New symplectic singularities from $SU(2)$ gauge theories

Amihay Hanany; Deshuo Liu; Guhesh Kumaran; Travis Schedler

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 18 references

New symplectic singularities from $SU(2)$ gauge theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A family of Sp(1)≃SU(2) gauge theories with N fundamental and one Sym^k half-hypermultiplet has Higgs branch an isolated conical symplectic singularity exactly for k=1,3,5,7, with k=5,7 defining new families named hSO(N) and iSO(N).

desk verdict Solid construction paper with a real new family of isolated symplectic singularities; the classification argument has a gap worth fixing before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06451 v1 pith:32KFNEJN submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th math.AGmath.SG

Amihay Hanany , Guhesh Kumaran , Deshuo Liu , Travis Schedler This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thmath.AGmath.SG MSC 14B0514L3053C2653D20

keywords symplecticsingularityisolatedHiggsbranchSU(2)gaugetheoryhalf-hypermultipletHilbertseriesKleinsingularitieshyper-Kählerquotient

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies three-dimensional N=4 supersymmetric gauge theories with gauge group Sp(1)≃SU(2), N fundamental half-hypermultiplets, and one half-hypermultiplet in the Sym^k representation. It argues that the Higgs branch is an isolated conical symplectic singularity exactly for k=1,3,5,7. The case k=3 reproduces the known gSO(N) family, while k=5 and k=7 define two new infinite families, named hSO(N) and iSO(N). The one-dimensional members of these families are Klein singularities: A3, E6, and E8, with E7 obtained by a Z2 quotient. A sympathetic reader would care because these are new isolated symplectic singularities, the basic building blocks of more general symplectic singularities, produced by a minimal SU(2) gauge theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electric quiver Q_{3.2}: gauge group Sp(1), N fundamental half-hypermultiplets with SO(N) flavour symmetry, and one half-hypermultiplet in the Sym^k representation, with an O(1) flavour symmetry for odd k and Sp(1) for even k. The argument is carried by the Higgs-mechanism criterion: an isolated symplectic singularity corresponds to the gauge group breaking only to the trivial group, and any residual U(1), Pin(2), or finite Γ_ADE subgroup would produce a nontrivial symplectic leaf. The machinery includes branching rules of SU(2) representations to Pin(2), U(1), and finite subgroups, together with the Z_l-invariant-matter dimension condition that selects which discrete breakings are possible, and Hilbert-series and highest-weight generating function computations by Weyl integration.

What would settle it

Compute, for k=5 and k=7 with various N, the complex dimension of the matter invariant under each possible Z_l, and check whether any dimension exceeds 6; if a suitable Z_3 or Z_5 invariant sector has dimension greater than 6 and admits a nonzero Higgs vev, the claimed isolation fails. A direct check is to test whether the Higgs branch of the k=5, N=1 theory has Hilbert series (1-$t^{24}$)/((1-$t^{6}$)(1-$t^{8}$)(1-$t^{12}$)); if it does not, the identification of hSO(1) with E6 is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the electric quiver with one Sp(1) gauge node, N fundamental half-hypermultiplets, and one Sym^k half-hypermultiplet, the Higgs branch is an isolated conical symplectic singularity precisely when k=1,3,5,7. The cases k=5 and k=7 are new; the paper names them hSO(N) and iSO(N). The classification is argued through the Higgs mechanism: because the W-boson representation [2] of Sp(1) decomposes into charges ±2, a breaking to U(1) or Pin(2) cannot give the W-bosons mass from the odd-charge matter, so the only possible breakings are to finite subgroups; the requirement that the Z_l-invariant matter have complex dimension greater than six rules out all l for k=3,5,7 but allows breakings for k≥9, and even k cases are excluded by the appearance of a one-dimensional symplectic leaf. Hilbert series and highest-weight generating function computations, performed by Weyl integration for the k=5,7 cases and matched to magnetic quiver results for k=3, support the identification. The one-dimensional members are the Klein A3, E6 and E8 singularities; the Z2 quotient hSO(1)/Z2 gives E7.

