pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00497 · v1 · pith:C75ZPC5Wnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Dissecting the 3D chemo-dynamical structures of NGC 1381: a galaxy hosting an ancient slow bar with an accreted bulge and thick disc

Yunpeng Jin , Ling Zhu , Shude Mao , Marie Martig , Francesca Pinna , Glenn van de Ven , Yuchen Ding This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords NGC 1381slow barchemo-dynamical modelingin-situ formationex-situ formationbarred S0 galaxyFornax clusterstellar orbits
0
0 comments X

The pith

NGC 1381 hosts an ancient slow bar formed in situ with an accreted bulge, thick disc and halo

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a barred population-orbit superposition method to NGC 1381 to build 3D chemo-dynamical models from stellar orbits. It decomposes the galaxy into six components whose orbital and chemical properties are then compared. The nuclear disc, bar and thin disc turn out metal-rich, alpha-poor and old, consistent with in-situ formation in the early universe. The bulge, thick disc and halo are metal-poor, alpha-rich and younger or comparable, pointing instead to ex-situ origins through minor mergers. The bar itself is slow with a measured pattern speed of 34 km/s/kpc and corotation radius of 5.38 kpc, matching its proposed ancient formation time.

Core claim

NGC 1381 is decomposed into a dynamically warm nuclear disc (5%), a rigidly rotating BP/X-shaped bar (30%), a hot spheroidal bulge (17%), a cold thin disc (28%), a vertically extended thick disc (16%), and a hot diffuse stellar halo (5%). The first three components are metal-rich, alpha-poor and ~13 Gyr old and therefore in-situ; the latter three are metal-poor, alpha-rich and indicate ex-situ formation. The bar is slow (R=2.40) with pattern speed 34 km/s/kpc, bar length 2.24 kpc and corotation radius 5.38 kpc, consistent with early formation.

What carries the argument

barred population-orbit superposition method that assigns orbital weights to match observed kinematics and chemistry and thereby decomposes the galaxy into six distinct components

If this is right

  • The bar, nuclear disc and thin disc formed together in place more than 13 Gyr ago.
  • The thick disc and halo share a common ex-situ population with flat metallicity and [Mg/Fe] gradients.
  • The bulge shows a negative metallicity gradient, implying either dominant ex-situ origin or a mixture of in-situ and ex-situ stars.
  • The measured slow pattern speed and large R value are consistent with the bar having formed early and remained stable.
  • Minor mergers supplied the ex-situ stars that now dominate the outer components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeating the six-component decomposition on other cluster S0 galaxies could test whether slow bars are systematically ancient.
  • The accreted bulge and thick disc may be generic signatures of minor-merger activity inside the Fornax cluster environment.
  • Higher-resolution spectroscopy could tighten the in-situ versus ex-situ fractions inside the bulge.
  • The flat chemical gradients in the thick disc and halo suggest they were built from stars stripped from similar progenitor satellites.

Load-bearing premise

The barred population-orbit superposition method can uniquely recover the orbital weights, pattern speed and component fractions from the available kinematic and chemical data for NGC 1381.

