pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02017 · v1 · pith:4PYLG6WRnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Boson Stars in Teleparallel Gravity with a Nonminimally Coupled Field: The Violation of Energy Conditions and Gravitational Waveforms from EMRIs

Long-Xing Huang , Ke Yang , Yong-Qiang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 08:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th
keywords boson starsteleparallel gravityenergy conditionsextreme mass ratio inspiralsgravitational wavesLISAnon-minimal couplingscalar field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Excited-state boson stars in teleparallel gravity with non-minimal coupling exhibit negative energy density that violates all standard energy conditions, while ground states satisfy them and their EMRIs produce LISA-detectable waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper solves the field equations for static spherically symmetric boson stars in teleparallel gravity where a scalar field couples non-minimally to the torsion scalar. Numerical solutions show that excited states develop regions of negative energy density, so that the null, weak, strong and dominant energy conditions all fail. Ground-state solutions keep positive energy density everywhere and obey all four conditions. The authors then compute the frequency-domain characteristic strain for gravitational waves emitted by extreme-mass-ratio inspirals containing these boson stars and find the signals lie inside the LISA sensitivity window. A reader would care because the work supplies an explicit example of compact objects in modified gravity that break classical energy conditions yet remain potentially observable.

Core claim

The paper obtains both ground-state and excited-state boson star solutions in teleparallel gravity with non-minimal coupling. The excited-state solutions exhibit regions of negative energy density that violate the null, weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions, whereas the ground-state solutions maintain positive energy density and satisfy all four conditions. Additionally, the frequency-domain characteristic strain of gravitational waveforms from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals with these boson stars falls within the LISA detection range.

What carries the argument

Static spherically symmetric metric ansatz together with the teleparallel field equations that include non-minimal scalar-torsion coupling, which permit numerical construction of excited-state configurations possessing negative energy density.

If this is right

  • Ground-state solutions always keep positive energy density and satisfy the four energy conditions.
  • Excited-state solutions violate every one of the four standard energy conditions because of negative energy density.
  • The characteristic strain of EMRI waveforms sourced by these boson stars lies inside the LISA detection band.
  • These solutions supply concrete gravitational-wave signatures that could distinguish the objects from black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the excited states are stable, they could serve as observable alternatives to black holes in teleparallel gravity.
  • LISA data could place bounds on the non-minimal coupling strength by searching for the reported waveform features.
  • The contrast between ground and excited states suggests that energy-condition violation may be tied to the radial excitation level of the scalar field.

Load-bearing premise

The numerically obtained excited-state solutions are free of instabilities or coordinate artifacts that would remove the reported negative energy-density regions.

What would settle it

An independent numerical integration or analytic check that eliminates the negative energy-density regions in the excited states under a change of coordinates or a different regularization scheme.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02017 by Ke Yang, Long-Xing Huang, Yong-Qiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Compactness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Left panel: the profile of energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The profile of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Orbits for the ground-state boson stars with different values of the coupling parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The orbit for the first excited state boson stars with different values of the coupling parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: GW polarizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: GW polarizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: GW polarizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: GW polarizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The characteristic strain curve for different values of the parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Left: Convergence test for the scalar function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate boson star models within the framework of teleparallel gravity with non-minimal coupling, and obtain static, spherically symmetric solutions for both the ground state and excited states. The results indicate that the energy density of the excited-state solutions can become negative. For these solutions, the four commonly used energy conditions are no longer satisfied. In contrast, for all the ground-state solutions we have studied, the energy density remains positive and all four energy conditions are consistently satisfied. Moreover, considering the importance of astrophysical observations, the gravitational-wave signals from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals (EMRIs) composed of these boson stars are investigated. Our results reveal that the frequency-domain characteristic strain of these waveforms falls within the detectability range of LISA, which can provide potential evidence for distinguishing compact astrophysical objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs static spherically symmetric boson-star solutions in teleparallel gravity with non-minimal scalar-field coupling. It reports that excited-state solutions develop regions of negative energy density, violating the null, weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions, while all examined ground-state solutions maintain positive energy density and satisfy the four conditions. The work further computes frequency-domain characteristic strains for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) containing these objects and concludes that the signals lie within the LISA sensitivity band.

