The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.06203 · v1 · pith:HZIL2ZWE · submitted 2026-07-07 · hep-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-lat· hep-th

Polyakov Loops Tame Phase Transitions

Lisa Biermann , Joydeep Chakrabortty , Christoph Englert This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 13:20 UTCglm-5.2pith:HZIL2ZWErecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lathep-th
keywords Polyakov loopelectroweak phase transitionthermal effective potentialgravitational wavesfirst-order phase transitionfinite-temperature field theoryMatsubara modesbubble nucleation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polyakov loops soften electroweak phase transitions

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the Polyakov loop—a topologically unavoidable feature of thermal gauge field theory, arising from the holonomy of the gauge field around the compactified Euclidean time circle—modifies the finite-temperature effective potential in a way that systematically weakens first-order electroweak phase transitions. The authors incorporate the Polyakov loop into the standard thermal effective potential by introducing a parameter n~ (tilde-n) that shifts all Matsubara modes by a non-integer amount, replacing the usual closed-form thermal functions J_B and J_F with series involving modified Bessel functions weighted by cos(2πn n~). When n~ = 0 the standard perturbative results are recovered exactly. Applying this modified potential to an SU(2) toy model with a scalar in the fundamental representation, the authors show that increasing n~ monotonically reduces the phase-transition strength parameter ξ_c, shrinks the gap between critical and nucleation temperatures, lowers the gravitational-wave signal-to-noise ratio, and—for sufficiently large n~—removes the potential barrier entirely, converting a first-order transition into a second-order transition or smooth crossover. The effect holds for both bosonic and fermionic contributions to the effective potential.

Core claim

The central mechanism is that a non-zero Polyakov-loop parameter n~ introduces odd-powered field-dependent mass terms into the thermal effective potential, which shift the high-temperature minimum away from the origin and simultaneously reduce the barrier separating the true and false vacua. This geometrically softens the phase transition: the barrier height drops, the discontinuity in the vacuum expectation value at the critical temperature shrinks, and beyond a threshold value of n~ the barrier disappears, yielding a continuous (second-order or crossover) transition rather than a first-order one. The authors demonstrate this in a concrete SU(2) toy model benchmark point where ξ_c drops mon

What carries the argument

The paper modifies the standard finite-temperature characteristic functions J_B(m,β) and J_F(m,β)—the building blocks of all perturbative phase-transition codes—by replacing them with n~-dependent versions J_B(m,β,n~) and J_F(m,β,n~) built from the series S^n~_Ω(m,β) = (m²/π²β²) Σ_{n=1}^∞ (1/n²) cos(2πn n~) K₂(mnβ), where K₂ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. The parameter n~ = i⟨A₀⟩β/(2π) encodes the background temporal gauge field holonomy. This modification is implemented in the BSMPT code and applied to an SU(2) gauge theory with a complex scalar doublet, optionally extended with chiral fermions (top/bottom-like), to trace phase-transition strength ξ_c, nucleation/percol

