pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31389 · v1 · pith:BYYVYQ7Rnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE

Cooling of Hybrid Stars with a 2SC+<dd> Phase

Tsuneo Noda , Akira Dohi , Nobutoshi Yasutake , Huan Chen , Toshiki Maruyama , Toshitaka Tatsumi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HE
keywords hybrid starsquark superfluidityneutron star coolingcolor superconductivity2SC phase3P2 superfluiditybeta decay suppression
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid stars with the 2SC+dd phase cool more slowly than those with the 2SC phase and resemble the CFL phase in their thermal evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a newly proposed color-superconductive state called the 2SC+dd phase affects the cooling of hybrid stars, which contain both hadronic and quark matter. This phase is proposed to connect smoothly to low-density baryon superfluidity, inheriting the neutron 3P2 superfluidity to unpaired d-quarks on the high-density side. As a result, the suppression of quark beta decay makes these stars hotter during cooling compared to standard 2SC quark matter, bringing their behavior closer to color-flavor-locked stars. A sympathetic reader would care because this could allow distinguishing the phase through observations of cool pulsars such as Vela and 3C58.

Core claim

Hybrid stars incorporating the 2SC+dd phase become hotter than those with the traditional 2SC phase during their thermal evolution and approach the cooling characteristics of the CFL phase. The 3P2 superfluidity plays a key role in the cooling curves specifically for the 2SC+dd phase by suppressing quark beta decay, unlike in the 2SC case. This is the first study of the thermal evolution under this scenario proposed by Fujimoto, Fukushima and Weise.

What carries the argument

The 2SC+dd phase, which smoothly connects low-density baryon superfluidity to high-density quark matter, enabling the inheritance of neutron 3P2 superfluidity by unpaired d-quarks and thereby suppressing beta decay processes.

If this is right

  • Neutron stars with 2SC+dd phase exhibit higher temperatures at given ages compared to 2SC phase models.
  • The 3P2 superfluidity significantly influences cooling only when the 2SC+dd phase is present.
  • Low-temperature observations of pulsars like Vela, 3C58, Vela Jr. could distinguish this phase if the scenario holds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 2SC+dd phase is realized, it may require revisiting assumptions about quark pairing in dense matter models.
  • Future simulations could test how this phase affects other observables such as neutrino emission rates in hybrid stars.

Load-bearing premise

The 2SC+dd phase exists in hybrid stars and allows the neutron 3P2 superfluidity to be inherited by unpaired d-quarks from the low-density side.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that observed cooling curves of pulsars like Vela match predictions for the 2SC phase rather than the hotter curves for 2SC+dd would indicate the phase does not occur as proposed.

read the original abstract

Recently, Fujimoto, Fukushima & Weise (2019) have proposed a new colour-superconductive state, 2SC+$<dd>$ phase, which can be smoothly connected to the low-density baryon superfluidity in contrast to the 2SC phase. In this scenario, the neutron ${}^3P_2$ superfluidity on the low-density side of the phase transition is inherited by unpaired $d$-quarks in the 2SC phase on the high-density side. Since this could be realized in hybrid stars (neutron stars containing hadronic and quark matter), the 2SC+$<dd>$ phase may change the properties of neutron stars compared to the traditional 2SC phase. In this work, we study the thermal evolution of hybrid stars with the 2SC+$<dd>$ phase for the first time. We find that NSs with the 2SC+$<dd>$ phase become hotter than those with the 2SC phase, and are close to the CFL phase. The ${}^{3}P_2$ superfluidity plays an important role in cooling curves with not the 2SC but 2SC+$<dd>$ phases due to the suppression of quark $\beta$ decay. We therefore point out that, if the scenario of 2SC+$<dd>$ phase is true, it could be specified through low-temperature observations such as Vela, 3C58, Vela Jr., and Vela-like pulsar.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the thermal evolution of hybrid stars containing the 2SC+<dd> color-superconducting phase proposed by Fujimoto, Fukushima & Weise (2019). In this phase the neutron 3P2 superfluidity is inherited by unpaired d-quarks, suppressing quark β-decay processes. The central result is that hybrid stars with the 2SC+<dd> phase cool more slowly than those with the conventional 2SC phase and produce cooling curves close to those of the CFL phase; the 3P2 gap is shown to be decisive only in the 2SC+<dd> case. The authors suggest that low-temperature observations of pulsars such as Vela could distinguish the phase.

