Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Spacer-Mediated Gold Nanocube Arrays for Edge-Localized Excitonic Enhancement in Monolayer MoS2

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Size-tuned gold nanocube arrays on thin dielectric spacers give monolayer MoS2 up to ~350-fold photoluminescence enhancement via edge-localized plasmons.

desk verdict Solid FDTD design map for Au nanocubes on spacer/MoS2; the ~350 imes PL number is an overstated product that ignores the paper’s own quenching maps. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11768 v1 pith:JCX5DIYP submitted 2026-07-13 physics.optics physics.app-phphysics.comp-phquant-ph

Abdullah Efe Yildiz , Emre Ozan Polat This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-phphysics.comp-phquant-ph
keywords MonolayerMoS2Exciton-plasmoncouplingPurcellenhancementChargegenerationrateGoldnanocubesLocalizedsurfaceplasmonresonanceDielectricspacer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Monolayer MoS2 is only about a nanometer thick, so it absorbs and emits light poorly even though its A and B excitons are strong. This numerical study shows that periodic gold nanocubes, separated from the sheet by a few nanometers of Al2O3 or h-BN, concentrate light at the cube edges and can be size-tuned so their plasmon resonance overlaps those excitons. Excitation-rate gains of a few times multiply with radiative-decay-rate gains above 80 to produce estimated photoluminescence enhancements of order 350, largest for the thinnest spacers. Both excitonic channels brighten at once; relative strength shifts with cube size, spacer material, and thickness rather than switching one exciton fully off. The design is presented as a simple, scalable route to stronger light-matter interaction in 2D semiconductors without external fields or doping.

What carries the argument

Spacer-mediated gold nanocube arrays: flat-faceted Au cubes whose corner hot spots and size-dependent LSPR are further redshifted and attenuated by the dielectric spacer thickness and refractive index, so near-field intensity, carrier generation, and Purcell-type radiative enhancement at the MoS2 plane can be tuned together.

What would settle it

Fabricate 130 nm Au nanocube arrays on 2 nm Al2O3 over monolayer MoS2, measure absolute photoluminescence enhancement at 605 nm and 650 nm under the same excitation conditions used in the model, and check whether the observed factors approach the predicted ~350 and ~180; a large shortfall would falsify the product approximation or the continuum dipole treatment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Localized surface plasmons of size-tuned gold nanocube arrays, mediated by Al2O3 or h-BN spacers of controlled thickness, produce simultaneous excitation-rate enhancements up to 4.35 (B exciton, 605 nm) and 3.66 (A exciton, 650 nm) and radiative decay-rate enhancements exceeding 80 in monolayer MoS2, yielding estimated photoluminescence enhancements of roughly 350-fold while preserving the intrinsic excitonic spectrum and enabling wavelength-dependent rather than strictly selective excitonic modulation.

