pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28501 · v1 · pith:3NNKHRDSnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

A hierarchical Bayesian framework for cosmology using Type 1 AGN variability

J\'ulia Laguna-Miralles , Vasily Belokurov , Miles Cranmer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords Type 1 AGNvariabilitycosmologyhierarchical Bayesianluminosity distanceGaia light curvesfinite baseline
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hierarchical Bayesian model turns Type 1 AGN variability into a standardizable luminosity-distance probe for high-redshift cosmology.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a hierarchical Bayesian framework that exploits the empirical anti-correlation between optical/UV variability amplitude and luminosity to estimate cosmological distances from Type 1 AGN. It targets moderate-baseline light curves from current surveys by first fitting each curve independently to obtain posteriors on window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability, then importance-reweighting those samples under a population model that includes the variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, wavelength dependence, and the distance-redshift relation. This separation keeps per-object fitting cheap while propagating uncertainties to cosmology without repeated light-curve likelihood evaluations during inference. End-to-end closure tests on Gaia DR3-like simulations recover the injected relation, scatter, and cosmological parameters up to expected calibration degeneracies, establishing a proof of concept for the moderate-baseline regime.

Core claim

The framework recovers the injected variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, and distance-redshift parameters from finite-baseline light curves by summarizing each curve with window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability, obtaining independent posterior samples, and importance-reweighting them under the population model; closure tests on Gaia-matched simulations confirm this recovery up to calibration degeneracies.

What carries the argument

Importance reweighting of per-object posterior samples from independent light-curve fits under a population model that links variability amplitude to luminosity, rest-frame wavelength, scatter, and the distance-redshift relation.

If this is right

  • Finite-baseline light curves are more robustly summarized by window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability than by separate long-timescale stochastic parameters.
  • The separation of light-curve fitting from cosmological inference makes catalogue-scale analyses computationally feasible.
  • The approach provides a viable path for AGN-variability distances in the moderate-baseline regime of existing wide-field surveys.
  • Future gains are expected from Gaia DR4, ZTF, DESI-selected AGN, and Rubin/LSST data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could extend luminosity-distance measurements to z>2 where Type 1 AGN are abundant and Type Ia supernovae are unavailable.
  • Incorporating multi-band variability or joint redshift constraints might further reduce calibration degeneracies in applications to real catalogues.
  • Direct tests of the assumed redshift dependence of the variability-luminosity relation on observed AGN samples would be a natural extension.

Load-bearing premise

The empirical anti-correlation between optical/UV variability amplitude and luminosity can be modeled with controlled scatter, redshift dependence, and measurement uncertainty sufficient for cosmological use when applied to finite-baseline light curves.

What would settle it

If end-to-end closure tests on Gaia DR3-like simulated light curves fail to recover the injected distance-redshift parameters within the expected calibration degeneracies, the framework's reliability for cosmology would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Independent luminosity-distance probes beyond the Type Ia supernova range are needed to test cosmic expansion at high redshift. Type 1 AGN are abundant at \(z>2\), but their use for cosmology requires standardizable observables with controlled scatter, redshift dependence, and measurement uncertainty. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework for cosmology using AGN variability, based on the empirical anti-correlation between optical/UV variability amplitude and luminosity. The method targets the moderate-baseline regime of current wide-field time-domain surveys, where individual light curves cannot typically identify the full long-timescale stochastic process, but can constrain finite-window brightness and short-lag variability. Each light curve is fitted independently to obtain posterior samples of these summaries, which are then importance-reweighted under a population model relating variability to luminosity, rest-frame wavelength, intrinsic scatter, and the assumed distance-redshift relation. This framework propagates object-level uncertainty while avoiding repeated light-curve likelihood evaluations during cosmological inference, making catalogue-scale analyses feasible. Using Gaia DR3-like G-band simulations matched to real Gaia cadences, noise properties, and quality cuts, we show that finite-baseline light curves are more robustly summarized by window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability than by the separate long-timescale parameters of stochastic models. End-to-end closure tests recover the injected variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, and distance-redshift parameters up to the expected calibration degeneracies. This Gaia G-band analysis establishes a proof of concept for AGN-variability distances in the moderate-baseline survey regime, with the main gains expected from Gaia DR4, ZTF, DESI-selected AGN samples, and Rubin/LSST-era data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a hierarchical Bayesian framework for cosmological inference from Type 1 AGN variability, exploiting the empirical anti-correlation between optical/UV variability amplitude and luminosity. Individual light curves are summarized via window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability; these summaries are then importance-reweighted under a population model that includes the variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, wavelength dependence, and the distance-redshift relation. Gaia DR3-like simulations are used to demonstrate that these summaries are more robust than full stochastic-process parameters for finite baselines, and end-to-end closure tests recover the injected population and cosmological parameters up to calibration degeneracies. The work positions the method as a proof of concept for moderate-baseline surveys such as Gaia, ZTF, and LSST.

