pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29698 · v1 · pith:RATNW57Lnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

Clear Mind: Meditation and the Brain's Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Ruben Laukkonen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords meditationsignal-to-noise ratiof-SNRbraincritical regimeneural variabilitypsychopathologybrain-computer interface
0
0 comments X

The pith

Meditation improves brain function by raising the ratio of goal-relevant neural signals to irrelevant noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that many observed effects of meditation can be explained by a single mechanism: an increase in the brain's functional signal-to-noise ratio. Signal refers to neural activity that tracks goal-relevant aspects of the world, while noise covers leftover fluctuations that do not. Meditation is said to raise this ratio first by sharpening the signal and removing clutter, then, with deeper practice, by cutting self-referential filtering and moving overall brain activity into a critical state that carries more information. The account also links low signal-to-noise states to several mental health conditions and suggests meditation could make brain signals easier for machines to read.

Core claim

Diverse findings on meditation map onto functional signal-to-noise ratio in the brain. Meditation increases this ratio by selectively enhancing signal and decluttering noise. Deeper practice further raises it by reducing self-referential filtering and shifting global neural activity toward a critical regime that maximizes information transmission and dynamic range. The framework is supported by existing evidence and can be tested with metrics such as neural variability quenching, mutual information, and multivariate decoding. It also provides a transdiagnostic account for meditation's benefits in psychopathologies tied to low-SNR states and suggests applications for brain-computer interfaces

What carries the argument

Functional signal-to-noise ratio (f-SNR), the ratio of neural variance tracking goal-relevant sensory causes to residual endogenous activity, which meditation is proposed to increase through signal enhancement, noise reduction, and critical-regime shifts.

If this is right

  • Meditation raises f-SNR by enhancing goal-relevant signals and removing irrelevant fluctuations.
  • Deeper practice further increases f-SNR by lowering self-referential filtering.
  • Global neural activity moves toward a critical regime that improves information transmission.
  • Low f-SNR states help explain why meditation aids multiple forms of psychopathology.
  • Meditation can make brain activity more readable for brain-computer interfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • New meditation training could be designed around measurable SNR targets rather than subjective reports alone.
  • Individual differences in baseline SNR might predict who benefits most from meditation practice.
  • Neurofeedback tools could be tested to see whether they accelerate the SNR gains described in the framework.

Load-bearing premise

Neural activity can be partitioned into goal-relevant signal versus residual noise in a manner that directly accounts for the effects of meditation.

What would settle it

Recordings showing that meditation fails to increase mutual information or neural variability quenching while participants report clearer minds would challenge the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29698 by Ruben Laukkonen.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: How mindfulness trains adaptive and selective engagement of hierarchical processing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Bodily posture as an embodied sensorimotor error-correction loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Meditation is quintessentially associated with a clear mind. This paper proposes that diverse findings in the science of meditation can be mapped onto a single, empirically tractable construct: functional signal-to-noise ratio in the brain, or f-SNR. Signal denotes neural variance that tracks the goal-relevant causes of sensory input, while noise denotes residual activity, including irrelevant endogenous fluctuations. Mechanistically, meditation increases f-SNR through two primary operations: selectively enhancing signal and "decluttering" noise. Deepening practice is further proposed to increase f-SNR by reducing self-referential filtering and shifting global neural activity toward a critical regime, a thermodynamically efficient state that maximizes information transmission and dynamic range. This framework has a strong existing evidence base and is readily falsifiable using metrics such as neural variability quenching, mutual information, and multivariate decoding. The f-SNR account also offers a transdiagnostic explanation for the efficacy of meditation across a range of psychopathologies associated with low-SNR states. The theory also has implications for emerging technology: meditation may improve brain-computer interfaces, or BCIs, by making brain activity easier to read.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that effects of meditation can be unified under a single construct, functional signal-to-noise ratio (f-SNR), defined with signal as neural variance tracking goal-relevant causes of sensory input and noise as residual activity. Meditation is claimed to increase f-SNR via selective signal enhancement and noise decluttering; deeper practice further increases f-SNR by reducing self-referential filtering and shifting global activity toward a critical regime. The framework is asserted to rest on a strong existing evidence base, to be falsifiable with metrics such as variability quenching, mutual information, and multivariate decoding, and to explain meditation efficacy across psychopathologies while offering implications for brain-computer interfaces.

