Space and Lunar Interferometry: Emerging Concepts and Pathways

Gioia Rau

Science targets set wavelength and resolution, which lock baseline, architecture, and risk for space and lunar interferometers; shared technologies maturing as flagship byproducts will decide which concepts fly.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 19:49 UTC pith:VPYRXBD7

load-bearing objection Solid invited synthesis that maps science drivers to free-flying vs lunar architectures and gives a usable six-point decade roadmap; no new result, but the framing and tall-pole list are worth having.

arxiv 2607.07746 v1 pith:VPYRXBD7 submitted 2026-07-08 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

Space and Lunar Interferometry: Emerging Concepts and Pathways

Gioia Rau This is my paper

classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP

keywords astronomical interferometryspace interferometrylunar interferometrynulling interferometryformation flyingoptical interferometrylunar farside radio astronomyhigh angular resolution

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This invited review maps the concrete landscape of free-flying, structurally connected, lunar-surface, and hybrid space-VLBI interferometers. Its central claim is that the science target fixes the wavelength regime and angular resolution required, which in turn fix baseline length, platform architecture, and the dominant implementation risk. Mid-infrared free-flying nullers target temperate exoplanet thermal spectra; lunar far-side radio arrays open the low-frequency universe from the only radio-quiet site in the inner Solar System; lunar UV/optical arrays revive stellar-surface imaging and microarcsecond astrometry for dynamical masses needed by future direct-imaging target selection; far-infrared, space-VLBI, and X-ray concepts extend the reach to planet formation, high-redshift galaxies, and black-hole physics; and lunar laser interferometry measures mid-band gravitational-wave strain rather than angular position. Across these tracks the same enabling technologies—precision formation flying, absolute metrology, beam combination and nulling, cryogenics, and autonomous deployment—are maturing largely as byproducts of flagship programs, a dynamic that increasingly governs which concepts become missions. A reader should care because the paper turns a long-standing aspiration into a sequenced set of pathfinder and funding decisions for the coming decade.

Core claim

Off-Earth interferometry is best organized by what each concept measures, not by where it flies. The science target sets wavelength and angular resolution; those two fix baseline scale; baseline drives architecture—structurally connected, free-flying, or lunar-surface—and with it the dominant engineering risk. Across mid-IR nulling, lunar UV/optical and radio, far-IR, space VLBI, X-ray, and lunar gravitational-wave pathways, a shared technology base is rising as a byproduct of flagship programs, and that shared maturation, together with pathfinder sequencing and funding models that bridge laboratory work to flight, will decide which complementary concepts become operational observatories.

What carries the argument

The science-to-architecture map (Table 1 and Figures 1/A1): science target → wavelength and angular resolution → baseline → architecture (structurally connected, free-flying, or surface-deployed) → dominant implementation challenge. It carries the argument by showing that free-flying mid-IR nulling, lunar far-side radio, lunar UV/optical imaging and astrometry, and lunar gravitational-wave interferometry occupy complementary niches rather than competing for a single winner.

Load-bearing premise

The enabling technologies will keep maturing as free byproducts of other flagship programs, and small high-cadence pathfinders will actually be funded and flown before any multi-billion-dollar commitment is required.

What would settle it

If the next five to ten years pass without a successful end-to-end demonstration of stellar fringes from free-flying spacecraft or a single-baseline lunar optical interferometer, and without flight-proven absolute optical-path metrology near the ten-nanometer level for visible/UV work, the claim that byproduct maturation plus pathfinder sequencing will convert concept studies into missions would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

Flying at least one end-to-end starlight-fringe pathfinder becomes the single clearest gate for any free-flying flagship.
Absolute metrology near ten nanometers and cryogenic deep nulling near 10^{-5} must be treated as shared investments that retire risk across multiple missions.
Lunar far-side radio and lunar optical should advance on separate maturity tracks because their infrastructure pacing differs.
Philanthropic and private capital can fund the bounded, high-risk integration steps that currently sit in a programmatic valley between lab grants and flight lines.
A fixed-baseline lunar astrometric interferometer could supply the dynamical masses that direct-imaging target selection for a habitable-worlds flagship requires.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Without flown small precursors, cost models for formation-flying observatories remain without a reference class, so flagship proposals will keep stalling on schedule and cost credibility rather than pure technology readiness.
Protecting the lunar far-side radio-quiet zone is itself part of the observatory architecture; local Artemis-era communications can erase the unique science case if spectrum governance is deferred.
Coordinated target lists for thermal-emission nullers and reflected-light flagships would break radius–albedo–temperature degeneracies that neither architecture can resolve alone.
In-situ fabrication concepts for massive far-side dipole fields will only matter if far-side data relay and onboard correlation are solved first; otherwise antenna count remains a paper exercise.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

Solid invited synthesis that maps science drivers to free-flying vs lunar architectures and gives a usable six-point decade roadmap; no new result, but the framing and tall-pole list are worth having.

read the letter

This is a clean invited review, not a primary result. The useful core is the science-to-architecture map (science target → wavelength/resolution → baseline → free-flying / structurally connected / lunar surface, with the dominant risk named) plus the six explicit decisions in §7: fly an end-to-end stellar-fringe pathfinder, run small precursors on both free-flyer and lunar tracks in parallel, keep radio and optical lunar tracks separate, fund the two cross-cutting tall poles (visible/UV absolute metrology and cryogenic deep nulling), match concepts to actual flight opportunities, and treat international coordination as a choice rather than an afterthought.

What it does well: it is representative rather than exhaustive, tracks the cited concept studies and flight heritage (PROBA-3 mm formation, GRACE-FO nm ranging, LISA Pathfinder pm metrology, NOTT/NICE null depths, Chang’e-3 LUT dust performance, STARI/SEIRIOS/MoonLITE/LuSEE-Night), and is honest that most enabling tech is maturing as a byproduct of JWST/HWO/coronagraph work. Table 1 and the wavelength–baseline schematic make the trade space legible. The LILA GW strain case is correctly flagged as different in kind. Circularity is low; the load-bearing numbers sit on multi-institution studies and flown hardware, not on the author’s own NIAC reports alone.

Soft spots are real but proportionate. Novelty is organizational, not technical. The forward claim that byproduct maturation plus high-cadence pathfinders will carry the field is a programmatic contingency the paper itself lists as a decision of the decade, not a hidden premise that breaks the survey. Yield and TRL statements are taken from the sources rather than re-derived; that is fine for a review if readers treat them as such. No internal contradiction or mis-citation of heritage stands out.

Who it is for: anyone writing a decadal white paper, pathfinder proposal, or technology roadmap in space/lunar interferometry, exoplanet target prep for HWO, or far-side radio. Not for someone hunting a new algorithm or measurement. I would send it to peer review as a useful synthesis; a serious editor should not desk-reject it. Engage with it if you work in this space; cite the roadmap and the tall-pole list when you need a compact reference.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This invited review surveys free-flying, lunar-surface, structurally connected, and hybrid space-VLBI interferometry concepts. Its organizing claim is that the science target sets wavelength and angular resolution, which fix baseline, architecture, and dominant risk (Abstract; §2; Table 1). It maps mid-IR nulling (LIFE and related), lunar far-side radio (FARSIDE, FarView, LuSEE-Night), lunar UV/optical imaging and astrometry (AeSI, MoonLITE, KISS), far-IR (SPIRIT/SPICE), space VLBI (BHEX, SunRISE), X-ray concepts, and lunar GW interferometry (LILA). Shared enabling technologies—formation flying, absolute metrology, beam combination/nulling, cryogenics, autonomous deployment—are argued to mature largely as flagship byproducts and thereby govern which concepts fly. The paper closes with a six-point roadmap on pathfinders, dual-track risk reduction, tall poles, opportunity alignment, international coordination, and funding models (§7–7.1).

