Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Ricci-flat metrics from gauged linear $\sigma$-models without RG flow

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gauged linear sigma models with shadow fields give explicit Ricci-flat Kähler metrics on canonical bundles over products of projective spaces.

desk verdict New explicit symplectic potentials for Ricci-flat metrics on canonical bundles over products of projective spaces; the Monge-Ampère identity is clean, but the missing regularity proof keeps the main claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09918 v1 pith:ETVHT7GY submitted 2026-08-10 hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MPmath.SG

Dmitri Bykov , Ondrej Hulik , Ulf Lindström , Martin Roček , Rikard von Unge This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.DGmath.MPmath.SG MSC 53C2553C5532Q2514M2553D20 PACS 02.40.Ky11.10.Kk11.30.Pb
keywords Ricci-flatKählermetricsgaugedlinearsigmamodelsshadowfieldsCalabiansatzMonge-Ampèreequationtoricgeometrygeneralizedcanonicallinebundle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs explicit Ricci-flat Kähler metrics on the total space of the canonical line bundle over any product of complex projective spaces, using two-dimensional gauged linear $\sigma$ models whose target spaces have indefinite signature. The wrong-sign directions come from “shadow” chiral superfields, yet the quotient metric is ordinary and positive definite. The construction is a generalized Calabi ansatz in symplectic coordinates: a symplectic potential with a tunable function $F_R(\mu)$ is shown to satisfy the Monge-Ampère equation, which is exactly Ricci-flatness. Because the metric is Ricci-flat, the $\sigma$ model is conformally invariant at one loop without renormalization-group flow. The paper also shows the shadow fields can be replaced by twisted chiral fields through a generalized Kähler gauging with the Large Vector Multiplet, giving a manifestly positive-definite starting point.

What carries the argument

The key object is the generalized Calabi ansatz in symplectic coordinates. Starting from the Fubini-Study potential on each projective factor, the paper writes the symplectic potential of the singular cone as sums of $L\ln L$ terms and then resolves it by shifting the constraints, $s_A=\mu+a_A$, and adding an extra term $F_R(\mu)$ fixed by the Monge-Ampère equation. The equation reduces to the first-order condition $R'(\mu)=\prod_A (s_A)^{n_A-1}/n_A$; because $R$ factorizes, $F_R$ is again a sum of logarithmic terms, which is what allows the result to be read off as a GLSM via the $P$ and $Q$ matrices of toric geometry. Shadow fields enter as chiral superfields with negative-signature kinetic terms, corresponding in the $P$ matrix to rows with the opposite sign.

