Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

On the Importance of Geometric Nonlinearity and Temperature-Dependent Properties in Multi-Material Thermo-Mechanical Topology Optimization

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Geometric nonlinearity—not temperature-dependent properties—is the decisive modeling choice in thermo-mechanical topology optimization, because small-strain kinematics mistakes rotation for compressive strain.

desk verdict A careful computational study that cleanly separates constitutive-law from property-model error in thermo-mechanical TO; the Hencky machinery and cross-evaluation protocol are solid, but the elastic no-creep premise at 1073 K limits the external validity of the payoff claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10344 v2 pith:QN5K6AO5 submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CEcs.LG

Shirin Hosseinmardi , Xiangyu Sun , Ramin Bostanabad This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.CEcs.LG
keywords topologyoptimizationthermo-mechanicaldesigngeometricnonlinearitytemperature-dependentpropertiescompliantmechanismsHenckylogarithmicstrainphysics-informedmachinelearningmanufacturabilityconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Thermally actuated micro-devices are usually designed with small-strain linear elasticity and constant material properties. This paper asks how much each assumption distorts the design, and answers with a controlled factorial comparison: the same thermal actuator and gripper are optimized at 673, 873, and 1073 K under a baseline model and a full-physics model, then every converged design is re-evaluated with verified nonlinear finite element solvers under all four combinations of constitutive law and property model. The decisive modeling error is geometric nonlinearity: these devices work as linkages, and small-strain kinematics charges rotation itself as a spurious compressive strain comparable to the thermal eigenstrain that drives the device. Temperature-dependent properties, by contrast, change strokes by less than one percent once constant properties are anchored at the design temperature. Designing with the full physics yields consistently stronger and more temperature-robust devices at about 1.4 times the design-time cost.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quadratic-Hencky strain-energy density with an exact additive thermal split. Because isotropic thermal expansion factors into $F = F_e(\vartheta I)$ and that factor commutes with the elastic distortion, the logarithmic strain obeys $\ln U = \ln U_e + \varepsilon_{\mathrm{th}} I$; the elastic log strain is the total log strain minus an isotropic eigenstrain, exactly and at any deformation. This makes the linear and Hencky energies formally identical except for the strain measure, so the comparison isolates the constitutive law. The paper also uses a closed-form, eigendecomposition-free parameterization of the 2D logarithmic strain and a three-term void interpolation that cancels spurious pure-eigenstrain energy at zero density, which keeps finite-strain optimization stable and differentiable for adjoint sensitivities.

What would settle it

Re-evaluate the same sixty categorical designs at 1073 K with a rate-dependent (creep or plasticity) solver: if the best linear-designed layout overtakes the best Hencky-designed layout under that judge, the central claim holds only in the rate-independent elastic regime; if the Hencky layouts still win, the ranking is robust to inelasticity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the constitutive law, not the property model, is the decisive modeling choice in multi-material thermo-mechanical topology optimization. Using a quadratic-Hencky (logarithmic-strain) formulation whose isotropic thermal eigenstrain admits an exact additive split in log-strain space, together with temperature-dependent conductivity, expansion, and moduli for a titanium–copper–steel system, the paper optimizes a thermal actuator and a thermal gripper at three design temperatures under both a baseline and a full-physics model. Cross-evaluating all sixty categorical designs under the full factorial $\{\text{linear}, \text{Hencky}\} \times \{\text{constant}, \text{temperature-dependent}\}$, the constitutive-law effect grows from 2–3% of stroke at 673 K to 8–11% at 1073 K, while the property effect stays below 0.31% and the interaction below 0.25% of the reference stroke. The error concentrates on rotation-rich layouts: a pure rotation by $\theta$ carries a spurious compressive normal strain $-\theta^2/2$ in linear kinematics, comparable to the thermal eigenstrain at the observed hinge rotations. Because a linear optimizer steers away from the rotation-rich mechanisms that would expose this bias, it can misjudge its own designs by only about 1% while misjudging the best rotation-exploiting designs by up to 34%, making the model deceptively appear trustworthy.

