pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27913 · v1 · pith:327B4OROnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Metamagnetism in UTe2: the roles of itinerancy and localization

Theodore I. Weinberger , Daniel Shaffer , Zheyu Wu , Dmitry V. Chichinadze , Jinxu Pu , Gang Li , Rui Zhou , Yurii Skourski
show 7 more authors
Dave Graf Andrej Cabala Vladimir Sechovsky Michal Valiska Michal P. Kwasigroch F. Malte Grosche Alexander G. Eaton
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords UTe2metamagnetismsuperconductivityspin fluctuationsKondo interactionRKKY interactionmagnetic anisotropyp-wave pairing
0
0 comments X

The pith

In UTe2 the metamagnetic transition shows separate itinerant and localized contributions, and pressure stabilizes the SC2 superconducting phase by collapsing magnetic anisotropy to enhance longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axi

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents steady-field torque magnetometry and extraction magnetometry data at ambient pressure together with magnetoconductance measurements under pressure on UTe2. These resolve multiple sub-features inside the metamagnetic transition whose temperature dependences differ, which the authors interpret as separate itinerant and localized moment responses. The itinerant part is suggested to connect to a possible spin-density wave. A model of the pressure evolution of Kondo and RKKY couplings is used to argue that magnetic anisotropy collapses under pressure, boosting longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axis that promote p-wave pairing and thereby stabilize the SC2 state below the transition.

Core claim

Steady field torque and magnetometry resolve a complex sub-structure within the metamagnetic transition of UTe2, with separate features that possess different temperature evolutions pointing to distinct contributions from itinerant and localized moments. The itinerant contribution might relate to a possible spin-density wave state. Theoretical modeling of the evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions proposes that the SC2 state is stabilized under pressure due to the collapse of magnetic anisotropy, leading to an enhancement of longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axis, which are pair-forming in the p-wave channel.

What carries the argument

The pressure-driven collapse of magnetic anisotropy that enhances longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axis, modeled through the evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions.

If this is right

  • The SC2 superconducting phase lies directly below the metamagnetic transition and is truncated by it, while SC3 lies predominantly above the transition and is stabilized by it.
  • Distinct temperature evolutions of sub-features inside the transition allow separation of itinerant and localized moment responses.
  • The itinerant contribution inside the transition may indicate an underlying spin-density wave state.
  • Enhancement of longitudinal fluctuations along the hard b axis under pressure is pair-forming specifically in the p-wave channel for SC2.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anisotropy collapse is a generic response to pressure in uranium heavy-fermion systems, analogous stabilization of field-induced superconducting phases may occur in related compounds.
  • The proposed distinction between itinerant and localized contributions could be checked by comparing the temperature scales of the sub-features to neutron-scattering measurements of spin fluctuations.
  • The parameter-free modeling implies that the location of the anisotropy collapse is fixed by the ambient-pressure data, providing a sharp target for future pressure experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The temperature-dependent sub-features resolved in steady-field torque and magnetometry data correspond to physically distinct itinerant versus localized moment contributions whose pressure evolution can be captured by Kondo and RKKY changes without additional free parameters.

What would settle it

High-resolution steady-field data showing a single smooth metamagnetic transition without distinct temperature-dependent sub-features, or pressure-dependent measurements in which the anisotropy does not collapse in tandem with the stabilization of the SC2 phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27913 by Alexander G. Eaton, Andrej Cabala, Daniel Shaffer, Dave Graf, Dmitry V. Chichinadze, F. Malte Grosche, Gang Li, Jinxu Pu, Michal P. Kwasigroch, Michal Valiska, Rui Zhou, Theodore I. Weinberger, Vladimir Sechovsky, Yurii Skourski, Zheyu Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Ambient pressure low temperature phase diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Contactless resistivity measurements of UTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Contactless resistivity of UTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The metamagnetic transition in UTe$_2$ plays a key role in stabilizing two enigmatic field-induced superconducting phases. One of these phases (SC2) is truncated by the transition, lying directly below it, while the other (SC3) sits predominantly above it and appears to be stabilized because of it. While numerous pulsed field studies have examined this transition, comparatively few steady field experiments have investigated it. Here we report a suite of measurements of metamgnetism in UTe$_2$, at ambient pressure by torque magnetometry and extraction magnetometry techniques, and of the magnetoconductance under pressure. Our steady field measurements resolve a complex sub-structure within the transition, with separate features that possess different temperature evolutions, pointing to distinct contributions from itinerant and localized moments. The itinerant contribution might relate to a possible spin-density wave state. We theoretically model the evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions and propose that the SC2 state is stabilized under pressure due to the collapse of magnetic anisotropy, leading to an enhancement of longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard $b$ axis, which are pair-forming in the $p$-wave channel.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports steady-field torque magnetometry and extraction magnetometry at ambient pressure on UTe2, resolving sub-structure within the metamagnetic transition whose features exhibit distinct temperature evolutions, interpreted as separate itinerant (possibly SDW) and localized-moment contributions. Magnetoconductance data under pressure are also presented. A theoretical model of the pressure evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions is advanced to argue that the SC2 superconducting phase is stabilized by collapse of magnetic anisotropy, which enhances longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axis that are pair-forming in the p-wave channel.

