pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23801 · v1 · pith:GNV2UYNHnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM· astro-ph.SR

Direct Imaging Discovery of Giant Exoplanet β Pictoris d: A Decade-Long Game of Hide-and-Seek

Ben J. Sutlieff , Markus J. Bonse , Valentin Christiaens , Cl\'emence Fontanive , Elisabeth C. Matthews , Luke T. Parker , Tim D. Pearce , Jayne L. Birkby
show 89 more authors
Beth A. Biller Trent J. Dupuy Emily O. Garvin Leyla Iskandarli Jens Kammerer Yifan Zhou Robert J. De Rosa Aarynn L. Carter Sasha Hinkley Matthew A. Kenworthy William O. Balmer Iain Hammond James Mang Caroline V. Morley Mark J. Neeser Olivier Absil Anthony Boccaletti Mariangela Bonavita Brendan P. Bowler Xueqing Chen Felix A. Dannert Julien H. Girard Markus Kasper Anne-Marie Lagrange Pengyu Liu Gilles Orban de Xivry Michael Poon Sascha P. Quanz Beno\^it Serra Johanna M. Vos Kevin Wagner Jason Wang Bernhard Sch\"olkopf Guido Agapito Alex Agudo Berbel D\'aniel Apai Andrea Baruffolo Martin Black Marco Bonaglia Runa Briguglio Yixian Cao Luca Carbonaro Lee Chapman Giovanni Cresci Yigit Dallilar Richard Davies Matthias Deysenroth Ivan Di Antonio Amico Di Cianno Gianluca Di Rico David Doelman Mauro Dolci Frank Eisenhauer Simone Esposito Debora Ferruzzi Helmut Feuchtgruber Natascha F\"orster-Schreiber Kyle Franson Reinhard Genzel Stefan Gillessen Eileen C. Gonzales Michael Hartl Jean Hayoz Heinrich Huber Christoph Keller Kateryna Kravchenko Jarron Leisenring John Lightfoot David Lunney Dieter Lutz Mike Macintosh Filippo Mannucci Stanimir Metchev Thomas Ott David Pearson Alfio Puglisi Sebastian Rabien Christian Rau Armando Riccardi Bernardo Salasnich Taro Shimizu Frans Snik Eckhard Sturm Genaro Su\'arez Linda Tacconi Xianyu Tan William Taylor Christopher Waring Marco Xompero
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 06:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR
keywords direct imagingexoplanetsbeta Pictorisplanetary atmospheresdebris disksmultiplanet systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

A third giant exoplanet has been directly imaged in the β Pictoris system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the discovery of β Pictoris d using direct imaging from VLT/ERIS, JWST/NIRCam, and VLT/SPHERE over an 11-year period. Astrometric data confirm it is bound to the star, and joint orbit fits with the other two planets give it a semi-major axis of 26 au and near-edge-on inclination. The planet's luminosity and colors match those of 51 Eri b, implying similar temperature and mass around 2.4 Jupiter masses, and its position suggests it helps shape the system's debris disk.

Core claim

We report the direct imaging discovery of a third exoplanet in the β Pictoris system. Joint multi-planet orbit fits yield a semi-major axis of 26.0+2.2−6.1 au and inclination 89.0+0.7−0.6 deg for planet d. From the ATMO hot-start evolutionary models, we estimate an effective temperature of 600+45−60 K and mass of 2.4±0.6 MJup.

What carries the argument

Direct imaging detection combined with multi-epoch astrometry and joint multi-planet orbit fitting to establish bound orbit and parameters.

If this is right

  • Planet d is coplanar with the inner planets and consistent with sculpting the inner edge of the debris disk.
  • The planet is among the lowest-mass exoplanets imaged from the ground.
  • Its red color indicates strong CO2 absorption and metal enhancement compared to free-floating objects.
  • Highlights sensitivity of ground-based mid-infrared imaging for such discoveries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar planets may be detectable around other young stars with current and upcoming telescopes.
  • The atmospheric similarities to 51 Eri b suggest shared formation pathways in the moving group.
  • Longer baseline observations could refine the mass and orbit further.

Load-bearing premise

The detected source is a gravitationally bound member of the β Pictoris system rather than a background contaminant.

