Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 238 references

Recovering Latent Structures after Variational Bayesian Variable Selection: Fit Assessment and Factor-Number Selection in Partially Exploratory Factor Analysis

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Pith's one-line read Gain rule on variational bound recovers true factor count

desk verdict Solid, practical methodology paper. The hard/soft selection framework and gain rule are genuinely useful. Main concern is the variational gap assumption, but it's bounded. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07159 v1 pith:HKWL6CEU submitted 2026-07-08 stat.ME cs.CL

classification stat.MEcs.CL
keywords Bayesianvariableselectionspike-and-slabpriorsvariationalinferencefactoranalysismodelfitassessmenteffectivedegreesoffreedom
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When researchers use Bayesian variable selection to discover the loading structure of a factor model, the converged solution carries inclusion probabilities for every candidate loading but no standard way to assess fit or decide how many latent factors exist. This paper converts the variational posterior into a conventional covariance model in two ways: hard selection thresholds inclusion probabilities into a fixed sparse pattern, while soft selection retains them as fractional weights yielding an effective parameter count in the spirit of Bayesian model comparison. From these two representations the authors derive degrees of freedom, absolute fit indices (RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), and relative criteria (AIC, BIC, ELBO) that respect the selection step. The central practical contribution is a scale-free gain rule for choosing the number of factors: retain factors only up to the point where the marginal improvement in a criterion drops below a fixed fraction (default 10%) of the largest improvement observed, with a sustained-drop guard requiring the decline to persist for two consecutive steps. Simulations show that absolute indices track loading recovery and flag under-factoring but are blind to over-factoring, that raw relative criteria systematically over-factor because they cannot distinguish genuine from nuisance dimensions, and that the gain rule applied to the variational evidence lower bound (ELBO) recovers the true dimensionality in 95% of high-dimensional replications versus 57% for the raw ELBO optimum. An empirical analysis of the 100-item PID-5 personality inventory shows that two completely disjoint backbone specifications recover the same 22-factor major structure, fitting better than the confirmatory 25-facet model despite a plug-in evaluation that penalizes the exploratory solution.

What carries the argument

The gain rule computes marginal gains g(K) = c(K) - c(K-1) for a criterion c oriented so larger is better, finds the maximum gain g_max, and selects the last K whose gain exceeds delta% of g_max, with a sustained-drop guard requiring s-1 subsequent gains to also fall below the threshold. Hard selection thresholds inclusion probabilities at tau (default 0.50) into a binary loading pattern with nominal or rank-adjusted parameter counts; soft selection retains probabilities as effective weights yielding posterior-expected parameter counts analogous to p_D in DIC or p_WAIC.

What would settle it

A simulation or empirical setting where the variational gap varies systematically with K, causing the ELBO gain path to separate at the wrong dimensionality. More directly: if the gain rule were applied to exact log-marginal-likelihood gains (removing the variational approximation) and selected a different K than the ELBO gain rule in a substantial fraction of cases, the variational gap assumption would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The scale-free gain rule with sustained-drop guard converts the over-factoring tendency of raw relative criteria into accurate dimensionality recovery by thresholding marginal criterion gains against the largest gain in the window rather than locating a global optimum. Applied to the ELBO, this rule recovers the true number of factors across a wide range of nuisance structure, sample sizes, and specification levels where raw ELBO, AIC, and BIC optima all drift upward. The mechanism is that genuine factors produce large marginal improvements while nuisance factors produce negligible ones, so a ratio threshold on gains cleanly separates the two without requiring any calibrated absolute cutoff.

Load-bearing premise

The ELBO gain rule depends on the variational gap the difference between the ELBO and the true log evidence being roughly comparable across candidate models with different numbers of factors. If this gap shrinks or grows systematically with K, the marginal ELBO gains no longer reflect genuine evidence gains, and the rule's accuracy in the simulations could be partly coincidental rather than a property of the criterion itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The gain rule principle is criterion-agnostic and could be applied to any model-selection path where adding parameters yields diminishing returns, including mixture model component selection, network edge selection, or tree depth in gradient boosting.
  • The hard-soft parameter-count gap (the difference between thresholded and effective parameter counts) serves as a built-in diagnostic for selection uncertainty that could be reported alongside any fit index to warn analysts when thresholding discards substantial posterior information.
  • The finding that stronger specification can reduce selection accuracy because it frees added factors to capture genuine nuisance covariance suggests that partial specification has a non-monotonic relationship with recovery quality, which has implications for how much prior structure to impose in exploratory settings.
  • The identification boundary that unspecified collinear clusters are resolved arbitrarily while well-separated major factors are recovered robustly provides a formal target for future work on partial identification in exploratory latent variable models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the variational gap (KL divergence between the variational approximation and the true posterior) varies systematically with the number of factors, ELBO differences across K values would not reflect genuine evidence differences, and the gain rule's accuracy could be a consequence of the gap's behavior rather than the criterion's fidelity to model evidence. The paper acknowledges this is untestab
  • The gain rule's sustained-drop guard with s=2 costs one extra factor of over-factoring headroom. In settings where factor estimation is expensive (e.g., large-scale genomic or neuroimaging data), the optimal s may trade off computational cost against robustness differently than in the simulations studied.
  • The finding that CFI and TLI cleanly separate under-factoring from adequate factoring while RMSEA and SRMR are uninformative at high dimensions (J=80) suggests that conventional cutoff recommendations for RMSEA and SRMR may need recalibration as the number of variables grows, independent of the variable-selection machinery proposed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper develops post-selection fit assessment tools for the regularized variational approximation for partially confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA-VA), extending its use to partially exploratory factor analysis (PEFA) where both the loading structure and the number of factors are weakly specified. The core contributions are: (1) converting converged variational solutions into covariance models via hard selection (thresholding inclusion probabilities) or soft selection (retaining them as effective parameter weights); (2) deriving corresponding degrees of freedom, absolute fit indices (RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), and relative criteria (AIC, BIC, ELBO); and (3) proposing a scale-free gain rule with a sustained-drop guard for selecting the number of factors. Two simulation studies calibrate the tools, and an empirical analysis of the 100-item PID-5 demonstrates the workflow. The gain rule, applied to the ELBO path, is shown to recover true dimensionality far more robustly than raw criteria, which systematically over-factor.

