Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 182 references

PRIME-SVR: Physics-infoRmed Implicit Multi-Echo Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction for Fetal T2 mapping

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a self-supervised neural reconstruction that couples multi-echo volumes through a Bloch-equation T2-decay regularizer yields the first submillimeter fetal brain T2 maps at 0.55 T and cuts acquisition from 15 to 5 minu

desk verdict Useful multi-echo SVR with real in-vivo data, but T2 'accuracy' claims are self-referential and need an independent standard. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20136 v1 pith:442LNDI7 submitted 2026-07-22 physics.med-ph cs.AI

Busra Bulut , Maik Dannecker , Thomas Sanchez , Sara Neves Silva , Steven Jia , Jean-Baptiste Ledoux , Leo Pomar , Joanna Sichitiu
show 9 more authors
Yvan Gomez Meriam Koob Vincent Dunet Maria Deprez Guillaume Auzias Francois Rousseau Jana Hutter Daniel Rueckert Meritxell Bach Cuadra
This is my paper
classification physics.med-phcs.AI
keywords fetalbrainMRIslice-to-volumereconstructionimplicitneuralrepresentationT2mappingmulti-echoBlochequationregularizationlow-fieldself-supervisedlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to make quantitative fetal brain T2 mapping clinically practical by reconstructing high-resolution volumes jointly across multiple echo times instead of reconstructing each echo independently. It argues that a single continuous neural volume shared across TEs, plus a physics-based regularizer that forces every voxel's log-signal to lie in the mono-exponential T2-decay subspace, gives sharper, more anatomically accurate reconstructions at late echo times and low field strength, where standard slice-to-volume reconstruction fails. A sympathetic reader would care because T2 is a protocol- and center-independent biomarker of fetal brain maturation, and the method is self-supervised, so it works across scanners, field strengths, and non-clinical echo times without retraining. The paper reports the first 0.8 mm isotropic T2 maps of the fetal brain at 0.55 T, and it shows the acquisition can be shortened from 15 to 10 or 5 minutes while keeping T2 errors within 1.7–2.3%.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is a subspace projection derived from the Bloch equations. For three echo times, the vector of log-intensities y(x) = [log V_1(x), log V_2(x), log V_3(x)] should lie in the 2D column space of D = [[1, TE_1], [1, TE_2], [1, TE_3]] if each voxel decays as M0 exp(-TE/T2). The regularizer computes ||(P - I)y(x)||^2, with P the orthogonal projector P = D(D^T D)^{-1}D^T, and penalizes any deviation, so the shared volume network is pulled toward physically consistent T2 decay. The same P - I matrix is precomputed, so the cost is negligible. An adaptive weight raises this coupling for stacks flagged as low quality, strengthening the prior exactly when data are most corrupted.

What would settle it

Use a phantom with known T2 values spanning the fetal range (roughly 200–400 ms), scanned with the same single-shot fast spin-echo multi-echo protocol at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, with and without simulated slice motion. If PRIME-SVR's T2 values drift by more than the quoted 1.7–2.3% when slice thickness, refocusing angles, or the number of stacks are changed, or if they deviate systematically from a reference multi-echo spin-echo measurement, the mono-exponential subspace assumption and its adaptive weighting are the cause.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that slice-to-volume reconstruction can be done jointly across echo times by representing the high-resolution volume as a continuous function of 3D coordinates that outputs intensities for all TEs, and by regularizing that function so that, at every point, the log-signal across TEs lies in the plane spanned by a constant and the echo time (the mono-exponential Bloch decay). With a second network estimating per-slice motion, intensity, and outlier weights, this fully self-supervised model reconstructs late-echo volumes that single-echo methods cannot handle and produces T2 maps directly from the decay fit. On 13 fetuses at two centers, 1.5 T and 0.55 T, the paper reports

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the signal at each reconstructed voxel decays as a single exponential with one T2 value, unaffected by the way the fast MRI sequence excites each slice; if that is wrong, the cross-echo coupling will pull the reconstruction toward a biased T2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Joint multi-echo reconstruction succeeds at late echo times and at 0.55 T, where single-echo SVR and T2 fitting previously failed, producing the first 0.8 mm isotropic T2 maps of the fetal brain at 0.55 T.
  • Because the volume network is shared across TEs, data from all TEs contribute to every reconstructed volume, so fewer stacks per TE are needed: T2 error stays within 1.7% in white and deep gray matter with two stacks per TE, and within 2.3% with one stack per TE for high-quality acquisitions.
  • The approach cuts the multi-echo acquisition from 15 minutes to 10 or 5 minutes, reducing a major practical barrier to routine quantitative fetal MRI.
  • Cross-TE structural consistency improves by 14% and reconstruction sharpness by 47% relative to standard single-TE slice-to-volume reconstruction, with lower residual T2 fit error.
  • The method is fully self-supervised and does not require training data at specific echo times, so it can be applied at non-clinical TEs and different field strengths without retraining.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same subspace-projection regularizer could be extended to a multi-exponential or extended-phase-graph signal model, which would address the paper's own stated limitation that the simple mono-exponential fit overestimates T2 because slice-profile effects are unmodeled.
  • Editorial inference: the quality-adaptive weighting scheme suggests a general recipe for physics-informed self-supervised reconstruction—use the physical prior more aggressively when the data are degraded and back off when the data are clean—which could transfer to T1 or T2* mapping and to other motion-corrupted quantitative imaging.
  • Editorial inference: the ability to reconstruct with one stack per TE implies acquisition protocols could be redesigned around fewer, faster stacks spread across echo times rather than many stacks at a single contrast; a prospective study could test whether 5-minute protocols preserve the maturational T2 trajectories the paper expects in white matter.
  • Editorial inference: because the volume representation is continuous and resolution-agnostic, the same framework should apply to other moving organs with quantitative mapping, such as musculoskeletal T2 or cardiac T1 mapping, with the caveat that non-rigid motion would need to be modeled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. PRIME-SVR proposes a self-supervised implicit neural representation (INR) framework for joint multi-echo slice-to-volume reconstruction of fetal brain MRI, with a second network estimating slice-specific degradations and a Bloch-equation-derived regularization coupling the reconstructed log-signal across echo times. The method is evaluated on 39 in vivo acquisitions (13 subjects × 3 TEs) from two centers, two vendors, and two field strengths, and compared against NeSVoR and SVRTK. The authors report improved sharpness, anatomical consistency, and cross-TE coherence, enable reconstruction at late TEs and at 0.55 T, produce T2 maps where per-TE SVR fails, and claim that reduced input data (2 or 1 stacks per TE) yields T2 errors within 1.7–2.3% of the full-data reconstruction, corresponding to acquisition time reductions from 15 to 5–10 minutes.

