Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 199 references

Clustered Local Projections for Short and Ultra-Short Time Series -- A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Bayesian hierarchical local projection with a sparse finite mixture pool can estimate impulse responses for short and ultra-short time series by borrowing from longer, similar series, cutting estimation error by half to 90 percent in…

desk verdict The short-sample results are real and useful; the 'ultra-short' headline claim is never actually tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04631 v2 pith:23DOS6ZK submitted 2026-08-05 econ.EM stat.ME

Todd Clark , Florian Huber This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.EMstat.ME
keywords localprojectionsimpulseresponsefunctionsBayesianhierarchicalpoolingsparsefinitemixturesunbalancedpanelsinflationdynamicsshorttimeseries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that local projection impulse responses, the standard tool for tracing how a shock moves an economic variable, can be estimated reliably for very short time series if those series are pooled with longer, related ones. Its proposed framework clusters the panel's series by the similarity of their whole response profiles and shrinks each short series toward its cluster's average response, with the strength of shrinkage learned from the data. In simulations calibrated to US macro data, the approach cuts mean absolute error by roughly half for short series and by about 80 to 90 percent for ultra-short series, and it produces whole response curves at horizons that ordinary regressions cannot even reach. If right, this makes a class of newly available short economic indicators, such as services producer price indices and regional survey price measures, usable for impulse-response analysis that standard local projections cannot perform.

What carries the argument

The central device is a three-level sparse finite mixture prior over the local projection coefficients. At the first level, each series' response is Gaussian around a cluster-specific mean; at the second level, the cluster means are tied to a common population center so that small or singleton clusters keep borrowing, more weakly, from the whole panel; at the third level, a sparse Dirichlet prior on the mixture weights with estimated concentration, built on overfitting-mixture asymptotics, empties redundant components so the effective number of clusters is learned from the data. The posterior mean of each response coefficient is a transparent precision-weighted average of the series' own OLS estimate and its cluster mean, so borrowing intensity rises automatically as the series' effective sample shrinks, and at horizons beyond the sample the coefficient is imputed from the cluster prior. A post-processing correction following the sandwich-covariance logic rescales the posterior draws using a cluster-pooled HAC long-run variance, so that the credible sets attain correct frequentist coverage despite the moving-average structure of local projection errors.

What would settle it

Build a simulation in which series within a cluster are nearly identical at short horizons but diverge at long horizons, for example through different long-run persistence or different permanent responses, give the short series only enough data for the early horizons, and check whether the model's imputed long-horizon responses and their credible bands capture the true divergent responses. If the imputed curves miss the truth while the bands stay narrow, the ultra-short pooling claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a Bayesian hierarchical local projection with a sparse finite mixture prior can estimate impulse response functions for short and ultra-short time series in an unbalanced panel by borrowing strength from longer, similar series. Each series is assigned to a latent cluster formed on the similarity of its response profile across all horizons; the posterior mean of every horizon-$h$ response $ ho_{i,h}$ is a precision-weighted average of the series' own least-squares estimate and its cluster mean, and the weight on the cluster rises endogenously as the series' own effective sample shrinks. For horizons beyond a series' effective sample length ($h > H_i$), the response is drawn from the cluster's prior distribution, so ultra-short series receive full impulse response curves with propagated uncertainty and no interpolation. In a Monte Carlo design calibrated to US data with 500 replications, the full model, which pools response and control coefficients and lets the data choose the number of clusters, reduces mean absolute error relative to series-by-series OLS local projections by about a factor of two for short series and by up to 90 percent for very short series, while costing only a few percent on long series; a cluster-pooled variance correction restores frequentist coverage of the nominal 90 percent intervals. Applied to 43 US price series, the model sorts the panel into six or seven clusters and finds that supply-chain and oil shocks move headline prices more than core prices and goods prices more than services prices.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that a series whose short-horizon responses look like its cluster's will also have long-horizon responses like its cluster's, because responses beyond a short series' own sample are drawn entirely from the cluster prior, and this is never tested since the simulation only evaluates horizons the series actually has data for.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ultra-short series with as few as 33 usable observations receive full 36-horizon impulse response curves with propagated uncertainty, something series-by-series OLS local projections cannot compute at all.
  • Long-series estimates are nearly unaffected by pooling, with a mean absolute error cost of roughly 5 to 7 percent, so the method can be applied to mixed panels without sacrificing the well-measured units.
  • The cluster partition itself is an economic object: series group by response-profile similarity rather than sectoral labels, and the model endogenously chooses between one common response and several group-specific responses.
  • Coverage of nominal 90 percent intervals on short series rises from roughly two-thirds under naive local projections to 90 to 97 percent with the cluster-pooled correction, while the single-cluster pool shows that forcing homogeneity is what creates visible bias.
  • The framework handles severely unbalanced panels without interpolation or balancing, so newly introduced short indicators can be analyzed alongside aggregate series reaching back decades.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The simulation evaluates only horizons within each series' own sample ($h \leq H_i$), so the paper's headline ultra-short claim, imputing responses beyond the sample from cluster priors, is tested only indirectly; a design where series share short-horizon responses but diverge at long horizons would settle whether the imputed far-horizon curves and their tight bands can be trusted.
  • A natural testable extension, not run in the paper, holds out the later years of the long series, treats them as ultra-short, and compares the imputed responses against the actual data, which would quantify the exchangeability assumption in the application itself.
  • The same cluster partition that pools responses could double as a real-time monitoring tool for many disaggregated price series, since the clusters are an economically interpretable low-dimensional summary of how each series transmits identified shocks.
  • Combining the cross-sectional pool with across-horizon smoothing of impulse responses, which the paper leaves for future work, would likely sharpen ultra-short estimates further by adding a within-series prior on the shape of the response curve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Bayesian hierarchical local projection estimator for panels of related time series of unequal length. Each series' horizon-h response coefficient receives a sparse finite mixture prior with cluster-specific means and variances, a population center, and, in the joint-pooling variant, horseshoe shrinkage on control coefficients. A post-processing step following Mueller (2013) rescales posterior draws using a cluster-pooled HAC variance to restore frequentist coverage, and the model imputes responses at horizons beyond a series' effective sample length from its cluster prior. The simulation, calibrated to FRED-MD data, compares five estimators across long, short, and very short series, and the application studies 43 US price series' responses to supply-chain and oil supply shocks. The paper claims substantial MAE reductions for short series, similar performance for long series, and economically sensible clusters.

