Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

LEEVLA shows that robots map vision and language to actions more reliably when training forces attention onto instruction-relevant changing regions and models how those latent features evolve as structured flows.

2026-07-10 11:44 UTC pith:UBCAVVEY

load-bearing objection Solid training-only VLA recipe with real gains; the 'both crucial' claim is only half-isolated by the ablations. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08182 v1 pith:UBCAVVEY submitted 2026-07-09 cs.CV cs.AI

LEEVLA: Seeing What Matters in Latent Environment Evolution for Vision-Language-Action

Qi Lyu , Baicheng Liu , Xudong Wang , Jiahua Dong , Lianqing Liu , Zhi Han This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords vision-language-actionlatent environment evolutiondrift-guided dynamic prioritizationstructured feature flowprototype-to-peripherymutual-neighborhood contrastrobot manipulationfuture feature prediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Most vision-language-action systems treat every visual patch the same and reason only over human-chosen intermediate cues such as subgoals or depth maps. That both dilutes supervision on what actually drives the task and shrinks the search for unknown but useful factors. LEEVLA instead trains the policy to answer two questions in latent space: where to attend, and how those attended features should evolve. Drift-guided dynamic prioritization weights patches by how much they change and whether their language relevance is rising; structured feature-flow generation then predicts future features from cluster prototypes outward while a mutual-neighborhood contrast keeps local topology consistent. The result is higher success on long-horizon manipulation benchmarks and real robots, without extra cost at test time. A sympathetic reader cares because the method claims that scalable robot control comes from teaching latent world dynamics rather than from ever-more-handcrafted intermediate modalities.

Core claim

The paper claims that explicit task-evidence guidance and structured latent reasoning are both necessary for scalable vision-language-action models. By combining drift-guided dynamic prioritization (where to attend) with structured feature-flow generation via prototype-to-periphery prediction and mutual-neighborhood contrast (how latent states evolve), LEEVLA consistently outperforms prior VLA methods on LIBERO, CALVIN, and real-world manipulation while leaving the inference token stream unchanged.

What carries the argument

The “where–how” training pair: drift-guided dynamic prioritization (DGDP = dynamic position prioritization × semantic drift guidance) that reweights patches by temporal change and rising instruction relevance, plus structured feature flow generation (SFFG = prototype-to-periphery forecasting + mutual-neighborhood contrastive loss) that models ordered latent evolution while preserving reciprocal neighborhood topology.

Load-bearing premise

The pretrained visual features already pack enough mixed semantic, appearance and geometric information that measuring patch change plus language-similarity drift, then clustering and predicting prototype-to-periphery, can surface the factors that actually cause successful actions without any human-chosen intermediate modalities.

What would settle it

Train an otherwise identical model that keeps DGDP and SFFG but replaces the pretrained visual backbone with randomly initialized or heavily degraded features; if success rates on LIBERO Long and the real-world drawer/button tasks collapse to baseline levels, the claim that latent evolution alone supplies the missing task evidence is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. LEEVLA is a vision-language-action architecture that, during training only, steers supervision toward task-critical visual evidence and models structured latent environment evolution. Drift-guided dynamic prioritization (DGDP = DPP + SDG) reweights patches by cosine feature change between t and t+T and by instruction-relevant semantic drift; structured feature flow generation (SFFG) then predicts future features via prototype-to-periphery (P2P) ordering within clusters and a mutual-neighborhood contrastive (MC) loss on reciprocal second-order neighbors. The total objective combines L1 action regression with P2P and MC losses. On LIBERO (mini and large) and CALVIN ABC→D the method reports state-of-the-art or competitive success rates versus recent VLAs, with progressive component ablations on LIBERO-Goal (94.8% → 97.0%) and a small real-world UR5 study versus OpenVLA. Inference cost is unchanged relative to the OpenVLA-OFT-style backbone.