If this is right

  • Models beyond the Standard Model that predict strong first-order electroweak phase transitions—and corresponding gravitational-wave signals detectable by LISA—may need to be re-evaluated once Polyakov-loop effects are consistently included, as parameter regions previously identified as giving first-order transitions could shift to crossovers.
  • The gravitational-wave signal-to-noise ratio from electroweak-scale phase transitions is suppressed when n~ > 0, because the transition weakens (lower α) and completes faster (higher β/H), both of which reduce the GW amplitude. This could narrow the observational prospects for LISA and other space-based interferometers.
  • Existing perturbative phase-transition codes (BSMPT, PhaseTracer, etc.) can incorporate Polyakov-loop effects by a direct substitution of the modified J_B/J_F functions, making the correction straightforward to deploy across many BSM scenarios.
  • If the Polyakov-loop value is dynamically determined by minimizing the full effective potential with respect to both the scalar background and the gauge-field background, the resulting n~ may vary with temperature, potentially introducing new critical behavior or modifying the order of the transition in ways not captured by a constant n~ scan.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper treats n~ as a free phenomenological parameter, but the physical value is set by a dual minimization of V_eff(φ, A₀) with respect to both the scalar field and the temporal gauge field. If this minimization generically yields small n~ for electroweak-scale transitions (as might be expected when dynamical matter is present and the confined-phase condition Ω = 0 does not hold), the taming e
  • The connection between n~ and the imaginary chemical potential (Eq. A.2) suggests that the Polyakov-loop effect could be reinterpreted as a thermal effective operator in the SMEFT at finite temperature, with n~ entering the Wilson coefficients. This would allow a systematic power-counting of Polyakov-loop corrections alongside other higher-dimensional thermal operators.
  • If n~ is temperature-dependent (as it should be in a full treatment where the gauge-field background evolves with the thermal bath), the phase-transition dynamics could become richer than a simple monotonic softening—there could be temperature windows where the barrier reappears or the transition strengthens, depending on how n~(T) tracks the changing plasma conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper treats n~ as a free constant parameter rather than computing it by minimizing the effective potential with respect to the background gauge field. The claim that Polyakov loops tame phase transitions relies on scanning n~ > 0, but the actual physical value of n~ for a given model is not determined. If the true vacuum structure forces n~ to be zero or very small, the taming effect vanishes.

What would settle it

Compute the full dual minimization of V_eff(φ, A₀) with respect to both the scalar background and the temporal gauge field for a realistic BSM model. If the dynamically determined n~ is zero or negligibly small for electroweak-scale temperatures, the entire taming mechanism identified in this paper has no physical effect.

read the original abstract

We estimate the impact of Polyakov loop (PL) contributions on electroweak phase transitions (PTs). We show that the PL, which is unavoidable in thermal gauge field theory, tends to tame thermal contributions, thereby softening electroweak PTs and affecting bubble dynamics, nucleation, and the related gravitational-wave spectrum. Including this non-perturbative contribution in perturbative approaches results in a thermal effective potential that disfavours first-order PTs over either second-order PTs or smooth cross-overs. This feature is universal for both fermionic and bosonic contributions to the effective potential.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies the impact of Polyakov loop (PL) contributions on the thermal effective potential governing electroweak phase transitions (PTs). Using the Heat-Kernel method, the authors derive PL-modified characteristic finite-temperature functions J_B/F(m, β, ñ) that reduce to the standard forms for ñ = 0 and can be straightforwardly integrated into existing numerical tools (BSMPT). The modified potential is applied to an SU(2) toy model with a fundamental scalar, demonstrating that increasing ñ monotonically softens first-order PTs—reducing the PT strength ξ_c, the barrier height, and the gravitational-wave signal-to-noise ratio—and can convert first-order transitions into second-order ones or crossovers. Fermionic contributions are shown to follow a qualitatively similar pattern. The derivation of the PL-modified potential is standard and correctly recovers known limits; the central phenomenological claim is supported by the numerical case study.