Significance. If confirmed, the proposed framework would be a useful practical tool for applied macro panels with newly available short series: it gives a fully specified Gibbs sampler, data-calibrated priors, a principled treatment of unbalanced panels, and an explicit distinction between cluster-mean precision and individual-series precision, which is a genuine methodological point illustrated in Figure 7. The short-series simulation (T = 100-150) is apples-to-apples and shows MAE reductions of roughly 45-53% with coverage restored to near nominal, so the core short-series claim is credible. The very-short and ultra-short parts of the argument are not yet supported by the evidence: the benchmark row in the very-short block is computed on a different, easier support, and the h > H_i imputation is never evaluated. These are fixable with additional simulations and common-support tables, but they currently prevent the paper from fully backing its title and abstract claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3, Table 1, footnote 2] The very-short comparisons are not apples-to-apples. Footnote 2 states that naive LP is computable on only 19% of data-informed unit-horizon pairs (46%/23%/2% across the three horizon buckets), so the shaded naive-LP row in the very-short block is the raw MAE over that easy-to-estimate subset, while every pooled estimator is evaluated on all data-informed pairs. The ratios 0.24-0.34 in the very-short block therefore compare pooled estimators on a harder set of pairs against a benchmark restricted to pairs where it is computable, inflating the apparent gains. I ask for a common-support comparison in which all estimators are evaluated on the same pairs, and ideally a feasible benchmark defined on all pairs, before the very-short point-estimation gains are reported as they are in the abstract.
  2. [Section 2.3 / Appendix B.1, Eq. (13)] The ultra-short extrapolation is load-bearing for the paper's title and for the fourth distinguishing feature listed in the introduction, but it is never validated. Equation (13) imputes responses at horizons h > H_i from the cluster prior, while Eq. (20) assigns the series to clusters using only its data-informed horizons h <= H_i; this rests on the exchangeability assumption that short-horizon IRF similarity implies long-horizon similarity. In the simulation the clusters are defined by factor loadings that apply at all horizons, so the assumption is true by construction, yet the paper still reports accuracy only on pairs with h <= H_i (Tables 1-2, Figures 1-4), and the application's Table 3 notes that no series exhausts its own sample within H = 35. The authors should add a simulation that evaluates h > H_i, including a DGP in which clusters are identifiable only at short horizons, and should report the coverage of the imputed intervals. Without this, the ultra-short borrowing claim is unsupported.
  3. [Section 3.5, Table 2] The very-short coverage comparisons are also not on a common support. The note to Table 2 says that in the very-short block naive LP covers only the pairs where it is computable, so the naive coverage rates 0.47, 0.32, and 0.25 are conditional on the same easy subset as in Table 1, while the pooled credible intervals are evaluated on all data-informed pairs. The resulting gap is overstated on the common support. In addition, even the headline pooled method attains only 0.85, 0.79, and 0.63 in the very-short block, well below nominal at medium and long horizons; the paper should state this qualification clearly in its summary of the simulation results.
  4. [Section 3.1] The simulation's DGP calibration involves choices that govern the size of the reported gains: the shock loadings are tripled, the innovation scale is halved, and persistence is increased by five percent. These adjustments are motivated as matching empirical persistence and ensuring the shock has quantitatively important effects, but the paper does not vary the degree of cluster separation, the number of clusters, or the signal-to-noise ratio. Since the central claim is that the mixture pooling beats both naive LP and the single-pool alternatives, a sensitivity analysis over these design features would materially strengthen the evidence; as it stands, the simulation is a single well-tuned DGP, and the relative ranking across methods could be design-dependent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] The notation for the posterior mean after Eq. (2) uses tau^2_{i,h} for the posterior variance while the prior variance is tau^2_h; the two are easy to confuse, and I recommend a distinct symbol such as V_{i,h}^{post}.
  2. [Section 2.2] In the display for the posterior of mu_h, the posterior mean and the parameter share the symbol mu_h; please write the posterior mean as an overlined or hatted quantity.
  3. [General] The terms 'very short' (T in [25,60]) and 'ultra-short' (h > H_i) are used for different concepts; the introduction and abstract should define them explicitly and avoid implying that the very-short simulation exercises the ultra-short mechanism.
  4. [General] The paper does not include a data or code availability statement; given the detail of the Gibbs sampler and the authors' acknowledgement of AI-assisted coding, a replication code release would substantially help readers.
  5. [Figures 4-6 and References] There are minor typographical issues: 'Newey-W est' appears in figure notes, the reference to Jorda contains a stray backtick, and Table 3's heading 'T i,H' is not defined in the notes; these should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Independent-DGP simulation benchmark keeps the central claim non-circular; only mild empirical-Bayes and non-load-bearing self-citation feedback.