Significance. If the sub-structure is shown to arise from physically distinct contributions and the Kondo/RKKY model is demonstrated to be constrained without post-hoc adjustment, the work would clarify the interplay between metamagnetism, anisotropy, and the stabilization of field-induced superconductivity in UTe2, complementing existing pulsed-field studies. The steady-field approach is a clear strength. At present the absence of quantitative metrics, error analysis, and explicit model derivation limits the assessed significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract/Results] Abstract and experimental results: the claim that resolved sub-features possess different temperature evolutions pointing to distinct itinerant versus localized contributions supplies no quantitative data, error bars, fitting parameters, or exclusion criteria, rendering the attribution load-bearing for the central interpretation but unsupported.
  2. [Theoretical model] Theoretical modeling section: the assertion that pressure evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions produces anisotropy collapse and enhanced b-axis longitudinal fluctuations is presented without derivation details, fitting protocol, or demonstration that parameters are fixed by ambient-pressure data rather than adjusted to the pressure-dependent magnetoconductance; this directly affects the SC2 stabilization argument.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion: the link from ambient-pressure sub-structure to the pressure-tuned model and the p-wave pairing mechanism requires explicit comparison to alternative models and falsifiable predictions testable against the reported magnetoconductance data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Ensure all figures include error bars and specify the precise criteria used to identify and label the sub-features in torque and magnetometry traces.
  2. [Notation] Clarify notation for the superconducting phases (SC2, SC3) and metamagnetic features consistently across text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract/Results] Abstract and experimental results: the claim that resolved sub-features possess different temperature evolutions pointing to distinct itinerant versus localized contributions supplies no quantitative data, error bars, fitting parameters, or exclusion criteria, rendering the attribution load-bearing for the central interpretation but unsupported.

    Authors: We agree that the current version lacks sufficient quantitative support for distinguishing the sub-features. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the extracted transition fields, report the fitting parameters and uncertainties for the temperature evolutions of each feature, and explicitly state the criteria used to separate the itinerant and localized contributions. These additions will place the interpretation on a firmer quantitative footing. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theoretical model] Theoretical modeling section: the assertion that pressure evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions produces anisotropy collapse and enhanced b-axis longitudinal fluctuations is presented without derivation details, fitting protocol, or demonstration that parameters are fixed by ambient-pressure data rather than adjusted to the pressure-dependent magnetoconductance; this directly affects the SC2 stabilization argument.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the modeling section is insufficiently detailed. The revised version will include the full derivation of the pressure-dependent Kondo and RKKY terms, the complete fitting protocol, and an explicit demonstration that all parameters are constrained by the ambient-pressure data set. We will show that the pressure evolution of the magnetoconductance is a prediction of the model rather than an input used for adjustment. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the link from ambient-pressure sub-structure to the pressure-tuned model and the p-wave pairing mechanism requires explicit comparison to alternative models and falsifiable predictions testable against the reported magnetoconductance data.

    Authors: We will expand the discussion to include direct comparisons with alternative scenarios for SC2 stabilization. We will also formulate specific, falsifiable predictions arising from the anisotropy-collapse mechanism and show how they can be tested against the magnetoconductance data already presented in the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Kondo/RKKY pressure-evolution model invoked to explain SC2 stabilization lacks shown independent constraints from ambient data

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We theoretically model the evolution of Kondo and RKKY interactions and propose that the SC2 state is stabilized under pressure due to the collapse of magnetic anisotropy, leading to an enhancement of longitudinal spin fluctuations along the hard b axis, which are pair-forming in the p-wave channel."