Significance. If the 2SC+<dd> phase is realized, the work supplies a concrete, observationally testable signature that distinguishes it from the standard 2SC phase through the inherited superfluidity and the resulting suppression of quark Urca processes. The explicit linkage between the low-density baryon superfluidity and the high-density quark pairing is a clear modeling strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] §3 (or equivalent results section): the quantitative temperature offset between 2SC+<dd> and 2SC curves is presented without a sensitivity study on the amplitude of the inherited 3P2 gap; because the suppression of β-decay is the load-bearing mechanism, the robustness of the offset to plausible variations in that gap must be shown.
  2. [Model] §2 (model description): the matching condition at the hadron-quark interface that transmits the 3P2 gap is stated only qualitatively; an explicit functional form or table of gap values across the transition density is required to make the cooling calculation reproducible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation 2SC+<dd> is introduced without a brief reminder of its microscopic definition in the introduction; a one-sentence restatement would aid readers unfamiliar with Fujimoto et al. (2019).
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the cooling curves should state the stellar mass, the hadronic EOS, and the quark gap parameters used, rather than referring only to the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested improvements into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] §3 (or equivalent results section): the quantitative temperature offset between 2SC+<dd> and 2SC curves is presented without a sensitivity study on the amplitude of the inherited 3P2 gap; because the suppression of β-decay is the load-bearing mechanism, the robustness of the offset to plausible variations in that gap must be shown.

    Authors: We agree that a sensitivity study on the inherited 3P2 gap amplitude is necessary to demonstrate the robustness of the temperature offset, given that gap suppression of quark β-decay is central to the result. In the revised manuscript we will add calculations varying the gap amplitude over a plausible range (consistent with the Fujimoto et al. 2019 framework) and include the corresponding cooling curves to quantify how the offset between the 2SC+<dd> and 2SC cases responds to these changes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model] §2 (model description): the matching condition at the hadron-quark interface that transmits the 3P2 gap is stated only qualitatively; an explicit functional form or table of gap values across the transition density is required to make the cooling calculation reproducible.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the interface matching was described qualitatively in the original text. The 3P2 gap is transmitted from the hadronic 3P2 superfluidity to the unpaired d-quarks according to the 2SC+<dd> construction of Fujimoto, Fukushima & Weise (2019). To ensure reproducibility we will add an explicit functional form (or a table of gap values versus density) for the inherited gap across the hadron-quark transition density in the model section of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are conditional consequences of an external phase model

full rationale

The paper adopts the 2SC+<dd> phase from Fujimoto, Fukushima & Weise (2019) as an external premise and computes standard cooling curves for hybrid stars, finding hotter temperatures due to inherited 3P2 superfluidity suppressing quark beta decay. No quoted equations or steps reduce these outcomes to fitted inputs renamed as predictions, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations by the same authors. The central claims are explicitly conditional on the phase scenario being true and are presented as direct computational consequences rather than independent derivations that loop back to the paper's own inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is supplied, so the ledger cannot be populated with concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities from the manuscript; the central claim rests on the existence of the 2SC+<dd> phase as defined in the cited 2019 work and on standard assumptions about neutrino emissivity in quark matter.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5825 in / 1273 out tokens · 38763 ms · 2026-07-01T02:53:01.520247+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Fukushima, and T

    K. Fukushima, and T. Hatsuda, Reports on Progress in Phys ics74, 014001 (2011) arXiv:1005.4814

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Steiner, S

    A.W. Steiner, S. Reddy, and M. Prakash, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094007 (2002) arXiv:hep-ph/0205201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  3. [3]

    Alford, J.A

    M.G. Alford, J.A. Bowers, J.M. Cheyne, and G.A. Cowan, Ph ys. Rev. D 67, 054018 (2003) arXiv:hep- ph/0210106

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Bailin, and A

    D. Bailin, and A. Love, Phys. Rep. 107, 325–385 (1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    Alford, K

    M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Physics Letters B422, 247–256 (1998) arXiv:hep-ph/9711395

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Alford, K

    M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Nuclear Physics B537, 443–458 (1999) arXiv:hep-ph/9804403

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Alford, and K

    M. Alford, and K. Rajagopal, Journal of High Energy Physi cs2002, 031 (2002) arXiv:hep-ph/0204001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Abuki, and T

    H. Abuki, and T. Kunihiro, Nucl. Phys. A 768, 118–159 (2006) arXiv:hep-ph/0509172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Neumann, M