Load-bearing premise

Rate-independent elasticity with no creep or plasticity is assumed for the entire comparison, although copper at 1073 K operates near 0.8 of its melting temperature; the paper restricts the devices to short, intermittent actuation cycles to justify this regime.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optimization routines for thermally actuated compliant mechanisms should adopt finite-strain kinematics; the upgrade costs about 1.4 times the design time and returns 4–12% more best-design stroke.
  • Anchoring constant properties at the design temperature is a defensible approximation for conduction-dominated devices with small spatial temperature variation; full temperature dependence buys under one percent of stroke in these cases.
  • A linear model's self-assessment can be dangerously misleading: it can appear trustworthy by avoiding rotation-rich layouts, so designs should be audited with an independent high-fidelity re-evaluation.
  • Best designs trained at a moderate temperature (873 K) transfer well to other operating temperatures because the stroke response is nearly affine in temperature; re-optimizing at every operating point with a rougher high-temperature landscape is not necessary.
  • Multiple random starts are essential for both physics models because the simultaneous thermo-mechanical design landscape is rough and some seeds collapse to inferior mechanisms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The additive log-strain split should transfer to other eigenstrain-driven design problems, such as swelling or phase-transformation actuation, where the same algebra would isolate the kinematics from the eigenstrain.
  • The near-zero property effect is tied to the mild temperature field (the solid stays within roughly 60 K of the design temperature); devices with substantially larger thermal gradients, or properties anchored at room temperature, would likely show a larger property effect.
  • If creep or plasticity were included, the ranking at 1073 K could change, since copper operates near 0.8 of its melting temperature; the paper's controlled comparison bounds the rate-independent elastic regime only.
  • The self-validation failure suggests a general audit principle: any optimizer built on a biased forward model should validate with an independent high-fidelity solver rather than its own predictions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper quantifies the separate and joint effects of two modeling assumptions in multi-material thermo-mechanical topology optimization: small-strain linear elasticity versus finite-strain quadratic-Hencky kinematics, and design-temperature-anchored constant properties versus fully temperature-dependent properties for a Ti-Cu-Steel system. The authors extend their physics-informed Gaussian-process framework to include finite-strain kinematics, exact additive thermal eigenstrain in logarithmic strain space, temperature-dependent conductivities/expansion/moduli, and manufacturability constraints. They optimize a thermal actuator and a thermal gripper at three design temperatures (673, 873, 1073 K) with five seeds per family, producing 60 designs. Every converged categorical design is re-evaluated by independent finite-element solvers under the full 2x2 factorial of constitutive law and property model, with analytical patch tests quoted at 1e-10 relative error. The main results are that the constitutive-law choice dominates the property model (property effects below 0.31% of the reference stroke), that linear kinematics mistakes rigid rotation for compressive strain and hence increasingly underpredicts stroke as temperature and rotation content grow, that best-of-five Hencky-designed layouts beat linear-designed layouts by 4-12% under the reference judge, and that the full-physics designs are more temperature-robust, with moderate-temperature training transferring best.