Significance. The paper addresses a genuine methodological gap: Bayesian variable selection in factor analysis produces inclusion probabilities, but the field lacks principled post-selection fit statistics that respect the selection step. The hard/soft selection distinction and the connection to effective degrees of freedom (p_D, p_WAIC, generalized d.f.) is well-motivated and correctly positioned in the literature. The scale-free gain rule with a formal correctness condition (Proposition 1) is a clean, falsifiable contribution. The reproducible code and simulation archives, the exact bracketing condition, and the disjoint-backbone robustness test in the empirical example are all commendable. The finding that the ELBO gain is most robust under heavy nuisance, while raw criteria collapse, is practically important for researchers working with large personality inventories.

major comments (2)
  1. The ELBO comparability assumption (Eqs. 31-32 and surrounding text) is the most load-bearing assumption in the paper. ELBO differences equal log-evidence differences minus differences in the KL divergence term across candidate K values. The paper states this is 'untestable directly' and relies on simulations. Two specific concerns: (1) The simulations use data generated from linear Gaussian factor models fit with normal-theory variational inference—a well-specified regime where the variational approximation is likely good and the KL gap relatively stable. The PID-5 empirical application uses 4-category items treated as continuous, introducing misspecification that could shift the KL gap behavior across K. (2) In Study 2 under heaviest nuisance (3w+3m), ELBO gain accuracy drops from 99.3% to 88.3% (Appendix A, Table A1 note). The paper does not disentangle whether this degradation stems (
  2. The plug-in nature of the fit statistics (Section on Absolute and Relative Fit Indices) creates a two-sided bias that is acknowledged but not fully bounded. The paper notes that the plug-in direction is conservative (shrunken variational estimates bound the minimized discrepancy from above) while the selection direction is optimistic (hard-selected d.f. are conditional on a data-chosen pattern). The hard-soft parameter-count gap is offered as a diagnostic, not a correction. However, the paper does not provide any simulation evidence on the magnitude of the post-selection optimism in T_H (Eq. 24) or its downstream effect on RMSEA_H, CFI_H, TLI_H. Since these indices are proposed as the primary reporting tools, even a brief simulation reporting the mean and SD of the gap between the plug-in T_H and the ML-refit T_H on the same selected pattern would substantially strengthen the claim that
minor comments (7)
  1. The notation switches between PCFA-VA and PCFA V A (with a space) throughout the manuscript. Consistent use of PCFA-VA would improve readability.
  2. In the paragraph following Eq. (6), the notation qvar(·) is introduced as the variational density, but the subscript notation in bπ_jk and bλ_jk uses a hat that is not defined. Clarifying that the hat denotes posterior quantities would help.
  3. Table 1: the K_fit=6 row shows RMSE=0.073, which is higher than K_fit=5 (0.052) but lower than K_fit=4 (0.109). The text attributes this to over-factoring absorbing nuisance, but the non-monotonicity (K_fit=7 has RMSE=0.077, K_fit=8 has 0.085, then K_fit=9 has 0.082) could use a brief explanation.
  4. Figure 5A: the y-axis label 'ELBO marginal gains g(K)' could be more informative if the units (nats) were indicated, as the text references '≈700 nats' but the figure axis is unlabeled in this respect.
  5. The default δ=10 is described as sitting at the 'under-selection-averse end of the stable region,' but Table A2 shows that for backbone a, δ=25 moves the selection from 22 to 20. A brief discussion of why δ=10 rather than, say, δ=15 (which also selects 22 for both backbones) is the default would be helpful.
  6. The paper cites Jin & Chen (2025) for the PCFA-VA method, which shares authors with the present paper. This is standard and appropriate, but a brief note in the introduction explicitly stating that the present paper extends the authors' prior work would be transparent.
  7. Appendix Table B1: the ELBO values are negative (e.g., -313,321), which is expected for a log-likelihood bound, but a note clarifying that these are negative and that larger (less negative) is better would prevent momentary confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gain rule and fit indices are validated against known truth in simulations, not against the authors' own prior results.

full rationale

The paper's central contributions—the post-selection fit indices (RMSEA, CFI, TLI, AIC, BIC, ELBO), the hard/soft selection framework, and the scale-free gain rule with sustained-drop guard—are logically independent of the estimation method's correctness. The gain rule (Eq. 37) is a general elbow-detection heuristic applied to any criterion path; its performance is validated against known true dimensionality in two simulation studies (99.4% and 94.8% accuracy), not against the authors' own prior results. The fit indices are derived from standard SEM formulas (Eqs. 23-36) applied to the converged variational solution, with parameter counts defined independently (Eqs. 12-22). The self-citation to Jin & Chen (2025) for the PCFA-VA estimation machinery is not load-bearing for the present paper's claims: the post-selection assessment framework would work with any variable-selection method that produces inclusion probabilities. The ELBO (Eq. 31-32) is the algorithm-native objective whose properties follow from variational inference theory generally, not from the authors' prior work. Proposition 1 (Appendix A) provides an independent correctness condition for the gain rule based on gain separation, with a self-contained proof. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities, particles, or forces. All constructs (spike-and-slab priors, ELBO, fit indices, gain rule) are established concepts recombined for the PEFA context. The free parameters are methodological choices (thresholds, hyperparameters) rather than physical constants fitted to data.

