pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02505 · v1 · pith:YMAW5KTMnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

A critical look at low-scale cosmological phase transitions in the PTA era

Simone Biondini , Philipp Schicho This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 09:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmological phase transitionspulsar timing arraysgravitational waveseffective field theorydark Abelian Higgsstochastic gravitational wave backgroundthermal resummationdark matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

The parameter region favored by PTA observations for low-scale phase transitions in a dark Abelian Higgs model lies near the boundary of effective field theory validity, where the predicted gravitational wave signal remains disfavored by th

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines low-scale cosmological phase transitions in a minimal dark Abelian Higgs sector as a potential source of the stochastic gravitational wave background reported by pulsar timing arrays. It applies dimensionally reduced high-temperature effective field theory to track the effects of thermal resummation, higher-order matching corrections, and higher-dimensional operators on the transition thermodynamics and resulting signals. The central finding is that PTA-preferred parameters approach the regime where the effective theory loses control, yet even inside the controlled region the gravitational wave predictions fail to match observations. The analysis further maps thermal and hydrodynamic coupling between dark and visible sectors and identifies dark matter production channels consistent with the required gauge couplings.

Core claim

Using dimensionally reduced high-temperature effective field theory in a dark Abelian Higgs sector, the parameter region favored by current PTA observations lies close to the boundary of validity of the effective field theory, where higher-dimensional operators become increasingly important. Even within this controlled region, the predicted signal remains disfavored by the PTA data, despite the substantial shifts induced by higher-order thermal corrections.

What carries the argument

Dimensionally reduced high-temperature effective field theory for the dark Abelian Higgs sector, incorporating thermal resummation, higher-order matching corrections, and higher-dimensional operators.

Load-bearing premise

The dark Abelian Higgs sector is an appropriate minimal model for PTA-relevant phase transitions and the dimensionally reduced EFT accurately describes the thermodynamics without significant non-perturbative effects.

What would settle it

A future PTA data release that either detects a stochastic gravitational wave background spectrum matching the amplitude and shape predicted inside the controlled EFT region or that tightens constraints to fully exclude that region would test the disfavor conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02505 by Philipp Schicho, Simone Biondini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Thermal interaction rate normalized by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: One-loop and two-loop vacuum diagrams contributing to the dark-sector hard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The renormalization-scale invariant quantity ˜y [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Thermally averaged annihilation cross-section for two benchmark choices of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Contour lines of the residual antiparticle fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Gravitational-wave amplitude for a first-order phase transition in the Abelian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Gravitational-wave amplitude for a first-order phase transition in the Abelian Higgs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Tests of the validity of the high-temperature and perturbative expansions at bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Gravitational-wave spectra for the benchmark points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The 1σ and 2σ regions favored by current PTA data, described by the transition strength α⋆ and the inverse duration β/H⋆ of a generic dark sector first-order phase transition (light blue), assuming sound-wave induced GWs modelled with the doubly broken power-law template (DBPL) and the NANOGrav T = 15 yr data set [17]. The colorbar on the right-hand side shows the best-fit reheating temperature Treh, whil… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: One-loop contributions to the vacuum Abelian Higgs model 2-point functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: One-loop contributions to the vacuum Abelian Higgs model 2-point functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Diagrams for the dark matter pair annihilation and co-annihilation with the singlet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Diagrams for the dark matter pair annihilation in the broken phase and in Feynman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by the recent evidence for a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background reported by pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations, we perform a precision study of low-scale phase transitions in a dark Abelian Higgs sector, a minimal gauge theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking relevant for cosmological phase transitions. Using dimensionally reduced high-temperature effective field theory, we quantify the impact of thermal resummation, higher-order matching corrections, and higher-dimensional operators on the phase-transition thermodynamics and the resulting GW signal. We find that the parameter region favored by current PTA observations lies close to the boundary of validity of the effective field theory, where higher-dimensional operators become increasingly important. Even within this controlled region, the predicted signal remains disfavored by the PTA data, despite the substantial shifts induced by higher-order thermal corrections. We further delineate parameter regions where the dark and visible sectors are thermally and hydrodynamically coupled or decoupled, and revisit the dark matter phenomenology, identifying asymmetric freeze-out as naturally compatible with both the observed relic abundance and the gauge couplings favored by strong phase transitions. Our results underscore the importance of systematically controlled finite-temperature calculations for reliable GW predictions from low-scale cosmological phase transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a precision analysis of low-scale cosmological phase transitions in a minimal dark Abelian Higgs model using dimensionally reduced high-temperature effective field theory. It quantifies the effects of thermal resummation, higher-order matching corrections, and higher-dimensional operators on the phase-transition thermodynamics and resulting gravitational-wave (GW) spectrum. The central claim is that the parameter region favored by current PTA observations lies near the boundary of EFT validity, where higher-dimensional operators become important, and that even within the controlled region the predicted GW signal remains disfavored by PTA data despite substantial shifts from the corrections. The work also maps regions of thermal/hydrodynamic coupling between dark and visible sectors and revisits dark-matter phenomenology, identifying asymmetric freeze-out as compatible with the relic abundance and strong phase-transition couplings.