Significance. If the quantitative claims were supported, this would be a substantial contribution: it would make fetal T2 mapping practical at low field, remove the dependence on per-TE SVR pipelines, and reduce acquisition time. The paper's reconstruction-quality evidence is generally plausible: the multi-echo INR with learned slice parameters is a sensible extension of NeSVoR, the two-center, two-field-strength dataset is a genuine strength, and the reported improvements in SSIM, sharpness, and cross-TE edge consistency are internally consistent with qualitative examples. However, the central quantitative T2 accuracy claims rest on a self-referential evaluation: the reduced-data 'accuracy' is measured against the method's own full-data reconstruction, and the Bloch regularizer actively shapes the T2 values being evaluated. The paper also openly acknowledges that the mono-exponential model overestimates T2 because slice-profile effects are not modeled. These issues do not invalidate the reconstruction method, but they do invalidate the paper's present wording that PRIME-SVR 'preserves T2 accuracy within 1.7%' and 'enables quantitative T2 mapping' as an established measurement. The manuscript ne

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.3, Table 4] The central quantitative claim — T2 error within 1.7% for 2 stacks/TE and 2.3% for 1 stack/TE — is computed as the mean absolute difference between T2 maps reconstructed from reduced data and T2 maps reconstructed from the full three stacks per TE using the same PRIME-SVR pipeline. This is a consistency measure, not an accuracy measure. Because the full-data reference itself contains the same network, the same Bloch regularizer, and the same T2 fitting procedure, the errors cannot capture systematic bias. The abstract and Section 7.3 therefore overstate the result by calling it 'T2 accuracy'. The authors should either validate against an independent T2 standard (phantom, adult reference, EPG-based dictionary fitting, or an independent reconstruction pipeline without the Bloch prior) or explicitly restrict the claim to self-consistency under data reduction.
  2. [Section 3.4, Eq. (5); Table 6] The Bloch regularizer projects each voxel's log-signal onto the two-dimensional column space of D = [[1, TE_i]], which is the same mono-exponential model later used to estimate T2 in Section 3.5. The regularizer therefore does not independently verify T2; it actively enforces the assumed decay shape. Table 6 shows the effect is numerically large: changing the fixed regularization weight from 0.1 to 20 shifts mean WM T2 from 353.8 ms to 377.4 ms and DGM T2 from 260.2 ms to 281.8 ms. The adaptive weighting keeps values close to the alpha=0.1 case, but this does not remove the circularity: the scale of the reported T2 values is partly determined by the prior rather than by measured signal. The authors should quantify the residual influence of the Bloch prior on the final T2 maps, for example by reporting the difference between T2 from the full PRIME-SVR reconstruction and T2 from a version
  3. [Section 7.4; Section 7.2] The authors concede that the simple mono-exponential model overestimates T2 because the SST2w slice profile is not modeled, and that EPG-based dictionary fitting would be required to correct the bias. This concession is in direct tension with the abstract and conclusion presenting the produced maps as quantitatively accurate T2 maps. The discussion in Section 7.2 also invokes the low residual fitting error as evidence that reconstruction quality is the main bottleneck; however, a low residual is expected when both the regularizer and the fitting procedure assume the same mono-exponential model. The paper should either correct the known slice-profile bias before presenting T2 values, or clearly frame the reported T2 values as demonstrations of feasibility and internal consistency, not as validated quantitative biomarker measurements.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 7.3] The 15-minute acquisition time and the reduction to 10 or 5 minutes are quoted in the abstract, but the mapping from stacks per TE to acquisition minutes is never explicitly derived in the methods. Please specify the per-stack acquisition time or otherwise justify the time figures.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (2)] The notation NTE is used inconsistently (N_TE vs NTE). Also, the line 'For clarity of exposition, more information are in the appendix' is a grammatical error and should be rephrased.
  3. [Section 6.3, Table 4 caption] The caption says subjects with q̄ < 0.9 are discarded, but the sample sizes differ across rows (6 vs 5, 5 vs 4). Please explicitly state the exclusion counts and whether the same subjects are used for the 2-stack and 1-stack conditions at each field strength.
  4. [Section 5.2, Experiment 2] The comparison of T2 values against SVRTK is useful as a method comparison, but SVRTK is not a ground truth. Please make clear in the text that Table 3 reports agreement between two reconstruction pipelines, not accuracy of either one.
  5. [Section 4.2] Training is stopped at epoch 100 with no explicit stopping criterion. Given that the Bloch regularization and adaptive weighting influence the result, a sentence justifying this fixed epoch choice and its stability across runs would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Quantitative T2 claims are self-referential: reduced-data 'T2 accuracy' is measured against PRIME-SVR's own full-data output, and the Bloch regularizer imposes the same mono-exponential subspace later used for T2 fitting; reconstruction-quality comparisons remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 6.3, Table 4; Abstract]
    "Table 4 summarizes the reconstruction similarity metrics and the errors in T2 estimation within WM and DGM obtained using reduced numbers of input stacks per TE, with the HR volumes reconstructed from 3 stacks per TE (full data) serving as the reference."

    The reduced-data T2 error is computed against the full-data output of the same PRIME-SVR pipeline, not against an independent T2 standard. The abstract's 'T2 accuracy within 1.7%' is therefore a self-consistency statistic between two runs of the same network with the same Bloch regularizer, not a validated accuracy bound. This is the only evidence for the central acceleration claim (15 to 10 or 5 minutes), so that claim reduces to internal reproducibility rather than quantitative correctness.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.4 Eq. (5) and Section 3.5]
    "The Bloch regularization computed on a set X of coordinates becomes R_T2 (V 1, . . . , V NT E ) = 1/|X| Σ x∈X ∥(P−I)y(x)∥ 2 2 (5) ... We use the same closed-form approximation than in Bloch regularization to initialize the T2 and M0."

