Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 226 references

How Does Empowering Users with Greater System Control Affect News Filter Bubbles?

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a 102-user experiment showing that letting readers adjust inferred political stance and topic sliders changes what a news recommender feeds them — reducing extremeness for most while cutting political diversity overall.

desk verdict A real empirical contribution undermined at the subgroup level by regression to the mean; the between-group effects and the awareness finding are the credible core. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15284 v1 pith:D5ZBGP3F submitted 2026-06-04 cs.IR cs.AI

Ping Liu , Karthik Shivaram , Aron Culotta , Matthew Shapiro , Mustafa Bilgic This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords filterbubblesnewsrecommendationusercontroltransparencypoliticaldiversitystudyrecommendersystemsechochambers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that giving people direct, transparent control over a political news recommender — sliders for political stance and topic interest — genuinely changes the recommender's trajectory compared with up/down voting alone. It finds heterogeneous effects: users initially shown extreme or moderately extreme articles steer toward less extreme content, while users initially shown mild content may steer toward more extreme content. In both groups, political diversity of the recommendations decreases. The transparency also makes users aware that they were in a filter bubble and more informed about how the recommender works. If these findings hold, they imply that user-control interfaces are a double-edged tool: they can moderate extremeness for some users but do not by themselves restore diverse news diets.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a recalibrated scoring function s = λ s_r + (1−λ)(Sim(u_t,a_t)+Sim(u_s,a_s))/2, where s_r is a content-based classifier's up-vote probability, u_s and u_t are user political-stance and topic-interest vectors initialized from a pre-questionnaire, and a_s/a_t are article stance/topic vectors. The enhanced interface lets users adjust u_t and u_s by moving sliders, reranking the top articles by binary search. The paper's measures — average political stance, extremeness (absolute stance), diversity (normalized entropy over five stances) and up-vote ratio — are computed on the top 200 ranked articles at the beginning and end of each session, with users split into low/medium/high s

What would settle it

A researcher could re-run the analysis with a change-score model that conditions on the begin value (e.g., regress end−begin on begin and treatment, or use a regression-discontinuity at the low/medium/high cutpoints). If the apparent 'sweet spot' — high values falling and low values rising — disappears once begin values are controlled nonlinearly, then the central steering claim is a regression artifact. Alternatively, a randomized experiment that assigns the same initial extremeness level to users independent of their own profile would settle it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that an interactive transparency-and-control interface changes the recommendation trajectory in a user-dependent way. In the treatment group, users whose recommender began with medium or high extremeness significantly reduced extremeness, while those who began with low extremeness increased it, producing a kind of extremeness 'sweet spot'. Users also moved political stance toward the center, yet normalized entropy of political stances in the top-ranked articles decreased for both control and treatment, meaning diversity fell. The up-vote ratio rose most for users who initially up-voted few articles, and the post-questionnaire showed that transparency made users reali

Load-bearing premise

The paper's subgroup-specific conclusions assume that users binned by their starting value of the same outcome measure show changes that reflect genuine steering, not statistical regression to the mean.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If replicated, the results imply that transparency-and-slider interfaces are a practical way to let willing users pull a recommender away from extreme partisan content.
  • The 'sweet spot' pattern suggests users do not seek maximal extremity; there is a comfort zone of moderate partisanship.
  • Because diversity fell even when extremeness fell, moderating extremeness and preserving viewpoint diversity are distinct goals that may need separate design levers.
  • The post-questionnaire result — control users changed their diversity rating after seeing the actual stance histogram — implies users cannot accurately perceive a filter bubble without external transparency.
  • Heterogeneous effects in the treatment group warn that the same control tool can move different users in opposite directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The subgroup analysis bins users by the beginning value of the very measure being studied (extremeness, diversity, up-vote ratio), so part of the high-decrease/low-increase pattern may be regression to the mean rather than user steering; a design that randomizes initial positions or matches users on begin values would disentangle these.
  • If the diversity decrease is real, a combined interface that lets users express 'diversity' as a goal (not just stance and topic) might recover the lost diversity; the paper's own discussion suggests more complex per-topic preference expressions.
  • The awareness effect (control users revising their diversity estimate after seeing the histogram) suggests a low-cost policy lever: platforms could display a stance histogram of the user's recommendation feed without any interactive sliders.
  • Because the study covers one hour and 102 users, the extremeness sweet spot could be a short-horizon effect; longer-term measurement (weeks) could test whether users keep pulling toward the center or drift back.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a user study of 102 Mechanical Turk participants comparing a traditional political news recommender (up-vote/down-vote only) with an enhanced interface that displays the system's inferred political-stance and topic-interest profile and lets users adjust sliders to modify future recommendations. The authors define four outcome measures — average extremeness, political stance, diversity (normalized entropy), and up-vote ratio — computed over the top-K recommended articles before and after the session. They claim that the treatment group steered the system toward less extreme content when initially shown extreme content, toward more extreme content when initially shown mild content, and toward the political center; that diversity decreased in both groups; and that the transparent interface increased user awareness of filter bubbles. The analysis is primarily based on within-group begin-to-end changes and treatment-control differences within subgroups defined by the initial value of each outcome measure.