Significance. If the population-model assumptions prove adequate for real data, the approach could supply an independent luminosity-distance probe at z>2 where Type Ia supernovae are unavailable. A clear technical strength is the importance-reweighting step that decouples light-curve fitting from cosmological sampling, rendering catalogue-scale analyses computationally feasible. The explicit use of closure tests on realistic cadence and noise properties, together with the acknowledgment of calibration degeneracies, provides a transparent validation of the numerical pipeline under the assumed generative model.

major comments (1)
  1. [Simulation and validation section] Simulation/validation section (end-to-end closure tests): the reported recovery of the variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, and distance-redshift parameters occurs exclusively when the injected data are drawn from the identical hierarchical population model and light-curve summary statistics used in the inference. While this confirms internal consistency and correct propagation of finite-baseline uncertainties, it leaves untested the effect of realistic deviations (e.g., redshift-dependent changes in the variability-luminosity slope or additional scatter from changing-look events). Because the central claim for cosmological utility rests on the stationarity and controlled scatter of the empirical anti-correlation, the absence of mismatch-injection tests makes the robustness claim load-bearing and in need of direct demonstration.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that finite-baseline light curves are 'more robustly summarized' by the chosen statistics, but the quantitative comparison (e.g., bias or scatter in recovered parameters) is not referenced to a specific table or figure; adding that cross-reference would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for the importance weights and the population-level hyperparameters is introduced without an explicit summary table; a compact table listing symbols, meanings, and priors would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the technical strengths of the importance-reweighting approach and the transparent validation strategy. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation and validation section] Simulation/validation section (end-to-end closure tests): the reported recovery of the variability-luminosity relation, intrinsic scatter, and distance-redshift parameters occurs exclusively when the injected data are drawn from the identical hierarchical population model and light-curve summary statistics used in the inference. While this confirms internal consistency and correct propagation of finite-baseline uncertainties, it leaves untested the effect of realistic deviations (e.g., redshift-dependent changes in the variability-luminosity slope or additional scatter from changing-look events). Because the central claim for cosmological utility rests on the stationarity and controlled scatter of the empirical anti-correlation, the absence of mismatch-injection tests makes the robustness claim load-bearing and in need of direct demonstration.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the reported closure tests recover parameters only when the injected data are generated from the identical model and summary statistics. This is the standard approach for validating the numerical pipeline, uncertainty propagation, and finite-baseline effects under the assumed generative process, as stated in the abstract and Section on simulations. The manuscript is framed as a proof-of-concept demonstration rather than a claim of robustness to arbitrary misspecification. We agree that mismatch-injection tests would be informative for assessing sensitivity to deviations such as redshift-dependent slope changes or changing-look events; however, defining realistic mismatch scenarios requires additional observational priors that are not yet established. We will revise the validation section and discussion to more explicitly delineate the scope of the current tests, restate the model assumptions required for cosmological use, and note that independent validation against real data will be needed in future applications. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; hierarchical model and closure tests are self-contained validation under stated assumptions.