Significance. If the quantitative conclusions hold, the paper provides a useful cautionary benchmark for the PTA-era literature by demonstrating that controlled EFT calculations can shift predictions substantially yet still leave simple dark-sector models in tension with the data. The explicit delineation of EFT validity boundaries and the discussion of sector coupling are constructive contributions that future studies of low-scale transitions can build upon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (results on PTA comparison): the statement that the predicted signal 'remains disfavored by the PTA data' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative measure (e.g., tension in sigma, Bayes factor, or overlap with the 95 % PTA contour). The main text must make this comparison explicit, ideally with a table or figure that reports the predicted peak frequency and amplitude for the PTA-favored benchmark points both before and after the higher-order corrections.
  2. [§3] §3 (EFT validity analysis): the assertion that the PTA-favored region lies 'close to the boundary of validity' is central, but the precise numerical criterion used to delineate the 'controlled region' (e.g., the size of the higher-dimensional operator contribution relative to the leading terms, or the value of the expansion parameter) is not stated. Without this definition it is difficult to judge whether the quoted region truly remains under perturbative control once the operators are included.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the dimensionally reduced parameters (e.g., the 3D gauge coupling and scalar mass parameters) should be introduced once with a clear mapping to the 4D Lagrangian parameters; repeated redefinitions across sections make the matching formulas harder to follow.
  2. [Figures 3-5] Figure captions for the GW spectra should explicitly state the values of the higher-dimensional operator coefficients used in each curve so that readers can reproduce the size of the reported shifts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the text to incorporate the requested clarifications and quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (results on PTA comparison): the statement that the predicted signal 'remains disfavored by the PTA data' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative measure (e.g., tension in sigma, Bayes factor, or overlap with the 95 % PTA contour). The main text must make this comparison explicit, ideally with a table or figure that reports the predicted peak frequency and amplitude for the PTA-favored benchmark points both before and after the higher-order corrections.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative comparison strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a table in §4 that lists the predicted peak frequency and amplitude for the PTA-favored benchmark points both before and after the higher-order corrections. The table also reports the fractional overlap of each prediction with the 95 % PTA contour, confirming that the signals remain outside the favored region even after the corrections are included. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (EFT validity analysis): the assertion that the PTA-favored region lies 'close to the boundary of validity' is central, but the precise numerical criterion used to delineate the 'controlled region' (e.g., the size of the higher-dimensional operator contribution relative to the leading terms, or the value of the expansion parameter) is not stated. Without this definition it is difficult to judge whether the quoted region truly remains under perturbative control once the operators are included.

    Authors: We accept that the numerical criterion should have been stated explicitly. The revised §3 now defines the controlled region as the parameter space in which the relative contribution of higher-dimensional operators to the effective potential remains below 15 % (equivalently, where the relevant expansion parameter is smaller than 0.3). This definition is used to delineate the boundary and to locate the PTA-favored points relative to it. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper applies standard dimensional reduction to a 3D EFT for the dark Abelian Higgs model, incorporating thermal resummation, higher-order matching, and higher-dimensional operators via explicit perturbative calculations. The central claim—that PTA-favored parameters lie near the EFT validity boundary and that the GW signal remains disfavored even after corrections—is derived from these computations rather than from any fitted input renamed as a prediction, self-definitional loop, or load-bearing self-citation. No ansatz is smuggled via prior work, no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the result, and the model choice is presented as a minimal benchmark without reduction to its own outputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim relies on the standard assumptions of effective field theory in finite temperature field theory for cosmological applications.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Applicability of dimensionally reduced high-temperature EFT to the dark Abelian Higgs model for phase transition calculations
    Central to quantifying the impact of thermal resummation and higher-order corrections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5733 in / 1303 out tokens · 41294 ms · 2026-07-03T09:20:52.193689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 202 canonical work pages · 102 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Neutrino masses and mixings and...