Significance. If the gains are truly attributable to the proposed “where–how” machinery rather than to generic action-conditioned future-feature supervision, the work would offer a practical training recipe for VLAs that avoids human-selected intermediate modalities (depth, subgoals, segmentation) while keeping inference memory and latency fixed. Competitive results at both 0.5B and 7B scales, a clean train-only design, and a public code link are concrete strengths. The contribution is primarily empirical and systems-oriented: it does not introduce a new theoretical guarantee, but it does provide a falsifiable training framework and ablations that can be stress-tested by the community.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.4, Table 5] Central claim vs. ablation design (§5.4, Table 5; abstract and §7). The paper asserts that “explicit task-evidence guidance and structured latent reasoning are both crucial.” Table 5 only adds P2P, MC, DPP, and SDG on top of a no-auxiliary baseline (94.8% → 97.0% on LIBERO-Goal). It does not include a matched control that keeps future-feature prediction but uses uniform weights (β_i = 1), raster/flat token order (no P2P reordering), and ordinary InfoNCE without mutual-neighborhood filtering. Without that control, the reported gains are consistent with any action-conditioned latent foresight signal, not specifically with DGDP/SFFG. A single additional row (or small table) with this matched foresight baseline is load-bearing for the abstract’s causal claim and should be added on at least LIBERO-Goal (and ideally one other suite).
  2. [§5.4 vs Table 5] Inconsistency between prose and table for the full model on the ablation suite. §5.4 states that “incorporating the SDG leads to the best performance of 96.6%,” while Table 5’s final row reports 97.0% average success (and per-instruction numbers that average to 97.0). The same section earlier matches the table for the DPP-only step (96.3%). Please reconcile the number and, if 96.6% was from a different seed or checkpoint, report mean ± std over the same three seeds used elsewhere so the ablation is comparable to Table 2.
  3. [§4.2, Eq. (6)] Specification of the clustering operator used for P2P (§4.2, Eq. 6). The method depends on joint multi-view clustering F([f^p_{t+T}; f^w_{t+T}]) and the number of clusters L, yet the main text does not state which algorithm is used (k-means? spherical? online?), how L is chosen, or whether clustering is recomputed every step from ground-truth future features only. Because P2P ordering and the subsequent MC graph are defined on these clusters, reproducibility and the claim of “structured” evolution require an explicit statement (or a pointer to a fully specified supplementary recipe) and a brief sensitivity check on L.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Tables 6–7] Table 6 (reorder vs no-reorder under Baseline+P2P only) shows a +0.5 point gain; Table 7 (α vs no-α) shows +1.2 points. These are useful but small and reported only on LIBERO-Goal. A sentence clarifying that they are single-suite, single-seed (or multi-seed) would help readers weight them.
  2. [§5.3, Table 3] Real-world evaluation (Table 3, Fig. 5) uses three tasks × 20 trials and only OpenVLA as baseline. The gap is large, but the setup is too narrow to support strong generalization claims; consider adding one stronger baseline (e.g., OpenVLA-OFT) or reporting confidence intervals.
  3. [§4.1, Eqs. (1)–(5)] Notation: θ_i is used both for dynamism score (Eq. 1) and earlier for a generic parameter in the figure caption; β_i is prioritization weight while β sometimes appears in other VLA literature as a policy parameter. A short notation table would reduce confusion.
  4. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 weight visualizations are informative but lack a colorbar scale and a quantitative check (e.g., fraction of mass on gripper/object vs background). Adding either would make the “where to attend” story more concrete.
  5. [§2.2] Related work on world models and token selection (OTTER, Compressor-VLA) is cited; a one-sentence contrast with pure video world models that also train action policies (e.g., whether any of them already use latent topology losses) would sharpen novelty.
  6. [Abstract, §5.2] Minor typos / polish: “LatentEnvironmentEvolution” spacing in the abstract; “Reasoningcolumn” in §5.2; arXiv-style “CoRL’2025” / “RSS’2025” year labels should be checked against actual venue years before camera-ready.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical VLA systems paper whose losses and prioritization weights are data-driven auxiliaries, not self-defining of the reported success rates.

full rationale

LEEVLA is an architecture-and-training paper, not a first-principles derivation. DGDP weights (Eqs. 1–5) are computed from observed cosine feature change between t and t+T and from language–patch similarity; SFFG (Eqs. 6–10) is a reordered cosine forecasting loss plus mutual-neighborhood InfoNCE. The training objective (Eq. 12) is a weighted sum of L1 action regression, P2P, and MC. Reported metrics are independent task success rates on LIBERO, CALVIN, and real-world trials. Nothing in the equations forces those success rates by construction, renames a fitted constant as a prediction, or rests on a load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the authors’ prior work. Self-citations ([9], [15], [31]) are background surveys or related systems and are not used to forbid alternatives or to define the central result. Ablation incompleteness (whether any future-feature loss would suffice) is an experimental-design concern, not circularity. Score 0 is therefore the correct finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central performance claim rests on standard VLA scaffolding plus several modeling choices and free hyperparameters that control prioritization strength, neighborhood construction, and loss balance. No new physical entities are postulated; the invented pieces are algorithmic modules whose value is measured only by downstream success rates.

