pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27823 · v1 · pith:CPJHST5Enew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · nucl-th· physics.atm-clus

Universality in strongly interacting bosonic clusters

L. Madeira , F. Pederiva , U. van Kolck This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas nucl-thphysics.atm-clus
keywords effective field theorybosonic clustershelium-4universalityzero-range interactionsground-state energiescutoff independencefew-body systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

An effective field theory fixes two- and three-body interactions solely by dimer and trimer energies, producing cutoff-independent cluster energies up to fifteen particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an effective field theory for strongly interacting bosons with large scattering length, using helium-4 clusters as the example. At leading order the two- and three-body zero-range forces are fixed completely by the ground-state energies of the dimer and trimer. With these forces the ground-state energies of clusters from two to fifteen particles approach limits that no longer depend on the cutoff, and the coefficients needed to reach those limits stay of natural size. At next-to-leading order the addition of range corrections and a four-body force calibrated to the tetramer reduces cutoff sensitivity and improves agreement with calculations that use a realistic potential.

Core claim

At leading order the two- and three-body zero-range interactions are fixed completely by the dimer and trimer ground-state energies. With these interactions the ground-state energies of clusters containing up to fifteen particles approach cutoff-independent limits whose extrapolation coefficients remain of natural size. At next-to-leading order the inclusion of two-body range corrections together with a four-body force calibrated to the tetramer ground-state energy reduces the residual cutoff dependence and brings the results into closer agreement with calculations that employ a realistic potential.

What carries the argument

Leading-order zero-range two- and three-body contact interactions fixed by the dimer and trimer binding energies.

If this is right

  • Ground-state energies for clusters up to N=15 approach cutoff-independent limits.
  • The extrapolation coefficients needed to reach those limits have natural size.
  • Next-to-leading-order range corrections and a four-body force reduce cutoff sensitivity.
  • Results at both orders agree closely with those obtained from a realistic potential.
  • The same effective theory applies directly to larger clusters and to bulk helium.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend without new parameters to other bosonic systems that share a large scattering length.
  • Higher-order terms could eventually connect few-body cluster properties to macroscopic helium observables.
  • Precise experimental values for the tetramer energy would tighten the next-to-leading-order calibration.

Load-bearing premise

That two- and three-body zero-range forces fixed only by dimer and trimer energies are sufficient to describe larger clusters without needing additional short-distance physics or higher-body forces.

What would settle it

A calculation for sixteen or more particles that shows energies failing to approach a cutoff-independent limit or requiring extrapolation coefficients much larger than natural size would falsify the leading-order result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27823 by F. Pederiva, L. Madeira, U. van Kolck.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic interatomic potential used to generate reference data. (b) EFT calibration and prediction: at LO the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dependence on the cutoff [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows that the LO extrapolation converges −20 −15 −10 −5 0 E N (∞) [K] (a) LO, n = 1 LO, n = 2 LO, n = 3 LO, n = 4 NLO, n = 1 HFDHE2 −0.10 −0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 (E N (∞) − EN,ref )/EN,ref (b) LO NLO 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 N 10 20 30 3E N (∞)/NE3 (c) LO NLO HFDHE2 Unitarity (Carlson2017) FIG. 3. Dependence on the number N of atoms in the clus￾ter. (a) Extrapolated energies EN (∞) (in K) for LO wit… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop an effective field theory (EFT) for strongly interacting bosonic clusters, using $^4$He as a paradigmatic example of universality in systems with large scattering length. At leading order (LO), two- and three-body zero-range interactions are entirely determined by the dimer and trimer ground-state energies. We show that ground-state energies for up to $N=15$ particles converge to cutoff-independent limits with extrapolation coefficients of natural size. At next-to-leading order (NLO), corrections stemming from the two-body interaction range and a four-body force, calibrated to the tetramer ground-state energy, reduce cutoff sensitivity. Close agreement with results from a realistic potential is found at LO and improved at NLO, demonstrating systematic convergence with few parameters at each order. The resulting EFT is directly applicable to larger clusters and bulk helium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a zero-range effective field theory (EFT) for bosonic clusters with large scattering length, taking 4He as example. At leading order the two- and three-body contacts are fixed exclusively by the dimer and trimer ground-state energies; the authors report that the resulting N-body ground-state energies for N ≤ 15 converge to cutoff-independent limits whose extrapolation coefficients are of natural size. At NLO, finite-range corrections to the two-body interaction together with a four-body force (calibrated to the tetramer energy) are added, further reducing cutoff dependence and yielding closer agreement with calculations that employ realistic potentials. The EFT is presented as directly extensible to larger clusters and to bulk helium.

