pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28110 · v1 · pith:3RJQPOTLnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.AG· math.MP

Abelian Orbifolds for Brane Brick Models

Juno Kwon , Rak-Kyeong Seong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.AGmath.MP
keywords brane brick modelsabelian orbifoldstoric Calabi-Yau 4-folds2d (0,2) gauge theoriesJ-termsE-termschiral cyclesorbifold consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

The consistency requirement on J- and E-terms of an orbifolded brane brick model reproduces the Calabi-Yau condition on the orbifold action.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic procedure to construct brane brick models for abelian orbifolds of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds from a given parent model. It demonstrates that the orbifold group action on the generators of the parent space induces corresponding actions on the chiral and Fermi fields and their J- and E-terms. Requiring that the orbifolded model preserves the closed paths tied to those terms and the chiral cycles formed by their products forces the orbifold action to satisfy the Calabi-Yau condition. The procedure supplies explicit formulas expressing the new J- and E-terms directly in terms of the parent theory. The method is illustrated on the models for Q^{1,1,1} and D_3, producing families of 2d (0,2) quiver gauge theories along with generating functions that count the distinct orbifolds.

Core claim

Given a parent brane brick model for a toric Calabi-Yau 4-fold M, the action of an abelian orbifold group Gamma on the generators of M induces an action on the chiral and Fermi fields as well as the J- and E-terms of the associated 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theory. The requirement that the orbifolded brane brick model remains consistent with the closed paths associated with the J- and E-terms, together with the chiral cycles formed by their products, precisely reproduces the Calabi-Yau condition on the orbifold action and yields an explicit formula for the J- and E-terms of the orbifolded model in terms of those of the parent theory.

What carries the argument

The induced action of the abelian orbifold group Gamma on the fields and J-/E-terms, together with the consistency condition on closed paths and chiral cycles that enforces the Calabi-Yau requirement.

If this is right

  • Explicit formulas are obtained for the J- and E-terms of any abelian orbifold of a parent brane brick model.
  • The construction produces infinite families of 2d (0,2) quiver gauge theories for the orbifolds of Q^{1,1,1} and of D_3.
  • Generating functions are derived that enumerate the distinct abelian orbifolds of Q^{1,1,1} and of D_3.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same consistency requirement might supply a route to define orbifold actions on brane brick models whose parent geometries are not toric.
  • The counting functions could be compared with independent enumerations of abelian group actions on the toric diagrams to test completeness.
  • The explicit J- and E-term formulas may allow direct computation of the moduli space for each orbifolded theory without reconstructing the full brick tiling.

Load-bearing premise

The action of an abelian orbifold group on the generators of the parent toric Calabi-Yau 4-fold induces a well-defined action on the chiral and Fermi fields as well as the J- and E-terms.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the orbifolded J- and E-terms for a known abelian orbifold of Q^{1,1,1} in which the closed-path consistency fails while the geometric orbifold action still satisfies the Calabi-Yau condition.

read the original abstract

We present a systematic procedure for constructing brane brick models corresponding to abelian orbifolds of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, extending the orbifold construction beyond the well-studied case of abelian orbifolds of C^4. Given a parent brane brick model corresponding to a toric Calabi-Yau 4-fold M, we show that the action of an abelian orbifold group Gamma on the generators of M induces an action on the chiral and Fermi fields as well as the J- and E-terms of the associated 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theory. The requirement that the orbifolded brane brick model remains consistent with the closed paths associated with the J- and E-terms, together with the chiral cycles formed by their products, precisely reproduces the Calabi-Yau condition on the orbifold action. This procedure yields an explicit formula for the J- and E-terms of the orbifolded brane brick model in terms of those of the parent theory. We apply our construction to the brane brick models corresponding to Q^{1,1,1} and D_3, and present the resulting families of 2d (0,2) quiver gauge theories. We also present explicit expressions for generating functions that count distinct abelian orbifolds of Q^{1,1,1} and D_3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a systematic procedure for constructing brane brick models corresponding to abelian orbifolds of toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds, extending beyond the C^4 case. Given a parent brane brick model for toric CY4 M, the action of abelian group Gamma on the toric generators is shown to induce well-defined actions on chiral/Fermi fields and on the J- and E-terms. Requiring that the orbifolded terms remain consistent with the original closed paths and the chiral cycles they form is claimed to enforce precisely the Calabi-Yau condition on the orbifold action, yielding an explicit formula for the new J/E-terms in terms of the parent. The construction is applied to the known models of Q^{1,1,1} and D_3, producing families of 2d (0,2) quiver gauge theories, and generating functions enumerating the distinct abelian orbifolds are supplied.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the result is significant for the study of 2d (0,2) supersymmetric gauge theories and their geometric engineering via brane brick models. It supplies a direct, parameter-free inductive procedure that automatically reproduces the Calabi-Yau condition as a consistency requirement rather than an external imposition, together with explicit formulas and concrete applications to Q^{1,1,1} and D_3. The generating functions for enumeration constitute a further practical contribution. The absence of ad-hoc adjustments or fitted parameters in the described procedure strengthens the claim.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the procedure 'yields an explicit formula' for the orbifolded J- and E-terms; the main text should present this formula in a single, clearly labeled equation or theorem statement (e.g., in the section describing the general construction) rather than distributing the pieces across multiple paragraphs.
  2. In the applications to Q^{1,1,1} and D_3, the generating functions are described as 'explicit expressions'; including the closed-form expressions (or at least the first few terms with the general term) in the main text or an appendix would improve usability.
  3. Notation for the chiral cycles formed by products of J- and E-terms is introduced in the general construction but could be made uniform when reused in the examples; a short table summarizing the parent and orbifolded cycles for one non-trivial Gamma element would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary and significance assessment of our work, as well as the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct construction