free parameters (5)
  • tau (threshold) = 0.50
    Hard-selection threshold for inclusion probabilities; default value chosen to parallel prior work, not fitted to data.
  • delta (gain threshold) = 10
    Percentage of largest gain used as cutoff in the gain rule; default value chosen empirically from simulation sensitivity analysis.
  • s (sustained-drop guard) = 2
    Number of consecutive sub-threshold gains required to confirm elbow; chosen to balance over-factoring headroom against noise protection.
  • v0, v1 (spike/slab variances) = not specified in text
    SSVS prior hyperparameters inherited from PCFA-VA; control the spike-and-slab separation but values not reported in this paper.
  • rho (Bernoulli inclusion prob) = 0.5
    Prior inclusion probability for SSVS; fixed at 0.5 when no prior loading activeness information is available.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Variational gap comparability across candidate K
    ELBO differences treated as evidence differences assume KL{q_var||p} is comparable across models with different K (Eq. 31-32). Stated as untestable directly.
  • domain assumption Local identification of selected loading pattern
    Nominal degrees of freedom formula (Eq. 14) assumes the selected pattern is locally identified; rank check (Eq. 16-17) provides fallback but is noted as potentially slow for large J.
  • domain assumption Pseudo chi-square interpretation of T_H
    The statistic T_H (Eq. 24) is evaluated at regularized variational estimates after selection; treated as descriptive rather than exact ML likelihood-ratio. Conventional cutoffs treated as heuristics.
  • domain assumption Gain separation at true K
    Proposition 1 requires that genuine factors produce gains exceeding the threshold while nuisance factors do not. This is an empirical condition verified in simulations but not guaranteed a priori.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recovering Latent Structures after Variational Bayesian Variable Selection: Fit Assessment and Factor-Number Selection in Partially Exploratory Factor Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKWL6CEU

@misc{pith2026260707159,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recovering Latent Structures after Variational Bayesian Variable Selection: Fit Assessment and Factor-Number Selection in Partially Exploratory Factor Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKWL6CEU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07159}
}
read the original abstract

In partially exploratory factor analysis (PEFA), the loading structure and factor numbers are weakly specified. The regularized variational approximation for partially confirmatory factor analysis (PCFA VA) recovers this structure via Bayesian variable selection, using spike and slab priors to assign inclusion probabilities to unspecified loadings. This research introduces a post selection assessment framework for this approach. We convert converged solutions into covariance models using either hard selection (thresholding probabilities into a sparse pattern) or soft selection (retaining them as weights for effective parameter counts). We derive the resulting degrees of freedom, absolute fit diagnostics (RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), and relative criteria (AIC, BIC, ELBO). To determine factor numbers, we propose a scale free gain rule with a sustained drop guard. Simulations show absolute indices successfully track loading recovery and flag under factoring. While raw criteria over factor, our gain rule accurately recovers true dimensionality, with the ELBO variant proving most robust. Finally, a 100 item PID 5 example demonstrates that our model fits better than a confirmatory 25 facet model and concordantly recovers major structures across disjoint specifications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

238 extracted references · 238 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Derringer, Jaime and Markon, Kristian E

    Krueger, Robert F. and Derringer, Jaime and Markon, Kristian E. and Watson, David and Skodol, Andrew E. , journal=. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for. 2012 , publisher=

  2. [2]

    PsyArXiv preprint , year=

    The SAPA Personality Inventory: An empirically-derived, hierarchically-organized self-report personality assessment model , author=. PsyArXiv preprint , year=. doi:10.31234/osf.io/sc4p9 , publisher=

  3. [3]

    2024 , note=

    psychTools: Tools to Accompany the 'psych' Package for Psychological Research , author=. 2024 , note=

  4. [4]

    A generalized partially confirmatory factor analysis framework with mixed

    Chen, Jinsong , journal=. A generalized partially confirmatory factor analysis framework with mixed. 2022 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    A partially confirmatory approach to scale development with the

    Chen, Jinsong and Guo, Zhihan and Zhang, Lijin and Pan, Junhao , journal=. A partially confirmatory approach to scale development with the. 2021 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    Journal of machine Learning research , volume=

    Latent dirichlet allocation , author=. Journal of machine Learning research , volume=

  7. [7]

    BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure

    BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794 , year=

  8. [8]

    BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , year=

Show all 238 references
  1. [9]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Language models are few-shot learners , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  2. [10]

    Multimedia tools and applications , volume=

    Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: models, applications, a survey , author=. Multimedia tools and applications , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  3. [11]

    Information Systems , volume=

    A review of topic modeling methods , author=. Information Systems , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  4. [12]

    ACM computing surveys (csur) , volume=

    Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning , author=. ACM computing surveys (csur) , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  5. [13]

    , author=

    How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. , author=. Psychological Methods , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  6. [14]

    An empirical

    Braeken, Johan and Van Assen, Marcel ALM , journal=. An empirical. 2017 , publisher=

  7. [15]

    , author=

    Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , author=. Psychological Methods , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  8. [16]

    2023 , publisher=

    Principles and practice of structural equation modeling , author=. 2023 , publisher=

  9. [17]