Significance. If the reported numerical convergence holds under the stated regulators and cutoff windows, the work supplies concrete evidence that three-body forces alone suffice to absorb short-distance sensitivity up to N=15 at LO, thereby furnishing a predictive, few-parameter framework for universal bosonic few-body physics. The explicit demonstration of natural-size extrapolation coefficients and systematic improvement from LO to NLO constitutes a strength of the manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4] The central claim that LO results for N>3 are cutoff-independent rests on the numerical observation that three-body contact (fixed by trimer energy) removes all regulator dependence. Section 4 (or equivalent) should state the range of cutoffs explored, the functional form of the regulator, and the precise extrapolation procedure used to extract the infinite-cutoff limit; without these details the size of residual cutoff artifacts cannot be assessed quantitatively.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2 (or equivalent) lists N-body energies at several cutoffs; the reported extrapolation coefficients are stated to be natural, yet no uncertainty from the fit or from variation of the cutoff window is provided. This information is required to judge whether the convergence is robust or could be an artifact of the chosen cutoff interval.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states convergence but does not quote any numerical values or error estimates; a brief parenthetical mention of the largest N and the size of the extrapolation coefficients would improve readability.
  2. [Section 2] Notation for the LO and NLO Lagrangians is introduced without an explicit equation number; cross-referencing would aid readers who wish to reproduce the power counting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the positive recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 4] The central claim that LO results for N>3 are cutoff-independent rests on the numerical observation that three-body contact (fixed by trimer energy) removes all regulator dependence. Section 4 (or equivalent) should state the range of cutoffs explored, the functional form of the regulator, and the precise extrapolation procedure used to extract the infinite-cutoff limit; without these details the size of residual cutoff artifacts cannot be assessed quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of these technical details will allow readers to assess residual cutoff dependence more quantitatively. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to specify the cutoff range explored, the precise functional form of the regulator employed, and the functional form and fitting procedure used for the infinite-cutoff extrapolation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2] Table 2 (or equivalent) lists N-body energies at several cutoffs; the reported extrapolation coefficients are stated to be natural, yet no uncertainty from the fit or from variation of the cutoff window is provided. This information is required to judge whether the convergence is robust or could be an artifact of the chosen cutoff interval.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative uncertainties on the extrapolation coefficients and an assessment of stability under changes to the cutoff window would strengthen the presentation. In the revised version we will supply fit uncertainties and discuss the sensitivity to the chosen cutoff interval, either in the text or via an augmented table. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in EFT parameter fixing and numerical convergence

full rationale

The paper fixes LO two- and three-body zero-range interactions explicitly to the dimer and trimer ground-state energies (standard EFT input) and then numerically computes and extrapolates ground-state energies for N up to 15, reporting cutoff independence as an observed outcome with natural-size coefficients. This does not reduce any central claim to a self-definition or fitted input renamed as prediction by construction; the higher-N results are independent calculations within the regulated theory. NLO includes an explicit four-body force calibrated to the tetramer, stated separately. No load-bearing self-citation, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling appears in the derivation chain. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks via comparison to realistic potentials.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities listed. The approach relies on standard EFT power counting and zero-range approximations whose details are not provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1137 out tokens · 39290 ms · 2026-06-29T02:33:55.286210+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length,

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, “Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length,” Phys. Rept. 428(2006) 259

    2006

  2. [2]

    EfimovPhysics: areview,

    P.NaidonandS.Endo, “EfimovPhysics: areview,” Rept. Prog. Phys.80(2017) 056001

    2017

  3. [3]

    Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases,

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne and E. Tiesinga, “Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82 (2010) 1225

    2010

  4. [4]

    Nuclear ef- fective field theory: status and perspectives,

    H.-W. Hammer, S. König and U. van Kolck, “Nuclear ef- fective field theory: status and perspectives,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92(2020) 025004