free parameters (5)
  • semantic-drift temperature τ and clip bound δ
    Control the strength and range of instruction-relevance drift before normalization into ω; chosen by hand and affect β weights.
  • global modulation factor α
    Fixed to 1 in the paper; balances uniform attention against prioritization weights β in the P2P loss.
  • first- and second-order neighborhood sizes K=10, M=5
    Define the mutual-neighborhood positive set for the MC loss; fixed without extensive sensitivity analysis in the main text.
  • MC temperature τ_c and loss weights λ1, λ2, λ3
    Balance action L1, P2P, and MC terms; standard free hyperparameters of multi-loss training.
  • number of clusters L and clustering operator F
    Determine prototype-to-periphery ordering; details partly deferred, yet they structure the entire SFFG loss.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Pretrained DINOv2/SigLIP patch features already embed entangled semantic, appearance, and geometric information sufficient for both known and unknown task factors.
    Stated in §1 as justification for latent-space reasoning over human-selected modalities.
  • ad hoc to paper Cosine dissimilarity between t and t+T features is a valid dynamism score for task-critical regions.
    Eq. (1) defines θ_i this way; no independent validation that high θ always equals causal relevance.
  • domain assumption Mutual (reciprocal) neighbors in feature space are high-confidence semantic positives under noisy robot demonstration clustering.
    Used to construct G+ in Eq. (9); analogous to passive discriminant analysis but not proven for this domain.
  • domain assumption Future-feature prediction as training-only auxiliary supervision improves the action policy without changing inference cost or token stream.
    Core design claim of §4 and related-work contrast with video world models.
invented entities (3)
  • Drift-guided dynamic prioritization (DGDP = DPP + SDG) weights β no independent evidence
    purpose: Automatically reweight patches so supervision concentrates on dynamic, instruction-aligned regions.
    Defined by Eqs. (1)–(5); value is measured only by ablation success rates, no external falsifiable prediction.
  • Prototype-to-periphery (P2P) ordered feature flow no independent evidence
    purpose: Preserve local semantic structure when predicting future latent patches.
    Introduced in §4.2 via clustering and distance-to-centroid sorting; algorithmic construct without independent physical meaning.
  • Mutual-neighborhood contrastive (MC) loss on second-order reciprocal neighbors no independent evidence
    purpose: Filter asymmetric/spurious links and keep latent topology consistent.
    Eqs. (9)–(10); new combination for this VLA setting, validated only by the same success-rate tables.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21904 in / 3302 out tokens · 39654 ms · 2026-07-10T11:44:46.121004+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) models aim to map multimodal inputs to robot actions. However, most existing approaches struggle to cover complex dynamic scenarios due to treating all visual tokens uniformly and reasoning with human-selected factors, which lack mechanisms to emphasize task-critical evidence and ignore underlying factors. To address this issue, we propose LEEVLA, a VLA architecture for seeing what matters in Latent Environment Evolution that explicitly guides the model toward informative regions while preserving the structured evolution of latent world representations. To identify salient and instruction-relevant regions, we introduce drift-guided dynamic prioritization (DGDP), which combines dynamic position prioritization (DPP) with semantic drift guidance (SDG) to guide the VLA agent where to attend during training. On top of this, we introduce structured feature flow generation (SFFG), which models how these prioritized features should evolve in latent space via prototype-to-periphery (P2P) prediction, and a mutual-neighborhood contrastive (MC) loss to maintain topological consistency among neighborhoods. Together, DGDP and SFFG form a task-aware "where-how" training framework. Extensive experiments on VLA benchmarks show that LEEVLA consistently outperforms prior methods, confirming that explicit task-evidence guidance and structured latent reasoning are both crucial for scalable VLA. Our code is available at https://github.com/LyuQi127/LEEVLA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08182 by Baicheng Liu, Jiahua Dong, Lianqing Liu, Qi Lyu, Xudong Wang, Zhi Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between our method and prior methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of our LEEVLA. The Structured Feature Flow Generation is composed of Prototype-to-Periphery (P2P) mechanism and a Mutual-neighborhood Contrastive (MC) Loss as shown in the pink panel. A Future Feature Decoder predicts features at time step t + T within the target latent space. We impose a P2P forecasting loss to model structured state evolution. For each feature at t + T, we build a second-order k… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of Weight Visualization. (a): Visualization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The qualitative results of LEEVLA in real-world en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wrist-View Image Clustering Visualization Results. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    How learning by re- construction produces uninformative features for perception