Load-bearing premise

The classification relies on the stated but not derived condition that a Z_l-invariant matter sector of complex dimension greater than 6 is needed to make a nontrivial Higgsing possible; if that threshold is wrong, the k=5 or k=7 cases could admit a Higgsing and hSO(N) or iSO(N) would not be isolated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

hSO(N) and iSO(N) become new infinite families of isolated conical symplectic singularities, with no known magnetic quiver construction.
The Klein singularities E6 and E8, and via a Z2 quotient E7, are realised as Higgs branches (hyper-Kähler quotients) of Sp(1) or Sp(1)×O(1) gauge theories, complementing Kronheimer's affine-quiver construction.
The electric quiver permits Higgs branch Hilbert series and HWG computations that the magnetic quiver cannot supply because of non-simply laced edges.
In the anomaly-free cases the Coulomb branch Hilbert series are those of D-type Klein singularities; the k=3, N=2 theory is self-mirror, and D5/Z2=E6 and D8/Z2=E7 relate the Coulomb and Higgs branches.
If the Higgs mechanism analysis is correct, no other odd k (k≥9) from this two-parameter family gives an isolated symplectic singularity.
The Z2 quotient constructions yield concrete Hilbert series for gSO(N)/Z2, hSO(N)/Z2, and iSO(N)/Z2, including the E7 case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These new singularities may appear as transverse slices in Hasse diagrams of other 3d N=4 theories, and a magnetic quiver for them might require orthosymplectic or exceptional gauge groups beyond the unitary classification in the paper's reference [1].
The 'dimension greater than six' threshold may reflect a general necessary condition for minimal Higgsing of Sp(1) with two matter representations; one could test it by deriving a universal formula from the gcd lattice of matter charges.
The C^8///Sp(1) constructions of A3, E6, and E8 suggest that each Klein singularity might admit a uniform small hyper-Kähler quotient by a single SU(2), raising the question of whether explicit hyper-Kähler metrics can be extracted from these quotients.
For odd N, where the Witten anomaly makes the theory formally ill-defined, the moduli space is still claimed to be a genuine symplectic singularity; this could be checked by finding an anomaly-free UV completion or a 4d/2d lift whose Higgs branch matches.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things. First, the paper does deliver something new: there are two new infinite families of isolated conical symplectic singularities, hSO(N) and iSO(N), coming from SU(2) gauge theories with a Sym^k half-hypermultiplet for k=5,7. It also rewrites gSO(N) as an electric quiver and gives SU(2) hyper-Kähler quotient descriptions of the E6, E7, and E8 Klein singularities. Those are real advances for the quiver-geometry subfield, not just repackaging. Second, the central classification claim is not fully proved. The paper argues that only k=1,3,5,7 give isolated singularities, but the key step excluding Z_l breakings for k=5,7 rests on a stated dimension threshold after Eq. (3.11) that is asserted, not derived. That threshold is doing load-bearing work, and the authors have the branching rules in Appendix B to check it directly; they just don't show the count. The even-k exclusion also leans on an 'expectation' about product flavour symmetry, which is weaker than the rest of the argument. These are fixable gaps, but they are genuine gaps.

The paper's strengths are the parts that are actually computed. The Hilbert series for gSO(N) match the known magnetic quiver results, and the Klein identifications match standard Hilbert series. That gives real confidence the electric quiver is computing the right spaces. The authors are also honest about the Witten anomaly for odd N: they explicitly say the quiver is a formal Hilbert-series tool there, not a physical gauge theory. No code is shipped, but the unrefined Hilbert series for Sym^7 were independently checked by a human to some orders, and the rest are reproducible from the formulas given.

For the record, I don't think the stress-test concern kills the paper. The count is probably right, and the palindromic Hilbert series plus the dimension-one matches make the conclusion plausible. But 'probably' is not the standard the paper sets for itself. The abstract and Section 3 claim a classification, and that classification should come with the actual finite check of which Z_l breakings are possible. If the authors add that, the paper is in good shape. Without it, the isolation claim for hSO(N) and iSO(N) is a conjecture supported by strong evidence rather than a theorem.

Who is this for? Anyone working on symplectic singularity classifications, quiver Higgs branches, or 3d mirror symmetry. It deserves a serious referee. I would conditionally accept, with the condition being a written proof or explicit case-by-case count for the Z_l exclusion, and ideally a more rigorous statement about the even-k flavour-symmetry expectation.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies 3d N=4 Sp(1) gauge theories with N fundamental half-hypermultiplets and one half-hypermultiplet in the Sym^k representation. It first uses chain polymerisation to produce an electric quiver whose Higgs branch reproduces the known gSO(N) singularities, and then generalises the construction to Sym^k matter with k=1,3,5,7. The central claim is that exactly these four values give isolated conical symplectic singularities, with k=5 and k=7 defining two new infinite families hSO(N) and iSO(N). The paper computes Higgs-branch Hilbert series and HWGs for several cases, identifies the one-dimensional members as Klein A3, E6, E8 (and E7 via a Z2 quotient), and computes Coulomb-branch Hilbert series with conjectured symplectic duals. The gSO(N) Hilbert series are checked against independent magnetic-quiver results.