    2020

  5. [5]

    Efimov Physics and Connections to Nuclear Physics,

    A. Kievsky, L. Girlanda, M. Gattobigio and M. Viviani, “Efimov Physics and Connections to Nuclear Physics,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 465

    2021

  6. [6]

    An accurate intermolecular potential for helium,

    R. A. Aziz, V. P. S. Nain, J. S. Carley, W. L. Taylor and G. T. McConville, “An accurate intermolecular potential for helium,” J. Chem. Phys.70(1979) 4330

    1979

  7. [7]

    An examination of ab initio results for the helium potential energy curve,

    R. A. Aziz and M. J. Slaman, “An examination of ab initio results for the helium potential energy curve,” J. Chem. Phys.94(1991) 8047

    1991

  8. [8]

    Modern He–He potentials: Anotherlookatbindingenergy, effectiverangetheory, re- tardation, andEfimovstates,

    A. R. Janzen and R. A. Aziz, “Modern He–He potentials: Anotherlookatbindingenergy, effectiverangetheory, re- tardation, andEfimovstates,” J.Chem.Phys.103(1995) 9626

    1995

  9. [9]

    An accurate potential energy curve for helium based on ab initio calculations,

    A. R. Janzen and R. A. Aziz, “An accurate potential energy curve for helium based on ab initio calculations,” J. Chem. Phys.107(1997) 914

    1997

  10. [10]

    Helium dimer potential from symmetry- adapted perturbation theory calculations using large gaussian geminal and orbital basis sets,

    T. Korona, H. L. Williams, R. Bukowski, B. Jeziorski and K. Szalewicz, “Helium dimer potential from symmetry- adapted perturbation theory calculations using large gaussian geminal and orbital basis sets,” J. Chem. Phys. 106(1997) 5109

    1997

  11. [11]

    Relativistic and Quan- tum Electrodynamics Effects in the Helium Pair Poten- tial,

    M. Przybytek, W. Cencek, J. Komasa, G. Lach, B. Jeziorski and K. Szalewicz, “Relativistic and Quan- tum Electrodynamics Effects in the Helium Pair Poten- tial,” Phys.Rev.Lett.104(2010)183003[erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 129902]

    2010

  12. [12]

    Calculations of Ground-State Properties of Liquid4He Droplets,

    V. R. Pandharipande, J. G. Zabolitzky, S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa and U. Helmbrecht, “Calculations of Ground-State Properties of Liquid4He Droplets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1676

    1983

  13. [13]

    The helium trimer with soft-core potentials,

    A. Kievsky, E. Garrido, C. Romero-Redondo and P. Bar- letta, “The helium trimer with soft-core potentials,” Few Body Syst.51(2011) 259

    2011

  14. [14]

    Variational calculation of 4He tetramer ground and excited states using a realistic pair potential,

    E. Hiyama and M. Kamimura, “Variational calculation of 4He tetramer ground and excited states using a realistic pair potential,” Phys. Rev. A85(2012) 022502

    2012

  15. [15]

    Linear correlations be- tween 4He trimer and tetramer energies calculated with various realistic4He potentials,

    E. Hiyama and M. Kamimura, “Linear correlations be- tween 4He trimer and tetramer energies calculated with various realistic4He potentials,” Phys. Rev. A85(2012) 062505

    2012

  16. [16]

    Universality in Efimov- associated tetramers in 4He,

    E. Hiyama and M. Kamimura, “Universality in Efimov- associated tetramers in 4He,” Phys. Rev. A90(2014) 052514

    2014

  17. [17]

    N- boson spectrum from a Discrete Scale Invariance,

    A. Kievsky, N. K. Timofeyuk and M. Gattobigio, “N- boson spectrum from a Discrete Scale Invariance,” Phys. Rev. A90(2014) 032504

    2014

  18. [18]

    Few bosons to many bosons inside the unitary window: A transition between universal and nonuniversal behavior,

    A. Kievsky, A. Polls, B. Juliá-Díaz, N. K. Timofeyuk and M. Gattobigio, “Few bosons to many bosons inside the unitary window: A transition between universal and nonuniversal behavior,” Phys. Rev. A102(2020) 063320

    2020

  19. [19]

    Structural properties of4HeN (N=2–10) clusters for different potential models at the physical point and at unitarity,