What would settle it

An independent measurement of the bar pattern speed that falls well outside the range 27-38 km/s/kpc or yields a corotation radius far from 5.38 kpc would falsify the slow ancient bar identification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00497 by Francesca Pinna, Glenn van de Ven, Ling Zhu, Marie Martig, Shude Mao, Yuchen Ding, Yunpeng Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Imaging and MUSE coverage of NGC 1381 (FCC 170). The image shows the deep r-band imaging from FDS, with its major axis rotated to the x ′ -axis and its surface brightness indicated by the colour bar. The red and green squares represent the central and halo MUSE pointings from F3D, respectively. VLT Survey Telescope located at Cerro Paranal, Chile. We use the r-band deep imaging from FDS, which reaches a su… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Stellar kinematic and population maps (left panels), and their corresponding error maps (right panels) for NGC 1381. From top to bottom: Mean velocity, V; velocity dispersion, σ; third-order Gauss-Hermite coefficient, h3; fourth-order Gauss-Hermite coefficient, h4; stellar age, t; stellar metallicity, [Z/H]; and [Mg/Fe] abundance. We note that the bar and disc mentioned here are used to con￾struct the stel… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Surface brightness, stellar kinematic data, stellar population data, and best-fitting model for NGC 1381. From left to right: Observations, model fittings, and residuals. From top to bottom: Logarithmic normalised surface brightness, log Σ; mean velocity, V; velocity dispersion, σ; third￾order Gauss-Hermite coefficient, h3; fourth-order Gauss-Hermite coefficient, h4; stellar age, t; stellar metallicity, [Z… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The orbit classification criteria used in our dynamical decom￾position. Each box represents a criterion. Five properties are adopted to classify the orbits: (1) circularity, λz ; (2) time-averaged radius, R; (3) axis ratio, porb, in the x-y plane (bar’s rotating frame); (4) axis ra￾tio, qorb,0, in the x0-z plane (inertial frame); and (5) vertical height, zorb. The dynamical bar length, Rbar, and the radius… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Probability density distributions of stellar orbits in the λz–R phase space for the best-fitting model of NGC 1381. The leftmost panel shows the stellar orbit distribution for the entire galaxy. Each of the remaining three panels displays two dynamical components, separated by a vertical dashed line indicating the bar length (Rbar = 2.24 kpc): (1) the bar and thin disc; (2) the bulge and halo; and (3) the … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Analysis of corotation resonance for NGC 1381. The black solid line, red dashed line, blue dashed line, and green dotted line represent the angular velocity profile (Ω(R)), bar pattern speed (Ωp), bar length (Rbar), and corotation radius (RCR) of the best-fitting model, respec￾tively. The corresponding shaded regions indicate uncertainties calcu￾lated from models within the 1σ confidence level. The dimensi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Luminosity distributions of dynamical components in the best-fitting model of NGC 1381. From top to bottom: logarithmic surface brightness on the x-y (face-on), x-z (edge-on and bar side-on), and y-z (edge-on and bar end-on) planes, respectively. From left to right: Entire galaxy, nuclear disc, bar, thin disc, bulge, thick disc, and stellar halo. The luminosity fraction of each component is labelled in the… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Surface brightness profiles for the dynamical components in the models of NGC 1381. From left to right: the surface brightness profiles on the x-y (rxy = p x 2 + y 2 ), x-z (rxz = √ x 2 + z 2 ), and y-z (ryz = p y 2 + z 2 ) planes, respectively. The solid curves represent the best-fitting profiles of different components: nuclear disc (magenta), bar (black), bulge (red), thin disc (blue), thick disc (orang… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatial distributions of luminosity-weighted stellar ages for dynamical components in the best-fitting model of NGC 1381. The top and bottom panels show the distributions projected onto the x-y and x-z planes, respectively. From left to right: entire galaxy, nuclear disc, bar, thin disc, bulge, thick disc, and stellar halo. For each component, only pixels above specified brightness thresholds are plotted. … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Similarly to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similarly to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Luminosity-weighted mean stellar ages (left panel), stellar metallicities (middle panel), and [Mg/Fe] abundances (right panel) of different components derived from two data versions. Black represents data version A from Martig et al. (2026), red corresponds to data version B based on Pinna et al. (2019a), and blue denotes data version C from Martín-Navarro et al. (2021). To facilitate a direct comparison,… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Stellar metallicity gradients (left panel) and [Mg/Fe] abundance gradients (right panel) of different components derived from two data versions. Black represents data version A, red corresponds to data version B, and blue denotes data version C. In each panel, the x-axis labels (from left to right) represent the nuclear disc, bar, bulge, thin disc, thick disc, and stellar halo. The dots represent the valu… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We applied the barred population-orbit superposition method developed in \citet{Jin2025a,Jin2025b} to construct 3D chemo-dynamical models for the barred S0 galaxy NGC~1381 in the Fornax cluster. Based on the stellar orbits in the models, we decomposed NGC~1381 into six components: (1) a dynamically warm nuclear disc with $f_{\rm nucl}\sim5\%$; (2) a rigidly rotating, BP/X-shaped bar with $f_{\rm bar}\sim30\%$; (3) a dynamically hot, spheroidal bulge with $f_{\rm bulge}\sim17\%$; (4) a dynamically cold thin disc with $f_{\rm thin}\sim28\%$; (5) a vertically extended thick disc with $f_{\rm thick}\sim16\%$; and (6) a dynamically hot, spatially diffuse stellar halo with $f_{\rm halo}\sim5\%$. The nuclear disc, bar, and thin disc are metal-rich ($[Z/\rm H]\gtrsim0$), $\alpha$-poor ($\rm[Mg/Fe]\lesssim0.2$), and old ($\sim13\rm\,Gyr$), corresponding to in situ formation in the early Universe. The bulge, thick disc, and stellar halo are metal-poor ($[Z/\rm H]\lesssim0$), $\alpha$-rich ($\rm[Mg/Fe]\gtrsim0.2$), and younger than or comparable in age to the in situ components, suggesting their relations with ex situ formation contributed by minor mergers. The flat metallicity and [Mg/Fe] gradients in the thick disc and stellar halo indicate they are dominated by a similar population of ex situ stars. In contrast, the bulge exhibits a negative metallicity gradient ($\nabla[Z/\rm H]_{bulge}<0$) pointing to a more complex formation history: the bulge could be either predominantly ex situ or contain a non-negligible mixture of in situ and ex situ stars. Our modelling also reveals the presence of a slow bar ($\mathcal{R}=2.40_{-0.27}^{+0.54}$), with a bar pattern speed of $\rm\Omega_p=34_{-7}^{+4}\,km\,s^{-1}\,kpc^{-1}$, a bar length of $R_{\rm bar}=2.24_{-0.22}^{+0.43}\rm\,kpc$, and a corotation radius of $R_{\rm CR}=5.38_{-0.28}^{+1.59}\rm\,kpc$, which is consistent with its ancient formation time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper applies the barred population-orbit superposition method from Jin2025a and Jin2025b to NGC 1381, decomposing the galaxy into six chemo-dynamical components (nuclear disc ~5%, bar ~30%, bulge ~17%, thin disc ~28%, thick disc ~16%, halo ~5%) with associated metallicities, [Mg/Fe], ages, and formation channels (in-situ for nuclear disc/bar/thin disc; ex-situ for bulge/thick disc/halo). It also reports a slow bar with R=2.40, Omega_p=34 km/s/kpc, R_bar=2.24 kpc, and R_CR=5.38 kpc, consistent with ancient formation.