Significance. If the isolation claim holds, hSO(N) and iSO(N) are genuinely new infinite families of isolated symplectic singularities, and the paper gives novel hyper-Kähler quotient realisations of the Klein E6, E7, and E8 singularities as Higgs branches of Sp(1) (or Sp(1)xO(1)) gauge theories. The paper's strengths are concrete: exact Hilbert series computations, machine-assisted but independently checked series for Sym^7, explicit HWGs for hSO(N), and external consistency with the known gSO(N) magnetic quiver results. The principal gap is the Higgs-mechanism classification that underlies the claim that k=5,7 are isolated; several decisive statements are asserted rather than demonstrated. The mathematical construction is well defined for all N as a hyper-Kähler quotient, but the physical gauge-theory interpretation for odd N is explicitly only formal because of the Witten anomaly.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.1.1, after Eq. (3.11)] The exclusion of Z_l breakings for k=3,5,7 is the load-bearing step for the isolation of hSO(N) and iSO(N), but it is not actually demonstrated. The condition that the Z_l-invariant matter have complex dimension greater than 6 is asserted without derivation, and the sentence 'No such Z_l can be found for k=3,5,7' is not backed by an explicit count. The ingredients for the count are in Eq. (B.67): for odd l the fundamental multiplets contribute no invariant, and the invariant complex dimension of [k] is the multiplicity of weights k-2s congruent to 0 mod l. Please display these multiplicities for the relevant triples (k,l) = (5,3), (5,5), (7,3), (7,5), (7,7), and derive the threshold from the number of quaternionic degrees that must be eaten by the three broken gauge generators. As written, the reader cannot verify the decisive exclusion.
[Section 3.1.1, E-type and D-type subgroup exclusions] The statements that Sp(1) cannot be broken to 2T, 2O, 2I or to Dic_l for odd k are plausible but are made in a few sentences without the necessary multiplicity comparison. Since Appendix B gives exact generating functions P^Gamma_{n,r}(t), please show explicitly, by citing the relevant equations, that for odd k the restriction [k]|_Gamma contains none of the irreducible components of [2]|_Gamma that the W-bosons would need to acquire mass. This is a separate part of the same classification argument and should be checkable without redoing the branching computation.
[Sections 4.2 and 4.3, Eqs. (4.5) and (4.13)] The closed forms for the unrefined Hilbert series of hSO(N) and iSO(N) are stated 'in general' but only finite-N examples are tabulated. Please state explicitly whether these formulas are proven by symbolic Weyl integration for arbitrary N or are extrapolated from the computed cases. Because the claim of new infinite families is partly supported by these formulas, the distinction between a theorem and a conjecture should be visible to the reader.

minor comments (5)

