Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Classical Milky Way satellites show tidal features that MOND predicts and cold dark matter cannot.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 06:43 UTC pith:F24K2HCU

load-bearing objection Clean pericentric η ranking for the classical satellites that matches observed disturbance in MOND and not in CDM; the soft spot is imported thresholds, not the ranking itself. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05502 v1 pith:F24K2HCU submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.GA

The tidal features of the classical Milky Way satellites: Expected in MOND but inconsistent with cold dark matter models

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords MONDtidal susceptibilityclassical satellitesMilky Way dwarfsexternal field effectcold dark mattertidal featuresvelocity dispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most of the classical Milky Way satellites show clear signs of tidal disturbance: elongated shapes, outer stellar halos, substructure, and in some cases elevated velocity dispersions. Cold dark matter models surround those dwarfs with massive protective dark-matter halos, so their half-mass radii should sit well inside their tidal radii at pericentre and the systems should be resilient. This paper calculates that same tidal susceptibility ratio in both frameworks and finds the opposite for MOND: once the external-field effect is included, most classical satellites are expected to be at least mildly disturbed, and the three most susceptible (Draco, Ursa Minor, Sextans) lie near or above the instability threshold. The observed morphological and kinematic features line up with those MOND predictions, while remaining unexplained in the dark-matter picture. The result therefore offers a single dynamical reason why the satellites look disturbed and why some of them appear too hot for their baryonic masses.

Core claim

Comparing half-mass radius to theoretical tidal radius at pericentre shows that most classical satellites have tidal susceptibility η_MOND ≳ 0.4 (and Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans near or above ~1), so they are expected to be tidally perturbed in MOND and their observed tails, ellipticity, outer excesses and elevated dispersions match those expectations; the same satellites remain resilient (η_CDM ≤ 0.3) under cold dark matter.

What carries the argument

Tidal susceptibility η ≡ r_h,3D / r_tid evaluated at pericentre, with the MOND tidal radius incorporating the external-field effect that weakens the satellite’s self-gravity near the Milky Way.

Load-bearing premise

The thresholds that turn a given η into observable radius growth, ellipticity and velocity-dispersion boost are taken from earlier N-body runs of more massive Fornax-cluster dwarfs and are assumed to transfer to the lower-mass classical satellites.

What would settle it

Dedicated MOND N-body simulations of each classical satellite that start from its observed stellar mass, size and orbit and either recover the measured ellipticity, outer excess and velocity dispersion or fail to do so.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the tidal susceptibility η ≡ r_h,3D / r_tid at pericentre for the eight classical Milky Way satellites (excluding Sagittarius and the Magellanic Clouds) in both CDM and MOND. Using published distances, proper motions, stellar masses and velocity dispersions together with the QUMOND tidal-radius formula (Eq. 8) and a dynamical M⋆–M_DM relation (Eq. 7), it finds η_CDM ≤ 0.3 (resilient) while η_MOND ≳ 0.4 for all but Leo II (and η_MOND ≳ 0.8 for Draco, Ursa Minor and Sextans). These rankings are then compared with observed morphological and kinematic signatures (King radii, BTFR residuals, ellipticities, extra-tidal stars) and with the disturbance thresholds previously calibrated on MOND N-body runs, concluding that the observed tidal features are expected in MOND but inconsistent with CDM.