Load-bearing premise

The headline 350-fold photoluminescence boost is obtained by simply multiplying excitation and radiative-rate factors because the monolayer’s intrinsic quantum yield is taken to be extremely small, so non-radiative metal losses and any saturation under strong near-field coupling are assumed not to cancel the product.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cube side length plus spacer thickness and material become practical knobs for placing the plasmon resonance across the A/B excitonic window of MoS2.
  • Thinnest spacers maximize both carrier generation and radiative decay enhancement, giving a clear design rule for maximum PL gain.
  • The same platform can serve enhanced 2D photodetectors, nanoscale emitters, and excitonic sensors without external fields or chemical doping.
  • Both A and B channels remain active, so the structure supplies broadband wavelength-dependent brightening rather than single-exciton switching.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the geometry is compatible with colloidal or lithographic nanocube placement, the predicted gains are in principle transferable to large-area devices once experimental quantum-yield maps are measured.
  • The same spacer-and-size tuning should apply, with only modest re-optimization, to other group-VI TMD monolayers whose A/B excitons lie nearby in the visible.
  • Edge localization implies that sparse or non-periodic cube placements could still deliver local enhancement, potentially relaxing array-period constraints for integration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical FDTD study of monolayer MoS2 coupled to periodic Au nanocube arrays (side lengths 105 and 130 nm, period 250 nm) separated by Al2O3 or h-BN spacers of thickness 2–10 nm. Size- and spacer-tuned LSPR is used to modulate the A- and B-excitonic windows. From extinction, near-field maps, absorption, carrier-generation rate, and dipole-based radiative/non-radiative rates the authors report excitation enhancements up to 4.35 (B, 605 nm) and 3.66 (A, 650 nm), radiative-rate factors exceeding 80, and photoluminescence enhancements up to ~350-fold via the low-QY product PLE ≈ (G/G0) × Frad (Eq. 2; Table 2). They conclude that the platform yields wavelength-dependent rather than strictly exciton-selective enhancement and is a simple, scalable design for excitonic light–matter engineering in ML MoS2.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold under a self-consistent treatment of quantum yield, the work supplies a compact, fabrication-compatible design map (cube size + spacer material/thickness) for plasmon-enhanced excitonic absorption and emission in monolayer TMDs. The systematic comparison of Al2O3 versus h-BN, the sensing-volume interpretation of spacer-induced LSPR shifts (Eq. 1), and the multi-metric reporting (CGR, Frad, QE maps) go beyond single-geometry field-enhancement papers and would be useful for photodetectors, emitters, and sensors. Strengths include a transparent, literature-standard FDTD workflow (Johnson–Christy Au, Palik dielectrics, experimental MoS2 sheet conductivity, TFSF extinction, power-dissipation CGR, in-plane dipole decay rates) and clear tables that make the parameter trends reproducible. The absence of experiment is acceptable for a pure design study provided the headline numbers are internally consistent with the paper’s own decay-rate framework.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and Table 2 claim ~350-fold PL enhancement from the product PLE ≈ (G/G0) × Frad (Eq. 2) under the low-QY approximation η0 ~ 10^{-3}–10^{-4}. Methodology simultaneously defines QE = Frad/(Frad + Fnonrad) (Eq. 3) and Figure 5 maps η/η0 that already encode strong metal quenching at ts = 2 nm—the same geometry that maximizes Frad. Table 2 PLE entries never re-weight Frad by the computed QE (or by the standard factor 1/(1 + η0(Ftot – 1))). Consequently the headline 350× figure systematically overstates net emission relative to the paper’s own decay-rate framework and must be recomputed or clearly caveated before the central claim can stand.
  2. Methodology (Eqs. 7–13) models MoS2 as a continuum sheet conductivity and the exciton as a single in-plane dipole. At the reported Frad > 80 and sub-10 nm metal–semiconductor separations this continuum treatment omits exciton diffusion, saturation, and possible array-period collective effects that would reduce the effective enhancement. Without a short discussion or estimate of these corrections, the absolute 350-fold number remains an upper-bound continuum prediction rather than a robust device-level forecast.
minor comments (5)
  1. Figure 1e,f and Table 1: the LSPR peak shifts for Al2O3 and h-BN are reported to 0.1 nm precision; a brief statement of mesh convergence or wavelength sampling would strengthen confidence in the sub-nanometer differences.
  2. Figure 3 absorption spectra are normalized; absolute absorption or a side-by-side un-normalized panel would better support the claim that the AuNC only moderately reshapes the excitonic profile.
  3. Equation 1 is introduced as a sensing-volume model; the fitted or estimated values of m and ld used for the present AuNC geometry are not stated, making the quantitative link to Table 1 incomplete.
  4. Scattered typographical issues (e.g., “10 5” for 105 nm, missing spaces around units, “t s” vs ts) should be cleaned for readability.
  5. The self-citation to arXiv:2603.07732 is appropriate for related geometry work but should be clearly distinguished as prior numerical work by the same group rather than independent experimental validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: FDTD ratios and literature constants yield independent enhancement numbers; minor self-citation of related arXiv is non-essential.

