REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 100 references
Exceptional activated mode theory for generalized real-complex transitions
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the real-to-complex threshold of a non-Hermitian family is set by the cheapest two-mode exceptional point among all reference pairs.
desk verdict A genuinely useful lower-envelope EP framework that nails three worked examples with exact numerics, but the 'arbitrarily large disturbances' generality claim outruns the paper's own two-mode validity criterion. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the exceptional activated mode: a candidate pair $(i,j)$ of reference eigenmodes whose projected $2\times2$ block $H^{\mathrm{EP}}_{ij}(\lambda)$ becomes degenerate under the perturbation $\lambda V$. The machinery is the discriminant condition of that block, which balances the reference detuning $\Delta E_{ij}$, the projected diagonal shift $\Delta D_{ij}$, and the biorthogonal off-diagonal product $A_{ij}B_{ji}=\mathrm{Tr}[P_i V P_j V]$, with $P_i$ the biorthogonal projector onto mode $i$. Each pair yields EP branches $\lambda^{(i,j)}_{c,\sigma}$, and the physical threshold is their lower envelope, equivalent to the ratio form $\lambda_c=\Delta_{\mathrm{act}}/G_{\mathrm{act}}$. A companion validity criterion controls the neglected admixture of remote modes: their second-order Feshbach correction must be small compared with the active scale at the EP, which is automatic when $\lambda_c$ itself is exponentially or algebraically small.
What would settle it
Compute the exact spectrum of a finite family $H(\lambda)=H_0+\lambda V$ engineered so that the first complex eigenvalue arises from a third-order exceptional point, and compare the numerical onset with the pairwise lower envelope $\min_{i<j}\lambda^{(i,j)}_c$; any mismatch at the onset falsifies the two-mode reduction. A broader check is to scan many sparse anti-Hermitian perturbations $V$ on a fixed real-spectrum $H_0$ and search for a case where the first collision involves non-adjacent or strongly admixed reference branches, whose exact threshold would test the boundary of the paper's validity criterion.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that a generic real-to-complex transition is governed by a single activated mode pair, rather than by the full spectrum. For $H(\lambda)=H_0+\lambda V$ with biorthogonal reference modes and real energies, each pair $(i,j)$ defines a $2\times 2$ active block whose off-diagonal entries are the projected couplings $\lambda V_{ij}$ and $\lambda V_{ji}$. The exceptional-point condition is the vanishing of the discriminant, $(\Delta E_{ij}+\lambda\Delta D_{ij})^2+4\lambda^2 V_{ij}V_{ji}=0$, producing two pair-resolved threshold branches $\lambda^{(i,j)}_{c,\sigma}$. The physical real-to-complex threshold is the smallest positive branch over all pairs, $\lambda_c=\min_{i<j}\lambda^{(i,j)}_c=\lambda^{(p,q)}_c$, which equals the ratio $\Delta_{\mathrm{act}}/G_{\mathrm{act}}$. The activated pair is selected by the smallest ratio of detuning to projected coupling, not by the smallest detuning. This is not a weak-coupling expansion: the active block's EP condition is solved exactly in $\lambda$, and the paper verifies the prediction against full numerical diagonalization at thresholds of order one.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the first real-to-complex transition is always a collision of exactly two reference branches, with all other modes contributing only a small correction; if a higher-order degeneracy or strong admixture from remote modes triggers the onset, the lower-envelope formula would not hold.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For the open coupled Hatano-Nelson ladder, the closed-form threshold Eq. (11) holds for every system size and connects the conventional exponentially small skin-overlap law, $\kappa L\gg1$, to the algebraic band-edge law, $\kappa L\ll1$, through the same activated pair $(1,2)$.
- Closing the ladder by boundary impurity bonds modifies only the reference data inside the same exceptional-point condition; as the reference approaches its own exceptional point, the threshold collapses linearly to zero because the active detuning vanishes as a square root while the projected activation strength diverges with the inverse square root.
- In a Hermitian SSH chain with reflection-related local gain and loss, the activated channel can switch from the topological edge pair to a bulk pair as the defect position changes, with no change in any topological invariant; the edge-channel threshold scales as $\lambda_c\sim |w| r^{L-2m+2}$.