Significance. The paper provides a practical and economical prescription for incorporating Polyakov loop effects into perturbative thermal effective potentials via modified J_B/F functions, with a concrete BSMPT implementation. The monotonic softening of PTs with increasing ñ is a robust qualitative finding. The toy model is explicitly acknowledged as illustrative (M_h = 46 GeV), and the authors are transparent that ñ is treated as a free phenomenological parameter rather than dynamically determined. The falsifiable prediction—that PL contributions suppress GW SNR—is a useful concrete result. The work is a reasonable first step toward incorporating non-perturbative plasma correlations into existing perturbative frameworks.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 2 (p. 5) and abstract: The paper's central claim—that PLs 'tame' phase transitions—is demonstrated by scanning ñ as a free parameter. The authors acknowledge (Sec. 2, p. 5) that the self-consistent value should satisfy δV_eff/δφ = δV_eff/δÂ₀ = 0, but do not perform this minimisation. This is the load-bearing assumption: if the equilibrium value of ñ at T_c is very small (as might be expected in a deconfined plasma at electroweak temperatures, where center symmetry is explicitly broken by dynamical matter), the demonstrated softening effect could be physically negligible. The paper should either (a) perform the dual minimisation for the toy model to check whether ñ ~ 0.02–0.08 is self-consistent, or (b) more prominently flag this as a conditional result and discuss what model features (e.g., additional matter fields, near-confinement dynamics) could plausibly yield non-negligiblen
  2. Sec. 2 (p. 5, discussion following Eq. 2.13): The paper states that 'models containing additional non-SM matter fields with non-zero gauge charges will acquire significant contributions from PLs' (Sec. 4), but does not substantiate this claim. A brief discussion of which classes of BSM models could yield ñ in the phenomenologically relevant range—beyond the general statement about additional matter fields—would strengthen the bridge between the toy model and the claimed phenomenological relevance. Without this, the results remain a purely conditional demonstration.
minor comments (6)
  1. Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.12): The benchmark M_h = 46 GeV is far from the SM Higgs mass. While the authors justify this as maximising the first-order PT parameter space, a brief comment on how the qualitative conclusions would change for more realistic Higgs masses (even if the PT is already crossover in the SM) would help the reader gauge generality.
  2. Fig. 1, left panel: The potential contours are normalised to the ñ = 0 barrier height, but the absolute scale is not shown. Including the unnormalised values or stating them in the caption would help the reader assess the physical magnitude of the barrier reduction.
  3. Sec. 3.2, Fig. 4 table: The table caption is missing; the reader must infer from the main text that the numbers in brackets correspond to g = 1. A standalone caption or a clearer label would improve readability when consulting the table alone.
  4. App. A, Eq. (A.1): The expansion parameter φ = [2πñ] mod(2π) is introduced, but the range of validity of this expansion relative to the truncated series used in the numerical implementation (n ≃ 600) is not discussed. A brief comment on when the analytical expansion is useful versus the series would be helpful.
  5. Sec. 2, footnote 8: The constraint ñ < 1 is stated without detailed justification beyond the solutions in Tab. 1. A one-sentence explanation of the physical origin of this bound would be useful.
  6. The paper would benefit from a brief quantitative statement of the convergence of the truncated series (Eq. 2.11) at n ≃ 600, e.g., the fractional change in ξ_c when increasing the truncation to n = 1000, to confirm that the claimed numerical accuracy is adequate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The referee correctly identifies the central assumption of our work—the treatment of ñ as a phenomenological parameter rather than a self-consistently determined quantity—and raises two related points about (i) the need to either perform the dual minimisation or more prominently flag the conditional nature of the result, and (ii) the need for a more specific discussion of which BSM scenarios could yield phenomenologically relevant ñ. We address both points below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Sec. 2 (p. 5) and abstract: The paper's central claim—that PLs 'tame' phase transitions—is demonstrated by scanning ñ as a free parameter. The authors acknowledge (Sec. 2, p. 5) that the self-consistent value should satisfy δV_eff/δφ = δV_eff/δÂ₀ = 0, but do not perform this minimisation. This is the load-bearing assumption: if the equilibrium value of ñ at T_c is very small (as might be expected in a deconfined plasma at electroweak temperatures, where center symmetry is explicitly broken by dynamical matter), the demonstrated softening effect could be physically negligible. The paper should either (a) perform the dual minimisation for the toy model to check whether ñ ~ 0.02–0.08 is self-consistent, or (b) more prominently flag this as a conditional result and discuss what model features (e.g., additional matter fields, near-confinement dynamics) could plausibly yield non-negligible

