pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31334 · v1 · pith:GXNW5UGSnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 💻 cs.AI

Optimization Algorithms for Joint OFDM Waveform Design and RIS Configuration in 6G Networks: From Convex Relaxation to Foundation Models

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords joint OFDM-RIS optimization6G networksmachine learning optimizationconvex relaxationsurveyspectral efficiencyreconfigurable intelligent surfaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning methods reach 95-99 percent of model-based spectral efficiency in joint OFDM-RIS optimization at 100 to 10,000 times faster inference.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys seventy-eight published works on joint optimization of OFDM waveforms and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G networks. It organizes the approaches into four paradigms ranging from convex relaxation and heuristics to deep learning and foundation models. A synthesis of the self-reported results indicates that machine learning techniques attain nearly the same sum-rate performance as traditional methods but execute far more quickly during inference. The review also demonstrates that neural network runtimes do not increase with larger problem sizes while iterative solvers do, and it identifies six open challenges including the absence of standardized benchmarks. A reader would care because this provides a map of current algorithmic options for designing efficient 6G systems and highlights where further development is required.

Core claim

Seventy-eight joint OFDM-RIS optimization works are classified into model-based convex relaxation, heuristic search, deep reinforcement and unsupervised learning, and emerging foundation model methods. Literature synthesis shows ML-based methods report 95-99% of model-based spectral efficiency at 10^2-10^4 x faster per-inference runtime. A companion benchmark reveals GPU-based neural network inference is invariant to RIS size N while iterative solvers scale polynomially.

What carries the argument

The four-paradigm classification of algorithms for the mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem of joint OFDM waveform design and RIS configuration.

If this is right

  • Neural network inference remains constant in runtime as RIS size N increases from 16 to 128.
  • Iterative solvers scale polynomially with N.
  • Standardized power models are needed for energy efficiency and PAPR benchmarks.
  • Six open challenges include hardware deployment and doubly-dispersive channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A shared benchmark would make cross-paradigm comparisons feasible and reliable.
  • The runtime invariance of neural methods points to advantages in scaling to very large RIS arrays.
  • The listed LLM safety challenge suggests that foundation model deployment in networks requires new verification methods.

Load-bearing premise

Self-reported performance figures from independent papers can be aggregated into meaningful comparisons despite the acknowledged absence of any standardized benchmark or common evaluation protocol.

What would settle it

Publication of results from a unified benchmark suite applied to instances of each paradigm that shows ML methods falling below 90% of model-based efficiency or losing their runtime advantage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31334 by Ahmet Kaplan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: PRISMA-style flow diagram. Search conducted April 2026 across IEEE Xplore, arXiv, and Google Scholar. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Four-category classification. Model-based (I) guarantee convergence; heuristics (II) trade optimality for tractability; ML (III) learns from data; emerging [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SE versus per-inference runtime. FM-DRL, Diffusion, Quantum runtimes are from cited papers. SDR is fast at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-dimensional comparison (1 = worst, 5 = best). Paradigm I excels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SAC training loop and beam search inference for RIS phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Joint OFDM-RIS optimization for 6G is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem covering sum-rate maximization, energy efficiency, max-min fairness, and peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR)-constrained objectives. Seventy-eight joint OFDM-RIS optimization works published between 2021 and 2026 are surveyed. No standardized benchmark exists, and cross-paper comparisons remain infeasible. This survey classifies these works into four paradigms: (I) model-based convex relaxation, (II) heuristic and metaheuristic search, (III) deep reinforcement and unsupervised learning, and (IV) emerging methods including foundation models (FM), diffusion-based generative AI, and quantum optimization. A literature synthesis of self-reported benchmarks shows that ML-based methods (Paradigm~III) report 95-99\% of model-based spectral efficiency at 10^2-10^4 x faster per-inference runtime (method-pair dependent; literature values are self-reported and exclude ML pre-training cost). A companion tutorial benchmark at N=16, N=64, and N=128 reveals a critical scaling property: GPU-based neural network inference (DDQN, PPO, graph neural network (GNN), unsupervised DL) is N-invariant, with identical runtime at N=16 and N=128, while iterative solvers (AO+SCA, PSO) scale polynomially. Energy efficiency (P2) and PAPR-constrained (P4) benchmarks are deferred to future work with standardized power models and waveform generators. Six open challenges emerge from the synthesis: the cross-paradigm benchmark deficit, real-world hardware-constrained deployment, joint waveform-RIS optimization for doubly-dispersive channels, multi-objective PAPR trade-offs, LLM safety in live network control, and diminishing returns of standalone heuristics. We specify requirements for a standardized benchmark. This study serves as a roadmap for researchers and practitioners working on joint OFDM-RIS optimization in 6G networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript surveys 78 papers (2021-2026) on joint OFDM waveform design and RIS configuration for 6G, which is formulated as a MINLP problem under objectives including sum-rate, energy efficiency, max-min fairness, and PAPR constraints. It classifies the works into four paradigms—(I) model-based convex relaxation, (II) heuristic/metaheuristic, (III) deep RL and unsupervised learning, and (IV) emerging methods (foundation models, diffusion, quantum)—and performs a literature synthesis of self-reported results claiming that Paradigm III achieves 95-99% of model-based spectral efficiency at 10^2-10^4× faster per-inference runtime. A companion tutorial benchmark at N=16/64/128 demonstrates that GPU-based NN inference is N-invariant while iterative solvers scale polynomially. The paper lists six open challenges and specifies requirements for a standardized benchmark.