full rationale

The paper's central accuracy claim is tested against true IRFs from an independently constructed factor DGP calibrated to FRED-MD data, so the reported gains do not reduce to a fitted input. The hierarchical pooling and sparse finite mixture are standard Bayesian devices whose cluster means are estimated from the data and compared with known truth. The data-calibrated prior scales (b0, bB from a pilot K-means) and the cluster-pooled Muller correction are empirical-Bayes and post-processing choices that use the same sample and create mild feedback into the estimates, but they do not define the target being predicted. The h > H_i imputation in Eq. (13) is explicitly acknowledged as a prior draw rather than a data-derived estimate, and the simulations evaluate only data-informed horizons, so while the ultra-short extrapolation is untested, it is a transparent modeling assumption rather than a circular derivation. Self-citations such as Clark (1999) and Huber, Krisztin, and Pfarrhofer (2023) are used for positioning and comparison only, not as load-bearing support for the main result.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a few domain assumptions rather than fitted constants: the most important are a common observed shock, cluster membership common across horizons, and exchangeability of beyond-sample responses. The estimated hyperparameters are data-calibrated but conventional; none of the headline simulation numbers is produced by fitting a parameter to the target result. The latent clusters are the paper's principal invented construct, and their validity is the main risk.

free parameters (7)
  • S (maximum number of mixture components) = 8
    Set by hand as a generous upper bound in simulations and application (Sections 2.5, 4.1); the sparse Dirichlet prior prunes empty components. Results may depend on this bound being large enough.
  • Dirichlet concentration prior for e0 = Gamma(1,200), mean 0.005
    Hyperprior chosen to favor parsimonious cluster allocations; e0 is estimated by Metropolis-Hastings (Appendix B.2).
  • b0 (within-cluster inverse Gamma scale) = 0.083 (supply-chain), 0.063 (oil)
    Calibrated from within-cluster dispersion of OLS estimates on long series under a preliminary four-group K-means partition (Section 4.1).
  • bB (between-cluster inverse Gamma scale) = 0.356 (supply-chain), 0.431 (oil)
    Calibrated from dispersion of the K-means cluster means on long series (Section 4.1).
  • Population center prior scale c = 100
    Chosen to be weakly informative in the level-3 prior (5), m_h ~ N(0, c*s_y^2).
  • Weakly informative shape and scale hyperparameters = a0=aB=2.5, a_sigma=2.1, horseshoe half-Cauchy(0,1)
    Chosen by hand to be mildly informative and data-scaled (Sections 3.2, 4.1); these do not materially drive the reported gains but are part of the prior specification.
  • DGP calibration adjustments in the simulation = a_g1 increased by 5%, sigma_g halved, b_g,l tripled
    Chosen by hand in Section 3.1 to make the simulated monetary policy shock economically meaningful; simulation conclusions are conditional on these choices.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The panel shares a single observed structural shock w_t, aligned across all series.
    Invoked in Section 2.1. Without a common shock, the LP coefficients rho_i,h have no common interpretation and the pooling prior is meaningless.
  • domain assumption Each series is assigned to one latent cluster z_i that is common across all horizons.
    Section 2.3 defines z_i independent of h; the paper mentions horizon-specific mixtures only as future work. If short-run and long-run similarity differ, single-membership can force a series into a cluster that misrepresents part of its IRF.
  • domain assumption For h > H_i the response is exchangeable with and drawn from the cluster's prior distribution.
    Appendix B.1, Eq. (13). This is the ultra-short borrowing assumption, and it is never validated against a benchmark in the simulation.
  • domain assumption Units in the same cluster have sufficiently similar LP residual MA structure that the cluster-pooled HAC variance is a valid substitute for unit-specific long-run variance.
    Section 2.6 justifies this by a VAR-like DGP argument; if wrong, the coverage claims for short series are not reliable.
  • standard math Rousseau-Mengersen asymptotics and the sparse Dirichlet prior cause redundant mixture components to be emptied out.
    Section 2.5 relies on sparse finite mixture theory from Malsiner-Walli, Fruhwirth-Schnatter, and Grun (2016); accepted as standard in the cited literature.
  • ad hoc to paper The simulation DGP adjustments in Section 3.1 are representative of US macro data.
    The persistence, innovation scale, and shock loading adjustments are made to match empirical persistence and generate meaningful responses; they are not derived from first principles.
invented entities (1)
  • Latent cluster assignments z_i and cluster means mu_{s,h}
    purpose: Group series by similarity of their IRF profiles so that short series can borrow from long series within the same cluster.
    These are model constructs rather than directly observed objects. The paper provides internal checks, such as comparing clusters across two shocks and showing cluster means are more precise than members, but there is no external validation that the estimated clusters correspond to a true grouping; the validity of the ultra-short imputation depends entirely on this construct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Clustered Local Projections for Short and Ultra-Short Time Series -- A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/23DOS6ZK

@misc{pith2026260804631,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Clustered Local Projections for Short and Ultra-Short Time Series -- A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/23DOS6ZK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04631}
}
read the original abstract

