Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 9 minor 238 references

Squashed flux tubes heat the corona as much as expansion does

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-10 01:15 UTC pith:PTUJA3IF

load-bearing objection Geometry-complete multiscale RMHD transport theory with energy-consistent coupling of squashing, curvature, gravity, and transverse gradients; quantitative predictions rest on an untested slaved-field closure the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08036 v1 pith:PTUJA3IF submitted 2026-07-09 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph

A Transport Theory of Turbulent Coronal Heating in General Geometry

Jonathan Squire , Benjamin D. G. Chandran , Toby Adkins , William A. Clarke , Romain Meyrand , Matthew W. Kunz This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph
keywords coronal heatingsolar windMHD turbulencereduced MHDmultiscale transportAlfvén wavesmagnetic geometrysquashing factor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a multiscale transport theory for reduced-MHD turbulence in an arbitrary magnetic background, showing that several geometry-driven effects—flux-tube squashing, field-line curvature, gravity, and transverse gradients—enter the wave equations at the same formal order as the standard reflection of Alfvén waves by expansion. In smooth coronal-hole interiors the theory reduces to the familiar picture: outward Alfvénic waves reflect off parallel gradients of the Alfvén speed, generating counter-propagating fluctuations that cascade and dissipate. But in structured regions—near coronal-hole boundaries, streamer edges, and open-closed interfaces—these additional geometric channels can dominate. Squashing of the field-line mapping drives reflection even where the Alfvén speed is locally flat. Curvature and gravity couple Alfvénic waves to compressive (slow-mode and entropy) fluctuations, which then feed back on the Alfvénic sector or catalyze further reflection. And outward Alfvénic waves mediate the relaxation of cross-field velocity shear into heat, with an efficiency that grows as the wind becomes super-Alfvénic. The same dynamics drive cross-field transport of mass, composition, momentum, and heat across open-closed boundaries at rates that can rival the field-parallel supply from the coronal base. Taken together, these effects bias heating toward low altitudes in structured regions, providing a physical mechanism for the empirical correlation between slow wind and proximity to coronal-hole boundaries.

Core claim

The central object is the generalized Elsasser equation (Eq. 18) for Alfvénic fluctuations in an arbitrary background field. Its reflection term decomposes (Eq. 27) into the standard expansion-driven reflection proportional to the parallel Alfvén-speed gradient, plus a symmetric-traceless squashing tensor S that captures area-preserving distortions of the flux surface. This S term is absent in all prior flux-tube models, which assume axisymmetric expansion. The paper shows that |S| can rival or exceed the standard reflection coefficient even in a smooth analytic solar-minimum field, and that compressive coupling via curvature and effective gravity introduces heating channels with inverse-dam

What carries the argument

The derivation uses a multiscale expansion of the compressible MHD equations with the RMHD ordering (k_∥/k_⊥ ~ δB/B ~ ϵ ≪ 1), introducing a fast time t for wave dynamics and a slow time τ ~ ϵ⁻³ for transport. At O(ϵ) one obtains equilibrium force balance; at O(ϵ²) the fluctuation equations (generalized RMHD); at O(ϵ³) transport equations for the slow evolution of density, momentum, magnetic field, and thermal energy, driven by quadratic fluctuation correlations. A global energy conservation law ties the fluctuation free energy to background sources Y⊥ (Eq. 33) and parallel wave-energy fluxes. The phenomenology (§III) closes the system by slaving the secondary fluctuations (z⁻, slow modes,熵)

Load-bearing premise

The heating-rate estimates all depend on a 'slaved-field' closure: secondary fluctuations (backward Alfvén waves, slow modes, density perturbations) are assumed to sit in quasi-steady balance between linear driving by the outward wave and nonlinear damping at a mixing rate set by the outer-scale turbulence. If slow waves propagate away before being damped, or if the imbalanced cascade is blocked by kinetic effects such as the helicity barrier, these estimates lose their basis

