pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24211 · v1 · pith:V227QTCEnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Jet-ISM Interaction and Multi-channel AGN Feedback in the Post-merger Galaxy 4C+29.30

Xiao Cao , Junfeng Wang , Yan-Mei Chen , Min Bao , Xiaoyu Xu , Chunyi Zhang , Taotao Fang , Jianfeng Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 00:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords AGN feedbackionized gas outflowradio jetpost-merger galaxymulti-channel feedbackradiative windjet-ISM interaction4C+29.30
0
0 comments X

The pith

A post-merger galaxy hosts both a radiatively driven galactic outflow and a misaligned radio jet, showing two AGN feedback channels operating at once.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps ionized gas across 4C+29.30 using optical integral field spectroscopy and radio imaging to separate the effects of radiation and jets from its central black hole. It identifies a biconical outflow on galaxy scales whose axis is offset by 26 degrees from the radio jet, with the outflow showing broad lines and Seyfert ionization while the jet drives localized shocks. This separation establishes that radiative and mechanical feedback can act simultaneously rather than one replacing the other. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies concrete evidence that AGN influence on galaxies can involve multiple independent channels in the same system. The high Eddington ratio of the nucleus supports the radiative driving of the large-scale wind.

Core claim

The central claim is that 4C+29.30 contains a galaxy-scale biconical ionized gas outflow misaligned by about 26 degrees from its radio jet. The outflow is characterized by broad line widths and Seyfert-like ionization ratios and is consistent with a radiatively driven wind from the central supermassive black hole, which is accreting at L_bol/L_Edd greater than or equal to 0.1. In contrast the northern radio lobe produces localized gas acceleration and elevated velocity dispersion through jet-driven shocks. The coexistence of these distinct structures demonstrates that radiative and mechanical AGN feedback channels operate concurrently within the same post-merger galaxy.

What carries the argument

The 26-degree misalignment between the axis of the biconical ionized gas outflow and the radio jet axis, together with the contrasting kinematic signatures and ionization patterns that distinguish the large-scale radiative wind from the localized jet-ISM shocks.

If this is right

  • Radiative feedback can launch galaxy-scale outflows even while mechanical jet feedback operates on smaller scales in the same galaxy.
  • Post-merger systems with rejuvenated nuclei provide laboratories where multiple feedback modes can be observed together.
  • Misaligned structures between outflows and jets can be used to identify independent feedback channels.
  • The Eddington ratio above 0.1 supplies the conditions needed for radiation to drive the observed large-scale wind.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Feedback prescriptions in galaxy evolution models may need to allow simultaneous radiative and mechanical effects rather than assuming one mode at a time.
  • Surveys of other post-merger AGNs could test how common such misalignments are and whether they correlate with merger stage or accretion rate.
  • Multi-wavelength follow-up at higher spatial resolution might reveal whether the misalignment persists on smaller scales closer to the black hole.

Load-bearing premise

That broad line widths plus Seyfert-like ionization reliably mark a radiatively driven wind while localized velocity dispersion increases mark jet-driven shocks, and that the misalignment proves the two are separate channels rather than projection effects or one mechanism.