Significance. As a synthesis rather than a primary result, the paper’s value is organizational: it makes a diverse, multi-wavelength landscape legible via a science-to-architecture map (Table 1; Figure 1; Appendix A) and a shared technology matrix (Figure 2). Strengths include grounding of readiness claims in independent flight heritage (PROBA-3 mm-level formation, GRACE-FO nm ranging, LISA Pathfinder pm metrology) and multi-institution concept studies (LIFE yields, NOTT/NICE null depths, Chang’e-3 LUT dust performance), plus an explicit, actionable roadmap that treats free-flying and lunar tracks as complementary rather than mutually exclusive. If the community adopts the dual-track, high-cadence pathfinder sequencing and coordinated tall-pole investment argued in §7, the review can usefully shape near-term programmatic choices for exoplanet characterization, low-frequency cosmology, stellar imaging/astrometry for HWO, and mid-band GW science.

minor comments (6)

Several arXiv identifiers in the reference list appear to use future or nonstandard year stamps (e.g., [32] arXiv:2605.06648; [38] arXiv:2601.20823; [72] arXiv:2602.02279). Please verify and correct all arXiv IDs and years against the public record so readers can retrieve the sources.
Figure 1 notes state that filled boxes are qualitative architecture-readiness indicators, not formal NASA TRLs. Consider adding a one-line legend or caption note defining the qualitative scale (e.g., study / pathfinder / flight heritage) so the figure is self-contained.
§5.1 and §5.4: the ~10 nm absolute-metrology threshold for visible/UV imaging is stated clearly; a brief cross-reference to the wavelength-scaled OPD discussion for MIR nulling in the same paragraphs would help non-specialists see why MIR is comparatively more forgiving.
§4.1 and §7: MoonLITE and AeSI are presented as a natural ladder; a short explicit statement of what success metrics for MoonLITE (fringe detection, magnitude limit, OPD stability) would retire for AeSI would tighten the pathfinder logic.
Table 1 footnote on LILA correctly notes that it measures strain, not angular resolution. Ensure Figure 1 / Appendix A captions use the same wording so the GW row is not misread as an EM resolution pathway.
Minor copy-edits: Abstract and §1 use both “pathfinders” and “pathfinder payloads”; keep terminology consistent. A few long sentences in §7 (items 2 and 6) could be split for readability without changing content.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: invited survey organizes external concept studies and flight heritage without self-definitional predictions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is an invited review that maps science targets to wavelength, baseline, architecture, and risk (Abstract; §2 Table 1; Figure 1) and surveys free-flying, lunar, VLBI, and GW pathways. It contains no original derivation, yield equation, or parameter fit whose output is then called a prediction. Load-bearing technical claims rest on independent multi-institution studies (LIFE yield [5–8], FARSIDE/FarView [12–14], SPIRIT/SPICE [21,47], BHEX [22,23]) and flown heritage (PROBA-3 mm formation [18,19], GRACE-FO LRI [17], LISA Pathfinder [16], Chang’e-3 LUT [27]). Author-overlapping citations (AeSI NIAC [9,10], MoonLITE [33]) document concepts the author helped develop; they are not used as uniqueness theorems or to force the organizational claim. The forward-looking programmatic contingency (pathfinder funding, byproduct maturation of metrology/nulling) is explicitly framed as a decision of the coming decade (§5.4, §7), not as an internal premise required for the survey’s correctness. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper introduces no free parameters or invented physical entities. Its load-bearing premises are standard domain assumptions about angular resolution, platform trade-offs and the current maturity of formation-flying and cryogenic subsystems drawn from the cited literature.

axioms (4)

standard math Angular resolution of an interferometer scales as θ ≈ λ/B
Used throughout to map wavelength and baseline to science reach (Introduction, Figure 1, Appendix A).
domain assumption The lunar far side is the only radio-quiet site in the inner Solar System below ~30 MHz
Foundation of the FARSIDE/FarView science case (Section 4.2).
domain assumption Precision formation flying, absolute metrology, beam combination/nulling, cryogenics and autonomous deployment are the shared tall poles across free-flying and lunar concepts
Organizing claim of Section 5; treated as established by the cited flight and laboratory heritage.
domain assumption Technologies mature largely as byproducts of flagship programs (JWST, HWO, coronagraphs) rather than dedicated interferometry flight lines
Stated in abstract and Section 5.1; underpins the claim that effective TRL is rising without a dedicated mission.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 34306 in / 2433 out tokens · 33139 ms · 2026-07-10T19:49:49.521661+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

Space- and lunar-based interferometry are moving from aspiration toward a concrete landscape of mission studies, pathfinders, and staged architectures. This invited review surveys that landscape across two principal platform pathways: free-flying and lunar-surface interferometers - plus structurally connected designs and hybrid space-VLBI arrays. I trace how the science target sets the wavelength regime and angular resolution, which in turn fix the baseline, architecture, and implementation risk. Mid-infrared nulling concepts such as LIFE target temperate exoplanets through thermal-emission spectroscopy; lunar far-side radio arrays (FARSIDE, FarView) open the low-frequency Universe from the only radio-quiet site in the inner Solar System; lunar UV/optical concepts (Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager, MoonLITE) revisit imaging of stellar surfaces and open a path to microarcsecond astrometry for the dynamical masses that Habitable Worlds Observatory target selection requires; far-infrared interferometers (SPIRIT/SPICE), space VLBI (BHEX), and X-ray concepts extend the reach to planet formation, high-redshift galaxies, and black-hole physics; and lunar laser interferometry (LILA) applies the lunar platform to mid-band gravitational waves, measuring strain rather than angular position. Across this range, the concepts share enabling technologies - precision formation flying, absolute metrology, beam combination and nulling, cryogenics, and autonomous deployment - maturing largely as byproducts of flagship programs, a dynamic that increasingly governs which concepts become missions. I summarize the pathways in baseline, wavelength, science return, deployment strategy, and risk, and close with the decisions of the coming decade: pathfinder sequencing, technology tall poles, and the funding models that can carry technologies from laboratory demonstration to flight readiness.