What would settle it

A direct numerical simulation of multiscale RMHD in a squashed, curved flux tube with realistic solar parameters, measuring the heating rate, would falsify the slaved-field phenomenology if the compressive fluctuations fail to reach quasi-steady balance with the outward Alfvénic driver, or if the net heating from curvature/gravity channels is subdominant to expansion-driven reflection by a large factor despite comparable geometric coefficients.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If squashing-driven reflection dominates in structured regions, heating profiles inferred from expansion-only models systematically underestimate low-altitude dissipation near coronal-hole boundaries, potentially reducing the need for ad hoc reconnection-based heating in those regions.
  • The cross-field mass and composition transport channel provides a continuous, turbulence-mediated mechanism for loading slow-wind plasma with closed-field compositional signatures, complementary to intermittent interchange reconnection.
  • The M_A² scaling of the stream-dissipation (ACR) channel predicts that cross-field shear is preferentially dissipated beyond the Alfvén radius, offering a specific mechanism for the observed erosion of stream structure in the young solar wind.
  • The closed transport equations could be evolved self-consistently as a global, geometry-aware wind model, replacing phenomenological turbulence prescriptions with terms derived from a single expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the slaved-field closure holds, the theory predicts that heating in structured regions should correlate more strongly with the squashing factor Q and transverse gradient scales than with the expansion factor alone—testable by comparing heating proxies (line widths, density fluctuations) with Q-maps from PFSS extrapolations.
  • The ACR/DCF cancellation in stably stratified regions suggests that the net heating from gravity-mediated compressive coupling depends sensitively on the sign of the entropy gradient; this could be tested by comparing heating rates in isothermal vs. super-adiabatically stratified coronal structures.
  • The absence of turbulent magnetic resistivity (E ∥ = 0 at O(ϵ⁴)) implies that magnetic flux surfaces are conserved under the turbulence—only advected—which constrains how rapidly open-closed boundaries can diffuse and may conflict with models that invoke rapid turbulent reconnection-diffusion at streamer boundaries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 9 minor

Summary. This paper develops a multiscale reduced-MHD (RMHD) transport theory for turbulence in an arbitrary background magnetic geometry, retaining squashing factors, transverse gradients, curvature, and gravity at the same formal order as standard expansion-driven Alfvénic reflection. The core derivation (App. A) proceeds via a controlled asymptotic expansion of the compressible MHD equations, yielding generalized Elsasser equations (18) for fluctuations and transport-scale evolution equations (36–39) for the background. The fluctuation free-energy conservation law (31) is derived independently from both the second-order fluctuation system and the third-order transport system, providing a stringent internal consistency check. The theory is then developed into a slaved-field phenomenology (§III) that estimates heating rates and cross-field fluxes, and applied to a simplified solar-minimum corona (§IV) to argue that geometry-driven channels—Q-reflection, compressive coupling via curvature/gravity (DCF/CCR), and Alfvén-catalyzed relaxation (ACR)—can dominate over standard reflection-driven turbulence in structured regions, with implications for the fast/slow wind dichotomy and cross-field mass/composition transport.

Significance. The paper makes a substantial theoretical contribution by unifying multiple geometric effects—expansion, squashing, curvature, gravity, and transverse gradients—within a single energy-consistent multiscale framework. The decomposition of the Alfvénic reflection term into expansion, squashing (S), and twist (A) components (§II B 7, Eq. 26–27) is a clean and novel result with clear physical content. The derivation is parameter-free in its core: no constants are fitted to data, and the energy conservation law is reproduced from two independent routes. The identification of Q-reflection as a heating channel that can operate where parallel Alfvén-speed gradients vanish (Fig. 6) is a falsifiable prediction directly testable against coronal field extrapolations. The cross-field transport predictions (§III F, §IV E)—including the recovery of the turbulent pinch ρ ∝ B² and its generalization to field-aligned flows—are noteworthy. The framework's broader applicability to fusion, accretion, and magnetospheric plasmas is credibly argued. These strengths justify publication in a serious journal subject to resolution of the issues below.

