Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 90 references

A full-stack pipeline turns noisy egocentric human videos into steerable dexterous-hand policies that follow free-form language across dozens of real-robot tasks.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 17:30 UTC pith:4GEUJCBX

load-bearing objection Solid full-stack engineering paper: real multi-task free-form dexterous results and few-shot long-horizon transfer, with the main residual risk being monocular reconstruction fidelity rather than any internal contradiction. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09701 v1 pith:4GEUJCBX submitted 2026-06-21 cs.RO

EgoSteer: A Full-Stack System Towards Steerable Dexterous Manipulation from Egocentric Videos

Yifan Zhong , Zhang Chen , Tianrui Guan , Fanlian Zeng , Yuyao Ye , Tianjia He , Ka Nam Lui , Jiayi Li
show 8 more authors
Tingrui Zhang Ruilin Yan Xinhao Ji Guangyu Zhao Wenjie Lou Jiayuan Zhang Yuanpei Chen Yaodong Yang
This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords steerable dexterous manipulationvision-language-action modelsegocentric videoshuman-to-robot transferDAgger post-trainingworld-model-enhanced VLAdata curation pipeline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Steerability—doing what a free-form instruction says, with recovery and generalization—has been missing from dexterous-hand robots mainly because large, language-aligned, action-accurate demos are almost impossible to collect on the robot itself. This paper argues that the missing scale can come from in-the-wild egocentric human video if it is systematically cleaned, reconstructed into world-space hand trajectories, and labeled at multiple language granularities. The authors ship that pipeline (EgoSmith), a shared teleoperation-and-correction robot stack, and a world-model-enhanced vision-language-action model (EgoSteer). After pre-training on 9.6K hours of curated human data, modest real-robot post-training, and targeted DAgger corrections, the system reports free-form success across 40+ tasks and few-shot transfer to long-horizon skills such as box folding on two embodiments. A sympathetic reader cares because the work claims a practical route from abundant human video to language-steerable multi-fingered control without collecting thousands of hours on every new robot.

Core claim

Large-scale, carefully curated egocentric human video can supply language-guided manipulation priors that, once grounded with a modest amount of real-robot teleoperation and human-in-the-loop DAgger data in a unified wrist-plus-fingertip action space, produce a steerable dual-dexterous-hand policy that executes free-form instructions across dozens of tasks and few-shot adapts to complex long-horizon skills.

What carries the argument

EgoSmith (pre-filter → DPVO+Any4D metric 4D reconstruction → multi-level language labels → multi-scale post-filter) plus a world-model expert that predicts future DINOv3 features during training only, both feeding a flow-matching action expert with training-time real-time chunking in a shared wrist-pose and fingertip-keypoint space.

Load-bearing premise

That monocular egocentric reconstructions and automatic language labels, after EgoSmith’s filters, are accurate enough in world space and language that they transfer to real robot kinematics with only modest post-training.

What would settle it

Train the same EgoSteer architecture from scratch on the robot data alone (or on unfiltered noisy egocentric data) and show that free-form multi-task success and few-shot long-horizon adaptation collapse to near zero, or that measured world-space hand trajectory error on held-out annotated video rises enough that downstream success falls below the reported baselines.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dexterous-hand systems can gain free-form language following without collecting robot-scale multi-task corpora from scratch.
  • Scaling curated egocentric hours further should continue to improve recovery, instruction following, and action precision on the same post-training budget.
  • The open-sourced pipeline, robot stack, and checkpoints let others reproduce or extend steerable multi-finger control on new dual-arm embodiments.
  • Few-shot adaptation of the same pre-trained priors can unlock long-horizon contact-rich skills that pure imitation learning from limited demos fails on.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If reconstruction noise is the true bottleneck, tighter multi-view or tactile-aligned human capture may yield larger gains than simply adding more monocular hours.
  • The same wrist-plus-fingertip interface could serve as a common pre-training target for other multi-finger hands, reducing embodiment-specific re-labeling.
  • Absent tactile sensing, residual failures on contact-rich wiping and pouring will likely remain even as language following improves.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a full-stack system for steerable dual-dexterous-hand manipulation. EgoSmith curates ~9.6K hours of in-the-wild egocentric video into language-aligned, world-space wrist/fingertip trajectories (pre-filter, DPVO+Any4D 4D estimation, multi-level Qwen labeling, multi-granularity post-filter), claiming 9× throughput and better accuracy than HaWoR. A unified robot stack supports teleoperation, inference, and relative-motion DAgger handover; 187 h of multi-task teleop data are collected. EgoSteer is a Qwen3-VL + DiT flow-matching VLA with a training-only world-model expert that regresses future DINOv3 features, training-time RTC, and a shared SE(3)+fingertip-keypoint action space. After pre-training, post-training, and three DAgger rounds, the policy reaches ~75% average success on 40 free-form tasks (seen/compositional/unseen) and few-shot adapts to long-horizon box folding / cake unboxing on two embodiments at 75+% success, outperforming π0.5, Being-H0.5, DP, IMLE, and from-scratch ablations. Scaling, data-quality, world-model, RTC, and DAgger ablations are reported; code/data/models are promised open-source.