Significance. If the findings hold, the paper makes a worthwhile contribution to the user-control and filter-bubble literature by providing behavioral evidence from a deployed system rather than simulation. The study design includes attention checks, bootstrapped confidence intervals, and a publicly available code/data repository, which are concrete strengths. However, the central subgroup-specific conclusions are vulnerable to regression to the mean because subgroups are formed from the baseline of the same outcome measure, and the statistical evidence for many specific effects is weaker than the abstract suggests once the full multiple-testing family is considered. The awareness claim also rests on a comparison that was only run in the control arm. With appropriate robustness analyses and revised interpretations, the paper could be a solid empirical contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, subgroup construction and Figure 2] The low/medium/high subgroups are formed by ranking all 102 users on the begin value m_b of the very measure being analyzed. Because m_b and m_e are repeated, noisy measurements of the same recommender state (top-K aggregate from a bootstrap-seeded model; up-vote ratio from 10 votes), a user with an extreme m_b will tend to move toward the mean at m_e even with no change in preferences. This mechanically produces the observed pattern of high subgroups decreasing and low subgroups increasing. This directly threatens the 'extremeness sweet spot' interpretation and the associated abstract claims. Please provide an independent baseline for subgrouping (e.g., pre-questionnaire ideology or initial model parameters), or model the change as a function of m_b with an explicit regression-to-the-mean correction, or compare against a no-interaction repeated-measures control.
  2. [Table 3 and statistical significance] Table 3 reports 48 t-tests (4 measures × 4 groups × 3 comparisons: C begin/end, T begin/end, C vs T change), but the caption describes a Bonferroni correction for 'four hypotheses per measure.' Within each measure there are actually 12 tests, so a proper Bonferroni threshold would be approximately 0.004, not 0.0125. Many reported significant effects (e.g., extremeness low Δ=.28, p=.034; political stance strong liberal Δ=.35, p=.064; diversity medium Δ=.15, p=.047; up-vote medium Δ=.14, p=.033) would not survive an FDR or full-family correction. Please report multiplicity-adjusted p-values or clearly pre-specify a smaller confirmatory family and label the remaining results as exploratory.
  3. [Section 4, Post-questionnaire analysis] The claim that the enhanced interface helped users realize they were in a filter bubble is not directly supported by the Qb/Qc comparison. The pre/post diversity question was administered only to the control group, with a histogram shown between the two responses; the treatment group did not receive the same manipulation. Thus the observed drop in Qc shows that transparency about the article distribution changes self-reports in the control group, but it does not establish that the treatment UI increased awareness relative to the control group. The Qd self-report is a single Likert item and is susceptible to demand characteristics. Please add the corresponding Qb–Qc comparison in the treatment arm or soften the causal wording in the abstract and conclusions.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (1) and sensitivity of λ and K] In the treatment arm, the sliders directly update u_t and u_s in Eq. (1), so the begin-to-end changes in extremeness, stance, and diversity are partly a consequence of the pre-specified mapping from user input to ranking, rather than an emergent trajectory from user preferences alone. This is by design, but the RQ1 interpretation should be qualified as measuring the joint effect of direct control and subsequent system updates. In addition, λ=0.4 is selected on the basis of undisclosed 'preliminary analysis' and no sensitivity analysis is reported; since the slider-based recalibration recomputes the top-K ranking through this weighted sum, the magnitude and direction of treatment effects could depend on λ and on K=200. Please report sensitivity analyses for these parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The paper contains several typos (e.g., 'bu it' instead of 'but it' in the post-questionnaire paragraph) and some undefined notation early (K in Eqs. 2–4 is not defined until later). A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Section 4, subgroup samples] Because subgroups are based on the full 102-user ranking, the number of control and treatment users in each low/medium/high bin may be unbalanced. Please report the arm sizes per subgroup, particularly for the political-stance subgroups labeled 'strong liberal,' 'liberal,' and 'conservative.'
  3. [Table 3 caption] The caption does not specify the direction of the one-tailed tests used for the 'Change' columns, nor does it justify why RQ2 tests are one-tailed while RQ1 tests are two-tailed. Please state the alternative hypotheses explicitly.
  4. [Figure 2] Many bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals are visually invisible at the plotted scale; consider numeric error bars or separate panels with annotations. Reporting effect sizes (e.g., Cohen's d) alongside p-values would also aid interpretation given the modest sample size.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states that 'the transparent approach helped users realize that they were in a filter bubble,' but the only direct evidence is the within-control Qb→Qc change. Please align the abstract with the actual between-group evidence, or add the missing treatment-arm comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's empirical user study does not derive its conclusions from its own definitions or from a load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the outcome of a new user study, not of a derivation from its own equations. Equation (1) is a design equation for combining a content-based score with user-profile similarity, and Eqs. (2)–(5) define measurement quantities; none of the findings is logically entailed by these definitions. The treatment/control comparison is based on randomized assignment, so the between-group results are not forced by construction. The dataset and simulation results of Liu et al. (2021) are self-citations, but they are used to motivate expectations and to supply the article corpus; the conclusions rest on newly collected behavioral data from 102 users. The subgroup analysis ranks users by the begin value m_b of the same measure and then tests m_e − m_b; this can raise a regression-to-the-mean concern, but that is a statistical validity threat, not a definitional circularity, because m_e is a separate observation and no parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renamed empirical pattern is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or model entities. It relies on several domain assumptions about the validity of stance labels, questionnaire mapping, the content-based model, and the diversity metric. The main free parameters are design choices (λ, K, bootstrap sizes, binning, vote windows) that affect all outcome measures. The most consequential assumption is that the begin-value-binned subgroups represent stable user types rather than statistical artifacts.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda (λ) = 0.4
    In Eq. 1, λ=0.4 balances the content-based score s_r and the profile-match score; the paper states it was chosen via preliminary analysis (Section 'Recalibration of the scores'). It directly shapes all recommendations and therefore all outcome measures.
  • K (top-K articles) = 200
    State measures (Eqs. 2–4) are computed over the top K=200 ranked articles; K was chosen to give 11 topics × 5 stances a chance to appear (Section 'Measures').
  • bootstrap sample size per stance pairing = 25 positive + 25 negative per (topic, stance) pair
    Cold-start training set construction draws 25 matching and 25 opposing articles per stance pairing (Section 'Content-based recommender'); this affects the initial model quality.
  • subgroup tercile boundaries = 34 users per bin
    Users are split into low/medium/high subgroups by rank of begin value, making the bin boundaries data-dependent (Section 'Evaluation Methodology and Findings').
  • up-vote ratio window = First and last 10 of 30 votes
    Begin/end up-vote ratio uses the first/last ten up/down-voted articles (Section 'Evaluation Methodology'), a choice that affects the noise properties of this measure.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AllSides stance ratings are the true political stance of articles.
    Dataset section: each article is annotated with a stance in {-2..+2} by AllSides; all extremeness, stance, and diversity measures inherit these labels as ground truth.
  • domain assumption Pew-style Likert responses can be mapped to continuous stance and interest vectors.
    The pre-questionnaire (Table 2) initializes u_s and u_t; the mapping from five-point Likert responses to real numbers in [-2,2] and [0,5]-like interest scales is not validated.
  • domain assumption A logistic regression over tf-idf features predicts user up-vote behavior well enough for the study.
    The content-based recommender (Section 'Content-based recommender') uses this model; no offline accuracy or ablation is reported, so model quality is implicitly assumed adequate.
  • domain assumption Cosine similarity between user and article stance/interest vectors is a meaningful preference match.
    Eq. 1 combines Sim(u_t,a_t) and Sim(u_s,a_s); this assumes cosine similarity on these small discrete vectors captures user preference alignment.
  • domain assumption Normalized political-stance entropy captures news diversity as intended.
    Eq. 4 measures only diversity across the 5 AllSides stance categories; it does not capture topic diversity, source diversity, or other dimensions users might care about.
  • domain assumption Self-reported questionnaire answers, up/down-votes, and slider moves reflect true user preferences.
    The study assumes users act rationally and truthfully; attention checks remove careless participants (44 of 146), but strategic or demand-driven behavior cannot be ruled out.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How Does Empowering Users with Greater System Control Affect News Filter Bubbles?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D5ZBGP3F