full rationale

The paper defines a hierarchical Bayesian pipeline that takes the empirical variability-luminosity anti-correlation as an external input, fits light-curve summaries independently, then reweights under a population model. End-to-end closure tests inject parameters drawn from that same model into Gaia-like simulations and recover them; this is standard numerical validation of correct propagation, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction. No self-citations, self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the abstract or described framework. The central claim (proof-of-concept for moderate-baseline AGN distances) remains independent of the test results themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the empirical variability-luminosity anti-correlation as a standardizable observable and on standard Bayesian hierarchical modeling techniques; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • variability-luminosity relation parameters
    Parameters describing the anti-correlation, intrinsic scatter, and wavelength dependence are part of the population model and are fitted or marginalized during inference.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Type 1 AGN exhibit an empirical anti-correlation between optical/UV variability amplitude and luminosity that holds with controlled scatter and redshift dependence
    This relation is invoked as the basis for relating observed variability summaries to luminosity and thus to distance.
  • domain assumption Finite-baseline light curves can be adequately summarized by window-averaged brightness and short-lag variability for cosmological inference
    This modeling choice is used to avoid full stochastic-process fitting in the moderate-baseline regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5838 in / 1410 out tokens · 47664 ms · 2026-06-30T01:18:37.023306+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 58 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, and et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(Sept., 2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, G. S. Anand, L. Breuval, and et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,Astrophys. J. Lett.934(July, 2022) L7, [arXiv:2112.04510]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Abdul Karim, J

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, and et al.,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(Oct., 2025) 083515, [arXiv:2503.14738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Lodha, R

    K. Lodha, R. Calderon, W. L. Matthewson, A. Shafieloo, M. Ishak, J. Pan, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Huterer, G. Valogiannis, L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, and et al.,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,Phys. Rev. D112(Oct., 2025) 083511, [arXiv:2503.14743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle,Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy,JCAP 2024(Dec., 2024) 007, [arXiv:2404.08056]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle,On data set tensions and signatures of new cosmological physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531(June, 2024) L52–L56, [arXiv:2309.03286]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Jiang, D

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, and S. Vagnozzi,Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data,Phys. Rev. D110(Dec., 2024) 123519, [arXiv:2408.02365]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Efstathiou,Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle,Mon

    G. Efstathiou,Baryon acoustic oscillations from a different angle,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.540(July, 2025) 2844–2852, [arXiv:2505.02658]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Efstathiou,Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?,Mon

    G. Efstathiou,Evolving dark energy or supernovae systematics?,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 538(Apr., 2025) 875–882, [arXiv:2408.07175]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    D. D. Y. Ong, D. Yallup, and W. Handley,The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,arXiv e-prints(Mar., 2026) arXiv:2603.05472, [arXiv:2603.05472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Brout, D

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A. G. Riess, A. Carr, J. Zuntz, R. Kessler, T. M. Davis, S. Hinton, D. Jones, and et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints, Astrophys. J.938(Oct., 2022) 110, [arXiv:2202.04077]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Scolnic, D

    D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A. G. Riess, T. M. Davis, A. Dwomoh, D. O. Jones, N. Ali, P. Charvu, R. Chen, and et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release,Astrophys. J.938(Oct., 2022) 113, [arXiv:2112.03863]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    B. W. Lyke, A. N. Higley, J. N. McLane, D. P. Schurhammer, A. D. Myers, A. J. Ross, K. Dawson, S. Chabanier, P. Martini, N. G. Busca, and et al.,The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: Sixteenth Data Release,Astrophys. J. Suppl.250(Sept., 2020) 8, [arXiv:2007.09001]

    arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Wu and Y

    Q. Wu and Y. Shen,A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16,Astrophys. J. Suppl.263(Dec., 2022) 42, [arXiv:2209.03987]

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Vallenari, A

    Gaia Collaboration, A. Vallenari, A. G. A. Brown, T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, F. Arenou, C. Babusiaux, M. Biermann, O. L. Creevey, C. Ducourant, and et al.,Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties,Astron. Astrophys.674(June, 2023) A1, [arXiv:2208.00211]

    arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    L. Eyer, M. Audard, B. Holl, L. Rimoldini, M. I. Carnerero, G. Clementini, J. De Ridder, E. Distefano, D. W. Evans, P. Gavras, and et al.,Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the variability processing and analysis,Astron. Astrophys.674(June, 2023) A13, [arXiv:2206.06416]

    arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Risaliti and E

    G. Risaliti and E. Lusso,A Hubble Diagram for Quasars,Astrophys. J.815(Dec., 2015) 33, [arXiv:1505.07118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Risaliti and E