Significance. If the reported real-robot numbers hold under independent reimplementation, the work is a substantial systems contribution: it is one of the first demonstrations that large-scale curated monocular egocentric video can supply language-steerable priors for high-DoF dexterous hands, with data-efficient grounding and few-shot long-horizon transfer across embodiments. Strengths that raise the bar include the open-source commitment, the quantitative 4D-reconstruction benchmark (Table 2), the multi-task free-form evaluation with N=10 trials, the component ablations (scale, noisy data, WM, RTC, DAgger), and the clear failure of strong imitation baselines on the hard long-horizon tasks. The residual risk is hardware- and reconstruction-specific transfer; the paper already lists DoF, tactile, and scale limitations honestly.

major comments (2)
  1. The central transfer premise (§3–§5) rests on monocular EgoSmith reconstructions (DPVO + Any4D metric scaling + HaWoR-style MANO + Qwen labels) producing action-accurate world-space wrist/fingertip trajectories that transfer via the unified SE(3)+keypoint space with only modest robot post-training. Table 2 shows clear gains over HaWoR on annotated subsets, and the scale / noisy-data / few-shot ablations (§6.3–6.5) are consistent with useful priors, but residual reconstruction bias is not quantified on the full 9.6K-hour corpus or against robot kinematics. A short additional analysis (e.g., held-out reconstruction error vs. downstream success, or a controlled noise-injection study beyond the binary “noisy data” ablation) would make the load-bearing claim more falsifiable without changing the empirical results.
  2. §6.1 / Fig. 5 and Table 1 report 75% average success and 75+% few-shot rates under free-form instructions with N=10 trials per task. The evaluation protocol is stronger than many concurrent VLA papers, yet variance, confidence intervals, and exact success criteria (especially for contact-rich and multi-step tasks) are not stated. Adding per-task standard errors or a short protocol appendix would strengthen the central empirical claim without requiring new experiments.
minor comments (5)
  1. Clarify the subjective quality weights w_i ∈ [1,10] and the sampling formula W_i = w_i √n_i (Appendix A.2 / C.2); a short sensitivity check or fixed weights would improve reproducibility.
  2. Fig. 5 packs 40 tasks into a single bar chart; a tabular supplement (already partially present in the appendix) would make per-category and per-task numbers easier to cite.
  3. Notation for the relative action chunk a^{c_t} and the RTC prefix/suffix split (Eq. for L_CFM) is dense; a short expanded definition or diagram would help readers implement training-time RTC.
  4. The VLM co-training mixture (Appendix C.1) is useful but its contribution is not ablated; a one-sentence note on whether it is essential or optional would be helpful.
  5. Minor typos and formatting: “9x” vs “9×”, occasional missing spaces around citations, and inconsistent capitalization of “EgoSteer” / “EgoSmith” in figure captions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical systems paper whose success rates, ablations, and scaling results are measured on held-out real-robot trials rather than derived by construction from fitted inputs.

full rationale

EgoSteer is a full-stack empirical robotics paper. Its load-bearing claims (75% average free-form success across 40+ tasks after EgoSmith pre-training + 187 h robot post-training + DAgger; 75%+ few-shot long-horizon adaptation; component ablations; pre-training scale curves) are evaluated by randomized real-robot trials (N=10 per task) under free-form language, not by algebraic reduction of a fitted constant or self-defined quantity. EgoSmith’s 4D reconstruction (DPVO + Any4D metric scaling + HaWoR-style MANO) is benchmarked against external annotated subsets via RPE/ATE/WA-MPJPE/W-MPJPE (Table 2) and is not used to “predict” those same metrics. The world-model expert regresses future DINOv3 features under an auxiliary MSE loss discarded at inference; the CFM action objective and RTC delay sampling are standard training choices, not uniqueness theorems. Self-citations (HaWoR, Being-H0.5, π0.5, DAgger, etc.) supply components or baselines; none is a load-bearing uniqueness result that forces the reported success rates. No fitted parameter is renamed a prediction of a closely related quantity, and no ansatz is smuggled in as a first-principles derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against its own external benchmarks; residual risk lies in reconstruction-transfer assumptions and hardware replication, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 3 invented entities