Significance. If the synthesis and scaling observations hold, the work provides a useful roadmap that quantifies the performance-runtime trade-off across paradigms and highlights the cross-paradigm benchmark deficit as a central obstacle for 6G research. The tutorial benchmark's demonstration of N-invariant GPU inference versus polynomial scaling of AO+SCA/PSO is a concrete, falsifiable observation that could guide deployment choices.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; literature synthesis] Abstract and literature-synthesis section: The central quantitative claim that 'ML-based methods (Paradigm III) report 95-99% of model-based spectral efficiency at 10^2-10^4× faster per-inference runtime' is obtained by aggregating self-reported values across 78 papers. The manuscript simultaneously states that 'no standardized benchmark exists, and cross-paper comparisons remain infeasible' because works optimize distinct objectives, use non-identical channel models, antenna/RIS sizes, and power constraints. This internal tension makes the headline performance numbers rest on an assumption the authors themselves reject; the claim is therefore not supported by the evidence presented.
  2. [Tutorial benchmark] Tutorial benchmark description: The scaling result (GPU inference N-invariant at N=16 vs. N=128) is presented as a 'critical scaling property,' yet the manuscript defers energy-efficiency (P2) and PAPR-constrained (P4) benchmarks to future work without providing the standardized power models or waveform generators needed to replicate or extend the N=16/64/128 experiments. This limits the load-bearing status of the scaling observation for the multi-objective claims.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Classification section] The four-paradigm taxonomy is clearly motivated, but the boundary between Paradigm III (deep RL/unsupervised) and Paradigm IV (foundation models, diffusion) is not sharply delineated; several works could plausibly fit both.
  2. [Literature synthesis] Citation of the 78 papers is comprehensive, but the manuscript would benefit from an explicit table or appendix listing the exact objective, channel model, and reported metric for each work used in the 95-99% synthesis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential value of the survey as a roadmap. We address each major comment below with specific revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract; literature synthesis] Abstract and literature-synthesis section: The central quantitative claim that 'ML-based methods (Paradigm III) report 95-99% of model-based spectral efficiency at 10^2-10^4× faster per-inference runtime' is obtained by aggregating self-reported values across 78 papers. The manuscript simultaneously states that 'no standardized benchmark exists, and cross-paper comparisons remain infeasible' because works optimize distinct objectives, use non-identical channel models, antenna/RIS sizes, and power constraints. This internal tension makes the headline performance numbers rest on an assumption the authors themselves reject; the claim is therefore not supported by the evidence presented.

    Authors: We agree that the aggregation of self-reported results across heterogeneous experimental setups creates a tension with the explicit statement that standardized benchmarks are absent. The 95-99% figure is presented with the qualifier that values are self-reported and exclude pre-training costs, but the framing can be strengthened. In the revised manuscript we will edit both the abstract and the literature-synthesis section to state more explicitly that these numbers represent indicative trends drawn from the surveyed literature rather than direct, controlled comparisons, and we will add a dedicated caveat paragraph underscoring the infeasibility of cross-paper quantitative claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Tutorial benchmark] Tutorial benchmark description: The scaling result (GPU inference N-invariant at N=16 vs. N=128) is presented as a 'critical scaling property,' yet the manuscript defers energy-efficiency (P2) and PAPR-constrained (P4) benchmarks to future work without providing the standardized power models or waveform generators needed to replicate or extend the N=16/64/128 experiments. This limits the load-bearing status of the scaling observation for the multi-objective claims.