full rationale

The paper's central claims (excitation factors up to 4.35/3.66, Frad >80, PLE ~350) are obtained by forward 3-D FDTD solutions of Maxwell's equations (Eqs. 4-5) using fixed, externally tabulated optical constants (Johnson-Christy Au, Palik Si/SiO2/Al2O3, experimental MoS2 sheet conductivity via Eqs. 6-7, h-BN dispersion). Carrier-generation maps (Eqs. 8-9) and dipole decay rates (Eqs. 10-15) are ratios to the identical bare-MoS2 reference under the same source; no free parameters are fitted to a target PL value and then re-predicted. Equation 1 is a standard sensing-volume expression used only for post-hoc interpretation of spacer-induced redshifts, not for generating the Table-2 numbers. The sole self-citation ([34], authors' hollow-nanocavity arXiv) appears solely as a qualitative comparison of redshift magnitude and does not enter the derivation of any enhancement factor. The low-QY product approximation PLE ≈ (G/G0) imes Frad (Eq. 2) is an external literature formula applied after the independent FDTD solves; any inconsistency with the separately computed QE maps (Eq. 3, Fig. 5) is a modeling-approximation issue, not a circular reduction of outputs to inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on classical electromagnetism, literature optical constants, a continuum sheet model of MoS2, an in-plane dipole Purcell model, and the low-QY PLE product formula. Geometry choices (a, ts, p) are design parameters, not fitted to experimental PL. No new particles or forces are introduced. The main non-standard load is the PLE approximation and the assumption that continuum FDTD plus experimental ε fully captures excitonic generation and emission under strong near-field gradients.

free parameters (4)
  • AuNC side lengths selected for study (a = 105 nm, 130 nm)
    Chosen from a 50–130 nm scan for spectral overlap with A/B excitons; not fitted to data but hand-selected as ‘exciton-peak-matching’ geometries that drive the main claims.
  • Array period p = 250 nm
    Fixed lattice constant in hybrid-device simulations; collective array effects depend on this choice and are not systematically varied.
  • Spacer thickness set {2,4,6,8,10} nm
    Discrete design grid controlling near-field reach and quenching; values are chosen by hand for the parameter sweep.
  • Intrinsic MoS2 quantum yield η0 ≈ 10^-3–10^-4
    Literature-order assumption used to justify PLE ≈ (G/G0)×Frad (Eq. 2); the numerical 350-fold claim scales with this regime.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Classical Maxwell FDTD with local linear media adequately describes LSPR–exciton interaction in the weak-coupling regime for these geometries.
    Invoked throughout Results and Methodology (Eqs. 4–5); paper states absence of peak splitting as evidence of weak coupling.
  • domain assumption Experimental bulk/film optical constants (Johnson–Christy Au; Palik Si/SiO2/Al2O3; literature h-BN and MoS2) apply unchanged in the hybrid stack.
    Methodology material models; no size-dependent dielectric corrections for ~100 nm cubes or interface chemistry.
  • domain assumption Monolayer MoS2 may be replaced by an in-plane isotropic sheet conductivity σ(ω) = −iωtε0[ε(ω)−1] for absorption and generation.
    Eqs. 6–9; standard 2D approximation but erases out-of-plane and atomistic detail under extreme field gradients at cube corners.
  • domain assumption For low η0, photoluminescence enhancement factors as excitation enhancement times normalized radiative decay rate.
    Eq. 2 and citations [30,38]; load-bearing for the 350-fold abstract claim.
  • domain assumption MoS2 exciton emission is represented by an in-plane classical electric dipole for Purcell/radiative and non-radiative rates.
    Methodology Eqs. 10–15; standard nanoantenna approach.
  • standard math Plasmon resonance shift with spacer follows a sensing-volume exponential model Δλ = mΔn[1−e^{−2ts/ld}].
    Eq. 1 used interpretively for spacer redshift; standard LSPR sensing formula.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spacer-Mediated Gold Nanocube Arrays for Edge-Localized Excitonic Enhancement in Monolayer MoS2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCX5DIYP

@misc{pith2026260711768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spacer-Mediated Gold Nanocube Arrays for Edge-Localized Excitonic Enhancement in Monolayer MoS2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCX5DIYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11768}
}
read the original abstract