@misc{pith2026260715284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How Does Empowering Users with Greater System Control Affect News Filter Bubbles?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D5ZBGP3F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15284}
}
read the original abstract

While recommendation systems enable users to find articles of interest, they can also create ``filter bubbles'' by presenting content that reinforces users' pre-existing beliefs. Users are often unaware that the system placed them in a filter bubble and, even when aware, they often lack direct control over it. To address these issues, we first design a political news recommendation system augmented with an enhanced interface that exposes the political and topical interests the system inferred from user behavior. This allows the user to adjust the recommendation system to receive more articles on a particular topic or presenting a particular political stance. We then conduct a user study to compare our system to a traditional interface and found that the transparent approach helped users realize that they were in a filter bubble. Additionally, the enhanced system led to less extreme news for most users but also allowed others to move the system to more extremes. Similarly, while many users moved the system from extreme liberal/conservative to the center, this came at the expense of reducing political diversity of the articles shown. These findings suggest that, while the proposed system increased awareness of the filter bubbles, it had heterogeneous effects on news consumption depending on user preferences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15284 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. User interface to provide transparency and control [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Beginning (m g b ) and ending (mg e ) values, with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (1000 bootstrap samples), for each measure and subgroup, where subgroups are determined by the initial value of the system for each user. Rightmost graphs present changes over time (i.e., δ g m = mg e − m g b ). that the treatment group experienced larger shifts towards the center than the control group when considering the all … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Post-questionnaire results. 1: strongly disagree, 5: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example recommendation page for a user in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A sample transparency figure provided to users in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Political Research Quarterly , author =

    The rise of partisanship and the expansion of partisan conflict within the. Political Research Quarterly , author =. 2005 , pages =

    2005

  2. [2]

    Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No

    Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: an experimental study , abstract =. Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 272 , author =. 2012 , file =

    2012

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Birds of a feather don’t fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter’s Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking program , author=. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    2022

  4. [4]

    2023 , booktitle =

    Li, Zhenyang and Dong, Yancheng and Gao, Chen and Zhao, Yizhou and Li, Dong and Hao, Jianye and Zhang, Kai and Li, Yong and Wang, Zhi , title =. 2023 , booktitle =

    2023

  5. [5]

    and Resnick, Paul , title =

    Munson, Sean A. and Resnick, Paul , title =. 2010 , booktitle =

    2010

  6. [6]

    Kelly and Kriplean, Travis and Munson, Sean A

    Resnick, Paul and Garrett, R. Kelly and Kriplean, Travis and Munson, Sean A. and Stroud, Natalie Jomini , title =. 2013 , booktitle =

    2013

  7. [7]

    Similarity vs

    Smyth, Barry and McClave, Paul. Similarity vs. Diversity. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. 2001

    2001

  8. [8]

    Knowledge-based systems , volume=

    Diversity in recommender systems--A survey , author=. Knowledge-based systems , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

Show all 226 references
  1. [9]

    , year =

    Habermas, J. , year =. The structural transformation of the public sphere:

  2. [10]

    , year =

    Habermas, J. , year =. The theory of communicative action:

  3. [11]

    Pew Research Center - Journalism & Media , author =

    8 key takeaways about social media and news , url =. Pew Research Center - Journalism & Media , author =

  4. [12]

    The Krakatoa Chronicle-an interactive, personalized newspaper on the Web , author=. In Proc. 4th Intl. WWW Conf , year=

  5. [13]

    and Mucklo, M.J

    Chesnais, P.R. and Mucklo, M.J. and Sheena, J.A. , booktitle=. The Fishwrap personalized news system , year=

  6. [14]

    Psychological Science in the Public Interest , author =

    Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing , volume =. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , author =. 2012 , pages =

    2012

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

    Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification , author=. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

  8. [16]

    Nature human behaviour , volume=

    Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America , author=. Nature human behaviour , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  9. [17]

    Political Communication , volume=

    Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? , author=. Political Communication , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  10. [18]

    Political Behavior , volume=

    Exposure to extremely partisan news from the other political side shows scarce boomerang effects , author=. Political Behavior , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  11. [19]

    Annals of the International Communication Association , volume=

    News recommender systems: A programmatic research review , author=. Annals of the International Communication Association , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  12. [20]

    Workshop on Recommender Systems-Implementation and Evaluation , year=

    Combing content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper , author=. Workshop on Recommender Systems-Implementation and Evaluation , year=

  13. [21]

    2019 , issue_date =

    Tsai, Chun-Hua and Brusilovsky, Peter , title =. 2019 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3231465 , journal =

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

    Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments , author=. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pages=

  15. [23]

    ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    Designing for the better by taking users into account: A qualitative evaluation of user control mechanisms in (news) recommender systems , author=. ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  16. [24]

    Evolution of Filter Bubbles and Polarization in News Recommendation

    Zhang, Han and Zhu, Ziwei and Caverlee, James. Evolution of Filter Bubbles and Polarization in News Recommendation. Advances in Information Retrieval. 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    2023 , issue_date =

    Srba, Ivan and Moro, Robert and Tomlein, Matus and Pecher, Branislav and Simko, Jakub and Stefancova, Elena and Kompan, Michal and Hrckova, Andrea and Podrouzek, Juraj and Gavornik, Adrian and Bielikova, Maria , title =. 2023 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3568392 , journal =

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    A. G. Ekström, G. Madison, E. J. Olsson and M. Tsapos , title =. Information, Communication & Society , volume =. 2023 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2023.2230242 , URL =

    2023

  19. [27]

    MIS quarterly , pages=

    Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , author=. MIS quarterly , pages=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  20. [28]

    Morris and Gordon B

    Viswanath Venkatesh and Michael G. Morris and Gordon B. Davis and Fred D. Davis , journal =. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , urldate =

  21. [29]

    Decision sciences , volume=

    Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions , author=. Decision sciences , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  22. [30]

    Recommender systems handbook , pages=

    Novelty and diversity in recommender systems , author=. Recommender systems handbook , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  23. [31]

    Conference Companion Publication of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing , pages=

    Pop: Bursting News Filter Bubbles on Twitter Through Diverse Exposure , author=. Conference Companion Publication of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing , pages=

  24. [32]

    Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , volume=

    Polarization as a Function of Citizen Predispositions and Exposure to News on the Internet , author=. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  25. [33]

    and Drogos, Kristin L

    Coe, Kevin and Tewksbury, David and Bond, Bradley J. and Drogos, Kristin L. and Porter, Robert W. and Yahn, Ashley and Zhang, Yuanyuan , title = ". Journal of Communication , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00381.x , url =

    2008

  26. [34]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    NudgeCred: Supporting News Credibility Assessment on Social Media Through Nudges , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  27. [35]

    and Eckles, Dean and Rand, David G

    Pennycook, Gordon and Epstein, Ziv and Mosleh, Mohsen and Arechar, Antonio A. and Eckles, Dean and Rand, David G. , title =. Nature , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  28. [36]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

    Bursting the Filter Bubble: Fairness-Aware Network Link Prediction , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

  29. [37]

    Guess and Richard Bonneau and Jonathan Nagler and Joshua A

    Kevin Aslett and Andrew M. Guess and Richard Bonneau and Jonathan Nagler and Joshua A. Tucker , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2022 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abl3844 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    2021 , doi =

    Nyhan, Brendan , title =. 2021 , doi =. https://www.pnas.org/content/118/15/e1912440117.full.pdf , journal =

    2021

  31. [39]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  32. [40]

    Journal of Communication , volume =

    Kim, Jin Woo and Guess, Andrew and Nyhan, Brendan and Reifler, Jason , title = ". Journal of Communication , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/joc/jqab034 , url =

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size , journal =

    Saifuddin Ahmed , keywords =. Who inadvertently shares deepfakes? Analyzing the role of political interest, cognitive ability, and social network size , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101508 , url =

    2021

  34. [42]

    Human Communication Research , volume =

    Hopp, Toby and Ferrucci, Patrick and Vargo, Chris J , title = ". Human Communication Research , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz022 , url =

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    The Social Science Journal , volume =

    Tom Buchanan , title =. The Social Science Journal , volume =. 2021 , publisher =. doi:10.1080/03623319.2021.1975085 , URL =

    2021

  36. [44]

    The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review , journal =

    Luca Iandoli and Simonetta Primario and Giuseppe Zollo , keywords =. The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 , url =

    2021

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the 16th

    Reducing Cross-Topic Political Homogenization in Content-Based News Recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 16th