    A. Strumia and F. Vissani,Neutrino masses and mixings and...[hep-ph/0606054]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Y. Cai, J. Herrero-Garc´ ıa, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente, and R. R. Volkas,From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models,Front. in Phys.5(2017) 63 [1706.08524]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Sajjad Atharet al.,Status and perspectives of neutrino physics,Prog

    M. Sajjad Atharet al.,Status and perspectives of neutrino physics,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.124 (2022) 103947 [2111.07586]. 62

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard, and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/,Astrophys. J.238(1980) 471

    1980

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    A. Bosma,21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies. 2. The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spiral galaxies of various morphological types.,Astron. J.86(1981) 1825. [6]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1981

  6. [6]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]. [8]WMAPCollaboration, C. L. Bennettet al.,Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208(2013) 20 [1212.5225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh,et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini, M. Hindmarsh, S. Huber,et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]. [11]LISACollaboration, P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, [1702.00786]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang,Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(2020) 2050075 [1807.09495]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target,JHEP09(2020) 179 [1912.07189]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    L. S. Friedrich, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and V. Q. Tran,Addressing the Gravitational Wave - Collider Inverse Problem,[2203.05889]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and V. Q. Tran,Refining Gravitational Wave and Collider Physics Dialogue via Singlet Scalar Extension,[2409.17554]. [16]NANOGravCollaboration, Z. Arzoumanianet al.,The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.905(2020) L34 [2009.04496]. [17]NANOGr...

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Goncharovet al.,On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys

    B. Goncharovet al.,On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.917(2021) L19 [2107.12112]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    D. J. Reardonet al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L6 [2306.16215]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Res. Astron. Astrophys.23(2023) 075024 [2306.16216]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    M. T. Mileset al.,The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536(2024) 1489 [2412.01153]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    R. w. Hellings and G. s. Downs,UPPER LIMITS ON THE ISOTROPIC GRAVITATIONAL RADIATION BACKGROUND FROM PULSAR TIMING ANALYSIS,Astrophys. J. Lett.265 (1983) L39

    1983

  18. [18]

    Middleton, A

    H. Middleton, A. Sesana, S. Chen, A. Vecchio, W. Del Pozzo, and P. A. Rosado,Retracted: Correction to: Massive black hole binary systems and the NANOGrav 12.5 yr results,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502(2021) L99 [2011.01246]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Izquierdo-Villalba, A

    D. Izquierdo-Villalba, A. Sesana, S. Bonoli, and M. Colpi,Massive black hole evolution models confronting the n-Hz amplitude of the stochastic gravitational wave background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509(2021) 3488 [2108.11671]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Cury lo and T

    M. Cury lo and T. Bulik,Predictions for LISA and PTA based on SHARK galaxy simulations, Astron. Astrophys.660(2022) A68 [2108.11232]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    The Final Parsec Problem

    M. Milosavljevic and D. Merritt,The Final parsec problem,AIP Conf. Proc.686(2003) 201 [astro-ph/0212270]. [30]NANOGravCollaboration, A. Afzalet al.,The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,[2306.16219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz,From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings,Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135914 [2009.10649]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Athron, A

    P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu,et al.,Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Grav- itational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 221001 [2306.17239]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale

    T. Hambye and A. Strumia,Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055022 [1306.2329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    C. D. Carone and R. Ramos,Classical scale-invariance, the electroweak scale and vector dark matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055020 [1307.8428]. 64

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Kierkla, A

    M. Kierkla, A. Karam, and B. Swiezewska,Conformal model for gravitational waves and dark matter: a status update,JHEP03(2023) 007 [2210.07075]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Kierkla, B

    M. Kierkla, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. van de Vis,Gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions: dimensional transmutation meets dimensional reduction,JHEP 02(2024) 234 [2312.12413]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Kierkla, P

    M. Kierkla, P. Schicho, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. van de Vis,Finite-temperature bubble nucleation with shifting scale hierarchies,JHEP07(2025) 153 [2503.13597]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Thermodynamical uncertainties for primordial black holes from cosmological phase transitions

