pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00866 · v1 · pith:PJ23VEBMnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Dissipative hydrodynamic actions and horizon symmetries in gravity

Mike Blake , Arpit Das , Richard A. Davison This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords holographic hydrodynamicsSchwinger-Keldysh formalismblack hole horizondissipative actionhorizon symmetriesAdS gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relative diffeomorphisms between a black hole horizon and asymptotic boundaries produce a dissipative hydrodynamic action for holographic thermal stress tensors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a prescription to compute a dissipative action for the large-scale thermal stress tensor dynamics of a holographic quantum field theory dual to AdS4 gravity. The construction uses the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and applies to quadratic order in perturbations around thermal equilibrium. Hydrodynamic degrees of freedom are realized in gravity through relative diffeomorphisms involving the black hole horizon and the two boundaries of the contour. Explicit computation of the action to first order in derivatives reproduces the known hydrodynamic Green's functions. The prescription also requires a choice of horizon boundary conditions and examines the symmetries that preserve them.

Core claim

A dissipative hydrodynamic action arises from relative diffeomorphisms between the black hole horizon and the two asymptotic boundaries of the Schwinger-Keldysh contour, and explicit evaluation to first order in derivatives yields an action that matches known hydrodynamic Green's functions for the thermal stress tensor in AdS4 gravity.

What carries the argument

Relative diffeomorphisms between the black hole horizon and the two asymptotic boundaries of the Crossley-Glorioso-Liu contour, which realize the hydrodynamical degrees of freedom.

If this is right

  • The resulting action correctly reproduces known hydrodynamic Green's functions to first order in derivatives.
  • Horizon symmetries that preserve the chosen boundary conditions are identified and connected to conjectured hydrodynamic symmetries for many-body quantum chaos.
  • The prescription applies at quadratic order in perturbations about the thermal equilibrium state.
  • A choice of horizon boundary conditions for the metric is required to define the action.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the horizon diffeomorphism identification extends beyond first order, the method could generate higher-derivative terms in the dissipative action directly from gravity.
  • The link between horizon symmetries and quantum chaos symmetries suggests a possible gravitational origin for effective descriptions of many-body scrambling.
  • Applying the same contour construction in other dimensions or with different horizon topologies could test whether the mapping is universal.

Load-bearing premise

The hydrodynamical degrees of freedom of the action must be realized in gravity as relative diffeomorphisms between the black hole horizon and the two asymptotic boundaries of the contour.

What would settle it

If the action computed to first order in derivatives fails to reproduce the known hydrodynamic Green's functions for the thermal stress tensor, the prescription would not hold.