    The regularizer projects each voxel's log-signal onto the column space of D=[1, TE_i], and the T2 estimator then uses exactly that same subspace and closed-form approximation. Thus the reported T2 maps are forced by construction to agree with the mono-exponential prior; the prior cannot be falsified by the data. Table 6 makes this concrete: raising the regularization weight from 0.1 to 20 shifts WM T2 from 353.8 to 377.4 ms and DGM T2 from 260.2 to 281.8 ms, showing the prior directly sets the T2 scale. Presenting these as quantitative measurements, when Section 7.4 concedes the mono-exponential model overestimates T2 due to unmodeled slice-profile effects, is circular in the accuracy claim rather than in the reconstruction algorithm itself.

full rationale

The core INR reconstruction (shared SIREN, slice acquisition model, loss Eq. 6) is self-contained and its reconstruction-quality improvements (SSIM, AES, NMI, Edge Dice) are evaluated against independent baselines, so those claims are not circular. However, the quantitative T2 story has two self-referential links. First, Experiment 3 defines 'T2 error' as the difference between reduced-data PRIME-SVR T2 maps and full-data PRIME-SVR T2 maps; no phantom, EPG dictionary, or other independent T2 reference is used, so the abstract's 1.7-2.3% 'accuracy' figure is internal consistency. Second, the Bloch regularizer (Eq. 5) constrains log-signal to the same [1, TE] subspace from which T2 is later fitted (Section 3.5), and the weight ablation shows T2 values move monotonically with regularization strength. Therefore the quantitative values are partially produced by the prior, not independently measured. The paper's own limitations (Section 7.4) acknowledge the mono-exponential model overestimates T2 because the SST2w slice profile is unmodeled and EPG dictionary fitting would be required. This does not invalidate the reconstruction contribution, but it means the headline quantitative-mapping and acceleration-accuracy claims are not supported as stated. No load-bearing self-citation circularity was found; the prior workshop paper is cited only as preliminary evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central T2 maps are co-determined by the hand-set Bloch weight and the assumed monoexponential model; no new physical entities are introduced. The paper relies on standard INR capacity assumptions and a fixed Gaussian PSF from prior literature.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha(q_bar) adaptive Bloch regularization weight = 10–30 if q_bar<0.9 or <3 stacks/TE; 0–1 if q_bar>=0.9
    Hand-set schedule in Section 3.4.1. Table 6 shows T2 estimates shift monotonically with alpha (WM 353.8→377.4 ms, DGM 260.2→281.8 ms), so the central T2 values depend on this choice.
  • gamma (log-barrier weight on outlier coefficients) = not specified (stated only as 0<gamma<1)
    Controls the strength of the outlier-weight barrier in Eq. (6); no numeric value or sensitivity analysis is given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mono-exponential Bloch decay V_i(x)=M0(x)exp(-TE_i/T2(x))
    Used in Eq. (2), the Bloch regularizer Eq. (5), and the T2 fitting. The paper acknowledges in Section 7.4 that this simplified model overestimates T2 because it ignores the SST2w slice profile.
  • domain assumption Anisotropic Gaussian PSF with covariance fixed from Rousseau et al. 2006
    Supplementary Section 9.1 defines the PSF covariance with fixed factors (1.2r/2.355 etc.); the PSF is assumed known rather than estimated per acquisition.
  • domain assumption SIREN is sufficiently expressive to approximate the continuous volume
    Section 3.1 explicitly states: 'We assume that this architecture is sufficiently expressive to approximate V with high accuracy.'
  • domain assumption Slice motion is rigid and slice-specific; bias/scale are the only other degradations
    Eq. (1) models only rigid T_j, global scaling C_j, and bias field; no non-rigid motion or through-plane deformation is considered.
  • domain assumption FetMRQC quality score q captures motion artifacts and signal dropouts
    The adaptive alpha schedule in Section 3.4.1 is keyed to q_bar, so if FetMRQC is miscalibrated on multi-TE low-field data, the physics coupling is applied incorrectly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PRIME-SVR: Physics-infoRmed Implicit Multi-Echo Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction for Fetal T2 mapping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/442LNDI7

@misc{pith2026260720136,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PRIME-SVR: Physics-infoRmed Implicit Multi-Echo Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction for Fetal T2 mapping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/442LNDI7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20136}
}
read the original abstract

Slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) is the standard method for obtaining high-resolution (HR) 3D fetal brain volumes from motion-corrupted 2D MRI slice stacks acquired in multiple orientations. Existing SVR methods are optimized and validated only for clinical-range echo times (TEs), limiting their use at non-clinical TEs and making them incompatible with quantitative T2 mapping, a protocol- and center-independent biomarker of fetal brain maturation requiring HR reconstructions across multiple TEs. We present PRIME-SVR, the first implicit neural representation (INR) framework for joint HR reconstruction from multi-echo MRI. A single fully connected network models a continuous function from spatial coordinates to signal intensities across TEs, while a second network estimates slice-specific acquisition degradations. Cross-TE coherence is enforced via a Bloch equation-derived regularization penalizing deviations from expected T2 decay, with adaptive weighting that strengthens coupling for degraded stacks. The method is fully self-supervised. We validate PRIME-SVR on 39 in vivo fetal acquisitions (13 subjects x 3 TEs) from two centers, two vendors, and two field strengths (1.5 T and 0.55 T). Compared to state-of-the-art SVR, PRIME-SVR improves reconstruction sharpness by 47%, anatomical accuracy by 30%, and cross-TE structural consistency by 14%. It enables reconstruction at late TEs previously inaccessible to SVR, yielding the first 0.8 mm isotropic T2 maps at 0.55 T and the first T2 maps derived from INR-based SVR. PRIME-SVR also accelerates quantitative imaging by reducing the data needed for multi-TE reconstruction, cutting acquisition from 15 to 10 minutes while keeping T2 accuracy within 1.7% in white and deep gray matter, or to 5 minutes with a mean T2 error of 2.3% for high-quality acquisitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20136 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed method PRIME-SVR. Multi-echo Low Resolu￾tion stacks are acquired across orthogonal orientations and TEs; a per-slice quality metric q¯ is estimated. (B) A shared SIREN Vθ maps spatial coordinates to HR intensities at each TE, while fSMθ predicts slice-specific acquisition parameters. Training combines a data-fidelity term with a Bloch regularization, adaptively weighted by q¯. (C) Once train… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the dataset Pre-processing. All stacks were denoised using the non-local means algorithm implemented in Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) (Avants et al., 2009), based on the method introduced in Manjón et al. (2010). Then, fetal brain masking was performed using FET-BET (Faghihpirayesh et al., 2024). In cases where the automated masking failed, manual corrections using ITK￾Snap (Yushkevich et al., 2016… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview for 4 subjects, the HR reconstructions (0.8mm isotropic resolution) at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of the HR reconstructions from PRIME-SVR across all subjects, along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: T2 distribution for each subject, obtained using PRIME SVR (blue) and SVRTK [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstructions obtained using 2 stacks/TE remain visually similar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HR reconstructions obtained with PRIME-SVR under reduced input data con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