    Authors: The referee is correct that the self-consistent determination of ñ via dual minimisation is the load-bearing assumption of our phenomenological analysis, and we agree that this must be more prominently flagged. We have revised the manuscript to address this in two ways. First, we have added a prominent caveat in both the abstract and the introduction stating explicitly that ñ is treated as a free phenomenological parameter and that the quantitative results are conditional on the self-consistent equilibrium value being non-negligible. Second, we have expanded the discussion in Sec. 2 (following Eq. 2.13) and in Sec. 4 to address the physics that governs the equilibrium value of ñ. We note the following: In the deconfined phase at electroweak temperatures, where center symmetry is explicitly broken by dynamical matter in the fundamental representation, the equilibrium Polyakov loop is indeed expected to be non-zero but potentially small—this is precisely the regime where our scan is relevant. The key point is that the magnitude of ñ depends sensitively on the matter content and gauge dynamics. In theories with additional matter fields carrying gauge charges (particularly in higher representations or in models with near-confinement dynamics, such as semi-QGP-like scenarios as discussed by Pisarski [44, 66]), the equilibrium ñ can be parametrically larger. Regarding option (a): performing the full dual minimisation δV_eff/δφ = δV_eff/δÂ₀ = 0 for the toy model is a well-defined but non-trivial calculation that requires including the gauge-field contribution to the effective potential (the A₀-dependent part beyond the matter loops), which we have not included in the present analysis. We have added a discussion of this point and identified it as the primary target for the revision: partial

  2. Referee: Sec. 2 (p. 5, discussion following Eq. 2.13): The paper states that 'models containing additional non-SM matter fields with non-zero gauge charges will acquire significant contributions from PLs' (Sec. 4), but does not substantiate this claim. A brief discussion of which classes of BSM models could yield ñ in the phenomenologically relevant range—beyond the general statement about additional matter fields—would strengthen the bridge between the toy model and the claimed phenomenological relevance. Without this, the results remain a purely conditional demonstration.

    Authors: We agree that this claim should be substantiated with concrete examples. We have added a discussion in Sec. 4 identifying several classes of BSM scenarios where non-negligible ñ values are plausible: (i) Models with additional scalar or fermionic fields in higher-dimensional representations of the electroweak gauge group, where the PL contribution scales with the representation and can be parametrically enhanced. (ii) Models featuring additional non-Abelian gauge sectors (e.g., dark gauge groups) with matter fields charged under both the electroweak and dark gauge groups, where each gauge factor contributes its own PL and the combined effect can be significant, particularly if the dark sector has near-confinement dynamics. (iii) Semi-QGP-like scenarios [44, 66] where the plasma is in a partially confined regime, leading to intermediate ñ values between the confined (ñ ~ 1/N) and deconfined (ñ → 0) limits. (iv) Models with a large number of additional matter fields, where the collective contribution to the A₀-dependent effective potential can shift the equilibrium ñ to larger values. We emphasise that a quantitative determination of ñ in any specific model requires the dual minimisation discussed above, and we have adjusted the language in Sec. 4 to make clear that these are scenarios where non-negligible ñ is plausible rather than guaranteed. We agree that without this discussion, the bridge from the toy model to phenomenological relevance is incomplete. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper's derivation is self-contained given the free parameter ñ, and the 'taming' effect follows from the modified thermal functions rather than being forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation chain is not circular. The modified characteristic functions J_B/F(m, β, ñ) in Eqs. (2.10)/(2.15) are derived from the heat-kernel method (Eq. 2.7) with the Polyakov loop parameter ñ entering via the shifted Matsubara modes (n + ñ). The 'taming' of phase transitions—reduction of ξ_c with increasing ñ—is a genuine dynamical consequence of evaluating the effective potential V_eff(φ, ñ) at different ñ values, not a tautology. The paper does not fit ñ to the PT strength and then 'predict' that same strength; rather, it scans ñ as an external parameter and computes the resulting PT dynamics independently via BSMPT. The self-citations (Refs. [48, 49, 59, 69, 70]) provide the theoretical framework for the heat-kernel derivation and gauge-invariant effective potential, but these are methodological foundations, not circular inputs that define the output. The key physical concern—that ñ is treated as a free phenomenological parameter rather than self-consistently determined by minimizing V_eff with respect to both φ and Â₀—is explicitly acknowledged by the authors (Sec. 2: 'we will treat ñ as a free constant parameter'). This is a legitimate modeling choice and a correctness/physical-validity concern, not a circularity: the results are conditional statements ('if ñ takes these values, then...'), and the antecedent is not assumed to be true by construction. The paper does not claim to predict the value of ñ from first principles; it demonstrates the sensitivity of PT phenomenology to PL contributions. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by definition or by fitted-parameter renaming. The one minor self-citation load (Refs. [48, 49] for the heat-kernel effective potential with PL) is not load-bearing for the circularity of the central claim, as the modified J functions can be independently verified from Eq. (2.7). Score 1 reflects the minor self-citation dependency on the derivation framework without any reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The main free parameter is n~, which is not fitted to data but scanned phenomenologically. The key ad-hoc assumption is treating n~ as a free parameter rather than computing it dynamically.