Significance. If the ranking and the mapping from η to observable disturbance hold, the work supplies a quantitative, falsifiable challenge to CDM for the best-studied Local Group dwarfs and simultaneously offers a natural explanation for both their tidal morphology and the elevated velocity dispersions of the most susceptible systems. Strengths include fully transparent orbital integrations with error propagation, explicit tables of η and r_tid (Tables 3–5), a conservative dynamical DM-fraction choice that still leaves CDM resilient, and an open discussion of alternative mass estimates and of the Júlio et al. (2025) analysis. The paper therefore constitutes a useful, data-driven contribution to the ongoing Local Group test of gravity models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 4.1, 5 and Appendix A] Sections 4.1, 5 and Appendix A: the quantitative claims of “good agreement” rest on the η thresholds (η_MOND ≳ 0.4 for stripping/ellipticity enhancement; η_MOND ≳ 1 for σ_v enhancement and instability) and the radial-oscillation behaviour taken from the higher-mass Fornax-cluster N-body suite of Asencio et al. (2022). The paper itself notes that e, g_ratio and t_peri also control the response and that dedicated simulations are still required; without a quantitative assessment of how those thresholds shift for the lower-mass, lower-acceleration classical satellites, the morphological and BTFR comparisons remain only directionally supportive rather than confirmatory.
  2. [Section 5.1, Fig. 2] Section 5.1 and Fig. 2: Fornax is the only object whose nominal Δr_tid is inconsistent with the expected near-zero expansion, although the large uncertainty on r_tid,MOND still allows consistency at 1σ. Because Fornax is the most massive classical satellite and the only one with a published dedicated MOND simulation (Bílek & Zhao 2025), this mild tension should be quantified more carefully (or shown to be resolved by the globular-cluster interactions already discussed) before the overall “good agreement” statement is retained at the present strength.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eqs. 5 and 8] Section 3.1 (Eqs. 5 and 8) and the comparison paragraph after Eq. 8: the Newtonian and MOND tidal radii are defined along different principal axes of the Roche lobe (r1 versus r2). The paper correctly notes that a factor 3/2 must be applied for direct numerical comparison, yet the subsequent discussion of η_CDM versus η_MOND and of the King-radius residuals does not consistently apply or propagate this geometric factor. Because the factor is of the same order as several of the reported η differences, it should be included (or shown to be negligible) in the tabulated values and in the figures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1 caption: the Plummer deprojection formula is written r_h,3D = r_h / √(4^{1/3}-1); the conventional factor is 1/√(2^{2/3}-1) ≈ 1.3. Clarify which convention is used and whether it affects the subsequent η values.
  2. [Section 2] Section 2: the solar motion (U,V,W) = (14.1,14.6,6.9) km s^{-1} is taken from Francis & Anderson (2014); a brief note on sensitivity to the more commonly adopted Schönrich et al. (2010) values would help readers assess robustness of the pericentre distances.
  3. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 and the accompanying text: the horizontal blue line at η_MOND ≈ 0.4 is described as the onset of both ellipticity enhancement and tidal stripping, yet the Asencio et al. (2022) suite only directly constrains the former. A short clarifying sentence would avoid conflating the two thresholds.
  4. [Appendix C] Appendix C: the isophote panels are useful but the figure captions do not uniformly state the source of the King radius over-plotted on each image; adding that information would make the visual comparison self-contained.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Partial circularity: load-bearing η–disturbance thresholds and radial/σ_v/ellipticity responses are imported from the authors’ own 2022 N-body suite without re-derivation; observational ranking and CDM comparison remain independent.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4.1 / Appendix A (reproducing Asencio et al. 2022 fig. 13)]
    "Since Asencio et al. (2022) presented their results in terms of the dwarfs’ η_MOND values—as in this study—we mainly focus on their simulations for our analysis. The results of their simulations are concisely displayed in their fig. 13. For an easier comparison, we have reproduced their fig. 13 in Appendix A. … The simulations of Asencio et al. (2022) estimate that the tidal susceptibility threshold at which a dwarf becomes unstable is η_MOND > 1.0 +0.0 −0.3."

    The quantitative thresholds that convert the paper’s computed η_MOND values into the claim ‘expected to be tidally perturbed / unstable / σ_v-enhanced’ are taken from the authors’ own prior N-body suite. No independent derivation or external calibration of those thresholds is supplied; the present paper simply imports them and maps the classical satellites onto them.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 4.1.1–4.1.3 and Section 5 (application of thresholds)]
    "Therefore, according to this model, only Ursa Minor, and possibly Draco and Sextans, should experience an enhancement of their σ_v with respect to tidally unperturbed dwarfs (see Fig. 1). … The squashing effect, i.e. the increase in their ellipticity, can already become appreciable at η_MOND ≈ 0.4 … From Bílek & Zhao (2025), we can infer that Fornax-like dwarfs (η_MOND ≈ 0.4) should already be tidally susceptible enough to experience tidal stripping in MOND."

    The statements that η_MOND ≳ 0.4 produces ellipticity enhancement and stripping, and that η_MOND ≳ 1 produces σ_v enhancement, are not re-derived; they are the direct application of the Asencio et al. (2022) thresholds (with a secondary Bílek & Zhao 2025 citation for stripping). The ‘good agreement with MOND expectations’ claim therefore rests on those self-sourced thresholds.