Significance. If the proposed mappings can be made operational and tested without circularity, the f-SNR account could provide a parsimonious, information-theoretic lens for organizing meditation findings and linking them to criticality and transdiagnostic mechanisms. It would also generate concrete predictions for BCI performance and clinical applications. At present the manuscript offers only a conceptual proposal without new derivations, data, or detailed empirical mappings, so its significance remains prospective and dependent on subsequent validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the partitioning of neural activity into 'signal' (variance tracking goal-relevant causes) versus 'noise' (residual activity) is introduced without independent operational criteria or external benchmarks; because the definitions are framed directly in terms of the meditation effects they are meant to explain, the central claim that f-SNR is 'empirically tractable' and 'readily falsifiable' rests on a potentially circular construct that requires explicit disambiguation before the framework can be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'strong existing evidence base' is stated without any specific citations, mappings, or examples of how particular meditation findings (e.g., variability quenching or decoding improvements) translate into measurable f-SNR changes; this absence is load-bearing for the claim that the framework unifies diverse results and is falsifiable with existing tools.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript should include a dedicated section that explicitly maps at least two or three published meditation findings onto concrete f-SNR metrics (e.g., mutual information or decoding accuracy) to illustrate the proposed unification.
  2. Notation for f-SNR and the critical regime should be defined more formally, perhaps with a simple schematic or equation, to distinguish the proposal from prior SNR concepts in systems neuroscience.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our conceptual framework. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to strengthen the manuscript's clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the partitioning of neural activity into 'signal' (variance tracking goal-relevant causes) versus 'noise' (residual activity) is introduced without independent operational criteria or external benchmarks; because the definitions are framed directly in terms of the meditation effects they are meant to explain, the central claim that f-SNR is 'empirically tractable' and 'readily falsifiable' rests on a potentially circular construct that requires explicit disambiguation before the framework can be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit disambiguation to prevent any appearance of circularity. The definitions of signal (neural variance covarying with goal-relevant sensory causes) and noise (residual activity) are drawn from standard signal-detection and information-theoretic approaches in neuroscience, where signal is identified via its statistical relationship to external variables (e.g., stimulus properties or task goals) independent of any intervention. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract and added a dedicated paragraph in the introduction that specifies independent operational criteria, including the use of encoding/decoding models and regression-based partitioning of variance, which can be applied in any task-based paradigm. This permits direct falsification via metrics such as variability quenching or mutual information without presupposing meditation effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'strong existing evidence base' is stated without any specific citations, mappings, or examples of how particular meditation findings (e.g., variability quenching or decoding improvements) translate into measurable f-SNR changes; this absence is load-bearing for the claim that the framework unifies diverse results and is falsifiable with existing tools.

