pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01076 · v1 · pith:TRBENCB3new · submitted 2026-07-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Universal Short-Imaginary-Time Quantum Critical Dynamics Near Boundaries

Yu-Rong Shu , Yuan-Biao Li , Shuai Yin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 04:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords boundary criticalityquantum critical dynamicsimaginary time evolutionIsing modelscaling exponentsinitial slipordinary transitionspecial transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Short-imaginary-time quantum critical dynamics near boundaries follow scaling forms set by static boundary universality classes

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a universal scaling theory for the short-imaginary-time regime of quantum critical dynamics near boundaries. For ordered initial states the boundary order parameter decays as a power law set by the boundary exponent β1. For disordered initial states a new exponent θ1 governs the autocorrelation and is tied to an initial-slip exponent θ1' that changes sign between ordinary and special transitions. The theory is checked in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model. Sympathetic readers care because imaginary-time evolution is widely used for ground-state preparation, so understanding its boundary dynamics opens a route to probe exotic boundary criticality without following the usual quantum-to-classical mapping.

Core claim

A universal scaling theory is developed for short-imaginary-time critical dynamics in quantum systems with boundaries and verified in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model. For ordered initial states, the boundary order parameter Ms decays with imaginary time τ as Ms ∝ τ^{-β1/νz}. For disordered initial states, the autocorrelation of the boundary order parameter is governed by a novel critical exponent θ1, which is closely related to the critical initial slip behavior of Ms characterized by the corresponding exponent θ1'. In contrast to its positive bulk counterpart, the boundary initial-slip exponent θ1' is negative for the ordinary transition while remaining positive for the special tran

What carries the argument

Scaling forms for short imaginary time τ based on boundary universality classes (ordinary versus special transition), with the boundary order parameter exponent β1 and the new boundary initial-slip exponent θ1'

If this is right

  • The boundary order parameter decays as Ms ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} when starting from ordered states.
  • Autocorrelation of the boundary order parameter follows a power law set by the novel exponent θ1 when starting from disordered states.
  • The boundary initial-slip exponent θ1' is negative at the ordinary transition and positive at the special transition.
  • The exponent θ1 breaks the conventional quantum-classical mapping that holds for static classes.
  • These scalings extend to more exotic forms of boundary criticality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scaling holds in other models, it could provide a practical way to extract boundary exponents from short-time imaginary-time simulations on quantum devices.
  • The sign change in θ1' between transitions suggests that boundary effects can either suppress or enhance initial correlations depending on the surface universality class.
  • Testing the theory in three-dimensional quantum systems would check whether the departure from quantum-classical mapping persists beyond the Ising case.

Load-bearing premise

The short-imaginary-time regime is assumed to be governed by the static boundary universality classes without significant corrections from non-universal microscopic details or higher-order irrelevant operators.