free parameters (1)
  • n~ (Polyakov loop parameter) = scanned: {0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.0548, 0.08}
    Treated as a free phenomenological constant parametrizing the plasma, rather than dynamically determined by minimizing the potential.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The Polyakov loop contribution can be included perturbatively by modifying the characteristic J functions with a constant n~ shift.
    Sec 2, Eq 2.10/2.15. Assumes the background gauge field A0 is constant and its effect is fully captured by n~.
  • ad hoc to paper The physical value of n~ is non-zero and can be treated as a free parameter for phenomenological exploration.
    Sec 2: 'we will treat n~ as a free constant parameter'. This bypasses the need to solve delta V_eff / delta A0 = 0.
  • domain assumption The toy model with Mh=46 GeV and v=180 GeV captures relevant features of electroweak PTs.
    Sec 3.1. The authors state this is to maximize the parameter space for first-order PTs, deliberately ignoring experimental constraints.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 22198 in / 1917 out tokens · 373671 ms · 2026-07-08T13:20:08.692721+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 67 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32–35

    work page 1967

  2. [2]

    C. L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 2006–2013, [arXiv:1109.4189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    BSMPT - Beyond the Standard Model Phase Transitions -A Tool for the Electroweak Phase Transition in Extended Higgs Sectors

    P. Basler and M. M¨ uhlleitner,BSMPT (Beyond the Standard Model Phase Transitions): A tool for the electroweak phase transition in extended Higgs sectors,Comput. Phys. Commun.237(2019) 62–85, [arXiv:1803.02846]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    PhaseTracer: tracing cosmological phases and calculating transition properties

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, and Y. Zhang,PhaseTracer: tracing cosmological phases and calculating transition properties,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 6 567, [arXiv:2003.02859]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    BSMPT v2 A Tool for the Electroweak Phase Transition and the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in Extended Higgs Sectors

    P. Basler, M. M¨ uhlleitner, and J. M¨ uller,BSMPT v2 a tool for the electroweak phase transition and the baryon asymmetry of the universe in extended Higgs Sectors,Comput. Phys. Commun.269(2021) 108124, [arXiv:2007.01725]. – 15 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    DRalgo: a package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,DRalgo: A package for effective field theory approach for thermal phase transitions,Comput. Phys. Commun.288(2023) 108725, [arXiv:2205.08815]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    DRansitions

    P. Schicho and D. Schmitt, “DRansitions.” https://github.com/DMGW-Goethe/DRansitions

    work page

  8. [8]

    BSMPT v3 A Tool for Phase Transitions and Primordial Gravitational Waves in Extended Higgs Sectors

    P. Basler, L. Biermann, M. M¨ uhlleitner, J. M¨ uller, R. Santos, and J. Viana,BSMPT v3 a tool for phase transitions and primordial gravitational waves in extended Higgs sectors,Comput. Phys. Commun.316(2025) 109766, [arXiv:2404.19037]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, W. Searle, Y. Xiao, and Y. Zhang,PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 5 559, [arXiv:2412.04881]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Brdar, M