    The model is asserted to produce the anisotropy collapse and fluctuation enhancement that stabilizes SC2, yet the abstract supplies no fixed parameters constrained solely by ambient data or independent of the temperature-dependent sub-features resolved in the torque/magnetometry measurements; the pressure evolution therefore functions as a fit to the same inputs used to identify itinerant vs localized contributions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on steady-field torque/magnetometry resolving distinct itinerant vs localized sub-features at ambient pressure, followed by a theoretical model of Kondo/RKKY evolution under pressure that produces anisotropy collapse and enhanced b-axis fluctuations. No equations, fixed-parameter protocol, or external benchmark is quoted in the provided text to demonstrate the model is not adjusted to reproduce the same temperature-dependent features used to define the sub-structure. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern at the load-bearing step, but without explicit reduction to an equation or self-citation chain the circularity is partial rather than total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the model is described as using standard Kondo and RKKY interactions whose pressure dependence is asserted without further specification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5804 in / 1187 out tokens · 48248 ms · 2026-06-29T03:08:05.521959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We can thus see that the anisotropy of the RKKY inter- action is very sensitive to changes in temperature as well as the degree of localization

    found that magnetic order along the CEF hard-axis takes place in more itinerant systems, whereas magnetic order along the CEF easy-axis takes place in more local- ized magnets (lower ratio of coherence to RKKY energy). We can thus see that the anisotropy of the RKKY inter- action is very sensitive to changes in temperature as well as the degree of localiz...

  2. [2]

    S. Ran, C. Eckberg, Q. P. Ding, Y. Furukawa, T. Metz, S. R. Saha, I. L. Liu, M. Zic, H. Kim, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet supercon- ductivity, Science365, 684 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    D. Aoki, A. Nakamura, F. Honda, D. X. Li, Y. Homma, Y. Shimizu, Y. J. Sato, G. Knebel, J. P. Brison, A. Pour- ret, D. Braithwaite, G. Lapertot, Q. Niu, M. Valiˇ ska, H. Harima, and J. Flouquet, Unconventional Supercon- ductivity in Heavy Fermion UTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 43702 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    D. Aoki, J. P. Brison, J. Flouquet, K. Ishida, G. Knebel, Y. Tokunaga, and Y. Yanase, Unconventional supercon- ductivity in UTe2, J. Phys. Condens. Matter34, 243002 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    S. K. Lewin, C. E. Frank, S. Ran, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, A Review of UTe2 at High Magnetic Fields, Rep. Prog. Phys. (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    S. Ran, I. L. Liu, Y. S. Eo, D. J. Campbell, P. M. Neves, W. T. Fuhrman, S. R. Saha, C. Eckberg, H. Kim, D. Graf, F. Balakirev, J. Singleton, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductiv- ity, Nat. Phys.15, 1250 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Knebel, W

    G. Knebel, W. Knafo, A. Pourret, Q. Niu, M. Valiˇ ska, D. Braithwaite, G. Lapertot, M. Nardone, A. Zi- touni, S. Mishra, I. Sheikin, G. Seyfarth, J. P. Brison, D. Aoki, and J. Flouquet, Field-Reentrant Superconduc- tivity Close to a Metamagnetic Transition in the Heavy- Fermion Superconductor UTe 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 63707 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Braithwaite, M