[Introduction] The abstract says the classification is 'argued for' through the Higgs mechanism, while the introduction says 'A proof that these are the only other isolated singularities from this construction is also given'. Please align these statements; if the Higgs-mechanism analysis is only an argument, say so consistently.
[Section 3, after quiver (3.1)] The Witten-anomaly discussion is too terse. The statement that T([3])=5 for the [3] of Sp(1) depends on a normalisation convention; please state that convention and spell out the anomaly condition that makes odd N anomalous. The formal moduli-space interpretation for odd N is then cleaner.
[Section 3.1.1, quiver (3.12)] The residual quiver in Eq. (3.12) is difficult to parse: the index range of the flavour multiplicities F_i and the meaning of the edge labels 1,3,...,l-2 are unclear. Please redraw or rewrite the quiver so that Eq. (3.13) is unambiguous.
[Section 4, Tables 1 and 2] The palindromials in Tables 1 and 2 are displayed with ellipses; please state explicitly that the omitted terms are determined by palindromicity, or provide complete polynomials for the smaller cases.
[Section 5, Eq. (5.7)] The phrase 'Z2 cover' is carefully qualified in the text, but the summary in Eq. (5.7) could be misread as asserting an honest cover. Consider writing 'formal Hilbert-series Z2 cover' in the displayed equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hilbert series and isolation claims are computed from quiver data, not fitted to outputs; the underived Z_l-count after Eq. (3.11) is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the electric quiver Q3.2 specifies a gauge group, N fundamental half-hypermultiplets, and one Sym^k half-hypermultiplet; the Higgs-branch Hilbert series and HWGs are then computed by Weyl integration and the monopole formula from that data. No parameter is fitted to the claimed singularities, and the principal cross-checks are external: the k=3 case is matched against the magnetic-quiver results of ref. [1] (Bourget et al.), and the one-dimensional members are matched against the standard Hilbert series of the Klein singularities A3, E6, E7, and E8. For the new k=5,7 families, the isolation claim is argued through the Higgs-mechanism branching analysis of Section 3.1; the sentence 'No such Z_l can be found for k=3,5,7' and the 'complex dimension greater than 6' non-triviality condition after Eq. (3.11) are asserted rather than demonstrated. That is a completeness or correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the assertion is not one of the inputs from which the Hilbert series are computed, and no prediction is statistically forced by a fitted value. The only notable self-citation is ref. [9] (Quiver Polymerisation), used as a method citation for constructing the k=3 electric quiver from magnetic quivers; this is not load-bearing for the new k=5,7 families and is independently checked by the matching gSO(N) Hilbert series. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is used to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely relabelled. Verdict: no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; N and k are discrete family parameters, not free parameters. No new physical entities are postulated. The construction relies on standard background (hyper-Kähler quotients as symplectic singularities, subgroup classification of SU(2), known Hilbert series of Kleinian singularities), one domain assumption about the leaf-Higgsing correspondence, the explicit decision to treat anomalous odd-N theories formally, and one ad hoc threshold condition used in the classification. The absence of an independent magnetic quiver for hSO(N)/iSO(N) means the new families are self-certified by their own Hilbert series and Higgs-mechanism analysis.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Higgs branch of a 3d N=4 gauge theory is a hyper-Kähler quotient and a symplectic singularity; symplectic leaves correspond to the possible unbroken gauge subgroups in the Higgs mechanism.
Invoked throughout Section 3.1; standard in the field but not proved here. The isolatedness conclusion for hSO(N)/iSO(N) depends on this correspondence.
ad hoc to paper A Z_l breaking (l odd) is allowed only if the Z_l-invariant matter has complex dimension greater than 6.
Stated after Eq. (3.11) without derivation or citation; it is the load-bearing criterion that eliminates k=3,5,7 from the classification.
domain assumption For odd N, the anomalous Sp(1) theory is still treated as a formal tool: the quiver defines a moduli space through its Hilbert series even though the physical gauge theory does not exist.
Explicitly stated in Section 3 after quiver (3.1): 'take the view that the quiver is a tool to compute Hilbert series of moduli spaces, giving only physical interpretation when N is even.' This weakens the physical Higgs-branch reading for odd N.
standard math The only proper subgroups of SU(2) relevant for unbroken gauge symmetry are Pin(2), U(1), Z_l, Dic_l, 2T, 2O, and 2I.
Standard classification of closed subgroups of SU(2), used to organize the case analysis in Section 3.1.
domain assumption The magnetic quivers for gSO(N) from ref [1] correctly describe the gSO(N) singularities; the electric quiver's Hilbert series must match them for k=3.
Used in Section 4.1 as the benchmark to identify the electric quiver for gSO(N); also cited in the abstract for the k=1,3 identifications.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New symplectic singularities from $SU(2)$ gauge theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32KFNEJN

@misc{pith2026260806451,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New symplectic singularities from $SU(2)$ gauge theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32KFNEJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06451}
}

abstract

Families of $\mathrm{Sp}(1)\simeq\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge theories with eight supercharges are found to have a Higgs branch which is an isolated symplectic singularity. These are, in some sense, the most ``minimal'' gauge theories as they only Higgs to a trivial theory. The matter content is $N$ fundamental half-hypermultiplets and one half-hypermultiplet in the $\mathrm{Sym}^k$ representation where $k=1,3,5,7$. The cases of $k=1,3$ reproduce the known Kraft--Procesi construction for minimal nilpotent orbit closures of $\mathrm{SO}(N+1)$ and the $g\mathrm{SO}(N)$ singularities of \cite{Bourget:2025wsp}, respectively. The cases $k=5,7$ are new isolated symplectic singularities which are termed $h\mathrm{SO}(N)$ and $i\mathrm{SO}(N)$, respectively. The classification of these isolated symplectic singularities is argued for through the Higgs mechanism, with Hilbert series and highest weight generating (HWG) functions computed for some cases. Each of the $g\mathrm{SO}(N)$, $h\mathrm{SO}(N)$, and $i\mathrm{SO}(N)$ families has a (quaternionic) one-dimensional member; these are the Klein $A_3$, $E_6$, and $E_8$ singularities, respectively. Our construction hence provides realisations of these Klein singularities as Higgs branches (hyper-K\"ahler quotients) of $\mathrm{Sp}(1)$ gauge theories, complementary to Kronheimer's construction \cite{Kronheimer:1989zs} using the $\widehat A_3$, $\widehat E_6$, and $\widehat E_8$ affine quivers. The Klein $E_7$ singularity is also realised as a Higgs branch (hyper-K\"ahler quotient) of an $\mathrm{Sp}(1)\times\mathrm{O}(1)$ gauge theory.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[2]