    V. Brdar, M. Finetti, M. Matteini, A. P. Morais, and M. Nemevˇ sek,PT2GWFinder : A package for cosmological first-order phase transitions and gravitational waves,Comput. Phys. Commun.323(2026) 110119, [arXiv:2505.04744]

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Costa, J

    F. Costa, J. Hoefken Zink, M. Lucente, S. Pascoli, and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz,ELENA: a software for fast and precise computation of first order phase transitions and gravitational waves production in particle physics models,arXiv:2510.00289

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    V. Keus, L. Lewitt and J. Thomson-Cooke, “BLOOP.” https://github.com/BLOOP-JTC/BLOOP

    work page

  13. [13]

    TransitionListener v2.0 -- Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions

    J. Matuszak and C. Tasillo,TransitionListener v2.0 – Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions,arXiv:2605.15259

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    I. R. Wang,LeWRON: Agentic Analysis of Electroweak Phase Transitions,arXiv:2606.19425

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The Electroweak Phase Transition: A Non-Perturbative Analysis

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov,The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis,Nucl. Phys. B466(1996) 189–258, [hep-lat/9510020]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  16. [16]

    J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Supersymmetric electroweak phase transition: Beyond perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B482(1996) 73–91, [hep-ph/9605235]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  17. [17]

    What's new with the electroweak phase transition?

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen,What’s new with the electroweak phase transition?,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73(1999) 180–185, [hep-lat/9809045]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model

    K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and V. Vaskonen,On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model, JHEP06(2019) 075, [arXiv:1904.01329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition

    O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Nonperturbative analysis of the gravitational waves from a first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 11 115024, [arXiv:1903.11604]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    First-order electroweak phase transitions: a nonperturbative update

    O. Gould, S. G¨ uyer, and K. Rummukainen,First-order electroweak phase transitions: A nonperturbative update,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 11 114507, [arXiv:2205.07238]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 119903 (2024)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended Standard Model

    L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 115016, [arXiv:2405.01191]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturbative analysis

    O. Gould,Real scalar phase transitions: a nonperturbative analysis,JHEP04(2021) 057, [arXiv:2101.05528]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Radiative first-order phase transitions to next-to-next-to-leading order

    A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, and J. L¨ ofgren,Radiative first-order phase transitions to next-to-next-to-leading order,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 3 036012, [ arXiv:2205.07241]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 019901 (2024)]. – 16 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Perturbative effective field theory expansions for cosmological phase transitions

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Perturbative effective field theory expansions for cosmological phase transitions,JHEP01(2024) 048, [arXiv:2309.01672]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: the final verdict on perturbation theory

    A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 9 096006, [arXiv:2405.18349]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929–2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    work page 1977

  27. [27]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections, Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762–1768

    work page 1977

  28. [28]

    A. D. Linde,On the Vacuum Instability and the Higgs Meson Mass,Phys. Lett. B70(1977) 306–308

    work page 1977

  29. [29]

    Affleck,Quantum Statistical Metastability,Phys

    I. Affleck,Quantum Statistical Metastability,Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 388

    work page 1981

  30. [30]

    A. D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216(1983) 421. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)]

    work page 1983

  31. [31]

    Numerical Approach to Multi Dimensional Phase Transitions

    T. Konstandin and S. J. Huber,Numerical approach to multi dimensional phase transitions,JCAP06 (2006) 021, [hep-ph/0603081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    Higher-Order Corrections to the Bubble-Nucleation Rate at Finite Temperature

    A. Ekstedt,Higher-order corrections to the bubble-nucleation rate at finite temperature,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 2 173, [arXiv:2104.11804]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Effective field theory approach to thermal bubble nucleation

    O. Gould and J. Hirvonen,Effective field theory approach to thermal bubble nucleation,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021), no. 9 096015, [arXiv:2108.04377]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Nucleation at finite temperature: a gauge-invariant, perturbative framework

    J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Framework,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 25 251801, [arXiv:2112.05472]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory

    J. Hirvonen, J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen,Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory,JHEP07(2022) 135, [arXiv:2112.08912]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Kierkla, P