full rationale

The paper presents an explicit inductive construction: the abelian group action on toric generators of the parent CY4 is shown to induce well-defined actions on chiral/Fermi fields and J/E-terms; requiring the orbifolded model to preserve consistency with the original closed paths and chiral cycles is demonstrated to enforce precisely the Calabi-Yau condition, yielding formulas for the new terms. This is a self-contained mathematical equivalence derived from the definitions of the brane brick model and the group action, with no reduction to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, load-bearing self-citations, or smuggled ansatze. The central result is externally falsifiable via explicit application to Q^{1,1,1} and D_3 and does not rely on unverified prior results from the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard domain assumptions of brane brick models and toric geometry; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A parent brane brick model exists and corresponds to a toric Calabi-Yau 4-fold M.
    Invoked at the start of the procedure described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The abelian group action on the generators of M induces consistent actions on the chiral/Fermi fields and J/E-terms.
    Central to the induction step in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5779 in / 1514 out tokens · 49444 ms · 2026-06-29T03:33:26.681267+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and D. Yokoyama,2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-Branes,JHEP09(2015) 072, [1506.03818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers,JHEP02(2016) 047, [1510.01744]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality,JHEP05 (2016) 020, [1602.01834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa,Brane Brick Models in the Mirror,JHEP 02(2017) 106, [1609.01723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Orbifold Reduction and 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories, JHEP03(2017) 016, [1609.07144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Franco, S

    S. Franco, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and C. Vafa,Quadrality for Supersymmetric Matrix Models,JHEP07(2017) 053, [1612.06859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    He, R.-K

    Y.-H. He, R.-K. Seong and S.-T. Yau,Calabi–Yau Volumes and Reflexive Polytopes, Commun. Math. Phys.361(2018) 155–204, [1704.03462]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, S. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Elliptic Genera of 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories from Brane Brick Models,JHEP06(2017) 068, [1702.02948]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Franco and A

    S. Franco and A. Hasan, 3dprinting of2dN= (0,2)gauge theories,JHEP05(2018) 082, [1801.00799]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Closset, D

    C. Closset, D. Ghim and R.-K. Seong,Supersymmetric gauged matrix models from dimensional reduction on a sphere,JHEP05(2018) 026, [1712.10023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Franco and A

    S. Franco and A. Hasan,Graded Quivers, Generalized Dimer Models and Toric Geometry,JHEP11(2019) 104, [1904.07954]

    arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Lagrangian disks

    S. Franco, S. Gukov, S. Lee, R.-K. Seong and J. Sparks,“Lagrangian disks” in M-theory,JHEP11(2020) 033, [1910.01645]

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Kho and R.-K

    M. Kho and R.-K. Seong,On the master space for brane brick models,JHEP09(2023) 150, [2306.16616]

    arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim, G. P. Goulas and R.-K. Seong,Mass deformations of brane brick models,JHEP09(2023) 176, [2307.03220]

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    D. Ghim, M. Kho and R.-K. Seong,Combinatorial and algebraic mutations of toric Fano 3-folds and mass deformations of 2d(0,2) quiver gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 086001, [2407.19924]

    arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    J. Bao, E. Choi, Y.-H. He, R.-K. Seong and S.-T. Yau,Futaki invariants and reflexive polygons,J. Math. Phys.66(2025) 102302, [2410.18476]. – 137 –

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    D. Ghim, M. Kho and R.-K. Seong,Birational transformations and 2d (0, 2) quiver gauge theories beyond toric Fano 3-folds,JHEP06(2025) 032, [2502.08741]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Carcamo, S