Estimating the dynamic effects of economic shocks in short and very short samples is impeded by a lack of degrees of freedom. We offer a solution based on a Bayesian hierarchical framework for estimating local projection (LP) impulse response functions across a panel of related time series. The framework explicitly accommodates unbalanced panels in which some series are substantially shorter than others, allowing the short series to borrow information from longer ones at horizons where the short series carry little or no own data. Since series might exhibit heterogeneous dynamics, we develop a sparse finite mixture pool that clusters units by similarity of their impulse response profiles. We show in simulations that our approach substantially improves LP estimation accuracy relative to the standard approach if the time series are short while producing similar LPs for longer time series. Using a US price dataset, augmented with survey responses, we find that supply-chain and oil shocks trigger heterogeneous reactions of different price measures, with headline price indices responding more sharply than their core counterparts and goods prices changing more than services prices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04631 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bias and posterior standard deviation by horizon, FRED-MD calibration. Notes: Rows, top to bottom: very short (T ∈ [25, 60]), short (T ∈ [100, 150]), and long (T = 500) series; y-axis free per panel. Left column: across-unit median of |Er[ˆρ (r) i,h] − ρi,h|. Right column: across-unit median of the posterior standard deviation of ρi,h, taking the median across replications per unit-horizon pair; for naive LP, its Ne… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Loss-minimizing estimator at each (h, ω) pair, FRED-MD calibration. Notes: Panels, left to right: very short, short, and long series. Color and per-cell symbol: the method minimizing the across-unit average loss Lm i,h(ω) at each (h, ω) pair (the symbol identifies the method in grayscale). Each method’s loss is averaged over its data-informed unit-horizon pairs; naive LP competes where it is computable (footnote 2).… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pairwise loss comparison, FRED-MD calibration. Notes: Each entry: the fraction of units at which method (1) achieves a lower Lm i,h(ω) than method (2), on unit-horizon pairs where both are computable. Rows, top to bottom: very short, short, and long series; columns: the three pairwise comparisons. Darker blue = method (1) wins more often; blank regions in the very-short row are horizons at which naive LP is computab… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Empirical coverage of nominal 0.90 interval by horizon, FRED-MD calibration. Notes: Panels, left to right: very short (T ∈ [25, 60]), short (T ∈ [100, 150]), and long (T = 500) series. Dashed grey line: nominal level. Each method is shown with its headline inference re…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cluster IRFs in response to the K¨anzig supply-chain shock, pre-COVID sample (1971:01–2019:12). Notes: One panel per active mixture cluster (sorted by size). Cluster posterior median (dark line) with 68%, 80%, and 90% pointwise M¨uller-corrected bands (shaded), and pos…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cluster IRFs in response to the Baumeister–Hamilton oil supply shock, pre-COVID sample (1975:02–2019:12). Notes: Layout as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Precision of the cluster-mean IRF against the precision of the individual member responses. Notes: The vertical axis is on a log scale. The vertical distance from the diamond to the points is the within-cluster dispersion of individual responses around the common locat…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

199 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , Volume =

    Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia and Kaufmann, Sylvia , Title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , Volume =. 2008 , Pages =

    2008

  2. [2]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Fr. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  3. [3]

    Fast and order-invariant inference in

    Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary , journal=. Fast and order-invariant inference in. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  4. [4]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Deep neural networks for estimation and inference , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  5. [5]

    2006 , publisher=

    Williams, Christopher KI and Rasmussen, Carl Edward , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  6. [6]

    The Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

    Bayesian nonparametric covariance regression , author=. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  7. [7]

    Hierarchical shrinkage

    Tang, Tao and Mak, Simon and Dunson, David , journal=. Hierarchical shrinkage. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  8. [8]

    Oil, Inflation Expectations, and Household Characteristics: A Nonlinear Heterogeneous Agent

    Baumeister, Christiane and Frank, Pascal and Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary , year =. Oil, Inflation Expectations, and Household Characteristics: A Nonlinear Heterogeneous Agent

Show all 199 references
  1. [9]

    Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post

    Cogley, Timothy and Sargent, Thomas J , journal=. Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post. 2005 , doi=

    2005

  2. [10]

    Were there regime switches in

    Sims, Christopher A and Zha, Tao , journal=. Were there regime switches in. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  3. [11]

    Nowcasting in a pandemic using non-parametric mixed frequency

    Florian Huber and Gary Koop and Luca Onorante and Michael Pfarrhofer and Josef Schreiner , keywords =. Nowcasting in a pandemic using non-parametric mixed frequency. Journal of Econometrics , volume =. 2023 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.11.006 , url =

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Linero , year=

    Antonio R. Linero , year=. Defensive Model Expansion for Robust. 2510.09598 , archivePrefix=

  5. [13]

    Tony Chernis and Niko Hauzenberger and Haroon Mumtaz and Michael Pfarrhofer , year=. A. 2509.04928 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    and Boivin, Jean and Eliasz, Piotr , title =

    Bernanke, Ben S. and Boivin, Jean and Eliasz, Piotr , title =. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1162/0033553053327452 , url =

    2005 doi

  7. [15]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume =

    Gregor Kastner and Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter and Hedibert Freitas Lopes , title =. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume =. 2017 , publisher =

    2017

  8. [16]

    Messner and Georg J

    Manuel Gebetsberger and Jakob W. Messner and Georg J. Mayr and Achim Zeileis. Estimation Methods for Nonhomogeneous Regression Models: Minimum Continuous Ranked Probability Score versus Maximum Likelihood. Monthly Weather Review. 2018. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-17-0364.1

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Annual Review of Statistics and Its Applications , year=

    Proper scoring rules for estimation and forecast evaluation , author=. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Applications , year=

  10. [18]

    Econometrica , volume=

    Sign restrictions, structural vector autoregressions, and useful prior information , author=. Econometrica , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  11. [19]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =

    Dynamic causal effects in a nonlinear world: the good, the bad, and the ugly , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2025 , publisher =

    2025

  12. [20]

    Machine learning the macroeconomic effects of financial shocks , journal =

    Niko Hauzenberger and Florian Huber and Karin Klieber and Massimiliano Marcellino , keywords =. Machine learning the macroeconomic effects of financial shocks , journal =. 2025 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112260 , url =

    2025

  13. [21]

    Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper , volume=

    Nonparametric Local Projections , author=. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  14. [22]

    Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=

    Handling sparsity via the horseshoe , author=. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=. 2009 , organization=

    2009

  15. [23]

    Adaptive shrinkage in

    Huber, Florian and Feldkircher, Martin , journal=. Adaptive shrinkage in. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  16. [24]

    Kastner, Gregor , journal=. Sparse. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  17. [25]

    and Ng, Serena , journal=

    McCracken, Michael W. and Ng, Serena , journal=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  18. [26]

    McCracken and Serena Ng , title =

    Michael W. McCracken and Serena Ng , title =. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review , year =. doi:10.20955/r.103.1-44 , url =

    doi

  19. [27]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    Are the effects of financial market disruptions big or small? , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  20. [28]