Significance. If the conclusions hold under service conditions, this is a valuable and overdue quantitative comparison for thermo-mechanical topology optimization of compliant mechanisms. The strongest parts of the paper are the controlled cross-evaluation protocol (all 60 designs re-solved under all four physics models by an independent solver), the machine-verifiable patch tests, and the elementary but correct kinematic explanation of the constitutive-law error, which cleanly explains the temperature trend and why the error concentrates on rotation-rich layouts. The practical guidance (anchor constant properties at the design temperature, adopt finite-strain kinematics for rotation-based mechanisms, and audit design tools by independent high-fidelity re-evaluation) is actionable. The main limitation is that the reference physics remains rate-independent elasticity at homologous temperatures up to 0.8 of copper's melting point; the magnitude of the reported payoffs outside that regime, particularly under creep or yielding, is not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Section 4] The operating-regime assumption in Section 2.3 (the metals would creep under sustained load, so the devices operate intermittently in short cycles where the rate-independent elastic response of Eqs. (5)-(6) applies) is load-bearing for the central quantitative claims, but it is not tested. At T_D=1073 K, copper operates near 0.8 of its melting temperature, and Section 3.3 shows that the deformation concentrates in compliant hinges with rotations up to about 8 degrees; a yield or creep check (for example, a simple von Mises stress estimate from the converged Hencky solutions) is needed to support the assertion that hinge stresses remain in the rate-independent elastic regime even for short cycles. Without such a check, the reported 8-11% constitutive-law effect and the 4-12% design-time payoff are established only within the rate-independent elastic model, and the abstract's statement that full-physics designs are stronger and more temperature-robust overreaches. The authors should either add a stress/yield estimate or explicitly scope all conclusions to the rate-independent, no-creep regime.
  2. [Section 3.4 and Table 1] The design-time payoff of 4-12% is computed from the best seed of each five-seed family, but several families have seed-to-seed standard deviations comparable to or larger than the reported margin; for example, the actuator at 673 K has a standard deviation of about 2 micrometers on a stroke of about 13 micrometers, and the gripper at 873 and 1073 K has standard deviations of 2.4-3.2 micrometers on strokes of 15-21 micrometers. With only five seeds, the best-of-five difference is an order statistic, and it is not shown to be statistically significant at every device-temperature combination. The paper should report the distribution of the per-seed payoff (for instance, paired differences or bootstrap intervals over the seeds) or soften the 'consistently stronger' claim to reflect the sampling uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.5, Eq. (14)] The symbol 'Tλ' in the source term of Eq. (14) is easy to misread as a product T·λ; consider denoting this adjoint-weighted eigenstrain term with a notation such as τ_λ or S_λ to match the modulus-path term S_λ.
  2. [Section 3.4, Fig. 9] The caption of Fig. 9 should state explicitly that the 'best' design is the best of five seeds and that no uncertainty is shown for these point values; as printed, the numbers read as deterministic outcomes rather than order statistics from a small seed ensemble.
  3. [Section 2.3] The paper acknowledges that published steel expansion data disagree by 10-15% above 600 K, but the gripper jaw is prescribed to be steel; a short statement on whether the reported gripper results are sensitive to this property uncertainty would improve the reproducibility of the conclusions.
  4. [Abstract and Section 4] The term 'full physics' is used to mean the upgraded model, but the model is still rate-independent and steady-state; adding a qualifier such as 'within the present rate-independent, steady-conduction setting' would align the abstract and conclusion with the scope limitations stated at the end of Section 4.
  5. [Figure 4] The material legend 'Cu Ti Steel void' is not in a natural reading order; listing the colors as 'void, Ti, Steel, Cu' or matching the legend order to the typical phase order would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the comparison is cross-evaluated by a standalone FE solver, property inputs are external fits, and the reference-judge verdict is explicitly conditional rather than a definitional tautology.

full rationale

The paper's central comparison is not circular. The temperature-dependent property polynomials are least-squares fits to published external measurements (TPRC/Touloukian, Chang & Himmel, Dever, Fisher & Renken, Incropera), and the constant-property baseline is deliberately chosen as the strongest convention: Eq. (12) defines a secant expansion coefficient so the two property models coincide exactly at T_D, and the measured property effect (at most about 0.31% of reference stroke) is an output of the thermal analysis, not an input assumption. The constitutive-law comparison is likewise computed: all sixty converged designs are frozen to categorical material maps and re-solved by a standalone finite-element evaluator under all four models, so neither family is judged solely by its own training objective; the fact that linear judges sometimes rank the baseline design first at 1073 K shows the reference-judge verdict is a conditional model comparison rather than a forced tautology. The Hencky-versus-linear kinematic difference is a mathematical property of the strain measures, but the paper's quantitative claims (evaluation error growing from 2-3% at 673 K to 8-11% at 1073 K, and 4-12% design-time payoff) are measured from the optimized layouts rather than assumed. Self-citations to the authors' prior PIGP/PGCAN work document the ML parameterization, but they are not load-bearing: the conclusions are re-verified by independent FE solves and do not rest on any unverified uniqueness or equivalence theorem from those papers. The acknowledged omission of plasticity and creep at copper's 0.8 Tm is a modeling assumption and a scoping limitation, not a circular step; it belongs to correctness risk rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computational study rests on a long list of modeling choices and hyperparameters. None are invented physical entities, but the quantitative effect sizes are conditional on the chosen spring, heat sink, mass budget, filter radius, and property fits. The most fragile premise is the rate-independent elastic reference model at high homologous temperatures. The property polynomials are external calibrations, so they do not create circularity, but their uncertainty is not propagated.