182 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Leslie Lamport, : a document preparation system, Addison Wesley, Massachusetts, 2nd edition, 1994

    1994

  2. [3]

    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , author =

    Conditional. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2024.3385504 , number =

    arXiv 2024

  3. [4]

    Glaszner, Lukas and Zach, Martin , year =. Bigger. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2501.07376 , abstract =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.07376

  4. [5]

    Pediatric Radiology , author =

    Biometry and volumetry in multi-centric fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging: assessing the bias of super-resolution reconstruction , volume =. Pediatric Radiology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00247-025-06347-7 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00247-025-06347-7 2025

  5. [6]

    FetalDiffusion: Pose-Controllable 3D Fetal MRI Synthesis with Conditional Diffusion Model

    Zhang, Molin and Golland, Polina and Grant, Patricia Ellen and Adalsteinsson, Elfar , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2404.00132 , abstract =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.00132

  6. [8]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    A. Scientific Reports , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10335-4 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10335-4 2022

  7. [9]

    and Cheng, Yu-Chung N

    Brown, Robert W. and Cheng, Yu-Chung N. and Haacke, E. Mark and Thompson, Michael R. and Venkatesan, Ramesh , year =. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design , isbn =. doi:10.1002/9781118633953 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/9781118633953

  8. [10]

    T2 relaxation values in the developing preterm brain , volume =. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology , author =. 2003 , pmid =

    2003

Show all 182 references
  1. [11]

    Simulation-

    De Dumast, Priscille and Sanchez, Thomas and Lajous, Hélène and Bach Cuadra, Meritxell , editor =. Simulation-. Medical. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  2. [12]

    and Asif, M

    Shoushtari, Shirin and Liu, Jiaming and Chandler, Edward P. and Asif, M. Salman and Kamilov, Ulugbek S. , year =. Prior. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.00133 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  3. [13]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Model‐based super‐resolution reconstruction of. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.27981 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  4. [14]

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Joint reconstruction of multiecho. Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.03.008 , language =

    2011 doi

  5. [15]

    Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics , author =

    Model-based super-resolution reconstruction with joint motion estimation for improved quantitative. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102071 , language =

    2022

  6. [16]

    and Rueckert, Daniel and Wiestler, Benedikt , year =

    McGinnis, Julian and Shit, Suprosanna and Li, Hongwei Bran and Sideri-Lampretsa, Vasiliki and Graf, Robert and Dannecker, Maik and Pan, Jiazhen and Ansó, Nil Stolt and Mühlau, Mark and Kirschke, Jan S. and Rueckert, Daniel and Wiestler, Benedikt , year =. Single-subject. doi:1...

    doi arXiv

  7. [17]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2308.04079 , abstract =

    Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimkühler, Thomas and Drettakis, George , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2308.04079 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  8. [19]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics , author =

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding , volume =. ACM Transactions on Graphics , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1145/3528223.3530127 , abstract =

    2022

  9. [20]

    Wang, Yinsong and Fletcher, Thomas and Luo, Xinzhe and Dineen, Aine Travers and Cusack, Rhodri and Qin, Chen , year =. Self-. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2601.22990 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  10. [21]

    Fast and

    Dannecker, Maik and Jia, Steven and Stolt-Ansó, Nil and Girard, Nadine and Auzias, Guillaume and Rousseau, François and Rueckert, Daniel , year =. Fast and. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2512.11624 , abstract =

    doi

  11. [22]

    and Ashburner, John , year =

    Chalcroft, Liam and Crinion, Jenny and Price, Cathy J. and Ashburner, John , year =. Domain-. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2412.03318 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  12. [23]

    2024 , pages =

    Medical Image Analysis , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103282 , language =

    2024

  13. [25]

    Pediatric Radiology , author =

    Fetal. Pediatric Radiology , author =. doi:10.1007/s00247-004-1246-0 , language =

    doi

  14. [27]

    Physical Review , author =

    The. Physical Review , author =. 1946 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.474 , language =

    1946 doi

  15. [28]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) , author =

    The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment , volume =. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) , author =. 1976 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0022-2364(76)90233-X , language =

    1969 doi

  16. [29]

    Jia, Steven and Mercier, Chloé and Pron, Alexandre and Girard, Nadine and Auzias, Guillaume and Rousseau, François , editor =. Joint. Perinatal,. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  17. [32]

    The British Journal of Radiology , author =

    Retrospective motion correction in foetal. The British Journal of Radiology , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1259/bjr.20220071 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  18. [33]

    Ellen and Golland, Polina and Iglesias, Juan Eugenio and Adalsteinsson, Elfar , year =

    Xu, Junshen and Moyer, Daniel and Grant, P. Ellen and Golland, Polina and Iglesias, Juan Eugenio and Adalsteinsson, Elfar , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2206.10802 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  19. [34]

    American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =

    Apparent. American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5222 , language =

    2017 doi

  20. [35]

    American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =

    Normative. American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1661 , language =

    2009 doi

  21. [36]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    An efficient sequence for fetal brain imaging at. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.27012 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  22. [37]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Preliminary. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.28195 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  23. [39]

    2004 , pages =

    American Journal of Roentgenology , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820367 , language =

    2004 doi

  24. [40]

    Prenatal Diagnosis , author =

    Fetal. Prenatal Diagnosis , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1002/pd.5579 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  25. [41]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    T2* quantification using multi-echo gradient echo sequences: a comparative study of different readout gradients , volume =. Scientific Reports , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28265-0 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  26. [42]

    Placenta , author =

    Exploring the role of a time-efficient. Placenta , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2023.05.014 , language =

    2023 doi

  27. [43]

    Placenta , author =

    T2* weighted fetal. Placenta , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2022.12.002 , language =

    2023 doi

  28. [44]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =

    The. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , author =. 1936 , pages =. doi:10.1073/pnas.22.4.210 , language =

    1936 doi

  29. [46]

    2017 , pages =

    Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1002/uog.17412 , language =

    2017 doi

  30. [47]

    2014 , pages =

    BioMed Research International , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1155/2014/312142 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  31. [48]