  38. [46]

    Social Media + Society , volume =

    Anna Sophie Kümpel and Veronika Karnowski and Till Keyling , title =. Social Media + Society , volume =. 2015 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00074 , year=

    Engagement Outweighs Exposure to Partisan and Unreliable News within Google Search , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00074 , year=

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bilgic, Mustafa and Mooney, Raymond , title =. Proceedings of Beyond Personalization 2005: A Workshop on the Next Stage of Recommender Systems Research at the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces , year =

    2005

  41. [49]

    Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 , pages=

    The Interaction between Political Typology and Filter Bubbles in News Recommendation Algorithms , author=. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 , pages=

    2021

  42. [50]

    American Journal of Political Science , volume=

    Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys , author=. American Journal of Political Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  43. [51]

    Pew Research Center , year=

    Political typology reveals deep fissures on the right and left: Conservative Republican groups divided on immigration,‘openness’ , author=. Pew Research Center , year=

  44. [52]

    AAAI conference on weblogs and social media , year=

    Encouraging reading of diverse political viewpoints with a browser widget , author=. AAAI conference on weblogs and social media , year=

  45. [53]

    Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , volume=

    Empirical Evaluation of Three Common Assumptions in Building Political Media Bias Datasets , author=. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media , volume=

  46. [54]

    Pew Research Center , year=

    About one-fifth of Democrats and Republicans get political news in a kind of media buble , author=. Pew Research Center , year=

  47. [55]

    Leeper , title =

    Thomas J. Leeper , title =. Political Communication , volume =. 2020 , publisher =

    2020

  48. [56]

    Political Communication , volume =

    Subhayan Mukerjee and Tian Yang , title =. Political Communication , volume =. 2020 , publisher =

    2020

  49. [57]

    International Journal of Communication , volume =

    Yotam Shmargad and Samara Klar , title =. International Journal of Communication , volume =. 2019 , keywords =

    2019

  50. [58]

    Political Communication , volume =

    Yotam Shmargad and Samara Klar , title =. Political Communication , volume =. 2020 , publisher =

    2020

  51. [59]

    Digital Journalism , volume =

    Elia Powers , title =. Digital Journalism , volume =. 2017 , publisher =

    2017

  52. [60]

    Information, Communication & Society , volume =

    Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen , title =. Information, Communication & Society , volume =. 2019 , publisher =

    2019

  53. [61]

    International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

    Human interaction with recommendation systems , author=. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

  54. [62]

    Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility , author=. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  55. [63]

    Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    Degenerate feedback loops in recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2019

  56. [64]

    Public opinion quarterly , volume=

    Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption , author=. Public opinion quarterly , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  57. [65]

    Psychological science , volume=

    Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? , author=. Psychological science , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  58. [66]

    Nature Human Behaviour , pages=

    Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation , author=. Nature Human Behaviour , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  59. [67]

    Science , volume=

    Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , author=. Science , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  60. [68]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=

    Suppressing the search engine manipulation effect (SEME) , author=. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  61. [69]

    PloS one , volume=

    Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube , author=. PloS one , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  62. [70]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  63. [71]

    All the news that you don't like: Cross-cutting exposure and political participation in the age of social media

    Seong Jae Min and Donghee Yvette Wohn. All the news that you don't like: Cross-cutting exposure and political participation in the age of social media. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018

    2018

  64. [72]

    Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review , volume=

    Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media , author=. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review , volume=

  65. [73]

    Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference , pages=

    Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship , author=. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference , pages=

    2018

  66. [74]

    British Journal of Social Psychology , volume=

    The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modelling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers , author=. British Journal of Social Psychology , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  67. [75]

    Marketing Science , volume=

    Curation algorithms and filter bubbles in social networks , author=. Marketing Science , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  68. [76]

    Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

    Siren: A simulation framework for understanding the effects of recommender systems in online news environments , author=. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages=

  69. [77]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Manipulating Google’s Knowledge Graph box to counter biased information processing during an online search on vaccination: application of a technological debiasing strategy , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  70. [78]

    Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

    Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views , author=. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining , pages=

  71. [79]

    Shapiro and Han Woo Park , title =

    Matthew A. Shapiro and Han Woo Park , title =. Environmental Communication , volume =. 2018 , publisher =

    2018

  72. [80]

    , title =

    Mosleh, Mohsen and Martel, Cameron and Eckles, Dean and Rand, David G. , title =. 2021 , doi =. https://www.pnas.org/content/118/7/e2022761118.full.pdf , journal =

    2021

  73. [81]

    Digital Journalism , pages=

    Shareworthiness and Motivated Reasoning in Hyper-Partisan News Sharing Behavior on Twitter , author=. Digital Journalism , pages=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  74. [82]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Petter Törnberg , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2022 , doi =. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2207159119 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    Rand , keywords =

    Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand , keywords =. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , journal =. 2019 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 , url =

    2019 doi

  76. [84]

    Psychological science , volume=

    Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention , author=. Psychological science , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  77. [85]

    Shapiro and Han Woo Park , title =

    Matthew A. Shapiro and Han Woo Park , title =. Social Science Information , volume =

  78. [86]

    International Conference on Internet Science , pages=

    Serendipity by design? How to turn from diversity exposure to diversity experience to face filter bubbles in social media , author=. International Conference on Internet Science , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  79. [87]

    Available at SSRN , volume=

    Ideological segregation and the effects of social media on news consumption , author=. Available at SSRN , volume=

  80. [88]

    Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing , author=

  81. [89]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    The consequences of online partisan media , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  82. [90]