Significance. If the numerical solutions are shown to be reliable, the result would establish a concrete example in which teleparallel gravity plus non-minimal coupling produces energy-condition violation in compact objects while still yielding LISA-accessible waveforms. This would supply a falsifiable signature that could be used to distinguish such objects from standard neutron stars or black holes and would add to the catalog of modified-gravity effects on boson-star phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (excited-state solutions)] The abstract and results section state that excited-state solutions were obtained and energy conditions checked, yet no ODE system, boundary conditions, shooting parameters, residual norms, or convergence tests are supplied. Without these diagnostics the reported negative energy-density regions remain unverifiable and constitute the load-bearing claim of the paper.
  2. [Energy-conditions subsection] The claim that all four energy conditions are violated for excited states rests on the sign of the energy density ho; the manuscript must demonstrate that the numerical integration preserves the correct sign of ho to within a stated tolerance across the radial domain, especially near nodes where excited states are most sensitive to truncation error.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Parameter space] The range of the non-minimal coupling strength and scalar mass parameter explored should be stated explicitly, together with the number of nodes retained for the excited states.
  2. [EMRI waveforms] Figure captions for the waveform plots should include the specific boson-star parameters (mass, coupling, node number) used to generate each curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We agree that the numerical methodology requires explicit documentation to support the central claims regarding excited-state solutions. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section (excited-state solutions)] The abstract and results section state that excited-state solutions were obtained and energy conditions checked, yet no ODE system, boundary conditions, shooting parameters, residual norms, or convergence tests are supplied. Without these diagnostics the reported negative energy-density regions remain unverifiable and constitute the load-bearing claim of the paper.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript omits the explicit numerical implementation details. The system of ODEs is obtained by substituting the static spherically symmetric ansatz into the teleparallel field equations with non-minimal coupling, but these equations, the central regularity conditions, the asymptotic decay requirements, the shooting parameters, and the convergence diagnostics were not reported. In the revised version we will add a dedicated numerical-methods subsection that presents the full first-order ODE system, the boundary conditions, the shooting procedure, the integrator tolerances, and the achieved residual norms for both ground and excited states. This addition will make the negative-energy-density regions reproducible. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Energy-conditions subsection] The claim that all four energy conditions are violated for excited states rests on the sign of the energy density ρ; the manuscript must demonstrate that the numerical integration preserves the correct sign of ρ to within a stated tolerance across the radial domain, especially near nodes where excited states are most sensitive to truncation error.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the sign of ρ, together with an error estimate, is required. The revised manuscript will include a short convergence study (varying step size and integrator tolerance) focused on the radial intervals containing nodes, together with a table or figure reporting the minimum value of ρ and the maximum relative truncation error in those regions. We will state the tolerance within which the sign of ρ is preserved and confirm that the reported violations remain stable under refinement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper constructs static spherically symmetric boson-star solutions by numerically integrating the field equations derived from the teleparallel action with non-minimal coupling, then directly evaluates the energy density and energy conditions from the resulting stress-energy tensor. The reported negative energy density for excited states and the LISA-range EMRI waveforms are outputs of this integration process rather than quantities defined in terms of fitted parameters or self-referential inputs. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming of a known result; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on the standard field equations of teleparallel gravity with a chosen non-minimal coupling term, plus the assumption that static spherically symmetric ansätze admit numerical solutions; no new entities are postulated and the coupling strength and scalar mass appear as free parameters typical of the model class.

free parameters (2)
  • non-minimal coupling strength
    The strength of the non-minimal coupling between the scalar field and the torsion scalar is a model parameter that must be chosen to obtain the reported solutions.
  • scalar field mass parameter
    The mass of the complex scalar field is a free parameter that sets the scale of the boson-star solutions.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity plus the chosen non-minimal coupling term yields a well-posed system of differential equations for static spherical symmetry.
    Invoked when the authors state that static spherically symmetric solutions were obtained.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5691 in / 1461 out tokens · 22022 ms · 2026-07-03T08:28:11.733722+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The boundary conditions and numerical method In order to solve the system of ODEs (15) - (18), appropriate boundary conditions should be provided