- Since the threshold is a ratio of detuning to projected coupling, different microscopic mechanisms produce the same threshold law whenever their detuning and coupling exponents differ by the same amount, so scaling laws are organized by ratios rather than by individual exponents.
- The whole construction requires no parity-time symmetry or any other symmetry: a real-spectrum reference and weak remote-mode admixture at onset suffice.
Reading between the lines
- Beyond the paper, the lower-envelope principle suggests a practical design rule: spatial shaping of $V$ can switch the activated channel by changing $G_{\mathrm{act}}$ without moving reference energies, allowing controlled switching of amplification channels in finite non-Hermitian devices.
- Beyond the paper, the same ratio logic implies that threshold predictions for new platforms reduce to a finite enumeration over reference pairs, so the method could be exported to disordered or networked systems where a real-spectrum reference is available.
- Beyond the paper, a natural stress test is to engineer a family whose first complex eigenvalue comes from a simultaneous three-branch coalescence; the paper's spectral-adjacency condition already flags such cases, but an exact higher-order activated-mode extension would be needed there.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes an “exceptional activated mode” framework for the location of the real-to-complex spectral threshold in finite non-Hermitian families H(λ)=H0+λV. For each biorthogonal reference pair (i,j) it defines a 2×2 projected block, solves its exceptional-point condition exactly in λ, and declares the physical threshold to be the lower envelope of the pair-resolved thresholds, λ_c=min_{i<j} λ_c^(i,j), written in the transparent form λ_c=Δ_act/G_act. The framework is applied to three models: the critically non-Hermitian skin effect in coupled Hatano–Nelson chains under open boundary conditions, an impurity-closed version of the same ladder, and a Hermitian SSH chain with reflection-related local gain and loss. In each case the analytical thresholds are compared with full exact diagonalization; the agreement is excellent and no parameter is fitted to the numerical data.
Significance. If the central lower-envelope claim is valid in the stated generality, the paper provides a useful and non-perturbative unification: the cNHSE crossover from exponential to algebraic scaling, the impurity-driven switching of the active mode pair, and the edge-to-bulk activation without a topological transition are all described by the same pair-resolved exceptional-point minimization. The strengths of the paper are its explicit exact algebra in Eqs. (2)–(7), the absence of any fitted parameter, and the systematic benchmarking against full spectra in Figs. 2–3 and S1. The main weakness is that the general claim for “arbitrarily large disturbances” is not supported by a proof of the two-mode reduction at order-one λ_c; the paper’s own validity criterion is small-λ_c controlled, and the order-one regime is only validated a posteriori in one example. This gap is load-bearing for the paper’s universality claim, though not for the specific examples presented.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract, Eq. (6), and SM S2] The general claim λ_c=min_{i<j} λ_c^(i,j) for “arbitrarily large disturbances” is not proven for λ_c=O(1). The paper’s own validity criterion, SM S2 Eq. (S13), states that the two-mode reduction is controlled when λ_c C_pq / sqrt(-A_pq B_qp) << 1, which is automatically satisfied only when λ_c itself is small. In the analytic examples λ_c is exponentially or algebraically small in L, so Eq. (S13) supplies a parametric control. The order-one regime in Sec. S1 is explicitly described by the text as “not covered by this small-λc scaling argument” and is validated a posteriori against full diagonalization for a few small sizes. That is numerical evidence, not a proof that the lower envelope of two-mode exceptional points persists for arbitrary λ_c. Either supply a bound on the remote-mode correction that is valid for λ_c=O(1), or revise the abstract and the surrounding statements to state that the general principle is proved in the small-λ_c regime and otherwise is a numerically verified conjecture.
- [End Matter Sec. I and SM S2] The framework assumes that the first real-to-complex transition is an isolated second-order EP of exactly two reference branches. This is stated rather than proved: the text says “Generically, this first collision EP is a two-branch coalescence; higher-order degeneracies correspond to remote-mode corrections,” and End Matter Sec. I adds that violation of the admissibility conditions is a “diagnostic that the activated sector exceeds two dimensions.” That is a definitional classification, not a mathematical exclusion. Three or more coalescing levels can produce a real-to-complex transition while every pair-resolved discriminant remains positive, in which case Eq. (6) is not the correct threshold. The manuscript should either prove a genericity statement under explicit assumptions on H0 and V, or clearly restrict the central theorem to the case of an isolated pairwise coalescence and state that higher-order EPs are outside the demonstrated scope.