major comments (2)
  1. §III E 1 and §IV C: The DCF/ACR cancellation is explicitly demonstrated only for the g⊥_eff-mediated terms (the F_ρ · g⊥_eff example). The paper states 'this type of cancellation occurs only in very specific cases' but does not verify this claim for the curvature-mediated terms (κ-proportional), which are the channels actually estimated in §IV C (Fig. 8, bottom panel). Since K^damp_DCF and K^damp_ACR share the same forcing vectors F_u, F_B but with different sign structures and different prefactors (ccomp = 2U/vA vs. 2v²_S/v²_A), partial cancellation between curvature-mediated DCF and ACR could reduce the net heating well below the Q_DCF + Q_CCR ≈ 2Q_DCF estimate (Eq. 77) used for the §IV comparisons. This is load-bearing because Fig. 8 is the primary quantitative evidence that compressive channels can compete with RDT. The authors should either (a) show explicitly that curvature-mediate
  2. §III (introductory paragraph): The paper states 'we treat each effect in isolation, thus implicitly assuming that effects do not interact with each other' and that this 'is robust when one effect dominates over others.' However, in structured regions where the novel effects are claimed to be important, the forcing vectors F_u, F_B, F_ρ (Eq. 46) contain multiple comparable terms (e.g., κ(M_A+1), K⊥_B, K⊥_U M_A). The treatment of each in isolation is then not obviously self-consistent. This matters because the §IV estimates (Figs. 8–9) use individual F components to compute critical thresholds, but if multiple forcing terms are simultaneously large, the slaved amplitudes and resulting heating rates are not simply additive. The authors should clarify the regime of validity more precisely, or at minimum note that the §IV thresholds are lower bounds on the required structure when multiple cou
minor comments (9)
  1. §II B 7, Eq. (26): The decomposition of (∇b̂)⊥ into isotropic, symmetric-traceless (S), and antisymmetric (A) parts is standard, but the claim that A 'does not contribute at RMHD order' is proven by a brief argument about taking the curl. A one-sentence statement of the proof in the main text (rather than deferring to the potential formulation) would help readers.
  2. §III B, Eq. (54): The heating rate Q^exp_A is stated to be independent of l⊥, which is a notable and somewhat counterintuitive result. A brief physical explanation of why smaller l⊥ increases the damping rate but decreases z− in the same proportion would improve clarity.
  3. §III C, Eq. (60) and subsequent discussion: The relation dQ/dℓ = 2 Tr(J̃^T S J̃) and the approximation K^∥_Q/2 ≈ |S| are central to linking the squashing factor Q to the reflection rate. The subtlety about rotation of the squashing plane (§III C d) is important but dense; a small schematic figure showing how J̃ misaligns with the eigenframe of S would help the reader.
  4. §IV A, Eq. (98): The wind-speed fit contains several parameters (v∞, R1, w_cusp, R_out) whose dependence on v∞ is stated to be linear but whose physical motivation is not given. A brief justification or reference to the ZEPHYR solutions being fitted would help.
  5. Figure 3: The six-panel figure illustrating geometrical effects is informative but the labels (i)–(vi) do not clearly map to the equation terms. Adding the specific equation number and term (e.g., 'Eq. 18, 3rd line') to each panel caption would improve usability.
  6. Figure 5, right panel: The β curves are shown beyond ℓ ≈ 10 R⊙ with lighter shading to indicate the isothermal assumption breaks down, but the figure is still used for estimates. A clearer statement of which quantities are reliable at which altitudes would help.
  7. §II D (iii): The helicity barrier is mentioned as a limitation but the discussion is brief. Given that the imbalanced cascade (z+ ≫ z−) is central to the entire slaved-field phenomenology, a slightly more detailed discussion of how the helicity barrier would affect the specific closures in §III would strengthen this section.
  8. Table I: The entry for K⊥_G defines it as ∇⊥ ln G, but the perpendicular gradient operator is defined several paragraphs later. A forward reference or reordering would help.
  9. App. B is referenced multiple times in §II E as containing the resummed system suitable for computational evolution, but the content is not summarized in the main text. A brief statement of what the resummation entails (promoting O(ε³) terms into O(ε) equilibria) in the main text would reduce the need to consult the appendix for the key claim about time-evolvable transport equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the core derivation is a parameter-free asymptotic expansion of MHD, and phenomenological closures use stated assumptions rather than fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain proceeds as follows: (1) Start from compressible MHD (Eqs. 1–5). (2) Apply the RMHD multiscale ordering (Eq. 9) with scale separation and multiple-time-scale analysis (Eq. 7). (3) At O(ε), obtain equilibrium relations (Eqs. 10–14). (4) At O(ε²), derive generalized Elsasser equations (18) and compressive equations (22–24) by direct projection of the fluctuating MHD equations. (5) At O(ε³), derive transport equations (36–39) from the conservative form of MHD. (6) Develop phenomenological closures (§III) using the standard mixing-rate estimate ω_nl ~ z+/l⊥ (attributed to Dmitruk et al. [66], not self-cited). (7) Apply to a prescribed background (§IV) for order-of-magnitude estimates. None of these steps reduce to circularity. The key reflection decomposition (Eq. 27) follows from the mathematical identity (26) for the perpendicular part of ∇b̂, which is a standard tensor decomposition, not a definition that presupposes the result. The energy conservation law (31) is derived from the O(ε²) fluctuation equations, while the transport equations (36–39) are derived independently from the O(ε³) expansion of conservative MHD; their agreement is explicitly presented as a consistency check (‘This is a stringent internal consistency check on the expansion’), which is standard practice in multiscale asymptotics, not circular reasoning. The phenomenological closures introduce η_turb = z+l⊥/4 and χ_A = 1 as stated assumptions (not fitted parameters), and the paper notes that reducing χ_A increases the relative importance of new channels, making estimates conservative. The empirical estimates in §IV use the Banaszkiewicz et al. [67] field and ZEPHYR wind fits as a fixed background reference, not as fitted data from which predictions are extracted. Self-citations (e.g., Meyrand et al. [86] for cross-helicity phenomenology, Squire et al. [74,75] for large-amplitude orderings) provide context and comparison but are not load-bearing for the core derivation, which is self-contained in App. A starting from MHD. The qualitative claim that the framework ‘provides a physical basis for WSA coronal-hole-boundary corrections’ is an interpretation of scaling relations, not a circular derivation. The only minor concern is that the slaved-field closure (§III A 1) and the DCF/ACR cancellation discussion (§III E 1) involve assumptions whose validity in curved geometry is untested, but these are correctness risks, not circularity — the assumptions are explicitly