What would settle it

High-resolution kinematic maps showing the outflow axis aligned with the radio jet within measurement uncertainty, or ionization and velocity data that fail to separate into two physically distinct processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24211 by Chunyi Zhang, Jianfeng Wu, Junfeng Wang, Min Bao, Taotao Fang, Xiao Cao, Xiaoyu Xu, Yan-Mei Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Multi-wavelength observations of 4C+29.30. (a) The g-, r-, and z-band composite image from the DESI Legacy Survey, where the central 45′′×45′′ region is marked by a grey box. (b) The HST image centered at λ = 5852˚A with a bandwidth of 1873˚A. (c) The HST image overlaid with the VLASS 3.0 GHz morphology shown as orange contours and the Chandra 0.5 − 2 keV X-ray emission shown as cyan contours. The VLASS be… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Velocity channel maps of [O iii]λ5007 (top) and Hβ (bottom). For each emission line, the velocity ranges from −1000 km s−1 to 1000 km s−1 , divided into bins of 400 km s−1 . Superimposed black contours highlight regions of enhanced flux in each channel. 2.2.2. Parametric Emission-line Fitting We first perform an initial fit over the spectral cube using a single Gaussian component for each emission line aft… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hα emission-line spectral fitting. The central map is the non-parametric Hα flux derived by DAP. The contour representing ∆BIC = 10 for the Hα+[N ii] wavelength range is marked by a blue dashed curve. The larger black dotted ellipse, centered on the galaxy photometric center (black cross), covers the flux peak (purple cross, Lobe-N) of the northern radio lobe. Its geometric parameters are defined according… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: [O iii] emission-line spectral fitting. The non-parametric [O iii] flux from DAP is presented in the central panel, in which the blue dashed line represents the contour of ∆BIC = 10 for the [O iii]λ5007 line. Panels (a-g) show the [O iii] emission-line spectral fitting results for the selected spaxels marked on the flux map. The configuration of each selected spaxel and the corresponding spectral panel is … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gas-star misalignment. (a) Stellar velocity field from DAP. (b,c) Hα (VHα,C1) and [O iii] (V[OIII],C1) velocity fields of the decomposed Component-1, which combines the single-Gaussian component and the narrower component from double-Gaussian fitting. The solid and dashed lines in each velocity field represent the kinematic position angle (PA) of the stellar and decomposed gaseous components, respectively.… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Kinematics of the decomposed broader gas component. (a) Hα velocity field for the decomposed Component-2 (VHα,C2), corresponding to the broader component identified from double-Gaussian fitting. The VLASS 3.0 GHz radio emission is shown as black contours. Its major axis, oriented at ∼ 26◦ east of north, is marked by a dot-dashed line. The northern radio lobe coincides with a region with enhanced velocities… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Decomposed [O iii] kinematics based on SITELLE observations. (a) The velocity field of the fitted Component-1 derived from the SITELLE spectral cube (SC1). (b) The velocity field of Component-2 derived from fitting the SITELLE data (SC2). In each velocity field, the overlaid magenta hexagon represents the MaNGA bundle; black contours show the VLASS 3.0 GHz emission. The green dotted circle is the same as i… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Emission-line ratio maps. (a) [O iii]/Hβ. (b) [N ii]/Hα. (c) [S ii]/Hα. (d) [O i]/Hα. The logarithms of the line-flux ratios are color-coded according to the color bar. Black contours show the VLASS 3.0 GHz emission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Emission-line ratio diagnostic diagrams. (a) [N ii]/Hα versus [O iii]/Hβ diagram. The dashed and solid curves (G. Kauffmann et al. 2003; L. J. Kewley et al. 2001) represent the demarcation lines separating star-forming (SF), composite (Comp, magenta), and AGN regions. AGN-like spaxels are further divided into Seyfert and LINER by the dotted line (R. Cid Fernandes et al. 2010), where the spaxels are color-c… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Parametric [N ii]/Hα versus [O iii]/Hβ diagnostic diagrams. (a) Ionization classifications for Component-1 (C1), which consists of the single Gaussian component and the narrower component from double-Gaussian fitting. The dashed and solid (G. Kauffmann et al. 2003; L. J. Kewley et al. 2001) curves represent the demarcation lines separating the star-forming (SF, blue), composite (Comp, magenta), and AGN re… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Parametric [S ii]/Hα versus [O iii]/Hβ diagnostic diagrams. (a) Ionization classifications for Component-1 (C1), which consists of the single Gaussian component and the narrower component from double Gaussian fitting. The solid and dashed (L. J. Kewley et al. 2001, 2006) curves represent the demarcation lines separating the star-forming (SF, blue), Seyfert, and LINER (cyan) regions. Seyfert spaxels are co… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Electron temperature determination. (a) Map of the [O iii] emission-line ratio, defined as ([O iii]λ4959+[O iii]λ5007)/[O iii]λ4363, and labeled in the figure as (j4959 + j5007)/j4363. (b) The spatially resolved electron temperature (Te) map derived from the [O iii] emission-line ratios following D. E. Osterbrock & G. J. Ferland (2006). Black contours indicate the VLASS 3.0 GHz radio emission. a transitio… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Mass assembly history. (a-f) Stellar-mass surface density (Σ⋆) maps derived from the MaNGA Pipe3D data for different stellar age ranges, as indicated in the bottom-left insets. The dotted ellipse, centered on the galaxy photometric center (black cross, Center), encompasses the flux peak (magenta cross, Lobe-N) of the northern radio lobe. Its geometric parameters are defined by the optical morphology of th… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Stellar populations and gas-phase properties. (a,b) Mass- and luminosity-weighted stellar metallicities ([Z/H]) derived from the MaNGA Pipe3D data. (c) Spatially resolved Dn4000 map. (d) Spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity derived using the [N ii]/[S ii] line ratio as the indicator. Black contours indicate the VLASS 3.0 GHz radio emission. 8 h40m04 s 03 s 02 s 01 s 29°49'15" 00" 48'45" RA (J2000) DEC… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spatial comparison of the NUV emission, radio jet and Hα morphology. (a) GALEX NUV image. (b) White contours show the VLASS 3.0 GHz radio emission overlaid on the NUV image. (c) Cyan contours show the non-parametric Hα flux from DAP overlaid on the NUV image. The white dot-dashed line in panels (b,c) marks the major axis of the radio jet. sociated with a gas-rich merger, during which the angular momentum … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

