pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22691 · v1 · pith:TKN3LVHVnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-th

Finite-volume scheme for first-order viscoresistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics

Ruben Lier , Jay Armas , Oliver Porth This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-th
keywords relativistic magnetohydrodynamicsBDNK theoryfinite-volume schemedissipative MHDviscoresistive fluidsprimitive recoverycausalityultra-relativistic limit
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite-volume scheme incorporates BDNK first-order corrections to produce causal and stable dissipative relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, with one extra term required in the ultra-relativistic limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical method that adds first-order dissipative corrections from BDNK theory directly into a finite-volume discretization of relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. These corrections convert standard diffusive evolution equations into telegrapher-type equations that respect causality without introducing new dynamical fields. The magnetic field is handled as a one-form charge whose dissipation couples to energy and momentum loss. In the ultra-relativistic regime an additional correction term is needed to keep the system stable. The resulting equations support an efficient primitive-variable recovery procedure that is tested on an analytic benchmark and multiple two-dimensional simulations.

Core claim

First-order BDNK corrections can be incorporated into a finite-volume scheme describing the coupled dissipation of energy, momentum, and magnetic field (treated as a one-form charge) while maintaining stability and causality; a minimal set of these terms converts diffusive equations into telegrapher-type equations, yet in the ultra-relativistic limit one additional correction is required for the system to remain stable and causal, enabling an efficient primitive-variable recovery method that is validated through an analytical benchmark and various two-dimensional simulations.

What carries the argument

BDNK first-order correction terms added to the finite-volume update of energy, momentum, and magnetic one-form charge, plus one extra ultra-relativistic correction term.

If this is right

  • Coupled dissipation of energy, momentum, and magnetic field occurs without extra dynamical variables.
  • Minimal BDNK terms turn diffusive equations into telegrapher-type equations.
  • One additional correction restores stability and causality in the ultra-relativistic limit.
  • An efficient primitive-variable recovery procedure becomes available for the corrected system.
  • The scheme passes an analytical benchmark and multiple two-dimensional test simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same correction structure could be tested in three-dimensional global simulations of neutron-star mergers or black-hole accretion.
  • The one-form treatment of the magnetic field suggests a route to include resistive effects in other first-order relativistic fluid theories.
  • The method might allow systematic comparison of first-order versus second-order dissipative formulations on identical grids.

Load-bearing premise

The BDNK first-order corrections can be added to the finite-volume scheme while preserving stability and causality in the ultra-relativistic limit with only one extra term.

What would settle it

A two-dimensional ultra-relativistic simulation using the reported correction set that nevertheless produces superluminal signal propagation or numerical instability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22691 by Jay Armas, Oliver Porth, Ruben Lier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the numerical output with the analytical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Convergence for the boosted telegraph solution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Shock tubes for a range of resistivities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Color plot of late-time tracer density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Color plot of the late-time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of lab frame energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Color plot of late-time energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of the out-of-plane current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of the maximum local front velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a numerical implementation of dissipative relativistic magnetohydrodynamics based on Bemfica-Disconzi-Noronha-Kovtun (BDNK) theory, in which first-order corrections render the equations causal without introducing additional dynamical variables. We show how these corrections can be incorporated in a finite-volume scheme describing the coupled dissipation of energy, momentum, and magnetic field, with the latter treated as a one-form charge. While a minimal set of BDNK terms can convert diffusive equations into telegrapher-type equations, we find that in the ultra-relativistic limit an additional correction is required for the system to behave in a stable and causal manner. With this set of equations, we develop an efficient method for primitive-variable recovery and validate the implementation through an analytical benchmark and various two-dimensional simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a finite-volume numerical scheme for first-order viscoresistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics based on BDNK theory. It incorporates first-order corrections to ensure causality without extra dynamical variables, treats the magnetic field as a one-form charge, derives an efficient primitive-variable recovery procedure, and reports that an additional correction term is required for stability and causality in the ultra-relativistic limit. Validation is claimed via an analytical benchmark and multiple 2D simulations.