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , volume=

    A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works , author=. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  10. [18]

    Springer google schola , volume=

    Pattern recognition and machine learning , author=. Springer google schola , volume=

  11. [19]

    Fundamentals of artificial intelligence , pages=

    Natural language processing , author=. Fundamentals of artificial intelligence , pages=. 2020 , publisher=

  12. [20]

    2009 , publisher=

    Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit , author=. 2009 , publisher=

  13. [21]

    Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall , year=

    Speech and Language Processing: An introduction to speech recognition, computational linguistics and natural language processing , author=. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall , year=

  14. [22]

    2021 , publisher=

    Transformers for Natural Language Processing: Build innovative deep neural network architectures for NLP with Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow, BERT, RoBERTa, and more , author=. 2021 , publisher=

  15. [23]

    2019 , publisher=

    Text analytics with Python: a practitioner's guide to natural language processing , author=. 2019 , publisher=

  16. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , year=

    Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , year=

  18. [26]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  19. [27]

    2014 , publisher=

    Factor analysis: Classic edition , author=. 2014 , publisher=

  20. [28]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  21. [29]

    Proceedings of the 27th international conference on computational linguistics , pages=

    Contextual string embeddings for sequence labeling , author=. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on computational linguistics , pages=

  22. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 , year=

    Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 , year=

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09588 , year=

    Utilizing BERT for aspect-based sentiment analysis via constructing auxiliary sentence , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09588 , year=

  24. [32]

    Rethinking complex neural network architectures for document classification , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , pages=

  25. [33]

    Advances in Information Retrieval: 42nd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2020, Lisbon, Portugal, April 14--17, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 42 , pages=

    Keyphrase extraction as sequence labeling using contextualized embeddings , author=. Advances in Information Retrieval: 42nd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2020, Lisbon, Portugal, April 14--17, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 42 , pages=. 2020 , organization=

  26. [34]

    2008 , publisher=

    Introduction to information retrieval , author=. 2008 , publisher=

  27. [35]

    2007 , publisher=

    The text mining handbook: advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data , author=. 2007 , publisher=

  28. [36]

    arXiv preprint cs/0205028 , year=

    Nltk: The natural language toolkit , author=. arXiv preprint cs/0205028 , year=

  29. [37]

    Robustness in statistics , pages=

    Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building , author=. Robustness in statistics , pages=. 1979 , publisher=

  30. [38]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    Exploratory bi-factor analysis , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  31. [39]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    The development of hierarchical factor solutions , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1957 , publisher=

  32. [40]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  33. [41]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Long Range Arena : A Benchmark for Efficient Transformers , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

  34. [42]

    Approaches for

    George, Edward I and McCulloch, Robert E , journal=. Approaches for. 1997 , publisher=

  35. [43]

    Guoqiang, Lin , journal=. A

  36. [44]

    The annals of mathematical statistics , volume=

    On information and sufficiency , author=. The annals of mathematical statistics , volume=. 1951 , publisher=

  37. [45]

    Variational inference:

    Blei, David M and Kucukelbir, Alp and McAuliffe, Jon D , journal=. Variational inference:. 2017 , publisher=

  38. [46]

    Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Automatic text scoring using neural networks , author=. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

  39. [47]

    International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , volume=

    An empirical analysis of BERT embedding for automated essay scoring , author=. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , volume=

  40. [48]

    PNAS Nexus , year=

    Meaning modulations and stability in large language models: An analysis of BERT embeddings for psycholinguistic research , author=. PNAS Nexus , year=

  41. [49]

    Science , volume=

    Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases , author=. Science , volume=

  42. [50]

    South , author=

    Leveraging the alignment between machine learning and intersectionality: Using word embeddings to measure intersectional experiences of the nineteenth century U.S. South , author=. Poetics , volume=

  43. [51]

    and Shaukat, A

    Arshad, F. and Shaukat, A. and Latif, S. , title =. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology , year =

  44. [52]

    and Suhartono, D

    Christian, H. and Suhartono, D. and Chowanda, A. and Zamli, K. Z. , title =. Journal of Big Data , volume =

  45. [53]

    and Du, J

    Luo, Y. and Du, J. S. and Qiu, L. , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Behavioral and Social Computing (BESC) , year =

  46. [54]

    and Yang, L

    Zhou, X. and Yang, L. and Fan, X. and Ren, G. and Yang, Y. and Lin, H. , title =. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , year =

  47. [55]

    and Long, Y

    Huang, Z. and Long, Y. and Peng, K. and Tong, S. , title =. Journal of Intelligence , volume =

  48. [56]

    Wulff, D. U. and Mata, R. , title =. Nature Human Behaviour , year =

  49. [57]

    Political Analysis , volume =

    Rheault, Luke and Cochrane, Christopher , title =. Political Analysis , volume =

  50. [58]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Garg, Nikhil and Schiebinger, Londa and Jurafsky, Dan and Zou, James , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

  51. [59]

    Applied and Computational Engineering , volume =

    Shu, Xiaoxue , title =. Applied and Computational Engineering , volume =

  52. [60]

    Mathematics , volume =

    Faseeh, Muneeb and Jaleel, Abdul and Iqbal, Nadeem and Ghani, Abdullah and Abdusalomov, Abduvohid and Mehmood, Asad and Cho, Young , title =. Mathematics , volume =

  53. [61]

