ionization fraction) follows from first-principles MHD considerations and was validated against Solar-System field strengths in prior theoretical work, independent of the current observations. The exoplanet data are used solely to constrain the overall amplitude of B after confirming the predicted trend shape; no parameters were adjusted to fit this dataset. This separation is explained in the methods and discussion. revision: no

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the observed trend is inconsistent with hydrodynamic mechanisms but reproduced by magnetic drag requires demonstration that other temperature-dependent processes cannot produce a comparable anti-correlation. No such comparative analysis or exclusion test is described.

    Authors: Section 4 already compares the observed trend against published hydrodynamic circulation models (which lack the anti-correlation) and against magnetic-drag predictions. Brief arguments are also given that ionization fraction changes, radiative timescale variations, and cloud effects would not reproduce the specific observed slope. To make the exclusion more explicit, we will add a short dedicated paragraph with quantitative estimates of these alternatives. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

B-field estimate obtained by fitting observed wind-temperature trend to magnetic-drag model

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [abstract]
    "We find a clear decrease of wind speed with increasing planetary temperature, a trend inconsistent with purely hydrodynamic mechanisms but naturally reproduced by magnetic drag. From this relation we estimate the possible strength of magnetic fields of hot giant planets to at most a few gauss - comparable to the Jovian equatorial field."

    The wind-temperature data are used both to select the magnetic-drag explanation and to extract the numerical B value; the 'estimate' is therefore the output of fitting the model to the same observations rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper measures wind speeds, observes an anti-correlation with temperature, states that magnetic drag reproduces the trend, and then estimates B ≲ few G directly from that same relation. No independent anchor (Solar-System calibration, parameter-free derivation, or external validation) is shown in the provided text for the drag-to-B conversion; the derived field strength therefore reduces to a quantity shaped by the chosen model applied to the present dataset.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Assessment is limited to the abstract; full model equations, parameter values, and data-processing steps are unavailable, so the ledger records only the explicit interpretive assumption stated in the summary.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The observed wind-speed versus temperature trend is produced by magnetic drag
    The abstract asserts that the trend is naturally reproduced by magnetic drag but does not detail why alternative mechanisms are excluded or how the model was calibrated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5929 in / 1338 out tokens · 50330 ms · 2026-06-26T10:02:25.721697+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 289 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume =

    Magnetohydrodynamic shock waves in molecular clouds , volume =. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1983 , pages =. doi:10.1086/160617 , language =

    work page doi:10.1086/160617 1983

  2. [2]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    A. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1002/2018GL077312 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/2018gl077312 2018

  3. [3]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    The hot dayside and asymmetric transit of. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038677 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038677 2020

  4. [4]

    Scott and Rodriguez, Joseph E

    Martínez, Romy Rodríguez and Gaudi, B. Scott and Rodriguez, Joseph E. and Zhou, George and Labadie-Bartz, Jonathan and Quinn, Samuel N. and Penev, Kaloyan Minev and Tan, Thiam-Guan and Latham, David W. and Paredes, Leonardo A. and Kielkopf, John and Addison, Brett C. and Wright, Duncan J. and Teske, Johanna K. and Howell, Steve B. and Ciardi, David R. and...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01017 1912

  5. [5]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Three irradiated and bloated hot. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527276 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527276 2016

  6. [6]

    2016 , pages =

    The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/45 , number =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/45 2016

  7. [7]

    and Rainer, M

    The. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935718 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935718 2019

  8. [8]

    2025 , pages =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1648 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1648 2025

  9. [9]

    and Wang, Ji and Asnodkar, Anusha Pai and Petz, Sydney and Duck, Alison and Strassmeier, Klaus G

    Lenhart, Calder and Johnson, Marshall C. and Wang, Ji and Asnodkar, Anusha Pai and Petz, Sydney and Duck, Alison and Strassmeier, Klaus G. and Ilyin, Ilya , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2503.07719 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.07719

  10. [10]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Size and. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac6e8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac6e8 2018

  11. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Magnetic induction processes in hot. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2849 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2849 2022

  12. [12]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Inflated hot. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555219 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555219 2025

  13. [13]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Rossby. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf057 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf057 2025

  14. [14]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Magnetic field evolution of hot exoplanets , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2505 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2505 2024

  15. [15]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Estimating the. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa93fd , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa93fd 2017

  16. [16]

    2010 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1060 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1060 2010

  17. [17]

    Lichtenberg, Tim and Miguel, Yamila , month = may, year =. Super-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.04057 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04057