free parameters (8)
  • Property-fit polynomial coefficients (3 phases x 3 properties) = Table 2
    Constrained least-squares fits to published TPRC/Touloukian and elastic-modulus data; external calibration, not fitted to the stroke results, but they determine the temperature dependence being tested.
  • Output spring stiffness Ks = 2000 N/m
    Chosen port reaction; no sensitivity study, so the reported gains and effect magnitudes are conditional on this load.
  • Volumetric heat sink qv = -4.5e-8 W/um^3
    Lumped heat loss to surroundings; sets the small internal temperature drop that makes the property-model effect small.
  • Mass budget fraction = 0.25
    Mass constraint imposed on all designs; controls material scarcity and topology.
  • Helmholtz filter radius = r=5 um
    Manufacturability feature-size parameter; shapes admissible layouts.
  • Interface-exclusion penalty weights and Heaviside parameters = omega_if max 5e6; beta 4 to 16; eta=0.30
    Hand-set continuation to prevent direct Ti-Steel contact; can eliminate some layouts before optimization.
  • Poisson ratio = 0.31 uniform
    Single value for all phases from literature; affects plane-stress stiffness.
  • SIMP penalization exponent = continuated 1 to 3
    Standard density interpolation; hand-chosen continuation schedule.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Plane-stress 2D, steady-state conduction, one-way thermal-mechanical coupling
    All results are for these idealized conditions; transients and out-of-plane effects excluded.
  • domain assumption Quadratic-Hencky energy is an accurate elastic model of metals at moderate elastic strains
    Basis for treating Hencky+T-dep as reference truth; supported by cited literature [32-34], not by experiments in this paper.
  • domain assumption No creep or plasticity; intermittent operation keeps response rate-independent
    Invoked in Sec. 2.3; fails near 0.8 homologous temperature for copper if actuation cycles are not short enough.
  • domain assumption Isotropic thermal expansion with commuting thermal stretch and exact additive split
    Eq. (7) relies on isotropy and proportionality of thermal stretch; the two models share this assumption.
  • domain assumption Polynomial property fits are representative of the materials over 293-1100 K
    Fits reproduce published anchors within 0.4%, but Steel CTE data disagree by 10-15% above 600 K, an unpropagated uncertainty.
  • domain assumption 200x100 FE grid and GP/PGCAN parameterizations resolve hinge rotations and phase boundaries
    Mesh convergence and ML solution accuracy are not demonstrated beyond internal patch tests.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Importance of Geometric Nonlinearity and Temperature-Dependent Properties in Multi-Material Thermo-Mechanical Topology Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QN5K6AO5

@misc{pith2026260810344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Importance of Geometric Nonlinearity and Temperature-Dependent Properties in Multi-Material Thermo-Mechanical Topology Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QN5K6AO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10344}
}
read the original abstract

Thermo-mechanical compliant devices are commonly designed with small-strain linear elasticity and temperature-independent material properties, even though they might operate hundreds of kelvin above ambient where both assumptions are questionable. In this work, we quantify the effect and cost of each assumption in multi-material topology optimization of thermally actuated compliant devices. To this end, we introduce a physics-informed, simultaneous analysis-and-design framework with (i) a finite-strain quadratic-Hencky (logarithmic-strain) constitutive model whose isotropic thermal eigenstrain admits an exact additive split in log-strain space, and (ii) temperature-dependent conductivity, thermal expansion, and elastic moduli for a titanium--copper--steel material system. We optimize a thermal actuator and a thermal gripper at three design temperatures under both a baseline model and the full physics, subject to mass and manufacturability constraints. Every converged design is re-evaluated by verified nonlinear finite element solvers in the full factorial of constitutive law and property model. The comparison between the two factors reveals that the constitutive law is the decisive modeling choice: These devices work as linkages where linear kinematics mistakes rotation for compressive strain; its error therefore grows with the design temperature and concentrates on the very layouts that exploit rotation best. Because a linear optimizer also steers away from the rotation-rich mechanisms that would expose this bias, the model can deceptively appear trustworthy when validated against its own designs. Designing with the full physics yields consistently stronger and more temperature-robust devices at a modest increase in design-time cost.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10344 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of m-PIGP framework: PGCAN-parameterized GP priors represent the primal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Design domains and boundary conditions for (a) the thermal actuator and (b) the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fitted temperature-dependent property factors for Ti, Cu, and Steel over the validity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Median-performing optimized designs (by u ref out among the five seeds) for the actuator (top two rows) and gripper (bottom two rows), for the baseline (linear + TD-anchored constant properties) and high-fidelity (Hencky + T-dependent properties) design families at the…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Optimization history of a representative high-fidelity run (actuator, Hencky + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross-evaluation of every design at its own design temperature: mean output stroke ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Factorial effects of the evaluation physics at the designs’ own [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Kinematic origin of the constitutive-law effect: (a) maximum displacement-gradient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Relative advantage of the best design of the high-fidelity family over the best design of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Temperature transferability of the best designs: the best design of every family (its best [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 71(2):197–224, 1988