What would settle it

Future astrometric measurements showing the source does not follow the predicted orbital motion or lacks common proper motion with the system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23801 by Aarynn L. Carter, Alex Agudo Berbel, Alfio Puglisi, Amico Di Cianno, Andrea Baruffolo, Anne-Marie Lagrange, Anthony Boccaletti, Armando Riccardi, Ben J. Sutlieff, Beno\^it Serra, Bernardo Salasnich, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf, Beth A. Biller, Brendan P. Bowler, Caroline V. Morley, Christian Rau, Christopher Waring, Christoph Keller, Cl\'emence Fontanive, D\'aniel Apai, David Doelman, David Lunney, David Pearson, Debora Ferruzzi, Dieter Lutz, Eckhard Sturm, Eileen C. Gonzales, Elisabeth C. Matthews, Emily O. Garvin, Felix A. Dannert, Filippo Mannucci, Frank Eisenhauer, Frans Snik, Genaro Su\'arez, Gianluca Di Rico, Gilles Orban De Xivry, Giovanni Cresci, Guido Agapito, Heinrich Huber, Helmut Feuchtgruber, Iain Hammond, Ivan Di Antonio, James Mang, Jarron Leisenring, Jason Wang, Jayne L. Birkby, Jean Hayoz, Jens Kammerer, Johanna M. Vos, John Lightfoot, Julien H. Girard, Kateryna Kravchenko, Kevin Wagner, Kyle Franson, Lee Chapman, Leyla Iskandarli, Linda Tacconi, Luca Carbonaro, Luke T. Parker, Marco Bonaglia, Marco Xompero, Mariangela Bonavita, Mark J. Neeser, Markus J. Bonse, Markus Kasper, Martin Black, Matthew A. Kenworthy, Matthias Deysenroth, Mauro Dolci, Michael Hartl, Michael Poon, Mike MacIntosh, Natascha F\"orster-Schreiber, Olivier Absil, Pengyu Liu, Reinhard Genzel, Richard Davies, Robert J. De Rosa, Runa Briguglio, Sascha P. Quanz, Sasha Hinkley, Sebastian Rabien, Simone Esposito, Stanimir Metchev, Stefan Gillessen, Taro Shimizu, Thomas Ott, Tim D. Pearce, Trent J. Dupuy, Valentin Christiaens, William O. Balmer, William Taylor, Xianyu Tan, Xueqing Chen, Yifan Zhou, Yigit Dallilar, Yixian Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gallery of images for the epochs at which β Pic d is detected (source indicated with a white arrow). The JWST/NIRCam images have been processed with a high-pass filter to reduce disk flux. The known planet β Pic b is the bright source in the North-East of the image in epochs 1–3. In epochs 4 and 5, β Pic b is within the inner mask used for data reduction. We note that for the 2014-12-08 epoch (epoch 6), β … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The astrometry of β Pic d relative to its host star at each epoch (circles) compared to its expected position if the candidate was a stationary background source (corre￾sponding crosses). The spiral line indicates the expected mo￾tion of a stationary background source, as calculated using the Gaia DR3 proper motion and parallax of β Pic and pro￾jected backwards in time from the recent VLT/ERIS epoch (2025-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: astrometry of β Pic d (white circles) relative to the host star (white star). We show 150 randomly drawn samples from our posteriors, color-coded by eccentricity from low to high (purple to orange) unless the sample crosses the orbit of β Pic b (light blue). The solid black line indicates the lowest-χ 2 orbit. Middle: the same information de-projected by the corresponding inclination for each orbit. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Color-magnitude diagrams of β Pic d, shown alongside photometry for directly imaged planets in BPMG (blue stars) and around other stars (brown stars), as well as free-floating brown dwarfs in BPMG (blue circles) and the field (pink circles). While young (BPMG) and field-age brown dwarfs have similar colors as a function of magnitude, the planets are markedly fainter at F410M than brown dwarfs with comparab… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dynamical prediction for a planet sculpting the disk inner edge (T. D. Pearce et al. 2022). The predicted planet should lie in the white region to 1σ, in agreement with our adopted parameters for β Pic d. Line 1 shows orbits within 5 Hill radii of the disk, along which the planet would lie, and line 2 is the minimum planet mass to sculpt the disk within the star’s age. Shading around lines denotes 1σ uncer… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: PSF-subtracted images obtained with annular PCA on the original 2014 VLT/SPHERE datacube (left col￾umn) and the cube resulting from the subtraction of our best estimate of β Pic b (right column), shown for 10, 20 and 40 principal components. The residuals shown are the results for the K1 filter. The ticks are spaced by 500 mas intervals. 1-FWHM aperture centred on the first-guess location of β Pic b. This … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Marginalised posterior distributions for our orbital parameters of planets d (grey), c (red), and b (yellow) in the β Pic system. Contour lines and shaded regions in the joint posterior indicate the 1-σ and 2-σ credible regions. The posteriors for planet d include the full posterior distributions from the fits (light grey) along with the posteriors after removal of solutions crossing the orbits of the inne… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the direct imaging discovery of a third exoplanet in the $\beta$ Pictoris system. We detect $\beta$ Pictoris d in non-coronagraphic observations obtained with VLT/ERIS as well as multi-epoch archival datasets from JWST/NIRCam and VLT/SPHERE. Astrometric measurements over an 11-year baseline demonstrate that it is consistent with a gravitationally-bound source with orbital motion. Joint multi-planet orbit fits of all three planets in the system yield a semi-major axis of $26.0^{+2.2}_{-6.1}$ au and inclination $89.0^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ deg for planet d. $\beta$ Pictoris d has a larger orbital semi-major axis than the other known planets in the system, but is coplanar with the inner two planets, and its orbit is consistent with sculpting the inner edge of the debris disk. $\beta$ Pictoris d has a contrast of $\Delta L^{\prime}=12.11\pm0.15$ mag, with colors and luminosity that closely match those of 51 Eri b, another exoplanet in the $\beta$ Pictoris moving group. Its VLT/ERIS and JWST/NIRCam colors are distinct from those of free-floating planetary-mass objects of a similar age and temperature. Its red $F410M-F444W$ color indicates strong CO$_2$ absorption in its atmosphere and suggests significant enhancement in metals compared to free-floating objects. From the ATMO hot-start evolutionary models, we estimate an effective temperature of $600^{+45}_{-60}$ K and mass of $2.4\pm0.6$ $M_{\rm Jup}$, which also closely matches similar estimates for 51 Eri b. $\beta$ Pictoris d is among the lowest-mass exoplanets imaged from the ground. This discovery highlights the deep sensitivity achievable with ground-based imaging in the mid-infrared and the discovery potential of future high-contrast observations with the Extremely Large Telescope.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the direct imaging discovery of a third exoplanet, β Pictoris d, in the β Pictoris system. Detections are presented from VLT/ERIS non-coronagraphic observations plus archival JWST/NIRCam and VLT/SPHERE data spanning an 11-year baseline. Astrometry is stated to be consistent with a bound source; joint three-planet Keplerian orbit fits yield a = 26.0^{+2.2}_{-6.1} au and i = 89.0^{+0.7}_{-0.6} deg. Photometry (ΔL' = 12.11 ± 0.15 mag) and colors are compared to 51 Eri b; ATMO hot-start models give T_eff = 600^{+45}_{-60} K and M = 2.4 ± 0.6 M_Jup. The orbit is noted to be coplanar with the inner planets and consistent with sculpting the debris-disk inner edge.