    Authors: We accept that the current tutorial benchmark is scoped to runtime scaling under sum-rate maximization and that the deferred objectives limit its applicability to the full multi-objective setting. In the revision we will (i) add an explicit scope statement to the benchmark subsection clarifying that the N-invariance result applies to the tested objective and configurations, and (ii) expand the 'requirements for a standardized benchmark' section with concrete proposals for power-consumption models and PAPR waveform generators. These additions will both acknowledge the present limitation and supply the missing elements needed for future multi-objective extensions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: survey reports external literature values without internal derivation reducing to fitted inputs

full rationale

The manuscript is a literature survey classifying 78 external papers into paradigms and reporting their self-stated performance numbers. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or model predictions are defined within the paper itself. The synthesis of 95-99% SE and speed-up figures is presented as an aggregation of external self-reported results (with explicit caveats on incomparability), not as a quantity derived from the paper's own inputs or ansatz. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or renaming of known results occurs in a load-bearing derivation. The central claims rest on external sources rather than reducing to the paper's own construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of classifying 78 papers into four paradigms and synthesizing their self-reported metrics despite acknowledged non-comparability.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Self-reported performance metrics from surveyed papers are comparable enough for synthesis despite no standardized benchmark existing
    Abstract states 'No standardized benchmark exists, and cross-paper comparisons remain infeasible' yet performs the synthesis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5891 in / 1300 out tokens · 42871 ms · 2026-07-01T05:27:13.877909+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A survey on channel estimation and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless communications,

    B. Zheng, C. You, W. Mei, and R. Zhang, “A survey on channel estimation and practical passive beamforming design for intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless communications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1035–1071, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3155305

  2. [2]

    A unifying view of OTFS and its many variants,

    Q. Deng, Z. Ding, and Z. Wang, “A unifying view of OTFS and its many variants,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–1, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2025.3542467

  3. [3]

    Performance evaluation and optimization for 6G networks: A survey of KPIs, tools, and AI models,

    M. M. Islam, K. Hasan, and S. H. Jeong, “Performance evaluation and optimization for 6G networks: A survey of KPIs, tools, and AI models,” ICT Express, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 390–416, Apr. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2025.12.012

  4. [4]

    A survey on model- based, heuristic, and machine learning optimization approaches in RIS- aided wireless networks,

    H. Zhou, M. Erol-Kantarci, Y . Liu, and H. V . Poor, “A survey on model- based, heuristic, and machine learning optimization approaches in RIS- aided wireless networks,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 781–823, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst. 2023.3340099

  5. [5]

    A survey of PAPR techniques based on machine learning,

    B. S. de C. da Silva, V . D. P. Souto, R. D. Souza, and L. L. Mendes, “A survey of PAPR techniques based on machine learning,”Sensors, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 1918, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/s24061918

  6. [6]

    DeepOFW: Deep learning-driven OFDM- flexible waveform modulation for peak-to-average power ratio reduc- tion,

    R. Greidi and K. Cohen, “DeepOFW: Deep learning-driven OFDM- flexible waveform modulation for peak-to-average power ratio reduc- tion,”arXiv:2603.23544, Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/2603.23544

  7. [7]

    Recon- figurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and design considerations,

    K. K. Biliaminu, J. Rodriguez, F. Gil-Casti ˜neira, and J. Bastos, “Recon- figurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and design considerations,”In- techOpen, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen. 1012750

  8. [8]

    Heuristic algorithms for RIS-assisted wireless networks: Exploring heuristic-aided machine learning,

    H. Zhou, M. Erol-Kantarci, Y . Liu, and H. V . Poor, “Heuristic algorithms for RIS-assisted wireless networks: Exploring heuristic-aided machine learning,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 106–114, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.010.2300321

  9. [9]

    An overview of machine learning-enabled optimization for RIS-aided 6G networks: From reinforcement learning to large language models,