    D. Braithwaite, M. Valiˇ ska, G. Knebel, G. Lapertot, J. P. Brison, A. Pourret, M. E. Zhitomirsky, J. Flou- quet, F. Honda, and D. Aoki, Multiple superconducting phases in a nearly ferromagnetic system, Commun. Phys. 2, 147 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    S. M. Thomas, F. B. Santos, M. H. Christensen, T. Asaba, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson, E. D. Bauer, R. M. Fernandes, G. Fabbris, and P. F. Rosa, Evidence for a pressure-induced antiferromagnetic quantum criti- cal point in intermediate-valence UTe2, Sci. Adv.6, 8709 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    D. Aoki, F. Honda, G. Knebel, D. Braithwaite, A. Naka- mura, D. Li, Y. Homma, Y. Shimizu, Y. J. Sato, J.-P. Brison,et al., Multiple superconducting phases and un- usual enhancement of the upper critical field in UTe 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89, 053705 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    W.-C. Lin, D. J. Campbell, S. Ran, I.-L. Liu, H. Kim, A. H. Nevidomskyy, D. Graf, N. P. Butch, and J. Paglione, Tuning magnetic confinement of spin-triplet superconductivity, npj Quantum Mater.5, 68 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    D. Aoki, M. Kimata, Y. J. Sato, G. Knebel, F. Honda, A. Nakamura, D. Li, Y. Homma, Y. Shimizu, W. Knafo, D. Braithwaite, M. Valiˆ ska, A. Pourret, J. P. Brison, and J. Flouquet, Field-Induced Superconductivity near the Superconducting Critical Pressure in UTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 074705 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    S. Ran, S. R. Saha, I.-L. Liu, D. Graf, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Expansion of the high field-boosted su- perconductivity in UTe 2 under pressure, npj Quantum Mater.6, 75 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Rosuel, C

    A. Rosuel, C. Marcenat, G. Knebel, T. Klein, A. Pourret, N. Marquardt, Q. Niu, S. Rousseau, A. Demuer, G. Sey- farth, G. Lapertot, D. Aoki, D. Braithwaite, J. Flou- quet, and J. P. Brison, Field-Induced Tuning of the Pair- ing State in a Superconductor, Phys. Rev. X13, 011022 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Honda, S

    F. Honda, S. Kobayashi, N. Kawamura, S. I. Kawaguchi, T. Koizumi, Y. J. Sato, Y. Homma, N. Ishimatsu, J. Gouchi, Y. Uwatoko,et al., Pressure-induced Struc- tural Phase Transition and New Superconducting Phase in UTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 044702 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Sch¨ onemann, P

    R. Sch¨ onemann, P. F. Rosa, S. M. Thomas, Y. Lai, D. N. Nguyen, J. Singleton, E. L. Brosha, R. D. McDonald, V. Zapf, B. Maiorov,et al., Sudden adiabaticity signals reentrant bulk superconductivity in UTe 2, PNAS Nexus 3, pgad428 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Z. Wu, T. Weinberger, J. Chen, A. Cabala, D. Chichi- nadze, D. Shaffer, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, J. Prokleˇ ska, T. Haidamak, G. Bastien,et al., Enhanced triplet superconductivity in next-generation ultraclean UTe 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA121, e2403067121 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    T. Helm, M. Kimata, K. Sudo, A. Miyata, J. Stirnat, T. F¨ orster, J. Hornung, M. K¨ onig, I. Sheikin, A. Pourret, et al., Field-induced compensation of magnetic exchange as the possible origin of reentrant superconductivity in UTe2, Nat. Commun.15, 37 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Z. Wu, J. Chen, T. I. Weinberger, A. Cabala, V. Se- chovsk´ y, M. Valiˇ ska, P. L. Alireza, A. G. Eaton, and F. M. Grosche, Magnetic Signatures of Pressure-Induced Multicomponent Superconductivity in UTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 236501 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Knafo, T

    W. Knafo, T. Thebault, S. Raymond, P. Manuel, D. D. Khalyavin, F. Orlandi, E. Ressouche, K. Beauvois, 10 G. Lapertot, K. Kaneko, D. Aoki, D. Braithwaite, and G. Knebel, Incommensurate Antiferromagnetism in UTe2 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. X15, 021075 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Miyake, Y

    A. Miyake, Y. Shimizu, Y. J. Sato, D. Li, A. Nakamura, Y. Homma, F. Honda, J. Flouquet, M. Tokunaga, and D. Aoki, Metamagnetic Transition in Heavy Fermion Su- perconductor UTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88(2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, R. K. W Haselwimmer, M. J. Steiner, E. Pugh, I. R. Walker, S. R. Julian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, D. Braithwaite, and J. Flouquet, Supercon- ductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromag- netism in UGe 2, Nature406, 587 (2000)

    2000

  23. [23]

    D. Aoki, A. Huxley, E. Ressouche, D. Braithwaite, J. Flouquet, J. P. Brison, E. Lhotel, and C. Paulsen, Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in URhGe, Nature413, 613 (2001)

    2001

  24. [24]