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

[1]

FREE-FLYING SPACE INTERFEROMETRY 3.1 Mid-infrared nulling for exoplanets In nulling interferometry, the apertures are combined so that on-axis starlight destructively interferes and is suppressed – the interferometric analogue of a coronagraph – revealing the faint thermal emission of off-axis planetary companions. The free-flying Large Interferometer For...

work page 2024
[2]

flyby without the flyby,

LUNAR INTERFEROMETRY Having surveyed space-based concepts – free-flying formations and their structurally connected and single-spacecraft variants – we turn to the lunar surface, the second principal platform. Free-flying and surface-deployed architectures are best understood as a trade in which each removes the other's hardest problem. Free-flying archit...

work page 2025
[3]

long poles

ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES The concepts surveyed above diverge widely in science and architecture, yet they converge on a set of enabling capabilities. The same technologies recur across mission concepts and wavelengths, from a free-flying mid-infrared nuller to a lunar UV/optical array to a far-infrared imager (Figure 2). The subsections below take them in tu...

work page 2029
[4]

RELATIONSHIP TO GROUND INTERFEROMETRY AND LARGE-APERTURE FACILITIES Space-based interferometers complement rather than replace ground facilities, which occupy two ends of a trade. The CHARA Array holds the longest optical baselines, up to 331 m, achieving angular resolutions of 0.20 milliarcseconds (mas) in the visible and 0.7 mas in the K-band with 1-m-c...

work page 2026
[5]

The decade ahead will therefore be defined less by selecting a single 'winner' than by strategic choices that require international and cross-sector collaboration

ROADMAP AND KEY DECISIONS FOR THE COMING DECADE The concepts surveyed in this review are distinct in science and architecture, yet they rest on a shared interferometric logic, and, as Section 5 showed, on a shared technology base. The decade ahead will therefore be defined less by selecting a single 'winner' than by strategic choices that require internat...

work page
[6]

first stellar fringes from separated free-flying spacecraft in space,

First, fly at least one end-to-end astronomical formation-flying pathfinder. The constituent subsystems have largely been demonstrated in isolation: ESA’s PROBA-3 has retired much of the precision station-keeping and relative metrology risks, and STARI is designed to retire starlight acquisition, beam steering, and single-mode-fiber injection. However, no...

work page
[7]

the free-flyer versus lunar-surface fork

Second, even though many propose to resolve “the free-flyer versus lunar-surface fork”, I’d like to propose here a different approach: start small on each end, pursuing small-scale risk reduction on both frontiers: demonstrating initial feasibility and first fringes, through a rapid-iteration paradigm before scaling (fail fast, and build on what works). F...

work page 2010
[8]

Third, keep lunar radio and lunar optical on separate maturity tracks. The two diverge because their pacing dependency differs: lunar far-side radio rests on a quiet-environment science case with pathfinders, array concepts, and relay logic already largely in hand; whereas lunar optical interferometry depends more heavily on the long-term buildout of sust...

work page
[9]

Fourth, treat the two cross-cutting technology tall poles as the real near-term investment decision. (1) Absolute metrology at the ten-nanometer to tens-of-picometer level gates the visible/UV imaging and astrometric concepts; while (2) cryogenic deep nulling (targeting raw null depths of order 10 ⁻⁵ and effective depths approaching 10 ⁻⁸ via phase choppi...

work page
[10]

Fifth, recognize that near-term progress is often paced less by science or technology readiness than by opportunity availability. Several of the concepts reviewed here are mature enough to be proposed, but lack a competed flight line at the appropriate scale and cadence; the lunar precursors in particular have at times had no open, suitably-scoped federal...

work page
[11]

Sixth, treat international coordination as an explicit strategic choice. Space interferometry has transitioned into a genuinely multi-agency endeavor: JAXA is advancing dedicated formation-flying demonstrations [24, 34]; ESA maintains key mid-infrared exoplanet and X-ray initiatives alongside its precision formation-flying flight heritage; the United Stat...

work page
[12]

Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2,

CONCLUSIONS Space and lunar interferometry offer a unique and unparalleled range of opportunities for the next generation of high-angular-resolution observatories. As surveyed in this review, the different architectural tracks populate complementary regions of discovery space: free-flying mid-infrared nulling holds the strongest near-term case for the atm...

work page 2018
[13]

MATISSE, the VLTI mid-infrared imaging spectro-interferometer,

Lopez, B. et al., "MATISSE, the VLTI mid-infrared imaging spectro-interferometer," Astron. Astrophys. 659, A192 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Planet Formation Imager (PFI): Project update and future directions

Monnier, J. D., Kraus, S., Ireland, M. J., "Planet Formation Imager (PFI): project update and future directions," arXiv:2408.03896 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[15]

L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI with Asgard/NOTT: status and plans

Defrère, D. et al., "L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI with Asgard/NOTT," Proc. SPIE (2024); arXiv:2407.08397

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[16]

Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE): I,

Quanz, S. P. et al., "Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE): I," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A21 (2022). [6] Konrad, B. S. et al., "LIFE: III. Spectral resolution and sensitivity requirements," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A23 (2022)

work page 2022
[17]

LIFE: XIII. Combining thermal emission and reflected light,

Alei, E. et al., "LIFE: XIII. Combining thermal emission and reflected light," Astron. Astrophys. 689, A245 (2024). [8] Hansen, J. T., Ireland, M. J., "LIFE: IV. Ideal kernel-nulling array architectures," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A52 (2022)

work page 2024
[18]

Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer

Rau, G. et al., "Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): a lunar long-baseline UV/optical imaging interferometer," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024); arXiv:2408.04699

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[19]

NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts Phase I Final Report -- A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer: Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI)

Carpenter, K. G. et al., "AeSI NIAC Phase I Final Report," arXiv:2503.02105 (2025). [11] van Belle, G. et al., "Astronomical optical interferometry from the lunar surface," arXiv:2510.24901 (2025). [12] Burns, J. O. et al., "FARSIDE: a low radio frequency interferometric array on the lunar farside," NASA Probe Study (2019)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[20]

The Dark Ages Explorer (DEX): a filled-aperture ultra-long wavelength radio interferometer on the lunar far side

Brinkerink, C. et al., "The Dark Ages Explorer (DEX): a filled-aperture ultra-long wavelength radio interferometer on the lunar far side," arXiv:2504.03418 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[21]

FarView: An In-Situ Manufactured Lunar Far Side Radio Array Concept for 21-cm Dark Ages Cosmology

Polidan, R. S. et al., "FarView: an in-situ manufactured lunar far side radio array concept for 21-cm Dark Ages cosmology," Adv. Space Res. (2024); arXiv:2404.03840

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[22]

Design, modeling, and characterization of the antenna module for the LuSEE-Night mission,

S. D. Bale, et al., "Design, modeling, and characterization of the antenna module for the LuSEE-Night mission," in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X, Proc. SPIE 13092, 130927A (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Sub-femto-g free fall: LISA Pathfinder results,

Armano, M. et al., "Sub-femto-g free fall: LISA Pathfinder results," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231101 (2016). [17] Abich, K. et al., "In-orbit performance of the GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometer," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 031101 (2019)

work page 2016
[24]

Formation flying performances simulator for the shadow position sensors of the ESA PROBA-3 mission,

Capobianco, G., Focardi, M., Landini, F., et al., "Formation flying performances simulator for the shadow position sensors of the ESA PROBA-3 mission," Proc. SPIE 11852, 118526P (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

The ASPIICS solar coronagraph aboard the Proba-3 formation flying mission. Scientific objectives and instrument design

Zhukov, A. N. et al., "The ASPIICS solar coronagraph aboard the Proba-3 formation flying mission," arXiv:2509.00253 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[26]

STARI: STarlight Acquisition and Reflection toward Interferometry

J. D. Monnier et al., "Starlight Acquisition and Reflection toward Interferometry (STARI): A CubeSat Pathfinder," arXiv:2408.03925 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[27]

The Space Infrared Interferometric Telescope (SPIRIT): High-resolution imaging and spectroscopy in the far-infrared

Leisawitz, D. et al., "The Space Infrared Interferometric Telescope (SPIRIT): high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy in the far-infrared," Adv. Space Res. (2007); arXiv:0707.0883

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[28]

The Black Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Measurement

Johnson, M. D. et al., "The Black Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Measurement," arXiv:2406.09498 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[29]

SILVIA: Ultra-precision formation flying demonstration for space-based interferometry