    A. J. Yates and D. Blume, “Structural properties of4HeN (N=2–10) clusters for different potential models at the physical point and at unitarity,” Phys. Rev. A105(2022) 022824

    2022

  20. [20]

    Subleading contributions to N-boson systems inside the universal window,

    P. Recchia, A. Kievsky, L. Girlanda and M. Gattobigio, “Subleading contributions to N-boson systems inside the universal window,” Phys. Rev. A106(2022) 022812

    2022

  21. [21]

    Modern potentials and the properties of condensed He-4,

    M. H. Kalos, M. A. Lee, P. A. Whitlock and G. V. Chester, “Modern potentials and the properties of condensed He-4,” Phys. Rev. B24(1981) 115. 6

    1981

  22. [22]

    Path integrals in the theory of con- densed helium,

    D. M. Ceperley, “Path integrals in the theory of con- densed helium,” Rev. Mod. Phys.67(1995) 279

    1995

  23. [23]

    Equation of state of solid3He,

    S. Moroni, F. Pederiva, S. Fantoni and M. Boninsegni, “Equation of state of solid3He,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 2650

    2000

  24. [24]

    Energy levels arising from the resonant two- body forces in a three-body system,

    V. Efimov, “Energy levels arising from the resonant two- body forces in a three-body system,” Phys. Lett. B33 (1970) 563

    1970

  25. [25]

    Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly- interacting particles,

    V. N. Efimov, “Weakly-bound states of 3 resonantly- interacting particles,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.12(1971) 589

    1971

  26. [26]

    Observation of the Efimov state of the helium trimer,

    M. Kunitski, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Schöffler, A. Czasch, W. Schöl- lkopf, R. E. Grisenti and T. Jahnke,et al., “Observation of the Efimov state of the helium trimer,” Science348 (2015) 551

    2015

  27. [27]

    Effective field theory for few-nucleon systems,

    P. F. Bedaque and U. van Kolck, “Effective field theory for few-nucleon systems,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.52 (2002) 339

    2002

  28. [28]

    Renor- malization of the three-body system with short-range in- teractions,

    P.F.Bedaque, H.-W.HammerandU.vanKolck, “Renor- malization of the three-body system with short-range in- teractions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 463

    1999

  29. [29]

    The three-boson system with short-range interactions,

    P. F. Bedaque, H.-W. Hammer and U. van Kolck, “The three-boson system with short-range interactions,” Nucl. Phys. A646(1999) 444

    1999

  30. [30]

    Four-Body Scale in Uni- versal Few-Boson Systems,

    B. Bazak, J. Kirscher, S. König, M. Pavón Valderrama, N. Barnea and U. van Kolck, “Four-Body Scale in Uni- versal Few-Boson Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 143001

    2019

  31. [31]

    Effective field theory of short-range forces,

    U. van Kolck, “Effective field theory of short-range forces,” Nucl. Phys. A645(1999) 273

    1999

  32. [32]

    Univer- sal equation for Efimov states,

    E. Braaten, H.-W. Hammer and M. Kusunoki, “Univer- sal equation for Efimov states,” Phys. Rev. A67(2003) 022505

    2003

  33. [33]

    Universality in the three-body problem for He-4 atoms,

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, “Universality in the three-body problem for He-4 atoms,” Phys. Rev. A67 (2003) 042706

    2003

  34. [34]

    The four- boson system with short-range interactions,

    L. Platter, H.-W. Hammer and U.-G. Meißner, “The four- boson system with short-range interactions,” Phys. Rev. A70(2004) 052101

    2004

  35. [35]

    The Three-Boson System at Next-To-Next-To-Leading Order,

    L. Platter and D. R. Phillips, “The Three-Boson System at Next-To-Next-To-Leading Order,” Few Body Syst.40 (2006) 35

    2006

  36. [36]

    Effective Field Theory Analy- sis of Three-Boson Systems at Next-To-Next-To-Leading Order,

    C. Ji and D. R. Phillips, “Effective Field Theory Analy- sis of Three-Boson Systems at Next-To-Next-To-Leading Order,” Few Body Syst.54(2013) 2317

    2013

  37. [37]