    M. Kierkla, P. Schicho, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. van de Vis,Finite-temperature bubble nucleation with shifting scale hierarchies,JHEP07(2025) 153, [arXiv:2503.13597]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis,New J. Phys.14(2012) 125003, [arXiv:1206.2942]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Bubble Trouble: a Review on Electroweak Baryogenesis

    J. van de Vis, J. de Vries, and M. Postma,Bubble Trouble: a Review on Electroweak Baryogenesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.150(2026) 104244, [arXiv:2508.09989]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    A. M. Polyakov,Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe,Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 82–84

    work page 1975

  40. [40]

    A. M. Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys. Lett. B72(1978) 477–480

    work page 1978

  41. [41]

    Susskind,Lattice Models of Quark Confinement at High Temperature,Phys

    L. Susskind,Lattice Models of Quark Confinement at High Temperature,Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 2610–2618

    work page 1979

  42. [42]

    Weiss,The Effective Potential for the Order Parameter of Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature, Phys

    N. Weiss,The Effective Potential for the Order Parameter of Gauge Theories at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 475

    work page 1981

  43. [43]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe,QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,Rev. Mod. Phys.53(1981) 43. – 17 –

    work page 1981

  44. [44]

    R. D. Pisarski,Quark gluon plasma as a condensate of SU(3) Wilson lines,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 111501, [hep-ph/0006205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  45. [45]

    R. D. Pisarski,Notes on the deconfining phase transition,hep-ph/0203271

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    V. N. Popov and S. A. Fedotov,The functional-integration method and diagram technique for spin systems,Sov. Phys. JETP67(1988), no. 3 535–541

    work page 1988

  47. [47]

    Veits, R

    O. Veits, R. Oppermann, M. Binderberger, and J. Stein,Extension of the Popov-Fedotov method to arbitrary spin,Journal de Physique I4(1994), no. 4 493–497

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    One Loop Thermal Effective Action

    J. Chakrabortty and S. Mohanty,One Loop Thermal Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B1020(2025) 117165, [arXiv:2411.14146]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Higher-dimensional operators and Polyakov loop in hot Scalar QED from the heat kernel

    S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Chakrabortty, D. Dey, P. Schicho, and Tushar,Higher-dimensional operators and Polyakov loop in hot Scalar QED from the heat kernel,arXiv:2606.09779

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Svetitsky and L

    B. Svetitsky and L. G. Yaffe,Critical Behavior at Finite Temperature Confinement Transitions,Nucl. Phys. B210(1982) 423–447

    work page 1982

  51. [51]

    Chakrabortty, S

    J. Chakrabortty, S. Ghosh, and A. Kundu,in preparation, 2026

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Matsubara,A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics,Prog

    T. Matsubara,A New approach to quantum statistical mechanics,Prog. Theor. Phys.14(1955) 351–378

    work page 1955

  53. [53]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff,Finite Temperature Quantum Field Theory in Minkowski Space, Annals Phys.152(1984) 105

    work page 1984

  54. [54]

    N. P. Landsman and C. G. van Weert,Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density,Phys. Rept.145(1987) 141

    work page 1987

  55. [55]

    Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo,Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12(1957) 570–586

    work page 1957

  56. [56]

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger,Theory of many particle systems. 1.,Phys. Rev.115(1959) 1342–1373

    work page 1959

  57. [57]

    The thermal heat kernel expansion and the one-loop effective action of QCD at finite temperature

    E. Megias, E. Ruiz Arriola, and L. L. Salcedo,The Thermal heat kernel expansion and the one loop effective action of QCD at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 116003, [hep-ph/0312133]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [58]

    F. J. Moral-Gamez and L. L. Salcedo,Derivative expansion of the heat kernel at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 045019, [arXiv:1110.6300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    Gauge Choices, Infrared Pitfalls, and Thermal Effects in Effective Potentials