Marrone, D. P. et al., "The Black Hole Explorer: instrument system overview," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024) [24] Ito, T. et al., "SILVIA: Ultra-precision formation flying demonstration for space-based interferometry," Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 77, 1080 (2025); arXiv:2504.05001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[30]

A Realistic Roadmap to Formation Flying Space Interferometry

Monnier, J. D. et al., "A realistic roadmap to formation-flying space interferometry," arXiv:1907.09583 (2019). [26] K. C. Gendreau et al., "MAXIM Pathfinder x-ray interferometry mission," Proc. SPIE 4851, 343–352 (2003); [https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461495](https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461495)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/12.461495 1907
[31]

Asgard/NOTT: L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI -- III. The mid-infrared integrated optics beam combiner for NOTT

Wang, J. et al., "The Lunar-based Ultraviolet Telescope (LUT) on Chang'e-3," Astrophys. Space Sci. 360, 10 (2015) [28] Sanny, A., Labadie, L. et al., "Asgard/NOTT: L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI – III. The mid-infrared integrated-optics beam combiner," Astron. Astrophys. (2026); arXiv:2511.19790

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[32]

Database of Candidate Targets for the LIFE Mission

Menti, F. et al., "Database of Candidate Targets for the LIFE Mission," Res. Notes AAS 8, 267 (2024); arXiv:2410.23892

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[33]

NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Science Gap List

Stapelfeldt, K., & Mamajek, E., et al. (2025), NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Science Gap List, JPL Document D-1792073-2, Rev. H, released January 7, 2025; arXiv:2507.18665

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[34]

Exoplanet explorer: a single spacecraft nulling interferometer,

Lueftinger, T., et al. (2025), "Exoplanet explorer: a single spacecraft nulling interferometer," Proc. SPIE 13699, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2024, 1369927. DOI: 10.1117/12.3072787

work page doi:10.1117/12.3072787 2025
[35]

A preliminary exploration of the effects of baseline length for the LIFE space mission

R. L. Garcia et al., "A preliminary exploration of the effects of baseline length for the LIFE space mission," arXiv:2605.06648 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[36]

MoonLITE: a CLPS-delivered NASA Astrophysics Pioneers lunar optical interferometer for sensitive, milliarcsecond observing

van Belle, G. T. et al., "MoonLITE: a CLPS-delivered NASA Astrophysics Pioneers lunar optical interferometer for sensitive, milliarcsecond observing," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024); arXiv:2408.01392

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[37]

High spatial resolution spectral imaging method for space interferometers and its application to formation-flying small satellites

Matsuo, T. et al., "SEIRIOS: high spatial resolution spectral imaging for formation-flying small-satellite stellar interferometry," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 8, 015001 (2022); arXiv:2201.07355

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[38]

Autonomous Guidance Navigation and Control of the VISORS Formation-Flying Mission

Guffanti, T. et al., "Autonomous guidance, navigation, and control of the VISORS formation-flying mission," arXiv:2309.16698 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[39]

Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Advancing the U.S. Priorities in Gravitational-wave and Lunar Science

Jani, K. et al., "Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): advancing U.S. priorities in gravitational-wave and lunar science," arXiv:2508.11631 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[40]

The Need for Ultra High Resolution X-ray Imaging,

Gaier, J.R. (2005). The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions. NASA/TM-2005-213610, NASA Glenn Research Center https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050160460 [38] Weaver, K. A. et al., "The Need for Ultra High Resolution X-ray Imaging," arXiv:2601.20823 (2026). [39] Ertel, S., et al. (2025), Review and Prospects of Hot Exozodiacal D...

work page arXiv 2005
[41]

Kilometric baseline space interferometry: comparison of free-flyer and Moon-based versions,

Ertel et al. 2020 (the HOSTS survey results, AJ 159, 177), DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7817 [41] Bély, P.-Y., Laurance, R., Volonte, S., et al. (1996), "Kilometric baseline space interferometry: comparison of free-flyer and Moon-based versions," ESA SCI(96)7, doi:10.1117/12.255123

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7817 2020
[42]

Darwin: a mission overview,

A. Karlsson, L. d'Arcio, R. den Hartog, and M. Fridlund, "Darwin: a mission overview," in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, Proc. SPIE 6265, 62651O (2006); doi: 10.1117/12.669791

work page doi:10.1117/12.669791 2006
[43]

Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer technology status and plans,

P. R. Lawson et al., "Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer technology status and plans," Proc. SPIE 6268, 626828 (2006); doi: 10.1117/12.670318

work page doi:10.1117/12.670318 2006
[44]

The Fourier-Kelvin Stellar Interferometer (FKSI): a review, progress report, and update,

W. C. Danchi, R. K. Barry, P. R. Lawson, W. A. Traub, and S. Unwin, "The Fourier-Kelvin Stellar Interferometer (FKSI): a review, progress report, and update," Proc. SPIE 7013, Optical and Infrared Interferometry, 70132Q (2008). [doi:10.1117/12.790649]

work page doi:10.1117/12.790649 2008
[45]

Exoplanet detection yield of a space-based Bracewell interferometer,

C. Dandumont, D. Defrère, J. Kammerer, O. Absil, S. P. Quanz, and J. Loicq, "Exoplanet detection yield of a space-based Bracewell interferometer," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 6(3), 035004 (2020). [doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.6.3.035004]

work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.6.3.035004 2020
[46]

Pegase: a space-based nulling interferometer,

J. M. Le Duigou, M. Ollivier, A. Léger, F. Cassaing, B. Sorrente, B. Fleury, and G. Rousset, "Pegase: a space-based nulling interferometer," Proc. SPIE 6265, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, 62651N (2006). [doi:10.1117/12.671091]

work page doi:10.1117/12.671091 2006
[47]

The Space Interferometer for Cosmic Evolution (SPICE) Far-IR Probe,

Leisawitz, D., Aalto, S., Bergner, J., Bonato, M., Bracken, C., Eales, S., and Farrah, D., "The Space Interferometer for Cosmic Evolution (SPICE) Far-IR Probe," Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 55(2), 160.04 (2023)

work page 2023
[48]

Weather on the Moon,

NASA, "Weather on the Moon," NASA Science Solar System Exploration (2024). [https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/](https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/) (Accessed 2026)

work page 2024
[49]

D., Felikson, D., Sabaka, T

Loomis, B. D., Felikson, D., Sabaka, T. J., & Medley, B. (2021). High-spatial-resolution mass rates from GRACE and GRACE-FO: Global and ice sheet analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(12), e2021JB023024

work page 2021
[50]

The SPace-based InterFerometer Feasibility (SPIFF) Project: Enabling Future High-Resolution Astronomy Across the EM Spectrum,

https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/programs/physics-of-the-cosmos/studies/astra-initiative/ [51] B. V. Ricketti et al., "The SPace-based InterFerometer Feasibility (SPIFF) Project: Enabling Future High-Resolution Astronomy Across the EM Spectrum," UK Space Agency Frontiers 2035 Community White Paper , arXiv:2512.10009 (2025)

work page arXiv 2035
[51]

Protection of Astronomy and Science on the Moon," Conference Room Paper, UN COPUOS Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, 61st Sess., Doc. A/AC.105/C.1/2024/CRP.14, UNOOSA (2024), https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2024/aac_105c_12024crp/aac_105c_12024crp_14_0_html/AC105_C1_2024_CRP14E.pdf [53] Krolikowski A, Elvis M. Potential and perils: ...

work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2023.0078 2024
[52]