    Effective Field Theory for Few-Boson Systems,

    B. Bazak, M. Eliyahu and U. van Kolck, “Effective Field Theory for Few-Boson Systems,” Phys. Rev. A94(2016) 052502

    2016

  38. [38]

    Improved action for contact effective field theory,

    L. Contessi, M. Schäfer and U. van Kolck, “Improved action for contact effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. A 109(2024) 022814

    2024

  39. [39]

    Four- boson first excited state near two-body unitarity,

    F. Wu, T. Frederico, R. Higa and U. van Kolck, “Four- boson first excited state near two-body unitarity,” Phys. Rev. A109(2024) 043301

    2024

  40. [40]

    Small clusters of He atoms in finite-cutoff EFT,

    B. Bazak, “Small clusters of He atoms in finite-cutoff EFT,” arXiv:2511.12538 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Three- and four-boson systems expanded around the unitarity limit: Application to4He,

    F. Wu, X. Lin, U. van Kolck and S. König, “Three- and four-boson systems expanded around the unitarity limit: Application to4He,” [arXiv:2606.00854 [cond-mat.quant- gas]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids,

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs and G. Ra- jagopal, “Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids,” Rev. Mod. Phys.73(2001) 33

    2001

  43. [43]

    Ground-statepropertiesofunitarybosons: fromclusters to matter,

    J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, U. van Kolck and S. A. Vitiello, “Ground-statepropertiesofunitarybosons: fromclusters to matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 223002

    2017

  44. [44]

    Quantum Monte Carlo studies of a trimer scaling function with microscopic two- and three- body interactions,

    L. Madeira, T. Frederico, S. Gandolfi, L. Tomio and M. T. Yamashita, “Quantum Monte Carlo studies of a trimer scaling function with microscopic two- and three- body interactions,” Phys. Rev. A104(2021) 033301

    2021

  45. [45]

    Determina- tion of the Bond Length and Binding Energy of the He- lium Dimer by Diffraction from a Transmission Grating,

    R. E. Grisenti, W. Schöllkopf, J. P. Toennies, G. C. Hegerfeldt, T. Kohler and M. Stoll, “Determina- tion of the Bond Length and Binding Energy of the He- lium Dimer by Diffraction from a Transmission Grating,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 2284

    2000

  46. [46]

    Imaging the structure of the trimer systems 4He3 and 3He4He2,

    J. Voigtsberger, S. Zeller, J. Becht, N. Neumann, F. Sturm, H.-K. Kim, M. Waitz, F. Trinter, M. Ku- nitski, A. Kalinin, J. Wu, W. Schöllkopf, D. Bres- sanini, A. Czasch, J. B. Williams, K. Ullmann-Pfleger, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, M. S. Schöffler, R. E. Grisenti, T. Jahnke and R. Dörner, “Imaging the structure of the trimer systems 4He3 and 3He4He2,” Nature Com...

    2014

  47. [47]

    Imaging the He2 quantum halo state using a free electron laser,

    S. Zeller, M. Kunitski, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, A. Schottelius, C. Schober, M. Waitz, H. Sann, A. Har- tung and T. Bauer,et al.“Imaging the He2 quantum halo state using a free electron laser,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(2016) 4651

    2016

  48. [48]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details of the EFT calibration, extrapola- tion procedure, and additional cluster results

  49. [49]

    Solving the quantum many- body problem with artificial neural networks,

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, “Solving the quantum many- body problem with artificial neural networks,” Science 355(2017) 602

    2017

  50. [50]

    Hidden- nucleons neural-network quantum states for the nuclear many-body problem,

    A. Lovato, C. Adams, G. Carleo and N. Rocco, “Hidden- nucleons neural-network quantum states for the nuclear many-body problem,” Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 043178

    2022

  51. [51]

    Nuclei with up toA= 6nucleons with artificial neural network wave functions,

    A. Gnech, C. Adams, N. Brawand, G. Carleo, A. Lovato and N. Rocco, “Nuclei with up toA= 6nucleons with artificial neural network wave functions,” Few Body Syst. 63(2022) 7

    2022

  52. [52]

    Synergy between deep neural networks and the variational Monte Carlo method for small 4HeN clusters,

    W. Freitas and S. A. Vitiello, “Synergy between deep neural networks and the variational Monte Carlo method for small 4HeN clusters,” Quantum7(2023) 1209