    Rytting, C. M. and Sorensen, T. and Argyle, L. and Busby, E. and Fulda, N. and Gubler, J. and Wingate, D. , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  54. [62]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Li, Lin and Li, Jincheng and Chen, Cheng and Gui, Feng and Yang, Hongyi and Yu, Chenyu and Wang, Zefan and others , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  55. [63]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Fitz, Samuel , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  56. [64]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Petukhova, Anna and Matos-Carvalho, Joao Pedro and Fachada, Nuno , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  57. [65]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Nie, Zihan and Feng, Zhen and Li, Ming and Zhang, Cheng and Zhang, Yichen and Long, Donghong and Zhang, Rui , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  58. [66]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Tao, Chao and Shen, Tao and Gao, Shangsong and Zhang, Jun and Li, Zhiyuan and Tao, Zhanxing and Ma, Shuming , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  59. [67]

    Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , volume=

    Regularized Variational Approximation for Partially Confirmatory Factor Analysis , author=. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  60. [68]

    2024 , publisher=

    Exploring Psychometric Analysis of Textual Data with Large Language Models: Chances and Challenges , author=. 2024 , publisher=

  61. [69]

    Dynamic Documents with

    Yihui Xie , publisher =. Dynamic Documents with. 2015 , edition =

  62. [70]

    1977 , author =

    Exploratory Data Analysis , publisher =. 1977 , author =

  63. [71]

    1987 , author =

    Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces , publisher =. 1987 , author =

  64. [72]

    1907 , journal=

    Vox populi , author=. 1907 , journal=

  65. [73]

    Investigating variation in replicability:

    Klein, Richard A and Ratliff, Kate A and Vianello, Michelangelo and Adams Jr, Reginald B and Bahn. Investigating variation in replicability:. Social psychology , year=

  66. [74]

    2011 , publisher=

    Data analysis: A model comparison approach , author=. 2011 , publisher=

  67. [75]

    2014 , publisher=

    Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan , author=. 2014 , publisher=

  68. [76]

    Wellcome Open Research , VOLUME =

    Allen, M and Poggiali, D and Whitaker, K and Marshall, T R and Kievit, R A , TITLE =. Wellcome Open Research , VOLUME =. 2019 , NUMBER =

  69. [77]

    Biometrika , pages=

    The probable error of a mean , author=. Biometrika , pages=. 1908 , publisher=

  70. [78]

    the probable error of a mean

    On student's 1908 article "the probable error of a mean"" , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  71. [79]

    The American Statistician , author =

    Sample Quantiles in Statistical Packages , volume =. The American Statistician , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.1080/00031305.1996.10473566 , language =

  72. [80]

    Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=

    The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals , author=. Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  73. [81]

    Psychological science , volume=

    The new statistics: Why and how , author=. Psychological science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  74. [82]

    Annual review of public health , volume=

    The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets , author=. Annual review of public health , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  75. [83]

    2018 , volume =

    Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism , author =. 2018 , volume =. doi:10.1002/polq.12737 , journal =

  76. [84]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  77. [85]

    and Weber, Elke U

    Zaval, Lisa and Markowitz, Ezra M. and Weber, Elke U. , year =. How Will. Psychological Science , language =. doi:10.1177/0956797614561266 , abstract =

  78. [86]

    Organizational behavior and human decision processes , volume=

    The theory of planned behavior , author=. Organizational behavior and human decision processes , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

  79. [87]

    , author=

    The moderator--mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , author=. Journal of personality and social psychology , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

  80. [88]

    Annual Review of Psychology , volume=

    Mediation analysis , author=. Annual Review of Psychology , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  81. [89]

    Behavior research methods , volume=

    Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , author=. Behavior research methods , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  82. [90]

    Technometrics , volume=

    Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , author=. Technometrics , volume=. 1970 , publisher=

  83. [91]

    and Bonsall, Michael B

    James, Ella L. and Bonsall, Michael B. and Hoppitt, Laura and Tunbridge, Elizabeth M. and Geddes, John R. and Milton, Amy L. and Holmes, Emily A. , year =. Computer Game Play Reduces Intrusive Memories of Experimental Trauma via Reconsolidation-Update Mechanisms , shorttitle =...

  84. [92]

    1959 , publisher=

    The logic of scientific discovery , author=. 1959 , publisher=

  85. [93]

    Psychological Science , volume=

    The role of experimenter belief in social priming , author=. Psychological Science , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  86. [94]

    2017 , publisher=

    Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective , author=. 2017 , publisher=

  87. [95]

    Psychological Bulletin , author =

    Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance , volume =. Psychological Bulletin , author =. 1986 , keywords =. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422 , number =

  88. [96]

    , volume =

    Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , volume =. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1037/a0028347 , number =

  89. [97]

    Psychometrika , author =

    Synthesis of variance , volume =. Psychometrika , author =. 1941 , pages =. doi:10.1007/BF02288586 , language =

  90. [98]

    Biometrics , author =

    Small Sample Inference for Fixed Effects from Restricted Maximum Likelihood , volume =. Biometrics , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.2307/2533558 , number =

  91. [99]

    The annals of mathematical statistics , volume=

    The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses , author=. The annals of mathematical statistics , volume=. 1938 , publisher=

  92. [100]

    2006 , publisher=

    Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS , author=. 2006 , publisher=

  93. [101]

    Journal of Memory and Language , author =

    Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal , volume =. Journal of Memory and Language , author =. 2013 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 , number =

  94. [102]

    New Methods in Cognitive Psychology , pages =

    An introduction to linear mixed modeling in experimental psychology , author =. New Methods in Cognitive Psychology , pages =. 2019 , date =

  95. [103]

    Parsimonious Mixed Models , journal =

    Bates, Douglas and Kliegl, Reinhold and Vasishth, Shravan and Baayen, Harald , year =. Parsimonious Mixed Models , journal =