    G. Risaliti and E. Lusso,Cosmological Constraints from the Hubble Diagram of Quasars at High Redshifts,Nature Astronomy3(Jan., 2019) 272–277, [arXiv:1811.02590]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Lusso, G

    E. Lusso, G. Risaliti, E. Nardini, G. Bargiacchi, M. Benetti, S. Bisogni, S. Capozziello, F. Civano, L. Eggleston, M. Elvis, and et al.,Quasars as standard candles. III. Validation of a new sample for cosmological studies,Astron. Astrophys.642(Oct., 2020) A150, [arXiv:2008.08586]

    arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Lusso, G

    E. Lusso, G. Risaliti, and E. Nardini,Are quasars reliable standard candles?,Astron. Astrophys.697(May, 2025) A108, [arXiv:2504.02040]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Lusso and G

    E. Lusso and G. Risaliti,Quasars as standard candles. I. The physical relation between disc and coronal emission,Astron. Astrophys.602(June, 2017) A79, [arXiv:1703.05299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Y. Tu, N. Chang, F. F. Song, F. He, and X. Y. Fu,Cosmological constraints from type-I radio-loud quasars,Phys. Rev. D109(Feb., 2024) 043529, [arXiv:2307.07592]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Huang, H

    L. Huang, H. Wang, Z. Gao, X. Zeng, and Z. Chang,A measure of cosmological distance using the C IV Baldwin effect in quasars,Astron. Astrophys.674(June, 2023) A163, [arXiv:2207.09456]

    arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    I. M. Hook, R. G. McMahon, B. J. Boyle, and M. J. Irwin,The variability of optically selected quasars.,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.268(May, 1994) 305–320

    1994

  25. [25]

    D. E. Vanden Berk, B. C. Wilhite, R. G. Kron, S. F. Anderson, R. J. Brunner, P. B. Hall, ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, G. T. Richards, D. P. Schneider, D. G. York, and et al.,The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ˜25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,Astrophys. J.601(Feb., 2004) 692–714, [astro-ph/0310336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    B. C. Kelly, J. Bechtold, and A. Siemiginowska,Are the variations in quasar optical flux driven by thermal fluctuations?,The Astrophysical Journal698(2009), no. 1 895–910, [arXiv:0903.5315]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    C. L. MacLeod, ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, C. S. Kochanek, S. Koz lowski, B. Kelly, E. Bullock, A. Kimball, B. Sesar, D. Westman, K. Brooks, and et al.,Modeling the Time Variability of SDSS Stripe 82 Quasars as a Damped Random Walk,Astrophys. J.721(Oct., 2010) 1014–1033, [arXiv:1004.0276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    C. L. MacLeod, ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, B. Sesar, W. de Vries, C. S. Kochanek, B. C. Kelly, A. C. Becker, R. H. Lupton, P. B. Hall, G. T. Richards, and et al.,A Description of Quasar Variability Measured Using Repeated SDSS and POSS Imaging,Astrophys. J.753(July, 2012) 106, [arXiv:1112.0679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Caplar, S

    N. Caplar, S. J. Lilly, and B. Trakhtenbrot,Optical Variability of AGNs in the PTF/iPTF Survey,Astrophys. J.834(Jan., 2017) 111, [arXiv:1611.03082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    K. L. Suberlak, ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, and C. MacLeod,Improving Damped Random Walk Parameters for SDSS Stripe 82 Quasars with Pan-STARRS1,Astrophys. J.907(Feb., 2021) 96, [arXiv:2012.12907]

    arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Ar´ evalo, P

    P. Ar´ evalo, P. Lira, P. S´ anchez-S´ aez, P. Patel, E. L´ opez-Navas, E. Churazov, and L. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa,Optical variability in quasars: scalings with black hole mass and Eddington ratio depend on the observed time-scales,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society526(2023), no. 4 6078–6087, [arXiv:2304.14228]