What would settle it

A numerical calculation in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model showing that the boundary order parameter decay deviates from the predicted power law Ms ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} for ordered initial states at short imaginary times would falsify the universal scaling theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01076 by Shuai Yin, Yuan-Biao Li, Yu-Rong Shu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While imaginary-time evolution has long served as a standard paradigm for ground-state preparation in numerical simulations and quantum devices, its intrinsic dynamical properties has been largely overlooked. Here, we investigate the short-imaginary-time critical dynamics in quantum systems with boundaries. A universal scaling theory is developed and verified in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model, uncovering rich dynamic critical behaviors dictated by boundary universality classes. For ordered initial states, the boundary order parameter $M_s$ decays with imaginary time $\tau$ as $M_s \propto \tau^{-\beta_1/\nu z}$, where $\beta_1$ denotes the boundary order parameter exponent, and $\nu$ and $z$ correspond to the correlation length exponent and the dynamic exponent, respectively. For disordered initial states, the autocorrelation of the boundary order parameter is governed by a novel critical exponent $\theta_1$, which is closely related to the critical initial slip behavior of $M_s$ characterized by the corresponding exponent $\theta_1'$. In contrast to its positive bulk counterpart, the boundary initial-slip exponent $\theta_1'$ is negative for the ordinary transition while remaining positive for the special transition. Although the static universality classes of $d$-dimensional quantum phase transitions generally coincide with those of $(d+1)$-dimensional classical phase transitions, we show that $\theta_1$ does not follow this conventional quantum-classical mapping. We further discuss the implications of our results for more exotic forms of boundary criticality. Our findings provide new physical insights into boundary critical dynamics and offer a novel route for probing exotic boundary critical behaviors in quantum many-body systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a universal scaling theory for short-imaginary-time critical dynamics near boundaries in quantum critical systems. For ordered initial states the boundary order parameter decays as Ms ∝ τ^{-β1/νz}; for disordered initial states the boundary autocorrelation is controlled by a new exponent θ1 (related to the initial-slip exponent θ1'). The work reports that θ1' is negative at the ordinary transition and positive at the special transition, that θ1 violates the conventional quantum-classical mapping, and that these behaviors are verified numerically in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model. Implications for exotic boundary criticality are discussed.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the results supply a new dynamical probe of boundary universality classes in imaginary time, with direct relevance to ground-state preparation protocols on quantum devices and in tensor-network simulations. The construction of distinct scaling forms for ordinary versus special transitions and the reported breakdown of the quantum-classical mapping for θ1 constitute the main advance. The paper is credited for formulating the short-τ scaling ansatz and for performing the numerical test in a concrete lattice model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Scaling theory (abstract and § on scaling forms)] The scaling forms (Ms(τ) ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} and the definition of θ1) are obtained by direct substitution of static boundary exponents into the short-imaginary-time ansatz. This substitution presupposes that the chosen τ window is simultaneously short enough for the static boundary fixed point to dominate and long enough for universality to emerge, with higher-order irrelevant operators remaining negligible. No scaling dimensions of those operators are computed, rendering the assumption load-bearing for both the existence of θ1 and the claimed violation of the quantum-classical mapping.
  2. [Numerical results (§ on 2D Ising simulations)] The 2D quantum Ising numerics are taken as representative of the general d-dimensional quantum case, yet the manuscript does not report an explicit test that the fitted values of θ1 and θ1' remain stable when the τ-fitting window or the lattice regulator is varied. Without such a check the extracted power laws cannot be unambiguously attributed to the static boundary classes rather than to residual corrections or cutoff effects.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a subject-verb agreement error ('its intrinsic dynamical properties has been largely overlooked').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The scaling forms (Ms(τ) ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} and the definition of θ1) are obtained by direct substitution of static boundary exponents into the short-imaginary-time ansatz. This substitution presupposes that the chosen τ window is simultaneously short enough for the static boundary fixed point to dominate and long enough for universality to emerge, with higher-order irrelevant operators remaining negligible. No scaling dimensions of those operators are computed, rendering the assumption load-bearing for both the existence of θ1 and the claimed violation of the quantum-classical mapping.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The scaling forms follow from applying the short-imaginary-time ansatz to the known static boundary exponents, in direct analogy with established short-time dynamical scaling. The numerical data in the 2D quantum Ising model show clean power-law regimes consistent with these forms, supporting that the chosen τ window lies within the universal regime. While we have not performed an explicit renormalization-group calculation of the scaling dimensions of higher-order irrelevant operators at the boundary fixed points, such computations are outside the scope of the present work. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph discussing the assumptions underlying the ansatz, the expected irrelevance of subleading operators, and the empirical support provided by the observed scaling. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The 2D quantum Ising numerics are taken as representative of the general d-dimensional quantum case, yet the manuscript does not report an explicit test that the fitted values of θ1 and θ1' remain stable when the τ-fitting window or the lattice regulator is varied. Without such a check the extracted power laws cannot be unambiguously attributed to the static boundary classes rather than to residual corrections or cutoff effects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit stability tests would strengthen the numerical section. Although the original fits were performed over several overlapping τ intervals and multiple lattice sizes, with consistent exponent values obtained, we did not include a systematic scan of the fitting window or regulator. In the revised manuscript we will add supplementary analysis (including plots of fitted θ1 versus lower and upper τ cutoffs) demonstrating that the extracted exponents remain stable within the scaling regime and are insensitive to moderate changes in the lattice spacing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; scaling forms and new exponents are independent constructions

full rationale

The paper posits the short-imaginary-time scaling Ms(τ) ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} by direct use of known static boundary exponents and defines novel dynamical exponents θ1, θ1' from the initial-slip autocorrelation behavior. These relations do not reduce by construction to any fitted parameters or self-referential definitions inside the paper; the 2D Ising numerics serve as external verification rather than input. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are invoked to force the central claims. The assumption that the short-τ window is controlled by static boundary classes is a standard scaling hypothesis, not a circular reduction of the reported results to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The scaling theory rests on the domain assumption that static boundary universality classes fully determine the short-imaginary-time dynamic exponents; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Static boundary universality classes (ordinary and special transitions) dictate the short-imaginary-time dynamic scaling forms
    Invoked when writing Ms ∝ τ^{-β1/νz} and when defining the new exponent θ1.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5822 in / 1354 out tokens · 26436 ms · 2026-07-02T04:30:36.580761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In contrast to its positive bulk counterpart, the boundary initial-slip exponent 𝜃′ 1 is negative for the ordi- nary transition while remaining positive for the special transition. Although the static universality classes of 𝑑-dimensional quantum phase transitions generally coincide with those of (𝑑 + 1)-dimensional classical phase transitions, we show th...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Remarkably, 𝜃1 (𝜃′

    should be introduced to characterize the critical initial slip behaviors at the boundary. Remarkably, 𝜃1 (𝜃′

    work page

  3. [3]