    Authors: The abstract is space-limited and therefore omits detailed citations, but the full manuscript references supporting studies. To make the unification and falsifiability claims more concrete, the revised version now includes explicit mappings with citations: for example, meditation-related reductions in trial-to-trial variability (variability quenching) are mapped to noise decluttering, and improvements in multivariate pattern decoding of perceptual content are mapped to signal enhancement. These examples are tied to specific metrics (e.g., BOLD variability, decoding accuracy) that can be measured pre- and post-meditation, thereby grounding the evidence base and falsifiability assertions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper advances a conceptual mapping of meditation effects onto an explicitly defined f-SNR construct (signal as goal-relevant neural variance, noise as residual activity) rather than any derivation, equation, or first-principles prediction. The mechanisms are stated in terms of the definitions themselves, but this is presented as an interpretive hypothesis with an external evidence base and falsifiability via independent metrics (variability quenching, mutual information, decoding). No load-bearing self-citation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs occurs. The framework is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on interpretive definitions of neural signal and noise plus the assumption that these map directly to meditation mechanisms, introducing f-SNR as a new unifying entity without independent evidence or free parameters specified in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neural variance can be partitioned into goal-relevant signal and residual noise
    Core definition of f-SNR stated in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Meditation increases f-SNR through signal enhancement and noise decluttering
    Proposed as primary operations without derivation or justification in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • f-SNR (functional signal-to-noise ratio) no independent evidence
    purpose: Single empirically tractable construct unifying diverse meditation findings
    Newly proposed in the paper as the central mapping target.
  • critical regime of global neural activity no independent evidence
    purpose: Thermodynamically efficient state that maximizes information transmission for deepening practice
    Invoked as a mechanism without independent evidence in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1555 out tokens · 66978 ms · 2026-06-30T04:22:04.232154+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Touching Peace: Practicing the Art of Mindful Living

    Thich Nhat Hanh. Touching Peace: Practicing the Art of Mindful Living. Ed. by Kotler A. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press, 1992

    1992

  2. [2]

    Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation

    Van Dam NT, Vugt MK van, Vago DR, Schmalzl L, Saron CD, Olendzki A, Meissner T, Lazar SW, Kerr CE, Gorchov J, Fox KCR, Field BA, Britton WB, Brefczynski-Lewis JA, and Meyer DE. Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 36-61. 2018.doi: 10.1177/1745...

    work page doi:10.1177/1745691617709589 2018

  3. [3]

    The Third Wave of Meditation and Mindfulness Research and Implications for Challenging Experiences: Negative Effects, Transformative Psychological Growth, and Forms of Happiness

    Sparby T and Sacchet MD. The Third Wave of Meditation and Mindfulness Research and Implications for Challenging Experiences: Negative Effects, Transformative Psychological Growth, and Forms of Happiness. Mindfulness, 16(8), 2156-2170. 2025.doi:10.1007/s12671- 025-02607-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12671- 2025

  4. [4]

    Mindfulness, cognition, and long-term meditators: Toward a science of advanced meditation

    Ehmann S, Sezer I, Treves IN, Gabrieli JDE, and Sacchet MD. Mindfulness, cognition, and long-term meditators: Toward a science of advanced meditation. Imaging Neuroscience, 3, Article IMAG.a.82. 2025.doi:10.1162/imag.a.82

    work page doi:10.1162/imag.a.82 2025

  5. [5]

    Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life

    Kabat-Zinn J. Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion. 1994

    1994

  6. [6]

    The elephant and the blind: The experience of pure consciousness: Philosophy, science, and 500+ experiential reports

    Metzinger T. The elephant and the blind: The experience of pure consciousness: Philosophy, science, and 500+ experiential reports. The MIT Press. 2024.doi:10.7551/mitpress/15196. 001.0001

    work page doi:10.7551/mitpress/15196 2024

  7. [7]

    Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness

    Dunne J. Toward an understanding of non-dual mindfulness. In J. M. G. Williams & J. Kabat-Zinn (Eds.), Mindfulness: Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins and applications (pp. 71-88). Routledge. 2013.doi:10.4324/9781315874586

    work page doi:10.4324/9781315874586 2013

  8. [8]

    Volitional mental absorption in meditation: Toward a scientific understanding of advanced concentrative absorption meditation and the case of jhana

    Yang WFZ, Sparby T, Wright M, Kim E, and Sacchet MD. Volitional mental absorption in meditation: Toward a scientific understanding of advanced concentrative absorption meditation and the case of jhana. Heliyon, 10(10), e31223. 2024.doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31223

    work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31223 2024

  9. [9]

    The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?,

    Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138. 2010.doi:10.1038/nrn2787

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn2787 2010

  10. [10]

    Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition

    Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D, and Devins G. Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. 2004.doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077

    work page doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 2004

  11. [11]

    Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice

    Dahl CJ, Lutz A, and Davidson RJ. Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 515-523. 2015.doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.001 2015

  12. [13]

    Meditation induces shifts in neural oscillations, brain complexity, and critical dynamics: novel insights from MEG

    Pascarella A, Thölke P, Meunier D, O’Byrne J, Lajnef T, Raffone A, Guidotti R, Pizzella V, Marzetti L, and Jerbi K. Meditation induces shifts in neural oscillations, brain complexity, and critical dynamics: novel insights from MEG. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2025(1), Article niaf047. 2025.doi:10.1093/nc/niaf047 16

    work page doi:10.1093/nc/niaf047 2025

  13. [14]

    Meditative absorption shifts brain dynamics toward criticality

    Mago J, Brahinsky J, Miller M, Maschke C, Slagter HA, Catherine S, Laukkonen RE, Cahn BR, Sacchet MD, Dixey W, Dixey R, Rej S, and Lifshitz M. Meditative absorption shifts brain dynamics toward criticality. arXiv. 2025.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.20990

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.20990 2025

  14. [15]

    Whole-brain models of minimal phenomenal experience: Approaching criticality through Jhana meditation

    Vohryzek J, Lopez-Sola E, Yang WFZ, Sanz Perl Y, Sparby T, Ruffini G, Deco G, and Sacchet MD. Whole-brain models of minimal phenomenal experience: Approaching criticality through Jhana meditation. bioRxiv. 2025.doi:10.1101/2025.09.25.678574

    work page doi:10.1101/2025.09.25.678574 2025

  15. [16]

    Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition

    Cocchi L, Gollo LL, Zalesky A, and Breakspear M. Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition. Progress in Neurobiology, 158, 132-152. 2017.doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.002 2017

  16. [17]

    Rethinking Rumination

    Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, and Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking Rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400-424. 2008.doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x 2008

  17. [18]

    Goal-directed learning and obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Gillan CM and Robbins TW. Goal-directed learning and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1655), 20130475. 2014. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0475

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0475 2014

  18. [19]

    Psychosis as a State of Aberrant Salience: A Framework Linking Biology, Phe- nomenology, and Pharmacology in Schizophrenia

    Kapur S. Psychosis as a State of Aberrant Salience: A Framework Linking Biology, Phe- nomenology, and Pharmacology in Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 13-23. 2003.doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13

    work page doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 2003

  19. [20]

    The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis

    Sterzer P, Adams RA, Fletcher P, Frith C, Lawrie SM, Muckli L, Petrovic P, Uhlhaas P, Voss M, and Corlett PR. The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 84(9), 634-643. 2018.doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015 2018

  20. [21]

    An Automated Method for Quality Control in MRI Systems: Methods and Considerations

    Epistatou AC, Tsalafoutas IA, and Delibasis KK. An Automated Method for Quality Control in MRI Systems: Methods and Considerations. Journal of Imaging, 6(10), 111. 2020.doi: 10.3390/jimaging6100111

    work page doi:10.3390/jimaging6100111 2020

  21. [22]

    On the Definition of Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio for fMRI Data

    Welvaert M and Rosseel Y. On the Definition of Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio for fMRI Data. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e77089. 2013.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077089

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077089 2013

  22. [23]

    Bootstrap Signal-to-Noise Confidence Intervals: An Objective Method for Subject Exclusion and Quality Control in ERP Studies

    Parks NA, Gannon MA, Long SM, and Young ME. Bootstrap Signal-to-Noise Confidence Intervals: An Objective Method for Subject Exclusion and Quality Control in ERP Studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 50. 2016.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00050

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00050 2016

  23. [24]

    Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing

    Gonzalez-Moreno A, Aurtenetxe S, Lopez-Garcia ME, Pozo F del, Maestu F, and Nevado A. Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 56-61. 2014.doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.019 2014

  24. [25]

    Predictive coding under the free-energy principle

    Friston K and Kiebel S. Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211-1221. 2009.doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0300

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0300 2009

  25. [26]