4C+29.30 is a post-merger galaxy hosting a rejuvenated active galactic nucleus (AGN) with a complex multi-scale radio morphology, making it an ideal laboratory to study the interplay between different AGN feedback modes. We present a multi-wavelength analysis combining optical integral field spectroscopy (SDSS/MaNGA and CFHT/SITELLE) with radio continuum imaging (VLASS) to map the ionized gas kinematics and ionization structure across the galaxy. We uncover a galaxy-scale, biconical ionized gas outflow whose axis is misaligned by $\sim$26$^\circ$ from the radio jet. This outflow, characterized by broad line widths and Seyfert-like ionization, is mostly consistent with a radiatively driven wind from the central supermassive black hole, which is accreting at a relatively high Eddington ratio ($L_{\mathrm{bol}}/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} \gtrsim 0.1$). In contrast, the northern radio lobe clearly drives localized gas acceleration and increased velocity dispersion, indicative of jet-driven shocks interacting with the interstellar medium, consistent with previous X-ray findings. The coexistence of a radiatively driven galactic-scale outflow and a distinct, misaligned radio jet demonstrates that multiple AGN feedback channels can operate simultaneously within the same system, providing new evidence for the concurrent action of radiative and mechanical feedback.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-wavelength study of the post-merger galaxy 4C+29.30 using MaNGA, SITELLE, and VLASS data. It identifies a galaxy-scale biconical ionized-gas outflow whose axis is misaligned by ~26° from the radio jet; the outflow is characterized by broad lines and Seyfert-like ratios and is interpreted as radiatively driven, while the northern radio lobe is shown to drive localized shocks. The central claim is that these observations demonstrate the simultaneous operation of radiative and mechanical AGN feedback channels in a single system.