read the original abstract

We give a prescription to compute a dissipative action describing the large-scale thermal stress tensor dynamics of a holographic quantum field theory dual to AdS$_4$ gravity, in the context of the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Our prescription is valid to quadratic order in perturbations about the thermal equilibrium state. The hydrodynamical degrees of freedom of this action are realised in gravity as relative diffeomorphisms between the black hole horizon and the two asymptotic boundaries of the Crossley-Glorioso-Liu contour. We explicitly compute the action to first order in derivatives, and confirm it correctly reproduces the known hydrodynamic Green's functions. Our prescription requires a choice of horizon boundary conditions for the metric. We study the horizon symmetries that preserve these, and their relation to conjectured hydrodynamic symmetries responsible for many-body quantum chaos.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a prescription, valid to quadratic order in perturbations, for computing a dissipative action in the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism that describes the large-scale thermal stress-tensor dynamics of a holographic QFT dual to AdS4 gravity. Hydrodynamic degrees of freedom are realized as relative diffeomorphisms between the black-hole horizon and the two asymptotic boundaries on the Crossley-Glorioso-Liu contour. The action is computed explicitly to first order in derivatives and is shown to reproduce known hydrodynamic Green's functions. The work also examines the horizon symmetries that preserve the chosen boundary conditions and relates them to conjectured hydrodynamic symmetries associated with many-body quantum chaos.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the explicit first-order computation together with the direct match to known Green's functions constitutes a non-trivial internal consistency check on the gravity-to-hydrodynamics dictionary in the Schwinger-Keldysh setting. The explicit realization of hydrodynamic modes via relative diffeomorphisms and the study of horizon symmetries provide a concrete link between gravitational boundary conditions and dissipative hydrodynamics, which could be useful for further work on holographic chaos and out-of-equilibrium dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [prescription and horizon boundary conditions (abstract and relevant computation section)] The prescription requires a specific choice of horizon boundary conditions, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that this choice is fixed by the requirement to reproduce the Green's functions rather than being selected to achieve the match. A concrete test (e.g., showing that a different admissible choice yields an action whose Green's functions deviate from the known hydrodynamic results) would be needed to establish that the mapping is not post-hoc.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the relative diffeomorphisms and the CGL contour could be introduced more explicitly in the main text for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [horizon symmetries discussion] The relation between the computed action and the conjectured hydrodynamic symmetries is stated but would benefit from a short table or equation summarizing which symmetries are preserved and which are broken at first order.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the justification for the horizon boundary conditions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [prescription and horizon boundary conditions (abstract and relevant computation section)] The prescription requires a specific choice of horizon boundary conditions, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that this choice is fixed by the requirement to reproduce the Green's functions rather than being selected to achieve the match. A concrete test (e.g., showing that a different admissible choice yields an action whose Green's functions deviate from the known hydrodynamic results) would be needed to establish that the mapping is not post-hoc.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The choice of horizon boundary conditions is an integral part of the prescription, selected so that relative diffeomorphisms between the horizon and the asymptotic boundaries on the Crossley-Glorioso-Liu contour generate precisely the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom while respecting the standard ingoing conditions at the horizon. This choice is additionally constrained by the requirement that the preserved horizon symmetries match the conjectured symmetries associated with many-body quantum chaos, as analyzed in the manuscript. The explicit reproduction of the known hydrodynamic Green's functions to first order in derivatives constitutes a non-trivial consistency check. We agree that further clarification would be valuable and will revise the relevant computation section to expand on these physical and symmetry-based motivations. While performing a complete recomputation for an alternative admissible choice lies outside the present scope, the symmetry analysis already shows that other choices would alter the preserved horizon symmetries and thereby fail to produce the correct hydrodynamic action. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents an explicit prescription realizing hydrodynamical modes as relative diffeomorphisms on the CGL contour, computes the dissipative action to first order in derivatives, and verifies that the resulting Green's functions match known hydrodynamic results. This match serves as an external consistency check on the mapping rather than a fitted or self-referential prediction. The mention of horizon symmetries and their relation to conjectured hydrodynamic symmetries is peripheral and does not bear the load of the central derivation or computation. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains are present in the described chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the AdS/CFT correspondence and the Schwinger-Keldysh contour construction; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps gravity in AdS4 to a boundary QFT
    Invoked to equate the gravitational action with the dissipative hydrodynamic action of the dual field theory.
  • domain assumption Schwinger-Keldysh contour correctly captures real-time dissipative dynamics
    Used to define the contour whose boundaries are linked to the horizon by diffeomorphisms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1431 out tokens · 32168 ms · 2026-07-02T09:18:48.825472+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 38 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories

    P. Kovtun,Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories, J. Phys. A45 (2012) 473001, [arXiv:1205.5040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Effective field theory of dissipative fluids

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids, JHEP09 (2017) 095, [arXiv:1511.03646]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory

    S. Grozdanov and J. Polonyi,Viscosity and dissipative hydrodynamics from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 10 105031, [arXiv:1305.3670]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani,The Fluid Manifesto: Emergent symmetries, hydrodynamics, and black holes, JHEP01(2016) 184, [arXiv:1510.02494]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani,Two roads to hydrodynamic effective actions: a comparison,arXiv:1701.07896

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace

    K. Jensen, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, and A. Yarom,Dissipative hydrodynamics in superspace, JHEP09(2018) 127, [arXiv:1701.07436]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, PoST ASI2017(2018) 008, [arXiv:1805.09331]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    L. V. Delacretaz,Boulder Lectures on Thermal Dynamics and Hydrodynamic EFTs, 6, 2026. arXiv:2606.02391

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    All-order fluctuating hydrodynamics of the SYK lattice

    M. Bucca, A. Jain, M. Mezei, and A. Milekhin,All-order fluctuating hydrodynamics of the SYK lattice,arXiv:2604.18675

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani,Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP02(2008) 045, [arXiv:0712.2456]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla, S. Nampuri, S. P. Trivedi, and S. R. Wadia,Forced Fluid Dynamics from Gravity, JHEP02(2009) 018, [arXiv:0806.0006]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Hydrodynamics from charged black branes

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Dutta, R. Loganayagam, and P. Surowka, Hydrodynamics from charged black branes, JHEP01(2011) 094, [arXiv:0809.2596]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes

    J. Erdmenger, M. Haack, M. Kaminski, and A. Yarom,Fluid dynamics of R-charged black holes, JHEP01(2009) 055, [arXiv:0809.2488]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla, and M. Rangamani,The fluid/gravity correspondence, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: – 50 – String theory and its Applications: From meV to the Planck Scale, pp. 348–383, 2012. arXiv:1107.5780