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory introduces no new physical entities or postulated objects. All quantities (Elsasser fields, squashing tensor S, forcing vectors F_G, transport velocities V_G) are derived from standard MHD variables via the multiscale expansion. The framework's novelty lies in the derivation structure, not in new physics postulates.

free parameters (4)
  • χ_A = 1
    Critical balance parameter set to unity for all estimates (§IV); stated as a conservative choice since reducing χ_A increases relative importance of new channels.
  • z+ (base amplitude) = ~20 km/s
    Low-coronal Alfvénic amplitude chosen from observational estimates of non-thermal line widths (§IV E); not fitted to heating rates.
  • T (outer-scale period) = ~2 min
    Dominant near-Sun fluctuation period from PSP observations (§IV); sets l∥,0 ≈ 0.17 R⊙.
  • Wind model parameters (v∞, R1, w_cusp, R_out) = various
    Empirical fit parameters to ZEPHYR solutions (Eq. 98); not fitted to the theory's predictions but prescribed background.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption RMHD ordering: k∥/k⊥ ~ δB/B ~ δu/vA ~ ϵ ≪ 1 with U ~ vA ~ cs
    Standard anisotropic MHD ordering (Eq. 9); justified for sub-Alfvénic corona, extended to transonic fluctuations via App. C.
  • domain assumption Quasi-stationary turbulence: no secular growth in fast-time solution
    Multiple-time-scale analysis requires ⟨∂g/∂t⟩_t = 0 (§II A); standard in transport theory but assumes turbulence reaches statistical steady state.
  • ad hoc to paper Slaved-field closure: z−, compressive fluctuations balanced by z+ driving against nonlinear damping at ω_nl ~ z+/l⊥
    §III A 1; all quantitative heating/transport estimates depend on this. Assumes strong turbulence and rapid adjustment.
  • ad hoc to paper Isotropy of z+ around b̂: ⟨z+_i z+_j⟩ = ⟨|z+|²⟩δ_ij/2
    Eq. 48; simplifies correlator estimates. May fail in strongly sheared or structured regions.
  • domain assumption Mean flow aligned with magnetic field: U = U b̂
    §II A; reasonable in sub-Alfvénic corona but breaks down at larger radii where Parker spiral develops.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 68331 in / 2840 out tokens · 307340 ms · 2026-07-10T01:15:02.429853+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Magnetic geometry shapes how turbulence transports and dissipates energy in strongly magnetized plasmas. The solar corona, a maze of open and closed flux tubes with sharp transverse gradients, is a prominent example, yet most wave-turbulence models of coronal heating assume symmetric flux tubes or add geometric effects in ad hoc ways. Here we develop a geometry-complete multiscale transport theory for reduced-magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in an arbitrary background field, retaining squashing (magnetic shear), transverse gradients, curvature, and gravity at the same order as standard expansion-driven reflection, and coupling fast, anisotropic fluctuations to slow background evolution through conservation laws. Applied to the corona, it recovers the standard reflection-driven turbulent cascade in smooth regions such as coronal-hole interiors, but predicts that in structured regions geometry-driven channels can dominate: squashing drives reflection even when parallel Alfv\'en-speed gradients are weak; curvature and non-radial geometry drive compressive heating channels; and waves catalyze the relaxation of velocity shear into heat. The same dynamics drive cross-field transport of mass, composition, momentum, and heat across open-closed interfaces, at rates rivaling the field-parallel supply from the base. These effects bias heating to low altitudes in structured regions, giving a physical basis for the coronal-hole--boundary corrections used in empirical wind-speed predictors. Additionally, the framework's slow-timescale transport equations could be evolved in time, providing a route to a global, geometry-aware model of a structured wave-driven corona and wind. More broadly, the theory provides an energy-consistent account of turbulence, geometry, and transport effects relevant to various astrophysical and terrestrial settings, from magnetospheres and accretion flows to fusion experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08036 by Benjamin D. G. Chandran, Jonathan Squire, Matthew W. Kunz, Romain Meyrand, Toby Adkins, William A. Clarke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic cartoon of the heating and transport [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the expansion and averaging scheme. Fluc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The geometrical effects on propagating fluctuations contained in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of the field-line geometrical decomposition used to understand Alfv´enic reflection ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The coronal-wind model used in this section with representative open flux tubes. Left: meridional view of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of squashing-driven reflection to stan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The “compressive mediators” Θ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The critical perpendicular structure scale for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Estimate of the perpendicular stream lengthscale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Cumulative mass (and composition) loaded onto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Estimate of the effective heating due to cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