Significance. If the separation of feedback channels can be robustly established, the result supplies a concrete observational example of concurrent radiative and mechanical feedback, which is relevant to models of AGN-driven galaxy evolution. The combination of integral-field spectroscopy with radio imaging is a strength, though the paper does not include machine-checked derivations or parameter-free predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the biconical outflow is 'mostly consistent with a radiatively driven wind' while the northern lobe shows 'jet-driven shocks' is load-bearing for the multi-channel conclusion. The separation rests on broad line widths, Seyfert-like ionization ratios, and the 26° misalignment, but the manuscript does not present quantitative comparisons to shock+precursor model grids (e.g., MAPPINGS) or kinematic deprojection to demonstrate that these signatures are unique to radiative driving rather than overlapping with jet-induced shocks.
  2. [Ionization and kinematic diagnostics] Ionization and kinematic diagnostics (throughout): The abstract states that localized velocity dispersion increases indicate jet-ISM shocks while the extended biconical structure indicates radiative driving, yet no error analysis, data tables, or model-fit statistics are referenced to quantify the distinctness of the two components or to exclude projection effects or a single-mechanism interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The Eddington ratio (L_bol/L_Edd ≳ 0.1) is cited from prior X-ray work; a brief recap of the adopted bolometric correction and uncertainty would improve traceability.
  2. [Methods/Observations] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the spatial resolution and seeing of the MaNGA and SITELLE data when discussing the spatial extent of the outflow versus the radio lobe.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript on multi-channel AGN feedback in 4C+29.30. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to clarify the supporting evidence while acknowledging the limitations of the current analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the biconical outflow is 'mostly consistent with a radiatively driven wind' while the northern lobe shows 'jet-driven shocks' is load-bearing for the multi-channel conclusion. The separation rests on broad line widths, Seyfert-like ionization ratios, and the 26° misalignment, but the manuscript does not present quantitative comparisons to shock+precursor model grids (e.g., MAPPINGS) or kinematic deprojection to demonstrate that these signatures are unique to radiative driving rather than overlapping with jet-induced shocks.

    Authors: The primary basis for distinguishing the channels remains the observed spatial separation (galaxy-scale bicone versus localized northern lobe interaction), the 26° misalignment, and the ionization structure. We agree that direct quantitative comparisons to MAPPINGS grids or full kinematic deprojection are not presented. In revision we will add a paragraph in the discussion referencing published shock+precursor grids to show consistency of the extended bicone with photoionization and will explicitly note the absence of deprojection as a limitation. These additions clarify but do not alter the central interpretation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Ionization and kinematic diagnostics] Ionization and kinematic diagnostics (throughout): The abstract states that localized velocity dispersion increases indicate jet-ISM shocks while the extended biconical structure indicates radiative driving, yet no error analysis, data tables, or model-fit statistics are referenced to quantify the distinctness of the two components or to exclude projection effects or a single-mechanism interpretation.

    Authors: Line-fitting uncertainties and basic error propagation are described in the methods; however, we accept that a consolidated table of regional averages and a short discussion of projection effects would improve quantification. We will add a table of mean velocity dispersion, line ratios, and uncertainties for the biconical and northern-lobe regions, together with a brief paragraph addressing possible projection or single-mechanism scenarios. These changes will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct multi-instrument observations

full rationale

The paper is an observational study that maps ionized gas kinematics and ionization structure using independent datasets from MaNGA, SITELLE, and VLASS, combined with prior X-ray results. The central claim of concurrent radiative and mechanical feedback follows from measured line widths, Seyfert-like ratios, velocity dispersion increases, and the reported 26° misalignment; none of these quantities are derived from equations or parameters fitted to the same data and then re-predicted. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally falsifiable via the raw spectra and images.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational paper; central claim rests on established astrophysical diagnostics for outflow driving mechanisms rather than new theoretical constructs or fitted parameters introduced here.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Broad emission-line widths and Seyfert-like ionization ratios indicate a radiatively driven wind from the central black hole.
    Invoked to classify the biconical outflow as radiatively driven (abstract).
  • domain assumption Localized gas acceleration and elevated velocity dispersion at the northern radio lobe indicate jet-driven shocks interacting with the ISM.
    Used to contrast with the radiative outflow and cite prior X-ray findings (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5802 in / 1298 out tokens · 32458 ms · 2026-06-26T00:01:35.983568+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2025, ApJ, 984, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc38d

    Ali, A., Sebastian, B., Kakkad, D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc38d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc38d 2025

  2. [2]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652

    work page doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  3. [3]

    G., Sparks, W

    Allen, M. G., Sparks, W. B., Koekemoer, A., et al. 2002, ApJS, 139, 411, doi: 10.1086/338823

    work page doi:10.1086/338823 2002

  4. [4]