    +r 2F ′′ 0 r2 −κp ⊥ = 0,(17) ϕ′′ + 2 +F ′ 0 −F ′ 1 r ϕ′ + h4ξ(1 +e F1)F ′ 0 r + 2ξ(1−2e F1 +e 2F1) r2 + (ω2e−2F0 −µ 2)e2F1 i ϕ= 0,(18) with the energy density ρ=−Θ tt = e−2F0ω2 +µ 2 ϕ2 + e−2F1ϕ′2 −8ξr −1e−2F1 eF1 −1 ϕϕ′ κ(1 + 2ξϕ2) ,(19) the radial pressure pr = Θrr = e−2F0ω2 −µ 2 ϕ2 + e−2F1ϕ′2 κ(1 + 2ξϕ2) (20) and the transverse pressure p⊥ = Θϑϑ = Θφφ =...

  2. [2]

    penetrating orbits

    In addition, due to spherical symmetry, for simplicity, we only consider the orbit lying on the equatorial plane (i.e.θ=π/2). In addition, static spherical symmetry means that the spacetime can possess a timelike Killing vector (∂ t)µ and a spacelike Killing vector (∂ φ)µ, which are associated with two motion constants, i.e., the specific energy E= ∂L ∂ ˙...

    2000

  3. [3]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.6, 061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019), L1 [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro- ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L2 [arXiv:1906.11239 [astro-ph.IM]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L3 [arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L4 [arXiv:1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L5 [arXiv:1906.11242 [astro- ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L6 [arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.14(1965), 57-59

    1965

  11. [11]

    The Occurrence of singularities in cosmology,

    S. Hawking, “The Occurrence of singularities in cosmology,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A294(1966), 511-521

    1966

  12. [12]

    Black holes in general relativity,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in general relativity,” Commun. Math. Phys.25(1972), 152-166

    1972

  13. [13]

    The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973), 161-170

    1973

  14. [14]

    Wald, Robert M. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermody- 29 namics,

    R. M. Wald, “Wald, Robert M. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermody- 29 namics,” University of Chicago press, 1994

    1994

  15. [15]

    Positivity of the Total Mass of a General Space-Time,

    R. Schoen and S. T. Yau, “Positivity of the Total Mass of a General Space-Time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979), 1457-1459

    1979

  16. [16]

    On the Proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity,

    R. Schon and S. T. Yau, “On the Proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity,” Commun. Math. Phys.65(1979), 45-76

    1979

  17. [17]

    PROOF THAT THE BONDI MASS IS POSITIVE,

    R. Schon and S. T. Yau, “PROOF THAT THE BONDI MASS IS POSITIVE,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982), 369-371

    1982

  18. [18]

    A Positive Mass Theorem Based on the Focusing and Retardation of Null Geodesics

    R. Penrose, R. D. Sorkin and E. Woolgar, “A Positive mass theorem based on the focusing and retar- dation of null geodesics,” [arXiv:gr-qc/9301015 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory,

    E. A. Kontou and K. Sanders, “Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory,” Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) no.19, 193001 [arXiv:2003.01815 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Time, closed timelike curves and causality,

    F. Lobo and P. Crawford, “Time, closed timelike curves and causality,” inThe Nature of Time: Ge- ometry, Physics and Perception, Springer Netherlands, pp. 289–296, 2003

    2003

  21. [21]

    Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, “Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,” Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988), 1446-1449

    1988

  22. [22]

    Twilight for the energy conditions?