    N. T. Huy, A. Gasparini, D. E. de Nijs, Y. Huang, J. C. P. Klaasse, T. Gortenmulder, A. de Visser, A. Hamann, T. G¨ orlach, and H. v. L¨ ohneysen, Superconductivity on the Border of Weak Itinerant Ferromagnetism in UCoGe, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 067006 (2007)

    2007

  25. [25]

    D. Aoki, K. Ishida, and J. Flouquet, Review of U-based Ferromagnetic Superconductors: Comparison between UGe2, URhGe, and UCoGe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 022001 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    S. Ran, H. Kim, I.-L. Liu, S. R. Saha, I. Hayes, T. Metz, Y. S. Eo, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Enhancement and reentrance of spin triplet superconductivity in UTe 2 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B101, 140503 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    C. Duan, K. Sasmal, M. B. Maple, A. Podlesnyak, J.- X. Zhu, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Incommensurate Spin Fluc- tuations in the Spin-Triplet Superconductor Candidate UTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 237003 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    C. Duan, R. E. Baumbach, A. Podlesnyak, Y. Deng, C. Moir, A. J. Breindel, M. B. Maple, E. M. Nica, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Resonance from antiferromagnetic spin fluc- tuations for superconductivity in UTe2, Nature600, 636 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Knafo, G

    W. Knafo, G. Knebel, P. Steffens, K. Kaneko, A. Ro- suel, J.-P. Brison, J. Flouquet, D. Aoki, G. Lapertot, and S. Raymond, Low-dimensional antiferromagnetic fluctu- ations in the heavy-fermion paramagnetic ladder com- pound UTe2, Phys. Rev. B104, L100409 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Sundar, S

    S. Sundar, S. Gheidi, K. Akintola, A. M. Cˆ ot´ e, S. R. Dunsiger, S. Ran, N. P. Butch, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, and J. E. Sonier, Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctua- tions and superconductivity in the actinide superconduc- tor UTe2, Phys. Rev. B100, 140502 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Azari, M

    N. Azari, M. Yakovlev, N. Rye, S. R. Dunsiger, S. Sun- dar, M. M. Bordelon, S. M. Thomas, J. D. Thompson, P. F. S. Rosa, and J. E. Sonier, Absence of Spontaneous Magnetic Fields due to Time-Reversal Symmetry Break- ing in Bulk Superconducting UTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 226504 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Kreisel, Y

    A. Kreisel, Y. Quan, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Spin-triplet superconductivity driven by finite-momentum spin fluc- tuations, Phys. Rev. B105, 104507 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Kinjo, H

    K. Kinjo, H. Fujibayashi, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, Y. Tokunaga, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, A. Nakamura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Homma, D. X. Li, F. Honda, D. Aoki, K. Hiraki, M. Kimata, and T. Sasaki, Change of super- conducting character in UTe2 induced by magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B107, L060502 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Tokunaga, H

    Y. Tokunaga, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, P. Opletal, Y. Tokiwa, Y. Haga, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, D. Aoki, G. Knebel, G. Lapertot, S. Kr¨ amer, and M. Horvati´ c, Longitudinal Spin Fluctuations Driving Field-Reinforced Supercon- ductivity in UTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 226503 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Tokiwa, P

    Y. Tokiwa, P. Opletal, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, E. Ya- mamoto, M. Kimata, S. Awaji, T. Sasaki, D. Aoki, Y. Haga, and Y. Tokunaga, Reinforcement of supercon- ductivity by quantum critical fluctuations of metamag- netism in UTe2, Phys. Rev. B109, L140502 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Vasina, D

    T. Vasina, D. Aoki, A. Miyake, G. Seyfarth, A. Pourret, C. Marcenat, M. Amano Patino, G. Lapertot, J. Flou- quet, J.-P. Brison, D. Braithwaite, and G. Knebel, Con- necting High-Field and High-Pressure Superconductivity in UTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096501 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Kinjo, H