As an empirical systems paper the load-bearing content is engineering choices and measured success rates rather than formal axioms. The free parameters are the many thresholds and hyperparameters that define data quality and training; the axioms are standard robotics/ML domain assumptions plus a few paper-specific modeling choices; the invented entities are the named system components whose value is justified only by the reported experiments.

free parameters (5)
  • EgoSmith pre-filter thresholds (optical-flow translation ≤10% image, YOLO conf≥0.3, area [2%,50%], spatial gate, ≥2 hand
    Hand-chosen heuristics that decide which raw video survives; directly control the 9.6K-hour corpus composition.
  • Post-filter IQR multiplier 2.5 and physical ceilings (1.5 m reach, 0.20–0.30 m/frame, 28–41°/frame)
    Dataset-specific and universal cut-offs that discard episodes; alter training distribution.
  • Subjective per-dataset quality weights w_i ∈[1,10] and sampling W_i = w_i √n_i
    Manual scores that re-balance the 12 source datasets during pre-training.
  • Learning rates, freeze/warmup steps, batch sizes, RTC delay distribution U[0,5], CFM Beta schedule, loss weights (1,1,0.
    Standard but numerous training knobs listed in Tables 4,6,10,11 that affect final success rates.
  • Proprioception mask probability 75%, chest-camera drop 50%
    Regularization choices that force multimodal attention; affect instruction following.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption World-space wrist SE(3) + 15-D fingertip keypoints form a transferable action space between human hands and 6-DoF robot hands after a simple palm-length offset.
    Stated in §5 and B.1.2; without it human pre-training cannot ground onto the robot.
  • ad hoc to paper DINOv3 latent features of future frames are a stable, informative target for a training-only world-model expert that improves action accuracy with zero inference cost.
    Core design of §5; ablation in Table 1c supports it but the choice is paper-specific.
  • domain assumption Relative-motion mapping at intervention time yields smooth, high-success (>85%) human-in-the-loop corrections usable for DAgger.
    §4; enables the claimed sample-efficient refinement.
  • standard math Standard flow-matching / DiT / Qwen3-VL training dynamics and CFM loss produce usable continuous action chunks.
    Inherited from cited VLA literature (π0, etc.).
invented entities (3)
  • EgoSmith four-stage curation pipeline (pre-filter + DPVO/Any4D 4D estimation + multi-level Qwen labeling + multi-granularity post-filter) no independent evidence
    purpose: Convert raw monocular egocentric video into language-aligned, metric, world-space hand trajectories at 9× prior throughput.
    Named system component; value rests on Table 2 accuracy and downstream robot success; no independent external validation yet.
  • EgoSteer world-model expert (4-layer Transformer predicting future DINOv3 features, discarded at inference) no independent evidence
    purpose: Improve backbone action imagination and modality alignment without runtime cost.
    Architectural novelty of the paper; supported only by the No-WM ablation.
  • Relative-motion mapping scheme for seamless teleop ↔ policy handover no independent evidence
    purpose: Allow high-frequency DAgger corrections from arbitrary deployment states without state jumps.
    Key enabler of the 8.3-hour DAgger gains; paper-specific control design.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35421 in / 3718 out tokens · 47257 ms · 2026-07-14T17:30:01.146301+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Steerability is a defining capability of generalist robot policies, yet remains largely absent in dexterous-hand systems for lack of large-scale, language-aligned, and action-accurate demonstration data. To address this bottleneck, we present a full-stack system that scales dexterous VLA pre-training from egocentric human videos and enables data-efficient real-robot post-training. It integrates EgoSmith, a data pipeline that curates in-the-wild egocentric videos into 9.6K hours of high-quality pre-training data with 9x higher throughput and better accuracy than prior SOTA; a unified robot stack for teleoperation and human-in-the-loop correction; and EgoSteer, a world-model-enhanced VLA trained on optimized infrastructure. Human-data pre-training equips EgoSteer with language-guided manipulation priors, which are grounded through robot post-training and improved by DAgger refinement. Empirically, EgoSteer robustly executes free-form instructions across 40+ diverse tasks, demonstrating failure recovery, dexterity, and generalization. The pre-trained model also few-shot adapts to complex long-horizon tasks, including box folding, on two embodiments with 75+% success. We open-source the system, data, and model at https://egosteer.github.io/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09701 by Fanlian Zeng, Guangyu Zhao, Jiayi Li, Jiayuan Zhang, Ka Nam Lui, Ruilin Yan, Tianjia He, Tianrui Guan, Tingrui Zhang, Wenjie Lou, Xinhao Ji, Yaodong Yang, Yifan Zhong, Yuanpei Chen, Yuyao Ye, Zhang Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our full-stack system integrates EgoSmith, Robot Stack, and EgoSteer to learn from large-scale egocentric human videos and facilitate data-efficient real-robot post-training, enabling steerable dexterous ma￾nipulation across over 40 tasks alongside few-shot adaptation to complex, long-horizon tasks. 