Significance. If robust, the work provides a detailed 3D chemo-dynamical decomposition of a cluster S0 galaxy that links specific orbital populations to in-situ versus accreted origins and constrains bar dynamics, offering quantitative fractions and gradients that can be compared to simulations of galaxy assembly.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and modeling description: the six-component decomposition, in-situ/ex-situ assignments, and bar parameters (R=2.40_{-0.27}^{+0.54}, Omega_p=34_{-7}^{+4} km/s/kpc) rest on the assumption that the barred population-orbit superposition method uniquely recovers orbital weights, pattern speed, and fractions from the available kinematic+chemical data. No mock-data recovery tests, multiple converged solutions, or posterior widths on Omega_p are described to address known degeneracies when jointly fitting potential, viewing angle, and abundance distributions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Component fractions are given only as approximate values (~5%, ~30%, etc.) without accompanying uncertainties or a dedicated table summarizing all six components' properties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for acknowledging the potential significance of our work. We address the major comment on the robustness of the decomposition and bar parameters below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and modeling description: the six-component decomposition, in-situ/ex-situ assignments, and bar parameters (R=2.40_{-0.27}^{+0.54}, Omega_p=34_{-7}^{+4} km/s/kpc) rest on the assumption that the barred population-orbit superposition method uniquely recovers orbital weights, pattern speed, and fractions from the available kinematic+chemical data. No mock-data recovery tests, multiple converged solutions, or posterior widths on Omega_p are described to address known degeneracies when jointly fitting potential, viewing angle, and abundance distributions.