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Dutra, C

    I. Dutra, C. J. Burke, P. Natarajan, and W. Yu,Evidence for evolving dark energy from a new cosmic probe,arXiv e-prints(Dec., 2025) arXiv:2512.07931, [arXiv:2512.07931]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    W. Yu, G. T. Richards, J. J. Ruan, M. S. Vogeley, F. E. Bauer, and M. J. Graham, Examining Active Galactic Nucleus UV/Optical Variability beyond the Simple Damped Random Walk. II. Insights from 22 yr Observations of SDSS, PS1, and ZTF,The Astrophysical Journal992(2025), no. 1 130, [arXiv:2508.12076]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Koz lowski,Limitations on the recovery of the true AGN variability parameters using – 36 – damped random walk modeling,Astron

    S. Koz lowski,Limitations on the recovery of the true AGN variability parameters using – 36 – damped random walk modeling,Astron. Astrophys.597(Jan., 2017) A128, [arXiv:1611.08248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Hu, Z.-Y

    X.-F. Hu, Z.-Y. Cai, and J.-X. Wang,How can the optical variation properties of active galactic nuclei be unbiasedly measured?,The Astrophysical Journal961(2024), no. 1 5, [arXiv:2310.16223]

    arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    W. H. de Vries, R. H. Becker, R. L. White, and C. Loomis,Structure Function Analysis of Long-Term Quasar Variability,Astron. J.129(Feb., 2005) 615–629, [astro-ph/0411348]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    K. B. Schmidt, P. J. Marshall, H.-W. Rix, S. Jester, J. F. Hennawi, and G. Dobler,Selecting Quasars by Their Intrinsic Variability,Astrophys. J.714(May, 2010) 1194–1208, [arXiv:1002.2642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Koz lowski,Revisiting Stochastic Variability of AGNs with Structure Functions,Astrophys

    S. Koz lowski,Revisiting Stochastic Variability of AGNs with Structure Functions,Astrophys. J.826(Aug., 2016) 118, [arXiv:1604.05858]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    B. C. Wilhite, R. J. Brunner, C. J. Grier, D. P. Schneider, and D. E. Vanden Berk,On the variability of quasars: a link between the Eddington ratio and optical variability?,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society383(2008), no. 3 1232–1240, [arXiv:0711.4844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Morganson, W

    E. Morganson, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, P. J. Green, N. Kaiser, E. A. Magnier, P. J. Marshall, J. S. Morgan, P. A. Price, H.-W. Rix, and et al.,Measuring Quasar Variability with Pan-STARRS1 and SDSS,Astrophys. J.784(Apr., 2014) 92, [arXiv:1407.0716]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Z. Li, I. D. McGreer, X.-B. Wu, X. Fan, and Q. Yang,The Ensemble Photometric Variability of Over 10 5 Quasars in the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,Astrophys. J.861(July, 2018) 6, [arXiv:1805.07747]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    A. B. Kovaˇ cevi´ c, D. Ili´ c, L.ˇC. Popovi´ c, V. Radovi´ c, I. Jankov, I. Yoon, N. Caplar, I. ˇCvorovi´ c-Hajdinjak, and S. Simi´ c,On possible proxies of AGN light-curves cadence selection in future time domain surveys,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(Aug., 2021) 5012–5028, [arXiv:2105.14889]

    arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Stone, Y

    Z. Stone, Y. Shen, C. J. Burke, Y.-C. Chen, Q. Yang, X. Liu, R. A. Gruendl, M. Adam´ ow, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, and et al.,Correction to: Optical variability of quasars with 20-year photometric light curves,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521(May, 2023) 836–839

    2023

  44. [44]

    B. C. Kelly, A. C. Becker, M. Sobolewska, A. Siemiginowska, and P. Uttley,Flexible and Scalable Methods for Quantifying Stochastic Variability in the Era of Massive Time-domain Astronomical Data Sets,The Astrophysical Journal788(2014), no. 1 33, [arXiv:1402.5978]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Y. Zu, C. S. Kochanek, S. Koz lowski, and A. Udalski,Is Quasar Optical Variability a Damped Random Walk?,Astrophys. J.765(Mar., 2013) 106, [arXiv:1202.3783]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    Koz lowski, C