    Randall Balestriero and Yann LeCun. How learning by re- construction produces uninformative features for perception. InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Ma- chine Learning. JMLR.org, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Minivla: A better vla with a smaller footprint, 2024

    Suneel Belkhale and Dorsa Sadigh. Minivla: A better vla with a smaller footprint, 2024. 6

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael R. Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsch, Lucy Xi- aoyang Shi, Laura Smith, James Tanner, Quan Vuong, Anna Walling, Haohuan Wang, and Ury Zhi...

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Genie: Generative Interactive Environments

    Jake Bruce, Stephanie Zhai, Igor Mordatch, et al. Ge- nie: Generative interactive environments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15391, 2024. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task-centric latent ac- tions.Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS),

    Qingwen Bu, Yanting Yang, Jisong Cai, Shenyuan Gao, Guanghui Ren, Maoqing Yao, Ping Luo, and Hongyang Li. Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task-centric latent ac- tions.Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS),

    work page

  6. [6]

    What to learn, and how: Toward effective learning from rationales

    Samuel Carton, Surya Kanoria, and Chenhao Tan. What to learn, and how: Toward effective learning from rationales. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: ACL 2022, pages 1075–1088, Dublin, Ireland, 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. 2

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    A simple framework for contrastive learn- ing of visual representations

    Ting Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, and Ge- offrey Hinton. A simple framework for contrastive learn- ing of visual representations. InProceedings of the 37th In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 1597–1607, 2020. 5

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Vision language action models in robotic manipulation: A systematic review, 2025

    Muhayy Ud Din, Waseem Akram, Lyes Saad Saoud, Jan Rosell, and Irfan Hussain. Vision language action models in robotic manipulation: A systematic review, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Learning to model the world: A survey of world models in artificial in- telligence.TechRxiv, 2026

    Jiahua Dong, Qi Lyu, Baichen Liu, Xudong Wang, Wenqi Liang, Duzhen Zhang, Jiahang Tu, Hongliu Li, Hanbin Zhao, Henghui Ding, Yulun Zhang, Zhi Han, Nicu Sebe, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan, Mubarak Shah, Philip Torr, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Dacheng Tao. Learning to model the world: A survey of world models in artificial in- telligence.TechRxiv, 2026. 3

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Palm- e: an embodied multimodal language model

    Danny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Corey Lynch, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Brian Ichter, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Quan Vuong, Tianhe Yu, et al. Palm- e: an embodied multimodal language model. InProceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8469–8488, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Ren, Homer Walke, Quan Vuong, Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, and Sergey Levine

    Danny Driess, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Brian Ichter, Lili Yu, Adrian Li-Bell, Karl Pertsch, Allen Z. Ren, Homer Walke, Quan Vuong, Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, and Sergey Levine. Knowledge insulating vision-language-action models: Train fast, run fast, generalize better, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Compressor-vla: Instruction-guided visual token compres- sion for efficient robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18950, 2025

    Juntao Gao, Feiyang Ye, Jing Zhang, and Wenjing Qian. Compressor-vla: Instruction-guided visual token compres- sion for efficient robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18950, 2025. 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Mastering diverse control tasks through world models.Nature, pages 1–7, 2025

    Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, and Timothy Lillicrap. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models.Nature, pages 1–7, 2025. 3 9

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Infinity: Scaling bit- wise autoregressive modeling for high-resolution image syn- thesis, 2024

    Jian Han, Jinlai Liu, Yi Jiang, Bin Yan, Yuqi Zhang, Zehuan Yuan, Bingyue Peng, and Xiaobing Liu. Infinity: Scaling bit- wise autoregressive modeling for high-resolution image syn- thesis, 2024. 5

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Seqwalker: sequential-horizon vision-and-language navigation with hi- erarchical planning