    H. Zhou, C. Hu, and X. Liu, “An overview of machine learning-enabled optimization for RIS-aided 6G networks: From reinforcement learning to large language models,”arXiv:2405.17439, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17439

  10. [10]

    Machine learning approaches for reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces: A survey,

    K. M. Faisal and W. Choi, “Machine learning approaches for reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces: A survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 27343– 27367, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022. 3157651

  11. [11]

    Joint beamforming optimization design and performance evaluation of RIS- aided wireless networks: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review,

    L. Ibrahim, M. N. Mahmud, M. F. M. Salleh, and A. Al-Rimawi, “Joint beamforming optimization design and performance evaluation of RIS- aided wireless networks: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 141801–141859, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3342320

  12. [12]

    Beam- forming and resource allocation for delay minimization in RIS-assisted OFDM systems,

    Y . Ma, X. Li, C. Guo, L. Liang, M. Matthaiou, and S. Jin, “Beam- forming and resource allocation for delay minimization in RIS-assisted OFDM systems,”arXiv:2506.03586, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03586

  13. [13]

    Resource allocation for RIS-enhanced OFDM-MIMO ISAC systems,

    P. Zivuku, V .-D. Nguyen, N. T. Nguyen, K. Ntontin, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “Resource allocation for RIS-enhanced OFDM-MIMO ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, 2026. [Online]. Avail- able: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2025.3637097

  14. [14]

    DRL-based RIS phase shift design for OFDM communication systems,

    P. Chen, X. Li, M. Matthaiou, and S. Jin, “DRL-based RIS phase shift design for OFDM communication systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 733–737, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2023.3242449

  15. [15]

    Unsupervised learning- based joint resource allocation and beamforming design for RIS-assisted MISO-OFDMA systems,

    Y . Ma, X. Zhou, X. Li, L. Liang, and S. Jin, “Unsupervised learning- based joint resource allocation and beamforming design for RIS-assisted MISO-OFDMA systems,”IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 12, pp. 2251–2264, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/tccn. 2025.3592931

  16. [16]

    A heuristic-integrated DRL approach for phase optimization in large-scale RISs,

    W. Wang, P. Li, A. Doufexi, and M. A. Beach, “A heuristic-integrated DRL approach for phase optimization in large-scale RISs,”IEEE Com- mun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1579–1583, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2025.3568652

  17. [17]

    Deep reinforcement learning-based precoding for multi- RIS-aided multiuser downlink systems with practical phase shift,

    P.-H. Chou, B.-R. Zheng, W.-J. Huang, W. Saad, Y . Tsao, and R. Y . Chang, “Deep reinforcement learning-based precoding for multi- RIS-aided multiuser downlink systems with practical phase shift,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23–27, Jan. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2024.3482720

  18. [18]

    Deep reinforcement learning for maximizing downlink spectral efficiency in non-stationary RIS-aided multiuser-MISO systems,

    H. Zhang, X. Huang, Z. Guan, R.-R. Chen, A. Farhang, and M. Ji, “Deep reinforcement learning for maximizing downlink spectral efficiency in non-stationary RIS-aided multiuser-MISO systems,”European WIRE- LESS 2025; 30th European Wireless Conference. pp. 196-201 (2025) [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10164189

  19. [19]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Wire- less Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, Nov. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2019.2936025

  20. [20]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wire- less communication,

    C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, A. Zappone, C. Yuen, and M. Deb- bah, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wire- less communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 8, AHMET KAPLAN 20 pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ twc.2019.2922609

  21. [21]

    Intelligent reflect- ing surface enhanced wireless networks: Two-timescale beamforming optimization,

    M. M. Zhao, Q. Wu, M. J. Zhao, and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflect- ing surface enhanced wireless networks: Two-timescale beamforming optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 2– 17, Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2020. 3022297

  22. [22]

    Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,

    S. Abeywickrama, R. Zhang, Q. Wu, and C. Yuen, “Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5849–5863, Sep. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/icc40277.2020.9148961

  23. [23]

    Didimo, G

    W. Luo, X. Huang, and Y . Fang, “Optimization in RIS-empowered wireless networks,” inEncyclopedia of Optimization. P. M. Pardalos and O. A. Prokopyev, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 1– 10, 2025, doi:10.1007/978−3−030−54621−2 476−1. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54621-2 476-1