    S. Koz lowski, C. S. Kochanek, A. Udalski, L. Wyrzykowski, I. Soszy´ nski, M. K. Szyma´ nski, M. Kubiak, G. Pietrzy´ nski, O. Szewczyk, K. Ulaczyk, and et al.,Quantifying Quasar Variability as Part of a General Approach to Classifying Continuously Varying Sources, Astrophys. J.708(Jan., 2010) 927–945, [arXiv:0909.1326]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    R. F. Mushotzky, R. Edelson, W. Baumgartner, and P. Gandhi,Kepler observations of rapid optical variability in active galactic nuclei,The Astrophysical Journal Letters743(2011), no. 1 L12, [arXiv:1111.0672]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    V. P. Kasliwal, M. S. Vogeley, and G. T. Richards,Are the variability properties of the Kepler AGN light curves consistent with a damped random walk?,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society451(2015), no. 4 4328–4345, [arXiv:1505.00360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Zhu, J.-X

    F.-F. Zhu, J.-X. Wang, Z.-Y. Cai, and Y.-H. Sun,The Timescale-dependent Color Variability of Quasars Viewed with GALEX,The Astrophysical Journal832(2016), no. 1 75, [arXiv:1609.07136]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    W. Yu, G. T. Richards, M. S. Vogeley, J. Moreno, and M. J. Graham,Examining AGN UV/Optical Variability beyond the Simple Damped Random Walk,The Astrophysical Journal 936(2022), no. 2 132, [arXiv:2201.08943]

    arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Koz lowski,A survey length for agn variability studies,Acta Astronomica71(2021), no

    S. Koz lowski,A survey length for agn variability studies,Acta Astronomica71(2021), no. 2 103–112, [arXiv:2109.03896]

    arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev,Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance., Astron. Astrophys.24(Jan., 1973) 337–355

    1973

  53. [53]

    J. H. Krolik, K. Horne, T. R. Kallman, M. A. Malkan, R. A. Edelson, and G. A. Kriss, Ultraviolet Variability of NGC 5548: Dynamics of the Continuum Production Region and Geometry of the Broad-Line Region,Astrophys. J.371(Apr., 1991) 541

    1991

  54. [54]

    E. M. Cackett, K. Horne, and H. Winkler,Testing thermal reprocessing in active galactic nuclei accretion discs,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.380(Sept., 2007) 669–682, [arXiv:0706.1464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    E. M. Cackett, M. C. Bentz, and E. Kara,Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei: from X-ray corona to dusty torus,iScience24(June, 2021) 102557, [arXiv:2105.06926]

    arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Kubota and C

    A. Kubota and C. Done,A physical model of the broad-band continuum of AGN and its implications for the UV/X relation and optical variability,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480 (Oct., 2018) 1247–1262, [arXiv:1804.00171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Hagen, C

    S. Hagen, C. Done, and R. Edelson,What drives the variability in AGN? explaining the UV–X-ray disconnect through propagating fluctuations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society530(2024), no. 4 4850–4867, [arXiv:2401.03452]

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    S´ anchez-S´ aez, P

    P. S´ anchez-S´ aez, P. Lira, J. Mej´ ıa-Restrepo, L. C. Ho, P. Ar´ evalo, M. Kim, R. Cartier, and P. Coppi,The QUEST-La Silla AGN Variability Survey: Connection between AGN Variability and Black Hole Physical Properties,Astrophys. J.864(Sept., 2018) 87, [arXiv:1808.00967]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Patel, P

    P. Patel, P. Lira, P. Ar´ evalo, M. Sun, S. Bernal, and M. L. Mart´ ınez-Aldama,Probing the rest-frame wavelength dependence of quasar variability: Insights from the Zwicky Transient Facility Survey,Astron. Astrophys.695(Mar., 2025) A162, [arXiv:2409.14999]

    arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    H. B. Gon¸ calves, S. Panda, T. Storchi-Bergmann, E. M. Cackett, and M. Eracleous,Exploring quasar variability with ztf at0< z <3: A universal relation with eddington ratio, arXiv:2505.09779

    arXiv

  61. [61]

    C. J. Burke, Y. Shen, O. Blaes, C. F. Gammie, K. Horne, Y.-F. Jiang, X. Liu, I. M. McHardy, C. W. Morgan, S. Scaringi, and Q. Yang,A characteristic optical variability time scale in astrophysical accretion disks,Science373(2021), no. 6556 789–792, [arXiv:2108.05389]

    arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Vestergaard and B

    M. Vestergaard and B. M. Peterson,Determining Central Black Hole Masses in Distant Active Galaxies and Quasars. II. Improved Optical and UV Scaling Relationships,Astrophys. J.641(Apr., 2006) 689–709, [astro-ph/0601303]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  63. [63]