Reinforcement Learning for Data-Driven Workflows in Radio Interferometry. I. Principal Demonstration in Calibration

Kirk, B. M., Rau, U., and Ramyaa, R., “Reinforcement Learning for Data-Driven Workflows in Radio Interferometry. I. Principal Demonstration in Calibration,” arXiv:2410.17135 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[53]

VIPCALs: A fully-automated calibration pipeline for VLBI data,

Álvarez-Ortega, D., Casadio, C., Pötzl, F. M., Kumar, A., and Janssen, M., “VIPCALs: A fully-automated calibration pipeline for VLBI data,” arXiv:2508.13282 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

RFI Identification Based On Deep-Learning]{A Robust RFI Identification For Radio Interferometry based on a Convolutional Neural Network

Sun, H. et al., “A robust RFI identification for radio interferometry based on a convolutional neural network,” arXiv:2203.00298 (2022)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[55]

Exploring Exoplanets with Interferometry,

Quanz, S. P., Mennesson, B., Beichman, C., et al., "Exploring Exoplanets with Interferometry," W. M. Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) report (2026)

work page 2026
[56]

Overview of the SIM PlanetQuest Light (SIM-Lite) mission concept

Goullioud, R., Catanzarite, J. H., Dekens, F. G., Shao, M., & Marr, J. C. IV, "Overview of the SIM PlanetQuest Light (SIM-Lite) mission concept," Proc. SPIE 7013, 70134T (2008); arXiv:0807.1668

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[57]

SIM-PlanetQuest technology: A retrospective view,

Marr, J. C. IV, et al., "SIM-PlanetQuest technology: A retrospective view," Acta Astronautica (2009). [60] Alibay, F., Kasper, J. C., Lazio, T. J. W., and Neilsen, T., "Sun radio interferometer space experiment (SunRISE): Tracking particle acceleration and transport in the inner heliosphere," in 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1-15 (2017). doi:10.1109/aer...

work page doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943789 2009
[58]

Optical Intensity Interferometry with Atmospheric Cerenkov Telescope Arrays,

Le Bohec, S. and Holder, J., "Optical Intensity Interferometry with Atmospheric Cerenkov Telescope Arrays," Astrophys. J. 649(1), 399-405 (2006). [See also: Dravins, D. et al., "Optical intensity interferometry with the Cherenkov Telescope Array," Astropart. Phys. 43, 331-347 (2013)]

work page 2006
[59]

Optical intensity interferometry observations using the MAGIC imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes,

Acciari, V. A., Bernardos, M. I., Colombo, E., et al., "Optical intensity interferometry observations using the MAGIC imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes," Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491(2), 1540-1547 (2020). doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3171

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3171 2020
[60]

The angular diameters of 32 stars,

Hanbury Brown, R., Davis, J., and Allen, L. R., "The angular diameters of 32 stars," Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 167(1), 121-136 (1974). doi:10.1113/j.1365-2966.1974.tb01438.x

work page doi:10.1113/j.1365-2966.1974.tb01438.x 1974
[61]

Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light,

Hanbury Brown, R. and Twiss, R. Q., "Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light," Nature 177(4497), 27–29 (1956). doi:10.1038/177027a0

work page doi:10.1038/177027a0 1956
[62]

Imaging the surface of Altair,

Monnier, J. D., Zhao, M., Pedretti, E., Thureau, N., Ireland, M., Muirhead, P., Berger, J.-P., Millan-Gabet, R., Van Belle, G., ten Brummelaar, T., McAlister, H., Ridgway, S., Turner, N., Sturmann, L., Sturmann, J., Berger, D., "Imaging the surface of Altair," Science 317(5836), 342–345 (2007); doi:10.1126/science.1143205

work page doi:10.1126/science.1143205 2007
[63]

No Sun-like dynamo on the active star ζ Andromedae from starspot asymmetry,

Roettenbacher, R. M., Monnier, J. D., Korhonen, H., et al., "No Sun-like dynamo on the active star ζ Andromedae from starspot asymmetry," Nature 533, 217–220 (2016); doi:10.1038/nature17444

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/nature17444 2016
[64]

First direct detection of an exoplanet by optical interferometry: Astrometry and K-band spectroscopy of HR 8799 e,

GRAVITY Collaboration: Lacour, S., Nowak, M., Wang, J., et al., "First direct detection of an exoplanet by optical interferometry: Astrometry and K-band spectroscopy of HR 8799 e," Astron. Astrophys. 623, L11 (2019); doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935253

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935253 2019
[65]

Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry. II. Calibration of the period–radius and period–luminosity relations,

Kervella, P., Bersier, D., Mourard, D., Nardetto, N., Fouqué, P., Coudé du Foresto, V., "Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry. II. Calibration of the period–radius and period–luminosity relations," Astron. Astrophys. 423, 327–333 (2004)

work page 2004
[66]

The Design of a Drag-Free CubeSat and the Housing for its Gravitational Reference Sensor

Zanoni, C., Alfauwaz, A., Aljadaan, A., et al. "The design of a drag-free CubeSat and the housing for its gravitational reference sensor," Proc. 2nd IAA Conf. on University Satellite Missions and CubeSat Workshop (2016); arXiv:1605.05496

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[67]

A simplified gravitational reference sensor for satellite geodesy,

Dávila Álvarez, A., Knudtson, A., Patel, U., Gleason, J., Hollis, H., Sanjuan, J., Doughty, N., McDaniel, G., Lee, J., Leitch, J., Bennett, S., Bevilacqua, R., Mueller, G., Spero, R., Ware, B., Wass, P., Wiese, D., Ziemer, J., and Conklin, J. W., "A simplified gravitational reference sensor for satellite geodesy," J. Geod. 96, 49 (2022). doi:10.1007/s0019...

work page doi:10.1007/s00190-022-01659-0 2022
[68]

The Nulling Interferometry Cryogenic Experiment (NICE): Architecture, requirements, and preliminary warm precursor results

Conklin, J. W., "Gravitational Reference Sensor Technology Development Roadmap for the Mass Change Mission," NASA Science Technology Report, NASA ESTO (2020) https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GRS_Technology_Summary_and_Roadmap_TAGGED.pdf [72] Birbacher, T., Hansen, J. T., Dannert, F. A., Garreau, G., Glauser, A. M., Meierhofer, R., Jimén...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[69]

First light for GRAVITY Wide. Large separation fringe tracking for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer,

GRAVITY+ Collaboration, et al., "First light for GRAVITY Wide. Large separation fringe tracking for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer," Astron. Astrophys. 665, A75 (2022)

work page 2022

[1] [1]

FREE-FLYING SPACE INTERFEROMETRY 3.1 Mid-infrared nulling for exoplanets In nulling interferometry, the apertures are combined so that on-axis starlight destructively interferes and is suppressed – the interferometric analogue of a coronagraph – revealing the faint thermal emission of off-axis planetary companions. The free-flying Large Interferometer For...

work page 2024

[2] [2]

flyby without the flyby,

LUNAR INTERFEROMETRY Having surveyed space-based concepts – free-flying formations and their structurally connected and single-spacecraft variants – we turn to the lunar surface, the second principal platform. Free-flying and surface-deployed architectures are best understood as a trade in which each removes the other's hardest problem. Free-flying archit...

work page 2025

[3] [3]

long poles

ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES The concepts surveyed above diverge widely in science and architecture, yet they converge on a set of enabling capabilities. The same technologies recur across mission concepts and wavelengths, from a free-flying mid-infrared nuller to a lunar UV/optical array to a far-infrared imager (Figure 2). The subsections below take them in tu...