Significance. If the bound-orbit confirmation is robust, the result would be significant as one of the lowest-mass planets directly imaged from the ground and the third planet in a benchmark system. Strengths include the multi-facility, multi-epoch dataset, joint multi-planet fitting, and atmospheric color analysis that distinguishes the source from free-floating objects. These elements support the discovery claim when the astrometric membership test is quantitatively secure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Astrometry and orbit-fitting section] Astrometry and orbit-fitting section: the manuscript asserts that the 11-year astrometry is 'consistent with a gravitationally-bound source with orbital motion' and that joint fits yield the reported a and i, but provides no explicit quantitative test (χ² comparison, false-alarm probability, or Bayes factor) against the background hypothesis of linear relative proper motion set by the star's known PM. This test is load-bearing for the central discovery claim.
  2. [Photometric and color analysis section] § on photometric and color analysis: while colors are stated to be distinct from free-floating objects and to indicate CO₂ absorption, the manuscript does not quantify the significance of the color difference or provide a direct comparison table of photometry against both bound and unbound templates at the same age and temperature.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and text use asymmetric uncertainties for a and i but symmetric for mass; clarify whether the mass uncertainty is 1σ or derived differently.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the number of epochs and instruments contributing to each astrometric point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We agree that the two major comments identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional quantitative analysis, and we will incorporate these changes in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Astrometry and orbit-fitting section] Astrometry and orbit-fitting section: the manuscript asserts that the 11-year astrometry is 'consistent with a gravitationally-bound source with orbital motion' and that joint fits yield the reported a and i, but provides no explicit quantitative test (χ² comparison, false-alarm probability, or Bayes factor) against the background hypothesis of linear relative proper motion set by the star's known PM. This test is load-bearing for the central discovery claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative test is needed to support the bound-orbit claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct χ² comparison of the observed astrometry against both the joint Keplerian three-planet model and a linear relative proper-motion model (using the known stellar proper motion), together with the associated false-alarm probability. This will be placed in the astrometry and orbit-fitting section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Photometric and color analysis section] § on photometric and color analysis: while colors are stated to be distinct from free-floating objects and to indicate CO₂ absorption, the manuscript does not quantify the significance of the color difference or provide a direct comparison table of photometry against both bound and unbound templates at the same age and temperature.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of a quantitative comparison. The revised version will include a table of photometry for β Pictoris d alongside 51 Eri b and representative free-floating objects of comparable age and effective temperature, plus a statistical measure (e.g., χ² or significance) of the color differences. These additions will appear in the photometric and color analysis section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: observational discovery driven by independent astrometric data