    K. Kinjo, H. Fujibayashi, H. Matsumura, F. Hori, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, Y. Tokunaga, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, A. Nakamura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Homma, D. Li, F. Honda, and D. Aoki, Superconducting spin reorien- tation in spin-triplet multiple superconducting phases of UTe2, Sci. Adv.9, eadg2736 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Z. Wu, H. Chen, T. I. Weinberger, A. Cabala, D. E. Graf, Y. Skourski, W. Xie, Y. Ling, Z. Zhu, V. Sechovsk´ y, M. Valiˇ ska, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, Super- conducting critical temperature elevated by intense mag- netic fields, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA122, e2422156122 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Z. Wu, T. I. Weinberger, J. Chen, A. Cabala, D. V. Chichinadze, D. Shaffer, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, J. Prokleˇ ska, T. Haidamak, G. Bastien, V. Sechovsk´ y, A. J. Hickey, M. J. Mancera-Ugarte, S. Benjamin, D. E. Graf, Y. Sk- ourski, G. G. Lonzarich, M. Valiˇ ska, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, Research data supporting: Enhanced triplet superconductivity in next...

    2024

  40. [40]

    Z. Wu, H. Chen, T. I. Weinberger, A. Cabala, D. E. Graf, Y. Skourski, W. Xie, Y. Ling, Z. Zhu, V. Sechovsk´ y, M. Valiˇ ska, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, Research data supporting: Superconducting critical temperature elevated by intense magnetic fields (2025), University of Cambridge Apollo Repository

    2025

  41. [41]

    Miyake, Y

    A. Miyake, Y. Shimizu, Y. J. Sato, D. Li, A. Naka- mura, Y. Homma, F. Honda, J. Flouquet, M. Tokunaga, and D. Aoki, Enhancement and Discontinuity of Effective Mass through the First-Order Metamagnetic Transition in UTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 103702 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Griessen, A capacitance torquemeter for de Haas-van Alphen measurements, Cryogenics13, 375 (1973)

    R. Griessen, A capacitance torquemeter for de Haas-van Alphen measurements, Cryogenics13, 375 (1973)

    1973

  43. [43]

    Y. Sato, S. Kasahara, H. Murayama, Y. Kasahara, E.- G. Moon, T. Nishizaki, T. Loew, J. Porras, B. Keimer, T. Shibauchi,et al., Thermodynamic evidence for a ne- matic phase transition at the onset of the pseudogap in YBa2Cu3Oy, Nat. Phys.13, 1074 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Murayama, Y

    H. Murayama, Y. Sato, R. Kurihara, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, Y. Kasahara, H. Uchiyama, A. Yamamoto, E.-G. Moon, J. Cai,et al., Diagonal nematicity in the pseudogap phase of HgBa 2CuO4+δ, Nat. Commun.10, 3282 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    A. G. Eaton, T. I. Weinberger, N. J. M. Popiel, Z. Wu, A. J. Hickey, A. Cabala, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, J. Prokleˇ ska, T. Haidamak, G. Bastien, P. Opletal, H. Sakai, Y. Haga, R. Nowell, S. M. Benjamin, V. Sechovsk´ y, G. G. Lon- zarich, F. M. Grosche, and M. Valiˇ ska, Quasi-2D Fermi surface in the anomalous superconductor UTe 2, Nat. 11 Commun.15, 223 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Kamat, J

    S. Kamat, J. Dans, S. Saha, A. D. Kokovin, J. Paglione, J. Schmalian, and B. J. Ramshaw, Thermodynamic Dis- covery of Tetracriticality and Emergent Multicomponent Superconductivity in UTe 2 (2026), arXiv:2603.17905 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Valiˇ ska, W

    M. Valiˇ ska, W. Knafo, G. Knebel, G. Lapertot, D. Aoki, and D. Braithwaite, Magnetic reshuffling and feedback on superconductivity in UTe 2 under pressure, Physical Review B104, 214507 (2021), 2108.13247

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Weinberger, Z

    T. Weinberger, Z. Wu, A. Hickey, D. Graf, G. Li, P. Wang, R. Zhou, A. Cabala, J. Pu, V. Sechovsky, M. Valiska, G. Lonzarich, F. Grosche, and A. Eaton, Pressure-enhancedf-electron orbital weighting in UTe 2 mapped by quantum interferometry, Commun. Phys.8, 454 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Sakai, P

    H. Sakai, P. Opletal, Y. Tokiwa, E. Yamamoto, Y. Toku- naga, S. Kambe, and Y. Haga, Single crystal growth of superconducting UTe2 by molten salt flux method, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 073401 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    C. T. Van Degrift, Tunnel diode oscillator for 0.001 ppm measurements at low temperatures, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46, 599 (1975)

    1975

  51. [51]