work page 2029

[4] [4]

RELATIONSHIP TO GROUND INTERFEROMETRY AND LARGE-APERTURE FACILITIES Space-based interferometers complement rather than replace ground facilities, which occupy two ends of a trade. The CHARA Array holds the longest optical baselines, up to 331 m, achieving angular resolutions of 0.20 milliarcseconds (mas) in the visible and 0.7 mas in the K-band with 1-m-c...

work page 2026

[5] [5]

The decade ahead will therefore be defined less by selecting a single 'winner' than by strategic choices that require international and cross-sector collaboration

ROADMAP AND KEY DECISIONS FOR THE COMING DECADE The concepts surveyed in this review are distinct in science and architecture, yet they rest on a shared interferometric logic, and, as Section 5 showed, on a shared technology base. The decade ahead will therefore be defined less by selecting a single 'winner' than by strategic choices that require internat...

work page

[6] [6]

first stellar fringes from separated free-flying spacecraft in space,

First, fly at least one end-to-end astronomical formation-flying pathfinder. The constituent subsystems have largely been demonstrated in isolation: ESA’s PROBA-3 has retired much of the precision station-keeping and relative metrology risks, and STARI is designed to retire starlight acquisition, beam steering, and single-mode-fiber injection. However, no...

work page

[7] [7]

the free-flyer versus lunar-surface fork

Second, even though many propose to resolve “the free-flyer versus lunar-surface fork”, I’d like to propose here a different approach: start small on each end, pursuing small-scale risk reduction on both frontiers: demonstrating initial feasibility and first fringes, through a rapid-iteration paradigm before scaling (fail fast, and build on what works). F...

work page 2010

[8] [8]

Third, keep lunar radio and lunar optical on separate maturity tracks. The two diverge because their pacing dependency differs: lunar far-side radio rests on a quiet-environment science case with pathfinders, array concepts, and relay logic already largely in hand; whereas lunar optical interferometry depends more heavily on the long-term buildout of sust...

work page

[9] [9]

Fourth, treat the two cross-cutting technology tall poles as the real near-term investment decision. (1) Absolute metrology at the ten-nanometer to tens-of-picometer level gates the visible/UV imaging and astrometric concepts; while (2) cryogenic deep nulling (targeting raw null depths of order 10 ⁻⁵ and effective depths approaching 10 ⁻⁸ via phase choppi...

work page

[10] [10]

Fifth, recognize that near-term progress is often paced less by science or technology readiness than by opportunity availability. Several of the concepts reviewed here are mature enough to be proposed, but lack a competed flight line at the appropriate scale and cadence; the lunar precursors in particular have at times had no open, suitably-scoped federal...

work page

[11] [11]

Sixth, treat international coordination as an explicit strategic choice. Space interferometry has transitioned into a genuinely multi-agency endeavor: JAXA is advancing dedicated formation-flying demonstrations [24, 34]; ESA maintains key mid-infrared exoplanet and X-ray initiatives alongside its precision formation-flying flight heritage; the United Stat...

work page

[12] [12]

Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2,

CONCLUSIONS Space and lunar interferometry offer a unique and unparalleled range of opportunities for the next generation of high-angular-resolution observatories. As surveyed in this review, the different architectural tracks populate complementary regions of discovery space: free-flying mid-infrared nulling holds the strongest near-term case for the atm...

work page 2018

[13] [13]

MATISSE, the VLTI mid-infrared imaging spectro-interferometer,

Lopez, B. et al., "MATISSE, the VLTI mid-infrared imaging spectro-interferometer," Astron. Astrophys. 659, A192 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Planet Formation Imager (PFI): Project update and future directions

Monnier, J. D., Kraus, S., Ireland, M. J., "Planet Formation Imager (PFI): project update and future directions," arXiv:2408.03896 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[15] [15]

L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI with Asgard/NOTT: status and plans

Defrère, D. et al., "L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI with Asgard/NOTT," Proc. SPIE (2024); arXiv:2407.08397

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[16] [16]

Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE): I,

Quanz, S. P. et al., "Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE): I," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A21 (2022). [6] Konrad, B. S. et al., "LIFE: III. Spectral resolution and sensitivity requirements," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A23 (2022)

work page 2022

[17] [17]

LIFE: XIII. Combining thermal emission and reflected light,

Alei, E. et al., "LIFE: XIII. Combining thermal emission and reflected light," Astron. Astrophys. 689, A245 (2024). [8] Hansen, J. T., Ireland, M. J., "LIFE: IV. Ideal kernel-nulling array architectures," Astron. Astrophys. 664, A52 (2022)

work page 2024

[18] [18]

Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer

Rau, G. et al., "Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): a lunar long-baseline UV/optical imaging interferometer," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024); arXiv:2408.04699

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[19] [19]

NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts Phase I Final Report -- A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer: Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI)

Carpenter, K. G. et al., "AeSI NIAC Phase I Final Report," arXiv:2503.02105 (2025). [11] van Belle, G. et al., "Astronomical optical interferometry from the lunar surface," arXiv:2510.24901 (2025). [12] Burns, J. O. et al., "FARSIDE: a low radio frequency interferometric array on the lunar farside," NASA Probe Study (2019)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[20] [20]

The Dark Ages Explorer (DEX): a filled-aperture ultra-long wavelength radio interferometer on the lunar far side

Brinkerink, C. et al., "The Dark Ages Explorer (DEX): a filled-aperture ultra-long wavelength radio interferometer on the lunar far side," arXiv:2504.03418 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[21] [21]

FarView: An In-Situ Manufactured Lunar Far Side Radio Array Concept for 21-cm Dark Ages Cosmology

Polidan, R. S. et al., "FarView: an in-situ manufactured lunar far side radio array concept for 21-cm Dark Ages cosmology," Adv. Space Res. (2024); arXiv:2404.03840

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[22] [22]

Design, modeling, and characterization of the antenna module for the LuSEE-Night mission,

S. D. Bale, et al., "Design, modeling, and characterization of the antenna module for the LuSEE-Night mission," in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X, Proc. SPIE 13092, 130927A (2024)

work page 2024

[23] [23]

Sub-femto-g free fall: LISA Pathfinder results,

Armano, M. et al., "Sub-femto-g free fall: LISA Pathfinder results," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231101 (2016). [17] Abich, K. et al., "In-orbit performance of the GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometer," Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 031101 (2019)

work page 2016

[24] [24]

Formation flying performances simulator for the shadow position sensors of the ESA PROBA-3 mission,

Capobianco, G., Focardi, M., Landini, F., et al., "Formation flying performances simulator for the shadow position sensors of the ESA PROBA-3 mission," Proc. SPIE 11852, 118526P (2021)

work page 2021

[25] [25]

The ASPIICS solar coronagraph aboard the Proba-3 formation flying mission. Scientific objectives and instrument design

Zhukov, A. N. et al., "The ASPIICS solar coronagraph aboard the Proba-3 formation flying mission," arXiv:2509.00253 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[26] [26]

STARI: STarlight Acquisition and Reflection toward Interferometry

J. D. Monnier et al., "Starlight Acquisition and Reflection toward Interferometry (STARI): A CubeSat Pathfinder," arXiv:2408.03925 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[27] [27]

The Space Infrared Interferometric Telescope (SPIRIT): High-resolution imaging and spectroscopy in the far-infrared