  18. [18]

    and Graham, Matthew , month = oct, year =

    Malsky, Isaac and Kataria, Tiffany and Batalha, Natasha E. and Graham, Matthew , month = oct, year =. Accelerating. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.27050 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.27050

  19. [19]

    and Gonzalez-Gaitan, S

    Pereira, B. and Gonzalez-Gaitan, S. and Mourao, A. M. and Rino-Silvestre, J. and Paulino-Afonso, A. and Anderson, J. P. and Cikota, A. and Morales-Garoffolo, A. , month = oct, year =. Moonlit sky polarization patterns from. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.27308 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.27308

  20. [20]

    Exoplanet climate characterization with transit asymmetries -- A comprehensive population study from the optical to the infrared

    Carone, Ludmila and Helling, Christiane and Gernjak, Sebastian and Leitner, Hanna and Janz, Tamara , month = nov, year =. Exoplanet climate characterization with transit asymmetries --. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.01548 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.01548

  21. [21]

    2025 , pages =

    arXiv e-prints , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.12737 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.12737 2025

  22. [22]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Atmospheric. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/180 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/180 2015

  23. [23]

    Goodis and Karalidi, Theodora and Bott, Kimberly M

    Gordon, Kenneth E. Goodis and Karalidi, Theodora and Bott, Kimberly M. and Vancil, Connor J. and Millar-Blanchaer, Maxwell A. and Wogan, Nicholas F. and Wolf, Eric T. , month = sep, year =. Polarized. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.16338 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16338

  24. [24]

    An idealized general circulation model for the atmospheric circulation on the ice giants , url =

    Guendelman, Ilai and Kaspi, Yoahi , month = sep, year =. An idealized general circulation model for the atmospheric circulation on the ice giants , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.17217 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.17217

  25. [25]

    and R, Dhanush S

    Bestha, Manjunath and Unni, Athira and Sivarani, T. and R, Dhanush S. and Manickavasaham, Lokesh and M, Parvathy and Divakar, Devika K. and Surya, Arun , month = sep, year =. A multi-object approach for studying exoplanet atmospheres using high-resolution spectrographs , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.18721 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18721

  26. [26]

    arXiv e-prints , author =

    The impact of stellar winds and tidal locking effects on the habitability of. arXiv e-prints , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.20417 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.20417 2025

  27. [27]

    arXiv e-prints , author =

    Constraining exoplanet interiors using observations of their atmospheres , url =. arXiv e-prints , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.08844 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08844 2025

  28. [28]

    and Kopparla, Pushkar and Li, Jiazheng and Yung, Yuk L

    Wiktorowicz, Sloane J. and Kopparla, Pushkar and Li, Jiazheng and Yung, Yuk L. , month = sep, year =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.19172 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19172

  29. [29]

    Estimating the magnetic field strength in hot Jupiters

    Yadav, Rakesh K. and Thorngren, Daniel P. , month = oct, year =. Estimating the magnetic field strength in hot. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1709.05676 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.05676

  30. [30]

    and G, Zhilkin A

    A, Babenko I. and G, Zhilkin A. , month = sep, year =. Evaluation of the magnetic field of hot. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.16565 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16565

  31. [31]

    and Gupta, Arvind F

    O'Brien, Shane and Wong, Amber and Han, Te and Robertson, Paul and Kanodia, Shubham and Cañas, Caleb I. and Gupta, Arvind F. and Swaby, Tera and Kobulnicky, Henry A. and Morrell, Nidia and Rodruck, Michael and Lin, Andrea S. J. and Monson, Andrew and Cochran, William D. and Bender, Chad F. and Diddams, Scott A. and Halverson, Samuel and Krolikowski, Danie...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.11798

  32. [32]

    Simulating

    Bugatti, Maddalena and Lovis, Christophe and Billot, Nicolas and Blind, Nicolas and Lavie, Baptiste and Turbet, Martin and Chazelas, Bruno and Pepe, Francesco , month = sep, year =. Simulating. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.07644 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.07644

  33. [33]

    2016 , pages =

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/99 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/99 2016

  34. [34]

    and Cowan, Nicolas B

    Splinter, Jared and Coulombe, Louis-Philippe and Frazier, Robert C. and Cowan, Nicolas B. and Rauscher, Emily and Dang, Lisa and Radica, Michael and Collins, Sean and Pelletier, Stefan and Allart, Romain and MacDonald, Ryan J. and Lafrenière, David and Albert, Loïc and Benneke, Björn and Doyon, René and Jayawardhana, Ray and Johnstone, Doug and Krishnamur...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09760