Significance. If the stability and causality claims hold under quantitative scrutiny, the work supplies a practical numerical framework for including dissipative effects in relativistic MHD without introducing auxiliary fields, which is relevant for modeling high-energy astrophysical flows. The primitive-recovery algorithm is a concrete implementation contribution that could be adopted by other codes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and validation section] Abstract and § on validation: the claim of validation rests on an analytical benchmark and 2D simulations, yet no quantitative error norms, convergence rates, or L1/L2 residuals are reported; without these the central assertion that the scheme remains stable and causal cannot be assessed.
  2. [Ultra-relativistic limit discussion] Ultra-relativistic correction paragraph: the additional term is introduced after observing instabilities; the manuscript must supply either a systematic derivation from the BDNK stress-energy tensor or a controlled parameter study showing that the term is required independently of the specific test problems chosen.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Clarify throughout whether the magnetic-field evolution equation is written in conservative form or as a one-form charge; inconsistent notation appears in the abstract versus the scheme description.
  2. [Primitive recovery subsection] Provide the explicit algebraic expression for the primitive-recovery solver (including any iterative tolerances) so that the efficiency claim can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive suggestions. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and validation section] Abstract and § on validation: the claim of validation rests on an analytical benchmark and 2D simulations, yet no quantitative error norms, convergence rates, or L1/L2 residuals are reported; without these the central assertion that the scheme remains stable and causal cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error measures are necessary to rigorously support the stability and causality claims. In the revised manuscript we will add L1 and L2 error norms together with observed convergence rates for the analytical benchmark. For the 2D simulations we will report quantitative diagnostics such as global conservation residuals and, where reference solutions exist, pointwise or integrated error norms. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Ultra-relativistic limit discussion] Ultra-relativistic correction paragraph: the additional term is introduced after observing instabilities; the manuscript must supply either a systematic derivation from the BDNK stress-energy tensor or a controlled parameter study showing that the term is required independently of the specific test problems chosen.

    Authors: The correction was identified through numerical experiments that exhibited instabilities when only the minimal BDNK terms were retained at high Lorentz factors. A first-principles derivation of this specific term directly from the BDNK tensor is not available at present. We will therefore add a controlled parameter study that systematically varies the Lorentz factor and the dissipation coefficients across multiple problem classes, demonstrating that the term is required for stability and causality irrespective of the particular test configurations shown in the original manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical implementation with external validation; no circular derivation

full rationale

The paper describes a finite-volume numerical scheme for BDNK first-order dissipative relativistic MHD, including an efficient primitive-variable recovery method and one extra term for ultra-relativistic stability. The load-bearing elements are the adaptation of existing BDNK equations into a conservative form, the recovery algorithm, and direct validation against an analytical benchmark plus 2D simulations. These steps rely on independent external theory (BDNK) and falsifiable numerical tests rather than any self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation chain that collapses the result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Reviewed from abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. BDNK theory is treated as given background.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5663 in / 1087 out tokens · 24588 ms · 2026-06-26T09:32:15.819684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ideal MHD

    EQUATIONS OF MOTION In this work, we consider a relativistic magnetohydro- dynamic plasma. For simplicity, we focus on the ultra- relativistic limit where mass density does not play a role. To account for the dynamical magnetic field, we follow the one-formapproach [23, 24, 30, 31], which treats magnetic field lines as conserved string-like objects of cod...

  2. [2]

    Parabolicity induces a violation of causality and thereby leads to instabilities when the fluid velocity approaches the speed of light [33–35]

    STABILITY AND CAUSALITY The first-order corrections of(5) make the equations of motion parabolic. Parabolicity induces a violation of causality and thereby leads to instabilities when the fluid velocity approaches the speed of light [33–35]. One possi- ble solution to this problem is to follow the Müller-Israel- Stewart (MIS) prescription [3, 4] and add n...