  96. [104]

    Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models , volume =

    Matuschek, Hannes and Kliegl, Reinhold and Vasishth, Shravan and Baayen, Harald and Bates, Douglas , year =. Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001 , journal =

  97. [105]

    and Gravenstein, Stefan and Elliott, Michael and Colopy, Michael and Schweinle, Jo , title = "

    Monto, Arnold S. and Gravenstein, Stefan and Elliott, Michael and Colopy, Michael and Schweinle, Jo , title = ". Archives of Internal Medicine , volume =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.21.3243 , url =

  98. [106]

    An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances , volume =

    Bayes, Thomas , journal =. An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances , volume =

  99. [107]

    1939 , publisher=

    The theory of probability , author=. 1939 , publisher=

  100. [108]

    1988 , publisher=

    The Likelihood Principle , author=. 1988 , publisher=

  101. [109]

    Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=

    Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , author=. Psychonomic bulletin & review , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  102. [110]

    Mixtures of g priors for

    Liang, Feng and Paulo, Rui and Molina, German and Clyde, Merlise A and Berger, Jim O , journal=. Mixtures of g priors for. 2008 , publisher=

  103. [111]

    Rouder, Jeffrey N and Morey, Richard D and Speckman, Paul L and Province, Jordan M , journal=. Default. 2012 , publisher=

  104. [112]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  105. [113]

    2018 , note =

    BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , author =. 2018 , note =

  106. [114]

    The earth is round (p<. 05). , Author =. American psychologist , Year =

  107. [115]

    , Author =

    Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. , Author =. Psychological Methods , Year =

  108. [116]

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , Year =

    A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values , Author =. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , Year =

  109. [117]

    The Journal of Psychology , volume=

    The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers , author=. The Journal of Psychology , volume=. 1963 , publisher=

  110. [118]

    Psychological science , volume=

    False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant , author=. Psychological science , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  111. [119]

    Journal of Counseling & Development , volume=

    Two and one-half decades of leadership in measurement and evaluation , author=. Journal of Counseling & Development , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  112. [120]

    fishing expedition

    The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no "fishing expedition" or "p-hacking" and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time , author=. 2013 , url=

  113. [121]

    Posterior-hacking: Selective reporting invalidates

    Simonsohn, Uri , note=. Posterior-hacking: Selective reporting invalidates

  114. [122]

    Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance

    Lix, Lisa M and Keselman, Joanne C and Keselman, Harvey J , journal=. Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance. 1996 , publisher=

  115. [123]

    , author=

    Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. , author=. Psychological Bulletin , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

  116. [124]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) , volume=

    The Box-Cox transformation technique: a review , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  117. [125]

    Publication manual of the

  118. [126]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Limited evidence of hierarchical encoding in the cheerleader effect , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  119. [127]

    Psychological Science , volume=

    Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive , author=. Psychological Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  120. [128]

    1997 , publisher=

    Bootstrap methods and their application , author=. 1997 , publisher=

  121. [129]

    1988 , publisher=

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences , author=. 1988 , publisher=

  122. [130]

    Prevention science , volume=

    Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect , author=. Prevention science , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  123. [131]

    Contributions to probability and statistics

    Robust tests for equality of variances , author=. Contributions to probability and statistics. Essays in honor of. 1960 , publisher=

  124. [132]

    2012 , publisher=

    Statistical methods for psychology , author=. 2012 , publisher=

  125. [133]

    Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification , author=

    Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification , author=. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , pages=

  126. [134]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    On methods in the analysis of profile data , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1959 , publisher=

  127. [135]

    Estimation of the

    Huynh, Huynh and Feldt, Leonard S , journal=. Estimation of the. 1976 , publisher=

  128. [136]

    The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , volume=

    Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution , author=. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , volume=. 1940 , publisher=

  129. [137]

    Behavior research methods , volume=

    Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R , author=. Behavior research methods , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  130. [138]

    Frontiers in Psychology , volume=

    Visibility is not equivalent to confidence in a low contrast orientation discrimination task , author=. Frontiers in Psychology , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  131. [139]

    2019 , publisher=

    Generalized linear models , author=. 2019 , publisher=

  132. [140]

    2018 , publisher=

    An introduction to categorical data analysis , author=. 2018 , publisher=

  133. [141]

    Computational Brain & Behavior , volume=

    Transfer of Learned Opponent Models in Zero Sum Games , author=. Computational Brain & Behavior , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  134. [142]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , volume=

    A method for computing profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

  135. [143]

    2018 , publisher=

    An introduction to generalized linear models , author=. 2018 , publisher=

  136. [144]

    2013 , publisher=

    Applied logistic regression , author=. 2013 , publisher=

  137. [145]

    2014 , publisher=

    Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences , author=. 2014 , publisher=

  138. [146]

    Language and Linguistics Compass , volume=

    Poisson regression for linguists: A tutorial introduction to modelling count data with brms , author=. Language and Linguistics Compass , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  139. [147]

    Generalized linear models with examples in

    Dunn, Peter K and Smyth, Gordon K , year=. Generalized linear models with examples in

  140. [148]

    1966 , publisher=

    Signal detection theory and psychophysics , author=. 1966 , publisher=

  141. [149]

    1973 , publisher=

    Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , author=. 1973 , publisher=

  142. [150]

    2015 , publisher=

    Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models , author=. 2015 , publisher=

  143. [151]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 1920 , publisher=

  144. [152]