What would settle it

Compute the Hessian of (4.27) in the region where $\mu$ and all $\mu_A^i$ satisfy $L_A^i>0$ for a concrete example such as $\mathbb{CP}^2$ with complex roots $b\omega^i$; a negative eigenvalue at any point would show the metric is not positive definite, and a vanishing $L_A^i$ away from the expected boundary would show the coordinate domain was misidentified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the resolved symplectic potential (4.27), with $L_A^i$ constrained by $\sum_i L_A^i=n_A(\mu+a_A)$ and the function $F_R$ determined through $F_R'=\ln R$ by $R'(\mu)=\prod_A (s_A)^{n_A-1}/n_A$ with $s_A=\mu+a_A$, solves the Monge-Ampère equation (2.35), the symplectic-coordinate form of Ricci-flatness. The paper verifies the determinant identity in Appendix A and reads off the toric data: the $P$ and $Q$ matrices of the associated GLSM, with shadow fields appearing as rows and columns of opposite sign. The resulting Kähler metrics live on the total space of $K_B=\otimes_A O(-n_A)$ over $B=\prod_A \mathbb{CP}^{n_A-1}$, resolving the singular cone metrics of the standard Calabi ansatz. In this sense the GLSM produces a Ricci-flat (Calabi-Yau) metric directly, without flowing to the infrared.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the symplectic potential (4.27) defines an honest metric: the coordinates stay in the domain where all $L_A^i$ are positive, the Hessian is positive definite, and the metric is smooth and complete; the paper proves the Monge-Ampère equation but does not verify these regularity properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every product of complex projective spaces admits an explicit Ricci-flat Kähler metric on the total space of its canonical line bundle, realized by a finite GLSM with shadow fields.
  • The associated sigma models have vanishing one-loop beta function, so they are conformally invariant without any RG flow.
  • The shadow fields can be reinterpreted as twisted chiral fields in a generalized Kähler quotient, giving a model that is positive definite from the start.
  • The metric contains multiple Kähler moduli (the resolution parameters $a_A$ and roots $b_I$), so the construction covers more than a single metric in each family.
  • The toric $P$ and $Q$ matrices provide a direct dictionary from the geometric data to the GLSM charges and FI parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the regularity gaps are filled, these metrics would be explicit representatives of the noncompact Calabi-Yau theorem for this family of crepant resolutions, with the parameters $a_A$ and $b_I$ parametrizing Kähler classes.
  • The same mechanism may work for other toric bases: any Kähler-Einstein base with a known symplectic potential could be fed into the generalized Calabi ansatz, with shadow fields supplying the missing determinant factor.
  • The complex FI parameters that appear in the $\mathbb{CP}^2$ example deserve a geometric interpretation; they may reflect the complexified stability condition of the GIT quotient rather than a breakdown of reality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a class of explicit Ricci-flat Kähler metrics on the total space of the canonical line bundle over a product of complex projective spaces, using gauged linear sigma models that contain chiral superfields with negative kinetic terms, called shadow fields. The main technical result is that the generalized Calabi symplectic potential (4.27), with the extra function F_R determined by R'(μ)=∏_{A=1}^N (s_A)^{n_A-1}/n_A (4.30), satisfies the toric Monge-Ampère equation (2.35). The verification is carried out in Appendix A, which reduces the determinant identity to a short calculation. The paper also reads off the toric data (P and Q matrices), works out examples for CP^{n-1} and CP^1×CP^1, and proposes an alternative interpretation in which shadow fields are replaced by twisted chiral fields via a generalized Kähler gauging with a Large Vector Multiplet.