    M. Carcamo, S. Franco, D. Ghim, G. P. Goulas and R.-K. Seong,Relevant deformations, brane brick models and triality,JHEP04(2026) 049, [2510.05517]

    arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    V. V. Batyrev,Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for calabi-yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,arXiv preprint alg-geom/9310003(1993)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  20. [20]

    Borisov,Towards the mirror symmetry for calabi-yau complete intersections in gorenstein toric fano varieties,arXiv preprint alg-geom/9310001(1993)

    L. Borisov,Towards the mirror symmetry for calabi-yau complete intersections in gorenstein toric fano varieties,arXiv preprint alg-geom/9310001(1993)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  21. [21]

    Davey, A

    J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya and G. Torri,M2-Branes and Fano 3-folds,J. Phys. A44(2011) 405401, [1103.0553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Franco and R.-K

    S. Franco and R.-K. Seong,Fano 3-folds, reflexive polytopes and brane brick models, JHEP08(2022) 008, [2203.15816]

    arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks,Notes on toric Sasaki-Einstein seven-manifolds and AdS(4) / CFT(3),JHEP11(2008) 016, [0808.0904]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    D. P. Sorokin, V. I. Tkach and D. V. Volkov,ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPACTIFIED VACUA OF D = 11 AND D = 10 SUPERGRAVITIES,Phys. Lett. B161(1985) 301–306

    1985

  25. [25]

    B. E. W. Nilsson and C. N. Pope,Hopf Fibration of Eleven-dimensional Supergravity, Class. Quant. Grav.1(1984) 499

    1984

  26. [26]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. F. Sparks and D. Waldram,A New infinite class of Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 987–1000, [hep-th/0403038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Franco, D

    S. Franco, D. Ghim and R.-K. Seong,Brane brick models for the Sasaki-Einstein 7-manifolds Y p,k(CP1×CP 1) and Y p,k(CP2),JHEP03(2023) 050, [2212.02523]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, J. Park and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Towards M2-brane Theories for Generic Toric Singularities,JHEP12(2008) 110, [0809.3237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties

    W. Fulton,Introduction to toric varieties. No. 131. Princeton university press, 1993

    1993

  30. [30]

    N. C. Leung and C. Vafa,Branes and toric geometry,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 91–118, [hep-th/9711013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    Beasley, B

    C. Beasley, B. R. Greene, C. I. Lazaroiu and M. R. Plesser,D3-branes on partial resolutions of Abelian quotient singularities of Calabi-Yau threefolds,Nucl. Phys. B 566(2000) 599–640, [hep-th/9907186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He,D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality,Nucl. Phys. B595(2001) 165–200, [hep-th/0003085]. – 138 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  33. [33]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, K. D. Kennaway, D. Vegh and B. Wecht,Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,JHEP01(2006) 096, [hep-th/0504110]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  34. [34]

    Hanany and K

    A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway,Dimer models and toric diagrams,hep-th/0503149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Franco, A

    S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, D. Vegh and B. Wecht,Gauge theories from toric geometry and brane tilings,JHEP01(2006) 128, [hep-th/0505211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    Hanany and D

    A. Hanany and D. Vegh,Quivers, tilings, branes and rhombi,JHEP10(2007) 029, [hep-th/0511063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Kenyon,An introduction to the dimer model,arXiv preprint math/0310326(2003)

    R. Kenyon,An introduction to the dimer model,arXiv preprint math/0310326(2003)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  38. [38]

    K. D. Kennaway,Brane Tilings,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22(2007) 2977–3038, [0706.1660]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Yamazaki,Brane Tilings and Their Applications,Fortsch

    M. Yamazaki,Brane Tilings and Their Applications,Fortsch. Phys.56(2008) 555–686, [0803.4474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Hanany and R.-K

    A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong,Brane Tilings and Reflexive Polygons,Fortsch. Phys.60 (2012) 695–803, [1201.2614]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    M. R. Douglas and G. W. Moore,D-branes, quivers, and ALE instantons, hep-th/9603167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison,Orbifold resolution by D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B506(1997) 84–106, [hep-th/9704151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten,Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity,Nucl. Phys. B536(1998) 199–218, [hep-th/9807080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  44. [44]

    Davey, A

    J. Davey, A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong,Counting Orbifolds,JHEP06(2010) 010, [1002.3609]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    Hanany and R.-K

    A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong,Symmetries of Abelian Orbifolds,JHEP01(2011) 027, [1009.3017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    Hanany, D

    A. Hanany, D. Orlando and S. Reffert,Sublattice Counting and Orbifolds,JHEP06 (2010) 051, [1002.2981]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Davey, A