    R., Wuyts, S., F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Avery, C. R., Wuyts, S., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5134, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab780

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab780 2021

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  6. [6]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2892

    Bao, M., Chen, Y.-m., Yuan, Q.-r., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3830, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2892

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2892 2019

  7. [7]

    1991, ApJ, 373, 369, doi: 10.1086/170058 Bˆ ırzan, L., Rafferty, D

    Bertola, F., Bettoni, D., Danziger, J., et al. 1991, ApJ, 373, 369, doi: 10.1086/170058 Bˆ ırzan, L., Rafferty, D. A., McNamara, B. R., Wise, M. W., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2004, ApJ, 607, 800, doi: 10.1086/383519

    work page doi:10.1086/170058 1991

  8. [8]

    , volume = 169, pages =

    Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1974, MNRAS, 169, 395, doi: 10.1093/mnras/169.3.395

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/169.3.395 1974

  9. [9]

    2011, AJ, 142, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/31

    Price-Whelan, A. 2011, AJ, 142, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/31

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/31 2011

  10. [10]

    R., Bershady, M

    Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7567 2017

  11. [11]

    Branduardi-Raymont, G., & Ashton, C. E. 2005, A&A, 431, 111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041775

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041775 2005

  12. [12]

    Overview of the SDSS-IV MaNGA Survey: Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory

    Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 7, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/7

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/7 2015

  13. [13]

    , eprint =

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  14. [14]

    2025, ApJL, 979, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaa7b

    Cao, X., Chen, Y.-M., Shi, Y., et al. 2025, ApJL, 979, L48, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaa7b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaa7b 2025

  15. [15]

    doi:10.1086/381875 , eprint =

    Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/381875 2004

  16. [16]

    K., & Tobin, R

    Chandola, Y., Saikia, D. J., & Gupta, N. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 269, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15854.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15854.x 2010

  17. [17]

    N., Gallagher, S

    Chartas, G., Brandt, W. N., Gallagher, S. C., & Garmire, G. P. 2002, ApJ, 579, 169, doi: 10.1086/342744

    work page doi:10.1086/342744 2002

  18. [18]

    A., et al

    Chen, Y.-M., Shi, Y., Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2016, NatCo, 7, 13269, doi: 10.1038/ncomms13269 Cid Fernandes, R., Stasi´ nska, G., Schlickmann, M. S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1036, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16185.x

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13269 2016

  19. [19]

    A., & Morganti, R

    Riffel, R. A., & Morganti, R. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 5103, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2268

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2268 2020

  20. [20]

    M., Kraemer, S

    Crenshaw, D. M., Kraemer, S. B., & George, I. M. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 117, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082801.100328

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082801.100328 2003

  21. [21]

    2015a, A&A, 582, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526581

    Cresci, G., Marconi, A., Zibetti, S., et al. 2015a, A&A, 582, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526581

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526581

  22. [22]

    2015b, ApJ, 799, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82

    Cresci, G., Mainieri, V., Brusa, M., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 799, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/82

  23. [23]

    2006, ApJ, 647, 1040, doi: 10.1086/505526

    Croft, S., van Breugel, W., de Vries, W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 1040, doi: 10.1086/505526

    work page doi:10.1086/505526 2006

  24. [24]

    , year = 2005, month = apr, volume =

    Croton, D. J., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 11, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x Dall’Agnol de Oliveira, B., Storchi-Bergmann, T.,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x 2006

  25. [25]

    A., & Ramakrishnan, V

    Morganti, R., Riffel, R. A., & Ramakrishnan, V. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1076

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1076 2023

  26. [26]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 22

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  27. [27]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 3930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz627

    Drissen, L., Martin, T., Rousseau-Nepton, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz627

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz627 2019

  28. [28]

    A., et al

    Drory, N., MacDonald, N., Bershady, M. A., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 77, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/77

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/77 2015

  29. [29]

    2016, A&A, 593, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526880

    Drouart, G., Rocca-Volmerange, B., De Breuck, C., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526880