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    A prescription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu,A prescription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems,arXiv:1812.08785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories

    J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva,Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories, JHEP05(2019) 188, [arXiv:1812.06093]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Haehl and M

    F. Haehl and M. Rangamani,Schwinger–Keldysh Formalism, Lect. Notes Phys.1041(2025) 89–129

    2025

  18. [18]

    M. J. Landry,The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems, JHEP07(2020) 200, [arXiv:1912.12301]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Iqbal and N

    N. Iqbal and N. Poovuttikul,2-group global symmetries, hydrodynamics and holography, SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 2 063, [arXiv:2010.00320]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Loganayagam, K

    R. Loganayagam, K. Ray, and A. Sivakumar,Fermionic Open EFT from Holography, arXiv:2011.07039

    work page arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Loganayagam, K

    R. Loganayagam, K. Ray, S. K. Sharma, and A. Sivakumar,Holographic KMS relations at finite density, JHEP03(2021) 233, [arXiv:2011.08173]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Y. Bu, M. Fujita, and S. Lin,Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuating holographic superconductor, JHEP09(2021) 168, [arXiv:2106.00556]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Bu and B

    Y. Bu and B. Zhang,Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for a relativistic Brownian particle in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 8 086002, [arXiv:2108.10060]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Y. Bu, X. Sun, and B. Zhang,Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh field theory of SU(2) diffusion, JHEP08(2022) 223, [arXiv:2205.00195]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    J. K. Ghosh and M. A. Momen,An effective theory of anomalous charge diffusion from holography, Nucl. Phys. B1005(2024) 116585, [arXiv:2208.04992]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and V. Ziogas,U(1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography, JHEP09(2023) 019, [arXiv:2304.14173]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Rangamani, J

    M. Rangamani, J. Virrueta, and S. Zhou,Anomalous hydrodynamics effective actions from holography, JHEP11(2023) 044, [arXiv:2306.01055]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon, and R. Penco,The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction, JHEP06 (2024) 004, [arXiv:2306.17232]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Martin and S

    G. Martin and S. K. Sharma,Open EFT for Interacting Fermions from Holography, arXiv:2403.10604

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and X. Sun,Chiral anomalous magnetohydrodynamics in action: effective field theory and holography, JHEP04(2025) 126, [arXiv:2412.02361]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Bu and Z

    Y. Bu and Z. Yang,Chiral phase transition: Effective field theory and holography, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 12 126004, [arXiv:2412.08882]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Ammon, J

    M. Ammon, J. Germerodt, C. Sieling, and J. Virrueta,A holographic prescription for generalized Schwinger-Keldysh contours, JHEP05(2026) 246, [arXiv:2510.03404]

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Effective Field Theory for Superconducting Phase Transitions

    Y. Bu and Z. Yang,Effective Field Theory for Superconducting Phase Transitions, arXiv:2604.02133. – 51 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Deconstructing holographic liquids

    D. Nickel and D. T. Son,Deconstructing holographic liquids, New J. Phys.13(2011) 075010, [arXiv:1009.3094]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, and Y. Wang,Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography, JHEP02(2016) 124, [arXiv:1504.07611]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Effective actions for relativistic fluids from holography

    J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva,Effective actions for relativistic fluids from holography, JHEP08(2015) 086, [arXiv:1504.07616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Chaos in AdS$_2$ holography

    K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 11 111601, [arXiv:1605.06098]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP2016(2016), no. 12 12C104, [arXiv:1606.01857]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    An Investigation of AdS$_2$ Backreaction and Holography

    J. Engels¨ oy, T. G. Mertens, and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography, JHEP07(2016) 139, [arXiv:1606.03438]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    A theory of reparameterizations for AdS$_3$ gravity

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,A theory of reparameterizations for AdS 3 gravity, JHEP02(2019) 079, [arXiv:1808.03263]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Blake, A

    M. Blake, A. Das, and R. A. Davison,Horizon symmetries of exact hydrodynamic actions,to appear

  42. [42]

    A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos

    M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu,A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos, JHEP10(2018) 127, [arXiv:1801.00010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Blake and H

    M. Blake and H. Liu,On systems of maximal quantum chaos, JHEP05(2021) 229, [arXiv:2102.11294]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Knysh, H

    M. Knysh, H. Liu, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva,New horizon symmetries, hydrodynamics, and quantum chaos,arXiv:2405.17559