    Zebin Han, Xudong Wang, Baichen Liu, Qi Lyu, Zhenduo Shang, Jiahua Dong, Lianqing Liu, and Zhi Han. Seqwalker: sequential-horizon vision-and-language navigation with hi- erarchical planning. InProceedings of the Fortieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Eighth Con- ference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Sixt...

    work page 2026

  16. [16]

    Peter Hase, Shiyue Zhang, Harry Xie, and Mohit Bansal. Leakage-adjusted simulatability: Can models generate non- trivial explanations of their behavior in natural language? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 4351–4367, Online, 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. 2

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving

    Anthony Hu, Lloyd Russell, Hudson Yeo, Zak Murez, George Fedoseev, Alex Kendall, Jamie Shotton, and Gian- luca Corrado. Gaia-1: A generative world model for au- tonomous driving.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17080, 2023. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations, 2025

    Yucheng Hu, Yanjiang Guo, Pengchao Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Jianke Zhang, Koushil Sreenath, Chaochao Lu, and Jianyu Chen. Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Otter: A vision-language-action model with text-aware visual feature extraction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03734, 2025

    Huang Huang, Fangchen Liu, Letian Fu, Tingfan Wu, Mustafa Mukadam, Jitendra Malik, Ken Goldberg, and Pieter Abbeel. Otter: A vision-language-action model with text-aware visual feature extraction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03734, 2025. 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Stephen James, Zicong Ma, David Rovick Arrojo, and An- drew J. Davison. Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment.IEEE Robotics and Automation Let- ters, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Vima: robot manipulation with multimodal prompts

    Yunfan Jiang, Agrim Gupta, Zichen Zhang, Guanzhi Wang, Yongqiang Dou, Yanjun Chen, Li Fei-Fei, Anima Anandku- mar, Yuke Zhu, and Linxi Fan. Vima: robot manipulation with multimodal prompts. InProceedings of the 40th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR.org, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Token- efficient vlm: High-resolution image understanding via dy- namic region proposal

    Yitong Jiang, Jinwei Gu, Tianfan Xue, Ka Chun Cheung, Pavlo Molchanov, Hongxu Yin, and Sifei Liu. Token- efficient vlm: High-resolution image understanding via dy- namic region proposal. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2025. 3

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Fos- ter, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Thomas Kol- lar, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, Dorsa Sadigh, Sergey Levine, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.0924...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success

    Moo Jin Kim, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Optimizing speed and suc- cess.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19645, 2025. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Segment Anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer White- head, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Ross Girshick. Segment anything.arXiv:2304.02643, 2023. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Cogact: A foundational vision-language- action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation, 2024

    Qixiu Li, Yaobo Liang, Zeyu Wang, Lin Luo, Xi Chen, Mozheng Liao, Fangyun Wei, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu, Yizhong Zhang, Xiaofan Wang, Bei Liu, Jianlong Fu, Jian- min Bao, Dong Chen, Yuanchun Shi, Jiaolong Yang, and Baining Guo. Cogact: A foundational vision-language- action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Latent World Model

    Yingyan Li, Lue Fan, Jiawei He, Yu-Quan Wang, Yuntao Chen, Zhaoxiang Zhang, and Tieniu Tan. Enhancing end- to-end autonomous driving with latent world model.The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Represen- tations (ICLR), abs/2406.08481, 2025. 2, 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Libero: Benchmarking knowl- edge transfer for lifelong robot learning, 2023

    Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qiang Liu, Yuke Zhu, and Peter Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowl- edge transfer for lifelong robot learning, 2023. 1, 2, 6

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Efficient robotic policy learning via latent space backward planning

    Dongxiu Liu, Haoyi Niu, Zhihao Wang, Jinliang Zheng, Yi- nan Zheng, Zhonghong Ou, Jianming Hu, Jianxiong Li, and Xianyuan Zhan. Efficient robotic policy learning via latent space backward planning. InProceedings of the 42nd In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Decoupled weight de- cay regularization

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight de- cay regularization. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Sab-lvlm: Significance-aware binarization for large vision-language models, 2026

    Qi Lyu, Jiahua Dong, Baichen Liu, Xudong Wang, Mingfei Han, Yulun Zhang, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan, Lianqing Liu, and Zhi Han. Sab-lvlm: Significance-aware binarization for large vision-language models, 2026. 1

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Calvin: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manip- ulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3): 7327–7334, 2022