    , author=

    (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans' online media diets. , author=. New York University , year=

  83. [91]

    Tucker , title =

    Gregory Eady and Jonathan Nagler and Andy Guess and Jan Zilinsky and Joshua A. Tucker , title =. SAGE Open , volume =

  84. [92]

    Salganik and Duncan J

    Matthew J. Salganik and Duncan J. Watts , journal =. Leading the Herd Astray: An Experimental Study of Self-fulfilling Prophecies in an Artificial Cultural Market , volume =

  85. [93]

    and Tormala, Zakary L

    Pablo Bri \ n ol and Rucker, Derek D. and Tormala, Zakary L. and Petty, Richard E. Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. Resistance and Persuasion. 2003

    2003

  86. [94]

    Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing , pages=

    Gobo: A System for Exploring User Control of Invisible Algorithms in Social Media , author=. Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing , pages=

    2019

  87. [95]

    RecSim: A Configurable Simulation Platform for Recommender Systems , publisher =

    Ie, Eugene and Hsu, Chih-wei and Mladenov, Martin and Jain, Vihan and Narvekar, Sanmit and Wang, Jing and Wu, Rui and Boutilier, Craig , keywords =. RecSim: A Configurable Simulation Platform for Recommender Systems , publisher =. 2019 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1909.04...

    2019 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    2019 , eprint=

    RecSim: A Configurable Simulation Platform for Recommender Systems , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  89. [97]

    2011 , publisher=

    The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  90. [98]

    Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web , pages=

    Personalized recommendation on dynamic content using predictive bilinear models , author=. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web , pages=

  91. [99]

    ACM SIGIR Forum , volume=

    SIGIR 2003 workshop report: implicit measures of user interests and preferences , author=. ACM SIGIR Forum , volume=. 2003 , organization=

    2003

  92. [100]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Logistic matrix factorization for implicit feedback data , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  93. [101]

    Advances in experimental social psychology , volume=

    Selective exposure , author=. Advances in experimental social psychology , volume=. 1965 , publisher=

    1965

  94. [102]

    , author=

    The case for motivated reasoning. , author=. Psychological bulletin , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  95. [103]

    Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality , volume=

    Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning , author=. Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  96. [104]

    Political Behavior , author =

    The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion , volume =. Political Behavior , author =. 2014 , pages =

    2014

  97. [105]

    Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource , pages=

    The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it , author=. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource , pages=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  98. [106]

    Druckman, James N. , year=. Communicating Policy-Relevant Science , volume=. PS: Political Science & Politics , publisher=

  99. [107]

    Psychological Bulletin , author =

    The case for motivated reasoning , volume =. Psychological Bulletin , author =. 1990 , pages =

    1990

  100. [108]

    , editor =

    Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles S. , editor =. Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning , booktitle =. 2000 , pages =

    2000

  101. [109]

    Political Behavior , volume=

    The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion , author=. Political Behavior , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  102. [110]

    European journal of social psychology , volume=

    Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions , author=. European journal of social psychology , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  103. [111]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  104. [112]

    American Journal of Sociology , volume=

    Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion , author=. American Journal of Sociology , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  105. [113]

    The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication , pages=

    Using frames to make scientific communication more effective , author=. The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication , pages=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  106. [114]

    The Sociological Quarterly , volume=

    The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001--2010 , author=. The Sociological Quarterly , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2001

  107. [115]

    Journal of artificial intelligence research , volume=

    SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique , author=. Journal of artificial intelligence research , volume=

  108. [116]

    , author=

    Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time. , author=. Translational Issues in Psychological Science , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  109. [117]

    Neural computation , volume=

    Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization with the -divergence , author=. Neural computation , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  110. [118]

    The adaptive web , pages=

    Content-based recommendation systems , author=. The adaptive web , pages=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  111. [119]

    Decision Support Systems , volume=

    Input online review data and related bias in recommender systems , author=. Decision Support Systems , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  112. [120]

    Boydstun and Dallas Card and Justin Gross and Paul Resnick and Noah A

    Amber E. Boydstun and Dallas Card and Justin Gross and Paul Resnick and Noah A. Smith. Tracking the Development of Media Frames within and across Policy Issues. 2014. doi:10.1184/R1/6473780.v1

    2014 doi

  113. [121]

    The media frames corpus: Annotations of frames across issues , author=. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers) , pages=

  114. [122]

    Policy , volume=

    Classifying frames at the sentence level in news articles , author=. Policy , volume=

  115. [123]

    Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science , pages=

    Ideological phrase indicators for classification of political discourse framing on Twitter , author=. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science , pages=

  116. [124]

    ACM Transactions on Social Computing , volume=

    Identifying framing bias in online news , author=. ACM Transactions on Social Computing , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  117. [125]

    International Journal on Digital Libraries , volume=

    Automated identification of media bias in news articles: an interdisciplinary literature review , author=. International Journal on Digital Libraries , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  118. [126]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01803 , year=

    A Systematic Media Frame Analysis of 1.5 Million New York Times Articles from 2000 to 2017 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01803 , year=

    2000 arXiv

  119. [127]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08608 , year=

    FrameAxis: Characterizing Framing Bias and Intensity with Word Embedding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08608 , year=

    2002 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Review of Policy Research , volume=

    Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences , author=. Review of Policy Research , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  121. [129]

    Illegal,

    " Illegal,"" Undocumented," or" Unauthorized": Equivalency Frames, Issue Frames, and Public Opinion on Immigration , author=. Perspectives on Politics , pages=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  122. [130]