    We further uncover the scaling relation between 𝜃1 (𝜃′

    is negative for the ordinary transition but positive for the special transition. We further uncover the scaling relation between 𝜃1 (𝜃′

    work page

  4. [4]

    and the bulk initial-slip exponent 𝜃. These results establish the framework of short-imaginary-time criti- cal dynamics near boundaries and reveal rich nonequilibrium scaling behavior associated with boundary universality classes, thereby bringing boundary criticality into the realm of short- imaginary-time dynamics. Scaling theory—In equilibrium, the bul...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Summary and discussion —In this work, we investigate short-imaginary-time quantum critical dynamics near bound- aries

    Furthermore, 𝜃′ 1 is even larger than its bulk counterpart, indicating that boundary criticality further enhances domain growth. Summary and discussion —In this work, we investigate short-imaginary-time quantum critical dynamics near bound- aries. We establish a scaling theory for boundary short- imaginary-time dynamics and identify a boundary initial-sli...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Un- like the static boundary exponents, 𝜃1 and 𝜃′ 1 are dynamic ex- ponents and generally differ between quantum and classical systems

    For the special transition, enhanced boundary correlations reinforce domain formation near the boundary and drive 𝜃1 positive. Un- like the static boundary exponents, 𝜃1 and 𝜃′ 1 are dynamic ex- ponents and generally differ between quantum and classical systems. The present work establishes a general framework for boundary short-imaginary-time quantum cri...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Domb and J

    C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz, eds., Phase Transitions and Criti- cal Phenomena, Vol. 8 (Academic Press, 1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Domb and J

    C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz, eds., Phase Transitions and Criti- cal Phenomena, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, 1986)

    work page 1986

  9. [9]

    H. W. Diehl, International Journal of Modern Physics B 11, 3503 (1997)

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    Pleimling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, R79 (2004)

    M. Pleimling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37, R79 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Binder and P

    K. Binder and P . C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. B 6, 3461 (1972)

    work page 1972

  12. [12]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. P . Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 318 (1984)

    work page 1984

  13. [13]

    D. P . Landau and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 41, 4633 (1990)

    work page 1990

  14. [14]

    Ruge and F

    C. Ruge and F. Wagner, Phys. Rev. B 52, 4209 (1995)

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    Y . Deng, H. W. J. Blöte, and M. P . Nightingale,Phys. Rev. E 72, 016128 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Deng,Phys

    Y . Deng,Phys. Rev. E 73, 056116 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Ritschel and P

    U. Ritschel and P . Czerner,Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3882 (1995)

    work page 1995

  18. [18]

    Pleimling and F

    M. Pleimling and F. Iglói, Phys. Rev. B 71, 094424 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Pleimling and F

    M. Pleimling and F. Iglói, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 145701 (2004)

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    S. Z. Lin and B. Zheng, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011127 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    M. A. Metlitski, SciPost Phys. 12, 131 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Parisen Toldin, Phys

    F. Parisen Toldin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 135701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    M. Hu, Y . Deng, and J.-P . Lv, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Parisen Toldin and M

    F. Parisen Toldin and M. A. Metlitski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 215701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Padayasi, A

    J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M. A. Metlitski, I. A. Gruzberg, and M. Meineri, SciPost Phys. 12, 190 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Y . Sun, J. Lyu, and J.-P . Lv,Phys. Rev. B 106, 174516 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Zhang, C

    L.-R. Zhang, C. Ding, Y . Deng, and L. Zhang,Phys. Rev. B105, 224415 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Sun and J.-P

    Y . Sun and J.-P . Lv,Phys. Rev. B 106, 224502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Sun and S.-K

    X. Sun and S.-K. Jian, SciPost Phys. 18, 210 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Hu and W

    R. Hu and W. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 221601 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Zhang and F

    L. Zhang and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 087201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Y . Zhu, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, Y .-C. Wang, and Z. Y an, arXiv:2508.07277 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Wang, S.-Q

    Z. Wang, S.-Q. Ning, Z. Liu, J. Rong, Y .-C. Wang, Z. Y an, and W. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Liu, R.-Z

    Z. Liu, R.-Z. Huang, Y .-C. Wang, Z. Y an, and D.-X. Y ao,Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 206502 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Y . Liu, T. Sato, D. Hou, Z. Wang, W. Guo, and F. F. Assaad, arXiv:2508.04455 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    F. P . Toldin, F. F. Assaad, and M. A. Metlitski, arXiv:2508.00999 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    X.-C. Wu, Y . Xu, H. Geng, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174406 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Scaffidi, D