    Authors: The barred population-orbit superposition method was developed and validated in our companion papers (Jin et al. 2025a,b), which include extensive mock-data recovery tests demonstrating reliable recovery of orbital weights, pattern speeds, component fractions, and handling of degeneracies in the joint fit of potential, viewing angle, and abundance distributions. Those works also explore multiple converged solutions and report posterior information. The present manuscript applies the validated method to NGC 1381 and provides uncertainties on Ω_p (and other bar parameters) from the fitting procedure. To directly address the referee’s concern, we will revise the Methods section to include a concise summary of the key validation results and degeneracy mitigation from Jin et al. (2025a,b), and we will clarify how the chemical constraints help reduce degeneracies. The reported asymmetric errors on Ω_p already reflect the range of acceptable models. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central decomposition and slow-bar parameters rest on uniqueness of self-cited orbit-superposition method

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We applied the barred population-orbit superposition method developed in \citet{Jin2025a,Jin2025b} to construct 3D chemo-dynamical models for the barred S0 galaxy NGC~1381 in the Fornax cluster. Based on the stellar orbits in the models, we decomposed NGC~1381 into six components: (1) a dynamically warm nuclear disc with $f_{\rm nucl}\sim5\%$; (2) a rigidly rotating, BP/X-shaped bar with $f_{\rm bar}\sim30\%$; ... Our modelling also reveals the presence of a slow bar (\mathcal{R}=2.40_{-0.27}^{+0.54}), with a bar pattern speed of \rm\Omega_p=34_{-7}^{+4}\,km\,s^{-1}\,kpc^{-1}..."

    All reported quantities (component fractions, formation channels, R, Omega_p, R_CR) are outputs of the cited method. The paper supplies no separate demonstration that the method uniquely recovers these quantities from the NGC 1381 kinematic+chemical data; uniqueness is imported solely via the self-citation to Jin2025a/Jin2025b.

full rationale

The paper's derivation applies the barred population-orbit superposition method from Jin2025a/Jin2025b to NGC 1381 data, then reports six-component fractions, in-situ/ex-situ assignments, and bar parameters (R=2.40, Omega_p=34 km/s/kpc) as direct outputs. No independent test of uniqueness or degeneracy breaking for this dataset is provided; the load-bearing premise that the method recovers unique orbital weights, pattern speed, and fractions therefore reduces to the self-citation. This produces partial circularity while the data application itself remains new.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of the orbit-superposition method and on the interpretation of chemical abundances as formation tracers; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • component mass fractions
    f_nucl, f_bar, f_bulge, f_thin, f_thick, f_halo are adjusted to match observed kinematics and chemistry.
  • bar pattern speed and length
    Omega_p, R_bar and R_CR are fitted quantities reported with uncertainties.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar orbits can be linearly superposed to reproduce the observed line-of-sight velocity distributions and chemical maps.
    Invoked when the method from Jin2025a,b is applied to NGC 1381.
  • domain assumption Metal-rich, alpha-poor, old populations trace in-situ formation while metal-poor, alpha-rich populations trace ex-situ accretion.
    Used to assign formation histories to the six components.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6063 in / 1530 out tokens · 24042 ms · 2026-07-02T09:25:11.525335+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 139 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aguerri, J. A. L., M \'e ndez-Abreu, J., Falc \'o n-Barroso, J., et al. 2015, , 576, A102

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    1992 a , , 259, 345

    Athanassoula, E. 1992 a , , 259, 345

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    1992 b , , 259, 328

    Athanassoula, E. 1992 b , , 259, 328

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    2003, , 341, 1179

    Athanassoula, E. 2003, , 341, 1179

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    2005, , 358, 1477

    Athanassoula, E. 2005, , 358, 1477

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 773508

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    2017, , 608, A1

    Bacon, R., Conseil, S., Mary, D., et al. 2017, , 608, A1

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    2001, , 326, 23

    Bacon, R., Copin, Y., Monnet, G., et al. 2001, , 326, 23

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    A., Marshall, P

    Barnab \`e , M., Dutton, A. A., Marshall, P. J., et al. 2012, , 423, 1073

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    & Tremaine, S

    Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    P., Jord \'a n, A., Mei, S., et al

    Blakeslee, J. P., Jord \'a n, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, , 694, 556