    C. Barcelo and M. Visser, “Twilight for the energy conditions?,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11(2002), 1553-1560 doi:10.1142/S0218271802002888 [arXiv:gr-qc/0205066 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271802002888 2002

  23. [23]

    A Primer on Energy Conditions,

    E. Curiel, “A Primer on Energy Conditions,” Einstein Stud.13(2017), 43-104 [arXiv:1405.0403 [physics.hist-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    The large scale structure of space-time,

    S.W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis, “The large scale structure of space-time,” Cambridge University Press , 1973

    1973

  25. [25]

    General Relativity,

    R. M. Wald, “General Relativity,” The University of Chicago Press , 1984

    1984

  26. [26]

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

    A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerat- ing universe and a cosmological constant,” Astron. J.116(1998), 1009-1038 [arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae,” Astrophys. J.517(1999), 565-586 [arXiv:astro-ph/9812133 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  28. [28]

    Beyond $\Lambda$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead

    P. Bull, Y. Akrami, J. Adamek, T. Baker, E. Bellini, J. Beltran Jimenez, E. Bentivegna, S. Camera, S. Clesse and J. H. Davis,et al.“Beyond ΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead,” Phys. Dark Univ.12(2016), 56-99 [arXiv:1512.05356 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity

    K. Koyama, “Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity,” Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) no.4, 046902 [arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution,” Phys. Rept.692(2017), 1-104 [arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Modified Gravity and Cosmology. An Update by the CAN- TATA Network,

    E. N. Saridakiset al.[CANTATA], “Modified Gravity and Cosmology. An Update by the CAN- TATA Network,” Springer, 2021, ISBN 978-3-030-83714-3, 978-3-030-83717-4, 978-3-030-83715-0 [arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Introduction to Modified Gravity,

    A. Petrov, J. R. Nascimento and P. Porfirio, “Introduction to Modified Gravity,” Springer, 2020, ISBN 978-3-031-46633-5, 978-3-031-46634-2, 978-3-030-52861-4, 978-3-030-52862-1 [arXiv:2004.12758 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Spectrum of Primordial Gravitational Waves in Modified Gravities: A Short Overview,

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and R. Myrzakulov, “Spectrum of Primordial Gravitational Waves in Modified Gravities: A Short Overview,” Symmetry14(2022) no.4, 729 [arXiv:2204.00876 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?,

    S. Shankaranarayanan and J. P. Johnson, “Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?,” Gen. Rel. Grav.54(2022) no.5, 44 [arXiv:2204.06533 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    GW Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar-Timing Arrays,

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens and K. Yagi, “GW Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar-Timing Arrays,” [arXiv:2408.05240 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    R + R**2 gravity as R + back reaction,

    J. H. Kung, “R + R**2 gravity as R + back reaction,” Phys. Rev. D52(1995), 6922-6928 [arXiv:gr- qc/9509058 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 1995

  37. [37]

    Strong Energy Condition in $R + R^2$ Gravity

    J. H. Kung, “Strong energy condition in R + R**2 gravity,” Phys. Rev. D53(1996), 3017-3021 30 [arXiv:gr-qc/9510008 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    Energy conditions in f(R)-gravity

    J. Santos, J. S. Alcaniz, M. J. Reboucas and F. C. Carvalho, “Energy conditions in f(R)-gravity,” Phys. Rev. D76(2007), 083513 [arXiv:0708.0411 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Energy Conditions and Stability in $f(R)$ theories of gravity with non-minimal coupling to matter

    O. Bertolami and M. C. Sequeira, “Energy Conditions and Stability in f(R) theories of gravity with non-minimal coupling to matter,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009), 104010 [arXiv:0903.4540 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  40. [40]

    Constraining f(R) theories with the energy conditions

    S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, “Constraining f(R) theories with the energy conditions,” Phys. Lett. B642 (2006), 311-314 [arXiv:gr-qc/0608072 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    Energy conditions in f(R) gravity and Brans-Dicke theories

    K. Atazadeh, A. Khaleghi, H. R. Sepangi and Y. Tavakoli, “Energy conditions in f(R) gravity and Brans-Dicke theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D18(2009), 1101-1111 [arXiv:0811.4269 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    Energy conditions bounds on f(T) gravity

    D. Liu and M. J. Reboucas, “Energy conditions bounds on f(T) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 083515 [arXiv:1207.1503 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    Energy conditions in $f(T)$ gravity with non-minimal torsion-matter coupling