- [SM S3 and Eq. (11)] The derivation of the closed-form cNHSE threshold Eq. (11) relies on proving that the minimizing pair is (1,2) (together with its reflected partner), but the proof in SM S3 is incomplete. Equation (S41) shows that among fixed low-lying indices the pair (1,2) has the smallest detuning factor, and the text states that “direct finite-sum minimization of Eq. (S24) confirms this selection for the parameter regime used in the numerical comparison.” This does not provide a global analytic inequality over all L(L−1)/2 pairs, so the claim that Eq. (11) is the exact threshold for all L and κ is not fully established. The numerical agreement is strong, but if the closed-form expression is presented as an exact result, a rigorous global bound on min_{i<j} λ_c^(i,j) is needed, or the statement should be softened to an empirically verified selection in the displayed parameter regime.
minor comments (4)
- [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo “atallsystem sizes”; it should read “at all system sizes.”
- [SM S3] There is an unresolved cross-reference “Eq. (??)” in the sentence about the reflected partner (L−1,L); this should be replaced with the actual equation number for the reflection symmetry, Eq. (S34).
- [SM S1 and Fig. S1] Since the order-one λ_c benchmark is the main evidence for the non-perturbative character of the method, it would be helpful to state the values of L used in Fig. S1 directly in the caption and to report the maximum relative deviation between λ_c^num and the lower-envelope prediction.
- [End Matter Sec. IV and Eq. (29)] The notation λ^(p,q)_c in Eq. (29) is introduced only in the End Matter; for readability it should be explicitly tied to Eq. (6), or the pair superscript should be defined in the sentence preceding Eq. (29).
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the derivation takes H0 and V as fixed inputs, solves EP discriminants analytically, and validates against independent full-spectrum numerics.
full rationale
The paper's central quantities—the pair-resolved thresholds of Eq. (5) and the lower-envelope formula λ_c = min_{i<j} λ_c^(i,j) of Eq. (6)—are derived from the input operators H0 and V via the exact discriminant of the projected 2x2 block. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted: the threshold is obtained algebraically from matrix elements of V and the biorthogonal reference modes, and then compared with full numerical diagonalization of the original 2L×2L Hamiltonian. The examples therefore serve as external benchmarks rather than inputs. The two-mode reduction is explicitly discussed as an approximation governed by the Feshbach criterion in SM Eq. (S13), and the paper acknowledges that the reduction is validated a posteriori rather than derived in the O(1) coupling regime (SM S1–S2). That is a limitation on the proof of generality, not circularity. Self-citations in the reference list are background citations for established phenomena (critical NHSE, PT symmetry, etc.) and are not load-bearing for the derivation; no uniqueness theorem or prior result by the same authors is invoked to force the central formula. The central claim may be only conditionally established for order-one λ_c, but the reviewer's skeptic concern is an unproven two-branch assumption, which is a correctness or rigor issue, not a reduction of the prediction to its own inputs. The output is self-contained against independent numerical benchmarks, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption H0 is diagonalizable with a real spectrum in the spectral window of interest, and the first real-to-complex collision is a two-branch exceptional point.
- domain assumption Spectral adjacency: at an isolated second-order EP, the two coalescing branches must be adjacent in the ordered reference spectrum.
- domain assumption Remote reference modes contribute only a small Feshbach correction, controlled by λ_c C_pq / sqrt(-A_pq B_qp) << 1 (Eq. S13).