238 extracted references · 238 canonical work pages · 90 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Equilibrium and transport in the transonic ordering A complete transport-order derivation is much less clean in the transonic ordering than in the standard ex- pansion. BecauseU∼ςv A andp∼ς 2B2, the sepa- ration between equilibrium and transport is no longer sharply defined: the mean thermal-pressure force, the wave-pressure force associated with|B+B (0)|...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Plane-parallel stratification: buoyancy and Parker limits. A useful first specialization is a plane-parallel equilib- rium, for which U= 0, κ= 0,K ⊥ U = 0.(D8) The perpendicular force balance (D5) then reduces to the local form of magnetohydrostatic balance in a strat- ified atmosphere,g ⊥ eff =g=v 2 AK⊥ B +c 2 sK⊥ p /γ,which is the starting point for bot...

    work page

  3. [3]

    A second useful specialization is a static, curved field with no gravity, U= 0, g ⊥ eff = 0,(D13) intended to describe a local patch of a confinedz-pinch plasma at radiusR

    Curved, shearless field: interchange and kink-like modes. A second useful specialization is a static, curved field with no gravity, U= 0, g ⊥ eff = 0,(D13) intended to describe a local patch of a confinedz-pinch plasma at radiusR. We take the field-line curvature to be constant and inward, κ=−R −1 ˆx,(D14) and identify the parallel wavenumber with the usu...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We take the field to lie in the azimuthal-vertical plane, with dom- inant gradients and curvature in the radial directionR

    Magnetorotational instability A third useful specialization, yielding an instability of a different character, is a rotating, curved-field equilibrium appropriate to a local patch of an accretion disc. We take the field to lie in the azimuthal-vertical plane, with dom- inant gradients and curvature in the radial directionR. The dominant force balance is b...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Localδ fgyrokinetics Many studies of plasma turbulence in magnetic- confinement fusion are conducted within the framework of localδ fgyrokinetics, which describes the evolution of highly-anisotropic, small amplitude fluctuations in the presence of an equilibrium magnetic field. Here, the word ‘local’ refers to the fact that there is an assumed scale separ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    kinetic reduced MHD

    Large-scale ordering While there are obvious similarities between the gy- rokinetic and multiscale RMHD orderings ((E1) and 72 (A10)), additional assumptions are required in order to simplify the gyrokinetic system of equations. We con- sider fluctuations on scales much larger than the Larmor radii of all species, viz., k⊥ρs ≪1,(E10) with frequencies comp...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Recovering the generalized RMHD equations We now derive evolution equations for the perturbed quantities appearing in (E14), from which we can then recover the equations of generalized RMHD derived in §A 4. a. Alfv´ enic fluctuations To obtain the perpendicular momentum equation (A38a), it will be useful to construct the so-called ‘gyroki- netic vorticity...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Recovering the transport equations We now show that the form of the transport equations derived in§A 5 j can be recovered from the standard form of the transport equations adopted in transport theories of gyrokinetics [41–43]. We first briefly introduce the flux-surface average in§E 4 a (in particular, its relation to our average and flux-following time d...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Velli, R

    M. Velli, R. Grappin, and A. Mangeney, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1807 (1989)

    work page 1989

  10. [10]

    Time-dependent force-free pulsar magnetospheres: axisymmetric and oblique rotators