    D. Balui, T. Biswas, J. Chakrabortty, D. Dey, C. Englert, and S. Mohanty,Gauge choices, infrared pitfalls, and thermal effects in effective potentials,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 5 056022, [arXiv:2507.22706]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    P. B. Arnold and L. G. Yaffe,The NonAbelian Debye screening length beyond leading order,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 7208–7219, [hep-ph/9508280]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  61. [61]

    The non-perturbative QCD Debye mass from a Wilson line operator

    M. Laine and O. Philipsen,The Nonperturbative QCD Debye mass from a Wilson line operator,Phys. Lett. B459(1999) 259–264, [hep-lat/9905004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  62. [62]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888–1910

    work page 1973

  63. [63]

    Quiros,Field theory at finite temperature and phase transitions,Helv

    M. Quiros,Field theory at finite temperature and phase transitions,Helv. Phys. Acta67(1994) 451–583. – 18 –

    work page 1994

  64. [64]

    Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999.hep-ph/9901312

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  65. [65]

    L. L. Salcedo,Parity breaking in (2+1)-dimensions and finite temperature,Nucl. Phys. B549(1999) 98–144, [hep-th/9802071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  66. [66]

    Small shear viscosity in the semi quark gluon plasma

    Y. Hidaka and R. D. Pisarski,Small shear viscosity in the semi quark gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 076002, [arXiv:0912.0940]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    Braathen, S

    J. Braathen, S. Heinemeyer, C. P. Boatella, and A. Verduras Schaeidt,Complementarity of gravitational wave analyses and di-Higgs production in the exploration of the Electroweak Phase Transition dynamics in the RxSM,arXiv:2510.12569

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Biek¨ otter, A

    T. Biek¨ otter, A. Dashko, M. L¨ oschner, and G. Weiglein,Perturbative aspects of the electroweak phase transition with a complex singlet and implications for gravitational wave predictions, arXiv:2511.14831

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Gauge Invariant Effective Potential

    D. Balui, J. Chakrabortty, D. Dey, and S. Mohanty,Gauge invariant effective potential,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025), no. 8 085032, [arXiv:2502.17156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Background Fields Meet the Heat Kernel: Gauge Invariance and RGEs without diagrams

    D. Balui, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, S. Mohanty, and Tushar,Background Fields Meet the Heat Kernel: Gauge Invariance and RGEs without diagrams,arXiv:2604.05972

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    complex bessel

    J. Dumont and D. Gagnon et al., “complex bessel.” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18220

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18220

  72. [72]

    SLATEC mathematical library

    D. E. Amos et al., “SLATEC mathematical library.” https://netlib.org/slatec/src/

    work page

  73. [73]

    TASI lectures on Phase Transitions, Baryogenesis, and Gravitational Waves

    D. Croon,TASI lectures on Phase Transitions, Baryogenesis, and Gravitational Waves,PoS TASI2022(2024) 003, [arXiv:2307.00068]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Cosmological phase transitions: from perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135(2024) 104094, [arXiv:2305.02357]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory,JHEP07(2011) 029, [arXiv:1101.4665]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    A Critical Look at the Electroweak Phase Transition

    A. Ekstedt and J. L¨ ofgren,A Critical Look at the Electroweak Phase Transition,JHEP12(2020) 136, [arXiv:2006.12614]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    On the gauge dependence of the Standard Model vacuum instability scale

    L. Di Luzio and L. Mihaila,On the gauge dependence of the Standard Model vacuum instability scale, JHEP06(2014) 079, [arXiv:1404.7450]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, E. Morgante, A. Riotto, L. Senatore, A. Strumia, and N. Tetradis,The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability,JHEP09(2015) 174, [arXiv:1505.04825]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    C. L. Hammer, J. E. Shrauner, and B. DeFacio,Alternate Derivation of Vacuum Tunneling,Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 667

    work page 1979

  80. [80]

    False vacuum decay: an introductory review

    F. Devoto, S. Devoto, L. Di Luzio, and G. Ridolfi,False vacuum decay: an introductory review,J. Phys. G49(2022), no. 10 103001, [arXiv:2205.03140]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.