    Kaplan , abstract =

    D. Kaplan , abstract =. Structural Equation Modeling , editor =. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences , publisher =. 2001 , isbn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00776-2 , url =

  145. [153]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

  146. [154]

    Principles and practice of structural equation modeling , author=

  147. [155]

    Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , volume=

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , author=. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  148. [156]

    Schwarz , Journal =

    G. Schwarz , Journal =. Estimating the dimension of a model , Volume =

  149. [157]

    Akaike , Booktitle =

    H. Akaike , Booktitle =. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle , Year =

  150. [158]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    On structural equation model equivalence , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

  151. [159]

    2012 , booktitle =

    The causal foundations of structural equation modeling , author=. 2012 , booktitle =

  152. [160]

    Rohrer , title =

    Julia M. Rohrer , title =. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science , volume =. 2018 , doi =

  153. [161]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , year=

    Big five inventory , author=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , year=

  154. [162]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=

    The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power , author=. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

  155. [163]

    Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2): Hierarchick

    H. Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2): Hierarchick. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie , volume=

  156. [164]

    Psychological Bulletin , volume=

    Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance , author=. Psychological Bulletin , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  157. [165]

    The American Journal of Psychology , volume=

    General Intelligence,Objectively Determined and Measured , author=. The American Journal of Psychology , volume=

  158. [166]

    Testing negative error variances: Is a

    Kolenikov, Stanislav and Bollen, Kenneth A , journal=. Testing negative error variances: Is a. 2012 , publisher=

  159. [167]

    Handbook of structural equation modelling , editor =

    using Factor scores in structural Equation Modeling , author=. Handbook of structural equation modelling , editor =. 2023 , publisher=

  160. [168]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    Metaphor taken as math: Indeterminancy in the factor analysis model , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 1996 , publisher=

  161. [169]

    British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , volume=

    The origin of factor scores: Spearman, Thomson and Bartlett , author=. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  162. [170]

    Journal of Educational Measurement , volume =

    Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory , author =. Journal of Educational Measurement , volume =. 1983 , publisher =

  163. [171]

    2009 , publisher =

    Multidimensional Item Response Theory , author =. 2009 , publisher =

  164. [172]

    2010 , publisher =

    Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications , author =. 2010 , publisher =

  165. [173]

    An empirically based method of

    de la Torre, Jimmy , journal =. An empirically based method of. 2008 , publisher =

  166. [174]

    A general method of empirical

    de la Torre, Jimmy and Chiu, Chia-Yi , journal =. A general method of empirical. 2016 , publisher =

  167. [175]

    Handbook of Statistics , editor =

    Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models , author =. Handbook of Statistics , editor =. 2007 , publisher =

  168. [176]

    Journal of Educational Measurement , volume =

    Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling , author =. Journal of Educational Measurement , volume =. 2013 , publisher =

  169. [177]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =

    Identifying latent structures in restricted latent class models , author =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =. 2018 , publisher =

  170. [178]

    Psychometrika , volume =

    Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications , author =. Psychometrika , volume =. 2009 , publisher =

  171. [179]

    Data-driven learning of

    Liu, Jingchen and Xu, Gongjun and Ying, Zhiliang , journal =. Data-driven learning of. 2012 , publisher =

  172. [180]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 , year =

    Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 , year =

  173. [181]

    , booktitle =

    Pennington, Jeffrey and Socher, Richard and Manning, Christopher D. , booktitle =. 2014 , publisher =

  174. [182]

    2019 , publisher =

    Devlin, Jacob and Chang, Ming-Wei and Lee, Kenton and Toutanova, Kristina , booktitle =. 2019 , publisher =

  175. [183]

    Sentence-

    Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna , booktitle =. Sentence-. 2019 , publisher =

  176. [184]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07316 , year =

    Muennighoff, Niklas and Tazi, Nouamane and Magne, Lo. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07316 , year =

  177. [185]

    On the application of

    Benedetto, Luca and Aradelli, Giovanni and Cremonesi, Paolo and Cappelli, Andrea and Giussani, Andrea and Turrin, Roberto , booktitle =. On the application of. 2021 , publisher =

  178. [186]

    Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (

    Predicting item survival for multiple choice questions in a high-stakes medical exam , author =. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (. 2020 , publisher =

  179. [187]

    Pre-training

    Sung, Chul and Dhamecha, Tejas Indulal and Saha, Swarnadeep and Ma, Tengfei and Reddy, Vinay and Arora, Rishi , booktitle =. Pre-training. 2019 , publisher =

  180. [188]

    and Yancey, Kevin and Goodwin, Sarah and Park, Yena and von Davier, Alina A

    Attali, Yigal and Runge, Andrew and LaFlair, Geoffrey T. and Yancey, Kevin and Goodwin, Sarah and Park, Yena and von Davier, Alina A. , journal =. The interactive reading task:. 2022 , publisher =

  181. [189]

    McInnes, Leland and Healy, John and Melville, James , journal =

  182. [190]

    Visualizing data using t-

    van der Maaten, Laurens and Hinton, Geoffrey , journal =. Visualizing data using t-

  183. [191]

    Classifying math knowledge components via task-adaptive pre-trained

    Shen, Jia Tracy and Yamashita, Michiharu and Prihar, Ethan and Heffernan, Neil and Wu, Xintao and McGrew, Sean and Lee, Dongwon , booktitle =. Classifying math knowledge components via task-adaptive pre-trained. 2021 , publisher =

  184. [192]

    How contextual are contextualized word representations?