    A. Spitkovsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L51 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0603147 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J.145, 811 (1966)

    work page 1966

  12. [12]

    F. H. Shu, Astron. Astro.33, 55 (1974)

    work page 1974

  13. [13]

    E. J. Weber and J. Davis, Leverett, Astrophys. J.148, 217 (1967)

    work page 1967

  14. [14]

    Mestel, Mon

    L. Mestel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.140, 177 (1968)

    work page 1968

  15. [15]

    E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J.128, 664 (1958)

    work page 1958

  16. [16]

    S. R. Cranmer and A. R. Winebarger, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.57, 157 (2019), arXiv:1811.00461 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    N. M. Viall and J. E. Borovsky, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.125, e26005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    J. A. Klimchuk, Proc. R. Soc. A373, 20140256 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    De Moortel and P

    I. De Moortel and P. Browning, Proc. R. Soc. A373, 20140269 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Reale, Living Rev

    F. Reale, Living Rev. Solar Phys.11, 4 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    S. R. Cranmer, W. H. Matthaeus, B. A. Breech, and J. C. Kasper, Astrophys. J.702, 1604 (2009), arXiv:0907.2650 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J.330, 474 (1988)

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    C. E. DeForest, Astrophys. J.661, 532 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0610178 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Tomczyk, S

    S. Tomczyk, S. W. McIntosh, S. L. Keil, P. G. Judge, T. Schad, D. H. Seeley, and J. Edmondson, Science317, 1192 (2007)

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    L. P. Chitta, H. Peter, E. R. Priest, and S. K. Solanki, Astron. Astro.644, A130 (2020), arXiv:2010.12560 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    C. H. K. Chen, L. Matteini, A. A. Schekochihin, M. L. Stevens, C. S. Salem, B. A. Maruca, M. W. Kunz, and S. D. Bale, Astrophys. J.825, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    D. J. McComas, B. L. Barraclough, H. O. Funsten, J. T. Gosling, E. Santiago-Mu˜ noz, R. M. Skoug, B. E. Gold- stein, M. Neugebauer, P. Riley, and A. Balogh, J. Geo- phys. Res.105, 10419 (2000)

    work page 2000

  28. [28]

    S. R. Cranmer, A. A. van Ballegooijen, and R. J. Edgar, Astrophys. J. Supp.171, 520 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0703333 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    J. V. Hollweg, J. Geophys. Res.91, 4111 (1986)

    work page 1986

  30. [30]

    W. H. Matthaeus, G. P. Zank, S. Oughton, D. J. Mullan, and P. Dmitruk, Astrophys. J. Lett.523, L93 (1999)

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Turbulence in the sub-Alfv\'enic solar wind driven by reflection of low-frequency Alfv\'en waves

    A. Verdini, M. Velli, and E. Buchlin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 700, L39 (2009), arXiv:0905.2618 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    A. A. van Ballegooijen and M. Asgari-Targhi, As- trophys. J.821, 106 (2016), arXiv:1602.06883 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Three-dimensional simulation of the fast solar wind driven by compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    M. Shoda, T. K. Suzuki, M. Asgari-Targhi, and T. Yokoyama, Astrophys. J. Lett.880, L2 (2019), arXiv:1905.11685 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    B. D. G. Chandran and J. C. Perez, J. Plasma Phys.85, 905850409 (2019), arXiv:1908.00880 [physics.space-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Sioulas, M

    N. Sioulas, M. Velli, C. Shi, T. A. Bowen, A. Mal- let, A. Verdini, B. D. G. Chandran, A. Tenerani, J.- B. Dakeyo, S. D. Bale, D. Larson, J. S. Halekas, L. Matteini, V. R´ eville, C. H. K. Chen, O. M. Romeo, M. Liu, R. Livi, A. Rahmati, and P. L. Whittlesey, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.10106 (2025), arXiv:2510.10106 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Y. M. Wang and J. Sheeley, N. R., Astrophys. J.355, 726 (1990)

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    C. N. Arge and V. J. Pizzo, J. Geophys. Res.105, 10465 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    MacNeice, L

    P. MacNeice, L. K. Jian, S. K. Antiochos, C. N. Arge, C. D. Bussy-Virat, M. L. DeRosa, B. V. Jackson, J. A. Linker, Z. Mikic, M. J. Owens, A. J. Ridley, P. Ri- ley, N. Savani, and I. Sokolov, Space Weather16, 1644 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    H. A. Elliott, C. N. Arge, C. J. Henney, M. A. Dayeh, G. Livadiotis, J.-M. Jahn, and C. E. DeForest, Space Weather20, e2021SW002868 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Closed-Field Coronal Heating Driven by Wave Turbulence