    Martin Philip Bendsøe and Noboru Kikuchi. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 71(2):197–224, 1988

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Springer Berlin, 2004

    Martin P Bendsøe, Ole Sigmund, et al.Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications, volume 2. Springer Berlin, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review.Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 48(6):1031–1055, 2013

    Ole Sigmund and Kurt Maute. Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review.Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 48(6):1031–1055, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization.Journal of Structural Mechanics, 25(4):493–524, 1997

    Ole Sigmund. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization.Journal of Structural Mechanics, 25(4):493–524, 1997

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000.Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 49(1):1–38, 2014

    Joshua D Deaton and Ramana V Grandhi. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000.Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 49(1):1–38, 2014

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Compliant thermal microactuators.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 76(1-3):463–469, 1999

    Jacques Jonsmann, Ole Sigmund, and Siebe Bouwstra. Compliant thermal microactuators.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 76(1-3):463–469, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization–part i: One-material struc- tures.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 190(49-50):6577–6604, 2001

    Ole Sigmund. Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization–part i: One-material struc- tures.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 190(49-50):6577–6604, 2001

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Qi Xia, Liang Xia, and Tielin Shi. Topology optimization of thermal actuator and its support using the level set based multiple–type boundary method and sensitivity analysis based on constrained variational principle.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57(3):1317–1327, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Topology optimization for thermo-mechanical compliant actuators using mesh-free methods.Engineering Optimization, 41(8):753–772, 2009

    Yixian Du, Zhen Luo, Qihua Tian, and Liping Chen. Topology optimization for thermo-mechanical compliant actuators using mesh-free methods.Engineering Optimization, 41(8):753–772, 2009. 21

    2009

  2. [10]

    Wenjie Zuo and Kazuhiro Saitou. Multi-material topology optimization using ordered simp inter- polation: multi-material topology optimization using ordered simp.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55(2):477–491, 2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    Multi-material multi- physics topology optimization with physics-informed gaussian process priors.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 461:119163, 2026

    Xiangyu Sun, Shirin Hosseinmardi, Amin Yousefpour, and Ramin Bostanabad. Multi-material multi- physics topology optimization with physics-informed gaussian process priors.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 461:119163, 2026

    2026

  4. [12]

    Stiffness design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 19(2):93–104, 2000

    Thomas Buhl, Claus BW Pedersen, and Ole Sigmund. Stiffness design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 19(2):93–104, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    Topology synthesis of large-displacement compli- ant mechanisms.International Journal for numerical methods in engineering, 50(12):2683–2705, 2001

    Claus BW Pedersen, Thomas Buhl, and Ole Sigmund. Topology synthesis of large-displacement compli- ant mechanisms.International Journal for numerical methods in engineering, 50(12):2683–2705, 2001

    2001

  6. [14]

    Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 190(26-27):3443– 3459, 2001

    Tyler E Bruns and Daniel A Tortorelli. Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 190(26-27):3443– 3459, 2001

    2001

  7. [15]

    A novel topology design scheme for the multi-physics problems of electro-thermally actuated compliant micromechanisms.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 97:599– 609, 2002

    Luzhong Yin and Gi K Ananthasuresh. A novel topology design scheme for the multi-physics problems of electro-thermally actuated compliant micromechanisms.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 97:599– 609, 2002

    2002

  8. [16]

    Topology optimization of thermo-elastic structures with multiple materials under mass constraint.Computers & Structures, 173:150–160, 2016

    Tong Gao, Pengli Xu, and Weihong Zhang. Topology optimization of thermo-elastic structures with multiple materials under mass constraint.Computers & Structures, 173:150–160, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Stress-based design of thermal structures via topology optimization.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53(2):253–270, 2016