    Shen and B

    Y. Shen and B. C. Kelly,The Impact of the Uncertainty in Single-epoch Virial Black Hole Mass Estimates on the Observed Evolution of the Black Hole-bulge Scaling Relations, Astrophys. J.713(Apr., 2010) 41–45, [arXiv:0911.5208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Shen,The mass of quasars,Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India41(Mar., 2013) 61–115, [arXiv:1302.2643]

    Y. Shen,The mass of quasars,Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India41(Mar., 2013) 61–115, [arXiv:1302.2643]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    J. C. Runnoe, M. S. Brotherton, and Z. Shang,Updating quasar bolometric luminosity corrections,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.422(May, 2012) 478–493, [arXiv:1201.5155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    C. M. Krawczyk, G. T. Richards, S. S. Mehta, M. S. Vogeley, S. C. Gallagher, K. M. Leighly, N. P. Ross, and D. P. Schneider,Mean Spectral Energy Distributions and Bolometric Corrections for Luminous Quasars,Astrophys. J. Suppl.206(May, 2013) 4, [arXiv:1304.5573]. – 38 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    J. Aird, A. L. Coil, A. Georgakakis, K. Nandra, G. Barro, and P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez,The evolution of the x-ray luminosity functions of unabsorbed and absorbed agns out to z∼5, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society451(2015), no. 2 1892–1927, [arXiv:1503.01120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Kulkarni, G

    G. Kulkarni, G. Worseck, and J. F. Hennawi,Evolution of the agn uv luminosity function from redshift 7.5,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society488(2019), no. 1 1035–1065, [arXiv:1807.09774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    X. Shen, P. F. Hopkins, C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere, D. M. Alexander, G. T. Richards, N. P. Ross, and R. C. Hickox,The bolometric quasar luminosity function at z = 0–7,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society495(2020), no. 3 3252–3275, [arXiv:2001.02696]

    arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    B. C. Kelly,Some aspects of measurement error in linear regression of astronomical data,The Astrophysical Journal665(2007), no. 2 1489–1506, [arXiv:0705.2774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [71]

    M. C. March, R. C. Wolf, m. Sako, C. D’Andrea, and D. Brout,A Bayesian approach to truncated data sets: An application to Malmquist bias in Supernova Cosmology,arXiv e-prints (Apr., 2018) arXiv:1804.02474, [arXiv:1804.02474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    A. B. Mantz,Coping with selection effects: A primer on regression with truncated data, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society485(2019), no. 4 4863–4872, [arXiv:1901.10522]

    arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Mandel, W

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair,Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society486(2019), no. 1 1086–1093, [arXiv:1809.02063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, D. Hatt, T. J. Hoyt, I. S. Jang, R. L. Beaton, C. R. Burns, M. G. Lee, A. J. Monson, J. R. Neeley, and et al.,The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,Astrophys. J.882(Sept., 2019) 34, [arXiv:1907.05922]

    arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Foreman-Mackey, E

    D. Foreman-Mackey, E. Agol, S. Ambikasaran, and R. Angus,Fast and Scalable Gaussian Process Modeling with Applications to Astronomical Time Series,Astron. J.154(Dec., 2017) 220, [arXiv:1703.09710]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Goodman and J

    J. Goodman and J. Weare,Ensemble samplers with affine invariance,Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science5(Jan., 2010) 65–80

    2010

  77. [77]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman,emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125(Mar., 2013) 306, [arXiv:1202.3665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    JAX: Autograd and XLA

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and et al., “JAX: Autograd and XLA.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2111.002, Nov., 2021

    2021

  79. [79]

    D. Phan, N. Pradhan, and M. Jankowiak,Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro,arXiv e-prints(Dec., 2019) arXiv:1912.11554, [arXiv:1912.11554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    M. D. Hoffman and A. Gelman,The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo,arXiv e-prints(Nov., 2011) arXiv:1111.4246, [arXiv:1111.4246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.