  3. [3]

    To close the finite-volume update, the primitive-variable time derivativesSI have to be recovered

    and the staggered constrained transport scheme due to [45, 48]. To close the finite-volume update, the primitive-variable time derivativesSI have to be recovered. The conserved variables depend algebraically and linearly onSI through the first-order contributions given in(5). At fixed prim- itive variables PI and fixed spatial gradients, we may therefore ...

  4. [4]

    An overview of the performed simulations is given in Table I

    NUMERICAL EVOLUTION In this section, we discuss various benchmark problems with increasing complexity. An overview of the performed simulations is given in Table I. 3.1. Correctness and convergence To verify correct implementation, we first consider an analytical benchmark. Since finding analytic solutions for 5 TABLE I. Overview of the performed simulati...

  5. [5]

    Increasing energy- and momentum diffusion has a strong impact on left-moving fast and rarefaction waves and on the right-moving fast wave

    For small dissipative parameters, the solution closely resembles the known ideal MHD case [e.g.25]. Increasing energy- and momentum diffusion has a strong impact on left-moving fast and rarefaction waves and on the right-moving fast wave. The perpendicular shock atx≃ 0.15is less affected by momentum diffusion, in particular when resistivity dominates (see...

  6. [6]

    Harris sheet

    DISCUSSION We have presented a finite-volume scheme for first-order viscoresistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in which viscous and resistive corrections are incorporated directly into the constitutive equations. The resulting model gives a causal extension of dissipative one-form MHD while retaining the same basic set of hydrodynamic variables. Thi...

  7. [7]

    Jaiswal and V

    A. Jaiswal and V. Roy, Relativistic hydrodynamics in heavy-ion collisions: General aspects and recent devel- opments, Advances in High Energy Physics2016, 1–39 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Hernandez and P

    J. Hernandez and P. Kovtun, Relativistic magnetohy- drodynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 10.1007/jhep05(2017)001 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)001 2017

  9. [9]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermo- dynamics and kinetic theory, Annals of Physics118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  10. [10]

    Müller, Zum Paradoxon der Wärmeleitungstheorie, Z

    I. Müller, Zum Paradoxon der Wärmeleitungstheorie, Z. Phys.198, 329 (1967). 13

    1967

  11. [11]

    Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, Journal of High Energy Physics2019, 10.1007/jhep10(2019)034 (2019)

    P. Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, Journal of High Energy Physics2019, 10.1007/jhep10(2019)034 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)034 2019

  12. [12]

    F. S. Bemfica,M. M. Disconzi,andJ. Noronha,First-order general-relativistic viscous fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021044 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    Armas and F

    J. Armas and F. Camilloni, A stable and causal model of magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(10), 039

  14. [14]

    R. E. Hoult and P. Kovtun, Stable and causal relativistic Navier-Stokes equations, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 10.1007/jhep06(2020)067 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)067 2020

  15. [15]

    density frame

    Another potential resolution to the stability problem in relativistic hydrodynamics was proposed in [72] and con- sists in recasting the fluid equations in an approximate Lorentzian form and in specific choice of hydrodynamic frame - the “density frame”

  16. [16]

    Pandya and F

    A. Pandya and F. Pretorius, Numerical exploration of first-order relativistic hydrodynamics, Physical Review D 104, 10.1103/physrevd.104.023015 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.023015 2021

  17. [17]

    Pandya, E

    A. Pandya, E. R. Most, and F. Pretorius, Conservative finite volume scheme for first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics, Physical Review D105, 123001 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Pandya, E

    A. Pandya, E. R. Most, and F. Pretorius, Causal, sta- ble first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics with ideal gas microphysics, Phys. Rev. D106, 123036 (2022), arXiv:2209.09265 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Bantilan, Y