    Joshua D Deaton and Ramana V Grandhi. Stress-based design of thermal structures via topology optimization.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53(2):253–270, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Topology optimization under thermo-elastic buckling: Deng and suresh.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55(5):1759–1772, 2017

    Shiguang Deng and Krishnan Suresh. Topology optimization under thermo-elastic buckling: Deng and suresh.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55(5):1759–1772, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    Thermal conductivity of the elements.Journal of physical and chemical reference data, 1(2):279–421, 1972

    Cho Yen Ho, Reginald W Powell, and Peter E Liley. Thermal conductivity of the elements.Journal of physical and chemical reference data, 1(2):279–421, 1972

    1972

  12. [20]

    Y. S. Touloukian, R. K. Kirby, R. E. Taylor, and P. D. Desai.Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Volume 12: Thermal Expansion, Metallic Elements and Alloys. IFI/Plenum, New York, 1975

    1975

  13. [21]

    Temperature dependence of the elastic constants of cu, ag, and au above room temperature.Journal of Applied Physics, 37(9):3567–3572, 1966

    YA Chang and L Himmel. Temperature dependence of the elastic constants of cu, ag, and au above room temperature.Journal of Applied Physics, 37(9):3567–3572, 1966

    1966

  14. [22]

    Temperature dependence of the elastic constants inα-iron single crystals: relationship to spin order and diffusion anomalies.Journal of Applied Physics, 43(8):3293–3301, 1972

    DJ Dever. Temperature dependence of the elastic constants inα-iron single crystals: relationship to spin order and diffusion anomalies.Journal of Applied Physics, 43(8):3293–3301, 1972

    1972

  15. [23]

    Topology optimization of thermo- elastic structures with temperature-dependent material properties under large temperature gradient

    Lei Tang, Tong Gao, Weitao Zhang, Jun Zeng, and Weihong Zhang. Topology optimization of thermo- elastic structures with temperature-dependent material properties under large temperature gradient. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(19):4224–4253, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Thermoelastic topology optimization for structures with temperature-dependent material properties.Science China Technological Sciences, 66(12):3488–3503, 2023

    Jing Zheng, Xuanpei Rong, and Chao Jiang. Thermoelastic topology optimization for structures with temperature-dependent material properties.Science China Technological Sciences, 66(12):3488–3503, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    A multi-material topology optimization with temperature-dependent thermoelastic properties.Engineering Optimization, 54(12):2140–2155, 2022

    Yuan Chen, Lin Ye, YX Zhang, and Chunhui Yang. A multi-material topology optimization with temperature-dependent thermoelastic properties.Engineering Optimization, 54(12):2140–2155, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems

    Fengwen Wang, Boyan Stefanov Lazarov, Ole Sigmund, and Jakob Søndergaard Jensen. Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 276:453–472, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Level-set topology optimization considering nonlinear thermoelasticity.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 361:112735, 2020

    Hayoung Chung, Oded Amir, and H Alicia Kim. Level-set topology optimization considering nonlinear thermoelasticity.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 361:112735, 2020. 22

    2020

  20. [28]

    Topology opti- mization of thermo-hyperelastic structures utilizing inverse motion based form finding.Engineering Optimization, 55(1):110–124, 2023

    Qianqian Sui, Jun Yan, Zhirui Fan, Mathias Wallin, Matti Ristinmaa, and Bin Niu. Topology opti- mization of thermo-hyperelastic structures utilizing inverse motion based form finding.Engineering Optimization, 55(1):110–124, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Topol- ogy optimization of compliant mechanisms under transient thermal conditions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418:116478, 2024

    Gunnar Granlund, Mathias Wallin, Olov G¨ unther-Hanssen, Daniel Tortorelli, and Seth Watts. Topol- ogy optimization of compliant mechanisms under transient thermal conditions.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418:116478, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Convex topology optimization for hyperelastic trusses based on the ground-structure approach: Convex topology optimization for hyperelastic trusses based

    Adeildo S Ramos Jr and Glaucio H Paulino. Convex topology optimization for hyperelastic trusses based on the ground-structure approach: Convex topology optimization for hyperelastic trusses based. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51(2):287–304, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Moto: Topology optimization for large deformations via an implicit material point method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.14596, 2026

    Rahul Kumar Padhy, Aaditya Chandrasekhar, and Krishnan Suresh. Moto: Topology optimization for large deformations via an implicit material point method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.14596, 2026