    C. Downs, R. Lionello, Z. Miki´ c, J. A. Linker, and M. Velli, Astrophys. J.832, 180 (2016), arXiv:1610.02113 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    R. J. Morton, R. Sharma, E. Tajfirouze, and H. Miriyala, Rev. Modern Plasma Phys.7, 17 (2023), arXiv:2208.05222 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    M. A. Lee and B. Roberts, Astrophys. J.301, 430 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    J. M. Davila, Astrophys. J.317, 514 (1987)

    work page 1987

  44. [44]

    Understanding uniturbulence: self-cascade of MHD waves in the presence of inhomogeneities

    N. Magyar, T. Van Doorsselaere, and M. Goossens, Astrophys. J.882, 50 (2019), arXiv:1907.10408 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    D. J. Southwood and M. A. Saunders, Planet. Space Sci. 33, 127 (1985)

    work page 1985

  46. [46]

    P. L. Similon and R. N. Sudan, Astrophys. J.336, 442 (1989)

    work page 1989

  47. [47]

    Heyvaerts and E

    J. Heyvaerts and E. R. Priest, Astron. Astro.117, 220 (1983)

    work page 1983

  48. [48]

    Coronal heating by MHD waves

    T. Van Doorsselaere, A. K. Srivastava, P. An- tolin, N. Magyar, S. Vasheghani Farahani, H. Tian, D. Kolotkov, L. Ofman, M. Guo, I. Arregui, I. De Moor- tel, and D. Pascoe, Space Sci. Rev.216, 140 (2020), arXiv:2012.01371 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    J. D. Callen, C. C. Hegna, and A. J. Cole, Phys. Plasmas 17, 056113 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Direct multiscale coupling of a transport code to gyrokinetic turbulence codes

    M. Barnes, I. G. Abel, W. Dorland, T. G¨ orler, G. W. Hammett, and F. Jenko, Physics of Plasmas17, 056109 (2010), arXiv:0912.1974 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    I. G. Abel, G. G. Plunk, E. Wang, M. Barnes, S. C. Cow- ley, W. Dorland, and A. A. Schekochihin, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 116201 (2013), arXiv:1209.4782 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Jenko, W

    F. Jenko, W. Dorland, M. Kotschenreuther, and B. N. Rogers, Phys. Plasmas7, 1904 (2000)

    work page 1904

  53. [53]

    Candy, C

    J. Candy, C. Holland, R. E. Waltz, M. R. Fahey, and E. Belli, Phys. Plasmas16, 060704 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    Tractable flux-driven temperature, density, and rotation profile evolution with the quasilinear gyrokinetic transport model QuaLiKiz

    J. Citrin, C. Bourdelle, F. J. Casson, C. Angioni, N. Bo- nanomi, Y. Camenen, X. Garbet, L. Garzotti, T. G¨ orler, O. G¨ urcan, F. Koechl, F. Imbeaux, O. Linder, K. van de Plassche, P. Strand, G. Szepesi, and J. Contribu- tors, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion59, 124005 (2017), arXiv:1708.01224 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    V. S. Titov, G. Hornig, and P. D´ emoulin, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.107, 1164 (2002)

    work page 2002

  56. [56]

    S. K. Antiochos, Z. Miki´ c, V. S. Titov, R. Lionello, and J. A. Linker, Astrophys. J.731, 112 (2011), arXiv:1102.3704 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    G. P. Zank, W. H. Matthaeus, and C. W. Smith, J. Geophys. Res.101, 17093 (1996). 78

    work page 1996

  58. [58]

    Oughton, W

    S. Oughton, W. H. Matthaeus, C. W. Smith, B. Breech, and P. A. Isenberg, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.116, A08105 (2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    Breech, W

    B. Breech, W. H. Matthaeus, J. Minnie, J. W. Bieber, S. Oughton, C. W. Smith, and P. A. Isenberg, J. Geo- phys. Res. Space Phys.113, A08105 (2008)

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    A. V. Usmanov, W. H. Matthaeus, M. L. Goldstein, and R. Chhiber, Astrophys. J.865, 25 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    G. P. Zank, L. Adhikari, P. Hunana, D. Shiota, R. Bruno, and D. Telloni, Astrophys. J.835, 147 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Leer and T