    American Journal of Roentgenology , author =

    Fetal anatomy revealed with fast. American Journal of Roentgenology , author =. 1996 , pages =. doi:10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819380 , language =

    1996 doi

  32. [49]

    Clinical Nephrology , author =

    Treatment of renal hypertension , volume =. Clinical Nephrology , author =. 1975 , keywords =

    1975

  33. [50]

    NeuroImage , author =

    An efficient total variation algorithm for super-resolution in fetal brain. NeuroImage , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.018 , language =

    2015 doi

  34. [52]

    Zalevskyi, Vladyslav and Sanchez, Thomas and Kaandorp, Misha and Roulet, Margaux and Fajardo-Rojas, Diego and Li, Liu and Hutter, Jana and Li, Hongwei Bran and Barkovich, Matthew and Ji, Hui and Wilhelmi, Luca and Dändliker, Aline and Steger, Céline and Koob, Mériam and Gomez,...

    doi

  35. [53]

    Quantitative. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5668 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  36. [54]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Characterizing. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/mrm.30193 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  37. [55]

    Neuroradiology , author =

    The premature brain: imaging, anatomy and uncertain outcome , volume =. Neuroradiology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1244-8 , language =

    2013 doi

  38. [56]

    Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology , author =

    Fundamentals of the. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1093/jnen/nlab024 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  39. [57]

    Progress in Neurobiology , author =

    The impact of (ab)normal maternal environment on cortical development , volume =. Progress in Neurobiology , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102054 , language =

    2021

  40. [58]

    Mapping the

    Cachia, Arnaud and Mangin, Jean-François and Dubois, Jessica , year =. Mapping the. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2504.21406 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  41. [59]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2511.14897 , abstract =

    Indrakanti, Pranav and Simpson, Ivor , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2511.14897 , abstract =

    doi

  42. [60]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2511.13232 , abstract =

    Abed, Malek Al and Demir, Sebiha and Groteklaes, Anne and Germani, Elodie and Faghihroohi, Shahrooz and Sabir, Hemmen and Albarqouni, Shadi , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2511.13232 , abstract =

    doi

  43. [61]

    Cerebral

    Vanderweyen, Davy and Seifeldine, Kassem and Philibert, Maude and Wilk, Christine and Ouellet, Annie and Whittingstall, Kevin , month = oct, year =. Cerebral. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7715526/v1 , abstract =

    doi

  44. [62]

    and Kofler, Florian , year =

    Durrer, Alicia and Bieder, Florentin and Friedrich, Paul and Menze, Bjoern and Cattin, Philippe C. and Kofler, Florian , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2507.13146 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  45. [63]

    , year =

    Friedrich, Paul and Wolleb, Julia and Bieder, Florentin and Durrer, Alicia and Cattin, Philippe C. , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2402.19043 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  46. [64]

    and Puonti, Oula and Sorby-Adams, Annabel and Kimberly, W

    Aguila, Ana Lawry and Zemlyanker, Dina and Cheng, You and Das, Sudeshna and Alexander, Daniel C. and Puonti, Oula and Sorby-Adams, Annabel and Kimberly, W. Taylor and Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , year =. Deep generative priors for. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.15119 , abstract =

    doi

  47. [65]

    Developmental Neuroscience , author =

    Ex vivo. Developmental Neuroscience , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1159/000542276 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  48. [66]

    Multimodal imaging of human fetal brain development at the mesoscopic scale using 11.7

    Arcamone, Lucas and Poupon, Cyril and Adle-Biassette, Homa and Khung-Savatovsky, Suonavy and Alison, Marianne and Dubois, Jessica and Hertz-Pannier, Lucie and Leprince, Yann , month = sep, year =. Multimodal imaging of human fetal brain development at the mesoscopic scale usin...

    2025 doi

  49. [67]

    NeuroImage , author =

    Conditional deep generative normative modeling for structural and developmental anomaly detection in the fetal brain , volume =. NeuroImage , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121442 , language =

    2025

  50. [69]

    , year =

    Saragadam, Vishwanath and LeJeune, Daniel and Tan, Jasper and Balakrishnan, Guha and Veeraraghavan, Ashok and Baraniuk, Richard G. , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2301.05187 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  51. [70]

    Essakine, Amer and Cheng, Yanqi and Cheng, Chun-Wun and Zhang, Lipei and Deng, Zhongying and Zhu, Lei and Schönlieb, Carola-Bibiane and Aviles-Rivero, Angelica I , year =. Where. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2411.03688 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  52. [71]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2010.07492 , abstract =

    Zhang, Kai and Riegler, Gernot and Snavely, Noah and Koltun, Vladlen , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2010.07492 , abstract =

    2010 doi arXiv

  53. [72]

    2023 , pages =

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TMI.2023.3236216 , abstract =

    2023

  54. [73]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2106.15097 , abstract =

    Wu, Qing and Li, Yuwei and Xu, Lan and Feng, Ruiming and Wei, Hongjiang and Yang, Qing and Yu, Boliang and Liu, Xiaozhao and Yu, Jingyi and Zhang, Yuyao , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2106.15097 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  55. [74]

    Sitzmann, Vincent and Martel, Julien N. P. and Bergman, Alexander W. and Lindell, David B. and Wetzstein, Gordon , month = jun, year =. Implicit. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2006.09661 , abstract =

    2006 doi arXiv

  56. [75]

    Physics-

    Bulut, Busra and Dannecker, Maik and Sanchez, Thomas and Silva, Sara Neves and Zalevskyi, Vladyslav and Jia, Steven and Ledoux, Jean-Baptiste and Auzias, Guillaume and Rousseau, François and Hutter, Jana and Rueckert, Daniel and Cuadra, Meritxell Bach , year =. Physics-. doi:1...

    doi arXiv

  57. [76]

    Frontiers in Neuroscience , author =

    Harmonized. Frontiers in Neuroscience , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.662005 , abstract =

    2021

  58. [77]

    , volume =

    T2 relaxation values in the developing preterm brain. , volume =. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology , author =. 2003 , pages =

    2003

  59. [78]

    2020 , pages =

    T2. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_12 , author =

    2020 doi

  60. [79]

    2021 , pages =

    Quantitative. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87615-9_2 , author =

    2021 doi

  61. [80]

    2022 , pages =

    A. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17117-8_2 , author =

    2022 doi

  62. [81]

    2023 , pages =

    Quantitative. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45544-5_4 , author =

    2023 doi

  63. [82]

    2024 , pages =

    Improving. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72378-0\_41 , author =

    2024 doi

  64. [83]

    Journal of Advanced Research , author =

    Fetal. Journal of Advanced Research , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2013.06.001 , number =

    2014 doi

  65. [84]

    Radiology , author =

    Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain:. Radiology , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336675 , number =

    1988 doi

  66. [85]

    Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Quantitative. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e31821e56d8 , number =

    2010 doi

  67. [86]

    and Sutin, Jason and Stout, Jeffrey N

    Vasung, Lana and Turk, Esra Abaci and Ferradal, Silvina L. and Sutin, Jason and Stout, Jeffrey N. and Ahtam, Banu and Lin, Pei-Yi and Grant, P. Ellen , month = feb, year =. Exploring early human brain development with structural and physiological neuroimaging , volume =. doi:1...