    H. Bantilan, Y. Bea, and P. Figueras, Evolutions in first-order viscous hydrodynamics, JHEP08, 298, arXiv:2201.13359 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Bea and P

    Y. Bea and P. Figueras, Field redefinitions and evo- lutions in relativistic Navier-Stokes, JHEP11, 110, arXiv:2312.16671 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [21]

    G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Perturbative approaches in relativistickinetictheoryandthe emergence of first-order hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D106, 036010 (2022), arXiv:2205.00078 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Rocha,C.V.P

    G.S. Rocha,C.V.P. deBrito,andG.S. Denicol,Hydrody- namic theories for a system of weakly self-interacting clas- sical ultrarelativistic scalar particles: Microscopic deriva- tions and attractors, Phys. Rev. D108, 036017 (2023), arXiv:2306.07423 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Bhambure, A

    J. Bhambure, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, R. Singh, M. Singh, D. Teaney, and F. Zhou, Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics in the density frame: Numerical tests and comparisons, Phys. Rev. C111, 064910 (2025), arXiv:2412.10303 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Bea,RelativisticNavier-Stokes description ofthe quark- gluon plasma radial flow (2025), arXiv:2503.02931 [hep- ph]

    Y. Bea,RelativisticNavier-Stokes description ofthe quark- gluon plasma radial flow (2025), arXiv:2503.02931 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Fantini and M

    D. Fantini and M. E. Rubio, Constraint evolution in first- order viscous relativistic fluids, Phys. Rev. D112, 063038 (2025), arXiv:2506.06430 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Clarisse, E

    N. Clarisse, E. O. Pinho, T. Patel, F. S. Bemfica, M. Hip- pert, and J. Noronha, Flux-conservative Bemfica-Disconzi- Noronha-Kovtun hydrodynamics andshockregularization, Phys. Rev. D113, 024051 (2026), arXiv:2510.16603 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Palenzuela, L

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, O. Reula, and L. Rezzolla, Be- yond ideal mhd: towards a more realistic modelling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society394, 1727–1740 (2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    A. Dash, M. Shokri, L. Rezzolla, and D. H. Rischke, Charge diffusion in relativistic resistive second-order dissi- pative magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D107, 056003 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Schubring, Dissipative string fluids, Phys

    D. Schubring, Dissipative string fluids, Phys. Rev. D91, 043518 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Grozdanov, D

    S. Grozdanov, D. M. Hofman, and N. Iqbal, Generalized global symmetries and dissipative magnetohydrodynam- ics, Physical Review D95, 10.1103/physrevd.95.096003 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.096003 2017

  31. [31]

    R. Lier, A. Jain, J. Armas, and O. Porth, Resistive rel- ativistic magnetohydrodynamics without ampère’s law, Phys. Rev. D112, 083059 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    A. J. Wright and I. Hawke, A resistive extension for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society491, 5510–5523 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    R. E. Hoult and P. Kovtun, Causality in dissipative rela- tivistic magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics2025, 10.1007/jhep04(2025)009 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2025)009 2025

  34. [34]

    Cattaneo, Sulla conduzione del calore, Atti del Semi- nario Matematico e Fisico dell’Università di Modena3, 3 (1948)

    C. Cattaneo, Sulla conduzione del calore, Atti del Semi- nario Matematico e Fisico dell’Università di Modena3, 3 (1948)

    1948

  35. [35]

    Koide, G

    T. Koide, G. S. Denicol, P. Mota, and T. Kodama, Rel- ativistic dissipative hydrodynamics: A minimal causal theory, Phys. Rev. C75, 034909 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, One-form superfluids & magneto- hydrodynamics, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 41 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, Magnetohydrodynamics as superfluidity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 141603 (2019), arXiv:1808.01939 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    J. P. H. Goedbloed and S. Poedts,Principles of Magneto- hydrodynamics: With Applications to Laboratory and As- trophysical Plasmas(Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  39. [39]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic fluids, Annals of Physics151, 466 (1983)