    F. Neumann, M. Buballa, and M. Oertel, Nucl. Phys. A 714, 481–501 (2003) arXiv:hep-ph/0210078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    Alford, A

    M.G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Sch¨ afer, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 1455–1515 (2008) arXiv:0709.4635

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Tamagaki, Progress of Theoretical Physics 44, 905–928 (1970)

    R. Tamagaki, Progress of Theoretical Physics 44, 905–928 (1970). 16/18

    1970

  12. [12]

    Page, J.M

    D. Page, J.M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, and A.W. Steiner, Ed s. K. H. Bennemann and J. B. Ketterson, (2013) arXiv:1302.6626

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Takatsuka, and R

    T. Takatsuka, and R. Tamagaki, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 112, 27–65 (1993)

    1993

  14. [14]

    Wambach, T.L

    J. Wambach, T.L. Ainsworth, and D. Pines, Nucl. Phys. A 555, 128–150 (1993)

    1993

  15. [15]

    T. Kojo, D. Hou, J. Okafor, and H. Togashi, Phys. Rev. D 104, 063036 (2021) arXiv:2012.01650

    arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Demorest, T

    P.B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S.M. Ransom, M.S.E. Robert s, and J.W.T. Hessels, Nature 467, 1081–1083 (2010) arXiv:1010.5788

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Antoniadis, P.C.C

    J. Antoniadis, P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, T.M. Tauris, and R .S. Lynch et al. , Science 340, 448 (2013) arXiv:1304.6875

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Cromartie, E

    H.T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S.M. Ransom, P.B. Demorest , and Z. Arzoumanian et al. , Nat. Astron. 4, 72–76 (2020) arXiv:1904.06759

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Romani, D

    R.W. Romani, D. Kandel, A.V. Filippenko, T.G. Brink, an d W. Zheng, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022) arXiv:2207.05124

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Burgio, H.J

    G.F. Burgio, H.J. Schulze, I. Vida˜ na, and J.B. Wei, Pro gress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 120, 103879 (2021) arXiv:2105.03747

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    B.A. Li, B.J. Cai, W.J. Xie, and N.B. Zhang, Universe 7, 182 (2021) arXiv:2105.04629

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Yakovlev, and C.J

    D.G. Yakovlev, and C.J. Pethick, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astr ophy. 42, 169–210 (2004) arXiv:astro- ph/0402143

    arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    D. Page, U. Geppert, and F. Weber, Nucl. Phys. A 777, 497–530 (2006) arXiv:astro-ph/0508056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Kim, C.H

    M. Kim, C.H. Lee, Y.M. Kim, K. Kwak, Y. Lim, and C.H. Hyun, International Journal of Modern Physics E 29, 2030007 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    D. Page, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer, and A.W. Steiner, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 106, 081101 (2011) arXiv:1011.6142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Shternin, D.G

    P.S. Shternin, D.G. Yakovlev, C.O. Heinke, W.C.G. Ho, a nd D.J. Patnaude, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, L108–L112 (2011) arXiv:1012.0045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [27]

    D. Page, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer, and A.W. Steiner, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2048–2051 (2000) arXiv:hep-ph/0005094

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2048

  28. [28]

    Blaschke, T

    D. Blaschke, T. Kl¨ ahn, and D.N. Voskresensky, Astroph ys. J. 533, 406–412 (2000) arXiv:astro- ph/9908334

    arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Blaschke, H

    D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, and D.N. Voskresensky, Astr on. Astrophys. 368, 561–568 (2001) arXiv:astro- ph/0009120

    arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Grigorian, D

    H. Grigorian, D. Blaschke, and D. Voskresensky, Phys. R ev. C 71, 045801 (2005) arXiv:astro- ph/0411619

    arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Noda, M.a

    T. Noda, M.a. Hashimoto, N. Yasutake, T. Maruyama, T. Ta tsumi, and M. Fujimoto, Astrophys. J. 765, 1 (2013) arXiv:1109.1080

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    Sedrakian, European Physical Journal A 52, 44 (2016) arXiv:1509.06986

    A. Sedrakian, European Physical Journal A 52, 44 (2016) arXiv:1509.06986

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Takatsuka, and R

    T. Takatsuka, and R. Tamagaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 112, 37–72 (2004) arXiv:nucl-th/0402011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Sedrakian, and J.W