    International Journal of Communication , volume=

    Deciding who's legitimate: News media framing of immigrants and refugees , author=. International Journal of Communication , volume=

  123. [131]

    Policy Studies Journal , volume=

    Narrative strategies in the gun policy debate: Exploring proximity and social construction , author=. Policy Studies Journal , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  124. [132]

    Journal of Social and Political Sciences , volume=

    European & American Think Tanks and the Reality of US-China Trade War: An NPF Application , author=. Journal of Social and Political Sciences , volume=

  125. [133]

    Policy studies journal , volume=

    Tracking the coverage of public policy in mass media , author=. Policy studies journal , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  126. [134]

    Political Communication , pages=

    Media Coverage of Campaign Promises Throughout the Electoral Cycle , author=. Political Communication , pages=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  127. [135]

    Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences , volume=

    Climate change discourse in mass media: application of computer-assisted content analysis , author=. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  128. [136]

    Discourse of Derision

    The “Discourse of Derision” in News Coverage of Education: A Mixed Methods Analysis of an Emerging Frame , author=. American Journal of Education , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  129. [137]

    Computer networks and ISDN systems , volume=

    The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine , author=. Computer networks and ISDN systems , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  130. [138]

    Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

    Web-scale Bayesian click-through rate prediction for sponsored search advertising in Microsoft's bing search engine , author=. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

  131. [139]

    Artificial Intelligence in medicine , volume=

    Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective , author=. Artificial Intelligence in medicine , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  132. [140]

    Expert systems with applications , volume=

    Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis , author=. Expert systems with applications , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  133. [141]

    2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite , author=. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=. 2012 , organization=

    2012

  134. [142]

    Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Deepdriving: Learning affordance for direct perception in autonomous driving , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  135. [143]

    AAAI-97 Workshop on Fraud Detection and Risk Management , pages=

    Credit card fraud detection using meta-learning: Issues and initial results , author=. AAAI-97 Workshop on Fraud Detection and Risk Management , pages=

  136. [144]

    Information Fusion , volume=

    Credit card fraud detection: A fusion approach using Dempster--Shafer theory and Bayesian learning , author=. Information Fusion , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  137. [145]

    Marketing science , volume=

    Mining brand perceptions from twitter social networks , author=. Marketing science , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  138. [146]

    2005 , institution=

    Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the web , author=. 2005 , institution=

    2005

  139. [147]

    AI magazine , volume=

    Collective classification in network data , author=. AI magazine , volume=

  140. [148]

    2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing , pages=

    Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks , author=. 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing , pages=. 2013 , organization=

    2013

  141. [149]

    Technometrics , volume=

    Hidden Markov models for speech recognition , author=. Technometrics , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  142. [150]

    IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=

    Neural network-based face detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  143. [151]

    Face detection with the faster

    Jiang, Huaizu and Learned-Miller, Erik , booktitle=. Face detection with the faster. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  144. [152]

    Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems , pages=

    Wide & deep learning for recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems , pages=

  145. [153]

    , author=

    Deep Matrix Factorization Models for Recommender Systems. , author=. IJCAI , volume=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  146. [154]

    Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Social Media , year=

    Forecasting the presence and intensity of hostility on Instagram using linguistic and social features , author=. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Social Media , year=

  147. [155]

    Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) , volume=

    The movielens datasets: History and context , author=. Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  148. [156]

    Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

    Neural factorization machines for sparse predictive analytics , author=. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

  149. [157]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications , volume=

    A cascade-hybrid music recommender system for mobile services based on musical genre classification and personality diagnosis , author=. Multimedia Tools and Applications , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  150. [158]

    Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages=

    Mind: A large-scale dataset for news recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages=

  151. [159]

    Proceedings of the 2011 Visual Information Communication-International Symposium , pages=

    Sfviz: interest-based friends exploration and recommendation in social networks , author=. Proceedings of the 2011 Visual Information Communication-International Symposium , pages=

    2011

  152. [160]

    Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

    Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms , author=. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

  153. [161]

    Annals of Operations Research , volume=

    Neighbor selection for user-based collaborative filtering using covering-based rough sets , author=. Annals of Operations Research , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  154. [162]

    IEICE transactions on fundamentals of electronics, communications and computer sciences , volume=

    Fast local algorithms for large scale nonnegative matrix and tensor factorizations , author=. IEICE transactions on fundamentals of electronics, communications and computer sciences , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  155. [163]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07555 , year=

    Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07555 , year=

    1901 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  157. [165]

    Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    Popularity Bias in Ranking and Recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , pages=

    2019

  158. [166]

    RecSys 2014 Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS 2014) , pages=

    De-biasing user preference ratings in recommender systems , author=. RecSys 2014 Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS 2014) , pages=. 2014 , organization=

    2014

  159. [167]

    Information Systems Research , volume=

    Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects , author=. Information Systems Research , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  160. [168]

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , volume=

    The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information , author=. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  161. [169]

    The International Journal of Press/Politics , volume=

    Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys , author=. The International Journal of Press/Politics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  162. [170]

    Sage Open , volume=

    How many people live in political bubbles on social media? Evidence from linked survey and Twitter data , author=. Sage Open , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  163. [171]

    Social Science Computer Review , volume=

    Who is exposed to news? It depends on how you measure: Examining self-reported versus behavioral news exposure measures , author=. Social Science Computer Review , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  164. [172]