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    G., & Elmegreen, D

    Bournaud, F., Elmegreen, B. G., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2007, , 670, 237

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    2020, , 640, A20

    Breda, I., Papaderos, P., & Gomes, J.-M. 2020, , 640, A20

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    J., Owers, M

    Bryant, J. J., Owers, M. S., Robotham, A. S. G., et al. 2015, , 447, 2857

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    A., Law, D

    Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, , 798, 7

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    2006, , 370, 753

    Bureau, M., Aronica, G., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2006, , 370, 753

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    & Athanassoula, E

    Bureau, M. & Athanassoula, E. 2005, , 626, 159

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    J., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., et al

    Buta, R. J., Sheth, K., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2015, , 217, 32

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Buta, R. J. & Zhang, X. 2009, , 182, 559

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    M., Cuomo, V., et al

    Buttitta, C., Corsini, E. M., Cuomo, V., et al. 2022, , 664, L10

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    2002, , 333, 400

    Cappellari, M. 2002, , 333, 400

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    2017, , 466, 798

    Cappellari, M. 2017, , 466, 798

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    & Copin, Y

    Cappellari, M. & Copin, Y. 2003, , 342, 345

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    & Emsellem, E

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. 2004, , 116, 138

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    2011, , 413, 813

    Cappellari, M., Emsellem, E., Krajnovi \'c , D., et al. 2011, , 413, 813

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    2013, , 432, 1709

    Cappellari, M., Scott, N., Alatalo, K., et al. 2013, , 432, 1709

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    & Hernandez, O

    Chemin, L. & Hernandez, O. 2009, , 499, L25

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    & Bureau, M

    Chung, A. & Bureau, M. 2004, , 127, 3192

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    & Mertzanides, C

    Contopoulos, G. & Mertzanides, C. 1977, , 61, 477

    work page 1977

  30. [30]

    A., Schaye, J., Clauwens, B., et al

    Correa, C. A., Schaye, J., Clauwens, B., et al. 2017, , 472, L45

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    A., Abadi, M

    Cristiani, V. A., Abadi, M. G., Taverna, A., et al. 2024, , 692, A63

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Cuomo, V., Aguerri, J. A. L., Corsini, E. M., & Debattista, V. P. 2020, , 641, A111

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    2024, , 530, 1195

    Dattathri, S., Valluri, M., Vasiliev, E., Wheeler, V., & Erwin, P. 2024, , 530, 1195

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    A., et al

    de S \'a -Freitas, C., Fragkoudi, F., Gadotti, D. A., et al. 2023, , 671, A8

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    A., Fragkoudi, F., et al

    de S \'a -Freitas, C., Gadotti, D. A., Fragkoudi, F., et al. 2025, , 698, A5

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Debattista, V. P. & Sellwood, J. A. 2000, , 543, 704

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    2023, , 672, A84

    Ding, Y., Zhu, L., van de Ven, G., et al. 2023, , 672, A84

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    J., Gregg, M

    Drinkwater, M. J., Gregg, M. D., & Colless, M. 2001, , 548, L139

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    C., Debattista, V

    Du, M., Ho, L. C., Debattista, V. P., et al. 2020, , 895, 139

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    C., Zhao, D., et al

    Du, M., Ho, L. C., Zhao, D., et al. 2019, , 884, 129

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    1982, , 199, 1069

    Efstathiou, G., Lake, G., & Negroponte, J. 1982, , 199, 1069

    work page 1982

  42. [42]

    1994, , 285, 723

    Emsellem, E., Monnet, G., & Bacon, R. 1994, , 285, 723

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    & Debattista, V

    Erwin, P. & Debattista, V. P. 2017, , 468, 2058

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    P., et al

    Erwin, P., Seth, A., Debattista, V. P., et al. 2021, , 502, 2446

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Ferguson, H. C. 1989, , 98, 367

    work page 1989

  46. [46]

    Fisher, D. B. & Drory, N. 2008, , 136, 773

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    A., et al

    Fraser-McKelvie, A., van de Sande, J., Gadotti, D. A., et al. 2025, , 700, A237

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Gadotti, D. A. 2009, , 393, 1531