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    C. Jana, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani,Open quantum systems and Schwinger-Keldysh holograms, JHEP07(2020) 242, [arXiv:2004.02888]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    J. K. Ghosh, R. Loganayagam, S. G. Prabhu, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar, and V. Vishal, Effective field theory of stochastic diffusion from gravity, JHEP05(2021) 130, [arXiv:2012.03999]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta,An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography, JHEP01(2022) 145, [arXiv:2108.03244]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar, and J. Virrueta,The timbre of Hawking gravitons: an effective description of energy transport from holography, JHEP09 (2022) 092, [arXiv:2202.04079]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta,An effective description of charge diffusion and energy transport in a charged plasma from holography, JHEP03(2023) 161, [arXiv:2205.03415]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Loganayagam, M

    R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta,Holographic open quantum systems: toy models and analytic properties of thermal correlators, JHEP03(2023) 153, [arXiv:2211.07683]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Loganayagam, M

    R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta,Holographic thermal correlators: a tale of Fuchsian ODEs and integration contours, JHEP07(2023) 008, [arXiv:2212.13940]. – 52 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Bu and X

    Y. Bu and X. Sun,Holographic derivation of effective action for a dissipative neutral fluid, JHEP08(2025) 117, [arXiv:2503.03374]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Holographic Reconstruction of Spacetime and Renormalization in the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis,Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595–622, [hep-th/0002230]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  54. [54]

    C. P. Herzog,The Hydrodynamics of M theory, JHEP12(2002) 026, [hep-th/0210126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  55. [55]

    C. P. Herzog,The Sound of M theory, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 024013, [hep-th/0302086]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Supertranslations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonzalez, and M. Pino,Supertranslations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 9 091101, [arXiv:1511.08687]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Extended Symmetries at the Black Hole Horizon

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonz´ alez, and M. Pino,Extended Symmetries at the Black Hole Horizon, JHEP09(2016) 100, [arXiv:1607.05703]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Chandrasekaran, É.É

    V. Chandrasekaran, ´E. ´E. Flanagan, and K. Prabhu,Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries, JHEP11(2018) 125, [arXiv:1807.11499]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 224 (2023)]

    work page arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Marjieh, N

    R. Marjieh, N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, B. Tavor, and A. Yarom,Black Hole Supertranslations and Hydrodynamic Enstrophy, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 24 241602, [arXiv:2111.00544]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov, and H. Liu,Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography, JHEP10(2018) 035, [arXiv:1809.01169]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Y. Bu, T. Demircik, and M. Lublinsky,All order effective action for charge diffusion from Schwinger-Keldysh holography, JHEP05(2021) 187, [arXiv:2012.08362]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Momentum relaxation from the fluid/gravity correspondence

    M. Blake,Momentum relaxation from the fluid/gravity correspondence, JHEP09(2015) 010, [arXiv:1505.06992]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Magnetotransport from the fluid/gravity correspondence

    M. Blake,Magnetotransport from the fluid/gravity correspondence, JHEP10(2015) 078, [arXiv:1507.04870]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Shear viscosity in holography and effective theory of transport without translational symmetry

    P. Burikham and N. Poovuttikul,Shear viscosity in holography and effective theory of transport without translational symmetry, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 10 106001, [arXiv:1601.04624]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Gout´ eraux and A

    B. Gout´ eraux and A. Shukla,Beyond Drude transport in hydrodynamic metals, Phys. Rev. B 109(2024), no. 16 165153, [arXiv:2309.04033]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    D. Gu, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang,Spontaneous symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: Strong, weak, and strong-to-weak, Phys. Rev. B112(2025), no. 24 245123, [arXiv:2406.19381]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Ogunnaike, J

    O. Ogunnaike, J. Feldmeier, and J. Y. Lee,Unifying Emergent Hydrodynamics and Lindbladian Low-Energy Spectra across Symmetries, Constraints, and Long-Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 22 220403, [arXiv:2304.13028]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Huang, M

    X. Huang, M. Qi, J.-H. Zhang, and A. Lucas,Hydrodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B111(2025), no. 12 125147, [arXiv:2407.08760]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Schwinger-Keldysh effective theory of charge transport: redundancies and systematic $\omega/T$ expansion

    E. Firat, A. Gomes, F. Nardi, R. Penco, and R. Rattazzi,Schwinger-Keldysh effective theory of charge transport: redundancies and systematicω/T expansion, JHEP05(2026) 079, [arXiv:2508.18346]. – 53 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Are´ an, D

    D. Are´ an, D. G. Fari˜ na, and K. Landsteiner,Pseudospectra of holographic quasinormal modes, JHEP12(2023) 187, [arXiv:2307.08751]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Real-time gauge/gravity duality

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees,Real-time gauge/gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 081601, [arXiv:0805.0150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  72. [72]

    Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees,Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples, JHEP05(2009) 085, [arXiv:0812.2909]. – 54 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009