    A. Sedrakian, and J.W. Clark, European Physical Journa l A 55, 167 (2019) arXiv:1802.00017

    arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094009 (2020) arXiv:1908.09360

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    T. Noda, N. Yasutake, M.a. Hashimoto, T. Maruyama, and T . Tatsumi, , Cooling of neutron stars with quark-hadron continuity, In European Physical Journal Web of Conferencesvolume 260 of European Physical Journal Web of Conferencespage 11024 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Yasutake, H

    N. Yasutake, H. Chen, T. Maruyama, and T. Tatsumi, , Fini te size effects in hadron-quark phase transition by the Dyson-Schwinger method, In Journal of Physics Conference Seriesvolume 665 of Journal of Physics Conference Seriespage 012068 (2016) arXiv:1309.1954

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Machleidt, K

    R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, and C. Elster, Phys. Rep. 149, 1–89 (1987)

    1987

  39. [39]

    Pudliner, V.R

    B.S. Pudliner, V.R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson, S.C. Pi eper, and R.B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1720– 1750 (1997) arXiv:nucl-th/9705009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  40. [40]

    Tolos, and L

    L. Tolos, and L. Fabbietti, Progress in Particle and Nuc lear Physics 112, 103770 (2020) arXiv:2002.09223

    arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Maruyama, S

    T. Maruyama, S. Chiba, H.J. Schulze, and T. Tatsumi, Phy s. Rev. D 76, 123015 (2007) arXiv:0708.3277

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    Miyatsu, M.K

    T. Miyatsu, M.K. Cheoun, and K. Saito, Astrophys. J. 813, 135 (2015) arXiv:1506.05552

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Z. Bai, H. Chen, and Y.x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023018 (2018) arXiv:1707.09535

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    P. Qin, Z. Bai, S. Wang, C. Wang, and S.x. Qin, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103009 (2023) arXiv:2301.02768

    arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Prakash, M

    M. Prakash, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer, and C.J. Pethick , Astrophys. J. Lett. 390, L77 (1992)

    1992

  46. [46]

    Takatsuka, S

    T. Takatsuka, S. Nishizaki, Y. Yamamoto, and R. Tamagak i, Progress of Theoretical Physics 115, 355–379 (2006) arXiv:nucl-th/0601043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Heinke, P.G

    C.O. Heinke, P.G. Jonker, R. Wijnands, C.J. Deloye, and R.E. Taam, Astrophys. J. 691, 1035–1041 (2009) arXiv:0810.0497

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    H. Chen, M. Baldo, G.F. Burgio, and H.J. Schulze, Phys. R ev. D 84, 105023 (2011) arXiv:1107.2497

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Roberts, and A.G

    C.D. Roberts, and A.G. Williams, Progress in Particle a nd Nuclear Physics 33, 477–575 (1994) 17/18 arXiv:hep-ph/9403224

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  50. [50]

    Alkofer, P

    R. Alkofer, P. Watson, and H. Weigel, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094026 (2002) arXiv:hep-ph/0202053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Yasutake, T

    N. Yasutake, T. Maruyama, and T. Tatsumi, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123009 (2009) arXiv:0910.1144

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    Yasutake, T

    N. Yasutake, T. Noda, H. Sotani, T. Maruyama, and T. Tats umi, pages 63–112 (2013) arXiv:1208.0427

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Mariani, and G

    M. Mariani, and G. Lugones, arXiv e-printspage arXiv:2 308.13973 (2023) arXiv:2308.13973

    arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Abbott, R

    B.P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T.D. Abbott, F. Acernese, L. Ack ley, , K. et al. and Virgo Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018) arXiv:1805.11581

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Miller, F.K

    M.C. Miller, F.K. Lamb, A.J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. A rzoumanian, K.C. Gendreau, S. Guil- lot, W.C.G. Ho, J.M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S.M. Morsink , P.S. Ray, M.T. Wolff, C.L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Manthripragada, C.B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S . Pollard, I. Cognard, H.T. Cromar- tie, E. Fonseca, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, A. Parthasarathy, T. T. Pennucci,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Tolman, Physical Review 55, 364–373 (1939)

    R.C. Tolman, Physical Review 55, 364–373 (1939)

    1939

  57. [57]

    Oppenheimer, and G.M

    J.R. Oppenheimer, and G.M. Volkoff, Physical Review 55, 374–381 (1939)

    1939

  58. [58]