1 Introduction A central goal of general-purpose embodied intelligence is to enable robots to perform divers… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of EgoSmith. Integrating pre-filtering, 4D motion estimation, language labeling, and post￾filtering, EgoSmith efficiently curates in-the-wild egocentric videos into clean and annotated training samples. The fourth stage, post-filtering, performs multi-level quality control on the generated data. First, at the episode level, we compute camera translation distributions to discard outliers, while app… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the Robot Stack. It unifiedly supports teleoperation, policy inference, and human-in￾the-loop correction. A relative motion mapping scheme is employed to facilitate seamless transitions during interventions, and the bottom row illustrates the two robotic embodiments utilized in our experiments. Only these intervention segments are utilized for subsequent training. This design achieves a han￾dov… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of EgoSteer, a world-model-enhanced VLA model for steerable dexterity. A shared Qwen3-VL backbone extracts KV cache representations from multi-modal inputs. The action expert jointly attends to itself and the backbone to generate action chunks via flow-matching, integrating training-time RTC to eliminate execution pauses. The training-only world model expert predicts future DINOv3 features to impr… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Steerable manipulation performance of EgoSteer across 40 tasks spanning 7 categories. It robustly follows free-form language instructions to achieve an overall success rate of 75%, demonstrating generalization. Results. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scaling behavior of pre￾training loss and downstream real￾robot post-training performance. Setup. The EgoSteer models pre-trained on 3K, 6K, and 9.6K hours of egocentric data, alongside a non-pretrained baseline trained from scratch, are post-trained on the real-robot dataset. These models, denoted as EgoSteer-0/3/6/9.6K, are evaluated across 10 tasks. Additionally, the baselines π0.5 [2] and Being￾H0.5 [8… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Curated dataset statistics. (a) Source composition of the 12 egocentric datasets, detailing dura￾tion, percentage, episode count, and per-annotation origin. Checkmarks denote annotations generated by our pipeline, while blank entries indicate natively provided annotations. For FPHA, the checkmark under Hand specifically denotes the additionally annotated second hand. (b)–(d) Task and semantic diversity: wo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Teleoperation dataset statistics. (1) Figure 8a - Figure 8d: Word clouds and top-30 frequency distri￾butions of nouns and verbs in language annotations. (2) Figure 8e: Task duration breakdown by seven manip￾ulation categories (PnP-Easy/Medium/Hard, Non-prehensile, Reorient, Bimanual, Contact-rich). (3) Figure 8f and Figure 8g: Detailed duration statistics for common tasks (56 tasks) and long-tail tasks (13… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Dual-view image sequence and three-level language annotations of a representative trajectory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Representative task examples across seven manipulation categories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Statistical distribution of sam￾ples across VLM co-training datasets. This section first introduces the VLM datasets utilized for co-training with VLA data, i.e. egocentric human videos and real-robot data, to preserve EgoSteer’s vision￾language knowledge and ensure generalization (Sec￾tion C.1). We then present implementation details of EgoSteer (Section C.2). C.1 VLM Co-Training Data To preserve general… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 28 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Haus- man, B. Ichter, S. Jakubczak, T. Jones, L. Ke, S. Levine, A. Li-Bell, M. Mothukuri, S. Nair, K. Pertsch, L. X. Shi, J. Tanner, Q. Vuong, A. Walling, H. Wang, and U. Zhilinsky.π 0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv. o...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Intelligence, K