  24. [24]

    Impact of metaheuristic optimization algorithms on wireless network coverage enhancement with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    N. Panuganti, P. Ranjan, and A. Shukla, “Impact of metaheuristic optimization algorithms on wireless network coverage enhancement with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 38, no. 5, p. e70026, Mar. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac. 70026

  25. [25]

    6G wireless communications and AI-controlled reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From supervised to federated learning,

    E. A. Zaoutis, G. S. Liodakis, A. T. Baklezos, C. D. Nikolopoulos, M. P. Ioannidou, and I. O. Vardiambasis, “6G wireless communications and AI-controlled reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: From supervised to federated learning,”Appl. Sci. (MDPI), vol. 15, no. 6, p. 3252, Mar. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063252

  26. [26]

    Large wireless foundation models: Stronger over bigger,

    X. Cheng, B. Liu, X. Liu, and X. Cai, “Large wireless foundation models: Stronger over bigger,”arXiv:2601.10963, Jan. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10963

  27. [27]

    Foundation model-aided deep reinforcement learning for RIS-assisted wireless communication,

    M. Ghassemi, S. F. Mobarak, H. Zhang, A. Afana, A. B. Sediq, and M. Erol-Kantarci, “Foundation model-aided deep reinforcement learning for RIS-assisted wireless communication,” inProc. IEEE PIMRC, 2025, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/pimrc62392.2025. 11274561

  28. [28]

    Foundation model-aided hierarchical deep reinforcement learning for blockage-aware link in RIS-assisted networks,

    M. Ghassemi, H. Zhang, A. Afana, A. B. Sediq, and M. Erol-Kantarci, “Foundation model-aided hierarchical deep reinforcement learning for blockage-aware link in RIS-assisted networks,”arXiv:2602.09157, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09157

  29. [29]

    Large language model (LLM)-enabled reinforcement learning for wireless network optimization,

    J. Zheng, R. Zhang, D. Niyato, H. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Du, J. Kang, and Z. Xiong, “Large language model (LLM)-enabled reinforcement learning for wireless network optimization,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 82–89, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.001. 2500384

  30. [30]

    ComAgent: Multi-LLM based agentic AI empowered intelligent wire- less networks,

    H. Li, M. Xiao, K. Wang, R. Schober, D. I. Kim, and Y . L. Guan, “ComAgent: Multi-LLM based agentic AI empowered intelligent wire- less networks,”arXiv:2601.19607, 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2601.19607

  31. [31]

    Towards native intelligence: 6G-LLM trained with reinforcement learning from NDT feedback,

    Z. Xiao, T. Tao, C. Ye, Y . Hu, Y . Feng, T. Jiao, and L. Cai, “Towards native intelligence: 6G-LLM trained with reinforcement learning from NDT feedback,”arXiv:2601.09992, Jan. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09992

  32. [32]

    Large language models in 6G from standard to on- device networks,

    H. Zou, Q. Zhao, S. Lasaulce, C. Zhang, Y . Tian, L. Bariah, F. Bader, and M. Debbah, “Large language models in 6G from standard to on- device networks,”Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 123–134, Jan. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-025-00239-6

  33. [33]

    A Graph Foundation Model for Wireless Resource Allocation

    Y . Sheng, J. Wang, L. Liang, H. Ye, and S. Jin, “A graph foundation model for wireless resource allocation,”arXiv:2604.07390, Apr. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07390

  34. [34]

    Large language model enhanced multi-agent systems for 6G communications,

    F. Jiang, Y . Peng, L. Dong, K. Wang, K. Yang, C. Pan, D. Niyato, and O. A. Dobre, “Large language model enhanced multi-agent systems for 6G communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 48– 55, Dec. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.016. 2300600

  35. [35]

    When large language model agents meet 6G networks: Perception, grounding, and alignment,

    M. Xu, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, S. Mao, Z. Han, D. I. Kim, and K. B. Letaief, “When large language model agents meet 6G networks: Perception, grounding, and alignment,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 63–71, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc. 005.2400019

  36. [36]

    Channel estimation for RIS-assisted mmWave systems via diffusion models,

    Y . Wang, Y . Xu, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, M. Dai, H. Wang, B. Liu, D. He, and M. Tao, “Channel estimation for RIS-assisted mmWave systems via diffusion models,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 30, pp. 597–601, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2025.3645078