full rationale

This is an observational discovery paper reporting direct imaging detection, 11-year multi-epoch astrometry, and standard joint Keplerian orbit fitting to measured positions of three planets. Orbital parameters, mass, and temperature are outputs of data-driven fits and external ATMO evolutionary models, with no equations or steps that reduce by construction to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation. The binding confirmation rests on consistency with orbital motion versus background, which is a direct comparison to observed positions rather than a tautological derivation. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions in direct imaging and orbit fitting plus the applicability of ATMO hot-start models; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • semi-major axis of planet d
    Fitted value from joint multi-planet orbit fits to astrometric data
  • mass from ATMO models
    Derived by matching observed luminosity and colors to evolutionary model grids
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Astrometric motion over 11 years is consistent with gravitational binding to β Pictoris rather than a background object
    Invoked to establish the source as a planet in the system
  • domain assumption ATMO hot-start evolutionary models accurately predict mass and temperature from observed luminosity and colors for young planets
    Used to convert contrast measurements into physical parameters

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6390 in / 1536 out tokens · 27498 ms · 2026-06-26T06:58:48.202731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Amara, A., & Quanz, S. P. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 948, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21918.x Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whe...

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21918.x 2012

  2. [2]

    O., Otten, G

    Balmer, W. O., Otten, G. P. P. L., & Stolker, T. 2025a, backtracks: a python package to compare relative astrometry with background helical motion: v0.6, v0.6 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14838369

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14838369

  3. [3]

    O., Kammerer, J., Pueyo, L., et al

    Balmer, W. O., Kammerer, J., Pueyo, L., et al. 2025b, AJ, 169, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adb1c6

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb1c6

  4. [4]

    O., Pueyo, L., Messier, A., et al

    Balmer, W. O., Pueyo, L., Messier, A., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1001, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae374a Bardalez Gagliuffi, D. C., Balmer, W. O., Pueyo, L., et al. 2025, ApJL, 988, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade30f

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae374a 2026

  5. [5]

    2015, A&A, 582, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526332

    Baudino, J.-L., B´ ezard, B., Boccaletti, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526332

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526332 2015

  6. [6]

    A., Cushing, M

    Beiler, S. A., Cushing, M. C., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6301

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6301 2024

  7. [7]