    2018 doi

  68. [87]

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine , author =

    Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound , volume =. Journal of Perinatal Medicine , author =. doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0226 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  69. [88]

    Brain Structure and Function , author =

    Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging , volume =. Brain Structure and Function , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1342-6 , number =

    2017 doi

  70. [89]

    Delineation of early brain development from fetuses to infants with diffusion

    Ouyang, Minhui and Dubois, Jessica and Yu, Qinlin and Mukherjee, Pratik and Huang, Hao , month = jan, year =. Delineation of early brain development from fetuses to infants with diffusion. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.017 , journal =

    2018 doi

  71. [90]

    The Lancet , author =

    Use of. The Lancet , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8 , number =

    2017 doi

  72. [91]

    and Dehaene-Lambertz, G

    Dubois, J. and Dehaene-Lambertz, G. and Kulikova, S. and Poupon, C. and Hüppi, P. S. and Hertz-Pannier, L. , month = sep, year =. The early development of brain white matter:. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044 , journal =

    2013 doi

  73. [93]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    T2 * relaxometry of fetal brain structures using low‐field (0. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.30409 , number =

    2025 doi

  74. [95]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Low‐field. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.26637 , number =

    2019 doi

  75. [96]

    American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =

    Motion-. American Journal of Neuroradiology , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3128 , number =

    2013 doi

  76. [97]

    Journal of Neuroimaging , author =

    Super‐resolution reconstruction of. Journal of Neuroimaging , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1111/jon.12929 , number =

    2022 doi

  77. [98]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Low‐field. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.28408 , number =

    2023 doi

  78. [99]

    Deoni, Sean C. L. and Bruchhage, Muriel M. K. and Beauchemin, Jennifer and Volpe, Alexandra and D'Sa, Viren and Huentelman, Matthew and Williams, Steven C. R. , month = sep, year =. Accessible pediatric neuroimaging using a low field strength. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118...

    2021

  79. [100]

    , month = oct, year =

    Rajagopalan, Vidya and Deoni, Sean and Panigrahy, Ashok and Thomason, Moriah E. , month = oct, year =. Is fetal. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100999 , journal =

    2021

  80. [101]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Fast model‐based. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.27890 , number =

    2019 doi

  81. [102]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Rapid and accurate. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.25156 , number =

    2015 doi

  82. [103]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation , volume =. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.22487 , abstract =

    2010 doi

  83. [104]

    Revisiting the

    Canales-Rodríguez, Erick Jorge and Pizzolato, Marco and Yu, Thomas and Piredda, Gian Franco and Hilbert, Tom and Radua, Joaquim and Kober, Tobias and Thiran, Jean-Philippe , month = dec, year =. Revisiting the. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118582 , journal =

    2021

  84. [105]

    Nature , author =

    Magnetic resonance fingerprinting , volume =. Nature , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1038/nature11971 , number =

    2013 doi

  85. [106]

    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =

    Simple recipe for accurate. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10334-014-0438-3 , number =

    2014 doi

  86. [107]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Accelerating. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.24577 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  87. [108]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Extended phase graphs:. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.24619 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  88. [109]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Accelerating parameter mapping with a locally low rank constraint , volume =. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.25161 , number =

    2015 doi

  89. [110]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    T1 and. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.30281 , number =

    2025 doi

  90. [111]

    and Nunez-Iglesias, Juan and Boulogne, François and Warner, Joshua D

    Walt, Stéfan van der and Schönberger, Johannes L. and Nunez-Iglesias, Juan and Boulogne, François and Warner, Joshua D. and Yager, Neil and Gouillart, Emmanuelle and Yu, Tony , month = jun, year =. scikit-image: image processing in. doi:10.7717/peerj.453 , journal =

    doi

  91. [112]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Quantitative. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.24948 , number =

    2015 doi

  92. [113]

    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =

    Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom , volume =. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10334-019-00775-x , number =

    2020 doi

  93. [114]

    PLOS ONE , author =

    Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of. PLOS ONE , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252966 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  94. [115]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Incorporation of rician noise in the analysis of biexponential transverse relaxation in cartilage using a multiple gradient echo sequence at 3 and 7 tesla , volume =. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.25111 , number =

    2015 doi

  95. [116]

    Hajj, Christian El and Moussaoui, Said and Collewet, Guylaine and Musse, Maja , year =. Multi-. doi:10.1109/TIP.2020.2993114 , journal =

    2020

  96. [117]

    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =

    Relaxation measurements of an. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s10334-023-01086-y , number =

    2023 doi

  97. [118]

    Medical Image Analysis , author =

    A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , volume =. Medical Image Analysis , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6 , number =

    2001 doi

  98. [119]

    2006 , pages =

    NMR in Biomedicine , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1002/nbm.1104 , number =

    2006 doi

  99. [120]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    The rician distribution of noisy mri data , volume =. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340618 , abstract =

    1995 doi

  100. [121]

    and Puonti, Oula and Thielscher, Axel and Leemput, Koen Van and Fischl, Bruce and Dalca, Adrian V

    Billot, Benjamin and Greve, Douglas N. and Puonti, Oula and Thielscher, Axel and Leemput, Koen Van and Fischl, Bruce and Dalca, Adrian V. and Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , month = may, year =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102789 , journal =

    2023

  101. [122]

    NeuroImage , author =

    An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on. NeuroImage , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 , number =

    2006 doi

  102. [123]

    Frontiers in Radiology , author =

    Variability and reproducibility of multi-echo. Frontiers in Radiology , author =. doi:10.3389/fradi.2022.930666 , abstract =