Plasmonic nanostructures offer an effective route for enhancing light-matter interaction in atomically thin semiconductors, whose optical response is intrinsically limited by their sub-nanometer active thickness. Here, we numerically investigate excitonic enhancement in monolayer (ML) Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) coupled to size-tuned gold (Au) nanocube arrays separated by thin aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) spacer layers. By varying the nanocube side length, the localized surface plasmon resonance is tuned across the visible spectral range to modulate the A- and B-excitonic transitions of monolayer MoS2. We show that the nanocube-size-dependent spectral redshift can be further controlled through the spacer material and thickness, enabling systematic tuning of the near-field distribution, carrier generation rate, quantum yield, and radiative decay enhancement. Localized plasmonic confinement yields excitation-rate enhancements of up to 4.35 at B-excitonic transition (605 nm) and 3.66 at A-excitonic transition (650 nm), while the radiative decay-rate enhancement exceeds 80, leading to 350-fold photoluminescence enhancement. Although both A- and B-excitonic channels are enhanced simultaneously, their relative contributions depend on nanocube size, spacer material, and spacer thickness, indicating wavelength-dependent excitonic modulation rather than strict exciton-selective switching. These findings establish Au nanocube arrays as a simple, scalable, and tunable plasmonic platform for enhancing excitonic carrier generation and emission in ML MoS2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spacer mediated plasmonic response and design parameters of AuNCs. (a) Schematic illustration of a single AuNC with side length a placed on a dielectric spacer of thickness ts. (b,c) Near-field intensity maps of AuNCs with side lengths of 105 and 130 nm, respectively. Showing strong electric-field localization at the cube corners. (d) Extinction cross-section spectra for AuNCs with different side lengths from 50 to … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a demonstrates the integrated AuNC together with spacer material on ML MoS2 hosting substrate (SiO2/Si). Figures 2b and 2c show the wavelength- and spacer-thickness-dependent normalized in-plane E-field intensity, evaluated at the MoS2 plane for the 105 and 130 nm AuNCs with Al2O3 spacer. For both AuNC sizes, the strongest field enhancement occurs at small ts and decreases asts increases. The 105 nm cube provides a … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of monolayer MoS2 coupled to AuNC structures through Al2O3 and h-BN spacers. (a) Schematic of the periodic AuNC array integrated with the spacer/MoS2/SiO2/Si stack. The array period is p = 250 nm. (b) AuNC Normalized absorption spectra for MoS2 coupled to 105 nm wide AuNC through different spacers. The dashed line shows the excitons of bare monolayer MoS2 on SiO2/Si. (c,d) Normalized absorption sp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radiative decay enhancement and resulting quantum yield by the control of spacer thickness and AuNC size. (a) Wavelength- and spacer-thickness-dependent quantum yield response map for the 105 nm AuNC with Al2O3 spacer. (b) Radiative decay enhancement as a function of s…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Mak, K. F. et al. Atomically thin MoS₂: A new direct -gap semiconductor. Physical Review Letters vol. 105 136805 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS₂. Nano Letters vol. 10 1271–1275 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Wang, Q. H. et al. Electronics and optoelectronics of two -dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotechnology vol. 7 699–712 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of two -dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nature Chemistry vol. 5 263–275 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Butler, S. Z. et al. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two -dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano vol. 7 2898–2926 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Xiao, D. et al. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS₂ and other group -VI dichalcogenides. Physical Review Letters vol. 108 196802 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Li, Y. et al. Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition -metal dichalcogenides: MoS₂, MoSe₂, WS₂, and WSe₂. Physical Review B vol. 90 205422 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Chernikov, A. et al. Exciton binding energy and nonhydrogenic Rydberg series in monolayer WS₂. Physical Review Letters vol. 113 076802 (2014)

    2014

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    He, K. et al. Tightly bound excitons in monolayer WSe₂. Physical Review Letters vol. 113 026803 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    Ugeda, M. M. et al. Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Nature Materials vol. 13 1091–1095 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Klots, A. R. et al. Probing excitonic states in suspended two -dimensional semiconductors by photocurrent spectroscopy. Scientific Reports vol. 4 6608 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides

    Ramasubramaniam, A. Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides. Physical Review B vol. 86 115409 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Y., da Jornada, F

    Qiu, D. Y., da Jornada, F. H. & Louie, S. G. Optical spectrum of MoS₂: Many -body effects and diversity of exciton states. Physical Review Letters vol. 111 216805 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    & Grossman, J

    Bernardi, M., Palummo, M. & Grossman, J. C. Extraordinary sunlight absorption and one nanometer thick photovoltaics using two-dimensional monolayer materials. Nano Letters vol. 13 3664–3670 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    Amani, M. et al. Near -unity photoluminescence quantum yield in MoS₂. Science vol. 350 1065–1068 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    & Hecht, B

    Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics. Cambridge University Press (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    & Halas, N

    Lal, S., Link, S. & Halas, N. J. Nano -optics from sensing to waveguiding. Nature Photonics vol. 1 641–648 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Schuller, J. A. et al. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nature Materials vol. 9 193–204 (2010). 20