    , author=

    Analysis of User Behavior in Interfaces with Recommended Items: An Eye-tracking Study. , author=. IntRS@ RecSys , pages=

  165. [173]

    Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    A cross-cultural user evaluation of product recommender interfaces , author=. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    2008

  166. [174]

    , author=

    Does the User Have A Theory of the Recommender? A Pilot Study. , author=. IntRS@ RecSys , pages=

  167. [175]

    Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Combining text summarization and aspect-based sentiment analysis of users' reviews to justify recommendations , author=. Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  168. [176]

    Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    Impact of item consumption on assessment of recommendations in user studies , author=. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  169. [177]

    Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    User-centric evaluation of session-based recommendations for an automated radio station , author=. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  170. [178]

    Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

  171. [179]

    Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    A pragmatic procedure to support the user-centric evaluation of recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

  172. [180]

    1993 , publisher=

    The adaptive decision maker , author=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  173. [181]

    Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    Offline and online evaluation of news recommender systems at swissinfo.ch , author=. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems , pages=

  174. [182]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  175. [183]

    ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning , year =

    Lars Buitinck and Gilles Louppe and Mathieu Blondel and Fabian Pedregosa and Andreas Mueller and Olivier Grisel and Vlad Niculae and Peter Prettenhofer and Alexandre Gramfort and Jaques Grobler and Robert Layton and Jake VanderPlas and Arnaud Joly and Brian Holt and Ga. ECML P...

  176. [184]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13844 , year=

    User-controllable Recommendation Against Filter Bubbles , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13844 , year=

    arXiv

  177. [185]

    Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing , pages=

    Movieexplorer: building an interactive exploration tool from ratings and latent taste spaces , author=. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing , pages=

  178. [186]

    International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies , pages=

    User control in recommender systems: Overview and interaction challenges , author=. International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  179. [187]

    23rd international conference on intelligent user interfaces , pages=

    Beyond the ranked list: User-driven exploration and diversification of social recommendation , author=. 23rd international conference on intelligent user interfaces , pages=

  180. [188]

    Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing , pages=

    The relation between user intervention and user satisfaction for information recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing , pages=

  181. [189]

    Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    Each to his own: how different users call for different interaction methods in recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

  182. [190]

    Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management , pages=

    Meta-recommendation systems: user-controlled integration of diverse recommendations , author=. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management , pages=

  183. [191]

    ACM SIGIR 2001 workshop on recommender systems , volume=

    Beyond algorithms: An HCI perspective on recommender systems , author=. ACM SIGIR 2001 workshop on recommender systems , volume=. 2001 , organization=

    2001

  184. [192]

    Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

    Multimodal dialog system: Generating responses via adaptive decoders , author=. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

  185. [193]

    The 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval , pages=

    Conversational recommender system , author=. The 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval , pages=

  186. [194]

    User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , volume=

    Critiquing-based recommenders: survey and emerging trends , author=. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  187. [195]

    Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management , pages=

    Counterfactual explainable recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management , pages=

  188. [196]

    Foundations and Trends

    Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives , author=. Foundations and Trends. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  189. [197]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Probabilistic matrix factorization , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  190. [198]

    Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Field-aware factorization machines for CTR prediction , author=. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  191. [199]

    Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining , pages=

    Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining , pages=

  192. [200]

    ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations , author=. ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  193. [201]

    Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

    Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

  194. [202]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Explainable recommendation through attentive multi-view learning , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  195. [203]

    Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Interpretable convolutional neural networks with dual local and global attention for review rating prediction , author=. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  196. [204]

    Social Network Analysis and Mining , volume=

    Social recommendation: a review , author=. Social Network Analysis and Mining , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  197. [205]

    The world wide web conference , pages=

    Graph neural networks for social recommendation , author=. The world wide web conference , pages=

  198. [206]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04247 , year=

    DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04247 , year=

    arXiv

  199. [207]

    Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

    Predicting clicks: estimating the click-through rate for new ads , author=. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web , pages=

  200. [208]

    2010 , publisher=

    Marketing metrics: The definitive guide to measuring marketing performance , author=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  201. [209]

    International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction , pages=

    User behavior and awareness of filter bubbles in social media , author=. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  202. [210]

    Recommender systems handbook , pages=

    Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends , author=. Recommender systems handbook , pages=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  203. [211]

    Data Mining , DOI=

    Rajaraman, Anand and Ullman, Jeffrey David , year=. Data Mining , DOI=. Mining of Massive Datasets , publisher=

  204. [212]

    Neurocomputing , volume=

    Backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent method , author=. Neurocomputing , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  205. [213]

    Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Ubiquitous information management and communication , pages=

    Addressing cold-start problem in recommendation systems , author=. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Ubiquitous information management and communication , pages=

  206. [214]

    ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Calibrated recommendations , author=. ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  207. [215]

    Expert systems with applications , volume=

    Which App? A recommender system of applications in markets: Implementation of the service for monitoring users’ interaction , author=. Expert systems with applications , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  208. [216]

    Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

    Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)

  209. [217]

    Classification Problem Solving

    Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  210. [218]

    , title =

    Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

    1980

  211. [219]

    New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

    Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science

  212. [220]

    Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

    Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

    1984 doi

  213. [221]

    and Rennels, Glenn R

    Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

  214. [222]

    Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

    Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

  215. [223]

    Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

    Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

  216. [224]

    The Engineering of Qualitative Models

    Clancey, William J. The Engineering of Qualitative Models

  217. [225]

    2017 , eprint=

    Attention Is All You Need , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  218. [226]

    Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

    NASA. Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.