Significance. The construction is honest and transparent: it is an ansatz-to-ODE reduction with no fitting to data, and the Monge-Ampère calculation is explicit enough to be checked line by line. If the missing regularity issues are resolved, the paper would provide a valuable family of explicit non-compact Calabi-Yau metrics and a genuinely new GLSM realization of them. However, the central claim as stated — that (4.27) defines an explicit Ricci-flat Kähler metric on a smooth manifold — is conditional, because positive definiteness, smoothness, and completeness of the metric are asserted but not established. The alternate generalized-Kähler route is also explicitly deferred in footnote 20, so it does not fill this gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.4)-(A.7); §4.2] The determinant computation proves the algebraic Monge-Ampère identity, but it does not establish that -∂²F_G is positive definite on a common domain. Positivity requires L_i^A>0, s_A>0, and R'/R>0 on the relevant moment polytope; via the Schur complement (A.7) these are exactly the conditions needed for the Hessian to be positive definite. None of these inequalities is stated, and the allowed ranges of the parameters a_A and the roots b_I are not mapped to a Kähler cone. This is load-bearing: without a domain and positivity argument, a formal solution of (2.35) could correspond to an indefinite metric, or to a metric on an orbifold or stack rather than on the claimed smooth total space.
  2. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (4.33), (4.50), (4.51)] The CP^2 example illustrates why the missing regularity check is not a formality. The roots bω^i in (4.33) are complex, and the P matrix in (4.50) contains duplicate rays (0,0,1) and (0,0,-1); the asserted identification with the smooth total space of O(-3)→CP^2 is therefore not immediate. The authors note that F is real despite complex FI terms, but they do not prove that the complex-logarithm expression defines a smooth real function on a domain, that the Hessian is positive there, or that the quotient has the claimed topology.
  3. [§5 and Appendix C.4] The construction claiming to avoid shadow fields by using twisted chiral superfields and the Large Vector Multiplet is not established at the geometric level. The (1,1) superspace reduction in (C.45)-(C.54) shows a field-theoretic equivalence, but it does not show that the resulting target-space metric is positive definite, or even that the quotient is Kähler in the conventional sense. Footnote 20 explicitly states that the geometry of this LVM gauging is under investigation, so this alternative route cannot substitute for the missing regularity proof of the main construction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'Fayet-Illiopoulos' should be 'Fayet-Iliopoulos', and 'Monge-Amp` ere' appears with a stray space in multiple places.
  2. [§4.2.1, Eq. (4.36)] For the CP^1×CP^1 example, the second condition ∑1/b_I=0 follows from the absence of a linear term in R, and the parameter count would benefit from clarification: if a is fixed, the displayed constraints appear to leave only one free parameter among the b_I, while the text says there are two genuine Kähler moduli.
  3. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (4.35), (4.37)] The complex logarithms in the symplectic potentials require branch choices; a sentence explaining how the branches are chosen so that F is real and smooth on the intended domain would improve readability.
  4. [§4.1.3 and Appendix A] The notation F_A is used both for the symplectic potential of the base (4.19) and for the Hessian blocks (A.4); renaming one of these would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Monge-Ampere ODE (4.30) fixes F_R independently of the target metric, and the GLSM is read off from the already-constructed symplectic potential as an interpretation rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The central metric construction is self-contained. The paper posits the generalized Calabi ansatz (4.27) and fixes the extra function F_R by imposing the Monge-Ampere equation (2.35); Appendix A reduces that condition, by direct differentiation, to the first-order ODE (4.30), R' = product over A of (s_A)^(n_A-1)/n_A. This is a differential equation for R, not a fit to a known target metric or to a subset of the data being 'predicted'. The resulting Ricci-flat symplectic potential is then exhibited explicitly in (4.35), (4.37), and the general form. The GLSM is admittedly obtained by reverse engineering: 'This allows us to read off the P matrix and thus find the gauged linear sigma model' (Section 4.3), so the statement that these GLSMs yield Ricci-flat metrics is true by construction rather than by an independent derivation from an a priori specified gauge theory. That is an interpretational reversal, not a logical circularity in the metric construction itself. The Large Vector Multiplet discussion in Section 5 cites prior work by overlapping authors ([48], [52]), but those references supply the LVM formalism, not the target Ricci-flat metrics, and the anomaly-sign calculation is performed here using standard supergraph propagators; footnote 20 concedes that the LVM geometry is still under investigation, which is a limitation of that section rather than a circular loading of the main result. The regularity gap noted by the skeptic (positive definiteness of -F'' and the domain where all L_i > 0) is a correctness or completeness concern about whether the formal solution defines a genuine Kahler metric on the claimed manifold; it is not a circularity, because the algebraic Monge-Ampere identity does not assume the desired conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation is essentially self-contained: the free parameters a_A and b_I are Kähler moduli (integration constants), not numbers fitted to data, and the ansatz is solved by a first-order ODE. The main unpaid premise is the positive-definiteness/regularity of the metric, which is asserted and not proven; this is recorded in the axioms. Shadow fields are the only invented entity, and they come with an internal positive-definite reinterpretation.

free parameters (3)
  • a_A (resolution shifts, A=1..N)
    One shift parameter per CP^{n_A-1} factor in the resolved symplectic potential (4.27)-(4.28); these are Kähler moduli of the resolved cone, not fitted to data.
  • b_I (roots of R(μ), I=1..D)
    Integration constants of the ODE (4.30); for CP^1×CP^1 they satisfy (4.36): Σ b_I = -3a/2 and Σ 1/b_I = 0. They parameterize Kähler classes, not fitted values.
  • overall scale of the cone metric
    The base radii β_A are fixed in terms of λ via (4.15), leaving one overall scale for the cone; the final symplectic potentials absorb it into the coordinate scaling. A homothety, not an ad hoc fit.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Monge-Ampère equation (2.35) in symplectic coordinates characterizes Ricci-flat toric Kähler metrics.
    Standard Guillemin/Abreu toric geometry; the paper derives it in §2.2.3-2.2.4 via the Legendre transform and T-duality.
  • domain assumption The Legendre transform / T-duality identification of the symplectic potential as the T-dual Kähler potential.
    Uses Buscher duality and the identification F(μ) = -K(y+ȳ) for twisted chiral fields, §2.2.4; standard in the physics literature but a domain-specific assumption.
  • domain assumption Positive definiteness of the quotient metric after gauging indefinite-signature kinetic terms.
    Asserted after (2.2) and used throughout; the metric signature after integrating out gauge fields is not proven. This is the weakest premise.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized Calabi ansatz form (4.27) for the resolved symplectic potential.
    The ansatz is chosen so the Monge-Ampère equation reduces to the ODE (4.30); it generalizes the known Calabi ansatz (4.10) and is the main structural input.
  • domain assumption The gauging of generalized Kähler isometries by the Large Vector Multiplet reproduces the shadow GLSM, and the tadpole calculation yields the modified Calabi-Yau condition (2.51).
    Depends on the LVM constructions [48,52] and supergraph rules [53,54] reviewed in Appendix C; the companion paper [50] is cited for the full relation.
invented entities (1)
  • Shadow fields/coordinates (negative-signature chiral superfields) independent evidence
    purpose: Allow GLSM quotients to produce Ricci-flat metrics directly, without RG flow.
    The constructed symplectic potentials are explicit and checkable, and §5 plus Appendix C provide a positive-definite UV interpretation via twisted chiral fields and the Large Vector Multiplet, so the bookkeeping entity is corroborated rather than pulled from a hat to force the result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ricci-flat metrics from gauged linear $\sigma$-models without RG flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ETVHT7GY