    2023

  53. [53]

    Modeling4HeN clusters with wave functions based on neural networks,

    W. Freitas, B. Abreu and S. A. Vitiello, “Modeling4HeN clusters with wave functions based on neural networks,” J. Low Temp. Phys.215(2024) 357

    2024

  54. [54]

    Nuclear Physics Around the Unitarity Limit,

    S. König, H. W. Grießhammer, H.-W. Hammer and U. van Kolck, “Nuclear Physics Around the Unitarity Limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 202501

    2017

  55. [55]

    Energies and radii of light nuclei around uni- tarity,

    S. König, “Energies and radii of light nuclei around uni- tarity,” Eur. Phys. J. A56(2020) 113

    2020

  56. [56]

    Unitarity and Discrete Scale Invariance,

    U. van Kolck, “Unitarity and Discrete Scale Invariance,” Few-Body Syst.58(2017) 112

    2017

  57. [57]

    The thermody- namic properties of liquid 3He–4He mixtures between 0 and 20 atm in the limit of absolute zero temperature,

    R. De Bruyn Ouboter and C. N. Yang, “The thermody- namic properties of liquid 3He–4He mixtures between 0 and 20 atm in the limit of absolute zero temperature,” Physica B+C144(1987) 127

    1987

  58. [58]

    Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering,

    H. A. Bethe, “Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering,” Phys. Rev.76(1949) 38

    1949

  59. [59]

    Scattering length and effective range of microscopic two-body potentials,

    M. Macêdo-Lima and L. Madeira, “Scattering length and effective range of microscopic two-body potentials,” Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis.45(2023) e20230079

    2023

  60. [60]

    Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics,

    R. Jackiw, “Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics,” MIT-CTP- 1937 (1991)

    1937

  61. [61]

    Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions,

    J. R. Taylor, “Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 7 (1972)

    1972

  62. [62]

    Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of the Scattering Phase Shift,

    E. P. Wigner, “Lower Limit for the Energy Derivative of the Scattering Phase Shift,” Phys. Rev.98(1955) 145

    1955

  63. [63]

    Causality and the effective range expansion,

    H.-W. Hammer and D. Lee, “Causality and the effective range expansion,” Annals Phys.325(2010) 2212

    2010

  64. [64]

    How short is too short? Constraining contact interactions in nucleon- nucleon scattering,

    D. R. Phillips and T. D. Cohen, “How short is too short? Constraining contact interactions in nucleon- nucleon scattering,” Phys. Lett. B390(1997) 7

    1997

  65. [65]

    The po- tential of effective field theory in NN scattering,

    S. R. Beane, T. D. Cohen and D. R. Phillips, “The po- tential of effective field theory in NN scattering,” Nucl. Phys. A632(1998) 445

    1998

  66. [66]

    The Interaction Between a Neutron and a Proton and the Structure of H3,

    L. H. Thomas, “The Interaction Between a Neutron and a Proton and the Structure of H3,” Phys. Rev.47(1935) 903

    1935

  67. [67]

    Scaling limit of weakly bound triatomic states,

    T. Frederico, L. Tomio, A. Delfino and A. E. A. Amorim, “Scaling limit of weakly bound triatomic states,” Phys. Rev. A60(1999) R9

    1999

  68. [68]

    Exact renormalization relation and binding energies for three identical bosons,

    L. Chen and P. Zhang, “Exact renormalization relation and binding energies for three identical bosons,” Phys. Rev. A112(2025) 033319

    2025

  69. [69]

    Three-body limit cycle: Universal form for general regulators,

    L. Chen, F. Wu, X. Lin, S. König, U. van Kolck and P. Zhang, “Three-body limit cycle: Universal form for general regulators,” Phys. Rev. A113(2026) 013314

    2026

  70. [70]

    Spectra and Scattering of Light Lattice Nuclei from Effective Field Theory,

    J. Kirscher, N. Barnea, D. Gazit, F. Pederiva and U. van Kolck, “Spectra and Scattering of Light Lattice Nuclei from Effective Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 054002. 1 Supplemental Material: Universality in strongly interacting bosonic clusters In this Supplemental Material, we detail the match- ing of the EFT to the underlying potential, including t...

    2015