    Oier Mees, Lukas Hermann, Erick Rosete-Beas, and Wol- fram Burgard. Calvin: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manip- ulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3): 7327–7334, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding

    Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. Repre- sentation learning with contrastive predictive coding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748, 2018. 5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models

    Open X-Embodiment Collaboration. Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA), 2024. 1, 6

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Introducing chatgpt.https://openai.com/ index/chatgpt/, 2022

    OpenAI. Introducing chatgpt.https://openai.com/ index/chatgpt/, 2022. Accessed: 2025-10-30. 1

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Maxime Oquab, Timoth ´ee Darcet, Theo Moutakanni, Huy V . V o, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Rus- sell Howes, Po-Yao Huang, Hu Xu, Vasu Sharma, Shang- Wen Li, Wojciech Galuba, Mike Rabbat, Mido Assran, Nico- las Ballas, Gabriel Synnaeve, Ishan Misra, Herve Jegou, Julien Mairal, Patri...

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models

    Karl Pertsch, Kyle Stachowicz, Brian Ichter, Danny Driess, Suraj Nair, Quan Vuong, Oier Mees, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Fast: Efficient action tokenization for vision- language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09747,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junt- ing Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao- Yuan Wu, Ross Girshick, Piotr Doll´ar, and Christoph Feicht- enhofer. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Flower: De- mocratizing generalist robot policies with efficient vision- language-action flow policies

    Moritz Reuss, Hongyi Zhou, Marcel R ¨uhle, ¨Omer Erdinc ¸ Ya˘gmurlu, Fabian Otto, and Rudolf Lioutikov. Flower: De- mocratizing generalist robot policies with efficient vision- language-action flow policies. InProceedings of the 9th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), pages 3736–3761. PMLR, 2025. 6, 7

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    CLIP-Fields: Weakly Supervised Semantic Fields for Robotic Memory

    Nur Muhammad (Mahi) Shafiullah, Chris Paxton, Ler- rel Pinto, Soumith Chintala, and Arthur Szlam. Clip- fields: Weakly supervised semantic fields for robotic mem- ory.Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), abs/2210.05663, 2022. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Memoryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation,

    Hao Shi, Bin Xie, Yingfei Liu, Lin Sun, Fengrong Liu, Tiancai Wang, Erjin Zhou, Haoqiang Fan, Xiangyu Zhang, and Gao Huang. Memoryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation,

    work page

  42. [42]

    Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy

    Octo Model Team. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy. InProceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), Delft, Netherlands, 2024. 1, 2, 6, 7

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Qwen2 Technical Report

    Qwen Team. Qwen2 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671, 2024. Large language and vision- language models from Alibaba Group. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Visual autoregressive modeling: scalable image gen- eration via next-scale prediction

    Keyu Tian, Yi Jiang, Zehuan Yuan, Bingyue Peng, and Liwei Wang. Visual autoregressive modeling: scalable image gen- eration via next-scale prediction. InProceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2024. Curran Associates Inc. 5

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Predictive Inverse Dynamics Models are Scalable Learners for Robotic Manipulation

    Yang Tian, Sizhe Yang, Jia Zeng, Ping Wang, Dahua Lin, Hao Dong, and Jiangmiao Pang. Predictive inverse dynamics models are scalable learners for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15109, 2024. 6, 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine- tuned chat models, 2023

    Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Al- bert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bash- lykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhos- ale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fer- nandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Antho...

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Learning concept credible models for mitigating shortcuts

    Jiaxuan Wang, Sarah Jabbour, Maggie Makar, Michael Sjod- ing, and Jenna Wiens. Learning concept credible models for mitigating shortcuts. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 33343–33356. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022. 1, 2

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Unified vision-language-action model, 2025

    Yuqi Wang, Xinghang Li, Wenxuan Wang, Junbo Zhang, Yingyan Li, Yuntao Chen, Xinlong Wang, and Zhaoxiang Zhang. Unified vision-language-action model, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    What we miss matters: Learning from the overlooked in point cloud transformers

    Yi Wang, Jiaze Wang, Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Donghao Zhou, Guangyong Chen, Anfeng Liu, and Pheng-Ann Heng. What we miss matters: Learning from the overlooked in point cloud transformers. InAdvances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    ivideogpt: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:68082–68119, 2024