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526880 2016

  30. [30]

    Fabian, A. C. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 455, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 2012

  31. [31]

    , year = 1974, month = may, volume =

    Fanaroff, B. L., & Riley, J. M. 1974, MNRAS, 167, 31P, doi: 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/167.1.31p 1974

  32. [32]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 1344, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22008.x

    Gaibler, V., Khochfar, S., Krause, M., & Silk, J. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 438, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x 2012

  33. [33]

    2020, NatAs, 4, 10, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1

    Gaspari, M., Tombesi, F., & Cappi, M. 2020, NatAs, 4, 10, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 2020

  34. [34]

    M., Mainieri, V., et al

    Girdhar, A., Harrison, C. M., Mainieri, V., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9322, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3453

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3453 2024

  35. [35]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Baril, M. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 84460U, doi: 10.1117/12.926782

    work page doi:10.1117/12.926782 2012

  36. [36]

    E., Siegmund, W

    Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332, doi: 10.1086/500975

    work page doi:10.1086/500975 2006

  37. [37]

    J., Croston, J

    Hardcastle, M. J., Croston, J. H., & Kraft, R. P. 2007, ApJ, 669, 893, doi: 10.1086/521696

    work page doi:10.1086/521696 2007

  38. [38]

    Solving the cooling flow problem with combined jet-wind AGN feedback

    He, A., Guo, M., Yuan, F., et al. 2025, arXiv, arXiv:2511.02796, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.02796

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.02796 2025

  39. [39]

    The Co-Evolution of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes: Insights from Surveys of the Contemporary Universe

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 589, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 2014

  40. [40]

    J., & Symington, N

    Holt, J., Tadhunter, C., Morganti, R., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1633, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10604.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10604.x 2006

  41. [41]

    Hubble, E. P. 1926, ApJ, 64, 321, doi: 10.1086/143018

    work page doi:10.1086/143018 1926

  42. [42]

    N., Jahnke, K., et al

    Husemann, B., Bennert, V. N., Jahnke, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24bc 2019

  43. [43]

    2007, MNRAS, 376, 1145, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11495.x

    Jamrozy, M., Konar, C., Saikia, D. J., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 581, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11782.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11782.x 2007

  44. [44]

    E., Harrison, C

    Jarvis, M. E., Harrison, C. M., Thomson, A. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2710, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz556

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz556 2019

  45. [45]

    Joseph, P., George, K., & Paul, K. T. 2022a, A&A, 667, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243923

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243923

  46. [46]

    S., et al

    Joseph, P., Sreekumar, P., Stalin, C. S., et al. 2022b, MNRAS, 516, 2300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2388

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2388

  47. [47]

    D., Banfield, J., et al

    Juneau, S., Goulding, A. D., Banfield, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac425f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac425f 2022

  48. [48]

    V., & Jenkins, A

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  49. [49]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  50. [50]

    J., & Symington, N

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 Krajnovi´ c, D., Cappellari, M., de Zeeuw, P. T., & Copin, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 787, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09902.x Kr´ ol, D. L., Fabbiano, G., Elvis, M., et al. 2025, arXiv, arXiv:2510.22447, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.22447

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  52. [52]

    Jansky Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS)

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb 2020

  53. [53]

    Formation of precessing jets by tilted black hole discs in 3D general relativistic MHD simulations[J/OL]

    Liska, M., Hesp, C., Tchekhovskoy, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, L81, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx174

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx174 2018

  54. [54]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 983, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa099

    Liska, M., Hesp, C., Tchekhovskoy, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 983, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa099

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa099 2021

  55. [55]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 550, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz834

    Liska, M., Tchekhovskoy, A., Ingram, A., & van der Klis, M. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 550, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz834

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz834 2019

  56. [56]

    Liuzzo, E., Giovannini, G., Giroletti, M., & Taylor, G. B. 2009, A&A, 505, 509, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912586

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912586 2009

  57. [57]

    K., Oonk, J

    Mahony, E. K., Oonk, J. B. R., Morganti, R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2453, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2456