    2022

  103. [124]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Statistical noise analysis in. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.22701 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  104. [125]

    Pediatric Radiology , author =

    Scanner-based real-time three-dimensional brain + body slice-to-volume reconstruction for. Pediatric Radiology , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00247-025-06165-x , abstract =

    2025 doi

  105. [126]

    Ellen and Golland, Polina and Adalsteinsson, Elfar , editor =

    Zhang, Molin and Xu, Junshen and Abaci Turk, Esra and Grant, P. Ellen and Golland, Polina and Adalsteinsson, Elfar , editor =. Enhanced. Medical. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_38 , language =

    2020 doi

  106. [127]

    Self-supervised

    Tan, Junpeng and Zhang, Xin and Lv, Yao and Xu, Xiangmin and Li, Gang , year =. Self-supervised. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.10209 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  107. [128]

    Pathological

    Kaandorp, Misha and Jakab, Andras , collaborator =. Pathological. doi:10.15154/XTH4-AF39 , abstract =

    doi

  108. [129]

    Academic Radiology , author =

    Registration-. Academic Radiology , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2006.05.003 , language =

    2006 doi

  109. [130]

    NeuroImage , author =

    An automated framework for localization, segmentation and super-resolution reconstruction of fetal brain. NeuroImage , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116324 , language =

    2020

  110. [131]

    Medical Image Analysis , author =

    Reconstruction of fetal brain. Medical Image Analysis , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004 , language =

    2012 doi

  111. [132]

    Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , author =

    Measuring and interpreting individual differences in fetal, infant, and toddler neurodevelopment , volume =. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101539 , language =

    2025

  112. [133]

    Frequency-

    Thaker, Darshan and Goyal, Abhishek and Vidal, René , year =. Frequency-. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2411.15295 , abstract =

    doi

  113. [134]

    Cohen, Noa and Manor, Hila and Bahat, Yuval and Michaeli, Tomer , year =. From. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.16047 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  114. [135]

    Medical Image Analysis , author =

    Adaptive diffusion priors for accelerated. Medical Image Analysis , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102872 , language =

    2023

  115. [136]

    and Hein, Matthias , year =

    Morshuis, Jan Nikolas and Schlarmann, Christian and Küstner, Thomas and Baumgartner, Christian F. and Hein, Matthias , year =. Mind the. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2507.00670 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  116. [137]

    Uncertainty

    Yair, Omer and Nehme, Elias and Michaeli, Tomer , year =. Uncertainty. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2312.07804 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  117. [138]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.17472 , abstract =

    Wu, Jiangjie and Chen, Lixuan and Li, Zhenghao and Li, Xin and Ozturk, Saban and Wang, Lihui and Wang, Rongpin and Wei, Hongjiang and Zhang, Yuyao , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.17472 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  118. [139]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    In vivo. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.30094 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  119. [140]

    Gholipour, A and Estroff, J A and Warfield, S K , month = oct, year =. Robust. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , publisher =. doi:10.1109/tmi.2010.2051680 , number =

    2010

  120. [141]

    Rethinking

    Li, Guangyuan and Zhao, Lei and Sun, Jiakai and Lan, Zehua and Zhang, Zhanjie and Chen, Jiafu and Lin, Zhijie and Lin, Huaizhong and Xing, Wei , month = oct, year =. Rethinking. 2023. doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01941 , urldate =

    2023

  121. [142]

    Anatomy-. Lecture. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59861-7_39 , language =

    2020 doi

  122. [143]

    , month = jan, year =

    Glenn, Orit A. , month = jan, year =. Pediatric Radiology , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1459-3 , language =

    doi

  123. [144]

    and Cui, Sophia X

    Ponrartana, Skorn and Nguyen, HaiThuy N. and Cui, Sophia X. and Tian, Ye and Kumar, Prakash and Wood, John C. and Nayak, Krishna S. , month = mar, year =. Low-field 0.55. Pediatric Radiology , publisher =. doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05604-x , abstract =

    doi

  124. [145]

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83008-2 , language =

    Low. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83008-2 , language =

    doi

  125. [146]

    and Uus, Alena and Sousa, Helena S

    Bhattacharya, Suryava and Price, Anthony N. and Uus, Alena and Sousa, Helena S. and Marenzana, Massimo and Colford, Kathleen and Lee, Maggie and Cordero-Grande, Lucilio and Malik, Shaihan J. and Deprez, Maria , booktitle =. Joint reconstruction and motion correction of the fet...

    2025

  126. [147]

    and Gao, Yang and Gerig, Guido , month = aug, year =

    Yushkevich, Paul A. and Gao, Yang and Gerig, Guido , month = aug, year =. 2016 38th. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591443 , urldate =

    2016

  127. [148]

    Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging , volume=

    Evaluating Synthetic Data Generation for Domain Generalization in Fetal Brain MRI Segmentation , author=. Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging , volume=

  128. [149]

    International Workshop on Preterm, Perinatal and Paediatric Image Analysis , pages=

    Assessing data quality on fetal brain MRI reconstruction: a multi-site and multi-rater study , author=. International Workshop on Preterm, Perinatal and Paediatric Image Analysis , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  129. [151]

    1997 , pages =

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910370107 , abstract =

    1997 doi

  130. [152]

    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =

    Optimization of fetal brain. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine , author =. doi:10.1007/s10334-026-01371-6 , abstract =

    doi

  131. [153]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  132. [154]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , author =

    Fast. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TMI.2015.2415453 , number =

    2015

  133. [155]

    Neuroinformatics , author =

    Geometric. Neuroinformatics , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s12021-023-09635-5 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  134. [156]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , author =

    A. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 , number =

    1986

  135. [157]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =

    Quantitative framework for prospective motion correction evaluation , volume =. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1002/mrm.25580 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  136. [158]

    Evaluating the match of image quality metrics with radiological assessment in a dataset with and without motion artifacts , author=. Proc. ISMRM Annu. Meeting , volume=

  137. [159]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

    Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity , author=. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , volume=

  138. [160]

    Ecology , volume=

    Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species , author=. Ecology , volume=

  139. [161]

    International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

    Focusing , author=. International Journal of Computer Vision , year=

  140. [162]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    A normative spatiotemporal. Scientific Reports , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00525-w , abstract =

    2017 doi

  141. [163]

    and Ba, Jimmy , year =

    Kingma, Diederik P. and Ba, Jimmy , year =. Adam:. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1412.6980 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  142. [164]