    Best, W. M. J., Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., et al. 2025, The UltracoolSheet: Photometry, Astrometry, Spectroscopy, and Multiplicity for 4000+ Ultracool Dwarfs and Imaged Exoplanets, 2.1.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15802304

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.15802304 2025

  8. [8]

    2024, A&A, 683, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348203

    Beust, H., Milli, J., Morbidelli, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348203

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348203 2024

  9. [9]

    2019, A&A, 631, A155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935251

    Beuzit, J.-L., Vigan, A., Mouillet, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935251

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935251 2019

  10. [10]

    J., Angelo, I., et al

    Blunt, S., Wang, J. J., Angelo, I., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 89, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab6663

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab6663 2020

  11. [11]

    2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 6756, doi: 10.21105/joss.06756

    Blunt, S., Wang, J., Hirsch, L., et al. 2024, The Journal of Open Source Software, 9, 6756, doi: 10.21105/joss.06756

    doi:10.21105/joss.06756 2024

  12. [12]

    J., Aboobaker, A

    Bock, J. J., Aboobaker, A. M., Adamo, J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2 2026

  13. [13]

    J., Kenworthy, M

    Bohn, A. J., Kenworthy, M. A., Ginski, C., et al. 2020, ApJL, 898, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba27e

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba27e 2020

  14. [14]

    2013, A&A, 555, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220838

    Bonnefoy, M., Boccaletti, A., Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220838

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220838 2013

  15. [15]

    J., Garvin, E

    Bonse, M. J., Garvin, E. O., Gebhard, T. D., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc93c

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acc93c 2023

  16. [16]

    J., Gebhard, T

    Bonse, M. J., Gebhard, T. D., Dannert, F. A., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 194, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adab79

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adab79 2025

  17. [17]

    N., Augereau, J.-C., & Ormel, C

    Bonsor, A., Raymond, S. N., Augereau, J.-C., & Ormel, C. W. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2380, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu721 Discovery ofβPic d from the ground & space23

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu721 2014

  18. [18]

    2021, The Messenger, 182, 22, doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5218

    Brandl, B., Bettonvil, F., van Boekel, R., et al. 2021, The Messenger, 182, 22, doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5218

    doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5218 2021

  19. [19]

    2021, AJ, 161, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abdc2e

    Michalik, D. 2021, AJ, 161, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abdc2e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abdc2e 2021

  20. [20]

    Brandt, T. D. 2021, ApJS, 254, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c 2021

  21. [21]

    D., Dupuy, T

    Brandt, T. D., Dupuy, T. J., Li, Y., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 186, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac042e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac042e 2021

  22. [22]

    B., Maire, A.-L., Molli` ere, P., et al

    Brown-Sevilla, S. B., Maire, A.-L., Molli` ere, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A98, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244826

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244826 2023

  23. [23]

    A., et al

    Bryden, G., Llop-Sayson, J., Beichman, C. A., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 301, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae43e8

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae43e8 2026

  24. [24]

    J., Krist, J

    Burrows, C. J., Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., & WFPC2 Investigation Definition Team. 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 187, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 32.05

    1995

  25. [25]

    2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Cantalloube, F., Christiaens, V., Cantero, C., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13097, Adaptive Optics Systems IX, ed. K. J. Jackson, D. Schmidt, & E. Vernet, 1309713, doi: 10.1117/12.3020278

    doi:10.1117/12.3020278 2024

  26. [26]

    L., Hinkley, S., Kammerer, J., et al

    Carter, A. L., Hinkley, S., Kammerer, J., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd93e

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd93e 2023

  27. [27]

    2018, ApJ, 854, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaac7d

    Charnay, B., B´ ezard, B., Baudino, J.-L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaac7d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaac7d 2018

  28. [28]

    2012, A&A, 542, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118346

    Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Beust, H., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118346

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118346 2012

  29. [29]

    C., Samland, M., Brems, S

    Cheetham, A. C., Samland, M., Brems, S. S., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834112

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834112 2019

  30. [30]

    J., et al

    Chilcote, J., Pueyo, L., De Rosa, R. J., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 182, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa63e9