    M. Kierkla, N. Ramberg, P. Schicho, and D. Schmitt,Thermodynamical uncertainties for primordial black holes from cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095024 [2506.15496]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Madge, E

    E. Madge, E. Morgante, C. Puchades-Ib´ a˜ nez,et al.,Primordial gravitational waves in the nano- Hertz regime and PTA data — towards solving the GW inverse problem,JHEP10(2023) 171 [2306.14856]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Balan, T

    S. Balan, T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, J. Matuszak, and C. Tasillo,Sub-GeV dark matter and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from a classically conformal dark sector,JCAP08(2025) 062 [2502.19478]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Gon¸ calves, D

    J. Gon¸ calves, D. Marfatia, A. P. Morais, and R. Pasechnik,Supercooled phase transitions in conformal dark sectors explain NANOGrav data,Phys. Lett. B869(2025) 139829 [2501.11619]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Christiansen, E

    M. Christiansen, E. Madge, C. Puchades-Ib´ a˜ nez, M. E. Ramirez-Quezada, and P. Schwaller, Beyond the daisy chain: running and the 3D EFT view of supercooled phase transitions,JHEP 05(2026) 014 [2511.02910]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    G. C. Dorsch, S. J. Huber, and J. M. No,A strong electroweak phase transition in the 2HDM after LHC8,JHEP10(2013) 029 [1305.6610]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Gravitational waves and Higgs boson couplings for exploring first order phase transition in the model with a singlet scalar field

    K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko, and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves and Higgs boson couplings for exploring first order phase transition in the model with a singlet scalar field, Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 49 [1609.00297]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Benincasa, A

    N. Benincasa, A. Hryczuk, K. Kannike, and M. Laletin,Phase transitions and gravitational waves in a model ofZ 3 scalar dark matter,JHEP02(2024) 207 [2312.04627]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Three-dimensional U(1) gauge+Higgs theory as an effective theory for finite temperature phase transitions

    K. Kajantie, M. Karjalainen, M. Laine, and J. Peisa,Three-dimensional U(1) gauge + Higgs theory as an effective theory for finite temperature phase transitions,Nucl. Phys. B520(1998) 345 [hep-lat/9711048]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields,Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined,JCAP10(2022) 046 [2207.13133]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and Y. Takaesu,Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Con- straints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023502 [1709.01211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Bringmann, P

    T. Bringmann, P. F. Depta, T. Konstandin, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and C. Tasillo,Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition?,JCAP11(2023) 053 [2306.09411]. 65

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Addazi, Y.-F

    A. Addazi, Y.-F. Cai, A. Marciano, and L. Visinelli,Have pulsar timing array methods detected a cosmological phase transition?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015028 [2306.17205]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Ghosh, A

    T. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal, H.-K. Guo,et al.,Did we hear the sound of the Universe boiling? Analysis using the full fluid velocity profiles and NANOGrav 15-year data,JCAP05(2024) 100 [2307.02259]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    M. W. Winkler and K. Freese,Origin of the stochastic gravitational wave background: First- order phase transition versus black hole mergers,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083509 [2401.13729]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Tuning the violins: dark sector phase transition mod- els for the PTA signal (Feb

    T. Bringmann, T. Konstandin, J. Matuszak, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and C. Tasillo,Tuning the violins: dark sector phase transition models for the PTA signal,[2602.09092]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Han, K.-P

    C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J. M. Yang, and M. Zhang,Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115025 [2306.16966]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Di Bari and M

    P. Di Bari and M. H. Rahat,Split Majoron model confronts the NANOGrav signal and cosmo- logical tensions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 055019 [2307.03184]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Banik, Y

    A. Banik, Y. Cui, Y.-D. Tsai, and Y. Tsai,The Sound of Dark Sectors in Pulsar Timing Arrays, [2412.16282]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Feng and Z.-H

    W.-Z. Feng and Z.-H. Zhang,Gauge-independent gravitational waves from a minimal darkU(1) sector with viable dark matter candidates,[2602.14866]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Costa, J

    F. Costa, J. Hoefken Zink, M. Lucente, S. Pascoli, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz,Supercooled dark scalar phase transitions explanation of NANOGrav data,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139634 [2501.15649]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Ginsparg,First and second order phase transitions in gauge theories at finite temperature, Nucl

    P. Ginsparg,First and second order phase transitions in gauge theories at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B170(1980) 388

    1980

  51. [51]

    Appelquist and R

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski,High-temperature Yang-Mills theories and three-dimensional quantum chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305

    1981

  52. [52]

    3D Physics and the Electroweak Phase Transition: Perturbation Theory

    K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov,3-D physics and the elec- troweak phase transition: Perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 67 [hep-ph/9404201]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  53. [53]

    Generic Rules for High Temperature Dimensional Reduction and Their Application to the Standard Model

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B 458(1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [54]

    Effective Field Theory Approach to High-Temperature Thermodynamics

    E. Braaten and A. Nieto,Effective field theory approach to high temperature thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 6990 [hep-ph/9501375]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  55. [55]

    Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition at $m_H\gsim m_W$?