    Active inference and epistemic value

    Friston K, Rigoli F, Ognibene D, Mathys C, Fitzgerald T, and Pezzulo G. Active inference and epistemic value. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(4), 187-214. 2015.doi:10.1080/17588928. 2015.1020053

    work page doi:10.1080/17588928 2015

  26. [27]

    Information theory and neural coding

    Borst A and Theunissen FE. Information theory and neural coding. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 947-957. 1999.doi:10.1038/14731

    work page doi:10.1038/14731 1999

  27. [28]

    Identification of Multiple Noise Sources Improves Esti- mation of Neural Responses across Stimulus Conditions

    Weber AI, Shea-Brown E, and Rieke F. Identification of Multiple Noise Sources Improves Esti- mation of Neural Responses across Stimulus Conditions. eNeuro, 8(4), Article ENEURO.0191- 21.2021. 2021.doi:10.1523/eneuro.0191-21.2021 17

    work page doi:10.1523/eneuro.0191-21.2021 2021

  28. [29]

    Long-term stability of cortical population dynamics underlying consistent behavior

    Gallego JA, Perich MG, Chowdhury RH, Solla SA, and Miller LE. Long-term stability of cortical population dynamics underlying consistent behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 23(2), 260-270. 2020.doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0555-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0555-4 2020

  29. [30]

    Learning in a sensory cortical microstimulation task is associated with elevated representational stability

    Pancholi R, Ryan L, and Peron S. Learning in a sensory cortical microstimulation task is associated with elevated representational stability. Nature Communications, 14(1), Article

  30. [31]

    2023.doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39542-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39542-x 2023

  31. [32]

    Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes

    Lycke R, Kim R, Zolotavin P, Montes J, Sun Y, Koszeghy A, Altun E, Noble B, Yin R, He F, Totah N, Xie C, and Luan L. Low-threshold, high-resolution, chronically stable intracortical microstimulation by ultraflexible electrodes. Cell Reports, 42(6), 112554. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112554

    work page doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112554 2023

  32. [33]

    Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future

    Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. 2003.doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg016

    work page doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg016 2003

  33. [34]

    Mindfulness Interventions

    Creswell JD. Mindfulness Interventions. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 491-516. 2017. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 2017

  34. [35]

    Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex

    Felleman DJ and Van Essen DC. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1(1), 1–47. 1991.doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a

    work page doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a 1991

  35. [36]

    Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex

    Yamins DLK and DiCarlo JJ. Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 19(3), 356–365. 2016.doi:10.1038/nn.4244

    work page doi:10.1038/nn.4244 2016

  36. [37]

    Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and Ageing, 35(suppl_2), ii7–ii11

    Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and Ageing, 35(suppl_2), ii7–ii11. 2006.doi:10. 1093/ageing/afl077

    2006

  37. [38]

    Sensorimotor integration in human postural control

    Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(3), 1097–1118. 2002.doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097

    work page doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097 2002

  38. [39]

    The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force

    Proske U and Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiological Reviews, 92(4), 1651–1697. 2012.doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011

    work page doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 2012

  39. [40]

    Vestibular system: The many facets of a multimodal sense

    Angelaki DE and Cullen KE. Vestibular system: The many facets of a multimodal sense. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 125–150. 2008.doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125555

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125555 2008

  40. [41]

    Uncovering a stability signature of brain dynamics associated with meditation experience using massive time-series feature extraction

    Bailey NW, Fulcher BD, Caldwell B, Hill AT, Fitzgibbon B, Dijk H van, and Fitzgerald PB. Uncovering a stability signature of brain dynamics associated with meditation experience using massive time-series feature extraction. Neural Networks, 171, 171-185. 2024.doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.12.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.12.007 2024

  41. [42]

    Mental Training Enhances Attentional Stability: Neural and Behavioral Evidence

    Lutz A, Slagter HA, Rawlings NB, Francis AD, Greischar LL, and Davidson RJ. Mental Training Enhances Attentional Stability: Neural and Behavioral Evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(42), 13418-13427. 2009.doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1614-09.2009