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa63e9 2017

  31. [31]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 5819

    Christiaens, V., Casassus, S., Absil, O., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 5819

    2019

  32. [32]

    L., McElroy, D

    Christiansen, J. L., McElroy, D. L., Harbut, M., et al. 2025, PSJ, 6, 186, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ade3c2

    doi:10.3847/psj/ade3c2 2025

  33. [33]

    U., Turatto, M., Gratton, R

    Claudi, R. U., Turatto, M., Gratton, R. G., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 70143E

    2008

  34. [34]

    M., van Capelleveen, R

    Close, L. M., van Capelleveen, R. F., Weible, G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5 2025

  35. [35]

    A., Carter, A

    Crotts, K. A., Carter, A. L., Lawson, K., et al. 2025, ApJL, 987, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade798

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade798 2025

  36. [36]

    2023a, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Currie, T., Biller, B., Lagrange, A., et al. 2023a, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 799, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.05696

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05696

  37. [37]

    J., Plavchan, P., et al

    Currie, T., Lada, C. J., Plavchan, P., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/1

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/1 2009

  38. [38]

    2011, ApJL, 736, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L33

    Currie, T., Thalmann, C., Matsumura, S., et al. 2011, ApJL, 736, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L33

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/l33 2011

  39. [39]

    2013, ApJ, 776, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/15

    Currie, T., Burrows, A., Madhusudhan, N., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/15

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/15 2013

  40. [40]

    M., Brandt, T

    Currie, T., Brandt, G. M., Brandt, T. D., et al. 2023b, Science, 380, 198, doi: 10.1126/science.abo6192

    doi:10.1126/science.abo6192

  41. [41]

    2023, A&A, 674, A207, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346559 De Rosa, R

    Davies, R., Absil, O., Agapito, G., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A207, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346559 De Rosa, R. J., Nielsen, E. L., Wahhaj, Z., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345877

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346559 2023

  42. [42]

    2026, A&A, 707, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202658862

    Denis, A., Vigan, A., Chauvin, G., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202658862

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202658862 2026

  43. [43]

    Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., Roberge, A., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1490, doi: 10.1126/science.1248726

    doi:10.1126/science.1248726 2014

  44. [44]

    S., Snik, F., Por, E

    Doelman, D. S., Snik, F., Por, E. H., et al. 2021, ApOpt, 60, D52, doi: 10.1364/AO.422155

    doi:10.1364/ao.422155 2021

  45. [45]

    2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Dohlen, K., Langlois, M., Saisse, M., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali, 70143L, doi: 10.1117/12.789786

    doi:10.1117/12.789786 2008

  46. [46]

    J., Brandt, G

    Dupuy, T. J., Brandt, G. M., & Brandt, T. D. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4411, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3148

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3148 2022

  47. [47]

    J., Liu, M

    Dupuy, T. J., Liu, M. C., Evans, E. L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1688, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3557

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3557 2023

  48. [48]

    H., Boss, A

    Durisen, R. H., Boss, A. P., Mayer, L., et al. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603179

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603179 2007

  49. [49]

    2014, A&A, 563, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322469

    Faramaz, V., Beust, H., Th´ ebault, P., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322469

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322469 2014

  50. [50]

    M., & Vidal-Madjar, A

    Ferlet, R., Hobbs, L. M., & Vidal-Madjar, A. 1987, A&A, 185, 267

    1987

  51. [51]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  52. [52]

    P., Zhou, Y., et al

    Franson, K., Bowler, B. P., Zhou, Y., et al. 2023, ApJL, 950, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd6f6

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd6f6 2023

  53. [53]

    O., Bowler, B

    Franson, K., Balmer, W. O., Bowler, B. P., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad736a Gagn´ e, J., Mamajek, E. E., Malo, L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09 Gagn´ e, J., Faherty, J. K., Ruiz Diaz, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.22012, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.22012 24B. J. Sutlieff & M. J. Bonse et al....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad736a 2024

  54. [54]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al. 2006, SSRv, 123, 485, doi: 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7

    doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 2006

  55. [55]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5 2023

  56. [56]

    D., Bonse, M

    Gebhard, T. D., Bonse, M. J., Quanz, S. P., & Sch¨ olkopf, B. 2022, A&A, 666, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142529