    2010

  12. [20]

    Stockman, M. I. Nanoplasmonics: Past, present, and glimpse into future. Optics Express vol. 19 22029–22106 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    & Novotny, L

    Anger, P., Bharadwaj, P. & Novotny, L. Enhancement and quenching of single -molecule fluorescence. Physical Review Letters vol. 96 113002 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    & Sandoghdar, V

    Kuhn, S., Hakanson, U., Rogobete, L. & Sandoghdar, V. Enhancement of single -molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna. Physical Review Letters vol. 97 017402 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    & Novotny, L

    Bharadwaj, P., Deutsch, B. & Novotny, L. Optical antennas. Advances in Optics and Photonics vol. 1 438–483 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    Koenderink, A. F. Single-photon nanoantennas. ACS Photonics vol. 4 710–722 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Shahbazyan, T. V. Local density of states for nanoplasmonics. Physical Review Letters vol. 117 207401 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    & Aydin, K

    Butun, S., Tongay, S. & Aydin, K. Enhanced light emission from large-area monolayer MoS₂ using plasmonic nanodisc arrays. Nano Letters vol. 15 2700–2704 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Lee, K. C. J. et al. Plasmonic gold nanorods coverage influence on enhancement of the photoluminescence of two -dimensional MoS₂ monolayer. Scientific Reports vol. 5 16374 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Lee, B. et al. Fano resonance and spectrally modified photoluminescence enhancement in monolayer MoS₂ integrated with plasmonic nanoantenna array. Nano Letters vol. 15 3646 – 3653 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Palacios, E. et al. Enhanced radiative emission from monolayer MoS₂ films using a single plasmonic dimer nanoantenna. Applied Physics Letters vol. 111 031101 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Garai, M. et al. Single-particle studies on plasmon enhanced photoluminescence of monolayer MoS₂ by gold nanoparticles of different shapes. Journal of Chemical Physics vol. 155 234201 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Murphy, C. J. Nanocubes and nanoboxes. Science vol. 298 2139–2141 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Ringe, E. et al. Unraveling the effects of size, composition, and substrate on the localized surface plasmon resonance frequencies of gold and silver nanocubes: A systematic single - particle approach. Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol. 114 12511–12516 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    B., Tsalu, P

    Jeon, H. B., Tsalu, P. V. & Ha, J. W. Shape effect on the refractive index sensitivity at localized surface plasmon resonance inflection points of single gold nanocubes with vertices. Scientific Reports vol. 9 13635 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Yildiz, A. E. & Polat, E. O. Geometry -Controlled Excitonic Emission Engineering in Monolayer MoS₂ Using Plasmonic Hollow Nanocavities. arXiv arXiv:2603.07732 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Stewart, M. E. et al. Multispectral thin film biosensing and quantitative imaging using 3D plasmonic crystals. Analytical Chemistry vol. 81 5980–5989 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Kaminska, I. et al. Near-field and far-field sensitivities of LSPR sensors. Journal of Physical Chemistry C vol. 119 9470–9476 (2015). 21

    2015

  29. [37]

    Hou, S. et al. Manipulating Coherent Light –Matter Interaction: Continuous Transition between Strong Coupling and Weak Coupling in MoS2 Monolayer Coupled with Plasmonic Nanocavities. Advanced Optical Materials 7, 1900857 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Zhao, W. et al. Exciton-Plasmon Coupling and Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in Monolayer Semiconductors Hybridized with Ag Nanoparticles. Advanced Materials vol. 28 2709–2715 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical Constants of the Noble Metals. Physical Review B vol. 6 4370–4379 (1972)

    1972

  32. [40]

    Edwards, D. F. Silicon (Si). Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids 547–569 (1985)

    1985

  33. [41]

    Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3)

    Gervais, F. Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3). Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids 761 –775 (1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    Philipp, H. R. Silicon Dioxide (SiO2), Type α (Crystalline). Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids 719–747 (1985)

    1985

  35. [43]

    Zotev, P. G. et al. Van der Waals materials for applications in nanophotonics. Laser & Photonics Reviews vol. 17 2200957 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Hsu, C. et al. Thickness-dependent refractive index of 1L, 2L, and 3L MoS₂, MoSe₂, WS₂, and WSe₂. Advanced Optical Materials vol. 7 1900239 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.