  35. [35]

    Sithajan, Sirinrat and Kaewbiang, Lalita and Jones, Hugh R. A. and Rittipruk, Pakakaew and Meethong, Sukanya , year =. Identification of. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2509.06496 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06496

  36. [36]

    Nature , author =

    Jupiter’s atmospheric jet streams extend thousands of kilometres deep , volume =. Nature , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature25793 , language =

    work page doi:10.1038/nature25793 2018

  37. [37]

    Mechanisms of

    Mechanisms of. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1175/2010JAS3492.1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1175/2010jas3492.1 2010

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Up,. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad772f , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad772f 2024

  39. [39]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    The. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab43d0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab43d0 2019

  40. [40]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Doppler. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/24 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/1/24 2013

  41. [41]

    On the radiative equilibrium of irradiated planetary atmospheres

    On the radiative equilibrium of irradiated planetary atmospheres , volume =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913396 , abstract =

    work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913396 2010

  42. [42]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics, Volume 692, id.A113, 19 pp

    Breaking degeneracies in exoplanetary parameters through self-consistent atmosphere–interior modelling , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Volume 692, id.A113, 19 pp. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348945 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348945 2024

  43. [43]

    Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications

  44. [44]

    The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 714, Issue 1, pp

    Gravity. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 714, Issue 1, pp. 904-914 (2010). , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/904 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/904 2010

  45. [45]

    Modelling magnetic star-planet interaction in the iconic

    Peña-Moñino, Luis and Pérez-Torres, Miguel , month = aug, year =. Modelling magnetic star-planet interaction in the iconic. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20891 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20891

  46. [46]

    and Oklopčić, A

    Nail, F. and Oklopčić, A. and MacLeod, M. and Baka, K. and Czesla, S. and Nagel, E. and Linssen, D. and Matthijsse, J. , month = aug, year =. Probing the extent of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20572 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20572

  47. [47]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    The effect of tidal locking on the magnetospheric and atmospheric evolution of ``. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035684 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035684 2004

  48. [48]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 5, article id

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 129, Issue 5, article id. e2024JA032422 , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2024JA032422 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2024ja032422 2024

  49. [49]

    Nature Communications, Volume 14, article id

    Drifting discrete. Nature Communications, Volume 14, article id. 5981 , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41617-8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41617-8 2023

  50. [50]

    and Lafrenière, David and Cowan, Nicolas B

    Pelletier, Stefan and Coulombe, Louis-Philippe and Splinter, Jared and Benneke, Björn and MacDonald, Ryan J. and Lafrenière, David and Cowan, Nicolas B. and Allart, Romain and Rauscher, Emily and Frazier, Robert C. and Meyer, Michael R. and Albert, Loïc and Dang, Lisa and Doyon, René and Ehrenreich, David and Flagg, Laura and Johnstone, Doug and Langeveld...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18341

  51. [51]

    and Seidler, Fabian and Sossi, Paolo A

    Hakim, Kaustubh and Bower, Dan J. and Seidler, Fabian and Sossi, Paolo A. , month = aug, year =. Silane-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.19235 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19235

  52. [52]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Is ozone a reliable proxy for molecular oxygen?. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556015 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556015 2025

  53. [53]

    Boldt-Christmas, Linn and Rains, Adam D. and Piskunov, Nikolai and Nortmann, Lisa and Lesjak, Fabio and Cont, David and Kochukhov, Oleg and Hahlin, Axel and Lavail, Alexis and Marquart, Thomas and Heiter, Ulrike and Rengel, Miriam and Shulyak, Denis and Yan, Fei and Hatzes, Artie and Nagel, Evangelos and Reiners, Ansgar and Seemann, Ulf , month = aug, yea...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18964

  54. [54]

    J., Beatty, T

    A high internal heat flux and large core in a warm. Nature , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07514-w , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07514-w 2024

  55. [55]

    and Fortney, Jonathan J

    Thorngren, Daniel P. and Fortney, Jonathan J. , month = may, year =. Bayesian. The Astronomical Journal, Volume 155, Issue 5, article id. 214,. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaba13 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaba13

  56. [56]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    High-resolution transmission spectroscopy study of ultra-hot. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141799 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141799 2022

  57. [57]