    T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur,Phys. Rev. X7, 041048 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    C. Ding, L. Zhang, and W. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 235701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Weber, F

    L. Weber, F. Parisen Toldin, and S. Wessel, Phys. Rev. B 98, 140403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041059 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    W. Zhu, C. Ding, L. Zhang, and W. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024412 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Yu, R.-Z

    X.-J. Yu, R.-Z. Huang, H.-H. Song, L. Xu, C. Ding, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 210601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    H. K. Janssen, B. Schaub, and B. Schmittmann, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 73, 539 (1989)

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Z. B. Li, L. Schülke, and B. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3396 (1995)

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    Zheng, Phys

    B. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 679 (1996)

    work page 1996

  47. [47]

    E. V . Albano, M. A. Bab, G. Baglietto, R. A. Borzi, T. S. Grigera, E. S. Loscar, D. E. Rodriguez, M. L. R. Puzzo, and G. P . Saracco, Reports on Progress in Physics 74, 026501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Chiocchetta, M

    A. Chiocchetta, M. Tavora, A. Gambassi, and A. Mitra, Phys. Rev. B 91, 220302(R) (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Chiocchetta, M

    A. Chiocchetta, M. Tavora, A. Gambassi, and A. Mitra, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134311 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Chiocchetta, A

    A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, S. Diehl, and J. Marino,Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    S.-K. Jian, S. Yin, and B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Yin and S.-K

    S. Yin and S.-K. Jian, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    S. Yin, P . Mai, and F. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 89, 094108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Zhang, S

    S. Zhang, S. Yin, and F. Zhong, Phys. Rev. E90, 042104 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    A. W. Sandvik, AIP Conference Proceedings 1297, 135 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Vidal, Phys

    G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Vidal, Phys

    G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    Jordan, R

    J. Jordan, R. Orús, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    H. C. Jiang, Z. Y . Weng, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Assaad and H

    F. Assaad and H. Evertz, World-line and determinantal quan- tum monte carlo methods for spins, phonons and electrons, in Computational Many-Particle Physics , edited by H. Fehske, R. Schneider, and A. Weiße (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 277–356

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    Li and H

    Z.-X. Li and H. Y ao, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 337 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Motta, C

    M. Motta, C. Sun, A. T. K. Tan, M. J. O’Rourke, E. Y e, A. J. Minnich, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and G. K.-L. Chan,Nature Physics 16, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Nishi, T

    H. Nishi, T. Kosugi, and Y .-i. Matsushita, npj Quantum Infor- mation 7, 85 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Huo and Y

    M. Huo and Y . Li, Quantum 7, 916 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Y .-R. Shu, S. Yin, and D.-X. Y ao, Phys. Rev. B 96, 094304 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Shu, S.-K

    Y .-R. Shu, S.-K. Jian, and S. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 020601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Shu and S

    Y .-R. Shu and S. Yin, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104420 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Y .-K. Yu, Z. Zeng, Y .-R. Shu, Z.-X. Li, and S. Yin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 086502 (2026)

    work page 2026

  69. [69]

    Zhang and S

    S.-X. Zhang and S. Yin, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134309 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    H.- Y . Lin, S. Yin, Z. Y . Xie, and Z.- Y . Lu, Phys. Rev. B 113, 245108 (2026)

    work page 2026

  71. [71]

    Yu, Z.-X

    Y .-K. Yu, Z.-X. Li, S. Yin, and Z.-X. Li, Science Advances 12, eadz4856 (2026)

    work page 2026

  72. [72]

    C.- Y . Shen, S. Yin, and Z.-X. Li,arXiv:2512.23361 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Dietrich and H

    S. Dietrich and H. W. Diehl, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 51, 343 (1983)

    work page 1983

  74. [74]

    Kikuchi and Y

    M. Kikuchi and Y . Okabe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1220 (1985)

    work page 1985

  75. [75]

    H. W. Diehl, Phys. Rev. B 49, 2846 (1994)

    work page 1994

  76. [76]

    Symanzik, Nuclear Physics B 190, 1 (1981)

    K. Symanzik, Nuclear Physics B 190, 1 (1981)

    work page 1981

  77. [77]

    Campostrini, A

    M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P . Rossi, and E. Vicari,Phys. Rev. E 65, 066127 (2002)

    work page 2002

  78. [78]

    Simmons-Duffin, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 86 (2017)

    D. Simmons-Duffin, Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 86 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    work page 1999

  80. [80]

    Hasenbusch, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. B 83, 134425 (2011)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.