- standard math Sign condition A_ij B_ji < 0 with real projected elements; otherwise no real positive threshold exists.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Exceptional activated mode theory for generalized real-complex transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MXKQOFJN
@misc{pith2026260812475,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Exceptional activated mode theory for generalized real-complex transitions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MXKQOFJN}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12475}
}
read the original abstract
Real-to-complex spectral transitions mark the onset of amplification in non-Hermitian systems, but their thresholds are often treated as model-specific quantities. Here we develop a general, non-perturbative activated-mode principle that governs the real-to-complex threshold across broad classes of non-Hermitian systems. A central insight is that only a small Hilbert subspace is ``activated" at the transition onset, which can be variationally determined through the competition between spectral detuning and mode-level projected non-Hermitian couplings. The result is a closed-form exceptional-activation condition for arbitrarily large ``disturbances", rather than a perturbative estimate. We apply our framework to three contrasting illustrative problems, establishing (i) a closed-form threshold for critical non-Hermitian skin amplification at \emph{all} system sizes; (ii) a new link between impurity tunneling threshold and exceptional point switching; and (iii) activation channel switching without underlying topological phase transition. Overall, our findings recast real-to-complex transitions as generic mode-selection problems independent of any specific symmetry.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Physical Review Letters80, 5243 (1998)
1998
-
[2]
C. E. R¨ uter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics, Nature Physics6, 192 (2010)
2010
-
[3]
L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian pho- tonics based on parity-time symmetry, Nature Photonics 11, 752 (2017)
2017
-
[4]
Hodaei, M.-A
H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time- symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)
2014
-
[5]
K.¨Ozdemir, S
S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity- time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Na- ture Materials18, 783 (2019)
2019
-
[6]
X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang, PT-symmetric acoustics, Physical Review X4, 031042 (2014)
2014
-
[7]
Fleury, D
R. Fleury, D. Sounas, and A. Al` u, An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nature Commu- nications6, 5905 (2015)
2015
-
[8]
Brandenbourger, X
M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials, Nature Communications10, 4608 (2019)
2019
Show all 100 references
-
[9]
Ghatak, M
A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk-edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 29561 (2020)
2020
-
[10]
Scheibner, W
C. Scheibner, W. T. M. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, Non- Hermitian band topology and skin modes in active elastic media, Physical Review Letters125, 118001 (2020). 6
2020
-
[11]
Helbig, T
T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nature Physics16, 747 (2020)
2020
-
[12]
Hofmann, T
T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Reciprocal skin effect and its realization in a topolectrical circuit, Physical Review Research2, 023265 (2020)
2020
-
[13]
Sahin, M
H. Sahin, M. Jalil, and C. H. Lee, Topolectrical cir- cuits—recent experimental advances and developments, APL Electronic Devices1(2025)
2025
-
[14]
J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking transitions in a dissipative floquet system of ultracold atoms, Nature Communications10, 855 (2019)
2019
-
[15]
S. Lapp, J. Ang’ong’a, and B. Gadway, Engineering tun- able local loss in a synthetic lattice of momentum states, New Journal of Physics21, 045006 (2019)
2019
-
[16]
Z. Ren, D. Liu, E. Zhao, C. He, K. K. Pak, J. Li, and G.-B. Jo, Chiral control of quantum states in non- Hermitian spin-orbit-coupled fermions, Nature Physics 18, 385 (2022)
2022
-
[17]
Liang, D
Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic signatures of non-Hermitian skin effect and topology in ultracold atoms, Physical Re- view Letters129, 070401 (2022)
2022
-
[18]
Murugan and S
A. Murugan and S. Vaikuntanathan, Topologically pro- tected modes in non-equilibrium stochastic systems, Na- ture Communications8, 13881 (2017)
2017
-
[19]
E. Tang, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Topol- ogy protects chiral edge currents in stochastic systems, Physical Review X11, 031015 (2021)
2021
-
[20]
Yang and C