  3. self citation load bearing [Section 3.1 (Eq. 7) and Section 6.2]
    "This led to the following M⋆ − M_DM relation (eq. 1 in Asencio et al. 2025): log10(M_DM/M⋆ + 1) = 4.089 − 0.396 log10(M⋆/M⊙). … Therefore, our nominal total dwarf mass (M_tot,CDM) for the CDM paradigm was obtained under the assumption of a Newtonian gravitational law and of a DM mass fraction consistent with that of isolated dwarf galaxies in the Local Group."

    The M⋆–M_DM relation used for the nominal CDM η values is taken from the authors’ own prior work (Asencio et al. 2022/2025). While the paper also checks the more conservative M_dyn choice (Table 5) and finds CDM still resilient, the primary CDM comparison that appears in the abstract and conclusions uses this self-sourced mass–mass relation.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim is that classical MW satellites have η_MOND ≳ 0.4 (and three near/above the instability threshold) so their observed tidal features match MOND, while η_CDM ≤ 0.3 implies resilience. The ranking itself (Tables 3–4) is computed from independent observational inputs (Pace et al. 2022, McConnachie & Venn 2020, published King radii) plus the QUMOND tidal-radius formula (Eq. 8) and the dynamical M⋆–MDM relation (Eq. 7). That part is not circular. What is load-bearing and self-sourced is the mapping from those η values onto expected morphological/kinematic responses: the thresholds η_MOND ≳ 0.4 for stripping/ellipticity and η_MOND ≳ 1 for σ_v enhancement/instability, plus the radial-oscillation behaviour for e ≳ 0.3, are taken directly from Asencio et al. (2022) fig. 13 (reproduced as Appendix A) without new derivation or external calibration. The paper itself notes that e, g_ratio and t_peri also matter and that dedicated simulations are still required. Because the observational comparison and the CDM side remain independent, the circularity is partial (score 4) rather than definitional.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard MOND ingredients (a0, simple interpolating function, EFE), a fixed MW baryonic mass, a mass-to-light ratio of 2, and the transfer of η-thresholds from earlier cluster-scale simulations. No new free parameters are fitted to the classical-satellite data themselves; the CDM comparison uses an empirical M⋆–MDM relation calibrated on isolated Local-Group dwarfs rather than a simulation abundance-matching relation.

free parameters (4)
  • a0
    Fixed to the conventional 1.2e-10 m s^-2; not re-fitted here but the entire MOND boost depends on it.
  • MW baryonic mass Mb,MW
    Set to 6.7e10 M⊙ (Banik & Zhao 2018b); controls the external field and therefore every r_tid,MOND.
  • stellar mass-to-light ratio
    Fixed at 2 (Telford et al. 2020) to convert MV to M⋆; directly scales every dwarf’s self-gravity.
  • η instability threshold
    Taken as 1.0 +0.0/-0.3 from Asencio et al. 2022 simulations; used to decide which dwarfs should show elevated σv.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption QUMOND with the simple interpolating function correctly describes the Galactic potential and the internal dynamics of the satellites once the EFE is included.
    Invoked throughout §§2–3 and Eqs. 1–3, 8; the entire MOND column of Tables 3–4 rests on it.
  • domain assumption The dynamical M⋆–MDM relation measured for isolated Local-Group dwarfs (Asencio et al. 2022 fig. 16 / 2025 erratum) is the appropriate CDM mass for classical satellites.
    Used to construct Mtot,CDM and therefore η_CDM (Eq. 7, Table 3); the paper also tests the more conservative Mdyn case.
  • ad hoc to paper η thresholds and radial-oscillation behaviour calibrated on Fornax-cluster-mass N-body runs apply to classical MW satellites.
    Explicitly adopted in §4.1 and Appendix A; the paper notes that dedicated lower-mass simulations are still needed.
  • domain assumption Observed morphological and kinematic features (King radii, ellipticities, extra-tidal stars, BTFR outliers) are primarily tidal rather than merger- or feedback-driven.
    Underpins the entire comparison in §5; alternative explanations are discussed but not quantitatively modelled.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 40011 in / 3193 out tokens · 29355 ms · 2026-07-11T06:43:17.899027+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Most classical satellites of the Milky Way are known to display signs of tidal disturbance (e.g. tidal tails, substructures, and distorted shapes). This cannot be explained by the standard model of cosmology due to its prediction that the dark matter haloes of the classical satellites confer them with very strong self-gravity and make them resilient to the Milky Way's gravitational tides. In this work, we estimate the tidal susceptibility of the classical satellites by comparing their half-mass radius with their theoretical tidal radius at pericentre in both the standard model and in the Milgromian dynamics (MOND) model. With this approach, we demonstrate that most classical satellites are expected to be tidally perturbed in MOND, so their observed tidal features are generally in good agreement with MOND expectations. Since gravitational tides can also enhance the velocity dispersion of the satellites, we argue that MOND can plausibly explain the unusually high velocity dispersions reported for some of the classical satellites.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05502 by Elena Asencio, Indranil Banik, Pavel Kroupa.

Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: fig. 13. For an easier comparison, we have reproduced their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarises the predicted properties of the con￾sidered classical satellites in the MOND model. According to this, the radius of Draco, Ursa Minor, Leo I, Leo II, Sculptor, and Sextans oscillated throughout their trajec￾tory. Among these, only Ursa Minor, and possibly Draco and Sextans, are in the unstable regime, which means that they are not expected to recover their previous apocen￾tric rh,3D value in th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper panel: Comparison of the observed King tidal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Circular velocity and stellar mass of the classical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ellipticity of the classical satellites ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sitzungsberichte der K

    Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der K

  2. [2]

    Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A , year = 1920, volume = 220, pages =

    A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A , year = 1920, volume = 220, pages =. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009 , adsurl =

  3. [3]

    ApJ , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =

    A spiral nebula as a stellar system, Messier 31. ApJ , year = 1929, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1086/143167 , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    Helvetica Physica Acta , year = 1933, month = jan, volume =

    Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln. Helvetica Physica Acta , year = 1933, month = jan, volume =

  5. [5]

    ApJ , year = 1937, month = oct, volume = 86, pages =

    On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae. ApJ , year = 1937, month = oct, volume = 86, pages =. doi:10.1086/143864 , adsurl =

  6. [6]

    ApJ , year = 1959, month = nov, volume = 130, pages =

    Intergalactic Matter and the Galaxy. ApJ , year = 1959, month = nov, volume = 130, pages =. doi:10.1086/146762 , adsurl =

  7. [7]

    Astrofizika , year = 1970, month = jan, volume =

    The space structure of perturbations and the origin of rotation of galaxies in the theory of fluctuation. Astrofizika , year = 1970, month = jan, volume =

  8. [8]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 , adsurl =

  9. [9]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Angular momentum growth in protogalaxies. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/162573 , adsurl =

  10. [10]

    Physical Review Letters , keywords =

    Experimental tests of the 'invisible' axion. Physical Review Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1415 , adsurl =

  11. [11]

    High Energy Physics and Cosmology, 1997 Summer School , year = 1998, eprint =

    WIMP and Axion Dark Matter. High Energy Physics and Cosmology, 1997 Summer School , year = 1998, eprint =

  12. [12]

    Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 1958, month = jan, volume = 284, pages =

    Verzeichnis von 62 O-und B-Sterngruppen. Astronomische Nachrichten , year = 1958, month = jan, volume = 284, pages =

  13. [13]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/162570 , adsurl =

  14. [14]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Isothermal spheres in the modified dynamics. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/162716 , adsurl =

  15. [15]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    The fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03272.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9907326 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    A&A , keywords =

    Remarks on the properties of elliptical galaxies in modified Newtonian dynamics. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116531 , archivePrefix =. 1103.3040 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    A dynamical model of the local cosmic expansion. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu879 , adsurl =

  18. [18]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    A timing constraint on the (total) mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv160 , adsurl =

  19. [19]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    What galaxy masses perturb the local cosmic expansion?. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx323 , archivePrefix =. 1609.07147 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    Lowell Observatory Bulletin , year = 1913, volume = 2, pages =

    The radial velocity of the Andromeda Nebula. Lowell Observatory Bulletin , year = 1913, volume = 2, pages =

  21. [21]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Inferring the Andromeda Galaxy's mass from its giant southern stream with Bayesian simulation sampling. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1121 , adsurl =

  22. [22]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    The need for speed: escape velocity and dynamical mass measurements of the Andromeda galaxy. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty082 , archivePrefix =. 1801.03949 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Milky Way total Mass derived by Rotation Curve and Globular Cluster kinematics from Gaia EDR3. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3258 , adsurl =

  24. [24]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Dark Matter Halo Masses from Abundance Matching and Kinematics: Tensions for the Milky Way and M31. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abe1ba , adsurl =

  25. [25]

    MNRAS , eprint =

    Resolving the mystery of the dwarf galaxy HIZSS003. MNRAS , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00040.x , adsurl =

  26. [26]

    AJ , eprint =

    The Local Group and Other Neighboring Galaxy Groups. AJ , eprint =. doi:10.1086/426368 , adsurl =