    T. I. Weinberger, Z. Wu, D. E. Graf, Y. Skourski, A. Ca- bala, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, J. Prokleˇ ska, T. Haidamak, G. Bastien, V. Sechovsk´ y, G. G. Lonzarich, M. Valiˇ ska, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, Quantum Interference be- tween Quasi-2D Fermi Surface Sheets in UTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 266503 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Knebel, A

    G. Knebel, A. Pourret, S. Rousseau, N. Marquardt, D. Braithwaite, F. Honda, D. Aoki, G. Lapertot, W. Knafo, G. Seyfarth, J.-P. Brison, and J. Flouquet,c- axis electrical transport at the metamagnetic transition in the heavy-fermion superconductor UTe 2 under pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B109, 155103 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Z. Wu, H. Chen, M. Long, G. Jin, H. Zuo, D. Shaffer, D. V. Chichinadze, A. Cabala, V. Sechovsky, M. Valiska, Z. Zhu, G. G. Lonzarich, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, Metamagnetic ripples in the UTe2 high magnetic field phase diagram (2025), arXiv:2503.11362

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Burdin and V

    S. Burdin and V. Zlati´ c, Multiple temperature scales of the periodic Anderson model: Slave boson approach, Phys. Rev. B79, 115139 (2009)

    2009

  55. [55]

    B. H. Bernhard, Metamagnetism and tricritical behavior in the Kondo lattice model, Phys. Rev. B106, 054436 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Thomas, S

    C. Thomas, S. Burdin, and C. Lacroix, Metamagnetic transition in the twoforbitals Kondo lattice model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 445601 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Takabatake, F

    T. Takabatake, F. Iga, T. Yoshino, Y. Echizen, K. Ka- toh, K. Kobayashi, M. Higa, N. Shimizu, Y. Bando, G. Nakamoto,et al., Ce-and Yb-based Kondo semicon- ductors, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.177, 277 (1998)

    1998

  58. [58]

    Goltsev and M

    A. Goltsev and M. Abd-Elmeguid, Origin of the pres- sure dependence of the Kondo temperature in Ce-and Yb-based heavy-fermion compounds, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter17, S813 (2005)

    2005

  59. [59]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed matter field theory(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    Coleman,Introduction to many-body physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to many-body physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    Fujimori, I

    S.-i. Fujimori, I. Kawasaki, Y. Takeda, H. Yamagami, A. Nakamura, Y. Homma, and D. Aoki, Electronic Struc- ture of UTe 2 Studied by Photoelectron Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 103701 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    L. Miao, S. Liu, Y. Xu, E. C. Kotta, C.-J. Kang, S. Ran, J. Paglione, G. Kotliar, N. P. Butch, J. D. Denlinger, and L. A. Wray, Low Energy Band Structure and Symme- tries of UTe 2 from Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076401 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    D. Li, A. Nakamura, F. Honda, Y. J. Sato, Y. Homma, Y. Shimizu, J. Ishizuka, Y. Yanase, G. Knebel, J. Flou- quet, and D. Aoki, Magnetic properties under pressure in novel spin-triplet superconductor UTe 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 073703 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    Ishizuka and Y

    J. Ishizuka and Y. Yanase, Periodic Anderson model for magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2, Phys. Rev. B 103, 094504 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    Shishidou, H

    T. Shishidou, H. G. Suh, P. M. R. Brydon, M. Weinert, and D. F. Agterberg, Topological band and superconduc- tivity in UTe2, Phys. Rev. B103, 104504 (2021)

    2021

  66. [66]

    A. B. Shick, S.-i. Fujimori, and W. E. Pickett, UTe 2: A nearly insulating half-filledj= 5 25f 3 heavy-fermion metal, Phys. Rev. B103, 125136 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    S. Liu, Y. Xu, E. C. Kotta, L. Miao, S. Ran, J. Paglione, N. P. Butch, J. D. Denlinger, Y.-D. Chuang, and L. A. Wray, Identifyingf-electron symmetries of UTe 2 with O- edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241111 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Wilhelm, J.-P

    F. Wilhelm, J.-P. Sanchez, D. Braithwaite, G. Knebel, G. Lapertot, and A. Rogalev, Investigating the electronic states of UTe2 using X-ray spectroscopy, Commun. Phys. 6, 96 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Hazra and P