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142529 2022

  57. [57]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33 2019

  58. [58]

    H., Leisenring, J., Kammerer, J., et al

    Girard, J. H., Leisenring, J., Kammerer, J., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12180, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. L. E. Coyle, S. Matsuura, & M. D. Perrin, 121803Q, doi: 10.1117/12.2629636

    doi:10.1117/12.2629636 2022

  59. [59]

    Girard, J. H. V., O’Neal, J., Mawet, D., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8447, Adaptive Optics Systems III, ed. B. L. Ellerbroek, E. Marchetti, & J.-P. V´ eran, 84470L, doi: 10.1117/12.925660

    doi:10.1117/12.925660 2012

  60. [60]

    A., Ardila, D

    Golimowski, D. A., Ardila, D. R., Krist, J. E., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 3109, doi: 10.1086/503801 Gomez Gonzalez, C. A., Wertz, O., Absil, O., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 7 GRAVITY Collaboration, Nowak, M., Lacour, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A110, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936898

    doi:10.1086/503801 2006

  61. [61]

    Y., Bohn, A

    Haffert, S. Y., Bohn, A. J., de Boer, J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5

    doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0780-5 2019

  62. [62]

    C., & Dent, W

    Han, Y., Wyatt, M. C., & Dent, W. R. F. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 3257, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3769

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3769 2023

  63. [63]

    2026, A&A, 705, A196, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556450

    Han, Y., Mansell, E., Jennings, J., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A196, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556450

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556450 2026

  64. [64]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  65. [65]

    R., Lindler, D

    Heap, S. R., Lindler, D. J., Lanz, T. M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 435, doi: 10.1086/309188

    doi:10.1086/309188 2000

  66. [66]

    2023, A&A, 671, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244727 Houll´ e, M., Millour, F., Berio, P., et al

    Hinkley, S., Lacour, S., Marleau, G.-D., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244727 Houll´ e, M., Millour, F., Berio, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A182, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453323

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244727 2023

  67. [67]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  68. [68]

    A., & Mandel, E

    Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E

    2003

  69. [69]

    L., et al

    Kammerer, J., Girard, J., Carter, A. L., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12180, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. L. E. Coyle, S. Matsuura, & M. D. Perrin, 121803N, doi: 10.1117/12.2628865

    doi:10.1117/12.2628865 2022

  70. [70]

    D., et al

    Kammerer, J., Lawson, K., Perrin, M. D., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4ffe

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad4ffe 2024

  71. [71]

    O., Lacour, S., et al

    Kammerer, J., Winterhalder, T. O., Lacour, S., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A318, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556860

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556860 2025

  72. [72]

    2025, A&A, 701, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556170

    Kenworthy, M., Stolker, T., Kammerer, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556170

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556170 2025

  73. [73]

    A., Mellon, S

    Kenworthy, M. A., Mellon, S. N., Bailey, J. I., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040060

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040060 2021

  74. [74]

    A., Dannert, F

    Kenworthy, M. A., Dannert, F. A., Hayoz, J., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558510

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558510 2026

  75. [75]

    2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    Keppler, M., Benisty, M., M¨ uller, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832957

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832957 2018

  76. [76]

    D., Gelino, C

    Kirkpatrick, J. D., Gelino, C. R., Faherty, J. K., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd107

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abd107 2021

  77. [77]

    E., Golimowski, D

    Krist, J. E., Golimowski, D. A., Schroeder, D. J., & Henry, T. J. 1998, PASP, 110, 1046, doi: 10.1086/316221

    doi:10.1086/316221 1998

  78. [78]

    J., Rodet, L., et al

    Lacour, S., Wang, J. J., Rodet, L., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141889

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141889 2021

  79. [79]

    2025, A&A, 694, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452632

    Lacquement, A., Beust, H., Faramaz-Gorka, V., & Duchˆ ene, G. 2025, A&A, 694, A236, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452632

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452632 2025

  80. [80]

    2009, A&A, 493, L21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811325

    Lagrange, A.-M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, L21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811325

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811325 2009

Showing first 80 references.