    2018 , doi =

    Functional Approximation of Impulse Responses , journal =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  21. [29]

    Angrist and Oscar Jorda and Guido M

    Joshua D. Angrist and Oscar Jorda and Guido M. Kuersteiner , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  22. [30]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  23. [31]

    and Marcellino, Massimiliano , title=

    Carriero, Andrea and Chan, Joshua and Clark, Todd E. and Marcellino, Massimiliano , title=. Journal of Econometrics , year=2022, volume=

    2022

  24. [32]

    Bayesian additive regression trees using

    Hern. Bayesian additive regression trees using. Statistics and Computing , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  25. [33]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Identification of structural Vector Autoregressions by stochastic volatility , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

  26. [34]

    Forecasting using variational

    Gefang, Deborah and Koop, Gary and Poon, Aubrey , journal=. Forecasting using variational. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  27. [35]

    On theory for

    Ro. On theory for. The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  28. [36]

    Minnesota-type adaptive hierarchical priors for large

    Chan, Joshua CC , journal=. Minnesota-type adaptive hierarchical priors for large. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  29. [37]

    Bayesian

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark, Todd E and Marcellino, Massimiliano , journal=. Bayesian. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  30. [38]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Generalized shrinkage methods for forecasting using many predictors , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  31. [39]

    2006 , publisher=

    All of Nonparametric Statistics , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  32. [40]

    Gibbs sampling methods for

    Kozumi, Hideo and Kobayashi, Genya , journal=. Gibbs sampling methods for. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  33. [41]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Adaptive hierarchical priors for high-dimensional vector autoregressions , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  34. [42]

    Quadratic

    Sentana, Enrique , journal=. Quadratic. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  35. [43]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  36. [44]

    Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized

    Bollerslev, Tim , journal=. Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  37. [45]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Stochastic volatility with leverage: Fast and efficient likelihood inference , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  38. [46]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Bayesian dynamic factor models and portfolio allocation , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  39. [47]

    A new algorithm for structural restrictions in

    Dimitris Korobilis , keywords =. A new algorithm for structural restrictions in. European Economic Review , volume =. 2022 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104241 , url =

    2022

  40. [48]

    CEPR Discussion Paper Series , volume =

    Modeling and forecasting macroeconomic downside risk , author=. CEPR Discussion Paper Series , volume =

  41. [49]

    International Economic Review , year =

    Adrian, Tobias and Boyarchenko, Nina and Giannone, Domenico , title =. International Economic Review , year =

  42. [50]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    Bayesian nonparametric vector autoregressive models , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  43. [51]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Functional horseshoe priors for subspace shrinkage , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  44. [52]

    A unifying view of sparse approximate

    Quinonero-Candela, Joaquin and Rasmussen, Carl Edward , journal=. A unifying view of sparse approximate. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  45. [53]

    IEEE Signal Processing Letters , volume=

    A simple sampler for the horseshoe estimator , author=. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , volume=. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  46. [54]

    Kastner, Gregor and Huber, Florian , journal=. Sparse. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  47. [55]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Bayesian approximate kernel regression with variable selection , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  48. [56]

    Ancillarity-sufficiency interweaving strategy (

    Kastner, Gregor and Fr. Ancillarity-sufficiency interweaving strategy (. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=. 2014 , doi=

    2014

  49. [57]

    Bayes inference in regression models with

    Chib, Siddhartha and Greenberg, Edward , journal=. Bayes inference in regression models with. 1994 , doi =

    1994

  50. [58]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Combined density nowcasting in an uncertain economic environment , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  51. [59]

    The Review of Economic Studies , volume=

    Stochastic volatility: likelihood inference and comparison with ARCH models , author=. The Review of Economic Studies , volume=. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  52. [60]

    American Economic Review , volume=

    Vulnerable growth , author=. American Economic Review , volume=. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  53. [61]

    2022 , journal=

    The term structure of growth-at-risk , author=. 2022 , journal=

    2022

  54. [62]

    Machine Learning , volume=

    Random forests , author=. Machine Learning , volume=. 2001 , doi =

    2001

  55. [63]

    Statistics & Probability Letters , volume=

    Bayesian quantile regression , author=. Statistics & Probability Letters , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  56. [64]

    Stochastic model specification search for

    Fr. Stochastic model specification search for. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  57. [65]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Inducing sparsity and shrinkage in time-varying parameter models , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  58. [66]

    2021 , institution=

    Macroeconomic and financial risks: A tale of mean and volatility , author=. 2021 , institution=

    2021

  59. [67]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=

    Nowcasting tail risk to economic activity at a weekly frequency , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=

  60. [68]

    Capturing macroeconomic tail risks with

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark,. Capturing macroeconomic tail risks with. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper , volume=. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  61. [69]

    Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Research Working Paper , volume=

    Assessing macroeconomic tail risks in a data-rich environment , author=. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Research Working Paper , volume=. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  62. [70]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    Forecasting tail risks , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  63. [71]

    International Journal of Forecasting , year =

    Laurent Ferrara and Matteo Mogliani and Jean-Guillaume Sahuc , title =. International Journal of Forecasting , year =

  64. [72]

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=

    Constructing density forecasts from quantile regressions , author=. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  65. [73]

    International Journal of Forecasting , volume=

    Asymmetry in unemployment rate forecast errors , author=. International Journal of Forecasting , volume=. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  66. [74]

    National Bank of Belgium Research Working Paper , volume=

    Quantile-based inflation risk models , author=. National Bank of Belgium Research Working Paper , volume=. 2018 , url=

    2018

  67. [75]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =

    Raffaella Giacomini and Ivana Komunjer , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2005 , publisher =