Leisawitz, D. et al., "The Space Infrared Interferometric Telescope (SPIRIT): high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy in the far-infrared," Adv. Space Res. (2007); arXiv:0707.0883

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[28] [28]

The Black Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Measurement

Johnson, M. D. et al., "The Black Hole Explorer: Photon Ring Science, Detection and Shape Measurement," arXiv:2406.09498 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

SILVIA: Ultra-precision formation flying demonstration for space-based interferometry

Marrone, D. P. et al., "The Black Hole Explorer: instrument system overview," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024) [24] Ito, T. et al., "SILVIA: Ultra-precision formation flying demonstration for space-based interferometry," Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 77, 1080 (2025); arXiv:2504.05001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[30] [30]

A Realistic Roadmap to Formation Flying Space Interferometry

Monnier, J. D. et al., "A realistic roadmap to formation-flying space interferometry," arXiv:1907.09583 (2019). [26] K. C. Gendreau et al., "MAXIM Pathfinder x-ray interferometry mission," Proc. SPIE 4851, 343–352 (2003); [https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461495](https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461495)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1117/12.461495 1907

[31] [31]

Asgard/NOTT: L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI -- III. The mid-infrared integrated optics beam combiner for NOTT

Wang, J. et al., "The Lunar-based Ultraviolet Telescope (LUT) on Chang'e-3," Astrophys. Space Sci. 360, 10 (2015) [28] Sanny, A., Labadie, L. et al., "Asgard/NOTT: L-band nulling interferometry at the VLTI – III. The mid-infrared integrated-optics beam combiner," Astron. Astrophys. (2026); arXiv:2511.19790

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[32] [32]

Database of Candidate Targets for the LIFE Mission

Menti, F. et al., "Database of Candidate Targets for the LIFE Mission," Res. Notes AAS 8, 267 (2024); arXiv:2410.23892

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[33] [33]

NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Science Gap List

Stapelfeldt, K., & Mamajek, E., et al. (2025), NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program (ExEP) Science Gap List, JPL Document D-1792073-2, Rev. H, released January 7, 2025; arXiv:2507.18665

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[34] [34]

Exoplanet explorer: a single spacecraft nulling interferometer,

Lueftinger, T., et al. (2025), "Exoplanet explorer: a single spacecraft nulling interferometer," Proc. SPIE 13699, International Conference on Space Optics – ICSO 2024, 1369927. DOI: 10.1117/12.3072787

work page doi:10.1117/12.3072787 2025

[35] [35]

A preliminary exploration of the effects of baseline length for the LIFE space mission

R. L. Garcia et al., "A preliminary exploration of the effects of baseline length for the LIFE space mission," arXiv:2605.06648 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[36] [36]

MoonLITE: a CLPS-delivered NASA Astrophysics Pioneers lunar optical interferometer for sensitive, milliarcsecond observing

van Belle, G. T. et al., "MoonLITE: a CLPS-delivered NASA Astrophysics Pioneers lunar optical interferometer for sensitive, milliarcsecond observing," Proc. SPIE 13092 (2024); arXiv:2408.01392

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[37] [37]

High spatial resolution spectral imaging method for space interferometers and its application to formation-flying small satellites

Matsuo, T. et al., "SEIRIOS: high spatial resolution spectral imaging for formation-flying small-satellite stellar interferometry," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 8, 015001 (2022); arXiv:2201.07355

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[38] [38]

Autonomous Guidance Navigation and Control of the VISORS Formation-Flying Mission

Guffanti, T. et al., "Autonomous guidance, navigation, and control of the VISORS formation-flying mission," arXiv:2309.16698 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[39] [39]

Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Advancing the U.S. Priorities in Gravitational-wave and Lunar Science

Jani, K. et al., "Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): advancing U.S. priorities in gravitational-wave and lunar science," arXiv:2508.11631 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[40] [40]

The Need for Ultra High Resolution X-ray Imaging,

Gaier, J.R. (2005). The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions. NASA/TM-2005-213610, NASA Glenn Research Center https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050160460 [38] Weaver, K. A. et al., "The Need for Ultra High Resolution X-ray Imaging," arXiv:2601.20823 (2026). [39] Ertel, S., et al. (2025), Review and Prospects of Hot Exozodiacal D...

work page arXiv 2005

[41] [41]

Kilometric baseline space interferometry: comparison of free-flyer and Moon-based versions,

Ertel et al. 2020 (the HOSTS survey results, AJ 159, 177), DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7817 [41] Bély, P.-Y., Laurance, R., Volonte, S., et al. (1996), "Kilometric baseline space interferometry: comparison of free-flyer and Moon-based versions," ESA SCI(96)7, doi:10.1117/12.255123

work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7817 2020

[42] [42]

Darwin: a mission overview,

A. Karlsson, L. d'Arcio, R. den Hartog, and M. Fridlund, "Darwin: a mission overview," in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, Proc. SPIE 6265, 62651O (2006); doi: 10.1117/12.669791

work page doi:10.1117/12.669791 2006

[43] [43]

Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer technology status and plans,

P. R. Lawson et al., "Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer technology status and plans," Proc. SPIE 6268, 626828 (2006); doi: 10.1117/12.670318

work page doi:10.1117/12.670318 2006

[44] [44]

The Fourier-Kelvin Stellar Interferometer (FKSI): a review, progress report, and update,

W. C. Danchi, R. K. Barry, P. R. Lawson, W. A. Traub, and S. Unwin, "The Fourier-Kelvin Stellar Interferometer (FKSI): a review, progress report, and update," Proc. SPIE 7013, Optical and Infrared Interferometry, 70132Q (2008). [doi:10.1117/12.790649]

work page doi:10.1117/12.790649 2008

[45] [45]

Exoplanet detection yield of a space-based Bracewell interferometer,

C. Dandumont, D. Defrère, J. Kammerer, O. Absil, S. P. Quanz, and J. Loicq, "Exoplanet detection yield of a space-based Bracewell interferometer," J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 6(3), 035004 (2020). [doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.6.3.035004]

work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.6.3.035004 2020

[46] [46]

Pegase: a space-based nulling interferometer,

J. M. Le Duigou, M. Ollivier, A. Léger, F. Cassaing, B. Sorrente, B. Fleury, and G. Rousset, "Pegase: a space-based nulling interferometer," Proc. SPIE 6265, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter, 62651N (2006). [doi:10.1117/12.671091]

work page doi:10.1117/12.671091 2006

[47] [47]

The Space Interferometer for Cosmic Evolution (SPICE) Far-IR Probe,

Leisawitz, D., Aalto, S., Bergner, J., Bonato, M., Bracken, C., Eales, S., and Farrah, D., "The Space Interferometer for Cosmic Evolution (SPICE) Far-IR Probe," Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 55(2), 160.04 (2023)

work page 2023

[48] [48]

Weather on the Moon,

NASA, "Weather on the Moon," NASA Science Solar System Exploration (2024). [https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/](https://science.nasa.gov/moon/weather-on-the-moon/) (Accessed 2026)

work page 2024

[49] [49]

D., Felikson, D., Sabaka, T

Loomis, B. D., Felikson, D., Sabaka, T. J., & Medley, B. (2021). High-spatial-resolution mass rates from GRACE and GRACE-FO: Global and ice sheet analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(12), e2021JB023024

work page 2021

[50] [50]