    J. Davey, A. Hanany and R.-K. Seong,An Introduction to Counting Orbifolds,Fortsch. Phys.59(2011) 677–682, [1102.0015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    Hanany, V

    A. Hanany, V. Jejjala, S. Ramgoolam and R.-K. Seong,Calabi-Yau Orbifolds and Torus Coverings,JHEP09(2011) 116, [1105.3471]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    K. Hori, A. Iqbal and C. Vafa,D-branes and mirror symmetry,hep-th/0005247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Cachazo, B

    F. Cachazo, B. Fiol, K. A. Intriligator, S. Katz and C. Vafa,A Geometric unification of dualities,Nucl. Phys. B628(2002) 3–78, [hep-th/0110028]. – 139 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Feng, Y.-H

    B. Feng, Y.-H. He, K. D. Kennaway and C. Vafa,Dimer models from mirror symmetry and quivering amoebae,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.12(2008) 489–545, [hep-th/0511287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    Mohri,D-branes and quotient singularities of Calabi-Yau fourfolds,Nucl

    K. Mohri,D-branes and quotient singularities of Calabi-Yau fourfolds,Nucl. Phys. B 521(1998) 161–182, [hep-th/9707012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    Garcia-Compean and A

    H. Garcia-Compean and A. M. Uranga,Brane box realization of chiral gauge theories in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B539(1999) 329–366, [hep-th/9806177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    Forcella, A

    D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He and A. Zaffaroni,The Master Space of N=1 Gauge Theories,JHEP08(2008) 012, [0801.1585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl

    E. Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B403(1993) 159–222, [hep-th/9301042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  56. [56]

    Benvenuti, B

    S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He,Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics,JHEP11(2007) 050, [hep-th/0608050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [57]

    Hanany and C

    A. Hanany and C. Romelsberger,Counting BPS operators in the chiral ring of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories or N=2 braine surgery,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.11 (2007) 1091–1112, [hep-th/0611346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    Butti, D

    A. Butti, D. Forcella, A. Hanany, D. Vegh and A. Zaffaroni,Counting Chiral Operators in Quiver Gauge Theories,JHEP11(2007) 092, [0705.2771]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  59. [59]

    B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He,Counting gauge invariants: The Plethystic program, JHEP03(2007) 090, [hep-th/0701063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Kho and R.-K

    M. Kho and R.-K. Seong,Hilbert series of bipartite field theories,JHEP09(2024) 020, [2405.19165]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Franco,4d crystal melting, toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds and brane brick models,JHEP 03(2024) 091, [2311.04404]

    S. Franco,4d crystal melting, toric Calabi-Yau 4-folds and brane brick models,JHEP 03(2024) 091, [2311.04404]

    arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Akhtar, T

    M. Akhtar, T. Coates, S. Galkin and A. M. Kasprzyk,Minkowski Polynomials and Mutations,arXiv e-prints(Dec., 2012) arXiv:1212.1785, [1212.1785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Gross, P

    M. Gross, P. Hacking and S. Keel,Birational geometry of cluster algebras,arXiv e-prints(Sept., 2013) arXiv:1309.2573, [1309.2573]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, S. Galkin and A. Kasprzyk,Quantum Periods for 3-Dimensional Fano Manifolds,arXiv e-prints(Mar., 2013) arXiv:1303.3288, [1303.3288]

    arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    Kasprzyk, B

    A. Kasprzyk, B. Nill and T. Prince,Minimality and mutation-equivalence of polygons, arXiv e-prints(Jan., 2015) arXiv:1501.05335, [1501.05335]

    arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. M. Kasprzyk, G. Pitton and K. Tveiten,Maximally mutable Laurent polynomials,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A477(Sept., 2021) 20210584, [2107.14253]. – 140 –

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Franco and R.-K

    S. Franco and R.-K. Seong,Twin theories, polytope mutations and quivers for GTPs, JHEP07(2023) 034, [2302.10951]

    arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    M. Kho, N. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Birational transformations on dimer integrable systems,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L041901, [2504.21081]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    M. Kho, N. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Classification and birational equivalence of dimer integrable systems for reflexive polygons,JHEP02(2026) 084, [2510.12290]

    arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    M. Kho, K. Lee, N. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Integrable Systems for Generalized Toric Polygons and Higgsed 5d N=1 Theories,2603.19353

    arXiv

  71. [71]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov and P. Putrov,(0, 2) trialities,JHEP03(2014) 076, [1310.0818]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Kho, S.-J

    M. Kho, S.-J. Lee and R.-K. Seong,Quiver-invariant dualities between brane tilings, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 126007, [2601.20936]. – 141 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026