    2005

  68. [76]

    Journal of Financial Economics , volume=

    Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: An empirical evaluation , author=. Journal of Financial Economics , volume=. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  69. [77]

    2019 , author =

    Growth in stress , journal =. 2019 , author =

    2019

  70. [78]

    2020 , journal=

    The macroeconomy as a random forest , author=. 2020 , journal=

    2020

  71. [79]

    Clark and Florian Huber and Gary Koop and Massimiliano Marcellino and Michael Pfarrhofer , title =

    Todd E. Clark and Florian Huber and Gary Koop and Massimiliano Marcellino and Michael Pfarrhofer , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  72. [80]

    Tail forecasting with multivariate

    Clark, Todd E and Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary and Marcellino, Massimiliano and Pfarrhofer, Michael , journal=. Tail forecasting with multivariate. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  73. [81]

    2020 , journal=

    How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting? , author=. 2020 , journal=

    2020

  74. [82]

    Can machine learning catch the

    Goulet Coulombe, Philippe and Marcellino, Massimiliano and Stevanovic, Dalibor , year=. Can machine learning catch the. arXiv , volume=

  75. [83]

    , title =

    Kiley, Michael T. , title =. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume =. 2022 , number =

    2022

  76. [84]

    International Journal of Forecasting , volume=

    Quantile regression forecasts of inflation under model uncertainty , author=. International Journal of Forecasting , volume=. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  77. [85]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Forecasting the distribution of economic variables in a data-rich environment , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  78. [86]

    Are macroeconomic variables useful for forecasting the distribution of

    Manzan, Sebastiano and Zerom, Dawit , journal=. Are macroeconomic variables useful for forecasting the distribution of. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  79. [87]

    Asymmetric quantile persistence and predictability: the case of

    Manzan, Sebastiano and Zerom, Dawit , journal=. Asymmetric quantile persistence and predictability: the case of. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  80. [88]

    2021 , journal=

    Machine learning advances for time Series forecasting , author=. 2021 , journal=

    2021

  81. [89]

    Essays in Honor of M

    James Mitchell and Aubrey Poon and Gian Luigi Mazzi , title =. Essays in Honor of M. Hashem Pesaran: Prediction and Macro Modeling , publisher =

  82. [90]

    James Mitchell and Aubrey Poon and Dan Zhu , title=

  83. [91]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Forecasting inflation in a data-rich environment: the benefits of machine learning methods , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  84. [92]

    Let the tree decide:

    Sofia Velasco , year=. Let the tree decide:. 2506.11551 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    Brookings Papers on Economic Activity , year=

    When is growth at risk? , author=. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity , year=

  86. [94]

    Real-time nowcasting with a

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark,. Real-time nowcasting with a. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A , volume=. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  87. [95]

    2020 , journal=

    Financial variables as predictors of real growth vulnerability , author=. 2020 , journal=

    2020

  88. [96]

    and George, Edward I

    Chipman, Hugh A. and George, Edward I. and McCulloch, Robert E. , journal=. Bayesian. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  89. [97]

    Addressing

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark,. Addressing. The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  90. [98]

    and Chipman, Hugh A

    Pratola, Matthew T. and Chipman, Hugh A. and George, Edward I. and McCulloch, Robert E. , journal=. Heteroscedastic. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  91. [99]

    Common drifting volatility in large

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark,. Common drifting volatility in large. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  92. [100]

    FEDS working paper , number=

    Financial and Macroeconomic Data Through the Lens of a Nonlinear Dynamic Factor Model , author=. FEDS working paper , number=. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  93. [101]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    Macroeconomic forecasting performance under alternative specifications of time-varying volatility , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  94. [102]

    and George, Edward I

    Chipman, Hugh A. and George, Edward I. and McCulloch, Robert E. , journal=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  95. [103]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=

    Forecast comparisons in unstable environments , author=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  96. [104]

    Raftery , title =

    Tilmann Gneiting and Adrian E. Raftery , title =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  97. [105]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Comparing density forecasts using threshold- and quantile-weighted scoring rules , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  98. [106]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Comparing predictive accuracy , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  99. [107]

    manuscript , year=

    Modeling and forecasting macroeconomic downside risk , author=. manuscript , year=

  100. [108]

    Inference in

    Huber, Florian and Rossini, Luca , journal=. Inference in. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  101. [109]

    Nowcasting in a pandemic using non-parametric mixed frequency

    Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary and Onorante, Luca and Pfarrhofer, Michael and Schreiner, Josef , journal=. Nowcasting in a pandemic using non-parametric mixed frequency. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  102. [110]

    and Reeves, G

    van den Boom, W. and Reeves, G. and Dunson, D. , journal=. Approximating posteriors with high-dimensional nuisance parameters via integrated rotated. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  103. [111]

    Advances in Econometrics , volume=

    Panel Vector Autoregressive models: A survey , author=. Advances in Econometrics , volume=

  104. [112]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  105. [113]

    International Journal of Forecasting , volume=

    Forecasting economic and financial variables with global VARs , author=. International Journal of Forecasting , volume=. doi:10.1198/073500104000000019 , year=

    doi

  106. [114]

    Forecasting with global Vector Autoregressive models: A

    Crespo Cuaresma, Jesus and Feldkircher, Martin and Huber, Florian , journal=. Forecasting with global Vector Autoregressive models: A

  107. [115]

    Does joint modelling of the world economy pay off? Evaluating global forecasts from a

    Dovern, Jonas and Feldkircher, Martin and Huber, Florian , journal=. Does joint modelling of the world economy pay off? Evaluating global forecasts from a. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  108. [116]

    Density forecasting using

    Huber, Florian , journal=. Density forecasting using. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  109. [117]