    P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, M. Y . Galliker, D. Ghosh, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, S. Jakubczak, T. Jones, L. Ke, D. LeBlanc, S. Levine, A. Li-Bell, M. Mothukuri, S. Nair, K. Pertsch, A. Z. Ren, L. X. Shi, L. Smith, J. T. Springenberg, K. Stachowicz, J. Tanner, Q. V...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Intelligence, A

    P. Intelligence, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, K. Black, K. Conley, G. Connors, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, J. DiCarlo, et al.π ∗ 0.6: a vla that learns from experience.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    S. Liu, L. Wu, B. Li, H. Tan, H. Chen, Z. Wang, K. Xu, H. Su, and J. Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffu- sion foundation model for bimanual manipulation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pages 29982–30009, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    S. Liu, B. Li, K. Ma, L. Wu, H. Tan, X. Ouyang, H. Su, and J. Zhu. Rdt2: Exploring the scaling limit of umi data towards zero-shot cross-embodiment generalization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03310, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Zheng, D

    R. Zheng, D. Niu, Y . Xie, J. Wang, M. Xu, Y . Jiang, F. Casta ˜neda, F. Hu, Y . L. Tan, L. Fu, T. Darrell, F. Huang, Y . Zhu, D. Xu, and L. Fan. Egoscale: Scaling dexterous manipulation with diverse egocentric human data, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16710

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    H. Luo, Y . Feng, W. Zhang, S. Zheng, Y . Wang, H. Yuan, J. Liu, C. Xu, Q. Jin, and Z. Lu. Being-h0: Vision-language-action pretraining from large-scale human videos, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15597

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    H. Luo, Y . Wang, W. Zhang, S. Zheng, Z. Xi, C. Xu, H. Xu, H. Yuan, C. Zhang, Y . Wang, Y . Feng, and Z. Lu. Being-h0.5: Scaling human-centric robot learning for cross-embodiment generalization, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12993

    arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    H. Luo, W. Zhang, Y . Feng, S. Zheng, H. Xu, C. Xu, Z. Xi, Y . Fu, and Z. Lu. Being-h0. 7: A latent world-action model from egocentric videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.00078, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    J. Lyu, K. Liu, X. Zhang, H. Liao, Y . Feng, W. Zhu, T. Shen, J. Chen, J. Zhang, Y . Dong, et al. Lda-1b: Scaling latent dynamics action model via universal embodied data ingestion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12215, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    L. Li, Q. Zhang, Y . Luo, S. Yang, R. Wang, F. Han, M. Yu, Z. Gao, N. Xue, X. Zhu, Y . Shen, and Y . Xu. Causal world modeling for robot control.CoRR, abs/2601.21998, January 2026. URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.21998

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.21998 2026

  12. [12]

    W. Wu, F. Lu, Y . Wang, S. Yang, S. Liu, F. Wang, Q. Zhu, H. Sun, Y . Wang, S. Ma, et al. A pragmatic vla foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18692, 2026. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Brohan, N

    A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y . Chebotar, J. Dabis, C. Finn, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Haus- man, A. Herzog, J. Hsu, J. Ibarz, B. Ichter, A. Irpan, T. Jackson, S. Jesmonth, N. J. Joshi, R. Julian, D. Kalashnikov, Y . Kuang, I. Leal, K.-H. Lee, S. Levine, Y . Lu, U. Malla, D. Man- junath, I. Mordatch, O. Nachum, C. Parada, J. Peralta, E. Perez, K. Pertsc...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Zitkovich, T

    B. Zitkovich, T. Yu, S. Xu, P. Xu, T. Xiao, F. Xia, J. Wu, P. Wohlhart, S. Welker, A. Wahid, et al. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Intelligence, B

    P. Intelligence, B. Ai, A. Amin, R. Aniceto, A. Balakrishna, G. Balke, K. Black, G. Bokin- sky, S. Cao, T. Charbonnier, et al.π 0.7: a steerable generalist robotic foundation model with emergent capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15483, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    S. Ye, Y . Ge, K. Zheng, S. Gao, S. Yu, G. Kurian, S. Indupuru, Y . L. Tan, C. Zhu, J. Xi- ang, A. Malik, K. Lee, W. Liang, N. Ranawaka, J. Gu, Y . Xu, G. Wang, F. Hu, A. Narayan, J. Bjorck, J. Wang, G. Kim, D. Niu, R. Zheng, Y . Xie, J. Wu, Q. Wang, R. Julian, D. Xu, Y . Du, Y . Chebotar, S. Reed, J. Kautz, Y . Zhu, L. J. Fan, and J. Jang. World action m...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Hoque, P

    R. Hoque, P. Huang, D. J. Yoon, M. Sivapurapu, and J. Zhang. Egodex: Learning dexterous manipulation from large-scale egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11709, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Punamiya, S

    R. Punamiya, S. Kareer, Z. Liu, J. Citron, R.-Z. Qiu, X. Cai, A. Gavryushin, J. Chen, D. Li- conti, L. Y . Zhu, et al. Egoverse: An egocentric human dataset for robot learning from around the world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07607, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. Deng, C. Ma, and R. A. Potamias. Hawor: World-space hand motion reconstruc- tion from egocentric videos. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 1805–1815, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    S. Ross, G. Gordon, and D. Bagnell. A reduction of imitation learning and structured predic- tion to no-regret online learning. InProceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 627–635. JMLR Workshop and Conference Pro- ceedings, 2011

    2011

  21. [21]

    Sim ´eoni, H

    O. Sim ´eoni, H. V . V o, M. Seitzer, F. Baldassarre, M. Oquab, C. Jose, V . Khalidov, M. Szafraniec, S. Yi, M. Ramamonjisoa, et al. Dinov3.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10104, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Cai, R.-Z