    M. Zubair and S. Waheed, “Energy conditions inf(T) gravity with non-minimal torsion-matter cou- pling,” Astrophys. Space Sci.355(2015), 361-369 [arXiv:1502.03002 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Energy conditions in f(T) gravity with higher-derivative torsion terms

    T. Azizi and M. Gorjizadeh, “Energy conditions in f(T) gravity with higher-derivative torsion terms,” EPL117(2017) no.6, 60003 [arXiv:1701.00796 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    f(R) Theories Of Gravity

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, “f(R) Theories Of Gravity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010), 451-497 [arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity

    J. W. Maluf, “The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,” Annalen Phys.525(2013), 339-357 [arXiv:1303.3897 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology

    Y. F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and E. N. Saridakis, “f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmol- ogy,” Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) no.10, 106901 [arXiv:1511.07586 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology,

    S. Bahamonde, K. F. Dialektopoulos, C. Escamilla-Rivera, G. Farrugia, V. Gakis, M. Hendry, M. Hohmann, J. Levi Said, J. Mifsud and E. Di Valentino, “Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology,” Rept. Prog. Phys.86(2023) no.2, 026901 [arXiv:2106.13793 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Modified teleparallel gravity: inflation without inflaton

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, “Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton,” Phys. Rev. D75 (2007), 084031 [arXiv:gr-qc/0610067 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Nonminimally coupled scalar field in teleparallel gravity: boson stars

    D. Horvat, S. Iliji´ c, A. Kirin and Z. Naranˇ ci´ c, “Nonminimally coupled scalar field in teleparallel gravity: boson stars,” Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) no.3, 035023 [arXiv:1407.2067 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Klein-Gordon Geon,

    D. J. Kaup, “Klein-Gordon Geon,” Phys. Rev.172(1968), 1331-1342

    1968

  52. [52]

    Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, “Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,” Phys. Rev.187(1969), 1767-1783

    1969

  53. [53]

    Spherical Boson Stars as Black Hole mimickers

    F. S. Guzman and J. M. Rueda-Becerril, “Spherical boson stars as black hole mimickers,” Phys. Rev. D80(2009), 084023 [arXiv:1009.1250 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,

    C. Bambi, R. Brustein, V. Cardoso, A. Chael, U. Danielsson, S. Giri, A. Gupta, P. Heidmann, L. Lehner and S. Liebling,et al.“Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation,” [arXiv:2505.09014 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    TOPICAL REVIEW: General relativistic boson stars

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, “General relativistic boson stars,” Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003), R301-R356 [arXiv:0801.0307 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    Dynamical Boson Stars

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, “Dynamical boson stars,” Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) no.1, 1 [arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Stars of Bosons with Nonminimal Energy Momentum Tensor,

    J. J. van der Bij and M. Gleiser, “Stars of Bosons with Nonminimal Energy Momentum Tensor,” Phys. Lett. B194(1987), 482-486

    1987

  58. [58]

    "Teleparallel" Dark Energy

    C. Q. Geng, C. C. Lee, E. N. Saridakis and Y. P. Wu, ““Teleparallel” dark energy,” Phys. Lett. B704 (2011), 384-387 [arXiv:1109.1092 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Dynamics of Teleparallel Dark Energy

    H. Wei, “Dynamics of Teleparallel Dark Energy,” Phys. Lett. B712(2012), 430-436 [arXiv:1109.6107 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  60. [60]

    Scaling attractors in interacting teleparallel dark energy

    G. Otalora, “Scaling attractors in interacting teleparallel dark energy,” JCAP07(2013), 044 [arXiv:1305.0474 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Neutron stars in scalar torsion theories with non minimal 31 coupling,

    Y. Kehal, K. Nouicer and H. Boumaza, “Neutron stars in scalar torsion theories with non minimal 31 coupling,” JCAP05(2024), 057 [arXiv:2305.12155 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    The covariant formulation of f(T) gravity

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak and E. N. Saridakis, “The covariant formulation of f(T) gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) no.11, 115009 [arXiv:1510.08432 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Spin Connection and Renormalization of Teleparallel Action