  37. [37]

    Diffusion model- based channel estimation for RIS-aided communication systems,

    W. Tong, W. Xu, F. Wang, W. Ni, and J. Zhang, “Diffusion model- based channel estimation for RIS-aided communication systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2586–2590, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lwc.2024.3431525

  38. [38]

    Generative diffusion models for wireless networks: Fundamental, architecture, and state-of- the-art,

    D. Fan, R. Meng, X. Xu, Y . Liu, G. Nan, C. Feng, S. Han, S. Gao, B. Xu, D. Niyato, T. Q. S. Quek, and P. Zhang, “Generative diffusion models for wireless networks: Fundamental, architecture, and state-of- the-art,”arXiv:2507.16733, Jul. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/2507.16733

  39. [39]

    Generative AI-driven phase control for RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO sys- tems,

    K. K. Patel, M. Chakraborty, E. Sharma, and S. K. Singh, “Generative AI-driven phase control for RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO sys- tems,”arXiv:2602.11226, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.11226

  40. [40]

    Trajectory-aware multi- RIS activation and configuration: A Riemannian diffusion method,

    K. Wang, B. Yang, Y . Lei, Z. Li, Z. Yu, X. Cao, B. Guo, G. C. Alexan- dropoulos, D. Niyato, M. Debbah, and Z. Han, “Trajectory-aware multi- RIS activation and configuration: A Riemannian diffusion method,” arXiv:2602.07937, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2602.07937

  41. [41]

    Decision transformers for RIS-assisted systems with dif- fusion model-based channel acquisition,

    J. Zhang, Y . Ni, J. Li, G. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Shi, S. Jin, W. Chen, and H. V . Poor, “Decision transformers for RIS-assisted systems with dif- fusion model-based channel acquisition,”arXiv:2501.08007, Jan. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08007

  42. [42]

    Quantum Graph Neural Networks for Double-Sided Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Optimization

    N. Hassan, X. Fernando, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Quantum graph neural networks for double-sided reconfigurable intelligent surface op- timization,”arXiv:2604.10453, Apr. 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2604.10453

  43. [43]

    Quantum manifold optimization: A design framework for future communications systems,

    G. Rexhepi, H. S. Rou, and G. T. F. de Abreu, “Quantum manifold optimization: A design framework for future communications systems,” arXiv:2504.09667, Apr. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2504.09667

  44. [44]

    Path-Based Quantum Meta-Learning for Adaptive Optimization of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces

    N. Hassan, X. Fernando, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Path-based quantum meta-learning for adaptive optimization of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”arXiv:2604.17690, Apr. 2026. [Online]. Available: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2604.17690

  45. [45]

    Quantum-inspired resource optimization for 6G networks: A survey,

    M. O. Butt, N. Waheed, T. Q. Duong, and W. Ejaz, “Quantum-inspired resource optimization for 6G networks: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2973–3019, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2024.3519865

  46. [46]

    Beamforming design and association scheme for multi-RIS multi-user mmWave systems through graph neural networks,

    M. Liu, C. Huang, A. Alhammadi, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Beamforming design and association scheme for multi-RIS multi-user mmWave systems through graph neural networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 7940–7954, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2025.3563529

  47. [47]

    GNN based joint beamforming design for extremely large-scale RIS assisted near- field ISAC systems,

    J. Chen, F. Wang, G. Han, X. Wang, and V . K. N. Lau, “GNN based joint beamforming design for extremely large-scale RIS assisted near- field ISAC systems,”arXiv:2603.01379, Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01379

  48. [48]

    Joint optimization based on two-phase GNN in RIS- and DF-assisted MISO systems with fine-grained rate demands,

    H. Tang, J. Zhang, Z. Zhao, H. Wu, H. Sun, and P. Jiao, “Joint optimization based on two-phase GNN in RIS- and DF-assisted MISO systems with fine-grained rate demands,”arXiv:2506.02642, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02642

  49. [50]

    RIS-assisted OTFS commu- nications: Phase configuration via received-energy maximization,

    M. H. Dinan and A. Farhang, “RIS-assisted OTFS commu- nications: Phase configuration via received-energy maximization,” arXiv:2404.07759, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2404.07759

  50. [51]