M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Percolation-inducedPTsymme- try breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136602 (2024)
2024
-
[21]
Ashida, Z
Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020)
2020
-
[22]
E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 015005 (2021)
2021
-
[23]
El-Ganainy, K
R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics14, 11 (2018)
2018
-
[24]
W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 444016 (2012)
2012
-
[25]
Miri and A
M.-A. Miri and A. Al` u, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)
2019
-
[26]
H. Meng, Y. S. Ang, and C. H. Lee, Exceptional points in non-hermitian systems: Applications and recent de- velopments, Applied Physics Letters124(2024)
2024
-
[27]
Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian SSH model, Physical Review B97, 045106 (2018)
S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian SSH model, Physical Review B97, 045106 (2018)
2018
-
[28]
Weimann, M
S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Sza- meit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity-time-symmetric crystals, Nature Materials16, 433 (2017)
2017
-
[29]
L. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Mu, and J. Gong, Critical non- Hermitian skin effect, Nature Communications11, 5491 (2020)
2020
-
[30]
C.-H. Liu, K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and S. Chen, Helical damp- ing and dynamical critical skin effect in open quantum systems, Physical Review Research2, 043167 (2020)
2020
-
[31]
Yokomizo, T
K. Yokomizo, T. Yoda, and S. Murakami, Non-Hermitian waves in a continuous periodic model and application to photonic crystals, Physical Review Research4, 023089 (2022)
2022
-
[32]
F. Qin, Y. Ma, R. Shen, and C. H. Lee, Universal com- petitive spectral scaling from the critical non-Hermitian skin effect, Physical Review B107, 155430 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Y. Qin, Y. S. Ang, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Anyon-induced criticality and dynamical stability in non-hermitian many-body systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17494 (2026)
2026
-
[34]
Malzard, C
S. Malzard, C. Poli, and H. Schomerus, Topologically protected defect states in open photonic systems with non-Hermitian charge-conjugation and parity-time sym- metry, Physical Review Letters115, 200402 (2015)
2015
-
[35]
Leykam, K
D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological num- bers in non-Hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters 118, 040401 (2017)
2017
-
[36]
X. Ni, D. Smirnova, A. Poddubny, D. Leykam, Y. Chong, and A. B. Khanikaev,PTphase transitions of edge states atPTsymmetric interfaces in non-Hermitian topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B98, 165129 (2018)
2018
-
[37]
Yang and C
M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Beyond symmetry protection: Robust feedback-enforced edge states in non-Hermitian stacked quantum spin Hall systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17295 10.48550/arXiv.2507.17295 (2025)
2025 doi
-
[38]
Garmon and G
S. Garmon and G. Ordonez, Characteristic dynamics near two coalescing eigenvalues incorporating continuum threshold effects, Journal of Mathematical Physics58, 062101 (2017)
2017
-
[39]
D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 035305 (2014)
2014
-
[40]
Demange and E.-M
G. Demange and E.-M. Graefe, Signatures of three coa- lescing eigenfunctions, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical45, 025303 (2012)
2012
-
[41]
Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics07, 1191 (2010)
A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics07, 1191 (2010)
2010
-
[42]
Yokomizo and S
K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters123, 066404 (2019)
2019
-
[43]
Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-bloch band theory in non-Hermitian topological systems, Physical Review Letters125, 226402 (2020)
2020
-
[44]
Yao and Z
S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters 121, 086803 (2018)
2018
-
[45]
Zhang, G
X. Zhang, G. Li, Y. Liu, T. Tai, R. Thomale, and C. H. Lee, Tidal surface states as fingerprints of non-hermitian nodal knot metals, Communications Physics4, 47 (2021)
2021
-
[46]
Zhang, Q
B. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Zhang, and C. H. Lee, Real non- hermitian energy spectra without any symmetry, Chinese Physics B31, 070308 (2022)
2022
-
[47]
R. Yang, J. W. Tan, T. Tai, J. M. Koh, L. Li, S. Longhi, and C. H. Lee, Designing non-hermitian real spectra through electrostatics, Science Bulletin67, 1865 (2022)
2022
-
[48]
Yokomizo and S
K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch bands in two- dimensional non-hermitian systems, Physical Review B 107, 195112 (2023)