@misc{pith2026260809918,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ricci-flat metrics from gauged linear $\sigma$-models without RG flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ETVHT7GY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09918}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate a class of Ricci-flat K\"ahler metrics on generalized conifolds constructed via gauged linear sigma models (GLSMs) with indefinite signature. By introducing shadow coordinates (superfields) entering the sigma model with negative signature kinetic term, we show that these GLSMs yield explicit Ricci-flat metrics on complex cones over products of projective spaces. We provide a general formula for the resulting K\"ahler potentials, along with detailed examples. Our results suggest new directions for the study of Calabi-Yau metrics and toric geometry, and raise interesting questions about the geometric meaning of indefinite signature models. We also give an interpretation in terms of a novel generalized K\"ahler gauging.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Vacuum configurations for superstrings

    P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten. “Vacuum configurations for superstrings”.Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985), pp. 46–74

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Orbifold resolution by D-branes

    M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene, and D. R. Morrison. “Orbifold resolution by D-branes”. Nucl. Phys. B506 (1997), pp. 84–106. arXiv:hep-th/9704151

    arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    Metrics on D-brane Orbifolds

    M. R. Douglas and B. R. Greene. “Metrics on d-brane orbifolds”.Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1 (1998), pp. 184–196. arXiv:hep-th/9707214

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    On K¨ ahler manifolds with vanishing canonical class

    E. Calabi. “On K¨ ahler manifolds with vanishing canonical class”.Algebraic geome- try and topology. A symposium in honor of S. Lefschetz. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957, pp. 78–89

    work page 1957

  5. [5]

    Calabi’s conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry

    S.-T. Yau. “Calabi’s conjecture and some new results in algebraic geometry”.Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences74.5 (1977), pp. 1798–1799

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler manifold and the complex Monge-Amp` ere equation, I

    S.-T. Yau. “On the Ricci curvature of a compact K¨ ahler manifold and the complex Monge-Amp` ere equation, I”.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics31.3 (1978), pp. 339–411

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    Asymptotically Flat Selfdual Solutions to Euclidean Gravity

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson. “Asymptotically Flat Selfdual Solutions to Euclidean Gravity”.Phys.Lett.B74 (1978), p. 249

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Multi - Instantons

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking. “Gravitational Multi - Instantons”.Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978), p. 430

    work page 1978

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Comments on Conifolds

    P. Candelas and X. C. de la Ossa. “Comments on Conifolds”.Nucl.Phys.B342 (1990), pp. 246–268

    1990

  2. [10]

    Hamiltonian constructions of K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics and K¨ ahler metrics of constant scalar curvature

    H. Pedersen and Y. S. Poon. “Hamiltonian constructions of K¨ ahler-Einstein metrics and K¨ ahler metrics of constant scalar curvature”.Communications in Mathematical Physics136.2 (1991), pp. 309 –326

    1991

  3. [11]

    Ricci-flat metrics on the complexification of a compact rank one sym- metric space

    M. H. Stenzel. “Ricci-flat metrics on the complexification of a compact rank one sym- metric space”.Manuscripta Mathematica80.1 (1993), pp. 151–163. 20The geometry of this novel generalized gauging by the L VM is under investigation. 43

    1993

  4. [12]

    Hyperk¨ ahler metrics on cotangent bundles of Her- mitian symmetric spaces

    O. Biquard and P. Gauduchon. “Hyperk¨ ahler metrics on cotangent bundles of Her- mitian symmetric spaces”.Geometry and Physics. Ed. by J. Andersen, J. Dupont, H. Pedersen, and A. Swann. Vol. 184. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996, pp....