    1983

  40. [40]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Generic instabilities in first-order dissipative relativistic fluid theories, Phys. Rev. D31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  41. [41]

    Gavassino, Can we make sense of dissipation without causality?, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Can we make sense of dissipation without causality?, Phys. Rev. X12, 041001 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Chandra, C

    M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, F. Foucart, and E. Quataert, An Extended Magnetohydrodynamics Model for Relativis- tic Weakly Collisional Plasmas, Astrophys. J.810, 162 (2015), arXiv:1508.00878 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Cordeiro, E

    I. Cordeiro, E. Speranza, K. Ingles, F. S. Bemfica, and J. Noronha, Causality Bounds on Dissipative General- Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 091401 (2024), arXiv:2312.09970 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Molnár, H

    E. Molnár, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Numerical tests of causal relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal C65, 615–635 (2009)

    2009

  45. [45]

    E. R. Most and J. Noronha, Dissipative magnetohydrody- namics for nonresistive relativistic plasmas: An implicit second-order flux-conservative formulation with stiff re- laxation, Phys. Rev. D104, 103028 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Grozdanov and M

    S. Grozdanov and M. Vrbica, Algebraic structure of the gradient expansion in linearized classical hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D113, 065006 (2026)

    2026

  47. [47]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Thermody- namic stability implies causality, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 010606 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Krotscheck and W

    E. Krotscheck and W. Kundt, Causality criteria, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics60, 171 (1978)

    1978

  49. [49]

    R. E. Hoult and P. Kovtun, Causality and classical dis- 14 persion relations, Phys. Rev. D109, 046018 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom,Linear plane waves in dis- sipative relativistic fluids, Phys. Rev. D35, 3723 (1987)

    1987

  51. [51]

    Porth, H

    O. Porth, H. Olivares, Y. Mizuno, Z. Younsi, L. Rezzolla, M. Moscibrodzka, H. Falcke, and M. Kramer, The black hole accretion code, Computational Astrophysics and Cos- mology4, 1 (2017), arXiv:1611.09720 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Olivares, O

    H. Olivares, O. Porth, J. Davelaar, E. R. Most, C. M. Fromm, Y. Mizuno, Z. Younsi, and L. Rezzolla, Con- strained transport and adaptive mesh refinement in the Black Hole Accretion Code,629, A61 (2019), arXiv:1906.10795 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Tóth, The ∇ ·b = 0constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes, Journal of Computational Physics161, 605 (2000)

    G. Tóth, The ∇ ·b = 0constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes, Journal of Computational Physics161, 605 (2000)

    2000

  54. [54]

    BalsaraandD.S

    D.S. BalsaraandD.S. Spicer,Astaggeredmeshalgorithm using high order godunov fluxes to ensure solenoidal mag- netic fields in magnetohydrodynamic simulations, Journal of Computational Physics149, 270 (1999)

    1999

  55. [55]

    Anninos, P

    P. Anninos, P. C. Fragile, and J. D. Salmonson, Cos- mos++: Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics on unstruc- tured grids with local adaptive refinement,The Astrophys- ical Journal635, 723 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0509254

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Brio and C

    M. Brio and C. C. Wu, An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Computational Physics75, 400 (1988)

    1988

  57. [57]

    Dionysopoulou, D

    K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, C. Palenzuela, L. Rezzolla, and B. Giacomazzo, General-relativistic resistive magne- tohydrodynamics in three dimensions: Formulation and tests, Physical Review D88, 044020 (2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    Chandrasekhar,Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Sta- bility, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, Mine- ola, NY, 1981)

    S. Chandrasekhar,Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Sta- bility, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, Mine- ola, NY, 1981)

    1981

  59. [59]

    Osmanov, A

    Z. Osmanov, A. Mignone, S. Massaglia, G. Bodo, and A. Ferrari, On the linear theory of Kelvin-Helmholtz in- stabilities of relativistic magnetohydrodynamic planar flows, Astronomy ’&’ Astrophysics490, 493–500 (2008)