Kronheimer,The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kählerquotients,J

P.B. Kronheimer,The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kählerquotients,J. Diff. Geom. 29(1989) 665

work page 1989
[1]

Bourget, Q

A. Bourget, Q. Lamouret, S. Moura Soysüren and M. Sperling,Classifying Isolated Symplectic Singularities via 3dN= 4Coulomb Branches,2504.05373

arXiv
[3]

Beauville,Symplectic singularities,Inventiones Mathematicae139(2000) 541 [math/9903070]

A. Beauville,Symplectic singularities,Inventiones Mathematicae139(2000) 541 [math/9903070]

arXiv 2000
[4]

Englert and R

F. Englert and R. Brout,Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321

1964
[5]

Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,Phys

P.W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508

work page 1964
[6]

Guralnik, C.R

G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble,Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585

1964
[7]

Kibble,Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys

T.W.B. Kibble,Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys. Rev.155(1967) 1554

work page 1967
[8]

Cremonesi, A

S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni,Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of3dN= 4gauge theories,JHEP01(2014) 005 [1309.2657]

arXiv 2014

Show all 18 references

[9]

Hanany, R

A. Hanany, R. Kalveks and G. Kumaran,Quiver Polymerisation,2406.11561

arXiv
[10]

Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys

E. Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 324

1982
[11]

Bourget, M

A. Bourget, M. Sperling and Z. Zhong,Decay and Fission of Magnetic Quivers,2312.05304

arXiv
[12]

Bourget, M

A. Bourget, M. Sperling and Z. Zhong,Higgs branch RG-flows via Decay and Fission, 2401.08757

arXiv
[13]

Grimminger, A

J.F. Grimminger, A. Hanany and D. Liu,3d Mirrors and Phase Diagrams of Abelian Gauge Theories,2503.08791. – 34 –

arXiv
[14]

Bennett, A

S. Bennett, A. Hanany, G. Kumaran, C. Li, D. Liu and M. Sperling,Quiver subtraction on the Higgs branch,Nucl. Phys. B1016(2025) 116917 [2409.16356]

2025 arXiv
[15]

Burnside,Theory of Groups of Finite Order, Cambridge Library Collection - Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1897), 10.1017/CBO9781139237253

W. Burnside,Theory of Groups of Finite Order, Cambridge Library Collection - Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (1897), 10.1017/CBO9781139237253

doi
[16]

Intriligator and N

K.A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg,Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories,Phys. Lett. B387(1996) 513 [hep-th/9607207]

1996 arXiv
[17]

Klevers and W

D. Klevers and W. Taylor,Three-Index Symmetric Matter Representations of SU(2) in F-Theory from Non-Tate Form Weierstrass Models,JHEP06(2016) 171 [1604.01030]

2016 arXiv
[18]

Vinberg and V.L

È.B. Vinberg and V.L. Popov,On a class of quasihomogeneous affine varieties,Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya6(1972) 743. – 35 –

1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Kronheimer,The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kählerquotients,J

P.B. Kronheimer,The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kählerquotients,J. Diff. Geom. 29(1989) 665

work page 1989

[2] [1]

Bourget, Q

A. Bourget, Q. Lamouret, S. Moura Soysüren and M. Sperling,Classifying Isolated Symplectic Singularities via 3dN= 4Coulomb Branches,2504.05373

arXiv

[3] [3]

Beauville,Symplectic singularities,Inventiones Mathematicae139(2000) 541 [math/9903070]

A. Beauville,Symplectic singularities,Inventiones Mathematicae139(2000) 541 [math/9903070]

arXiv 2000

[4] [4]

Englert and R

F. Englert and R. Brout,Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321

1964

[5] [5]

Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,Phys

P.W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508

work page 1964

[6] [6]

Guralnik, C.R

G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble,Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585

1964

[7] [7]

Kibble,Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys

T.W.B. Kibble,Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories,Phys. Rev.155(1967) 1554

work page 1967

[8] [8]

Cremonesi, A

S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni,Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of3dN= 4gauge theories,JHEP01(2014) 005 [1309.2657]

arXiv 2014