    2004 , publisher=

    Convex Optimization , author=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  143. [165]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Adaptive non‐local means denoising of. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.22003 , abstract =

    2010 doi

  144. [166]

    Insight Journal , year=

    Advanced normalization tools (ANTS) , author=. Insight Journal , year=

  145. [167]

    IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology , year=

    Fetal-bet: Brain extraction tool for fetal mri , author=. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology , year=

  146. [168]

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    Point spread functions of the. Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.04.017 , language =

    2012 doi

  147. [169]

    , author=

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. , author=. ACM Trans. Graph. , volume=

  148. [170]

    Meta-learning

    Dannecker, Maik and Sanchez, Thomas and Cuadra, Meritxell Bach and Turgut,. Meta-learning. 2025 , note =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2505.09565 , abstract =

    2025 doi arXiv

  149. [171]

    , volume =

    Jiang, Shuzhou and Xue, Hui and Glover, Alan and Rutherford, Mary and Rueckert, Daniel and Hajnal, Joseph V. , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , month = jul, year =. doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.895456 , number =

    2007

  150. [172]

    T2 mapping at 0.55

    Roulet, Margaux and Kebiri, Hamza and Bulut, Busra and Zalevskyi, Vladyslav and Sanchez, Thomas and Ledoux, Jean-Baptiste and Dunet, Vincent and Koob, M\'eriam and Hilbert, Tom and Kober, Tobias and Canales-Rodriguez, Erick J and Cuadra, Meritxell Bach , year =. T2 mapping at ...

    doi

  151. [173]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03688 , year=

    Where do we stand with implicit neural representations? a technical and performance survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03688 , year=

    arXiv

  152. [174]

    International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , pages=

    T2 mapping from super-resolution-reconstructed clinical fast spin echo magnetic resonance acquisitions , author=. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  153. [175]

    International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , pages=

    Improving cross-domain brain tissue segmentation in fetal MRI with synthetic data , author=. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  154. [176]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =

    High‐. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jmri.70164 , abstract =

    2026 doi

  155. [177]

    2025 , pages =

    BMJ , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081554 , language =

    2025 doi

  156. [178]

    and Grant, P

    Gondova, Andrea and Saucedo Olvera, Suzette and Qiu, Yinong and Guo, Haiyi and Jeong, Seungyoon and Chung, Wendy K. and Grant, P. Ellen and Kong, Xue-Jun and Im, Kiho , month = jun, year =. Fetal. doi:10.64898/2026.06.01.729342 , abstract =

    2026 doi

  157. [179]

    Pattern Recognition , author =

    An overlap invariant entropy measure of. Pattern Recognition , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(98)00091-0 , language =

    1999 doi

  158. [180]

    IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , author =

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , volume =. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 , number =

    2004

  159. [181]

    NeuroImage: Clinical , author =

    Individual-level analysis of. NeuroImage: Clinical , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103647 , language =

    2024

  160. [182]

    Condor, Jorge and Moenne-Loccoz, Nicolas and Nimier-David, Merlin and Didyk, Piotr and Gojcic, Zan and Wu, Qi , year =. Neural. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2604.01204 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  161. [183]

    Yazdani, Milad and Medghalchi, Yasamin and Ashrafian, Pooria and Hacihaliloglu, Ilker and Shahriari, Dena , editor =. Flow. Medical. 2026 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05325-1_21 , language =

    2026 doi

  162. [184]

    , year =

    Arefeen, Yamin and Levac, Brett and Tamir, Jonathan I. , year =. A. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2410.21602 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  163. [185]

    Evaluating the match of image quality metrics with radiological assessment in a dataset with and without motion artifacts , url =

    Eichhorn, Hannah and Chemnitz-Thomsen, Simon and Vouros, Evangelos and Shekhrajka, Nitesh and Frost, Robert and Van Der Kouwe, André and Ganz, Melanie , pages =. Evaluating the match of image quality metrics with radiological assessment in a dataset with and without motion art...

    2022 doi

  164. [186]

    Radiology , author =

    Opportunities in. Radiology , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190452 , language =

    2019 doi

  165. [187]

    Physical Review , author =

    Relaxation. Physical Review , author =. 1948 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.73.679 , language =

    1948 doi

  166. [188]

    and Solana, Ana Beatriz and Eichhorn, Hannah and Spieker, Veronika and Huang, Wenqi and Sprenger, Tim and Menzel, Marion I

    Niessen, Natascha and Pirkl, Carolin M. and Solana, Ana Beatriz and Eichhorn, Hannah and Spieker, Veronika and Huang, Wenqi and Sprenger, Tim and Menzel, Marion I. and Schnabel, Julia A. , year =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2509.04888 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  167. [189]

    2015 , keywords =

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1515/jpm-2014-0268 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  168. [190]

    and Kober, Tobias and Cuadra, Meritxell Bach , year =

    Richiardi, Jonas and Ravano, Veronica and Molchanova, Nataliia and Gordaliza, Pedro M. and Kober, Tobias and Cuadra, Meritxell Bach , year =. Domain shift, domain adaptation, and generalization , copyright =. Trustworthy. doi:10.1016/B978-0-44-323761-4.00015-8 , language =

    doi

  169. [191]

    T2 relaxation values in the developing preterm brain , volume =. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology , author =. 2003 , keywords =

    2003

  170. [192]

    Simulation-

    De Dumast, Priscille and Sanchez, Thomas and Lajous, Hélène and Bach Cuadra, Meritxell , editor =. Simulation-. Medical. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43990-2_32 , language =

    2023 doi

  171. [193]

    Medical Image Analysis , author =

    Automated. Medical Image Analysis , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102484 , abstract =

    2022

  172. [194]

    Jia, Steven and Mercier, Chloé and Pron, Alexandre and Girard, Nadine and Auzias, Guillaume and Rousseau, François , editor =. Joint. Perinatal,. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73260-7_2 , language =

    2025 doi

  173. [195]

    2024 , pages =

    Improving. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72378-0_41 , author =

    2024 doi

  174. [196]

    In connection with cross-referencing and possible future hyperlinking it is not a good idea to collect more that one literature item in one + +

    + is cited as + ESG96 +. In connection with cross-referencing and possible future hyperlinking it is not a good idea to collect more that one literature item in one + +. The so-called Harvard or author-year style of referencing is enabled by the package natbib . With this pack...

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.