    2026

  24. [32]

    Heinrich Hencky. Zur theorie plastischer deformationen und der hierdurch im material hervorgerufenen nachspannungen.ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift f¨ ur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 4(4):323–334, 1924

    1924

  25. [33]

    L. Anand. On h. hencky’s approximate strain-energy function for moderate deformations.Journal of Applied Mechanics, 46(1):78–82, 03 1979

    1979

  26. [34]

    The exponentiated hencky-logarithmic strain energy

    Patrizio Neff, Ionel-Dumitrel Ghiba, and Johannes Lankeit. The exponentiated hencky-logarithmic strain energy. part i: Constitutive issues and rank-one convexity.Journal of Elasticity, 121(2):143–234, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Accelerated topology optimization by means of deep learning.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62(3):1185–1212, 2020

    Nikos Ath Kallioras, Georgios Kazakis, and Nikos D Lagaros. Accelerated topology optimization by means of deep learning.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62(3):1185–1212, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Topologygan: Topology optimization using generative adversarial networks based on physical fields over the initial domain.Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(3):031715, 2021

    Zhenguo Nie, Tong Lin, Haoliang Jiang, and Levent Burak Kara. Topologygan: Topology optimization using generative adversarial networks based on physical fields over the initial domain.Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(3):031715, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, and George E Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations.Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    A gaussian process framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations

    Carlos Mora, Amin Yousefpour, Shirin Hosseinmardi, and Ramin Bostanabad. A gaussian process framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Computational Mechanics, 75(4):1213–1239, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Simultaneous and mesh- free topology optimization with physics-informed gaussian processes.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 437:117698, 2025

    Amin Yousefpour, Shirin Hosseinmardi, Carlos Mora, and Ramin Bostanabad. Simultaneous and mesh- free topology optimization with physics-informed gaussian processes.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 437:117698, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Compliance minimiza- tion via physics-informed gaussian processes: X

    Xiangyu Sun, Amin Yousefpour, Shirin Hosseinmardi, and Ramin Bostanabad. Compliance minimiza- tion via physics-informed gaussian processes: X. sun et al.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza- tion, 68(12):259, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Mehdi Shishehbor, Shirin Hosseinmardi, and Ramin Bostanabad. Parametric encoding with attention and convolution mitigate spectral bias of neural partial differential equation solvers.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 67(7):128, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Single-crystal elastic moduli and the hcp→bcc transformation in ti, zr, and hf.Physical review, 135(2A):A482, 1964

    ES Fisher and CJ Renken. Single-crystal elastic moduli and the hcp→bcc transformation in ti, zr, and hf.Physical review, 135(2A):A482, 1964

    1964

  35. [43]

    Incropera, David P

    Frank P. Incropera, David P. DeWitt, Theodore L. Bergman, and Adrienne S. Lavine.Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. John Wiley & Sons, 6th edition, 2007

    2007

  36. [44]

    Filters in topology optimization based on helmholtz-type differential equations.International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 86(6):765–781, 2011

    Boyan Stefanov Lazarov and Ole Sigmund. Filters in topology optimization based on helmholtz-type differential equations.International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 86(6):765–781, 2011. 23

    2011

  37. [45]

    Influence of intermetallic phase (tife) on the microstructural evolu- tion and mechanical properties of as-cast and quenched ti–mo–fe alloys.Scientific reports, 14(1):10461, 2024

    Nthabiseng Moshokoa, Elizabeth Makhatha, Lerato Raganya, Washington Makoana, Hasani Chauke, Ramogohlo Diale, and Maje Phasha. Influence of intermetallic phase (tife) on the microstructural evolu- tion and mechanical properties of as-cast and quenched ti–mo–fe alloys.Scientific...

    2024

  38. [46]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Jafari Ghalejooghi

    K. Jafari Ghalejooghi. Critical stress and energy barrier of dislocation motion in metals. Master’s thesis, UC Irvine, 2025. ProQuest ID: 32396617

    2025

  40. [48]

    torch-sla: Differentiable sparse linear algebra with adjoint solvers and sparse tensor parallelism for pytorch.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13994, 2026

    Mingyuan Chi and Shizheng Wen. torch-sla: Differentiable sparse linear algebra with adjoint solvers and sparse tensor parallelism for pytorch.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13994, 2026. 24

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.