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1614-09.2009 2009

  42. [43]

    Mental Training Affects Distribution of Limited Brain Resources

    Slagter HA, Lutz A, Greischar LL, Francis AD, Nieuwenhuis S, Davis JM, and Davidson RJ. Mental Training Affects Distribution of Limited Brain Resources. PLoS Biology, 5(6), e138. 2007.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050138

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050138 2007

  43. [44]

    Regular, brief mindfulness meditation practice improves electrophysiological markers of attentional control

    Moore A, Gruber T, Derose J, and Malinowski P. Regular, brief mindfulness meditation practice improves electrophysiological markers of attentional control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 18. 2012.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00018 18

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00018 2012

  44. [45]

    Mindful breath awareness meditation facilitates efficiency gains in brain networks: A steady-state visually evoked potentials study

    Schöne B, Gruber T, Graetz S, Bernhof M, and Malinowski P. Mindful breath awareness meditation facilitates efficiency gains in brain networks: A steady-state visually evoked potentials study. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 13687. 2018.doi:10.1038/s41598-018- 32046-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018- 2018

  45. [46]

    Intensive Meditation Training Improves Perceptual Discrimination and Sustained Attention

    MacLean KA, Ferrer E, Aichele SR, Bridwell DA, Zanesco AP, Jacobs TL, King BG, Rosenberg EL, Sahdra BK, Shaver PR, Wallace BA, Mangun GR, and Saron CD. Intensive Meditation Training Improves Perceptual Discrimination and Sustained Attention. Psychological Science, 21(6), 829-839. 2010.doi:10.1177/0956797610371339

    work page doi:10.1177/0956797610371339 2010

  46. [47]

    TMS-EEG Shows Mindfulness Meditation Is Associated With a Different Excitation/Inhibition Balance in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

    Humble G, Geddes H, Baell O, Payne JE, Hill AT, Chung SW, Emonson M, Osborn M, Caldwell B, Fitzgerald PB, Cash R, and Bailey NW. TMS-EEG Shows Mindfulness Meditation Is Associated With a Different Excitation/Inhibition Balance in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex. Mindfulness 2025; 16:347–65.doi:10.1007/s12671-025-02519-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s12671-025-02519-6 2025

  47. [48]

    The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study

    Chung SW, Sullivan CM, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Bailey NW, Cash RFH, and Fitzgerald PB. The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study. Human Brain Mapping, 40(2), 608-627. 2019.doi:10.1002/hbm.24398

    work page doi:10.1002/hbm.24398 2019

  48. [49]

    Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential

    Cahn BR and Polich J. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72(1), 51-60. 2009.doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho. 2008.03.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho 2009

  49. [50]

    Event-related delta, theta, alpha and gamma correlates to auditory oddball processing during Vipassana meditation

    Cahn BR, Delorme A, and Polich J. Event-related delta, theta, alpha and gamma correlates to auditory oddball processing during Vipassana meditation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 100-111. 2013.doi:10.1093/scan/nss060

    work page doi:10.1093/scan/nss060 2013

  50. [51]

    Mindfulness (Vipassana) meditation: Effects on P3b event-related potential and heart rate variability

    Delgado-Pastor LC, Perakakis P, Subramanya P, Telles S, and Vila J. Mindfulness (Vipassana) meditation: Effects on P3b event-related potential and heart rate variability. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90(2), 207-214. 2013.doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.006 2013

  51. [53]

    The mindful brain at rest: Neural oscillations and aperiodic activity in experienced meditators

    McQueen B, Murphy OW, Fitzgerald PB, and Bailey NW. The mindful brain at rest: Neural oscillations and aperiodic activity in experienced meditators. Mindfulness, 15, 2484–2502. 2024.doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02461-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02461-z 2024

  52. [54]

    Focus on the Breath: Brain Decoding Reveals Internal States of Attention During Meditation