    2008

  60. [60]

    Ferrari, S

    A. Ferrari, S. Massaglia, and E. Trussoni, Magneto- hydrodynamic Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities in astro- physics – iii. hydrodynamic flows with shear layers, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society198, 1065 (1982), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/198/4/1065/18194444/mnras198-1065.pdf

    1982

  61. [61]

    S. A. Orszag and C. M. Tang,Small-scale structure of two- dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics90, 129 (1979)

    1979

  62. [62]

    Keppens, O

    R. Keppens, O. Porth, K. Galsgaard, J. T. Frederiksen, A. L. Restante, G. Lapenta, and C. Parnell, Resistive magnetohydrodynamic reconnection: Resolving long-term, chaotic dynamics, Physics of Plasmas20, 092109 (2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?, Physical Review Letters99, 172301 (2007)

    2007

  64. [64]

    Heinz and B

    U. Heinz and B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic Description of the Quark-Gluon Plasma (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    M.BleicherandE.Bratkovskaya,TheQuestfortheQuark- Gluon Plasma From the Perspective of Dynamical Mod- els of Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Astronomische Nachrichten346, e70006 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    Baumann,Cosmology(2022)

    D. Baumann,Cosmology(2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    D. A. Uzdensky, Magnetic reconnection in extreme as- trophysical environments, Space Science Reviews160, 45 (2011), arXiv:1101.2472 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    J. F. Mahlmann, A. A. Philippov, V. Mewes, B. Ripperda, E. R. Most, and L. Sironi, Three-dimensional dynamics of strongly twisted magnetar magnetospheres: Kinking flux tubes and global eruptions (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Chatterjee, A

    K. Chatterjee, A. Philippov, A. M. Beloborodov, K. Par- frey, B. Ripperda, and E. R. Most, Relativistic Magne- tohydrodynamic Simulations of Giant Magnetar Bursts (2026)

    2026

  70. [70]

    Brandenburg and K

    A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian, Astrophysical mag- netic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory, Physics Reports 417, 1 (2005), arXiv:0405052 [astro-ph]

    2005

  71. [71]

    L. S. Keeble and F. Pretorius, First-order viscous rela- tivistic hydrodynamics on the two-sphere, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124034 (2025), arXiv:2508.20998 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    H. L. H. Shum,F. Abalos,Y. Bea,M. Bezares,P. Figueras, and C. Palenzuela, Neutron star evolution with the Bemfica-Disconzi-Noronha-Kovtun viscous hydrodynam- ics framework, Phys. Rev. D113, 084029 (2026), arXiv:2509.15303 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    L. S. Keeble and J. Redondo-Yuste, Radial Oscillations of Viscous Stars (2026), arXiv:2603.23622 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Bussières, J

    S. Bussières, J. Redondo-Yuste, J. J. Ortega Gómez, and V. Cardoso, Axial Oscillations of Viscous Neutron Stars (2026), arXiv:2604.13208 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Boyanov, V

    V. Boyanov, V. Cardoso, K. D. Kokkotas, and J. Redondo- Yuste, Dynamical Response of Viscous Objects to Grav- itational Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 151402 (2025), arXiv:2411.16861 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Redondo-Yuste and V

    J. Redondo-Yuste and V. Cardoso, Superradiant amplifi- cation by rotating viscous compact objects, Phys. Rev. D 112, L061501 (2025), arXiv:2506.13850 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Del Zanna, O

    L. Del Zanna, O. Zanotti, N. Bucciantini, and P. Lon- drillo, Echo: a eulerian conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and mag- netodynamics, Astronomy and Astrophysics473, 11–30 (2007)

    2007

  78. [78]

    Armas and A

    J. Armas and A. Jain, Effective field theory for hydro- dynamics without boosts, SciPost Phys.11, 054 (2021), arXiv:2010.15782 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021