The SPace-based InterFerometer Feasibility (SPIFF) Project: Enabling Future High-Resolution Astronomy Across the EM Spectrum,

https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/programs/physics-of-the-cosmos/studies/astra-initiative/ [51] B. V. Ricketti et al., "The SPace-based InterFerometer Feasibility (SPIFF) Project: Enabling Future High-Resolution Astronomy Across the EM Spectrum," UK Space Agency Frontiers 2035 Community White Paper , arXiv:2512.10009 (2025)

work page arXiv 2035

[51] [51]

Protection of Astronomy and Science on the Moon," Conference Room Paper, UN COPUOS Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, 61st Sess., Doc. A/AC.105/C.1/2024/CRP.14, UNOOSA (2024), https://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2024/aac_105c_12024crp/aac_105c_12024crp_14_0_html/AC105_C1_2024_CRP14E.pdf [53] Krolikowski A, Elvis M. Potential and perils: ...

work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2023.0078 2024

[52] [52]

Reinforcement Learning for Data-Driven Workflows in Radio Interferometry. I. Principal Demonstration in Calibration

Kirk, B. M., Rau, U., and Ramyaa, R., “Reinforcement Learning for Data-Driven Workflows in Radio Interferometry. I. Principal Demonstration in Calibration,” arXiv:2410.17135 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[53] [53]

VIPCALs: A fully-automated calibration pipeline for VLBI data,

Álvarez-Ortega, D., Casadio, C., Pötzl, F. M., Kumar, A., and Janssen, M., “VIPCALs: A fully-automated calibration pipeline for VLBI data,” arXiv:2508.13282 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[54] [54]

RFI Identification Based On Deep-Learning]{A Robust RFI Identification For Radio Interferometry based on a Convolutional Neural Network

Sun, H. et al., “A robust RFI identification for radio interferometry based on a convolutional neural network,” arXiv:2203.00298 (2022)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[55] [55]

Exploring Exoplanets with Interferometry,

Quanz, S. P., Mennesson, B., Beichman, C., et al., "Exploring Exoplanets with Interferometry," W. M. Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) report (2026)

work page 2026

[56] [56]

Overview of the SIM PlanetQuest Light (SIM-Lite) mission concept

Goullioud, R., Catanzarite, J. H., Dekens, F. G., Shao, M., & Marr, J. C. IV, "Overview of the SIM PlanetQuest Light (SIM-Lite) mission concept," Proc. SPIE 7013, 70134T (2008); arXiv:0807.1668

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[57] [57]

SIM-PlanetQuest technology: A retrospective view,

Marr, J. C. IV, et al., "SIM-PlanetQuest technology: A retrospective view," Acta Astronautica (2009). [60] Alibay, F., Kasper, J. C., Lazio, T. J. W., and Neilsen, T., "Sun radio interferometer space experiment (SunRISE): Tracking particle acceleration and transport in the inner heliosphere," in 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1-15 (2017). doi:10.1109/aer...

work page doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943789 2009

[58] [58]

Optical Intensity Interferometry with Atmospheric Cerenkov Telescope Arrays,

Le Bohec, S. and Holder, J., "Optical Intensity Interferometry with Atmospheric Cerenkov Telescope Arrays," Astrophys. J. 649(1), 399-405 (2006). [See also: Dravins, D. et al., "Optical intensity interferometry with the Cherenkov Telescope Array," Astropart. Phys. 43, 331-347 (2013)]

work page 2006

[59] [59]

Optical intensity interferometry observations using the MAGIC imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes,

Acciari, V. A., Bernardos, M. I., Colombo, E., et al., "Optical intensity interferometry observations using the MAGIC imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes," Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491(2), 1540-1547 (2020). doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3171

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3171 2020

[60] [60]

The angular diameters of 32 stars,

Hanbury Brown, R., Davis, J., and Allen, L. R., "The angular diameters of 32 stars," Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 167(1), 121-136 (1974). doi:10.1113/j.1365-2966.1974.tb01438.x

work page doi:10.1113/j.1365-2966.1974.tb01438.x 1974

[61] [61]

Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light,

Hanbury Brown, R. and Twiss, R. Q., "Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light," Nature 177(4497), 27–29 (1956). doi:10.1038/177027a0

work page doi:10.1038/177027a0 1956

[62] [62]

Imaging the surface of Altair,

Monnier, J. D., Zhao, M., Pedretti, E., Thureau, N., Ireland, M., Muirhead, P., Berger, J.-P., Millan-Gabet, R., Van Belle, G., ten Brummelaar, T., McAlister, H., Ridgway, S., Turner, N., Sturmann, L., Sturmann, J., Berger, D., "Imaging the surface of Altair," Science 317(5836), 342–345 (2007); doi:10.1126/science.1143205

work page doi:10.1126/science.1143205 2007

[63] [63]

No Sun-like dynamo on the active star ζ Andromedae from starspot asymmetry,

Roettenbacher, R. M., Monnier, J. D., Korhonen, H., et al., "No Sun-like dynamo on the active star ζ Andromedae from starspot asymmetry," Nature 533, 217–220 (2016); doi:10.1038/nature17444

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/nature17444 2016

[64] [64]

First direct detection of an exoplanet by optical interferometry: Astrometry and K-band spectroscopy of HR 8799 e,

GRAVITY Collaboration: Lacour, S., Nowak, M., Wang, J., et al., "First direct detection of an exoplanet by optical interferometry: Astrometry and K-band spectroscopy of HR 8799 e," Astron. Astrophys. 623, L11 (2019); doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935253

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935253 2019

[65] [65]

Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry. II. Calibration of the period–radius and period–luminosity relations,

Kervella, P., Bersier, D., Mourard, D., Nardetto, N., Fouqué, P., Coudé du Foresto, V., "Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry. II. Calibration of the period–radius and period–luminosity relations," Astron. Astrophys. 423, 327–333 (2004)

work page 2004

[66] [66]

The Design of a Drag-Free CubeSat and the Housing for its Gravitational Reference Sensor

Zanoni, C., Alfauwaz, A., Aljadaan, A., et al. "The design of a drag-free CubeSat and the housing for its gravitational reference sensor," Proc. 2nd IAA Conf. on University Satellite Missions and CubeSat Workshop (2016); arXiv:1605.05496

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[67] [67]

A simplified gravitational reference sensor for satellite geodesy,

Dávila Álvarez, A., Knudtson, A., Patel, U., Gleason, J., Hollis, H., Sanjuan, J., Doughty, N., McDaniel, G., Lee, J., Leitch, J., Bennett, S., Bevilacqua, R., Mueller, G., Spero, R., Ware, B., Wass, P., Wiese, D., Ziemer, J., and Conklin, J. W., "A simplified gravitational reference sensor for satellite geodesy," J. Geod. 96, 49 (2022). doi:10.1007/s0019...

work page doi:10.1007/s00190-022-01659-0 2022

[68] [68]

The Nulling Interferometry Cryogenic Experiment (NICE): Architecture, requirements, and preliminary warm precursor results

Conklin, J. W., "Gravitational Reference Sensor Technology Development Roadmap for the Mass Change Mission," NASA Science Technology Report, NASA ESTO (2020) https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GRS_Technology_Summary_and_Roadmap_TAGGED.pdf [72] Birbacher, T., Hansen, J. T., Dannert, F. A., Garreau, G., Glauser, A. M., Meierhofer, R., Jimén...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[69] [69]

First light for GRAVITY Wide. Large separation fringe tracking for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer,

GRAVITY+ Collaboration, et al., "First light for GRAVITY Wide. Large separation fringe tracking for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer," Astron. Astrophys. 665, A75 (2022)

work page 2022