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Gadotti, D. A. 2011, , 415, 3308

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Gadotti, D. A. 2026, , 545, staf2072

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    A., Bittner, A., Falc \'o n-Barroso, J., et al

    Gadotti, D. A., Bittner, A., Falc \'o n-Barroso, J., et al. 2020, , 643, A14

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    2022, , 517, 5660

    Garma-Oehmichen, L., Hern \'a ndez-Toledo, H., Aquino-Ort \' z, E., et al. 2022, , 517, 5660

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Gerhard, O. E. 1993, , 265, 213

    work page 1993

  54. [54]

    Grand, R. J. J., Fragkoudi, F., G \'o mez, F. A., et al. 2024, , 532, 1814

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Grand, R. J. J., G \'o mez, F. A., Marinacci, F., et al. 2017, , 467, 179

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    2019, , 482, 1733

    Guo, R., Mao, S., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2019, , 482, 1733

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    2025, , 985, 181

    Guo, Y., Jogee, S., Wise, E., et al. 2025, , 985, 181

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    2024, , 691, A122

    Habibi, A., Roshan, M., Hosseinirad, M., et al. 2024, , 691, A122

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    H., et al

    Helmi, A., Babusiaux, C., Koppelman, H. H., et al. 2018, , 563, 85

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    1971, , 168, 343

    Hohl, F. 1971, , 168, 343

    work page 1971

  61. [61]

    F., Bundy, K., Croton, D., et al

    Hopkins, P. F., Bundy, K., Croton, D., et al. 2010, , 715, 202

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    2016, , 820, 42

    Iodice, E., Capaccioli, M., Grado, A., et al. 2016, , 820, 42

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    2019b, , 627, A136

    Iodice, E., Sarzi, M., Bittner, A., et al. 2019b, , 627, A136

    work page

  64. [64]

    2019a, , 623, A1

    Iodice, E., Spavone, M., Capaccioli, M., et al. 2019a, , 623, A1

    work page

  65. [65]

    2020, DYNAMITE: DYnamics, Age and Metallicity Indicators Tracing Evolution, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2011.007

    Jethwa, P., Thater, S., Maindl, T., & Van de Ven, G. 2020, DYNAMITE: DYnamics, Age and Metallicity Indicators Tracing Evolution, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2011.007

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    J., et al

    Jin, Y., Zhu, L., Long, R. J., et al. 2020, , 491, 1690

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    J., et al

    Jin, Y., Zhu, L., Long, R. J., et al. 2019, , 486, 4753

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    2025b, , 704, A262

    Jin, Y., Zhu, L., Tahmasebzadeh, B., et al. 2025b, , 704, A262

    work page

  69. [69]

    2025a, , 700, A249

    Jin, Y., Zhu, L., Tahmasebzadeh, B., et al. 2025a, , 700, A249

    work page

  70. [70]

    2024, , 681, A95

    Jin, Y., Zhu, L., Zibetti, S., et al. 2024, , 681, A95

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    & Kennicutt, Robert C., J

    Kormendy, J. & Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 2004, , 42, 603

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    2001, , 322, 231

    Kroupa, P. 2001, , 322, 231

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Lawson, C. L. & Hanson, R. J. 1974, Solving least squares problems

    work page 1974

  74. [74]

    A., Gadotti, D

    Le Conte, Z. A., Gadotti, D. A., Ferreira, L., et al. 2024, , 530, 1984

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    H., Hwang, H

    Lee, Y. H., Hwang, H. S., Cuomo, V., et al. 2025, , 989, 55

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    D., Di Matteo, P., Haywood, M., & Snaith, O

    Lehnert, M. D., Di Matteo, P., Haywood, M., & Snaith, O. N. 2014, , 789, L30

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    C., & Barth, A

    Li, Z.-Y., Ho, L. C., & Barth, A. J. 2017, , 845, 87

    work page 2017

  78. [78]

    2018, , 854, 65

    Li, Z.-Y., Shen, J., Bureau, M., et al. 2018, , 854, 65

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    okas, E. L. 2018, , 857, 6

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Long, R. J. & Mao, S. 2018, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 18, 145

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.