    1996

  5. [13]

    3-branes on resolved conifold

    L. A. Pando Zayas and A. A. Tseytlin. “3-branes on resolved conifold”.JHEP11 (2000), p. 028. arXiv:hep-th/0010088

    2000 arXiv

  6. [14]

    A Note on conifolds

    K. Higashijima, T. Kimura, and M. Nitta. “A Note on conifolds”.Phys. Lett. B518 (2001), pp. 301–305. arXiv:hep-th/0107100

    2001 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ricci flat Kahler manifolds from super- symmetric gauge theories

    K. Higashijima, T. Kimura, and M. Nitta. “Ricci flat Kahler manifolds from super- symmetric gauge theories”.Nucl. Phys. B623 (2002), pp. 133–149. arXiv:hep- th/ 0108084

    2002

  8. [16]

    Gauge theoretical construction of non- compact Calabi-Yau manifolds

    K. Higashijima, T. Kimura, and M. Nitta. “Gauge theoretical construction of non- compact Calabi-Yau manifolds”.Annals Phys.296 (2002), pp. 347–370. arXiv:hep- th/0110216

    2002

  9. [17]

    Calabi-Yau manifolds of cohomogeneity one as complex line bundles

    K. Higashijima, T. Kimura, and M. Nitta. “Calabi-Yau manifolds of cohomogeneity one as complex line bundles”.Nucl. Phys. B645 (2002), pp. 438–456. arXiv:hep- th/0202064

    2002

  10. [18]

    Hamiltonian 2-Forms in K¨ ahler Geometry, I General Theory

    V. Apostolov, D. M. Calderbank, and P. Gauduchon. “Hamiltonian 2-Forms in K¨ ahler Geometry, I General Theory”.Journal of Differential Geometry73.3 (2006), pp. 359 –412

    2006

  11. [19]

    Resolutions of non-regular Ricci-flat Kahler cones

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks. “Resolutions of non-regular Ricci-flat Kahler cones”.J. Geom. Phys.59 (2009), pp. 1175–1195. arXiv:0707.1674 [math.DG]

    2009 arXiv

  12. [20]

    General Kerr-NUT-AdS metrics in all dimensions

    W. Chen, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope. “General Kerr-NUT-AdS metrics in all dimensions”. Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006), pp. 5323–5340. arXiv:hep-th/0604125

    2006 arXiv

  13. [21]

    van Coevering.Calabi-Yau metrics on canonical bundles of flag varieties

    C. van Coevering.Calabi-Yau metrics on canonical bundles of flag varieties. 2018. arXiv:1807.07256 [math.DG]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Ricci-Flat Metrics on Vector Bundles Over Flag Manifolds

    I. Achmed-Zade and D. Bykov. “Ricci-Flat Metrics on Vector Bundles Over Flag Manifolds”.Commun. Math. Phys.376.3 (2020), pp. 2309–2328. arXiv:1905.00412 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hyperkahler Metrics and Supersymmetry

    N. J. Hitchin, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstrom, and M. Rocek. “Hyperkahler Metrics and Supersymmetry”.Commun. Math. Phys.108 (1987), p. 535

    1987

  16. [24]

    Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions

    E. Witten. “Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions”.Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993). Ed. by B. Greene and S.-T. Yau, pp. 159–222. arXiv:hep-th/9301042

    1993 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The long flow to freedom

    O. Aharony, S. S. Razamat, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett. “The long flow to freedom”. JHEP02 (2017), p. 056. arXiv:1611.02763 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Long Way to Ricci Flatness

    J. Chen, C.-H. Sheu, M. Shifman, G. Tallarita, and A. Yung. “Long Way to Ricci Flatness”.JHEP10 (2020), p. 059. arXiv:2006.01188 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kaehler structures on toric varieties

    V. Guillemin. “Kaehler structures on toric varieties.” English.J. Differ. Geom.40.2 (1994), pp. 285–309.issn: 0022-040X; 1945-743X/e