    Smith, Peter C. B. and Sanchez, Jorge A. and Line, Michael R. and Rauscher, Emily and Weiner Mansfield, Megan and Kempton, Eliza M. -R. and Savel, Arjun and Wardenier, Joost P. and Pino, Lorenzo and Bean, Jacob L. and Beltz, Hayley and Panwar, Vatsal and Brogi, Matteo and Malsky, Isaac and Fortney, Jonathan and Desert, Jean-Michel and Pelletier, Stefan an...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.19017

  58. [58]

    Nature , author =

    A warm. Nature , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07395-z , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07395-z 2024

  59. [59]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Simonnin, A. and Parmentier, V. and Wardenier, J. P. and Chauvin, G. and Chiavassa, A. and N'Diaye, M. and Tan, X. and Heidari, N. and Bean, B. Prinoth J. and Hébrard, G. and Line, M. and Kitzmann, D. and Kasper, D. and Pelletier, S. and Seidel, J. V. and Seifhart, A. and Benneke, B. and Bonfils, X. and Brogi, M. and Désert, J.-M. and Gandhi, S. and Hammo...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.01472

  60. [60]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    The. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451937 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451937 2025

  61. [61]

    and Polvani, Lorenzo M

    Showman, Adam P. and Polvani, Lorenzo M. , month = sep, year =. Equatorial. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 738, Issue 1, article id. 71,. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/71 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/71

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Hot. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 531, Issue 1, pp.1056-1083 , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae984 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae984 2024

  63. [63]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    A. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc43f , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc43f 2025

  64. [64]

    and Barman, Travis and Koskinen, Tommi , month = oct, year =

    Lothringer, Joshua D. and Barman, Travis and Koskinen, Tommi , month = oct, year =. Extremely. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 866, Issue 1, article id. 27,. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadd9e , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadd9e

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    The shocking transit of. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Volume 416, Issue 1, pp. L41-L44. , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01093.x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01093.x 2011

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    A solar. Nature , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03912-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03912-6 2021

  67. [67]

    and Nortmann, L

    Lesjak, F. and Nortmann, L. and Cont, D. and Yan, F. and Reiners, A. and Piskunov, N. and Hatzes, A. and Boldt-Christmas, L. and Czesla, S. and Lavail, A. and Nagel, E. and Rains, A. D. and Rengel, M. and Seemann, U. and Shulyak, D. , month = nov, year =. Retrieving wind properties from the ultra-hot dayside of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2411.19662 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.19662

  68. [68]

    Koll, Daniel D. B. and Komacek, Thaddeus D. , month = feb, year =. Atmospheric. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3de , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3de

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Cloud property trends in hot and ultra-hot giant gas planets (. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039911 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039911 2021

  70. [70]

    2019 , pages =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2713 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2713 2019

  71. [71]

    The Astronomical Journal, Volume 168, Issue 1, id.4, 19 pp

    Two-dimensional. The Astronomical Journal, Volume 168, Issue 1, id.4, 19 pp. , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad434d , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad434d 2024

  72. [72]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac80bf , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac80bf 2022

  73. [73]

    Bello-Arufe, Aaron and Cabot, Samuel H. C. and Mendonça, João M. and Buchhave, Lars A. and Rathcke, Alexander D. , month = feb, year =. Mining the. The Astronomical Journal , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac402e , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac402e

  74. [74]

    Space Science Reviews, v

    Solar. Space Science Reviews, v. 92, Issue 1/2, p. 39-54 (2000). , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1023/A:1005293132737 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005293132737 2000

  75. [75]

    2020 , note =

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039234 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039234 2020

  76. [76]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Investigating the. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3207 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3207 2020

  77. [77]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    A transition between the hot and the ultra-hot. Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937394 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937394 2020

  78. [79]

    Magnetic

    Menou, Kristen , month = feb, year =. Magnetic. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 745, Issue 2, article id. 138,. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/138 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/138

  79. [80]

    and Cook, Neil J

    Bazinet, Luc and Allart, Romain and Benneke, Björn and Pelletier, Stefan and Wardenier, Joost P. and Cook, Neil J. and Forveille, Thierry and Nielsen, Louise D. and Moulla, Khaled Al and Artigau, Étienne and Baron, Frédérique and Barros, Susana C. C. and Bonfils, Xavier and Bouchy, François and Bryan, Marta and Martins, Bruno L. Canto and Cloutier, Ryan a...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06626

  80. [81]

    2018 , pages =

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2826 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2826 2018

Showing first 80 references.