    T. Hazra and P. Coleman, Triplet Pairing Mechanisms from Hund’s-Kondo Models: Applications to UTe 2 and CeRh2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 136002 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Khmelevskyi, L

    S. Khmelevskyi, L. V. Pourovskii, and E. A. Tereshina- Chitrova, Structure of the normal state and origin of the Schottky anomaly in the correlated heavy-fermion super- conductor UTe2, Phys. Rev. B107, 214501 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    D. S. Christovam, M. Sundermann, A. Marino, D. Takegami, J. Falke, P. Dolmantas, M. Harder, H. Gre- tarsson, B. Keimer, A. Gloskovskii, M. W. Haverkort, I. Elfimov, G. Zwicknagl, A. V. Andreev, L. Havela, M. M. Bordelon, E. D. Bauer, P. F. S. Rosa, A. Severing, and L. H. Tjeng, Stabilization of U 5f 2 configuration in UTe2 through U 6ddimers in the presen...

    2024

  72. [72]

    Z. Wu, T. I. Weinberger, A. J. Hickey, D. V. Chichinadze, D. Shaffer, A. Cabala, H. Chen, M. Long, T. J. Brumm, W. Xie, Y. Ling, Z. Zhu, Y. Skourski, D. E. Graf, V. Se- chovsk´ y, M. Valiˇ ska, G. G. Lonzarich, F. M. Grosche, and A. G. Eaton, A Quantum Critical Line Bounds the High Field Metamagnetic Transition Surface in UTe 2, Phys. Rev. X15, 021019 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Scott and M

    E. Scott and M. Kwasigroch, Destabilization of local magnetic anisotropy in heavy-fermion compounds, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043225 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    McCollam, M

    A. McCollam, M. Fu, and S. Julian, Lifshitz transi- tion underlying the metamagnetic transition of UPt 3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 075804 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    Tokunaga, H

    Y. Tokunaga, H. Sakai, S. Kambe, T. Hattori, N. Higa, G. Nakamine, S. Kitagawa, K. Ishida, A. Nakamura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Homma, D. Li, F. Honda, and D. Aoki, 125Te-NMR Study on a Single Crystal of Heavy Fermion Superconductor UTe 2, J. Phy. Soc. Jpn.88, 073701 (2019)

    2019

  76. [76]

    Azari, M

    N. Azari, M. R. Goeks, M. Yakovlev, M. Abedi, S. R. 12 Dunsiger, S. M. Thomas, J. D. Thompson, P. F. S. Rosa, and J. E. Sonier,µ + Knight shift in UTe 2: Evidence for relocalization in a Kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L081103 (2023)

    2023

  77. [77]

    Azari, M

    N. Azari, M. Yakovlev, S. R. Dunsiger, O. P. Uzoh, E. Mun, B. M. Huddart, S. J. Blundell, M. M. Borde- lon, S. M. Thomas, J. D. Thompson, P. F. S. Rosa, and J. E. Sonier, Coexistence of Kondo coherence and local- ized magnetic moments in the normal state of molten salt-flux grown UTe2, Phys. Rev. B111, 014513 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Amorese, M

    A. Amorese, M. Sundermann, B. Leedahl, A. Marino, D. Takegami, H. Gretarsson, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, M. W. Haverkort, Y. Huang, M. Szlawska, D. Kaczorowski, S. Ran, M. B. Maple, E. D. Bauer, A. Leithe-Jasper, P. Hansmann, P. Thalmeier, L. H. Tjeng, and A. Severing, From antiferromagnetic and hidden order to Pauli paramagnetism in UM 2Si2 com- pound...

    2020

  79. [79]

    Y. Deng, E. Lee-Wong, C. M. Moir, R. S. Kumar, N. Swedan, C. Park, D. Y. Popov, Y. Xiao, P. Chow, R. E. Baumbach, R. J. Hemley, P. S. Riseborough, and M. B. Maple, Structural transition and uranium valence change in ute2 at high pressure revealed by x-ray diffrac- tion and spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B110, 075140 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Lester, S

    C. Lester, S. Ramos, R. Perry, T. Croft, R. Bewley, T. Guidi, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, E. Forgan, and S. Hayden, Field-tunable spin-density-wave phases in Sr3Ru2O7, Nat. Mater.14, 373 (2015)

    2015

Showing first 80 references.