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2456 2016

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Gallerani, S., Neri, R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, L66, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x 2012

  59. [59]

    R., Fabian, A

    Maiolino, R., Russell, H. R., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2017, Natur, 544, 202, doi: 10.1038/nature21677

    work page doi:10.1038/nature21677 2017

  60. [60]

    2025, NatAs, 9, 907, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02518-6

    Marconcini, C., Marconi, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2025, NatAs, 9, 907, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02518-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02518-6 2025

  61. [61]

    The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/426387 2005

  62. [62]

    2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Martin, T., Drissen, L., & Joncas, G. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 495, Astronomical Data Analysis Software an Systems XXIV (ADASS XXIV), ed. A. R. Taylor & E. Rosolowsky, 327

    2015

  63. [63]

    J., Carretti, E., et al

    McKinley, B., Tingay, S. J., Carretti, E., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4056, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2890

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2890 2018

  64. [64]

    R., Nulsen P

    McNamara, B. R., & Nulsen, P. E. J. 2012, NJPh, 14, 055023, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023 2012

  65. [65]

    G., & Roeser, H.-J

    Meisenheimer, K., Yates, M. G., & Roeser, H.-J. 1997, A&A, 325, 57

    1997

  66. [66]

    V., & Wagner, A

    Mukherjee, D., Bicknell, G. V., & Wagner, A. Y. 2021, AN, 342, 1140, doi: 10.1002/asna.20210061

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20210061 2021

  67. [67]

    R., Alexander, D

    Mullaney, J. R., Alexander, D. M., Fine, S., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt751

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt751 2013

  68. [68]

    2010, ApJ, 711, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/144 23 Oca˜ na Flaquer, B., Leon, S., Combes, F., & Lim, J

    Noguchi, K., Terashima, Y., Ishino, Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/144 23 Oca˜ na Flaquer, B., Leon, S., Combes, F., & Lim, J. 2010, A&A, 518, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913392

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/711/1/144 2010

  69. [69]

    A., & Morganti, R

    Oosterloo, T. A., & Morganti, R. 2005, A&A, 429, 469, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041379

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041379 2005

  70. [70]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  71. [71]

    Pentericci, L., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., et al. 1999, A&A, 341, 329, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9809056

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9809056 1999

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Pounds, K. A., Reeves, J. N., King, A. R., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 705, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.07006.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.07006.x 2003

  73. [73]

    N., O’Brien, P

    Reeves, J. N., O’Brien, P. T., & Ward, M. J. 2003, ApJL, 593, L65, doi: 10.1086/378218 Reichardt Chu, B., Fisher, D. B., Nielsen, N. M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 5782, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac420

    work page doi:10.1086/378218 2003

  74. [74]

    E., Greene, J

    Reines, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Geha, M. 2013, ApJ, 775, 116, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/116

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/2/116 2013

  75. [75]

    2024, Galax, 12, 15, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12020015 Salom´ e, Q., Salom´ e, P., & Combes, F

    Rubinur, K. 2024, Galax, 12, 15, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12020015 Salom´ e, Q., Salom´ e, P., & Combes, F. 2015, A&A, 574, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424932 S´ anchez, S. F., Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., Lacerda, E., et al. 2022, ApJS, 262, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b8f

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies12020015 2024

  76. [76]

    C., et al

    Siemiginowska, A., Stawarz, L., Cheung, C. C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/124

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/124 2012

  77. [77]

    The multi-object, fiber-fed spectrographs for SDSS and the baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey,

    Smee, S. A., Gunn, J. E., Uomoto, A., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 32, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32 2013

  78. [78]

    A., Siemiginowska, A., Migliori, G., et al

    Sobolewska, M. A., Siemiginowska, A., Migliori, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 758, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/90

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/90 2012

  79. [79]

    Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework

    Somerville, R. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 51, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 2015

  80. [80]

    M., Harrison, C

    Swinbank, A. M., Harrison, C. M., Tiley, A. L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 381, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1275

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1275 2019

Showing first 80 references.