    International Economic Review , volume=

    Estimating multicountry VAR models , author=. International Economic Review , volume=. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  110. [118]

    European Economic Review , volume=

    Model uncertainty in panel Vector Autoregressive model , author=. European Economic Review , volume=. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  111. [119]

    Biometrika , volume=

    The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals , author=. Biometrika , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  112. [120]

    and Casella, G

    Park, T. and Casella, G. , journal=. The

  113. [121]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Dirichlet-Laplace priors for optimal shrinkage , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  114. [122]

    Real-time forecasting with a mixed-frequency

    Schorfheide, Frank and Song, Dongho , journal=. Real-time forecasting with a mixed-frequency. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  115. [123]

    Journal of statistical software , pages=

    Mixed frequency data sampling regression models: the R package midasr , author=. Journal of statistical software , pages=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  116. [124]

    and Galv

    Clements, Michael P. and Galv. Forecasting. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  117. [125]

    Mixed-frequency

    Ankargren, Sebastian and Yang, Yukai , year=. Mixed-frequency

  118. [126]

    A look into the factor model black box: Publication lags and the role of hard and soft data in forecasting GDP

    Marta Ba \'n bura and Gerhard R \"u nstler. A look into the factor model black box: Publication lags and the role of hard and soft data in forecasting GDP. International Journal of Forecasting. 2011

    2011

  119. [127]

    Short-term forecasts of euro area real

    Diron, Marie , journal=. Short-term forecasts of euro area real. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  120. [128]

    Real-time density forecasts from

    Clark,. Real-time density forecasts from. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  121. [129]

    Review of Financial Studies , year=

    Forecasting through the Rearview Mirror: Data Revisions and Bond Return Predictability , author=. Review of Financial Studies , year=

  122. [130]

    Real-time forecasting of German GDP based on a large factor model with monthly and quarterly data

    Christian Schumacher and J. Real-time forecasting of German GDP based on a large factor model with monthly and quarterly data. International Journal of Forecasting. 2008

    2008

  123. [131]

    Comparing and evaluating

    Geweke, John and Amisano, Gianni , journal=. Comparing and evaluating. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  124. [132]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  125. [133]

    Ba. Large. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  126. [134]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=

    The generalized dynamic-factor model: Identification and estimation , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  127. [135]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    Nowcasting: The real-time informational content of macroeconomic data , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  128. [136]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume =

    D'Agostino, Antonello and Gambetti, Luca and Giannone, Domenico , title =. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume =. doi:10.1002/jae.1257 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jae.1257 , year =

    doi

  129. [137]

    Handbook of Economic Forecasting , volume=

    Now-casting and the real-time data flow , author=. Handbook of Economic Forecasting , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  130. [138]

    2018 , publisher=

    Applied economic forecasting using time series methods , author=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  131. [139]

    Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=

    Data revisions are not well behaved , author=. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  132. [140]

    Review of Economics and Statistics , pages=

    The use of preliminary data in econometric forecasting , author=. Review of Economics and Statistics , pages=. 1978 , publisher=

    1978

  133. [141]

    Data revisions to German national accounts: Are initial releases good nowcasts?

    Till Strohsal and Elias Wolf. Data revisions to German national accounts: Are initial releases good nowcasts?. International Journal of Forecasting. in press. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.12.006

    2019 doi

  134. [142]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=

    Monetary policy in a data-rich environment , author=. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  135. [143]

    Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

    Frontiers of real-time data analysis , author=. Journal of Economic Literature , volume=

  136. [144]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Forecasting output with the composite leading index: A real-time analysis , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  137. [145]

    Handbook of Economic Forecasting , volume=

    Forecasting with real-time macroeconomic data , author=. Handbook of Economic Forecasting , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  138. [146]

    Journal of Econometrics , volume=

    A real-time data set for macroeconomists , author=. Journal of Econometrics , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  139. [147]

    McCracken and Serena Ng , title =

    Michael W. McCracken and Serena Ng , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2016 , publisher =

    2016

  140. [148]

    Journal of applied econometrics , volume=

    Multivariate GARCH models: a survey , author=. Journal of applied econometrics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  141. [149]

    Forni, Mario and Gambetti, Luca and Granese, Antonio and Sala, Luca and Soccorsi, Stefano , journal=. An. 2025 , Month =

    2025

  142. [150]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Determining the number of primitive shocks in factor models , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  143. [151]

    and Eisenstat, Eric and Strachan, Rodney W

    Chan, Joshua C.C. and Eisenstat, Eric and Strachan, Rodney W. , journal=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  144. [152]

    , title =

    Baumeister, Christiane and Hamilton, James D. , title =. Econometrica , volume =. doi:10.3982/ECTA12356 , url =

    doi

  145. [153]

    The Review of Economic Studies , volume=

    Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy , author=. The Review of Economic Studies , volume=. 2005 , doi=

    2005

  146. [154]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=

    Central bank macroeconomic forecasting during the global financial crisis: The European Central Bank and Federal Reserve Bank of New York experiences , author=. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  147. [155]

    Primiceri , title=

    Domenico Giannone and Michele Lenza and Giorgio E. Primiceri , title=. The Review of Economics and Statistics , year=2015, volume=. doi:10.1162/rest_a_00483 , abstract=

    2015 doi

  148. [156]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=2010, volume=

    Marta Banbura and Domenico Giannone and Lucrezia Reichlin , title=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=2010, volume=. doi:10.1002/jae.1137 , url=

    2010 doi

  149. [157]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=2013, volume=

    Gary Koop , title=. Journal of Applied Econometrics , year=2013, volume=. doi:10.1002/jae.1270 , url=

    2013 doi

  150. [158]

    Carriero, Andrea and Clark,. Large. Journal of Econometrics , year=2019, volume=212, number=1, pages=. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.024 , url=

    2019 doi

  151. [159]