    Coef- ficients optimization and low-complexity equalization for OTFS-RIS system,

    R. Ouchikh, T. Chonavel, A. A ¨ıssa-El-Bey, and M. Djeddou, “Coef- ficients optimization and low-complexity equalization for OTFS-RIS system,” inProc. IEEE Middle East Conf. Commun. Netw. (MECOM), Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mecom67453. 2025.11439645

  51. [52]

    Comparison of OTFS and OFDM for RIS-aided systems in the presence of phase noise,

    S. McWade and A. Farhang, “Comparison of OTFS and OFDM for RIS-aided systems in the presence of phase noise,”arXiv:2602.12804, Feb. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12804

  52. [53]

    Hybrid PSO-GD phase opti- mization for RIS-assisted AFDM systems,

    V . Saiprudhvi and H. Subramaniyam, “Hybrid PSO-GD phase opti- mization for RIS-assisted AFDM systems,”Phys. Commun., vol. 73, Art. 102891, Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1874490725002940

  53. [54]

    Deep learning optimization of STAR-RIS for en- hanced data rate and energy efficiency in 6G wireless networks,

    A. Megahed, A. M. Abd El-Haleem, M. M. Elmesalawy, and I. I. Ibrahim, “Deep learning optimization of STAR-RIS for en- hanced data rate and energy efficiency in 6G wireless networks,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-025-09774-6

  54. [55]

    Joint phase-shift and power allocation optimization in RIS-enhanced wireless networks: An intelligent framework,

    M. Ejaz, G. Jinsong, M. Asim, M. A. Wani, and K. A. Shakil, “Joint phase-shift and power allocation optimization in RIS-enhanced wireless networks: An intelligent framework,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., AHMET KAPLAN 21 vol. 6, pp. 7389–7404, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1109/ojcoms.2025.3602856

  55. [56]

    Channel estimation for reconfigurable intelligent surface- aided 6G NOMA systems using CNN-based quantum LSTM model,

    N. Q. T. Thoong, A. A. Cheema, S. R. Khosravirad, O. A. Dobre, and T. Q. Duong, “Channel estimation for reconfigurable intelligent surface- aided 6G NOMA systems using CNN-based quantum LSTM model,” inProc. IEEE 100th Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2024-Fall), 2024, pp. 1–

  56. [57]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/vtc2024-fall63153.2024

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/vtc2024-fall63153.2024. 10757552

  57. [58]

    Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization problems,

    Z.-Q. Luo, W.-K. Ma, A. M.-C. So, Y . Ye, and S. Zhang, “Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization problems,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 20–34, May 2010. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/msp.2010.936019

  58. [59]

    Robust optimization for IRS- assisted SAGIN under channel uncertainty,

    Y . Li, X. Wang, J. Zhang, and Z. Chen, “Robust optimization for IRS- assisted SAGIN under channel uncertainty,”Future Internet, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 452, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ fi17100452

  59. [60]

    Hybrid vector message passing for cascaded channel estimation in RIS-aided multi-user MIMO-OFDM systems,

    W. Jiang, X. Yuan, and M. Di Renzo, “Hybrid vector message passing for cascaded channel estimation in RIS-aided multi-user MIMO-OFDM systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 4174–4189,

  60. [61]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2025.3536283

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2025.3536283

  61. [62]

    Multi-scale attention based channel estimation for RIS- aided massive MIMO systems,

    Y . Jinet al., “Multi-scale attention based channel estimation for RIS- aided massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3680–3694, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ twc.2023.3329387

  62. [63]

    Deep learning for super- resolution channel estimation in reconfigurable intelligent surface aided systems,

    W. Shen, Z. Qin, and A. Nallanathan, “Deep learning for super- resolution channel estimation in reconfigurable intelligent surface aided systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1491–1503, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2023.3239621

  63. [65]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based multi-user system: Channel estimation and beamforming design with experimental valida- tion,

    Y . Geet al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based multi-user system: Channel estimation and beamforming design with experimental valida- tion,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 6569–6582, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3400909

  64. [66]

    Model-driven Bayesian reinforcement learning for IRS- assisted massive MIMO-OFDM channel feedback, beamforming, and IRS control,

    Y . Zhanget al., “Model-driven Bayesian reinforcement learning for IRS- assisted massive MIMO-OFDM channel feedback, beamforming, and IRS control,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2024.3522098