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  56. [56]

    Gould and J

    O. Gould and J. Hirvonen,Effective field theory approach to thermal bubble nucleation,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 096015 [2108.04377]. 66

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    L¨ ofgren, M

    J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Framework,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 251801 [2112.05472]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Hirvonen, J

    J. Hirvonen, J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory,JHEP07 (2022) 135 [2112.08912]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    On the perturbative expansion at high temperature and implications for cosmological phase transitions

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen,On the perturbative expansion at high temperature and impli- cations for cosmological phase transitions,JHEP06(2021) 069 [2104.04399]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    E. J. Weinberg,Vacuum decay in theories with symmetry breaking by radiative corrections,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4614 [hep-ph/9211314]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  61. [61]

    Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking

    D. Metaxas and E. J. Weinberg,Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 836 [hep-ph/9507381]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  62. [62]

    On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temperature

    M. Garny and T. Konstandin,On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temper- ature,JHEP07(2012) 189 [1205.3392]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Ekstedt, P

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096006 [2405.18349]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Higher-dimensional operators at finite-temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions

    F. Bernardo, P. Klose, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Higher-dimensional operators at finite temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions,JHEP08(2025) 109 [2503.18904]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Model Discrimination in Gravitational Wave spectra from Dark Phase Transitions

    D. Croon, V. Sanz, and G. White,Model Discrimination in Gravitational Wave spectra from Dark Phase Transitions,JHEP08(2018) 203 [1806.02332]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Higgs-field Portal into Hidden Sectors

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek,Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors,[hep-ph/0605188]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Secluded WIMP Dark Matter

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 53 [0711.4866]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  68. [68]

    Heavy Dark Matter Through the Higgs Portal

    J. March-Russell, S. M. West, D. Cumberbatch, and D. Hooper,Heavy Dark Matter Through the Higgs Portal,JHEP07(2008) 058 [0801.3440]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Galison and A

    P. Galison and A. Manohar,TWO Z’s OR NOT TWO Z’s?,Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 279

    1984

  70. [70]

    Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,Phys

    B. Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196

    1986

  71. [71]

    P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Updated BBN constraints on electromagnetic decays of MeV-scale particles,JCAP04(2021) 011 [2011.06519]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Escudero Abenza,Precision early universe thermodynamics made simple:N effand neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond,JCAP05(2020) 048 [2001.04466]

    M. Escudero Abenza,Precision early universe thermodynamics made simple:N effand neutrino decoupling in the Standard Model and beyond,JCAP05(2020) 048 [2001.04466]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright,The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set,Astrophys. J. 473(1996) 576 [astro-ph/9605054]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  74. [74]

    The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe

    J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev,The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419(2012) 1294 [1109.6552]. 67

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    Particle decays during the cosmic dark ages

    X.-L. Chen and M. Kamionkowski,Particle decays during the cosmic dark ages,Phys. Rev. D 70(2004) 043502 [astro-ph/0310473]. [85]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al.,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  76. [76]

    J. L. Feng and J. Kumar,The WIMPless Miracle: Dark-Matter Particles without Weak-Scale Masses or Weak Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 231301 [0803.4196]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    J. L. Feng, H. Tu, and H.-B. Yu,Thermal Relics in Hidden Sectors,JCAP10(2008) 043 [0808.2318]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    A Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner,A Theory of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 015014 [0810.0713]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane,Dark Forces in the Sky: Signals from Z’ and the Dark Higgs,JCAP08(2016) 001 [1605.09382]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    How to save the WIMP: global analysis of a dark matter model with two s-channel mediators

    M. Duerr, F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl,How to save the WIMP: global analysis of a dark matter model with two s-channel mediators,JHEP09(2016) 042 [1606.07609]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.