    E. Leer and T. E. Holzer, J. Geophys. Res.85, 4681 (1980)

    work page 1980

  63. [63]

    V. H. Hansteen and E. Leer, J. Geophys. Res.100, 21577 (1995)

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    B. D. G. Chandran, J. Plasma Phys.87, 905870304 (2021), arXiv:2101.04156 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Alfven Wave Solar Model (AWSoM): Coronal Heating

    B. van der Holst, I. V. Sokolov, X. Meng, M. Jin, W. B. Manchester, IV, G. T´ oth, and T. I. Gombosi, Astrophys. J.782, 81 (2014), arXiv:1311.4093 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Miki´ c, C

    Z. Miki´ c, C. Downs, J. A. Linker, R. M. Caplan, D. H. Mackay, L. A. Upton, P. Riley, R. Lionello, T. T¨ or¨ ok, V. S. Titov, J. Wijaya, M. Druckm¨ uller, J. M. Pasachoff, and W. Carlos, Nature Astron.2, 913 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    M. J. Owens, C. N. Arge, H. E. Spence, and A. Pem- broke, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.110, A12105 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    I. V. Sokolov, B. v. d. Holst, W. B. Manchester, D. C. Su Ozturk, J. Szente, A. Taktakishvili, G. T´ oth, M. Jin, and T. I. Gombosi, Astrophys. J.908, 172 (2021), arXiv:1609.04379 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Parenti, V

    S. Parenti, V. R´ eville, A. S. Brun, R. F. Pinto, F. Auch` ere, E. Buchlin, B. Perri, and A. Strugarek, Astrophys. J.929, 75 (2022), arXiv:2203.10876 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Flux ropes and dynamics of the heliospheric current sheet

    V. R´ eville, N. Fargette, A. P. Rouillard, B. Lavraud, M. Velli, A. Strugarek, S. Parenti, A. S. Brun, C. Shi, A. Kouloumvakos, N. Poirier, R. F. Pinto, P. Louarn, A. Fedorov, C. J. Owen, V. G´ enot, T. S. Horbury, R. Laker, H. O’Brien, V. Angelini, E. Fauchon-Jones, and J. C. Kasper, Astron. Astro.659, A110 (2022), arXiv:2112.07445 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Large-scale Structure and Turbulence Transport in the Inner Solar Wind -- Comparison of Parker Solar Probe's First Five Orbits with a Global 3D Reynolds-averaged MHD Model

    R. Chhiber, A. V. Usmanov, W. H. Matthaeus, and M. L. Goldstein, Astrophys. J.923, 89 (2021), arXiv:2107.11657 [physics.space-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Integrated modelling and multiscale gyrokinetic validation study of ETG turbulence in a JET hybrid H-mode scenario

    J. Citrin, S. Maeyama, C. Angioni, N. Bonanomi, C. Bourdelle, F. J. Casson, E. Fable, T. G¨ orler, P. Man- tica, A. Mariani, M. Sertoli, G. Staebler, T. Watan- abe, and JET Contributors, Nuclear Fusion62, 086025 (2022), arXiv:2209.09683 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Energy partition between Alfv\'enic and compressive fluctuations in magnetorotational turbulence with near-azimuthal mean magnetic field

    Y. Kawazura, A. A. Schekochihin, M. Barnes, W. Dor- land, and S. A. Balbus, J. Plasma Phys.88, 905880311 (2022), arXiv:2110.12434 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Coronal heating distribution due to low-frequency wave-driven turbulence

    P. Dmitruk, W. H. Matthaeus, L. J. Milano, S. Oughton, G. P. Zank, and D. J. Mullan, Astrophys. J.575, 571 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204347 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  75. [75]

    Banaszkiewicz, W

    M. Banaszkiewicz, W. I. Axford, and J. F. McKenzie, Astron. Astro.337, 940 (1998)

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    E. A. Frieman and L. Chen, Phys. Fluids25, 502 (1982)

    work page 1982

  77. [77]

    A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, W. Dorland, G. W. Hammett, G. G. Howes, E. Quataert, and T. Tatsuno, Astrophys. J. Supp.182, 310 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    B. D. G. Chandran and J. V. Hollweg, Astrophys. J. 707, 1659 (2009), arXiv:0911.1068 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  79. [79]

    B.-B. Wang, G. P. Zank, L. Adhikari, and L.-L. Zhao, Astrophys. J.928, 176 (2022), arXiv:2111.11096 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    S. A. Jacques, Astrophys. J.226, 632 (1978)

    work page 1978

Showing first 80 references.