    Weng HY, Lewis-Peacock JA, Hecht FM, Uncapher MR, Ziegler DA, Farb NAS, Goldman V, Skinner S, Duncan LG, Chao MT, and Gazzaley A. Focus on the Breath: Brain Decoding Reveals Internal States of Attention During Meditation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 336. 2020.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00336

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00336 2020

  53. [55]

    Long-Term and Meditation-Specific Modulations of Brain Connectivity Revealed Through Multivariate Pattern Analysis

    Guidotti R, D’Andrea A, Basti A, Raffone A, Pizzella V, and Marzetti L. Long-Term and Meditation-Specific Modulations of Brain Connectivity Revealed Through Multivariate Pattern Analysis. Brain Topography, 36(3), 409-418. 2023.doi:10.1007/s10548-023-00950-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10548-023-00950-3 2023

  54. [56]

    The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation

    Knill DC and Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712-719. 2004.doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004. 10.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004 2004

  55. [57]

    Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in hu- man brain functional connectomics: A systems neuroscience perspective

    Zuo XN and Xing XX. Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in hu- man brain functional connectomics: A systems neuroscience perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 100-118. 2014.doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 2014

  56. [58]

    Regional electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power and asymmetry in older adults: a study of short-term test-retest reliability

    Mathewson KJ, Hashemi A, Sheng B, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ, and Schmidt LA. Regional electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha power and asymmetry in older adults: a study of short-term test-retest reliability. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7. 2015.doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015. 00177

    work page doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015 2015

  57. [59]

    Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience

    Sandved-Smith L, Bogotá JD, Hohwy J, Kiverstein J, and Lutz A. Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2025(1), Article niaf016. 2025.doi:10.1093/nc/niaf016

    work page doi:10.1093/nc/niaf016 2025

  58. [60]

    An Overview of Neurophenomenological Approaches to Meditation and Their Relevance to Clinical Research

    Lutz A, Abdoun O, Dor-Ziderman Y, Trautwein FM, and Berkovich-Ohana A. An Overview of Neurophenomenological Approaches to Meditation and Their Relevance to Clinical Research. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 10(4), 411-424. 2025.doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.008 2025

  59. [61]

    From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology

    Ramstead MJD, Seth AK, Hesp C, Sandved-Smith L, Mago J, Lifshitz M, Pagnoni G, Smith R, Dumas G, Lutz A, Friston K, and Constant A. From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 13(4), 829-857. 2022.doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y 2022

  60. [63]

    The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists

    Lindahl JR, Fisher NE, Cooper DJ, Rosen RK, and Britton WB. The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176239. 2017.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176239

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176239 2017

  61. [64]

    Neural Variability Is Quenched by Attention

    Arazi A, Yeshurun Y, and Dinstein I. Neural Variability Is Quenched by Attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(30), 5975-5985. 2019.doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0355-19.2019

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0355-19.2019 2019

  62. [65]

    A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula

    Ince RAA, Giordano BL, Kayser C, Rousselet GA, Gross J, and Schyns PG. A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 1541-1573. 2017.doi:10.1002/hbm.23471

    work page doi:10.1002/hbm.23471 2017

  63. [66]

    Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience

    Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, and Bandettini PA. Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2, 4. 2008.doi: 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008

    work page doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 2008

  64. [67]

    Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview

    Pereira F, Mitchell T, and Botvinick M. Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview. NeuroImage, 45(1 Suppl), S199–S209. 2009.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008. 11.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008 2009

  65. [68]

    Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines

    Varoquaux G, Raamana PR, Engemann DA, Hoyos-Idrobo A, Schwartz Y, and Thirion B. Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines. NeuroImage, 145, 166–179. 2017.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.038 2017

  66. [69]

    Ogoke, A

    Triantafyllou C, Polimeni JR, and Wald LL. Physiological noise and signal-to-noise ratio in fMRI with multi-channel array coils. NeuroImage, 55(2), 597-606. 2011.doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2010.11.084

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2011

  67. [70]

    Stability of transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalogram evoked potentials in pediatric epilepsy