    Ethayarajh, Kawin , booktitle =. How contextual are contextualized word representations?. 2019 , publisher =

  185. [193]

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science , volume =

    Indexing by latent semantic analysis , author =. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , volume =. 1990 , publisher =

  186. [194]

    Machine Learning , volume =

    Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis , author =. Machine Learning , volume =. 2001 , publisher =

  187. [195]

    Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages =

    On the sentence embeddings from pre-trained language models , author =. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages =. 2020 , publisher =

  188. [196]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15316 , year =

    Whitening sentence representations for better semantics and faster retrieval , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15316 , year =

  189. [197]

    Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 , pages =

    Is cosine-similarity of embeddings really about similarity? , author =. Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 , pages =. 2024 , publisher =

  190. [198]

    Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science , volume =

    Language models accurately infer correlations between psychological items and scales from text alone , author =. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science , volume =. 2025 , publisher =

  191. [199]

    Intelligence-Based Medicine , volume =

    Semantic analysis of test items through large language model embeddings predicts a-priori factorial structure of personality tests , author =. Intelligence-Based Medicine , volume =. 2025 , publisher =

  192. [200]

    Documents are people and words are items:

    Chen, Jinsong , journal =. Documents are people and words are items:

  193. [201]

    and Bier, Norman and Domadia, Tanvi and Stamper, John , booktitle =

    Moore, Steven and Nguyen, Huy A. and Bier, Norman and Domadia, Tanvi and Stamper, John , booktitle =. Assessing the quality of student-generated short answer questions using. 2022 , publisher =

  194. [202]

    , booktitle =

    Feng, Wanyong and Tran, Peter and Sireci, Stephen and Lan, Andrew S. , booktitle =. Reasoning and sampling-augmented. 2025 , publisher =

  195. [203]

    Psychometrika , volume =

    Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis , author =. Psychometrika , volume =. 2004 , publisher =

  196. [204]

    Amini, Aida and Gabriel, Saadia and Lin, Peter and Koncel-Kedziorski, Rik and Choi, Yejin and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh , journal =

  197. [205]

    and Heffernan, Cristina Lindquist , journal =

    Heffernan, Neil T. and Heffernan, Cristina Lindquist , journal =. The. 2014 , publisher =

  198. [206]

    Mullis, Ina V. S. and Martin, Michael O. and Foy, Pierre and Arora, Alka , year =

  199. [207]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1969 , publisher=

  200. [208]

    1996 , publisher=

    LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide , author=. 1996 , publisher=

  201. [209]

    Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA , year=

    Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , author=. Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA , year=

  202. [210]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

  203. [211]

    Psychological Bulletin , volume=

    Comparative fit indexes in structural models , author=. Psychological Bulletin , volume=

  204. [212]

    1995 , publisher=

    EQS Structural Equations Program Manual , author=. 1995 , publisher=

  205. [213]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , author=. Psychometrika , volume=

  206. [214]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , volume=

    Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , volume=

  207. [215]

    Asymptotic equivalence of

    Watanabe, Sumio , journal=. Asymptotic equivalence of

  208. [216]

    The Annals of Statistics , volume=

    On the ``degrees of freedom'' of the lasso , author=. The Annals of Statistics , volume=

  209. [217]

    Psychological Methods , volume=

    Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling , author=. Psychological Methods , volume=

  210. [218]

    Understanding predictive information criteria for

    Gelman, Andrew and Hwang, Jessica and Vehtari, Aki , journal=. Understanding predictive information criteria for

  211. [219]

    Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling , editor=

    Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling , author=. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling , editor=. 2012 , publisher=

  212. [220]

    lavaan: An

    Rosseel, Yves , journal=. lavaan: An

  213. [221]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , author=. Psychometrika , volume=

  214. [222]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

  215. [223]

    Extended

    Chen, Jiahua and Chen, Zehua , journal=. Extended

  216. [224]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis , author=. Psychometrika , volume=

  217. [225]

    You, Chong and Ormerod, John T and Li, Xiangyang and Pang, Cheng Heng and Zhou, Xiao-Hua , journal=. An. 2023 , publisher=

  218. [226]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Ro. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  219. [227]

    Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=

    The scree test for the number of factors , author=. Multivariate Behavioral Research , volume=. 1966 , publisher=

  220. [228]

    Psychometrika , volume=

    Who belongs in the family? , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1953 , publisher=

  221. [229]

    2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops , pages=

    Finding a ``kneedle'' in a haystack: Detecting knee points in system behavior , author=. 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops , pages=. 2011 , organization=

  222. [230]

    16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) , pages=

    Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms , author=. 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) , pages=. 2004 , organization=

  223. [231]

    Non-graphical solutions for

    Ra. Non-graphical solutions for. Methodology , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  224. [232]

    The psychometric properties of the

    Roskam, Isabelle and Galdiolo, Sarah and Hansenne, Michel and Massoudi, Koorosh and Rossier, J. The psychometric properties of the. PLoS ONE , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  225. [233]

    Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , volume=

    Statistical inference in factor analysis , author=. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , volume=. 1956 , publisher=

  226. [234]

    Linear Algebra and its Applications , volume=

    Generic global identification in factor analysis , author=. Linear Algebra and its Applications , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  227. [235]

    The Annals of Statistics , volume=

    Valid post-selection inference , author=. The Annals of Statistics , volume=

  228. [236]

    Psychological Bulletin , volume=

    Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models , author=. Psychological Bulletin , volume=

  229. [237]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    The estimation of prediction error: Covariance penalties and cross-validation , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

  230. [238]

    When can categorical variables be treated as continuous?

    Rhemtulla, Mijke and Brosseau-Liard, Patricia. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous?. Psychological Methods , volume=

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.