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak and J. G. Pereira, “Spin Connection and Renormalization of Teleparallel Action,” Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) no.11, 519 [arXiv:1504.07683 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Teleparallel theories of gravity: illuminating a fully invariant approach,

    M. Krssak, R. J. van den Hoogen, J. G. Pereira, C. G. B¨ ohmer and A. A. Coley, “Teleparallel theories of gravity: illuminating a fully invariant approach,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) no.18, 183001 [arXiv:1810.12932 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Non trivial frames for f(T) theories of gravity and beyond

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, “Non trivial frames for f(T) theories of gravity and beyond,” Phys. Lett. B 702(2011), 75-80 [arXiv:1103.0824 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [66]

    Birkhoff's theorem in the f(T) gravity

    X. H. Meng and Y. B. Wang, “Birkhoff’s theorem in the f(T) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011), 1755 [arXiv:1107.0629 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Existence of relativistic stars in f(T) gravity

    C. G. Boehmer, A. Mussa and N. Tamanini, “Existence of relativistic stars in f(T) gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011), 245020 [arXiv:1107.4455 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Spherically symmetric static spacetimes in vacuum f(T) gravity

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, “Spherically symmetric static spacetimes in vacuum f(T) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D84(2011), 083518 [arXiv:1109.4209 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    Good and bad tetrads in f(T) gravity

    N. Tamanini and C. G. Boehmer, “Good and bad tetrads in f(T) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 044009 [arXiv:1204.4593 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  70. [70]

    Gravitational Stability of Scalar Matter,

    M. Gleiser and R. Watkins, “Gravitational Stability of Scalar Matter,” Nucl. Phys. B319(1989), 733-746

    1989

  71. [71]

    Dynamical Evolution of Boson Stars. 1. Perturbing the Ground State,

    E. Seidel and W. M. Suen, “Dynamical Evolution of Boson Stars. 1. Perturbing the Ground State,” Phys. Rev. D42(1990), 384-403

    1990

  72. [72]

    Dynamical Evolution of Boson Stars II: Excited States and Self-Interacting Fields

    J. Balakrishna, E. Seidel and W. M. Suen, “Dynamical evolution of boson stars. 2. Excited states and selfinteracting fields,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998), 104004 [arXiv:gr-qc/9712064 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  73. [73]

    Scalar Soliton Stars and Black Holes,

    R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, “Scalar Soliton Stars and Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D35(1987), 3658

    1987

  74. [74]

    ECO-spotting: looking for extremely compact objects with bosonic fields,

    V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo, K. i. Maeda and H. Okawa, “ECO-spotting: looking for extremely compact objects with bosonic fields,” Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) no.3, 034001 [arXiv:2112.05750 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Soliton boson stars, Q-balls and the causal Buchdahl bound,

    M. Boˇ skovi´ c and E. Barausse, “Soliton boson stars, Q-balls and the causal Buchdahl bound,” JCAP 02(2022) no.02, 032 [arXiv:2111.03870 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Solitonic boson stars: Numerical solutions beyond the thin-wall approximation,

    L. G. Collodel and D. D. Doneva, “Solitonic boson stars: Numerical solutions beyond the thin-wall approximation,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.8, 084057 [arXiv:2203.08203 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    General Relativistic Fluid Spheres,

    H. A. Buchdahl, “General Relativistic Fluid Spheres,” Phys. Rev.116(1959), 1027

    1959

  78. [78]

    "Kludge" gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole

    S. Babak, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, K. Glampedakis and S. A. Hughes, “’Kludge’ gravitational waveforms for a test-body orbiting a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D75(2007), 024005 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 77(2008), 04990] [arXiv:gr-qc/0607007 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  79. [79]

    Boson Stars in Bumblebee Gravity and Their Gravitational Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    M. J. Liu, L. X. Huang, Y. Q. Wang and K. Yang, “Boson Stars in Bumblebee Gravity and Their Gravitational Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals,” Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026), 651 [arXiv:2512.19581 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,

    K. S. Thorne, “Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980), 299-339

    1980

Showing first 80 references.