    1994

  20. [28]

    Kahler geometry of toric manifolds in symplectic coordinates

    M. Abreu. “Kahler geometry of toric manifolds in symplectic coordinates” (2000). arXiv:math/0004122 [math.DG]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [29]

    M´ etriques k¨ ahl´ eriennes et fibr´ es holomorphes

    E. Calabi. “M´ etriques k¨ ahl´ eriennes et fibr´ es holomorphes”.Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure12.2 (1979), pp. 269–294

    1979

  22. [30]

    Supersymmetry and Kahler Manifolds

    B. Zumino. “Supersymmetry and Kahler Manifolds”.Phys. Lett. B87 (1979), p. 203

    1979

  23. [31]

    Four Loop beta Function for the N=1 and N=2 Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model in Two-Dimensions

    M. T. Grisaru, A. E. M. van de Ven, and D. Zanon. “Four Loop beta Function for the N=1 and N=2 Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Model in Two-Dimensions”.Phys. Lett. B173 (1986), pp. 423–428. 44

    1986

  24. [32]

    Two-Dimensional Supersymmetric Sigma Models on Ricci Flat Kahler Manifolds Are Not Finite

    M. T. Grisaru, A. E. M. van de Ven, and D. Zanon. “Two-Dimensional Supersymmetric Sigma Models on Ricci Flat Kahler Manifolds Are Not Finite”.Nucl. Phys. B277 (1986), pp. 388–408

    1986

  25. [33]

    Five Loop Divergences for theN“2 Supersymmetric NonlinearσModel

    M. T. Grisaru, D. I. Kazakov, and D. Zanon. “Five Loop Divergences for theN“2 Supersymmetric NonlinearσModel”.Nucl. Phys. B287 (1987), p. 189

    1987

  26. [34]

    A Symmetry of the String Background Field Equations

    T. H. Buscher. “A Symmetry of the String Background Field Equations”.Phys. Lett. B194 (1987), pp. 59–62

    1987

  27. [35]

    Streets.Generalized geometry, T-duality, and renormalization group flow

    J. Streets.Generalized geometry, T-duality, and renormalization group flow. 2013. arXiv:1310.5121 [math.DG]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    The Geometry of Duality

    P. S. Howe, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstr¨ om, and M. Roˇ cek. “The Geometry of Duality”. Phys. Lett. B168 (1986), pp. 89–92

    1986

  29. [37]

    Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties

    V. Batyrev. “Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties”.J. Algebraic Geom.3 (1994), p. 493. arXiv:alg-geom/9310003

    1994 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties

    D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser. “Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties”.Nucl. Phys. B440 (1995), pp. 279–354. arXiv: hep-th/9412236

    1995 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds

    J. Sparks. “Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds”.Surveys Diff. Geom.16 (2011), pp. 265–324. arXiv:1004.2461 [math.DG]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ricci-flat K¨ ahler metrics on crepant resolutions of K¨ ahler cones

    C. van Coevering. “Ricci-flat K¨ ahler metrics on crepant resolutions of K¨ ahler cones”. Mathematische Annalen347.3 (Nov. 2009), 581–611.issn: 1432-1807

    2009

  33. [41]

    Calabi-Yau structures and Einstein-Sasakian structures on crepant reso- lutions of isolated singularities

    R. Goto. “Calabi-Yau structures and Einstein-Sasakian structures on crepant reso- lutions of isolated singularities”.Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan64.3 (2012), pp. 1005 –1052

    2012

  34. [42]

    The Positive Action Conjecture and Asymptotically Euclidean Metrics in Quantum Gravity

    G. W. Gibbons and C. N. Pope. “The Positive Action Conjecture and Asymptotically Euclidean Metrics in Quantum Gravity”.Commun. Math. Phys.66 (1979), pp. 267– 290

    1979

  35. [43]

    Calabi-Yau metrics on canonical bundles of complex flag manifolds

    E. M. Correa and L. Grama. “Calabi-Yau metrics on canonical bundles of complex flag manifolds”.Journal of Algebra527 (2019), pp. 109–135.issn: 0021-8693

    2019

  36. [44]