  27. [27]

    Astrophysics , keywords =

    Masses of the local group and of the M81 group estimated from distortions in the local velocity field. Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10511-006-0002-6 , adsurl =

  28. [28]

    PASA , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Distance to NGC 5128 (Centaurus A). PASA , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1071/AS09061 , adsurl =

  29. [29]

    ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    A Study of Cepheids in M81 with the Large Binocular Telescope (Efficiently Calibrated with Hubble Space Telescope). ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/176 , adsurl =

  30. [30]

    A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galactic kinematics with modified Newtonian dynamics. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200809978 , adsurl =

  31. [31]

    Constraints on the local dark matter density

    The vertical force in the solar neighbourhood using red clump stars in TGAS and RAVE. Constraints on the local dark matter density. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832903 , archivePrefix =. 1802.09291 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Physical Review D , keywords =

    Testing dark matter and modifications to gravity using local Milky Way observables. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083009 , archivePrefix =. 1812.08169 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    The tilt of the velocity ellipsoid in the Milky Way with Gaia DR2

    The tilt of the velocity ellipsoid in the Milky Way with Gaia DR2. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935264 , archivePrefix =. 1902.05268 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    The Tilt of the Local Velocity Ellipsoid as Seen by Gaia

    The tilt of the local velocity ellipsoid as seen by Gaia. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2217 , archivePrefix =. 1904.08460 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Measuring the local dark matter density with LAMOST DR5 and Gaia DR2. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1483 , archivePrefix =. 2005.12018 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Tracing the Dynamical Mass in Galaxy Disks Using HI Velocity Dispersion and its Implications for the Dark Matter Distribution in Galaxies. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fcd , adsurl =

  37. [37]

    AJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Infrared Tip of the Red Giant Branch and Distances to the Maffei/IC 342 Group. AJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/1/7 , adsurl =

  38. [38]

    A past Milky Way-Andromeda encounter at z 0.8

    Local Group timing in Milgromian dynamics. A past Milky Way-Andromeda encounter at z 0.8. A&A , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321879 , adsurl =

  39. [39]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Galactic rotation and solar motion from stellar kinematics. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21631.x , adsurl =

  40. [40]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Local kinematics and the local standard of rest. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16253.x , adsurl =

  41. [41]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Mass models of the Milky Way. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18564.x , adsurl =

  42. [42]

    Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The local standard of rest and the well in the velocity distribution. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1007/s10569-014-9541-z , adsurl =

  43. [43]

    AJ , eprint =

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary. AJ , eprint =. doi:10.1086/301513 , adsurl =

  44. [44]

    Astronomy & Geophysics , keywords =

    GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation. Astronomy & Geophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2009.50512.x , archivePrefix =. 0910.5123 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18188.x , archivePrefix =. 1009.0614 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The remnants of galaxy formation from a panoramic survey of the region around M31. Nature , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1038/nature08327 , adsurl =

  47. [47]

    The Large-scale Structure of the Halo of the Andromeda Galaxy. II. Hierarchical Structure in the Pan-Andromeda Archaeological Survey. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e7 , archivePrefix =. 1810.08234 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    A Vast Thin Plane of Co-rotating Dwarf Galaxies Orbiting the Andromeda Galaxy

    A vast, thin plane of corotating dwarf galaxies orbiting the Andromeda galaxy. Nature , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature11717 , archivePrefix =. 1301.0446 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    ApJ , keywords =

    HST Proper Motions of NGC 147 and NGC 185: Orbital Histories and Test of Dynamically Coherent Andromeda Satellite Plane. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaf49 , adsurl =

  50. [50]

    On the Co-Orbitation of Satellite Galaxies Along the Great Plane of Andromeda: NGC 147, NGC 185, and Expectations from Cosmological Simulations

    On the Co-orbitation of Satellite Galaxies along the Great Plane of Andromeda: NGC 147, NGC 185, and Expectations from Cosmological Simulations. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2aa9 , archivePrefix =. 2109.13253 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    Towards a new paradigm for structure formation

    Local-Group tests of dark-matter concordance cosmology . Towards a new paradigm for structure formation. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014892 , archivePrefix =. 1006.1647 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    PASA , keywords =