2023
-
[49]
Z. Lei, C. H. Lee, and L. Li, Activating non-hermitian skin modes by parity-time symmetry breaking, Commu- 7 nications Physics7, 100 (2024)
2024
-
[50]
H. Meng, Y. S. Ang, and C. H. Lee, Generalized brillouin zone fragmentation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13275 (2025)
2025
-
[51]
F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters121, 026808 (2018)
2018
-
[52]
Okuma, K
N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys- ical Review Letters124, 086801 (2020)
2020
-
[53]
D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Physical Re- view Letters124, 056802 (2020)
2020
-
[54]
See Supplemental Material for the large-coupling bench- mark, the selection of the local cNHSE activated channel, and the scale-free impurity-ring derivation
-
[55]
Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)
N. Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)
2011
-
[56]
Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Clas- sics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1995)
T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Clas- sics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1995)
1995
-
[57]
Hatano and D
N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Physical Review Letters77, 570 (1996)
1996
-
[58]
Hatano and D
N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non- Hermitian quantum mechanics, Physical Review B56, 8651 (1997)
1997
-
[59]
Zhang, Z
K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Physical Review Letters125, 126402 (2020)
2020
-
[60]
Zhang, Z
K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Universal non- Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions, Na- ture Communications13, 2496 (2022)
2022
-
[61]
Y.-C. Wang, H. H. Jen, and J.-S. You, Scaling laws for non-Hermitian skin effect with long-range couplings, Physical Review B108, 085418 (2023)
2023
-
[62]
L. Li, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Impurity induced scale-free localization, Communications Physics4, 42 (2021)
2021
-
[63]
Guo, C.-H
C.-X. Guo, C.-H. Liu, X.-M. Zhao, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, Exact solution of non-Hermitian systems with general- ized boundary conditions: Size-dependent boundary ef- fect and fragility of the skin effect, Physical Review Let- ters127, 116801 (2021)
2021
-
[64]
W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Physical Review Letters42, 1698 (1979)
1979
-
[65]
A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W.-P. Su, Solitons in conducting polymers, Reviews of Modern Physics60, 781 (1988)
1988
-
[66]
J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators(Springer, Cham, 2016)
2016
-
[67]
Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Optics Letters38, 1912 (2013)
H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Optics Letters38, 1912 (2013)
2013
-
[68]
L. Jin, P. Wang, and Z. Song, Su-schrieffer-heeger chain with one pair of√⊔-symmetric defects, Scientific Reports 7, 5903 (2017)
2017
-
[69]
Yang and C
M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Beyond the non-Hermitian skin effect: Scaling-controlled topology from exceptional- bound bands, Advanced Science13, e23989 (2026)
2026
-
[70]
Yang and C
M. Yang and C. H. Lee, Reversing non-hermitian skin accumulation with a non-local transverse switch, Com- munications Physics9, 210 (2026)
2026
-
[71]
B. A. Bhargava, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and A. G. Moghaddam, Non-Hermitian skin effect of disloca- tions and its topological origin, Physical Review B104, L241402 (2021)
2021
-
[72]
Schindler and A
F. Schindler and A. Prem, Dislocation non-Hermitian skin effect, Physical Review B104, L161106 (2021)
2021
-
[73]
Yi and Z
Y. Yi and Z. Yang, Non-Hermitian skin modes induced by on-site dissipations and chiral tunneling effect, Physical Review Letters125, 186802 (2020)
2020
-
[74]
Zhang, T
X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Advances in Physics: X7, 2109431 (2022)
2022
-
[75]
R. Lin, T. Tai, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Topological non- Hermitian skin effect, Frontiers of Physics18, 53605 (2023)
2023
-
[76]
Q. Li, H. Jiang, and C. H. Lee, Phase-space generalized brillouin zone for spatially inhomogeneous non-hermitian systems, Advanced Science12, e08047 (2025)
2025
-
[77]
Weidemann, M
S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science368, 311 (2020)
2020
-
[78]
Xiao, T.-S
L. Xiao, T.-S. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspon- dence in quantum dynamics, Nature Physics16, 761 (2020)
2020
-
[79]
L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of non-bloch parity-time symmetry and ex- ceptional points, Physical Review Letters126, 230402 (2021)