  65. [67]

    WMMSE-based joint transceiver design for multi-RIS- assisted cell-free networks using hybrid CSI,

    Z. Wanget al., “WMMSE-based joint transceiver design for multi-RIS- assisted cell-free networks using hybrid CSI,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 6310–6325, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2025.3562138

  66. [68]

    Joint precoding and AP selection for energy-efficient RIS- aided cell-free massive MIMO with multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    Y . Liet al., “Joint precoding and AP selection for energy-efficient RIS- aided cell-free massive MIMO with multi-agent reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1234–1249, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2026.3678661

  67. [69]

    Beamforming optimization and ADMM-based detection in IRS-aided OTFS systems,

    K. Dekaet al., “Beamforming optimization and ADMM-based detection in IRS-aided OTFS systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 7890–7904, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ ojcoms.2025.3548271

  68. [70]

    IRS-OTFS systems: Design of reflection coefficients for low-complexity ZF equalizer,

    R. K. Yadav, H. B. Mishra, and S. Mukhopadhyay, “IRS-OTFS systems: Design of reflection coefficients for low-complexity ZF equalizer,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 17430–17435, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2024.3400529

  69. [72]

    Channel estimation and detection for intelligent reflect- ing surface-assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,

    X. Chenet al., “Channel estimation and detection for intelligent reflect- ing surface-assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8419–8433, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2024.3349707

  70. [73]

    IRS-assisted OTFS: Beamforming design and signal detection,

    K. Dekaet al., “IRS-assisted OTFS: Beamforming design and signal detection,”arXiv:2408.02219, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https:// arxiv.org/abs/2408.02219

  71. [74]

    A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,

    X. Liuet al., “A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems,”IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol., vol. 6, pp. 1881–1909, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1109/ojvt.2025.3573208

  72. [75]

    Input-output relation and performance of RIS- aided OTFS with fractional delay-Doppler,

    S. R. Kumariet al., “Input-output relation and performance of RIS- aided OTFS with fractional delay-Doppler,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2024, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1109/lcomm.2022.3214678

  73. [76]

    Active reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Expanding the frontiers of wireless communication — A survey,

    R. M. Asifet al., “Active reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Expanding the frontiers of wireless communication — A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2361–2407, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2024.3423460

  74. [77]

    Active RIS-assisted MIMO-OFDM system: Analy- ses and prototype measurements,

    D. M. Chianet al., “Active RIS-assisted MIMO-OFDM system: Analy- ses and prototype measurements,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 208–212, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ lcomm.2023.3333688

  75. [78]

    Trials for RIS-aided wireless com- munications,

    S. Hassouna, J. u. R. Kazim, J. Rains, M. A. Jamshed, M. u. Rehman, M. A. Imran, and Q. H. Abbasi, “Trials for RIS-aided wireless com- munications,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag. (APS), 2023, pp. 75–76. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/APS.2023.00000

  76. [79]

    Beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in wideband OFDM communications: Circuit-based modeling and opti- mization,

    H. Liet al., “Beyond diagonal reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in wideband OFDM communications: Circuit-based modeling and opti- mization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14780– 14795, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2025. 3532616

  77. [80]

    Variational Bayesian multiuser tracking for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided MIMO-OFDM systems,

    Y . Liuet al., “Variational Bayesian multiuser tracking for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided MIMO-OFDM systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3806–3821, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2023.3322792

  78. [81]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided OFDM wire- less communications: Hardware aspects of reflection optimization meth- ods,

    K. Wanget al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided OFDM wire- less communications: Hardware aspects of reflection optimization meth- ods,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1680–1694, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/mocast54814.2022.9837634

  79. [82]

    A gradient ascent based low complexity rate maximiza- tion algorithm for intelligent reflecting surface-aided OFDM systems,

    Y . Zhanget al., “A gradient ascent based low complexity rate maximiza- tion algorithm for intelligent reflecting surface-aided OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 13590–13595, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2023.3289865

  80. [83]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A hardware-centric review of structures, implementation, evaluation, and integration with UA V and ML,

    S. Zhanget al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: A hardware-centric review of structures, implementation, evaluation, and integration with UA V and ML,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1682– 1720, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025. 3575583

Showing first 80 references.