    The Dark Matter Crisis: Falsification of the Current Standard Model of Cosmology. PASA , keywords =. doi:10.1071/AS12005 , archivePrefix =. 1204.2546 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    How common is the Milky Way-satellite system alignment?. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15315.x , archivePrefix =. 0905.1696 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Mismatch and misalignment: dark haloes and satellites of disc galaxies. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18884.x , archivePrefix =. 1101.0816 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The rotationally stabilized VPOS and predicted proper motions of the Milky Way satellite galaxies. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1429 , adsurl =

  56. [56]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Understanding the internal dynamics of elliptical galaxies without non-baryonic dark matter. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2001 , adsurl =

  57. [57]

    MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Co-orbiting satellite galaxy structures are still in conflict with the distribution of primordial dwarf galaxies. MNRAS , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1005 , adsurl =

  58. [58]

    The Milky Way's Disk of Classical Satellite Galaxies in Light of Gaia DR2

    The Milky Way's disc of classical satellite galaxies in light of Gaia DR2. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3163 , archivePrefix =. 1911.05081 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    An updated detailed characterization of planes of satellites in the MW and M31

    An updated detailed characterization of planes of satellites in the MW and M31. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3130 , archivePrefix =. 2010.08624 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Dwarf Spheroidal Satellite Galaxies without Dark Matter: Results from Two Different Numerical Techniques. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/305540 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9711350 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Dwarf spheroidal satellites of the Milky Way from dark matter free tidal dwarf galaxy progenitors: maps of orbits. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21319.x , archivePrefix =. 1205.5029 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    A&A , keywords =

    The great disk of Milky-Way satellites and cosmological sub-structures. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041122 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410421 , primaryClass =

  63. [63]

    Nature , keywords =

    Formation of dwarf galaxies in tidal tails. Nature , keywords =. doi:10.1038/360715a0 , adsurl =

  64. [64]

    ApJ , keywords =

    An Interaction Model for the Formation of Dwarf Galaxies and 10 8 M _ sun Clouds in Spiral Disks. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172903 , adsurl =

  65. [65]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Do dwarf galaxies form in tidal tails?. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11360.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0510821 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Tidal dwarf galaxies in the nearby Universe. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19673.x , archivePrefix =. 1108.4410 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    Tidal Dwarf Galaxies: Disc Formation at ( z 0 ). Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies3040184 , archivePrefix =. 1511.00689 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    Missing Mass in Collisional Debris from Galaxies

    Missing Mass in Collisional Debris from Galaxies. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1142114 , archivePrefix =. 0705.1356 , primaryClass =

  69. [69]

    A&A , keywords =

    Tidal dwarf galaxies as a test of fundamental physics. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078081 , archivePrefix =. 0706.1976 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    ApJL , keywords =

    MOND and the Mass Discrepancies in Tidal Dwarf Galaxies. ApJL , keywords =. doi:10.1086/522049 , archivePrefix =. 0706.0875 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Young tidal dwarf galaxies cannot be used to probe dark matter in galaxies. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv189 , archivePrefix =. 1512.02227 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Tidal dwarf galaxies in cosmological simulations. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2787 , archivePrefix =. 1710.09380 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    Galaxies lacking dark matter in the Illustris simulation

    Galaxies lacking dark matter in the Illustris simulation. A&A , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833771 , archivePrefix =. 1905.03258 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    The ultra-diffuse dwarf galaxies NGC 1052-DF2 and 1052-DF4 are in conflict with standard cosmology

    The ultra-diffuse dwarf galaxies NGC 1052-DF2 and 1052-DF4 are in conflict with standard cosmology. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2270 , archivePrefix =. 1909.04663 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Dark Matter Deficient Galaxies Produced via High-velocity Galaxy Collisions in High-resolution Numerical Simulations. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba434 , archivePrefix =. 2007.09889 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    Galaxies lacking dark matter produced by close encounters in a cosmological simulation

    Galaxies lacking dark matter produced by close encounters in a cosmological simulation. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01598-4 , archivePrefix =. 2202.05836 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Dwarf elliptical galaxies as ancient tidal dwarf galaxies. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts326 , archivePrefix =. 1211.1382 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    Identification of old tidal dwarfs near early-type galaxies from deep imaging and H I observations. MNRAS , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu330 , archivePrefix =. 1403.0626 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    ApJ , keywords =

    Andromeda Dwarfs in Light of Modified Newtonian Dynamics. ApJ , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/22 , archivePrefix =. 1301.0822 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    Andromeda Dwarfs in Light of MOND. II. Testing Prior Predictions. ApJ , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/139 , adsurl =

Showing first 80 references.