2021
-
[80]
Zhang, Y
L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Ge, Y. J. Guan, Q. Chen, Q. Yan, F. Chen, R. Xi, Y. Li, D. Jia, S. A. Yuan, H.-x. Sun, H. Chen, and B. Zhang, Acoustic non-Hermitian skin ef- fect from twisted winding topology, Nature Communica- tions12, 6297 (2021)
2021
-
[81]
Zhang, Y
X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin ef- fect, Nature Communications12, 5377 (2021)
2021
-
[82]
W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian morph- ing of topological modes, Nature608, 50 (2022)
2022
-
[83]
Li, L.-W
Z. Li, L.-W. Wang, X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, G. Ma, and J.-H. Jiang, Observation of dynamic non-Hermitian skin effects, Nature Communications15, 6544 (2024)
2024
-
[84]
X. Wang, D. Wang, C. Lu, R.-Y. Zhang, C. H. Lee, K. Ding, and G. Ma, Observation of flat-band skin ef- fect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19745 (2025)
2025 arXiv
-
[85]
D. Zou, T. Chen, W. He, J. Bao, C. H. Lee, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observation of hybrid higher-order skin- topological effect in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nature Communications12, 7201 (2021)
2021
-
[86]
S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T. J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Non-Hermitian skin ef- fect in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit, Research2021, 5608038 (2021)
2021
-
[87]
Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z
S. Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z. B. Siu, H. Sahin, C. H. Lee, and M. B. Jalil, Unconventional skin modes in generalized topolec- trical circuits with multiple asymmetric couplings, Phys- ical Review Research4, 043108 (2022)
2022
-
[88]
Zhang, T
H. Zhang, T. Chen, L. Li, C. H. Lee, and X. Zhang, Electrical circuit realization of topological switching for the non-Hermitian skin effect, Physical Review B107, 085426 (2023)
2023
-
[89]
D. Zou, T. Chen, H. Meng, Y. S. Ang, X. Zhang, and C. H. Lee, Experimental observation of exceptional bound states in a classical circuit network, Science Bul- letin69, 2194 (2024). 8
2024
-
[90]
L. Zhou, H. Li, W. Yi, and X. Cui, Engineering non- Hermitian skin effect with band topology in ultracold gases, Communications Physics5, 252 (2022)
2022
-
[91]
F. Qin, R. Shen, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Kinked linear re- sponse from non-hermitian cold-atom pumping, Physical Review A109, 053311 (2024)
2024
-
[92]
E. Zhao, Z. Wang, C. He, T. F. J. Poon, K. K. Pak, Y.- J. Liu, P. Ren, X.-J. Liu, and G.-B. Jo, Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in an ultracold fermi gas, Na- ture637, 565 (2025)
2025
-
[93]
Exceptional activated mode theory for generalized real-complex transitions
A. Poddubny, J. Zhong, and S. Fan, Mesoscopic non- Hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. A109, L061501 (2024). 9 END MATTER Section I. Admissibility conditions and validity of the two-mode reduction ForH(λ) =H 0 +λV[Eq. (1)], a candidate pair (i,j) of biorthogonal reference modes ...
2024
-
[94]
A full-spectrum test showing that the activated-mode threshold is not a finite-order weak-coupling expansion
-
[95]
A discussion of the two-mode projection and the neglected admixture with remote reference modes
-
[96]
A derivation of the selected (1,2) activated channel in the coupled Hatano–Nelson (HN) ladder, including its reflection-related partner (L−1,L)
-
[97]
A finite-µanalysis of the impurity-closed coupled HN ladder, including the exact reference spectrum, the isolated- chain thresholdµ (0) c , and the boundary-induced activated-channel crossovers responsible for the nonmonotonic λc(µ)
-
[98]
impurity-PBC
A derivation of the topological-edge-channel threshold in the locally activated SSH chain. S1. BENCHMARKING THE ACTIVATED-MODE THRESHOLD IN THE STRONG-COUPLING REGIME The main text introduced a two-mode active block [Eq. (2)] and obtained each pair-resolved threshold from its ...
-
[99]
Solving Eqs
Example I: three-channel sequence(1,2)→(2,3)→(4,5)forL= 10 We first take L= 10, κ= 0.02.(S105) SinceL= 4ℓ+ 2,ℓan integer, the first single-chain collision does not occur atk=π/2. Solving Eqs. (S76) and (S77) gives µ(0) c = 0.83, kc = 1.262 = 0.40π, Ec = 2 coskc = 0.61. (S106) ...
-
[100]
Atµ/µ (0) c = 0.9, which lies above the switching pointµ 1/µ(0) c ≃0.79, the first coalescence has moved to the terminal pair (14,15)
Example II: direct sequence(1,2)→(14,15)forL= 30 Figure S4 shows that the continuously tracked band-edge branches (1,2) remain the first pair to coalesce for µ/µ(0) c = 0, 0.25, and 0.5. Atµ/µ (0) c = 0.9, which lies above the switching pointµ 1/µ(0) c ≃0.79, the first coalesc...
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.