    Twistor forms on K¨ ahler manifolds

    A. Moroianu and U. Semmelmann. “Twistor forms on K¨ ahler manifolds”. en.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di ScienzeSer. 5, 2.4 (2003), pp. 823– 845

    2003

  37. [45]

    Kerr-de Sitter black holes with NUT charges

    W. Chen, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope. “Kerr-de Sitter black holes with NUT charges”. Nucl. Phys. B762 (2007), pp. 38–54. arXiv:hep-th/0601002

    2007 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ricci-flat metrics on the cone overCP 2#CP2

    D. Bykov. “Ricci-flat metrics on the cone overCP 2#CP2” (Dec. 2017). arXiv:1712. 07227 [hep-th]

    2017

  39. [47]

    All Toric K¨ ahler Surfaces with Twistor 2-Forms

    S. G. Ovchinnikov. “All Toric K¨ ahler Surfaces with Twistor 2-Forms”.Commun. Math. Phys.406.12 (2025), p. 291. arXiv:2412.21114 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    New N = (2,2) vector multiplets

    U. Lindstrom, M. Rocek, I. Ryb, R. von Unge, and M. Zabzine. “New N = (2,2) vector multiplets”.JHEP08 (2007), p. 008. arXiv:0705.3201 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  41. [49]

    T-duality for toric manifolds inN“ p2,2qsuperspace

    D. Bykov, S. Kutsubin, and A. Kuzovchikov. “T-duality for toric manifolds inN“ p2,2qsuperspace” (Dec. 2025). arXiv:2512.24726 [hep-th]

    2025

  42. [50]

    The Large Vector Multiplet and Gauging p2,2qσ-models

    D. Bykov, U. Lindstr¨ om, and M. Roˇ cek. “The Large Vector Multiplet and Gauging p2,2qσ-models” (May 2026). arXiv:2605.18536 [hep-th]

    2026 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Twisted Multiplets and New Supersym- metric Nonlinear Sigma Models

    S. J. Gates Jr., C. M. Hull, and M. Rocek. “Twisted Multiplets and New Supersym- metric Nonlinear Sigma Models”.Nucl. Phys. B248 (1984), pp. 157–186

    1984

  44. [52]

    Nonabelian Gener- alized Gauge Multiplets

    U. Lindstrom, M. Rocek, I. Ryb, R. von Unge, and M. Zabzine. “Nonabelian Gener- alized Gauge Multiplets”.JHEP02 (2009), p. 020. arXiv:0808.1535 [hep-th]. 45

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Improved Methods for Supergraphs

    M. T. Grisaru, W. Siegel, and M. Rocek. “Improved Methods for Supergraphs”.Nucl. Phys. B159 (1979), p. 429

    1979

  46. [54]

    Quantum Corrections and Extended Supersymmetry in NewσMod- els

    T. H. Buscher. “Quantum Corrections and Extended Supersymmetry in NewσMod- els”.Phys. Lett. B159 (1985), pp. 127–130

    1985

  47. [55]

    Path Integral Derivation of Quantum Duality in Nonlinear Sigma Models

    T. H. Buscher. “Path Integral Derivation of Quantum Duality in Nonlinear Sigma Models”.Phys. Lett. B201 (1988), pp. 466–472

    1988

  48. [56]

    Duality, quotients, and currents

    M. Roˇ cek and E. P. Verlinde. “Duality, quotients, and currents”.Nucl. Phys. B373 (1992), pp. 630–646. arXiv:hep-th/9110053

    1992 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Towards mirror symmetry as duality for two- dimensional abelian gauge theories

    D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser. “Towards mirror symmetry as duality for two- dimensional abelian gauge theories”.Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46 (1996). Ed. by I. Bars, P. Bouwknegt, J. Minahan, D. Nemeschansky, K. Pilch, H. Saleur, and N. P. Warner, pp. 177–186. arXiv:hep-th/9508107

    1996 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Mirror symmetry

    K. Hori and C. Vafa. “Mirror symmetry” (Feb. 2000). arXiv:hep-th/0002222

    2000 arXiv

  51. [59]

    New SupersymmetricσModels With Wess- Zumino Terms

    T. Buscher, U. Lindstrom, and M. Rocek. “New SupersymmetricσModels With Wess- Zumino Terms”.Phys. Lett. B202 (1988), pp. 94–98. 46

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.