    Yakovlev, A.D

    D.G. Yakovlev, A.D. Kaminker, O.Y. Gnedin, and P. Haens el, Phys. Rep. 354, 1–155 (2001) arXiv:astro- ph/0012122

    arXiv 2001

  59. [59]

    A. Dohi, K. Nakazato, M.a. Hashimoto, M. Yasuhide, and T . Noda, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 113E01 (2019) arXiv:1910.01431

    arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    A. Dohi, H. Liu, T. Noda, and M.A. Hashimoto, Internatio nal Journal of Modern Physics E 31, 2250006 (2022) arXiv:2112.13302

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Yakovlev, and K.P

    D.G. Yakovlev, and K.P. Levenfish, Astron. Astrophys. 297, 717 (1995)

    1995

  62. [62]

    Kaplan, D.A

    D.L. Kaplan, D.A. Frail, B.M. Gaensler, E.V. Gotthelf, S.R. Kulkarni, P.O. Slane, and A. Nechita, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 153, 269–315 (2004) arXiv:astro-ph/0403313

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    Yakovlev, A.D

    D.G. Yakovlev, A.D. Kaminker, and K.P. Levenfish, Astro n. Astrophys. 343, 650–660 (1999) arXiv:astro-ph/9812366

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    Page, M.V

    D. Page, M.V. Beznogov, I. Garibay, J.M. Lattimer, M. Pr akash, and H.T. Janka, Astrophys. J. 898, 125 (2020) arXiv:2004.06078

    arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    A. Dohi, E. Greco, S. Nagataki, M. Ono, M. Miceli, S. Orla ndo, and B. Olmi, Astrophys. J. 949, 97 (2023) arXiv:2304.08418

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Iwamoto, Phys

    N. Iwamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1637–1640 (1980)

    1980

  67. [67]

    Iwamoto, Annals of Physics 141, 1–49 (1982)

    N. Iwamoto, Annals of Physics 141, 1–49 (1982)

    1982

  68. [68]

    Jaikumar, M

    P. Jaikumar, M. Prakash, and T. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063003 (2002) arXiv:astro-ph/0203088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  69. [69]

    Reddy, M

    S. Reddy, M. Sadzikowski, and M. Tachibana, Nucl. Phys. A714, 337–351 (2003) arXiv:nucl- th/0203011

    arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Kaminker, and P

    A.D. Kaminker, and P. Haensel, Acta Physica Polonica B 30, 1125–1148 (1999) arXiv:astro-ph/9908249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  71. [71]

    Tsuruta, Phys

    S. Tsuruta, Phys. Rep. 292, 1–130 (1998)

    1998

  72. [72]

    W.C.G. Ho, K.G. Elshamouty, C.O. Heinke, and A.Y. Potek hin, Phys. Rev. C 91, 015806 (2015) arXiv:1412.7759

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Thorne, Astrophys

    K.S. Thorne, Astrophys. J. 212, 825–831 (1977)

    1977

  74. [74]

    Potekhin, and G

    A.Y. Potekhin, and G. Chabrier, Astron. Astrophys. 609, A74 (2018) arXiv:1711.07662

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Fujimoto, T

    M.Y. Fujimoto, T. Hanawa, J. Iben, , I. and M.B. Richards on, Astrophys. J. 278, 813–824 (1984)

    1984

  76. [76]

    Ritter, Q.A

    A. Ritter, Q.A. Parker, F. Lykou, A.A. Zijlstra, M.A. Gu errero, and P. Le Dˆ u, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L33 (2021) arXiv:2105.12384

    arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Marino, C

    A. Marino, C. Dehman, K. Kovlakas, N. Rea, J.A. Pons, and D. Vigan` o, arXiv e-printspage arXiv:2404.05371 (2024) arXiv:2404.05371

    arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Kothes, Astron

    R. Kothes, Astron. Astrophys. 560, A18 (2013) arXiv:1307.8384

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [79]

    Allen, K

    G.E. Allen, K. Chow, T. DeLaney, M.D. Filipovi´ c, J.C. H ouck, T.G. Pannuti, and M.D. Stage, Astrophys. J. 798, 82 (2015) arXiv:1410.7435

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Camilloni, W

    F. Camilloni, W. Becker, P. Predehl, K. Dennerl, M. Frey berg, M.G.F. Mayer, and M. Sasaki, Astron. Astrophys. 673, A45 (2023) arXiv:2303.12686

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.