    X. Cai, R.-Z. Qiu, G. Chen, L. Wei, I. Liu, T. Huang, X. Cheng, and X. Wang. In-n-on: Scaling egocentric manipulation with in-the-wild and on-task data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.15704, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Y . Fu, N. Chen, J. Zhao, S. Shan, G. Yao, P. Wang, Z. Wang, and S. Zhang. Metis: Multi-source egocentric training for integrated dexterous vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.17366, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Black, A

    K. Black, A. Z. Ren, M. Equi, and S. Levine. Training-time action conditioning for efficient real-time chunking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05964, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(10-11):1684–1704, 2025. 10

    2025

  26. [26]

    K. Rana, R. Lee, D. Pershouse, and N. Suenderhauf. Imle policy: Fast and sample effi- cient visuomotor policy learning via implicit maximum likelihood estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12371, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Zhong, F

    Y . Zhong, F. Bai, S. Cai, X. Huang, Z. Chen, X. Zhang, Y . Wang, S. Guo, T. Guan, K. N. Lui, Z. Qi, Y . Liang, Y . Chen, and Y . Yang. A survey on vision-language-action models: An action tokenization perspective, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01925

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    O. M. Team, D. Ghosh, H. Walke, K. Pertsch, K. Black, O. Mees, S. Dasari, J. Hejna, T. Kreiman, C. Xu, J. Luo, Y . L. Tan, L. Y . Chen, P. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, T. Xiao, D. Sadigh, C. Finn, and S. Levine. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy, 2024. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.12213

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Foster, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, T. Kollar, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, D. Sadigh, S. Levine, P. Liang, and C. Finn. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09246

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Bjorck, F

    NVIDIA, :, J. Bjorck, F. Casta ˜neda, N. Cherniadev, X. Da, R. Ding, L. J. Fan, Y . Fang, D. Fox, F. Hu, S. Huang, J. Jang, Z. Jiang, J. Kautz, K. Kundalia, L. Lao, Z. Li, Z. Lin, K. Lin, G. Liu, E. Llontop, L. Magne, A. Mandlekar, A. Narayan, S. Nasiriany, S. Reed, Y . L. Tan, G. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Q. Wang, J. Xiang, Y . Xie, Y . Xu, Z. Xu, S. Ye, Z...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Grauman, A

    K. Grauman, A. Westbury, E. Byrne, Z. Chavis, A. Furnari, R. Girdhar, J. Hamburger, H. Jiang, M. Liu, X. Liu, et al. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 18995–19012, 2022

    2022

  32. [32]

    B. AI. Egocentric-10k, 2025. URLhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/builddotai/ Egocentric-10K

    2025

  33. [33]

    X. Wang, T. Kwon, M. Rad, B. Pan, I. Chakraborty, S. Andrist, D. Bohus, A. Feniello, B. Tekin, F. V . Frujeri, et al. Holoassist: an egocentric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assis- tants in the real world. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 20270–20281, 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    X. Zhan, L. Yang, Y . Zhao, K. Mao, H. Xu, Z. Lin, K. Li, and C. Lu. Oakink2: A dataset of bimanual hands-object manipulation in complex task completion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 445–456, 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Y . Liu, H. Yang, X. Si, L. Liu, Z. Li, Y . Zhang, Y . Liu, and L. Yi. Taco: Benchmarking generalizable bimanual tool-action-object understanding. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21740–21751, 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    Banerjee, S

    P. Banerjee, S. Shkodrani, P. Moulon, S. Hampali, S. Han, F. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Fountain, E. Miller, S. Basol, et al. Hot3d: Hand and object tracking in 3d from egocentric multi- view videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7061–7071, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    B. AI. Egocentric-100k, 2025. URLhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/builddotai/ Egocentric-100K

    2025

  38. [38]

    Q. Li, Y . Deng, Y . Liang, L. Luo, L. Zhou, C. Yao, L. Zeng, Z. Feng, H. Liang, S. Xu, et al. Scalable vision-language-action model pretraining for robotic manipulation with real-life hu- man activity videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21571, 2025. 11

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    R. Yang, Q. Yu, Y . Wu, R. Yan, B. Li, A.-C. Cheng, X. Zou, Y . Fang, X. Cheng, R.-Z. Qiu, H. Yin, S. Liu, S. Han, Y . Lu, and X. Wang. Egovla: Learning vision-language-action models from egocentric human videos, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12440

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    J. Luo, C. Xu, J. Wu, and S. Levine. Precise and dexterous robotic manipulation via human- in-the-loop reinforcement learning.Science Robotics, 10(105):eads5033, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    X. Xu, Y . Hou, Z. Liu, and S. Song. Compliant residual dagger: Improving real-world contact- rich manipulation with human corrections.Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 38:139559–139581, 2026