    Jialong Wu, Shaofeng Yin, Ningya Feng, Xu He, Dong Li, Jianye Hao, and Mingsheng Long. ivideogpt: Interactive videogpts are scalable world models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:68082–68119, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Ball, Oleh Rybkin, Stephen J

    Yingchen Xu, Jack Parker-Holder, Aldo Pacchiano, Philip J. Ball, Oleh Rybkin, Stephen J. Roberts, Tim Rockt¨aschel, and Edward Grefenstette. Learning general world models in a handful of reward-free deployments. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Red Hook, NY , USA, 2022. Curran Associates Inc. 3

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data

    Lihe Yang, Bingyi Kang, Zilong Huang, Xiaogang Xu, Jiashi Feng, and Hengshuang Zhao. Depth anything: Unleashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Instructvla: Vision-language-action instruction tuning from understanding to manipulation, 2025

    Shuai Yang, Hao Li, Yilun Chen, Bin Wang, Yang Tian, Tai Wang, Hanqing Wang, Feng Zhao, Yiyi Liao, and Jiangmiao Pang. Instructvla: Vision-language-action instruction tuning from understanding to manipulation, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies

    Seonghyeon Ye, Yunhao Ge, Kaiyuan Zheng, Shenyuan Gao, Sihyun Yu, George Kurian, Suneel Indupuru, You Liang Tan, Chuning Zhu, Jiannan Xiang, et al. World action models are zero-shot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023. 2, 3, 6

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Vlabench: A large-scale benchmark for language-conditioned robotics manipulation with long- horizon reasoning tasks

    Shiduo Zhang, Zhe Xu, Peiju Liu, Xiaopeng Yu, Yuan Li, Qinghui Gao, Zhaoye Fei, Zhangyue Yin, Zuxuan Wu, Yu- Gang Jiang, et al. Vlabench: A large-scale benchmark for language-conditioned robotics manipulation with long- horizon reasoning tasks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11142– 11152, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    DreamVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Dreamed with Comprehensive World Knowledge

    Wenyao Zhang, Hongsi Liu, Zekun Qi, Yunan Wang, Xin- qiang Yu, Jiazhao Zhang, Runpei Dong, Jiawei He, He 11 Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, Li Yi, Wenjun Zeng, and Xin Jin. Dreamvla: A vision-language-action model dreamed with comprehensive world knowledge.CoRR, abs/2507.04447,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Cot-vla: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action mod- els

    Qingqing Zhao, Yao Lu, Moo Jin Kim, Zipeng Fu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yecheng Wu, Zhaoshuo Li, Qianli Ma, Song Han, Chelsea Finn, Ankur Handa, Tsung-Yi Lin, Gordon Wet- zstein, Ming-Yu Liu, and Donglai Xiang. Cot-vla: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action mod- els. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern R...

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Universal actions for enhanced embodied foundation models

    Jinliang Zheng, Jianxiong Li, Dongxiu Liu, Yinan Zheng, Zhihao Wang, Zhonghong Ou, Yu Liu, Jingjing Liu, Ya-Qin Zhang, and Xianyuan Zhan. Universal actions for enhanced embodied foundation models. In2025 IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 22508–22519, 2025. 2, 6, 7

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Tracevla: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies,

    Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Shuaiyi Huang, Jianfeng Gao, Hal Daum ´e III, Andrey Kolobov, Furong Huang, and Jianwei Yang. Tracevla: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies,

    work page

  61. [61]

    RoboDreamer: Learning Compositional World Models for Robot Imagination

    Siyuan Zhou, Yilun Du, Jiaben Chen, Yandong Li, Dit-Yan Yeung, and Chuang Gan. Robodreamer: Learning compo- sitional world models for robot imagination.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12377, 2024. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Unified World Models: Coupling Video and Action Diffusion for Pretraining on Large Robotic Datasets

    Chuning Zhu, Raymond Yu, Siyuan Feng, Benjamin Burch- fiel, Paarth Shah, and Abhishek Gupta. Unified world mod- els: Coupling video and action diffusion for pretraining on large robotic datasets.ArXiv, abs/2504.02792, 2025. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control

    Brianna Zitkovich, Tianhe Yu, Sichun Xu, Peng Xu, Ted Xiao, Fei Xia, Jialin Wu, Paul Wohlhart, Stefan Welker, Ayzaan Wahid, et al. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183. PMLR, 2023. 1, 2 12

    work page 2023