    She X, Nix KC, Cline CC, Qi W, Tugin S, He Z, and Baumer FM. Stability of transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalogram evoked potentials in pediatric epilepsy. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 9045. 2024.doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59468-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59468-8 2024

  68. [71]

    Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons

    Groppe DM, Makeig S, and Kutas M. Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons. NeuroImage, 45(4), 1199-1211. 2009.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.038 20

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.038 2009

  69. [72]

    Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses

    Gaspar CM, Rousselet GA, and Pernet CR. Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses. NeuroImage, 58(2), 620-629. 2011.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.052

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.052 2011

  70. [73]

    A Spatiotemporal Filtering Methodology for Single-Trial ERP Component Estimation

    Li R, Principe JC, Bradley M, and Ferrari V. A Spatiotemporal Filtering Methodology for Single-Trial ERP Component Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56(1), 83-92. 2009.doi:10.1109/tbme.2008.2002153

    work page doi:10.1109/tbme.2008.2002153 2009

  71. [74]

    Toward a Unified Analysis of the Brain Criticality Hypothesis: Reviewing Several Available Tools

    Yu C. Toward a Unified Analysis of the Brain Criticality Hypothesis: Reviewing Several Available Tools. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 16, Article 911245. 2022.doi:10.3389/fncir. 2022.911245

    work page doi:10.3389/fncir 2022

  72. [75]

    Scaling of brain metabolism with a fixed energy budget per neuron: Implications for neuronal activity, plasticity and evolution

    Herculano-Houzel S. Scaling of brain metabolism with a fixed energy budget per neuron: Implications for neuronal activity, plasticity and evolution. PLOS ONE, 6(3), e17514. 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017514

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017514 2011

  73. [76]

    Appraising the brain’s energy budget

    Raichle ME and Gusnard DA. Appraising the brain’s energy budget. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(16), 10237–10239. 2002.doi:10.1073/pnas.172399499

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.172399499 2002

  74. [77]

    An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain

    Attwell D and Laughlin SB. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 21(10), 1133–1145. 2001.doi:10.1097/ 00004647-200110000-00001

    2001

  75. [78]

    How critical is brain criticality? Trends in Neurosciences, 45(11), 820-837

    O’Byrne J and Jerbi K. How critical is brain criticality? Trends in Neurosciences, 45(11), 820-837. 2022.doi:10.1016/j.tins.2022.08.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tins.2022.08.007 2022

  76. [79]

    Beyond the edge of chaos: Amplification and temporal integration by recurrent networks in the chaotic regime

    Toyoizumi T and Abbott LF. Beyond the edge of chaos: Amplification and temporal integration by recurrent networks in the chaotic regime. Physical Review E, 84(5), Article 051908. 2011. doi:10.1103/physreve.84.051908

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.84.051908 2011

  77. [80]

    Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality

    Kinouchi O and Copelli M. Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality. Nature Physics, 2(5), 348-351. 2006.doi:10.1038/nphys289

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys289 2006

  78. [81]

    The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex

    Shew WL and Plenz D. The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex. The Neuroscientist, 19(1), 88-100. 2013.doi:10.1177/1073858412445487

    work page doi:10.1177/1073858412445487 2013

  79. [82]

    Critical dynamics predicts cognitive performance and provides a common framework for heterogeneous mechanisms impacting cognition

    Müller PM, Miron G, Holtkamp M, and Meisel C. Critical dynamics predicts cognitive performance and provides a common framework for heterogeneous mechanisms impacting cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(14), Article e2417117122. 2025.doi:10.1073/pnas.2417117122

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2417117122 2025

  80. [83]

    Self-regulated critical brain dynamics originate from high frequency-band activity in the MEG

    Dürschmid S, Reichert C, Walter N, Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Ohl FW, Tononi G, and Deliano M. Self-regulated critical brain dynamics originate from high frequency-band activity in the MEG. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0233589. 2020.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233589

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233589 2020

Showing first 80 references.