    2026

  42. [42]

    Y . Han, Z. Chen, Y . Zhao, C. Xu, Y . Shao, Y . Peng, Y . Mu, and W. Lian. Dexhil: A human-in- the-loop framework for vision-language-action model post-training in dexterous manipulation,

  43. [43]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09121

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Z. Li, L. Huang, W. Xu, Z. Zhu, N. Lin, X. Ma, X. Sheng, and R. Wen. Hand-in-the-loop: Improving vla policies for dexterous manipulation via seamless hand-arm intervention, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15157

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [46]

    URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [47]

    R. A. Potamias, J. Zhang, J. Deng, and S. Zafeiriou. Wilor: End-to-end 3d hand localization and reconstruction in-the-wild. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 12242–12254, 2025

    2025

  47. [48]

    Teed and J

    Z. Teed and J. Deng. Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:16558–16569, 2021

    2021

  48. [49]

    Z. Teed, L. Lipson, and J. Deng. Deep patch visual odometry.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:39033–39051, 2023

    2023

  49. [50]

    Karhade, N

    J. Karhade, N. Keetha, Y . Zhang, T. Gupta, A. Sharma, S. Scherer, and D. Ramanan. Any4d: Unified feed-forward metric 4d reconstruction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10935, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    Qwen3.5: Towards native multimodal agents, February 2026

    Qwen Team. Qwen3.5: Towards native multimodal agents, February 2026. URLhttps: //qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5

    2026

  51. [52]

    T. Kwon, B. Tekin, J. St ¨uhmer, F. Bogo, and M. Pollefeys. H2o: Two hands manipulating objects for first person interaction recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 10138–10148, 2021

    2021

  52. [53]

    Garcia-Hernando, S

    G. Garcia-Hernando, S. Yuan, S. Baek, and T.-K. Kim. First-person hand action benchmark with rgb-d videos and 3d hand pose annotations. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 409–419, 2018

    2018

  53. [54]

    Damen, H

    D. Damen, H. Doughty, G. M. Farinella, S. Fidler, A. Furnari, E. Kazakos, D. Moltisanti, J. Munro, T. Perrett, W. Price, et al. Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 720–736, 2018

    2018

  54. [55]

    K. Zakka. Mink: Python inverse kinematics based on MuJoCo, Feb. 2026. URLhttps: //github.com/kevinzakka/mink

    2026

  55. [56]

    S. Bai, Y . Cai, R. Chen, K. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Cheng, L. Deng, W. Ding, C. Gao, C. Ge, W. Ge, Z. Guo, Q. Huang, J. Huang, F. Huang, B. Hui, S. Jiang, Z. Li, M. Li, M. Li, K. Li, Z. Lin, J. Lin, X. Liu, J. Liu, C. Liu, Y . Liu, D. Liu, S. Liu, D. Lu, R. Luo, C. Lv, R. Men, L. Meng, X. Ren, X. Ren, S. Song, Y . Sun, J. Tang, J. Tu, J. Wan, P. Wang, P. Wang,...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  57. [58]

    Lipman, R

    Y . Lipman, R. T. Chen, H. Ben-Hamu, M. Nickel, and M. Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. InThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  58. [59]

    Y . Zhao, A. Gu, R. Varma, L. Luo, C.-C. Huang, M. Xu, L. Wright, H. Shojanazeri, M. Ott, S. Shleifer, et al. Pytorch fsdp: experiences on scaling fully sharded data parallel.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.11277, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [60]

    J. Dong, B. Feng, D. Guessous, Y . Liang, and H. He. Flex attention: A programming model for generating optimized attention kernels.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05496, 2(3):4, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [61]

    Bouguet et al

    J.-Y . Bouguet et al. Pyramidal implementation of the affine lucas kanade feature tracker de- scription of the algorithm.Intel corporation, 5(1-10):4, 2001

    2001

  61. [62]

    Hartley and A

    R. Hartley and A. Zisserman.Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge univer- sity press, 2003

    2003

  62. [63]

    Romero, D

    J. Romero, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together.ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia), 36(6), Nov. 2017

    2017

  63. [64]

    B. Wen, W. Yang, J. Kautz, and S. Birchfield. Foundationpose: Unified 6d pose estimation and tracking of novel objects. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 17868–17879, 2024

    2024

  64. [65]

    Wiedmann, O

    L. Wiedmann, O. Zohar, A. Mahla, X. Wang, R. Li, T. Frere, L. von Werra, A. R. Gosthipaty, and A. Marafioti. Finevision: Open data is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.17269, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    E. Zhou, J. An, C. Chi, Y . Han, S. Rong, C. Zhang, P. Wang, Z. Wang, T. Huang, L. Sheng, et al. Roborefer: Towards spatial referring with reasoning in vision-language models for robotics. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38:28404–28481, 2026