    , title=

    West, Kenneth D. , title=. Econometrica , year=1996, volume=

    1996

  152. [160]

    ECB Occasional Paper Series , year=2017, volume=

    Rodolfo Arioli and Colm Bates and Heinz Dieden and Ioana Duca and Roberta Friz and Christian Gayer and Geoff Kenny and Aidan Meyler and Iskra Pavlova , title=. ECB Occasional Paper Series , year=2017, volume=

    2017

  153. [161]

    EC , month = jan, year =. The

  154. [162]

    The Econometrics of Panel Data

    Marno Verbeek , title=. The Econometrics of Panel Data. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics , year=2008, volume=

    2008

  155. [163]

    and Eusepi, Stefano and Giannone, Domenico and Qian, Eric and Sbordone, Argia , title =

    Crump, Richard K. and Eusepi, Stefano and Giannone, Domenico and Qian, Eric and Sbordone, Argia , title =. 2025 , journal=

    2025

  156. [164]

    Stock and Mark W

    James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson , title =. 2025 , journal=

    2025

  157. [165]

    Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations , Journal =

    Simon Gilchrist and Egon Zakraj. Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations , Journal =. 2012 , Month =

    2012

  158. [166]

    Lewis and Egon Zakraj

    Giovanni Favara and Simon Gilchrist and Kurt F. Lewis and Egon Zakraj. Recession Risk and the Excess Bond Premium , year =

  159. [167]

    Hashem and Potter, Simon M

    Koop, Gary and Pesaran, M. Hashem and Potter, Simon M. , title=. Journal of Econometrics , year=1996, volume=74, number=1, pages=

    1996

  160. [168]

    Chan, Joshua C. C. and Matthes, Christian and Yu, Xuewen , note =. Large Structural

  161. [169]

    American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics , Volume =

    Kim, Hee Soo and Matthes, Christian and Phan, Toàn , Title =. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics , Volume =. 2025 , Month =

    2025

  162. [170]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =

    Marcelle Chauvet and Jeremy Piger , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  163. [171]

    M\"uller and Mark W

    Ulrich K. M\"uller and Mark W. Watson , title =. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume =. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  164. [172]

    Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =

    Niko Hauzenberger and Florian Huber and Massimiliano Marcellino and Nico Petz , title =. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  165. [173]

    2014 , type =

    Fernald, John , title =. 2014 , type =

    2014

  166. [174]

    2026 , journal =

    Marco Schwarzbach , title =. 2026 , journal =

    2026

  167. [175]

    Clark and Florian Huber and Gary Koop , journal=

    Todd E. Clark and Florian Huber and Gary Koop , journal=. A Nonparametric Approach to Augmenting a. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  168. [176]

    and Miranda-Agrippino, Silvia and Ricco, Giovanni , title =

    Ferreira, Leonardo N. and Miranda-Agrippino, Silvia and Ricco, Giovanni , title =. Review of Economics and Statistics , year =

  169. [177]

    Huber, Florian and Matthes, Christian and Pfarrhofer, Michael , title =

  170. [178]

    Responses to monetary policy shocks in the east and the west of

    Jaroci\'. Responses to monetary policy shocks in the east and the west of. Journal of Applied Econometrics , year =

  171. [179]

    Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections , journal =

    Jord\`. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections , journal =. 2005 , volume =

    2005

  172. [180]

    Local projections vs

    Li, Dake and Plagborg-M. Local projections vs. Journal of Econometrics , year =

  173. [181]

    Model-based clustering based on sparse finite

    Malsiner-Walli, Gertraud and Fr\". Model-based clustering based on sparse finite. Statistics and Computing , year =

  174. [182]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , year =

    Rousseau, Judith and Mengersen, Kerrie , title =. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , year =

  175. [183]

    Mumtaz, Haroon and Piffer, Michele , title =

  176. [184]

    M\". Risk of. Econometrica , year =

  177. [185]

    Computational Economics , year =

    Tanaka, Masahiro , title =. Computational Economics , year =

  178. [186]

    Discussion Papers , year =

    Fortier, Eric , title =. Discussion Papers , year =

  179. [187]

    Review of Economic Studies , year =

    Ke-Li Xu , title =. Review of Economic Studies , year =

  180. [188]

    Florian Huber and Tam. A. The Annals of Applied Statistics , number =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  181. [189]

    and Park, Taeyoung , title =

    van Dyk, David A. and Park, Taeyoung , title =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , year =

  182. [190]

    , title =

    Liu, Jun S. , title =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , year =

  183. [191]

    Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume =

    Piger, Jeremy and Stockwell, Thomas , title =. Journal of Applied Econometrics , volume =. doi:10.1002/jae.70003 , year =

    doi

  184. [192]

    NBER Macroeconomics Annual , volume =

    Local Projections or Vector Autoregressions?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  185. [193]

    2024 , doi =

    Bias in Local Projections , journal =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  186. [194]

    , title =

    Clark, Todd E. , title =. The Review of Economics and Statistics , volume =. 1999 , month =

    1999

  187. [195]

    , Title =

    Känzig, Diego R. , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2021 , Month =

    2021

  188. [196]

    and Raghavan, Ramya , Title =

    Känzig, Diego R. and Raghavan, Ramya , Title =. 2026 , Month =

    2026

  189. [197]

    , Title =

    Baumeister, Christiane and Hamilton, James D. , Title =. American Economic Review , Volume =. 2019 , Month =

    2019

  190. [198]

    Journal of Monetary Economics , volume =

    The long and variable lags of monetary policy:. Journal of Monetary Economics , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  191. [199]

    Local Projection Inference Is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think , journal =

    Montiel Olea, Jos. Local Projection Inference Is Simpler and More Robust Than You Think , journal =. 2021 , volume =

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.