    2026

  66. [67]

    H. Li, Z. Wang, Z.-h. Ding, S. Yang, Y . Chen, Y . Tian, X. Hu, T. Wang, D. Lin, F. Zhao, et al. Robointer: A holistic intermediate representation suite towards robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.09973, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  67. [68]

    W. Yuan, J. Duan, V . Blukis, W. Pumacay, R. Krishna, A. Murali, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox. Robopoint: A vision-language model for spatial affordance prediction for robotics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10721, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [69]

    Y . Tang, L. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y . Zhao, and X. Hao. Roboafford: A dataset and benchmark for enhancing object and spatial affordance learning in robot manipulation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 12706–12713, 2025

    2025

  69. [70]

    K. Chen, S. Xie, Z. Ma, P. R. Sanketi, and K. Goldberg. Robo2vlm: Visual question answering from large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15517, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    status":

    Y . Ji, H. Tan, J. Shi, X. Hao, Y . Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Wang, M. Zhao, Y . Mu, P. An, et al. Robobrain: A unified brain model for robotic manipulation from abstract to concrete. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1724–1734, 2025. 13 Appendix Table of Contents A Details of EgoSmith 15 A.1 Implementat...

    2025

  71. [72]

    It generally has a grey base and black fingers

    **The Agent’s Hand:** The moving entity is the agent’s bare end-effector. It generally has a grey base and black fingers

  72. [73]

    THESE ARE PART OF THE FINGERS

    **COLORED TIPS WARNING:** The tips/pads of the fingers often have GREEN, ORANGE, or RED tape/ markers on them. THESE ARE PART OF THE FINGERS. They are NOT separate tools

  73. [74]

    NEVER describe the agent as holding or using a ’green-tipped tool’, ’hot knife’, ’pliers’, or any handheld instrument

    **EMPTY-HANDED PRIOR:** The agent is operating empty-handed. NEVER describe the agent as holding or using a ’green-tipped tool’, ’hot knife’, ’pliers’, or any handheld instrument

  74. [75]

    This task name is your absolute ground truth for interpreting WHAT is being manipulated (Objects) and HOW it is being manipulated (Verbs)

    **ABSOLUTE GROUND TRUTH (TASK ALIGNMENT):** The specific task is **[{task_name}]**. This task name is your absolute ground truth for interpreting WHAT is being manipulated (Objects) and HOW it is being manipulated (Verbs). You MUST use the exact nouns implied by the task name

  75. [76]

    Write in fluent English, avoid awkward phrasing

    **GRAMMAR:** Your description must be in **simple present tense**. Write in fluent English, avoid awkward phrasing. **OBJECTIVE:** Describe the agent’s actions (focusing strictly on hand-object interactions) in **simple present tense** by integrating information from both views into a single, unified description at three levels of detail. **Since this is ...

  76. [77]

    **Unified Description:** Provide ONE consolidated set of descriptions

  77. [78]

    Should always be a verb+noun phrase (i .e Ring a bell) (<20 words)

    **Levels of Detail:** - **Level 1 (Gist):** A concise summary of the main action. Should always be a verb+noun phrase (i .e Ring a bell) (<20 words). - **Level 2 (Descriptive):** Main action + features and spatial layout of the **ACTIVELY MANIPULATED OBJECTS ONLY** (<40 words). **DO NOT list or describe any stationary background clutter.** In your descrip...

  78. [79]

    DO NOT use subjects (e.g., ’The person’, ’The robot’, ’The hand’, ’It’)

    **Zero Subjects (Strict):** **Start every single sentence directly with a verb** (e.g., ’Reach for ...’, ’Grasp...’). DO NOT use subjects (e.g., ’The person’, ’The robot’, ’The hand’, ’It’)

  79. [80]

    **Completely IGNORE all irrelevant background items** (e.g., wipes, boxes, tubes, stands that are not part of the task)

    **Strict Focus on Interaction (NO CLUTTER):** Focus ONLY on the objects being actively touched, moved, or interacted with (and their immediate targets/receptacles). **Completely IGNORE all irrelevant background items** (e.g., wipes, boxes, tubes, stands that are not part of the task) . Never write phrases like ’other items remain unchanged’ or ’in the background’

  80. [81]

    - DO NOT output colors of the agent’s hand/tips

    **Vocabulary Restrictions:** - DO NOT output words like ’robot’, ’mechanical arm’, ’gripper’, ’human’, or ’finger’. - DO NOT output colors of the agent’s hand/tips

Showing first 80 references.